The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of ambulatory care for patients with chronic neurological diseases in Japan: Evaluation of an administrative claims database

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization and cost for care of pediatric and young adult ALL

OBJECTIVE

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy and among the most common malignancies in young adults and requires a unique pattern of healthcare utilization including an acute/emergent presentation and an intensive initial 8 months of therapy followed by two years of outpatient treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic caused massive global disruptions in healthcare use and delivery. This report aims to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and continued management of childhood and young adult ALL in regard to utilization and cost of care among commercially insured individuals in the United States.

RESULTS

Utilizing a commercial insurance claims database, 529 pediatric and young adult patients were identified who were diagnosed with ALL between January 2016 and March 2021. New diagnoses were evaluated by era and demographics. Utilization was measured by COVID-related era as number of inpatient and outpatient encounters, inpatient days, and cumulative cost during the initial 8 months of therapy. None of these cost or utilization factors changed significantly during or shortly after the pandemic. These findings reinforce that the necessary care for pediatric and young adult ALL was unwavering despite the massive shifts in the healthcare system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This provides a valuable benchmark as we further examine the factors that influence the pandemic's impact on health equity and access to care, especially in vulnerable pediatric and young adult populations. This is the first investigation of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization and cost of care in pediatric and young adult cancer.

Outcome of emergency patients transported by ambulance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Osaka Prefecture, Japan: a population-based descriptive study

Background

The novel corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic occurred worldwide. Although an excessive burden was placed on emergency medical institutions treating urgent and severe patients, its impact on patient outcome remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 on the emergency medical services (EMS) system and patient outcomes in Osaka Prefecture, Japan.

Methods

This was a retrospective descriptive study with a study period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. We included patients who were transported by ambulance and had cleaned data that was recorded in the ORION system. The study endpoints were the number of patients transported by ambulance and the number of deaths among these patients in each month. To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the EMS system, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using 2019 as the reference year. Mortalities were evaluated based on deaths in the emergency department and deaths at 21 days after hospitalization.

Results

The numbers of patients transported by ambulance were 500,194 in 2019, 443,321 in 2020 (IRR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.87-0.88), and 448,054 in 2021 (IRR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.89-0.90). In 2019, the number of patients transported by ambulance and who died in the emergency departments was 4,980, compared to 5,485 in 2020 (IRR: 1.10, 95% CI; 1.06-1.44) and 5,925 in 2021 (IRR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.15-1.24). In 2019, the number of patients who died within 21 days after hospitalization was 11,931, compared to 11,913 in 2020 (IRR; 1.00, 95% CI; 0.98-1.03) and 13,376 in 2021 (IRR; 1.12, 95% CI; 1.09-1.15).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic decreased the number of ambulance requests and worsened mortality of patients transported by ambulance in Osaka Prefecture during 2021.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization and Cost for Care of Pediatric ALL

Objective

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy and requires a unique pattern of healthcare utilization including an acute/emergent presentation and an intensive initial 8 months of therapy followed by two years of outpatient treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic caused massive global disruptions in healthcare use and delivery. This report aims to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and continued management of childhood ALL in regard to utilization and cost of care.

Results

Utilizing a commercial insurance claims database, 529 pediatric patients were identified who were diagnosed with ALL and completed their initial 8 months of treatment between January 2016 and December 2021. New diagnoses were evaluated by era and demographics. Utilization was measured by COVID-related era as number of inpatient and outpatient encounters, inpatient days, and cumulative cost. None of these cost or utilization factors changed significantly during or shortly after the pandemic. These findings reinforce that the necessary care for pediatric ALL is largely inflexible and was unwavering despite the massive shifts in the healthcare system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This provides a valuable benchmark as we further examine the factors that influence the pandemic's impact on health equity and access to care, especially in vulnerable pediatric populations. This is the first investigation of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization and cost of care in pediatric cancer.

Adherence of denosumab treatment for low bone mineral density in Japanese people living with HIV: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Long-term care issues, specifically metabolic bone disorders, are a concern for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) who undergo life-long antiretroviral therapy (ART). Previous clinical trials with denosumab, an anti-RANKL antibody inhibitor, have revealed its effectiveness in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with osteoporosis. However, there are limited data on adherence and effectiveness of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in PLWH. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the adherence and effectiveness of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in Japanese PLWH.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective exploratory analysis of 29 Japanese PLWH who initiated denosumab treatment for osteoporosis, between 2013 and 2021. The study included patients who received at least one dose of denosumab every 6 months. Adherence and persistence were defined as receiving two consecutive injections of denosumab 6 months ± 4 weeks apart and 6 months + 8 weeks apart, respectively. The primary outcome measure of the study was the adherence of denosumab treatment for 24 months. The secondary outcome measures included treatment persistence and BMD. The period after January 2020 was defined as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period, and its impact on adherence was investigated.

