Examining the diagnostic validity of the Berlin Questionnaire in a low-income Black American sample

Prevalence of depression in pediatric patients with diagnosed or at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may increase the risk of depression through various hypothesized mechanisms. Studies regarding this relationship with children are limited. This systematic review aims to assess the prevalence of depression in pediatric patients with OSA. Five electronic databases, grey literature, and reference lists of included studies were systematically searched. Studies reporting the prevalence of depression, as described by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), psychiatric evaluation or other validated screening measures, in children with OSA diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG), or at high risk for OSA based on positive scores on other validated measures were included. The risk of bias was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist for cross-sectional studies. Six studies from three countries and over 2300 pediatric patients were included. This meta-analysis showed an overall 28 % prevalence of depression among children with OSA or at high risk for OSA, which is almost two-fold higher than among children without OSA (controls). Overall, this meta-analysis suggests that around one out of every four children with or at high risk for OSA could have depression, and one in 10 children if OSA has been confirmed by PSG. Screening of OSA in pediatric patients with symptoms of depression and vice versa, screening of depressive symptoms in children with suspected or confirmed OSA, may be valuable areas of focus for multidisciplinary preventative care to optimize psychiatric treatment.

Migraine and sleep apnea, insomnia, and sleep patterns in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the prevalence of migraine and examine its association with sleep disorders, patterns, and symptoms in adults in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). We hypothesized that migraine would be associated with insomnia but not sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND

Sparse research has examined migraine prevalence and sleep comorbidities in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States may be at risk for worse health outcomes due to disparities in health-care access and socioeconomic stressors.

METHODS

We analyzed data collected during the baseline examination (March 2008-June 2011) from the HCHS/SOL, a community-based cohort study of self-identified Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States. The exposure was self-reported medical diagnosis of migraine, and primary outcomes were obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h from at-home sleep testing) and insomnia (≥ 9 on the Women's Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale). Exploratory outcomes included self-reported sleep duration, timing, sleeping pill use, and naps. We compared weighted differences in outcomes by migraine status, adjusting for age and sex in all reported models.

RESULTS

Our analytical sample included HCHS/SOL participants who completed questionnaires on sleep and migraine (16,325). The mean age (standard deviation) was 41.1 (31.7) years, 52.2% identified as female, and 39.5% had a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2. Lifetime prevalence of migraine was 15.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0, 16.8; 23.6% [95% CI: 22.2, 25.0] of females and 7.5% [95% CI:6.6, 8.5] of males). Those with migraine were more likely to be unemployed (50.8% vs. 36.2%) and to have a household yearly income of < $20,000 (50.9% vs. 45.5%). There was no association between migraine and obstructive sleep apnea (odds ratio [OR] 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76, 1.26]) or napping (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.81, 1.06]). Compared to individuals without migraine, those with migraine were more likely to have insomnia (OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.62, 2.15) and to use sleeping pills (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.80, 2.60) in sex- and age-adjusted models. Individuals with migraine also had shorter mean sleep duration (7.88 ± 2.5 h vs. 8.00 ± 2.1 h, β = -0.20; 95% CI: -0.30, -0.09) and later bedtimes (11:28 p.m. ± 5.1 h vs. 11:17 p.m. ± 4.2 h, β = 16.85; 95% CI: 3.58, 30.13; weekdays) in sex- and age-adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported medical diagnosis of migraine is common in Hispanic/Latino adults, especially females. Migraine is not associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Consistent with non-Hispanic/Latino populations, migraine is associated with insomnia in the HCHS/SOL.

Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Veterans and Nonveterans

PURPOSE

Understanding disease prevalence can inform treatment and resource needs across populations. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of sleep apnea (OSA) among veterans and nonveterans.

DESIGN

The national Comparative Health Assessment Interview Study, cross-sectional survey using probability-based sampling frames.

SETTING

Surveys completed by Internet or phone.

SUBJECTS

15,166 veterans (40% response rate) and 4,654 nonveterans (57% response rate).

MEASURES

Self-report of healthcare provider-based diagnosis of OSA.

ANALYSIS

Calculation of prevalence of OSA using statistical weighting to allow for direct comparison between veterans and nonveterans. Secondary analyses evaluated OSA by deployment status among veterans and compared average age of OSA diagnosis and differences in OSA prevalence among veterans and nonveterans stratified by gender, marital status, race/ethnicity, and posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis.

RESULTS

OSA diagnosis was more than twice as prevalent among veterans (21%, 95% CI 20%-22%) than nonveterans (9%, 95% CI 8%-10%; aOR: 2.56, 95% CI 2.22-2.95, P < .001). Deployment was associated with higher odds of OSA among veterans (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.43-18.7, P < 001.) Veterans were diagnosed with OSA on average 5 years earlier than nonveterans.

