Current practices in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a survey of indications among Korean endoscopists

Long-term prognosis of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer according to submucosal invasion: a multicenter cohort study

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can provide a high en bloc resection rate and has been widely applied as curative treatment for early colorectal cancer (ECC). However, surgical treatment is occasionally required, and reports on the long-term prognosis of ESD are insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of ECC removal by ESD, including local recurrence and metastasis.

Methods

This multicenter study was conducted retrospectively on 450 consecutive patients with ECC who were treated with ESD between November 2003 and December 2013. Clinical, pathological, and endoscopic data were collected to determine tumor depth, resection margin, lymphovascular invasion, and recurrence.

Results

The median follow-up period was 53.8 (12–138 months). The en bloc resection rate was 85.3% (384) and in intramucosal cancer being 84.1% and in superficial submucosal invasion (SM1) cancer being 89.8% (p = 0.158). The curative resection rate was 76.0% (n = 342), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (77.3% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.231). The overall recurrence free survival rate (RFS) was 98.7% (444/450). In patients with curative resection, there was no statistically significant difference in RFS according to invasion depth (intramucosal: 99.3% vs. SM1: 97.1%, p = 0.248).

Conclusions

Patients with curatively resected ECC treated with ESD showed favorable long-term outcomes. Curatively resected SM1 cancer has a RFS similar to that of intramucosal cancer.

Risk of Covert Submucosal Cancer in Patients With Granular Mixed Laterally Spreading Tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Granular mixed laterally spreading tumors (GM-LSTs) have an intermediate level of risk for submucosal invasive cancer (SMICs) without clear signs of invasion (covert); the optimal resection method is uncertain. We aimed to determine the risk of covert SMIC in GM-LSTs based on clinical and endoscopic factors.

METHODS

We collected data from 693 patients (50.6% male; median age, 69 years) with colorectal GM-LSTs, without signs of invasion, who underwent endoscopic resection (74.2%) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (25.2%) at 7 centers in Italy from 2016 through 2019. We performed multivariate and univariate analyses to identify demographic and endoscopic factors associated with risk of SMIC. We developed a multivariate model to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT) to detect 1 SMIC.

RESULTS

Based on pathology analysis, 66 patients (9.5%) had covert SMIC. In multivariate analyses, increased risk of covert SMIC were independently associated with increasing lesion size (odds ratio per mm increase, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P = .003) and rectal location (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62-5.83; P = .004). A logistic regression model based on lesion size (with a cutoff of 40 mm) and rectal location identified patients with covert SMIC with 47.0% sensitivity, 82.6% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.69. The NNT to identify 1 patient with a nonrectal SMIC smaller than 4 cm was 20; the NNT to identify 1 patient with a rectal SMIC of 4 cm or more was 5.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of data from 693 patients, we found the risk of covert SMIC in patients with GM-LSTs to be approximately 10%. GM-LSTs of 4 cm or more and a rectal location are high risk and should be treated by en-bloc resection. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03836131.

[Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer]

Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study

Background/Aims

The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps.

Methods

A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts a scenario-based questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps.

Results

A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6–9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10–19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the image-based survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer–prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps.

Conclusions

The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps <10 mm in size, in contrast to recent guidelines. (Gut Liver 2021;15-400)

Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer

Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

The risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The most common complication of post-colorectal endoscopic resection is delayed bleeding. The assessment of risk factors for delayed bleeding provides important and useful information in standard clinical operations. The risk factors have been previously reported; however, they remain inconsistent across different studies.

AREAS COVERED

In this meta-analysis, the patient conditions, lesion-related factors, and operation-related factors were compared between delayed bleeding and no bleeding. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database were searched to identify eligible studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated along with heterogeneity.

EXPERT OPINION

This study is the first meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for colorectal delayed bleeding. We found several risk factors contributing to this condition: colorectal tumors located in the proximal colon, a history of antithrombotic drug use, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer, piecemeal resection, intraoperative hemorrhage, no clip placement, and severe submucosal fibrosis. Despite our findings, we also conclude that more high-quality, large-scale clinical randomized controlled studies are needed due to limited retrospective studies at present. Future therapeutic colonoscopies should focus on precise diagnosis, treatment safety, and management during the perioperative period.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer

Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer

Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by <i>en bloc</i> fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

Clinical outcomes of submucosal colorectal cancer diagnosed after endoscopic resection: a focus on the need for surgery

Background/Aims

We aimed to investigate the proportion of and risk factors for residual cancer and/or lymph node metastasis after surgery was performed because of high-risk pathological features in endoscopic resection specimen of suspected superficial submucosal colorectal cancer (SSMC).

