Hypopigmented atypical Spitzoid neoplasms (atypical Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors, Spitzoid melanoma): a clinicopathological update

"Red Spitz Tumor" on the Ear: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Spitz nevus (SN) is a benign melanocytic lesion with cytologic and architectural atypia. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish SNs from atypical Spitz tumor (AST), Spitz melanoma, or conventional melanoma. SNs frequently develop in Caucasians and appear on the skin of the head and lower extremities. Lesions on the ear in Asian populations are rare. Here, we report a “red Spitz tumor” on the ear of a Chinese 18-year-old boy. Dermoscopic examination revealed possibly malignant features presented as polymorphous vessels along with central white area, pseudo-network depigmentation and atypical peripheral globular pattern. The results of histopathological examination strongly suggested that the neoplasm was a compound SN and no recurrences or metastases occurred during 1-year follow-up post-surgery. Further, we review the literature on 4 previously reported cases of SN on the ear and summarize the main points of SN diagnosis and differential diagnosis with atypical Spitz tumors and melanoma.

NTRK Gene Fusion Detection in Atypical Spitz Tumors

Atypical Spitz tumors (AST) deviate from stereotypical Spitz nevi for one or more atypical features and are now regarded as an intermediate category of melanocytic tumors with uncertain malignant potential. Activating NTRK1/NTRK3 fusions elicit oncogenic events in Spitz lesions and are targetable with kinase inhibitors. However, their prevalence among ASTs and the optimal approach for their detection is yet to be determined. A series of 180 ASTs were screened with pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and the presence of NTRK fusions was confirmed using FISH, two different RNA-based NGS panels for solid tumors, and a specific real time RT-PCR panel. Overall, 26 ASTs showed pan-TRK immunostaining. NTRK1 fusions were detected in 15 of these cases showing cytoplasmic immunoreaction, whereas NTRK3 was detected in one case showing nuclear immunoreaction. Molecular tests resulted all positive in only two ASTs (included the NTRK3 translocated), RNA-based NGS and real time RT-PCR were both positive in three cases, and FISH and real time RT-PCR in another two cases. In seven ASTs NTRK1 fusions were detected only by FISH and in two cases only by real time RT-PCR. The frequency of NTRK fusions in ASTs is 9%, with a clear prevalence of NTRK1 compared to NTRK3 alterations. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry is an excellent screening test. Confirmation of NTRK fusions may require the use of different molecular techniques.

Mimics of melanoma in reflectance confocal microscopy

The diagnosis of melanoma is challenging for both dermatologists and oncologists. Incidence of melanoma increases at a rate of 3-7% per year. Usage of modern tools such as dermoscopy and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy improve early diagnosis and can save a life. There are a few melanoma simulators which can cause confusion and mislead in the differential diagnosis. This study aims to present skin lesions which can be similar to melanoma in confocal microscopy and to emphasize the importance of a detailed differential diagnosis. We describe five melanocytic lesions similar to melanoma and misleading confocal features. Although in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy is very useful in differentiating melanocytic lesions, histopathology evaluation in cases of melanoma mimics is definitive.

Dermoscopy of a Spark's nevus

Spark’s nevus is a particular type of melanocytic nevus that on histology shows features of both Spitz’s and Clark’s nevus. Clinically, it is an asymmetric, irregular, multicolored, pigmented lesion that is not clearly distinguishable from melanoma or dysplastic (Clark’s) nevus. Dermoscopic features have not been described yet, and one could speculate that they are similar to those of Clark’s nevi because the histopathologic architecture of Spark’s nevus is similar to that of a Clark’s nevus, resembling Spitz’s nevi in the epithelioid morphology of melanocytes. We present a 32-year-old woman with a Spark’s nevus, who upon dermoscopy showed a pronounced atypical network with accentuation of the blue veil and mostly peripheral dots.

