Buprenorphine and its formulations: a comprehensive review

Providers' Barriers to Buprenorphine Prescribing for Cancer-Related Pain

BACKGROUND

Full-agonist opioids are standard for treating cancer-related pain. However partial-agonist opioids (e.g., buprenorphine) are promising treatments with fewer side effects and a stronger safety profile. However, it is unclear how oncology and palliative care providers (Medical Doctors, Advanced Practice Providers, etc.) perceive prescribing of buprenorphine for cancer-related pain.

METHODS

Participants (N = 42; 50% oncology) at a single healthcare system with multiple hospitals completed a one-time web-delivered survey assessing reported opioid prescribing patterns and barriers to buprenorphine prescribing for cancer-related pain. Independent samples t- and chi-square tests compared palliative and oncology providers' opioid prescribing and barriers to buprenorphine use; we examined how barriers related to intentions to prescribe buprenorphine with correlations.

RESULTS

Most participants reported awareness of buprenorphine for cancer-related pain (81%), and that buprenorphine is effective for treating cancer-related pain (80%), but few reported prescribing it (oncology 0%; palliative 5%). Oncology providers reported lack of knowledge about buprenorphine prescribing. Palliative care providers reported opioid stigma (61.7%) and patients' difficulty obtaining buprenorphine (47.6%) were barriers. Prescribing participants' future intentions to prescribe buprenorphine for cancer-related pain was significantly associated with endorsement that buprenorphine is as effective as (r = .53, P = .005), and that it causes fewer side-effects relative to (r = .59, P < .001) other opioids.

DISCUSSION

Our study identified knowledge gaps in cancer care teams about buprenorphine for cancer-related pain. Future research should consider education for oncology teams on buprenorphine, and how oncology and palliative care teams can benefit from working together to reduce stigma when communicating with patients about buprenorphine.

Strategy for effective analgesia with intravenous buprenorphine in patients with acute postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Analgesic treatment is the primary method for managing acute postoperative pain. Opioid analgesics are the main class of drugs used to treat moderate to severe pain, whether it is acute or chronic. These opioids differ in various ways, including their pharmacochemical properties, distribution and absorption rates, metabolism, and elimination pathways for the drug and its metabolites. These differences result in varying degrees of analgesic efficacy, which, in clinical practice, allows for the selection of the most effective drug that maximizes pain relief while ensuring safety. Buprenorphine is a semi-synthetic opioid with properties that are not yet fully understood. It has a wide range of applications in treating both acute and chronic pain, including non-cancer and cancer-related pain. One of the most significant clinical advantages of buprenorphine is its safety profile, which includes a ceiling effect on respiratory depression, no immunosuppressive effects, inhibition of hyperalgesia, no cumulative effects in patients with renal failure, and a low risk of constipation following its use.

AIM

This study aims to analyze current reports on the use of intravenous buprenorphine as a first-line opioid analgesic for postoperative pain relief. The paper discusses the pharmacochemical properties of the drug and the mechanisms behind postoperative pain. Additionally, it presents the experiences of the pain management team at Copernicus Hospital in Gdansk regarding administering intravenous buprenorphine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current literature on buprenorphine for treating moderate to severe acute pain has been reviewed, focusing on its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain following surgical procedures. Additionally, the experience of the Copernicus Hospital pain team with buprenorphine is summarized in a brief discussion.

CONCLUSION

After reviewing current literature and recommendations, along with the experiences of the pain management team at Copernicus Hospital in Gdańsk, it can be concluded that buprenorphine is an analgesic that demonstrates a high level of efficacy and safety. When used in combination with non-opioid analgesics, buprenorphine achieves a synergistic effect, resulting in effective pain relief. This approach facilitates early patient rehabilitation and enables a swift return to normal activities, even following extensive surgical procedures.

Challenges in Transitioning from Methadone to Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Chronic Pain Management: Two Cases

Background

Methadone is frequently used for chronic pain management due to its long half-life and NMDA receptor activity, making it an effective option for opioid-tolerant patients. Buprenorphine-naloxone is increasingly explored as an alternative for chronic pain and opioid use disorder, offering partial opioid agonism with a ceiling effect on respiratory depression. The transition from methadone to buprenorphine-naloxone remains clinically challenging, requiring careful management to prevent withdrawal and ensure adequate pain control.