Methods

We reviewed medical records of 497 patients (58.8 ± 9.8 years, 331 males) undergoing endoscopic resection of suspected SSMC. High-risk pathological features included: deep submucosal cancer invasion ≥ 1,000 μm; positive lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion; poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; and positive resection margin. We investigated the occurrence of additional surgery and residual cancer and/or lymph node involvement in the surgical specimen.

Results

En bloc resection was performed in 447 patients (89.9%). High-risk pathological features were detected in 372 patients (74.8%). Additional surgery was performed in 336 of 372 patients with high-risk pathological features. Of these, 47 surgical specimens (14.0%) showed residual cancer and/or lymph node metastasis. Piecemeal resection was more common in those with residual cancer and/or lymph node involvement than those without (9/47 [19.1%] vs. 24/289 [8.3%], P= 0.032). Positive resection margin was also significantly associated with positive residual cancer and/or lymph node involvement. As the number of high-risk pathological features increased, the risk of regional lymph node metastasis increased proportionally (P= 0.002).

Conclusions

High-risk pathological features were frequently detected after endoscopic resection of suspected SSMC while residual cancer and/or lymph node metastasis were not commonly present in the additional surgical specimen. Further optimized strategy for proper endoscopic management of suspected SSMC is necessary.

Risk factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (HASID) multicenter study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are large and superficial neoplasms. Most are adenomatous lesions. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard technique of removing precursor colorectal lesions. The aim of the present study was to assess the factors associated with the clinical outcomes of EMR for LSTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 275 patients with LSTs who underwent EMR were enrolled in the study. The clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed by retrospectively reviewing their medical records.

RESULTS

The en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 86.9% and 80.4%, respectively. The bleeding and perforation rates were 7.6% and 0.4%, respectively. The frequency of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma histology was significantly higher, and the procedure time was significantly longer in LSTs >20 mm than in those ≤20 mm. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in LSTs ≤20 mm than in those >20 mm. The frequency of piecemeal resection was significantly higher in LSTs with an adenomatous and cancerous pit pattern than in those with a non-neoplastic pit pattern. The frequency of piecemeal resection was significantly higher in LSTs with adenocarcinoma than in those with low-grade dysplasia. Multivariate analysis revealed that adenomatous pit pattern, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma was a significant independent risk factor of LSTs for piecemeal resection after EMR.

CONCLUSION

EMR is useful for treating ≤20 mm LSTs with regard to curative resection and procedure time. LSTs with an adenomatous pit pattern, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma are significant independent risk factors for piecemeal resection after EMR.

Outcomes of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia patients referred for potential endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a treatment option for dysplasia in ulcerative colitis (UC) has been reported, but the associated therapeutic decision-making and clinical outcomes have not been extensively investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 25 UC patients who were referred for potential ESD of non-polypoid or sessile dysplasia. We analyzed the treatment decisions and the ESD and colectomy outcomes for this patient group.

RESULTS

All lesions were located at the colitic segments. The median UC duration was 13.4 years. A colectomy was recommended for 10 patients because of ulceration with indistinct borders (one patient), non-ulceration with indistinct borders (two patients), and non-lifting signs (seven patients). The remaining 15 patients underwent ESD. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were 93.3% and 80%, respectively. The median hospitalization periods were 1 (range, 1-2) day after ESD and 7 (range, 5-30) days after colectomy. No procedure-related complications occurred after ESD, but early and late postoperative complications occurred in two (22.2%) and six (66.7%) of the colectomized patients, respectively. Fourteen ESD cases were followed endoscopically for a median period of 24.7 (range, 5.2-64.8) months. Local recurrence occurred in 2 (14.3%) patients, and metachronous recurrence was identified in two separate patients (14.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a feasible endoscopic treatment option for UC-associated dysplasia showing noninvasive pit or vascular patterns, no surface ulceration, distinct borders, and appropriate lifting after submucosal injection. Meticulous endoscopic surveillance is essential to monitor for local or metachronous recurrence of dysplasia after ESD.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors with advanced histology

BACKGROUND

Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are large, flat neoplasms that are usually treated using different endoscopic techniques based on their morphology, size, and histology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LSTs with advanced histology treated by endoscopic resection.

METHODS

A total of 246 LSTs with advanced histology [i.e., high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma (AC)] treated by endoscopic resection [i.e., endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), EMR-precutting (EMR-P), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)] were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected by review of patient's medical records.

