Percutaneous endobiliary ablation of malignant biliary strictures with a novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation device

Clinical evaluation of endoscopic biliary stenting in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice

BACKGROUND

Malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) is characterized by the presence of malignant tumors infiltrating or compressing the bile duct, causing poor bile drainage, generalized yellowing, pain, itching, and malaise. MOJ is burdensome for both the society and the families of affected patients and should be taken seriously.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical effect of stent placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for relieving MOJ and the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in terms of liver function improvement, complication rates, and long-term patient outcomes.

METHODS

The clinical data of 59 patients with MOJ who were admitted to our hospital between March 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, the patients were divided into an observation group (29 patients) and a control group (30 patients). General data, liver function indices, complications, adverse effects, and 3-year survival rates after different surgical treatments were recorded for the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline information (sex, age, tumor type, or tumor diameter) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels were significantly better in both groups after surgery than before surgery (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of biliary bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis was 6.9% in the observation group and 30% in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences in the rates of blood transfusion, intensive care unit admission, or death within 3 years were observed between the two groups at the 1-month follow-up (P > 0.05). The 3-year survival rates were 46.06% and 39.71% in the observation and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic biliary stenting effectively relieves MOJ and significantly improves liver function, with minimal complications. This technique is a promising palliative approach for patients ineligible for radical surgery. However, further research is needed to optimize current treatment strategies and to explore their potential in treating nonmalignant cases of obstructive jaundice.

Intraductal ablation therapy for malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

Malignant biliary obstruction is usually attributed to the enlargement of tumors within or adjacent to the biliary tract, leading to blockage or compression of the bile ducts. Common causes include pancreatic head cancer, bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, liver cancer, and metastatic diseases. Most cases have an insidious onset, lack effective early screening methods, and 70% of patients cannot undergo surgical resection, with a 5-year survival rate of about 30%. Therefore, relieving biliary tree obstruction is crucial. Biliary stents often mitigate the obstruction but can be hindered by tumor progression, endothelial hyperplasia, and bile sludge. As a result, new treatment approaches are constantly being explored to improve outcomes for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

CURRENT SITUATION

One promising technique that has emerged in recent years is radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This innovative method utilizes high-frequency radio waves to generate heat and selectively target tumor cells through localized heating while preserving surrounding healthy tissue. RFA aims to slow tumor growth and enhance biliary stent durability. Studies on endoscopic RFA for malignant biliary obstruction are encouraging. Integrating it with palliative care may better manage symptoms and extend patient quality of life.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, while malignant biliary obstruction remains a complex medical challenge with limited treatment options available for some patients, ongoing research into innovative techniques like radiofrequency ablation offers hope for better outcomes in the future. It is crucial for healthcare professionals to stay informed about these advancements and continue exploring new ways to enhance patient care in this difficult clinical scenario.

Percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and stent placement for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a propensity score matching retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Whether endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) changes the standard role of stent placement in treating unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to compare percutaneous EB-RFA and metal stent placement (RFA-Stent) with metal stent placement alone (Stent) in treating unresectable MBO using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

From June 2013 to June 2018, clinical data from 163 patients with malignant biliary obstruction who underwent percutaneous RFA-Stent or stenting alone were retrospectively analyzed using a nearest-neighbor algorithm to one-to-one PSM analysis to compare primary and secondary stent patency (PSP, SSP), overall survival (OS) and complications between the two groups.

RESULTS

Before matching, for whole patients, RFA-Stent resulted in longer median PSP (8.0 vs. 5.1 months, P = 0.003), SSP (9.8 vs. 5.1 months, P < 0.001) and OS (7.0 vs. 4.5 months, P = 0.034) than the Stent group. After matching (54 pairs), RFA-Stent also resulted in better median PSP (8.5 vs. 5.1 months, P < 0.001), SSP (11.0 vs. 6.0 months, P < 0.001), and OS (8.0 vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.007) than Stent. RFA-Stent was comparable with Stent for complication rates. In Cox analysis, RFA-Stent modality and serum total bilirubin level were independent prognostic factors for PSP. RFA-Stent modality, performance status score and combination therapy after stent were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous RFA-Stent was superior to Stent in terms of PSP, SSP, and OS in selected patients with unresectable MBO.

Percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation with stent placement in type IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A prospective comparison with stent placement alone

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation with stent placement (RFA group) versus stent placement alone (stent group) in patients with type IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

This prospective nonrandomized study was conducted between October 2021 and April 2023. The study included 56 participants (33 men and 23 women, median age 73 years) who underwent percutaneous endobiliary RFA with stent placement (n = 25) or stent placement alone (n = 31) for type IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The primary end point was stent patency, while the secondary end points were procedure-related adverse events (AE) and overall survival.