Case Descriptions

Two patients with chronic pain were transitioned from methadone to buprenorphine-naloxone. The first patient, a mid-40s female, was abruptly switched from methadone 10 mg twice daily dosing to buprenorphine-naloxone 4 mg-1 mg twice daily dosing without a taper, resulting in severe withdrawal requiring hospitalization. The second patient, a late-50s male, underwent a two-month methadone taper before initiating buprenorphine-naloxone 4 mg-1 mg twice daily dosing, but reported persistent uncontrolled pain despite dose escalation to 4 mg-1 mg three times a day. Both patients reported significant dissatisfaction with buprenorphine-naloxone therapy, citing inadequate pain relief. Both patients eventually left the practice and were lost to follow up.

Conclusion

These cases underscore the challenges of transitioning chronic pain patients from methadone to buprenorphine-naloxone formulations. Transitioning patients between these medications may lead to issues regarding withdrawal symptoms, inadequate pain control, and patient attrition.

Trends in Outpatient Buprenorphine Prescribing for Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Analysis Over 18 Months

Background

Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, has gained attention for its use in chronic pain management due to its lower risk of abuse and respiratory depression compared to traditional opioids. The utilization of buprenorphine for chronic pain has increased in recent years. This study aimed to analyze trends in buprenorphine prescribing for chronic pain in an outpatient setting over an 18-month period, excluding buprenorphine-naloxone combinations used for opioid use disorder and opioid dependence.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted, examining outpatient buprenorphine and long-acting opioid prescriptions issued by three pain management physicians between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Prescription data were collected from electronic medical records (EMRs) and analyzed across three six-month intervals: January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023; July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. Only unique buprenorphine prescriptions for chronic pain management were included, while buprenorphine-naloxone prescriptions for opioid use disorder were excluded. Long-acting opioids analyzed included extended release (ER) formulations including tramadol ER, morphine ER, hydrocodone ER, oxycodone ER, fentanyl, and methadone.

Results

Over the 18-month study period, a total of 61 unique buprenorphine prescriptions for chronic pain were issued by the three physicians. The number of prescriptions increased across each six-month period: 18 prescriptions were issued between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2023; 20 prescriptions from July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023; and 23 prescriptions from January 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024. This represents a 27.8% increase over the entire 18-month period. During the same timeframe, 117 long-acting opioid prescriptions (excluding buprenorphine) were issued in the first six-month period, 121 prescriptions in the second period, and 108 prescriptions in the third period. Buprenorphine prescriptions accounted for 13.3% of all long-acting opioid prescriptions in the first period (18 out of 135 total prescriptions), 14.2% in the second period (20 out of 141 total prescriptions), and 17.6% in the third period (23 out of 131 total prescriptions). Notably, while the absolute number of buprenorphine prescriptions increased steadily, its proportion relative to total long-acting opioid prescriptions also grew over time.

Conclusions

The findings demonstrate a steady increase in buprenorphine prescribing for chronic pain in the outpatient setting, while long-acting opioid prescriptions exhibited a slight decline in the later periods. The proportion of buprenorphine prescriptions relative to long-acting opioids increased over time, suggesting growing acceptance of buprenorphine as a safer alternative for chronic pain management. Further research is needed to explore the factors driving these prescribing patterns and the long-term clinical outcomes associated with buprenorphine use in chronic pain management.

IUPHAR review: Drug repurposing in Schizophrenia - An updated review of clinical trials