Update on dermoscopy of Spitz/Reed naevi and management guidelines by the International Dermoscopy Society

Spitzoid lesions represent a challenging and controversial group of tumours, in terms of clinical recognition, biological behaviour and management strategies. Although Spitz naevi are considered benign tumours, their clinical and dermoscopic morphological overlap with spitzoid melanoma renders the management of spitzoid lesions particularly difficult. The controversy deepens because of the existence of tumours that cannot be safely histopathologically diagnosed as naevi or melanomas (atypical Spitz tumours). The dual objective of the present study was to provide an updated classification on dermoscopy of Spitz naevi, and management recommendations of spitzoid-looking lesions based on a consensus among experts in the field. After a detailed search of the literature for eligible studies, a data synthesis was performed from 15 studies on dermoscopy of Spitz naevi. Dermoscopically, Spitz naevi are typified by three main patterns: starburst pattern (51%), a pattern of regularly distributed dotted vessels (19%) and globular pattern with reticular depigmentation (17%). A consensus-based algorithm for the management of spitzoid lesions is proposed. According to it, dermoscopically asymmetric lesions with spitzoid features (both flat/raised and nodular) should be excised to rule out melanoma. Dermoscopically symmetric spitzoid nodules should also be excised or closely monitored, irrespective of age, to rule out atypical Spitz tumours. Dermoscopically symmetric, flat spitzoid lesions should be managed according to the age of the patient. Finally, the histopathological diagnosis of atypical Spitz tumour should warrant wide excision but not a sentinel lymph-node biopsy.

The diagnosis and management of the Spitz nevus in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Spitz nevi are uncommon melanocytic neoplasms found in children. Historically, the diagnosis and management of these tumors has lacked consensus among oncologists, pathologists, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists. Once interpreted and treated as a "juvenile melanoma", many have argued for the benignancy of such tumors in certain patient age groups, encouraging a conservative approach. The lack of consensus surrounding the diagnosis and perceived malignant potential of these tumors has led physicians to approach them on a case-by-case basis and institutional protocols. To date, no evidence-based management guideline exists. The objective of this systematic review is to both collect and appraise the evidence on the diagnosis and management of these tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2016. Our search involved collaborating with a healthcare librarian to create a strategy for the OVID/MEDLINE databases. A search of electronic databases for oncology, pathology, plastic surgery, and dermatology abstracts will be performed. Key search terms will include, among several others, "Spitz nevi," "Spitzoid melanoma," "juvenile tumor," and "pediatric". The language of publication will be restricted to English and French. Wherever data allows, meta-analyses will be used to assess differences between Spitz nevi and the tumor of comparison. Additionally, data extraction and summarization using tables will be performed. This review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016034045).

CONCLUSIONS

This review will systematically and comprehensively review diagnostic and management practices associated with the Spitz nevus. This overview of current literature will hopefully provide the foundation for future standardization of clinical practice.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016034045.

Time to reconsider Spitzoid neoplasms?

Background:

Spitzoid neoplasms may pose significant diagnostic problems because in a fraction of them it is quite difficult or impossible to establish if they are benign or malignant lesions. An extraordinarily large number of studies have been made in attempts to solve this problem; regrettably, the histological criteria proposed and the various special sophisticated techniques employed have proven to be ineffective in making this distinction with confidence.

Objectives:

To explore the possible causes for this diagnostic failure and an attempt to identify the source of this problem.

Method:

A historical and technical analysis of the specialized literature is performed, critically evaluating the main points of this controversial topic.

Results:

The reasons for the diagnostic failure in Spitzoid neoplasms are not clear but could be the result of inappropriate conceptual representation. The analysis of available data and a rational review of old and new assumptions and concepts may suggest a different representation for Spitzoid neoplasms: Spitz nevus, atypical Spitz tumor and Spitzoid melanoma, rather than being three different tumors that are difficult or impossible to distinguish with assurance, could be viewed as one unique entity, Spitz tumor (ST). This tumor is a low-grade malignant neoplasm, in which the amount of intrinsic risk is variable, ranging from very low to high (ST1, ST2, ST3), and malignant potential could be estimated.

Conclusions:

The proposed alternative representation of Spitzoid neoplasms as a unique tumor may help in overcoming the difficulty in diagnosis of these tumors.

The complex management of atypical Spitz tumours

In recent years, advances in molecular genetic characterisation have revealed that atypical Spitz tumours (ASTs) are basically heterogeneous diseases, although the clinical relevance of these findings is yet to be determined. Evidence of molecularly-defined diverse groups of lesions continues to accumulate; however, conflicting, confusing, and overlapping terminology has fostered ambiguity and lack of clarity in the field in general. The lack of fundamental diagnostic (morphological) unambiguous classification framework results in a number of challenges in the interpretation of the molecular genetic data. In this review, we discuss the main difficulties for pathologists and clinicians in the complex management of ASTs, with particular emphasis on the different genetic and biological features of recently-described entities, and offer our view of what could be medically reasonable to guide a rational approach in light of current data.