1
|
Wegman-Ostrosky T, Taja-Chayeb L, Zatarain-Barrón ZL, Trejo-Becerril C, Shveid Gerson D, Espino-Gutiérrez I, Gutiérrez-Lara A, Bonilla Salcedo AY, Castellanos Mares M, García-Ortiz JE, Robles-Espinoza CD, Ruíz-Patiño A. Somatic Landscape of Oncogenic Variants Across the Main Cancer Subtypes in Latin America: A Narrative Review. JCO Glob Oncol 2025; 11:e2400389. [PMID: 40020217 DOI: 10.1200/go-24-00389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 05/12/2025] Open
Abstract
Variations in somatic genetic alterations can be observed across different cancer types and diverse populations. Understanding the frequency of oncogenic variants in specific populations helps elucidate carcinogenesis and risk factors, with somatic variants often serving as treatment markers. Data regarding the somatic landscape across the main tumor subtypes in patients from Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) have increased recently, highlighting important differences from contrasting populations in North America, Europe, and Asia. Many of these differences have pressing implications regarding screening, risk factor management, targeted therapies, and health care policy. This review aims to synthesize the existing information on somatic oncogenic variants in patients' tumors from LAC. We included the frequency of somatic oncogenic variants of the most frequent tumors in LAC: prostate cancer, female breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer. Furthermore, we add information from tumors that are relevant in LAC because of their high incidence, specific subtypes, or aggressive phenotypes, namely gallbladder cancer, acral melanoma, and hematologic neoplasms, respectively. The data highlight distinct differences in the reported prevalences of various somatic variants across a spectrum of neoplasms. Moreover, it demonstrates that an extensive number of genetic and molecular studies have been carried out in the region, improving the level of characterization for this complex, admixed population. Nonetheless, data from many individual countries are still scarce or altogether missing, underscoring the need to establish collaborative groups to further advance progress in LAC. The need for further comprehensive research in the area should not be substituted with data from other regions as we seek to empower the choices to improve our health care outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Wegman-Ostrosky
- Precision Medicine Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lucia Taja-Chayeb
- Precision Medicine Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - José Elias García-Ortiz
- División de Genética, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara Jalisco, México
| | - Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza
- Laboratorio Internacional de Investigación sobre el Genoma Humano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico
| | - Alejandro Ruíz-Patiño
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research-FICMAC, Bogotá, Colombia
- Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center-CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia
- OncolGroup-Universidad del Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gorbokon N, Wößner N, Lennartz M, Dwertmann Rico S, Kind S, Reiswich V, Viehweger F, Lutz F, Fraune C, Luebke AM, Hube-Magg C, Menz A, Schlichter R, Krech T, Hinsch A, Burandt E, Sauter G, Simon R, Steurer S, Marx AH, Lebok P, Dum D, Minner S, Jacobsen F, Clauditz TS, Hackert T, Uzunoǧlu FG, Bubendorf L, Bernreuther C, Kluth M. Prevalence of S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine Phosphorylase (MTAP) Deficiency in Human Cancer: A Tissue Microarray Study on 13,067 Tumors From 149 Different Tumor Types. Am J Surg Pathol 2024; 48:1245-1258. [PMID: 39132873 PMCID: PMC11404761 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Loss of S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) expression is a common event in cancer leading to a critical vulnerability of cancer cells towards anti-cancer drugs. Homozygous MTAP deletions result in a complete expression loss that can be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this study, a tissue microarray containing 17,078 samples from 149 different tumor entities was analyzed by IHC, and complete MTAP loss was validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. MTAP loss was observed in 83 of 149 tumor categories, including neuroendocrine neoplasms (up to 80%), Hodgkin lymphoma (50.0%), mesothelioma (32.0% to 36.8%), gastro-intestinal adenocarcinoma (4.0% to 40.5%), urothelial neoplasms (10.5% to 36.7%), squamous cell carcinomas (up to 38%), and various types of sarcomas (up to 20%) and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (up to 14%). Homozygous MTAP deletion was found in 90% to 100% of cases with MTAP expression loss in most tumor categories. However, neuroendocrine tumors, Hodgkin lymphomas, and other lymphomas lacked MTAP deletions. MTAP deficiency was significantly linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype in selected tumor entities and the presence of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, absence of PD-L1 expression on immune cells, and a low density of CD8 + lymphocytes. In summary, MTAP deficiency can occur in various tumor entities and is linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype and noninflamed tumor microenvironment, but is not always related to deletions. MTAP IHC is of considerable diagnostic value for the detection of neoplastic transformation in multiple different applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Gorbokon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niklas Wößner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Dwertmann Rico
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kind
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Reiswich
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Viehweger
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Lutz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Fraune