There is an urgent need for mechanistically novel and more efficacious treatments for schizophrenia, especially those targeting negative and cognitive symptoms with a more favorable side-effect profile. Drug repurposing-the process of identifying new therapeutic uses for already approved compounds-offers a promising approach to overcoming the lengthy, costly, and high-risk process of traditional CNS drug discovery. This review aims to update our previous findings on the clinical drug repurposing pipeline in schizophrenia. We examined studies conducted between 2018 and 2024, identifying 61 trials evaluating 40 unique repurposed drug candidates. These encompassed a broad range of pharmacological mechanisms, including immunomodulation, cognitive enhancement, and hormonal, metabolic, and neurotransmitter modulation. A notable development is the combination of the muscarinic modulators xanomeline, a compound with antipsychotic properties, and trospium, included to mitigate peripheral side effects, now approved by the FDA as the first antipsychotic drug in decades with a fundamentally novel mechanism of action. Moving beyond the traditional dopaminergic paradigm of schizophrenia, such findings highlight opportunities to improve treatment-resistant symptoms and alleviate adverse effects. Overall, the evolving drug repurposing landscape illustrates a significant shift in the rationale for schizophrenia drug development, highlighting the potential of in silico strategies, biomarker-based patient stratification, and personalized treatments that align with underlying pathophysiological processes.

Opioid use and abuse in adolescents and young adults; dealing with science, laws and ethics: Charming the COBRAS

The subject of substance use disorders in the pediatric population remains a disturbing conundrum for clinicians, researchers and society in general. Many of our youth are at risk of being damaged and even killed by drug addictions that result from the collision of rapidly developing as well as vulnerable central nervous systems encountering the current global drug addiction crisis. A major motif of this chemical calamity is opioid use disorder in adolescents and young adults that was stimulated by the 19th century identification of such highly addictive drugs as morphine, heroin and a non-opiate, cocaine. This analysis focuses on the pervasive presence of opioid drugs such as heroin and fentanyl that has become a major tragedy in the 21st century arising from an overall substance use and misuse phenomenon rampant in global society. Themes covered in this article include the history of addictive drugs in humans, diagnostic terms in use, the role of neurobiology in drug addiction, and current psychopharmacologic approaches to opioid overdose as well as addiction. Our youth are continuously confronted by dangers of high-risk behaviors including death and injury from opioid use disorders due to their central nervous system neuroplasticity as well as the widespread availability of these harmful chemicals. Healthcare professionals should actively assist our youth who unknowingly and even innocently encounter this deadly menace in the 21st century.

Unrestricted insurance coverage of buprenorphine formulations remains sparse in comparison to conventional opioids

OBJECTIVE

Buprenorphine is an atypical opioid with analgesic efficacy and a more favorable safety profile than conventional opioids or tramadol. In 2019, access to on-label buprenorphine formulations was limited in comparison to conventional opioids, despite evidence supporting buprenorphine's first-line analgesic use. Considering recent policy changes increasing buprenorphine accessibility, we determined differences in unrestricted insurance coverage between buprenorphine, conventional opioids, and other atypical opioids.

METHODS

We used data from Managed Market Insights and Technology's Coverage Search and Kaiser Family Foundation to generate estimates on percentages of US-covered lives with unrestricted access to oxycodone, morphine, tramadol, tapentadol, generic and on-label transdermal buprenorphine, on-label buccal buprenorphine, and on-label sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone in 2024.

RESULTS

79.7% of commercial and 99.1% of Medicare lives had unrestricted oxycodone access. Morphine access was unrestricted for 45.7% of commercial and 62.8% of Medicare lives. Unrestricted access to tramadol was available for 88.2% of commercial and 96.3% of Medicare lives. 37.3% of commercial and 10.1% of Medicare lives had unrestricted tapentadol access. Unrestricted access to on-label transdermal buprenorphine was available for 21.0% of commercial and 2.59% of Medicare lives. Generic transdermal buprenorphine was available for 52.1% of commercial and 30.0% of Medicare lives. Buccal buprenorphine was available without restriction for 52.7% of commercial and 19.8% of Medicare lives. Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone had unrestricted coverage for 34.6% of commercial and 32.7% of Medicare lives.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to buprenorphine formulations was limited in comparison to other opioids. This study emphasizes a need for commercial and Medicare health insurance plans to broaden buprenorphine coverage.

Perioperative Medicine for Ambulatory Surgery

Ambulatory anesthesia for same-day surgery is a fast-growing and ever-improving branch of modern anesthesia. This is primarily driven by the involvement of anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians working in multidisciplinary groups. These groups work together to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and overall efficiency of both in-patient and out-patient surgery. Appropriate patient selection and optimization are critical to maintain and improve the foundational entities of best ambulatory anesthesia practice. In this review article, a selection of considerations in the field of ambulatory anesthesia are featured, such as the aging population, sleep apnea, obesity, diabetes, cardiac disease, substance abuse, preoperative medication management, multimodal analgesia, social determinants of health, and surgical facility resources.