RESULTS

The treatment adherence rates at 12 and 24 months were 89.7% and 60.7%, respectively. By contrast, the treatment persistence at 12 and 24 months was 100% and 85.7%, respectively. More patients in the group who initiated denosumab treatment after the COVID-19 pandemic reached non-adherence than in the group who initiated denosumab treatment before the pandemic. BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck significantly increased compared to that at baseline, with median percentage changes of 8.7% (p < 0.001) and 3.5% (p = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that patients in the study had a high rate of non-adherence but a lower rate of non-persistence. Additionally, PLWH on ongoing ART experienced increased BMD with denosumab treatment. This study provides an opportunity to improve future strategies for denosumab treatment in the Japanese PLWH.

A new emergency during the latest phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: access to healthcare services by patients with non-communicable diseases

Background

The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare and the disease management of patients affected by non-communicable diseases (NCDs), by exploring, specifically, the obstacles encountered in the access to healthcare services during the latest phase of the pandemic.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out among subjects attending the anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccination clinic in a Teaching Hospital of Southern Italy. To be included in the study, subjects had to be affected by at least one NCD, such as diabetes, hypertension, respiratory and heart diseases, renal and liver chronic conditions, immunodeficiency disorders due to cancer, or being kidney or liver transplant recipients.

Results

Among the 553 subjects who completed the questionnaire, the 39.4% (95% IC = 35.3-43.6) experienced obstacles in the access to healthcare services in the six months prior to the enrollment. The most frequent canceled/postponed healthcare services were the visits for routine checks for NCDs (60.6, 95% IC = 53.9-67), control visits of more complex diseases as cancer or transplantation (17.3, 95% IC = 12.6-22.8), and scheduled surgery (11.5, 95% IC = 7.7-16.4). The patients who experienced canceled/postponed healthcare services were significantly more likely to suffer from 3 or more NCDs (p = 0.042), to be diabetics (p = 0.038), to have immunodeficiency disorders (p = 0.028) and to have consulted GP at least once (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Our results appear to be fundamental for guiding the choices of providers in order to concentrate organizational efforts to recover and reschedule missed appointments, where applicable, of the most fragile patients by virtue of age and chronic conditions.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient care and rehabilitation in neuromuscular clinical practice in Japan: a health insurance claims database analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient care in Japanese patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs).

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included patients between January 2018 and February 2019; the follow-up period was divided into 'before COVID-19' (March 2019-February 2020) and 'during COVID-19' (March 2020-February 2021).

SETTING

JMDC claims database study.

PARTICIPANTS

Of the 10 655 557 patients identified, we included patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA; n=82), neuromyelitis optica (NMO; n=342), myasthenia gravis (MG; n=1347), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS; n=442) or autoimmune encephalitis/encephalopathy (AIE; n=133). Patients were required to have ≥1 month of data available, have a diagnosis of NMD during the enrolment period and be available for follow-up.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

We estimated the proportion of patients with >30% change in outpatient consultation and rehabilitation visits before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Small reductions in the proportion of patients with outpatient consultation/rehabilitation visits were observed before versus during the pandemic. Compared with before the pandemic, 30.4%, 27.8%, 28.7%, 49.4% and 50.0% of patients showed a >30% decrease in outpatient consultation visits and 58.6%, 75.0%, 50.0%, 76.3% and 84.6% showed a >30% decrease in outpatient rehabilitation visits during the pandemic for SMA, NMO, MG, GBS and AIE, respectively. The median change in the number of outpatient consultation visits per year before versus during pandemic was -1.0 day for all NMDs, and that in outpatient rehabilitation visits per year was -6.0, -5.5, -1.5, -6.5 and -9.0 days for SMA, NMO, MG, GBS and AIE, respectively. The reduction in outpatient rehabilitation visits was greater in the absence versus presence of a neurology specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient consultation and rehabilitation visits during the COVID-19 pandemic were affected in Japanese patients with NMDs. Longer-term evaluations are required to understand if these reductions in outpatient care would affect patient prognosis.

The prevalence of end-of-life chemotherapy and targeted therapy in Japan, assessed using a health claims database

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the current status of end-of-life chemotherapy and targeted therapy and explore the aggressiveness of end-of-life care in Japan using the DeSC database, a large administrative claims database.

METHODS

We identified fatal cases of at least one cancer-related diagnosis between April 2015 and November 2020. Patients prescribed at least one anticancer drug were analyzed, and chemotherapy regimens were categorized based on the combination of concomitant anticancer drugs prescribed.