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas M Luebke
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Menz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ria Schlichter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Krech
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hinsch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eike Burandt
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas H Marx
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhügel, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Patrick Lebok
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David Dum
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jacobsen
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till S Clauditz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Jakob-Henle-Straße, Fürth, Germany
| | - Faik G Uzunoǧlu
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Jakob-Henle-Straße, Fürth, Germany
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Schönbeinstrasse, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Bernreuther
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang Y, Wu Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Xu G, Deng Y, Han L, Li E, Ma Q, Xu M, Wu Z, Wang Z. Loss of chromosome 9p21 is associated with a poor prognosis in adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas. PRECISION CLINICAL MEDICINE 2023; 6:pbad030. [PMID: 38024139 PMCID: PMC10681361 DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a rare histological subtype of pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis and a high metastasis rate. However, little is known about its genomic landscape and prognostic biomarkers. A total of 48 ASCP specimens and 98 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumour specimens were sequenced to explore the genomic landscape and prognostic biomarkers. The homozygous deletion of the 9p21.3 region (including CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP) (9p21 loss) occurred in both ASCP and PDAC, and a higher frequency of 9p21 loss was observed in ASCP (12.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.022). Notably, 9p21 loss was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) in ASCP patients (mDFS (Median DFS) = 4.17 vs 7.33 months, HR (Hazard Ratio) = 3.70, P = 0.009). The most common gene alterations in patients with ASCP were KRAS (96%), TP53 (81%), CDKN2A (42%), SMAD4 (21%), CDKN2B (13%), and FAT3 (13%). The mutation rates of ACVR2A (6.25% vs 0%), FANCA (6.25% vs 0%), RBM10 (6.25% vs 0%), and SPTA1 (8.33% vs 1.02%) were significantly higher in ASCP than in PDAC. In conclusion, we have comprehensively described the genomic landscape of the largest cohort of ASCP patients to date and highlight that 9p21 loss may be a promising prognostic biomarker for ASCP, which provides a molecular basis for prognosis prediction and new therapeutic strategies for ASCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yina Jiang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Yinying Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | | | - Yan Wang
- OrigiMed Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201114, China
| | - Guiping Xu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Yuan Deng
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Liang Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Enxiao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Qingyong Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Mian Xu
- OrigiMed Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201114, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
- Pancreatic disease treatment center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 70061, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spiliopoulou P, Yang SC, Bruce JP, Wang BX, Berman HK, Pugh TJ, Siu LL. All is not lost: learning from 9p21 loss in cancer. Trends Immunol 2022; 43:379-390. [DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
5
|
Eichenauer T, Simmendinger L, Kluth M, Chirico V, Luebke AM, Höflmayer D, Hinsch A, Jacobsen F, Hube-Magg C, Möller-Koop C, Dahlem R, Fisch M, Rink M, Riechardt S, Tsourlakis MC, Büscheck F, Bernreuther C, Clauditz T, Lebok P, Simon R, Sauter G, Wilczak W, Fraune C. Chromosomal deletion of 9p21 is linked to poor patient prognosis in papillary and clear cell kidney cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:605.e1-605.e8. [PMID: 32241691 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ongoing approval of adjuvant systemic therapy in high-risk kidney tumor will increase the demand for prognostic assessment in these tumors. 9p21 deletion has been suggested as a possible prognostic feature in clear cell kidney cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS To learn more on the prognostic relevance of 9p21 deletions in clear cell and other kidney tumors, 1,809 kidney tumor specimens were analyzed by dual-labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for 9p21 and centromere 9 in a tissue microarray format. Results were compared to histologic tumor type, pT stage, grade, and patient outcome. RESULTS A total of 1,341 (74%) of tumor samples had interpretable FISH results. 9p21 deletion was found in 4.4% of 894 clear cell, 5.1% of 197 papillary, and 4.2% of 71 chromophobe carcinomas. 9p21 deletions were not found in 112 oncocytomas and in 21 clear cell tubulo-papillary cancers. In clear cell carcinomas, 9p deletions were associated with advanced stage (P = 0.009) and nodal metastasis (P = 0.0067), but not with ISUP grade (P = 0.1039) and distant metastasis (P = 0.4809). Also, in papillary carcinomas, 9p deletions were associated with advanced stage (P = 0.0008) and nodal metastasis (P = 0.0202) but not with ISUP grade (0.0904) and distant metastasis (P = 0.2022). Follow-up data were available for 789 clear cell and 177 papillary cancers. In both tumor entities, 9p21 deletions were associated with shortened overall survival, tumor-specific death, and progression-free survival in univariate analysis (P < 0.02 each). In a multivariate analysis, 9p21 deletion was an independent predictor of early tumor recurrence (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION 9p21 deletions, 9p21 deletions identify a small subset of aggressive renal carcinomas. 9p deletion assessment may be clinically useful to identify high-risk renal cell carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Eichenauer