Prescribing of extended release buprenorphine injection for Medicaid beneficiaries, 2018-2022

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Extended release buprenorphine injection (INJ-BUP) has been available in the United States since 2018. INJ-BUP has the potential to positively impact opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment outcomes by providing additional treatment options. As one of the largest payers of OUD treatment in the US, Medicaid coverage is important for access and uptake of INJ-BUP. Uptake of INJ-BUP among Medicaid beneficiaries has not been described since 2019 and variation in uptake by state has not previously been explored. We aimed to measure prescribing of INJ-BUP for Medicaid beneficiaries since 2018, nationwide and by state.

METHODS

We analyzed State Drug Utilization Data from 2017 to 2022 and calculated the number of prescription fills for INJ-BUP and oral buprenorphine paid by Medicaid. To compare across states, we calculated the number of prescription fills per 100 Medicaid beneficiaries treated for OUD using data from Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Substance Use Disorder (T-MSIS SUD) Data Books. Data sources are publicly available.

RESULTS

The number of prescription fills for INJ-BUP paid by Medicaid increased from 4322 (0.1% of all buprenorphine prescription fills) in 2018 to 186 861 (2.0%) in 2022. Each year the increase in fills exceeded the prior year change, indicating accelerating uptake. There was notable variability across states.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of extended release buprenorphine injection prescriptions among US Medicaid beneficiaries treated for opioid use disorder increased from over 4000 prescriptions in 2018 to over 185 000 in 2022 but uptake is much less than observed in other countries over shorter time periods.

Enhancing Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: An Economic Evaluation of Improving Medication Adherence for Buprenorphine Through Blister-Packaging

Background

The opioid epidemic has severely impacted the US over the last 15 years. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist indicated for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) and is recognized as an effective treatment when taken as prescribed. However, adherence rates have been low in real-world settings. Blister-packaging has been shown to promote medication adherence across a variety of disease states, although it has never been studied in OUD.

Methods

An economic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of increased adherence of blister-packaged buprenorphine on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and health care costs for 10,000 patients initiating therapy for OUD. The model analyzed a commercially insured population within the US over a one-year time horizon. Medication adherence was defined in the model as proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%. Literature-based references were used to inform both the impact of blister-packaging on the number of patients who became adherent as well as the impact of medication adherence on HCRU and health care costs. Model input uncertainty was assessed in one-way sensitivity analyses.

Results

With the implementation of blister-packaging buprenorphine, adherence rates increased from 37.1% of patients in the pre-intervention period to 45.3%, resulting in an additional 818 patients becoming adherent post-intervention. The increase in adherence led to a reduction of medical costs of $12,138,757 (-$1,214 per-patient (PP)). Specifically, inpatient costs decreased by $7,127,073 (-$713 PP) while outpatient costs decreased by $5,013,319 (-$501 PP). Pharmacy costs increased by $3,432,705 ($343 PP). Despite the increase in pharmacy costs, total health care costs saw a reduction of $8,559,684 (-$856 PP).

Conclusion

Blister-packaging buprenorphine for treatment of OUD has potential to improve medication adherence and health outcomes while reducing HCRU and health care costs. Future studies are necessary to assess the real-world application and impact of blister-packaging buprenorphine for OUD across various patient populations and health care settings.

Efficacy and safety of sublingual buprenorphine in managing acute postoperative pain - A systematic review

Sublingual (SL) buprenorphine has been used as a modality of managing acute postoperative pain in many studies. This systematic review aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of SL buprenorphine as an analgesic for various surgeries. After registering the protocol with PROSPERO, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases with relevant keywords. The primary outcomes were 24-hour pain scores, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation scores, pruritus, rescue analgesia, and urinary retention. The risk of bias scale was used to identify the quality of evidence. From the 103 articles identified, four randomized-controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. The overall risk of bias was low. Most of the studies showed that the use of SL buprenorphine led to either better or comparable pain scores when compared to a control group with lesser or tolerable adverse events. There was a lot of heterogeneity across the studies in this systematic review in terms of the type of surgery performed, the comparison groups, doses of buprenorphine, and the outcomes that were assessed. Therefore, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. The results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the methodology. Adequately powered studies with robust methodology should investigate the safety and efficacy of SL buprenorphine when used for postoperative analgesia.