RESULTS

The percutaneous endobiliary RFA and/or stent placement were successfully completed in all patients in both groups. The median stent patency rate was higher in the RFA group than the stent group (188 days vs. 155 days, p = 0.048). There were no differences in AEs (grade 1 [5 in RFA group vs. 5 in stent group, p = 0.74] and grade 2 AEs [2 vs. 4, p = 0.68]) and patients' survival (median 222 days vs. 214 days, p = 0.49) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma, percutaneous endobiliary RFA with stent placement may improve stent patency without increasing the risk of AEs compared to stent placement alone.

Endoscopic intraductal radiofrequency ablation for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An update (2023)

Recently, endoscopic intraductal radiofrequency ablation (ID-RFA) has attracted attention as a local treatment method for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). ID-RFA causes coagulative necrosis of the tumor tissue in the stricture and induces exfoliation. Its effects are expected to extend the patency period of biliary stents and prolong the survival period. Evidence for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) is gradually accumulating, and some reports show significant therapeutic effects in eCCA patients without distant metastasis. However, it is still far from an established treatment technique, and many unsolved problems remain. Therefore, when performing ID-RFA in clinical practice, it is necessary to understand and grasp the current evidence well and to operate appropriately for the true benefit of the patients. This paper reviews the current status, issues, and prospects of endoscopic ID-RFA for MBO, especially for eCCA.

Effect of radiofrequency ablation in addition to biliary stent on overall survival and stent patency in malignant biliary obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used in addition to stent placement to manage extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction. We aimed to study the effect of RFA on overall survival (OS) and stent patency in malignant biliary obstruction.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed from inception to May 2022 for all studies measuring the effect of RFA plus stents compared to stents placement only on OS and stent patency in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. We measured differences in OS, stent patency, and odds of adverse events. A random effect model was used to pool data for stent patency, OS, and adverse event.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (14 observational and 3 RCT) containing 1766 patients were included in the analysis. The weighted pooled mean survival difference was 58.5 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-84.4, I2 = 71%] in favor of the RFA treatment group. The weighted mean difference in stent patency was better in the RFA plus stent group by 45.3 days (95% CI: 30.1-60.5, I2 = 16.4%) compared to stent only group. The pooled odds of adverse events were the same in both groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.52, 95% CI: 0.96-2.43, I2 = 59%], and no serious adverse event was seen in either group, or no death reported secondary to RFA procedure. No difference in stent patency based on procedure type, including percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (P = 0.06), and an underline cause of bile duct obstruction was found (P = 0.261).

CONCLUSION

RFA treatment, in addition to stent placement in malignant biliary obstruction, potentially improves OS and stent patency duration.

Impact of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation on survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a narrative review

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer originating from the biliary epithelium and accounts for about 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Unfortunately, the majority of patients are not eligible for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis, because of the locally advanced stage or metastatic disease. The overall survival time of unresectable CCA is generally less than 1 year, despite current chemotherapy regimens. Biliary drainage is often required as a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable CCA. Recurrent jaundice and cholangitis tend to occur because of reobstruction of the biliary stents. This not only jeopardizes the efficacy of chemotherapy, but also causes significant morbidity and mortality. Effective control of tumor growth is crucial for prolonging stent patency and consequently patient survival. Recently, endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) has been experimented as a treatment modality to reduce tumor mass, and delay tumor growth, extending stent patency. Ablation is accomplished by means of high-frequency alternating current which is released from the active electrode of an endobiliary probe placed in a biliary stricture. It has been shown that tumor necrosis releases intracellular particles which are highly immunogenic and activate antigen-presenting cells, enhancing local immunity directed against the tumor. This immunogenic response could potentially enhance tumor suppression and be responsible for improved survival of patients with unresectable CCA who undergo ERFA. Several studies have demonstrated that ERFA is associated with an increased median survival of approximately 6 months in patients with unresectable CCA. Furthermore, recent data support the hypothesis that ERFA could ameliorate the efficacy of chemotherapy administered to patients with unresectable CCA, without increasing the risk of complications. This narrative review discusses the results of the studies published in recent years and focuses on the impact that ERFA could have on overall survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Double bare metal stent deployment combined with intraductal radiofrequency ablation for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective pilot study

Although uncovered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) possess certain advantages such as averting cystic duct obstruction and stent migration, they are susceptible to ingrowth occlusion. The combination of the double bare stent (DBS) and endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may reduce ingrowth. Hence, this study aimed to examine the utility of this method for the treatment of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). This prospective, single-center, pilot study enrolled 51 patients who met the eligibility criteria between February 2020 and January 2022. The study outcomes included technical success, clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and other adverse events (AE) besides RBO associated with DBS placement with RFA for MDBO. The technical success rate was 98.0% (50/51). Clinical success was achieved in all patients in whom technical success was achieved. The rates of early and late AEs were 5.9% (3/51) and 8.0% (4/50), respectively. The incidence rate of RBO was 38.0% (19/50). Sludge occlusion, ingrowth occlusion, and overgrowth occlusion occurred in 26.0% (13/50), 8.0% (4/50), and 2.0% (1/50) of patients, respectively (the main cause of RBO was undeterminable in 1 patient). The median time to RBO was 241 days. DBS with RFA showed good technical feasibility, good long-term outcomes, acceptable AE rates, and most importantly, a low ingrowth occlusion rate when employed for the treatment of MDBO.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous endobilliary radiofrequency ablation with a novel temperature-controlled catheter in malignant biliary strictures

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temperature-controlled endobilliary radio-frequency ablation (EB-RFA) followed by metal stent placement for nonresectable malignant biliary strictures.