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luca Simmendinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Victoria Chirico
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas M Luebke
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Doris Höflmayer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hinsch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jacobsen
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Möller-Koop
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roland Dahlem
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silke Riechardt
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Franziska Büscheck
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Bernreuther
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Clauditz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Lebok
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Waldemar Wilczak
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Fraune
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eggener SE, Rumble RB, Armstrong AJ, Morgan TM, Crispino T, Cornford P, van der Kwast T, Grignon DJ, Rai AJ, Agarwal N, Klein EA, Den RB, Beltran H. Molecular Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:1474-1494. [PMID: 31829902 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides recommendations for available tissue-based prostate cancer biomarkers geared toward patient selection for active surveillance, identification of clinically significant disease, choice of postprostatectomy adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy, and to address emerging questions such as the relative value of tissue biomarkers compared with magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS An ASCO multidisciplinary Expert Panel, with representatives from the European Association of Urology, American Urological Association, and the College of American Pathologists, conducted a systematic literature review of localized prostate cancer biomarker studies between January 2013 and January 2019. Numerous tissue-based molecular biomarkers were evaluated for their prognostic capabilities and potential for improving management decisions. Here, the Panel makes recommendations regarding the clinical use and indications of these biomarkers. RESULTS Of 555 studies identified, 77 were selected for inclusion plus 32 additional references selected by the Expert Panel. Few biomarkers had rigorous testing involving multiple cohorts and only 5 of these tests are commercially available currently: Oncotype Dx Prostate, Prolaris, Decipher, Decipher PORTOS, and ProMark. With various degrees of value and validation, multiple biomarkers have been shown to refine risk stratification and can be considered for select men to improve management decisions. There is a paucity of prospective studies assessing short- and long-term outcomes of patients when these markers are integrated into clinical decision making. RECOMMENDATIONS Tissue-based molecular biomarkers (evaluating the sample with the highest volume of the highest Gleason pattern) may improve risk stratification when added to standard clinical parameters, but the Expert Panel endorses their use only in situations in which the assay results, when considered as a whole with routine clinical factors, are likely to affect a clinical decision. These assays are not recommended for routine use as they have not been prospectively tested or shown to improve long-term outcomes-for example, quality of life, need for treatment, or survival. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Todd M Morgan
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Alex J Rai
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rosolen DCB, Faria DK, Faria CS, Antonangelo L. Performance of the UroVysion ® FISH assay for the diagnosis of malignant effusions using two cutoff strategies. Cancer Med 2018; 7:1967-1977. [PMID: 29577646 PMCID: PMC5943432 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytological examination of cavity fluids has limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignancy. Aneuploidy, which is commonly observed in neoplastic cells, could potentially be used as an ancillary diagnostic tool. To evaluate the detection of aneuploid cells in cavitary effusion samples using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay UroVysion® with some adaptations and two different cutoff strategies. Seventy samples of pleural or peritoneal fluid with positive (n = 40), negative (n = 15), or suspicious (n = 15) oncotic cytology were subjected to FISH assay with the multitarget UroVysion® kit, which is composed of probes that hybridize to the centromeric region of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and to the locus 9p21. FISH performance was evaluated using two different cutoffs: (1) the manufacturer's cutoff (M‐FISH) and 2) a proposed cutoff (P‐FISH). Using M‐FISH, the diagnostic sensitivity was 57.1%, specificity 87.5%, and accuracy 60.0%; with P‐FISH, the sensitivity was 87.3%, specificity 71.4%, and accuracy 85.7%. When combined with cytology, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.0%, 83.3%, and 87.8%, respectively. Malignant cells presented a predominance of chromosomal gains. The UroVysion® test using the P‐FISH cutoff was effective in demonstrating aneuploid cells in all malignant effusions, confirming the diagnosis of malignancy even in cases with suspicious cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Débora C B Rosolen
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel K Faria
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caroline S Faria
- Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leila Antonangelo
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|