Buprenorphine Transdermal Delivery System: Bioequivalence Assessment and Adhesion Performance of Two Patch Formulations

Background and Objective: Buprenorphine is an opioid drug indicated for the management of severe and persistent pain. The buprenorphine transdermal patch provides a non-invasive method of rate-controlled drug release, ensuring constant and predictable drug plasma levels over an extended period. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence, skin adhesion non-inferiority, and tolerability of two buprenorphine transdermal patches to meet the regulatory requirements for the registration of a generic product in Brazil. Methods: A randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover trial was performed involving healthy subjects of both genders. The subjects received a single dose of either the test formulation or the reference formulation (Restiva®), separated by a 29-day washout period. For pharmacokinetic analysis, blood samples were collected up to 12 days post-dose and quantified using a validated bioanalytical method. Skin adhesion was assessed over a 7-day period (dosing interval) following patch application. Seventy-six subjects were enrolled and fifty-two completed the study. Results and Conclusion: The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax, AUC0-t, and partial AUCs were within the acceptable bioequivalence limits of 80 to 125%. Adhesion comparison showed the non-inferiority of the test formulation. Based on ANVISA's regulatory requirements, the test and reference formulations were considered bioequivalent and could be interchangeable in clinical practice.

HIV and Substance Use Disorders

Over 1.2 million Americans aged 13 years and older have been diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). While HIV incidence has been declining since 2017, the risk of HIV acquisition and transmission persists among persons who use drugs via injection drug use and unprotected sexual intercourse associated with substance use. Untreated substance use disorder (SUD) is associated with poor adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy, poor HIV outcomes, and increased risk for HIV acquisition. Herein, we describe the intertwined syndemic of HIV and SUD, as well as treatment strategies and evidence-based public health efforts to engage and retain persons who use drugs into care.

Orally dissolving buprenorphine for opioid use disorder linked to caries

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is under scrutiny because of the development of xerostomia and caries. The purpose of this article was to inform dental care professionals about the oral effects of buprenorphine and to increase knowledge and awareness of medication-assisted treatment in the management of opioid use disorder (OUD).

CASE DESCRIPTION

In 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about xerostomia and caries associated with the use of transmucosal (sublingual and buccal formulations) buprenorphine. Dental health care professionals should instruct patients taking buprenorphine on how to prevent these dental issues by means of rinsing with water and swallowing once the drug has been completely dissolved, followed by toothbrushing at least 1 hour after taking the drug. In addition, a fluoride supplement should be prescribed.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

It is imperative for dentists to recognize buprenorphine as medication-assisted treatment and to recognize a patient as having an OUD. While taking buprenorphine, the patient should have more frequent oral health care appointments, including home care instructions and caries risk assessment to monitor for caries and xerostomia so that treatment, if indicated, could be initiated as soon as possible. In addition, the dentist's role in OUD is to make sure patients follow the treatment recommendations and use the buprenorphine and to not have them discontinue because of potential caries risk.

Buprenorphine Use for Analgesia in Palliative Care

Buprenorphine is a semi-synthetic long-acting partial µ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist that can be used for chronic pain as a sublingual tablet, transdermal patch (Butrans®), or a buccal film (Belbuca®). Buprenorphine's unique high receptor binding affinity and slow dissociation at the MOR allow for effective analgesia while offering less adverse effects compared to a full agonist opioid, in particular, less concern for respiratory depression and constipation. It is underused in chronic pain and palliative care due to misconceptions and stigma from its use in opioid use disorder (OUD). This case report discusses the unique pharmacology of buprenorphine, including its advantages, disadvantages, available formulations, drug-drug interactions, initiation and conversion strategies, and identifies ideal populations for use, especially within the palliative care patient population.

Non-scheduled short-acting opioid to taper off opioids?