CONCLUSION

Veterans have a high prevalence rate of OSA, highlighting the importance of veterans' access to treatment. OSA is likely underdiagnosed in nonveterans, particularly among racial/ethnic minoritized groups. Future research should investigate disparities in access to diagnostic testing for racial/ethnic minority nonveterans and/or risk factors for OSA among racial/ethnic minority veterans. The increased odds of OSA among those with PTSD highlights in the importance of early referral for OSA testing by providers as well as development of trauma-informed strategies to promote OSA treatment adherence. Limitations include a bias toward underestimation of true disease prevalence due to self-report of diagnosis.

Diagnostic utility of obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires: a comprehensive meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the accuracy of the Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder (SRBD) Scale in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

METHODS

A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the diagnostic utility of OSA screening questionnaires were performed. Analyses determined the summary receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (SROC), the pooled sensitivity (Se), and the specificity (Sp). Subgroup analysis investigated and compared the summary sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) among the BQ, STOP, and ESS according to the severity of OSA.

RESULTS

34 studies were included. The Berlin questionnaire had a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.48, while the Epworth sleepiness scale had a sensitivity of 0.48 and a specificity of 0.73. The STOP-BANG scale had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.89 and 0.40, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of BQ, ESS, NoSAS, and STOP was evaluated based on OSA severity. BQ and STOP had higher sensitivity and specificity, while ESS had lower specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis indicates that the SRBD scale has acceptable accuracy in detecting patients with OSAS. We propose that the STOP questionnaire could be used as an easy-to-use and accurate screening tool for the identification of patients at risk for OSAS in the general population. ESS had higher specificity, allowing healthcare professionals to prioritize interventions and tailor treatment plans based on OSA severity.

Sleep Apnea Risk, Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Cognitive Performance: Findings from the Boston Latino Aging Study

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. These relations are understudied in ethnoracially diverse groups. We examined associations among self-reported OSA risk, SCD, and cognitive performance in community-dwelling older Latinos. High OSA risk was hypothesized to be associated with greater SCD and worse cognitive performance.

METHODS

112 participants (40 female) from the Boston Latino Aging Study (BLAST) were included (Mage = 67.0 years [SD = 8.0]; Meducation = 11.0 years [SD = 5.1]). Participants completed the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite-5 (PACC5; z-scores), the Berlin Questionnaire (high vs. low OSA risk), and the Cognitive Function Instrument (SCD). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) indexed global cognition. Hierarchical regressions assessed associations among OSA risk, SCD, and cognitive performance while controlling for demographics. t tests examined demographic and cognitive differences between those at high/low OSA risk.

RESULTS

On average, participants had an MMSE score of 25.9 (SD = 3.7, range 11-30; 37 participants with MMSE <26) and mild SCD (CFI; M = 4.2 [3.6]). OSA risk did not predict SCD (β = 0.09, p = 0.33) or PACC5 performance (β = 0.01, p = 0.92). No differences in SCD or PACC5 performance were observed between those at low versus high OSA risk (p's ≥ 0.21).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary findings suggest that self-reported OSA risk may not signal cognitive decline risk for older Latinos. Questionnaires screening for OSA may need to be used in tandem with other assessments to identify those experiencing early cognitive decline. More work with larger sample sizes is needed; BLAST data collection is ongoing.

Assessing the causal associations of sleep apnea with mental health and socioeconomic status: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization

OBJECTIVE

Traditional observational research has suggested a connection between socioeconomic position, mental health, and sleep apnea (SA), but the specifics of this connection are still unclear. Using the Mendelian randomization approach, we intended to evaluate the potential causal link between mental health, socioeconomic status, and SA.

METHODS

Our research employed summary statistics data from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on mental health, socioeconomic status, and SA. In the main study, the connection between mental health, socioeconomic status, and SA was examined using the inverse variance weighted approach. In addition, as a supplement, we also used other Mendelian randomization methods, including MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode.

RESULTS

The primary analysis showed that educational attainment, including longer years of schooling, college or university degree, and higher intelligence was associated with a lower risk of SA (OR = 0.750, 95%CI = 0.653-0.862; OR = 0.558, 95%CI = 0.423-0.735; OR = 0.871, 95%CI = 0.760-0.999, respectively), while social deprivation was associated with a higher risk of SA (OR = 1.821, 95%CI = 1.075-3.085). And the income was not associated with the risk of sleep apnea (OR = 0.877, 95%CI = 0.682-1.129). In mental health exposure, major depressive disorder was associated with a higher risk of sleep apnea (OR = 1.196, 95%CI = 1.015-1.409), while attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia were not associated with the risk of sleep apnea (OR = 1.064, 95%CI = 0.958-1.181; OR = 1.030, 95%CI = 0.942-1.127; OR = 0.990, 95%CI = 0.957-1.025, respectively). Reverse MR analysis failed to find a causal effect from SA on mental health and socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

This MR investigation offers proof of a possible causal relationship between SA, socioeconomic level, and mental health.