Material and methods

From May 2017 to March 2021, 18 patients with malignant biliary obstruction who had undergone percutaneous EB-RFA and stent placement (n = 9) or stent placement only (n = 9) were included in this retrospective study. Outcomes were stent patency, technical and clinical success, overall survival, and 30-day complication rate. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship of EB-RFA with stent patency and overall survival.

Results

The clinical and technical success rate for each group was 100%. The median stent patency was 128 days (95% CI: 122.2-133.8) in the EB-RFA group and 86 days (95% CI: 1.2-170.7) in the control group. It was significantly longer in the study group (p = 0.012). The mean overall survival was 267.7 ± 68.5 days (95% CI: 133.3-402.2) in the study group and 239.6 ± 33.9 days (95% CI: 173.1-306.2) in the control group. Log-rank test showed there was not a statistically significant difference in overall survival rates (p = 0.302). There were no major complications and no statistically significant difference in cholangitis rates (p = 0.620).

Conclusions

Percutaneous temperature-controlled EB-RFA combined with biliary stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction can be safe and feasible, and effectively increase stent patency.

Comparative efficacy and safety of local palliative therapeutics for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both radiofrequency ablation (RFA), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and biliary stent alone are common local palliative therapies for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), but the best modality is uncertain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to 30 January 2022, for eligible studies that compared either two or all modalities in unresectable MBO.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies with 2974 patients were included in this study. The PDT+Stent and RFA+Stent groups had better overall survival and longer mean survival time than Stent alone (all P < 0.05). Moreover, patients with RFA+Stent demonstrated better mean duration of stent patency (MD: 2.0, 95%CI,1.1 to 2.8, P < 0.05) than Stent alone. The three modalities had similar postoperative mild bleeding, cholangitis, and pancreatitis (all P ≥ 0.05). According to network ranking, PDT+Stent was most likely to provide better survival, RFA+Stent was most likely to maintain stent patency.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA or PDT plus biliary stent is effective and safe local palliative therapy for unresectable MBO, but the current studies cannot absolutely determine which modality is the best. We should offer patients the most appropriate treatment according to the advantage of each therapy and the patient's performance status.

Local palliative therapies for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: radiofrequency ablation combined with stent or biliary stent alone? An updated meta-analysis of nineteen trials

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been a burgeoning interest in radiofrequency ablation combined with stent (RFA + Stent) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RFA + Stent compared with biliary stent alone.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception dates to June 20, 2021, for studies that compared RFA + Stent and stent alone for unresectable MBO. The main outcomes were survival, patency, and adverse effects. All meta-analyses were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies involving 1946 patients were included in this study. Compared with stent alone, RFA + Stent was significantly associated with better overall survival (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48, 0.63; P < 0.00001), longer mean survival time (SMD 2.20; 95% CI 1.17, 3.22; P < 0.0001), longer mean stent patency time (SMD 1.37; 95% CI 0.47, 2.26; P = 0.003), higher stent patency at 6 months (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.54, 5.18; P = 0.0008). The two interventions had similar incidence of postoperative abdominal pain (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.94, 1.78; P = 0.11), mild bleeding (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.65, 2.54; P = 0.48), cholangitis (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.76, 1.55; P = 0.65), pancreatitis (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.82, 2.38; P = 0.22). Furthermore, the serum bilirubin levels and stricture diameter after operations were significantly alleviated than before operations, but the degree of alleviation between the two groups were not significantly different (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the alleviation of serum bilirubin and stricture diameter did not differ between the two interventions, RFA + Stent can significantly improve the survival and stent patency with comparable procedure-related adverse events than stent alone. Thus, RFA + Stent should be recommended as an attractive alternative to biliary stent alone for patients with unresectable MBO.

Updated evidence on the clinical impact of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction

Endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was recently developed as a novel adjunctive procedure and a promising therapeutic option in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). RFA can achieve local tumor control, resulting in improved biliary stent patency and a potential survival benefit. However, the efficacy of biliary RFA remains controversial, and previous studies have shown conflicting results. At present, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is considered the condition most effectively treated by biliary RFA, but there is limited research even on this point. Further, limitations of RFA associated with the devices used during the procedure are an important subject of discussion. In addition to further well-designed clinical trials, development of innovative devices is warranted to investigate and conclusively establish the usefulness of biliary RFA. In this review we summarize the updated evidence regarding the use of endoscopic biliary RFA for MBO and discuss issues that should be addressed in future studies.