This commentary discusses the issues related to the current pharmacotherapy using super long-acting opioids (for the potential convenience for both patients and medical providers) for opioid addiction and argues for the potential to use a non-scheduled short-acting opioid to taper off opioids to reduce total number of patients on opioids and ultimately reduce opioid-related death. This article also proposes to develop short-acting opioids for addiction management instead of the current long-acting regimen. The authors further suggest that dezocine, a previously FDA approved medication for perioperative pain management and a non-scheduled opioid, be brought back to clinical practice in the US as a potential alternative addiction management medication, especially for those who are highly motivated to quit opioids completely using a taper off strategy.

Considerations and limitations of buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder in the intensive care unit setting: A narrative review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to discuss important considerations when prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, recognizing the challenges of providing detailed recommendations in the setting of limited available evidence.

SUMMARY

Buprenorphine is a partial mu-opioid receptor agonist that is likely to be increasingly prescribed for OUD in the ICU setting due to the relaxation of prescribing regulations. The pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine are complicated by the availability of several formulations that can be given by different administration routes. There is no single optimal dosing strategy for buprenorphine induction, with regimens ranging from very low-dose to high dose regimens. Faster induction with higher doses of buprenorphine has been studied and is frequently utilized in the emergency department. In patients admitted to the ICU who were receiving opioids either medically or illicitly, analgesia will not occur until their baseline opioid requirements are covered when their preadmission opioid is either reversed or interrupted. For patients in the ICU who are not on buprenorphine at the time of admission but have possible OUD, there are no validated tools to diagnose OUD or the severity of opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients unable to provide the subjective components of instruments validated in outpatient settings. When prescribing buprenorphine in the ICU, important issues to consider include dosing, monitoring, pain management, use of adjunctive medications, and considerations to transition to outpatient therapy. Ideally, addiction and pain management specialists would be available when buprenorphine is prescribed for critically ill patients.

CONCLUSION

There are unique challenges when prescribing buprenorphine for OUD in critically ill patients, regardless of whether they were receiving buprenorphine when admitted to the ICU setting for OUD or are under consideration for buprenorphine initiation. There is a critical need for more research in this area.

Overview of best practices for buprenorphine initiation in the emergency department

In recent decades, opioid overdoses have increased dramatically in the United States and peer countries. Given this, emergency medicine physicians have become adept in reversing and managing complications of acute overdose. However, many remain unfamiliar with initiating medication for opioid use disorder such as buprenorphine, a high-affinity partial opioid agonist. Emergency department-based buprenorphine initiation is supported by a significant body of literature demonstrating a marked reduction in mortality in addition to increased engagement in care. Buprenorphine initiation is also safe, given both the pharmacologic properties of buprenorphine that reduce the risk of diversion or recreational use, and previously published literature demonstrating low rates of respiratory depression, sedation, and precipitated withdrawal. Further, barriers to emergency department-based initiation have been reduced in recent years, with publicly available dosing and up-titration schedules, numerous publications overviewing best practices for managing precipitated withdrawal, and removal of USA policies previously restricting patient access and provider prescribing, with the removal of the X-waiver via the Medication Access and Training Expansion Act. Despite reductions in barriers, buprenorphine initiation in the emergency room remains underutilized. Poor uptake has been attributed to numerous individual and systemic barriers, including inadequate education, provider stigma, and insufficient access to outpatient follow-up care. The following practice innovation aims to summarize previously published evidence-based best practices and provide an accessible, user-friendly initiation guide to increase emergency physician comfortability with buprenorphine initiation going forward.

(RE-)AIMing for Rapid Uptake: Pilot Evaluation of a Modified Hub and Spoke Model of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is an effective, evidence-based treatment, but significant gaps in implementation remain. We evaluate one novel approach to address this gap: a Hub and Spoke model to increase buprenorphine access and management.

METHODS

This outcome evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using secondary data analysis of clinical and administrative data to characterize program outcomes for program Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, and Maintenance. Implementation was assessed through a chart review of provider progress notes and through key informant interviews with program staff to understand why this site was able to introduce a novel approach to MOUD.