RESULTS

Among 1,095,713 individuals enrolled in the National Health Insurance database, 7,300 deaths with cancer-related diagnosis were identified. Of these, 4,010 cases were identified in which at least one anticancer drug was prescribed, and 11.6% of 7,300 death had been prescribed anticancer drugs in their last 30 days of life. The most commonly used regimen was S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium combination) monotherapy, followed by nivolumab monotherapy and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy was more likely prescribed to patients whose last chemotherapy dose was in the last 30 days of life (p = 0.0066, chi-squared test).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into the current status of end-of-life chemotherapy and targeted therapy in Japan, using a large administrative claims database. The results of this study will inform future research on end-of-life chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and help develop strategies to improve the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer.

Comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of different long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) (aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and fluphenazine/haloperidol) in patients with schizophrenia in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two administrative claims databases. The study population consisted of outpatients with schizophrenia who initiated LAIs between May 1, 2015, and November 30, 2019. We directly compared the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and LAI discontinuation among the LAIs based on hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The numbers of eligible patients who initiated aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and fluphenazine/haloperidol were 303, 124, 73, and 123, respectively. Regarding psychiatric hospitalization, aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with significantly lower risk compared to fluphenazine/haloperidol (HR of aripiprazole: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.78, HR of paliperidone: 0.50, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.89); HR of risperidone showed the same trend as the aripiprazole and paliperidone. Regarding LAI discontinuation, aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with significantly lower risk of LAI discontinuation compared to fluphenazine/haloperidol (HR of aripiprazole: 0.53, 95 % CI: 95 % CI: 0.35-0.80, HR of paliperidone: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.35-0.92). Aripiprazole was also associated with a significantly lower risk compared to risperidone (HR: 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that aripiprazole and paliperidone are superior to fluphenazine/haloperidol in the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and LAI discontinuation. Aripiprazole is superior to risperidone in the risk of LAI discontinuation.

Comparison of bleeding following gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy in patients treated with and without direct oral anticoagulants

Background and study aims  Despite the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the association between DOAC use and complications (e. g., bleeding) following gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate complications after biopsy in patients treated with DOACs in Japan, where biopsies would be generally performed without DOAC withdrawal based on guideline recommendations. Patients and methods  Using a Japanese nationwide database, we identified patients taking DOACs who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy (n  = 2,769, DOAC group) and those not taking DOACs (n = 129,357, control group) from April 2015 to November 2020. We conducted 1:4 propensity score (PS) matching and overlap PS-weighting analyses with adjustment for background characteristics to compare occurrence of post-procedure hemorrhage and stroke within 1 week after biopsy, and thrombin use on the day of biopsy without a diagnosis of hemorrhage. Results  In total, 578 patients (0.44 %) developed post-procedure hemorrhage, and 13 patients (0.01 %) developed stroke. The DOAC group had more comorbidities than the control group. The PS matching analysis revealed no significant differences in post-procedure hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.52 [95 % confidential interval, 0.96-2.41]) or stroke (1.00 [0.21-4.71]), whereas the DOAC group received thrombin more often than the control group (1.60 [1.30-1.95]). The results were equivalent in the overlap PS-weighting analysis. Conclusions  The PS analyses showed no significant differences in complications following gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsy between DOAC users and non-users. These results suggest the safety of endoscopic biopsy without DOAC withdrawal although the need for careful hemostasis remains.

Changes in Access to Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures adopted are having a profound impact on a major goal of public healthcare systems: universal access to health services. The objective is to synthesize the available knowledge on access to health care for non-COVID-19 conditions and to identify knowledge gaps. A scoping review was conducted searching different databases (Medline, Google Scholar, etc.) for original articles published between December 2019 and September 2021. A total of 53 articles were selected and analyzed using the Aday and Andersen framework as a guide. Of these, 37 analyzed changes in levels of use of health services, 15 focused on the influencing factors and barriers to access, and 1 studied both aspects. Most focused on specific diseases and the early stages of the pandemic, based on a review of records. Analyses of the impact on primary care services' use, unmet needs or inequalities in access were scarce. A generalized reduction in the use of health services was described. The most frequent access barrier described for non-COVID-19 conditions related to the services was a lack of resources, while barriers related to the population were predisposing (fear of contagion, stigma, or anticipating barriers) and enabling characteristics (worse socioeconomic status and an increase in technological barriers). In conclusion, our results show a general reduction in services' use in the early stages of the pandemic, as well as new barriers to access and the exacerbation of existing ones. In view of these results, more studies are required on the subsequent stages of the pandemic, to shed more light on the factors that have influenced access and the pandemic's impact on equity of access.