RESULTS

The en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 75.6% and 85.0%, respectively. The bleeding and perforation rates were 10.2% and 2.4%, respectively. The frequency of cancerous pit pattern and bleeding was significantly higher in LSTs with AC than in LSTs with HGD. The R0 resection rate in LSTs with HGD was significantly higher than that in LSTs with AC. The frequency of cancerous pit patterns in LST cases with submucosal AC was significantly higher than those with intramucosal AC. The mean size of the LSTs was significantly larger in ESD group than in EMR or EMR-P groups. The frequencies of nodular mixed subtype, cancerous pit patterns, and en bloc resection rates were significantly higher in the ESD group than in the EMR or EMR-P groups. However, the frequency of perforation was significantly higher in EMR-P group than in EMR or ESD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ESD is a more acceptable treatment approach for resection of colorectal LSTs of larger size, with nodular mixed subtype, having a cancerous pit pattern or AC, using either en bloc or curative resection methods, compared to EMR or EMR-P procedures.

Clinicopathological feature and treatment outcome of patients with colorectal laterally spreading tumors treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced technique that can be used to treat precancerous and early colorectal neoplasms by facilitating en bloc resection regardless of tumor size. In our study, we investigated the clinicopathological feature and the treatment outcome of patients with colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) that were treated by ESD.

METHODS

The study enrolled all of 210 patients with colorectal LSTs who underwent ESD. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by retrospectively reviewing medical records.

RESULTS

A cancerous pit pattern (Vi/Vn) was more common in pseudo-depressed (PD) subtype than in flat elevated (FE) subtype. The incidence of adenocarcinoma in the PD subtype and nodular mixed (NM) subtypes was significantly higher than in the homogenous (HG) subtype and FE subtype. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were 89.0% and 85.7%, respectively. The bleeding and perforation rates were 5.2% and 1.9%, respectively. The mean procedure time was much longer in the PD subtype than in the FE subtype. The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the NM subtype than in the HG subtype. However, there were no statistically significant differences in mean procedure time, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, bleeding rate, or perforation rate between LST-granular and LST-nongranular types.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ESD is acceptable for treating colorectal LSTs concerning en bloc resection, curative resection, and risk of complications. Careful consideration is required for complete resection of the PD subtype and NM subtype because of their higher malignant potential.

Risk factors for procedure-related complications after endoscopic resection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors

Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are large and flat elevated neoplasms with diameters of at least 10 mm. Endoscopic resection of LSTs, with their large size and broad base, is difficult and dangerous compared with the resection of polypoid neoplasms. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for procedure-related complications including bleeding and perforation after endoscopic resection of LSTs.Patients with colorectal LST undergoing endoscopic resection at 5 university hospitals in Honam Province of South Korea were enrolled, and their records about patients, lesions, and procedure parameters associated with the occurrence of complications were reviewed retrospectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complications.The frequency of comorbidities in bleeding group was significantly higher than in the no bleeding group. The frequency of bleeding was significantly higher in lesions with adenocarcinoma than in lesions with low or high-grade dysplasia. The frequency of bleeding was significantly higher in piecemeal resection than in en bloc resection. The frequency of perforation was significantly higher in endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting (EMR-P) than in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection. The mean procedure duration was significantly longer in the perforation group than in the no perforation group. On multivariate analysis, patient comorbidity and histologic grade of the lesion were significant independent risk factors for bleeding, whereas EMR-P was a significant independent risk factor for perforation after endoscopic resection.This study demonstrated that patient comorbidity and histologic grade of lesion were significant independent risk factors for bleeding, and EMR-P was a significant independent risk factor for perforation after endoscopic resection of colorectal LSTs.

Recurrence rate of lateral margin-positive cases after en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasia

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the recurrence rate of colorectal neoplasia showing histologic lateral margin involvement after en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

We reviewed 527 colorectal lesions that were removed by en bloc ESD from 2005 to 2013 and followed by endoscopy. Based on the postprocedural pathologic reports, the lesions were categorized as follows: lesions with clear deep and positive lateral margins (n = 63) and lesions with R0 resection (n = 299).

RESULTS

The tumor size was 45.7 ± 21.1 mm in the lateral margin-positive group and 30.6 ± 15.1 in the R0 group (P < 0.001). Procedure time was longer in the lateral margin-positive group than in the R0 group (94.3 ± 75.1 vs. 54.1 ± 48.9 min; P < 0.001). Lateral margin positivity was associated with ESD time ≥ 120 min in the multivariate analysis. Compared with 0-I morphology, LST-G was significantly associated with the lateral margin positivity. The volume of ESD experience in endoscopists may also be associated with the lateral margin positivity. Histologic reassessment of the specimen suggested that 32.2% of lateral margin-positive cases based on the initial pathology report were false-positive lateral margin involvement. The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate was 0.6% in the R0 group and 5% in the margin-positive group (P = 0.198).

CONCLUSIONS

The local recurrence rate was not higher in lateral margin-positive cases than in R0 resection cases if the colorectal epithelial neoplasia was removed in an en bloc manner using ESD. Meticulous pathologic interpretation may reduce unnecessarily frequent surveillance after en bloc ESD.