RESULTS

Nearly half of patients with opioid use disorder (45.48%, n=156) were reached by the program over 2 years. Of those, 91.67% had 1 or more program visits after an initial intake appointment, and 78.85% had a buprenorphine prescription. Patients in the program were 2.44 times more likely to have a buprenorphine prescription than those in comparator site that did not have a Hub and Spoke program (95% CI: 1.77-3.37; P <0.001). There was significantly greater program reach in year 1 than year 2, suggesting rapid initial uptake followed by modest program growth. Key informant interviews illustrated several themes regrading program implementation, including the importance of process champions, the beneficial impact of MOUD for patients, and addressing facility performance metrics. A supportive organizational culture and a receptive climate were also key factors for implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

This program led to rapid improvement in MOUD uptake across the facility. Future efforts should focus on improving program maintenance, including supporting the exchange of patients from the hub to appropriate spokes.

Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain Management: a Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to educate healthcare professionals regarding buprenorphine for the use of opioid use disorder (OUD) as well as for chronic pain management. This review provides physicians and practitioners with updated information regarding the distinct characteristics and intricacies of prescribing buprenorphine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Buprenorphine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute pain, chronic pain, opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid dependence. When compared to most other opioids, buprenorphine offers superior patient tolerability, an excellent half-life, and minimal respiratory depression. Buprenorphine does have notable side effects as well as pharmacokinetic properties that require special attention, especially if patients require future surgical interventions. Many physicians are not trained to initiate or manage patients on buprenorphine. However, buprenorphine offers a potentially safer alternative for medication management for patients who require chronic opioid therapy for pain or have OUD. This review provides updated information on buprenorphine for both chronic pain and OUD.

Legislative and regulatory barriers to pharmacies dispensing buprenorphine for OUD

INTRODUCTION

Buprenorphine (BUP) is increasingly recognized and utilized as a valuable medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder. This article focuses on the problem of regulatory restrictions on access to buprenorphine products without naloxone (mono-product), involving patients in one geographic area, but which may represent a more general access problem in the United States.

DESIGN

In response to an audit by the Tennessee Board of Pharmacy, a pharmacy in northeast Tennessee designed a questionnaire to survey patient motivation for traveling long distances to fill their prescriptions for BUP, rather than buprenorphine/naloxone (BNx, combo-product), and to document their satisfaction with treatment with the mono-product.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were submitted by 194 patients, living in northeast Tennessee, southwest Virginia, and southeast Kentucky. Significant, intolerable, side effects were reported by all patients in the survey prescribed BNx, but because of legislative and regulatory restrictions in their respective states, they were unable to obtain BUP closer to home. Consequently, they were required to drive significant distances from their homes to fill their prescriptions, a median distance of 52 miles, and in some cases as far as 216 miles round trip. Intolerable reactions included severe headaches, nausea and vomiting, allergies, and severe dysphoria. All patients tolerated BUP and were clinically well maintained on the mono-product.

CONCLUSION

Severe, intolerable reactions/side effects from the naloxone component of BNx are not uncommon, but legislative and regulatory restrictions on the mono-product prohibit providers and pharmacies in some states from prescribing and dispensing BUP. The participants in this qualitative study found it necessary to travel significant distances to obtain their prescribed medication, thereby potentially limiting access to this life-saving therapy.

An Examination of the Complex Pharmacological Properties of the Non-Selective Opioid Modulator Buprenorphine

The goal of this review is to provide a recent examination of the pharmacodynamics as well as pharmacokinetics, misuse potential, toxicology, and prenatal consequences of buprenorphine. Buprenorphine is currently a Schedule III opioid in the US used for opioid-use disorder (OUD) and as an analgesic. Buprenorphine has high affinity for the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR) and intermediate affinity for the nociceptin (NOR). Buprenorphine's active metabolite, norbuprenorphine, crosses the blood-brain barrier, is a potent metabolite that attenuates the analgesic effects of buprenorphine due to binding to NOR, and is responsible for the respiratory depressant effects. The area under the concentration curves are very similar for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, which indicates that it is important to consider this metabolite. Crowding sourcing has identified a buprenorphine street value (USD 3.95/mg), indicating some non-medical use. There have also been eleven-thousand reports involving buprenorphine and minors (age < 19) at US poison control centers. Prenatal exposure to clinically relevant dosages in rats produces reductions in myelin and increases in depression-like behavior. In conclusion, the pharmacology of this OUD pharmacotherapy including the consequences of prenatal buprenorphine exposure in humans and experimental animals should continue to be carefully evaluated.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Supports Initiation Treatment and Bridging from Sublingual Buprenorphine to Subcutaneous Administration of a Buprenorphine Depot (CAM2038) in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In treating opioid use disorder (OUD), subcutaneous (SC) extended-release buprenorphine (BPN) depots, e.g., CAM2038, have been shown to provide smaller and less frequent fluctuations in BPN plasma concentrations and pharmacodynamic responses, improve outcomes, reduce treatment burden, and lower risks of misuse and diversion compared to daily sublingual (SL) BPN. This analysis characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BPN following intravenous and SL administration, and administration of SC CAM2038 weekly and monthly.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data from two Phase 1 and two Phase 2 trials in healthy participants and participants with OUD, respectively, were used to develop a population PK model using non-linear mixed effects modelling. The analysis included data from 252 participants and 10,658 BPN observations.

RESULTS

The disposition of BPN was best described by a three-compartment model with first-order elimination, and absorption of SL BPN and SC CAM2038 weekly and monthly by dual parallel absorption pathways. Model diagnostics indicated good predictive performance of BPN concentrations. Buprenorphine plasma concentration-time profiles were simulated for treatment initiation, switching from SL BPN to CAM2038 weekly and monthly, and tapering after interrupting treatment with CAM2038. Simulations predicted CAM2038 weekly and monthly doses that provided BPN plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) and trough concentration (Ctrough) values at steady state within those observed following SL BPN administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This population PK model supports the use of CAM2038 doses as individualized treatment for OUD across different treatment stages, including initiation, switching from SL BPN according to established dose conversion schedules, and tapering.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

ISRCTN41550730 (05/19/2014), ISRCTN24987553 (07/29/2014), NCT02611752 (11/23/2015), NCT02710526 (03/16/2016).

Long-Acting Buprenorphine Formulations as a New Strategy for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

Long-acting buprenorphine formulations have been recently marketed for the Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) of opioid use disorder (OUD) associated with medical, social, and psychological support. Their duration of action ranges from one week up to 6 months. The non-medical use of opioids is increasing with a parallel rise in lethal overdoses. Methadone and buprenorphine are the standard treatment for opioid dependence. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing the risks of overdose, crime, and transmission of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) in people who use opioids; however, its effectiveness has been hindered by low rates of uptake and retention in treatment. Furthermore, both methadone and buprenorphine are widely diverted and misused. Thus, a crucial aspect of treating OUD is facilitating patients' access to treatment while minimizing substance-related harm and improving quality of life. The newly developed long-acting buprenorphine formulations represent a significant change in the paradigm of OUD treatment, allowing an approach individualized to patients' needs. Strengths of this individualized approach are improved adherence (lack of peaks and troughs in blood concentrations) and a reduced stigma since the patient doesn't need to attend their clinic daily or nearly daily, thus facilitating social and occupational integrations as the quality of life. However, less frequent attendance at the clinic should not affect the patient-physician relationship. Therefore, teleconsulting or digital therapeutic services should be developed in parallel. In addition, diversion and intravenous misuse of buprenorphine are unlikely due to the characteristics of these formulations. These features make this approach of interest for treating OUD in particular settings, such as subjects staying or when released from prison or those receiving long-term residential treatment for OUD in the therapeutic communities. The long-lasting formulations of buprenorphine can positively impact the OUD treatment and suggest future medical and logistic developments to maximize their personalized management and impact.

A Need for Further Education on Buprenorphine in Pain Medicine

With the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States there has been a strong transition towards utilizing multi-modal analgesia, interventional procedures, and non-opioid medications when managing acute and chronic pain. There has also been an increased interest in utilizing buprenorphine. Buprenorphine is a novel long-acting analgesic with partial mu-opioid agonist activity that can be utilized for analgesia as well as opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine also has a unique set of side effects as well pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that require special attention, especially if these patients require future surgical interventions. Given the increased interest in this medication we believe that there needs to be increased education and awareness regarding this medication amongst physicians, specifically pain management physicians and trainees.