1
|
Weigle CA, Wiemann BA, Tessmer P, Störzer S, Novikova V, Richter N, Klempnauer J, Pfister ED, Baumann U, Leiskau C, Vondran FWR, Oldhafer F, Beetz O. Perioperative Complications After Pediatric Liver Transplantation-A Retrospective Analysis of 421 Cases. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14872. [PMID: 39385715 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the low incidence of pediatric liver transplantations, short- and long-term data regarding their outcome, details on early postoperative complications and their risk factors are under-represented in the literature. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1645 LTx performed at Hannover Medical School between January 2005 and December 2021. Of these, 421 transplantations were performed in 405 pediatric recipients. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors for the onset of selected perioperative complications requiring intervention within the first 30 days following transplantation and their influence on graft and patient survival. RESULTS Pleural effusions represent the most common postoperative complication observed in 49.4% (n = 208) of cases, followed by vascular complications in 22.6% (n = 95) and biliary complications in 20.0% (n = 84) of cases. Donor age (OR: 1.019; p = 0.010) and recipient age between 3 and 12 years (OR: 1.849; p = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for the onset of pleural effusions. Retransplantations within the first year after LTx were necessary in 11.4% of all cases (n = 48). Twenty (4.8%) patients died within the first year after LTx. CONCLUSION Pleural effusions requiring postoperative intervention were observed in approximately half of the pediatric recipients. Therefore, the preemptive intraoperative placement of a chest drain under sterile conditions and general anesthesia should be considered. Our data further indicate that a two-stage procedure for biliary reconstruction may be the preferred procedure in patients at risk of early bile duct complications and retransplantation within the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara A Weigle
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bengt A Wiemann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Philipp Tessmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Simon Störzer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Valeriya Novikova
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nicolas Richter
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Eva-D Pfister
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrich Baumann
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Leiskau
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Florian W R Vondran
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Felix Oldhafer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oliver Beetz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herrmann J, Petit P, Franchi-Abella S, Verhagen MV, McGuirk SP, Dammann E, Bokkers RPH, Clapuyt PRM, Deganello A, Tandoi F, de Ville de Goyet J, Hebelka H, de Lange C, Lozach C, Marra P, Mirza D, Kaliciński P, Patsch JM, Perucca G, Tsiflikas I, Renz DM, Schweiger B, Spada M, Toso S, Viremouneix L, Woodley H, Fischer L, Ording-Müller LS, Brinkert F. European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (2) intraoperative imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:269-275. [PMID: 38216682 PMCID: PMC10830587 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05840-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to monitor children during liver transplantation is available. OBJECTIVE To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra- and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses related to intraoperative imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. RESULTS Intraoperative ultrasound (US) is used by all sites to assess the quality of the vascular anastomosis in order to ensure optimal perfusion of the liver transplant. Vessel depiction is commonly achieved using color Doppler (95.3%). Additional US-based techniques are employed by fewer centers (power angio mode, 28.6%; B-flow, 19%; contrast-enhanced US, 14.3%). Most centers prefer a collaborative approach, with surgeons responsible for probe handling, while radiologists operate the US machine (47.6%). Less commonly, the intraoperative US is performed by the surgeon alone (28.6%) or by the radiologist alone (23.8%). Timing of US, imaging frequency, and documentation practices vary among centers. CONCLUSION Intraoperative US is consistently utilized across all sites during pediatric liver transplantation. However, considerable variations were observed in terms of the US setup, technique preferences, timing of controls, and documentation practices. These differences provide valuable insights for future optimization and harmonization studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Herrmann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Philippe Petit
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital de La Timone: Hopital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | - Martijn V Verhagen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Simon P McGuirk
- Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elena Dammann
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Tandoi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital: Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset Drottning Silvias Barn- Och Ungdomssjukhus, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecile Lozach
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Di Bergamo: Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, University of Milano-Bicocca, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Piotr Kaliciński
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Organ Transplantation, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janina M Patsch
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulia Perucca
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilias Tsiflikas
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diane M Renz
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hannover Medical School: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Schweiger
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Clinic of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy
| | - Seema Toso
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals: Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Viremouneix
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Helen Woodley
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lil-Sofie Ording-Müller
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital: Oslo Universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dehne S, Riede C, Klotz R, Sander A, Feisst M, Merle U, Mieth M, Golriz M, Mehrabi A, Büchler MW, Weigand MA, Larmann J. Perioperative prothrombin complex concentrate and fibrinogen administration are associated with thrombotic complications after liver transplant. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1043674. [PMID: 36523786 PMCID: PMC9745140 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1043674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of intraoperative prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and fibrinogen concentrate administration has been linked to thrombotic events. However, it is unknown if its use is associated with thrombotic events after liver transplant. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospectively conducted registry database study on patients who underwent liver transplant between 2004 and 2017 at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association between PCC and fibrinogen concentrate administration and thrombotic complications. RESULTS Data from 939 transplantations were included in the analysis. Perioperative PCC or fibrinogen administration was independently associated with the primary composite endpoint Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), Portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and inferior vena cava thrombosis [adjusted HR: 2.018 (1.174; 3.468), p = 0.011]. PCC or fibrinogen administration was associated with the secondary endpoints 30-day mortality (OR 4.225, p < 0.001), graft failure (OR 3.093, p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss, red blood cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusion, longer hospitalization, and longer length of stay in intensive care units (ICUs) (all p < 0.001). PCC or fibrinogen administration were not associated with pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, or deep vein thrombosis within 30 days after surgery. CONCLUSION A critical review of established strategies in coagulation management during liver transplantation is warranted. Perioperative caregivers should exercise caution when administering coagulation factor concentrate during liver transplant surgery. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to establish causality for the relationship between coagulation factors and thrombotic events in liver transplantation. Further studies should be tailored to identify patient subgroups that will likely benefit from PCC or fibrinogen administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Dehne
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carlo Riede
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Merle
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W. Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus A. Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Larmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Decker SO, Krüger A, Wilk H, Uhle F, Bruckner T, Hofer S, Weigand MA, Brenner T, Zivkovic AR. Concurrent Change in Serum Cholinesterase Activity and Midregional-Proadrennomedullin Level Could Predict Patient Outcome following Liver Transplantation. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12070989. [PMID: 35883545 PMCID: PMC9312899 DOI: 10.3390/biom12070989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: After liver transplantation (LTX), patients are susceptible to opportunistic infections resulting in reduced outcomes within the early post-transplantation period. The postoperative monitoring of LTX patients has gained much importance in recent years. However, reliable plasmatic markers predicting 90-day outcomes are still lacking. Methods: In the post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational study, butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), as well as conventional inflammatory markers (procalcitonin, C-reactive protein) were evaluated in 93 patients at seven consecutive timepoints within the first 28 days following LTX. Results: Persistently reduced activity of BChE and elevated MR-proADM levels indicated reduced 90-day survival following LTX. Furthermore, reduced BChE and increased MR-proADM activity could indicate early post-transplantation bacterial infections, whereas conventional inflammatory biomarkers showed no diagnostic efficacy within the observation period. Conclusion: Concurrent assessment of BChE and MR-proADM activity might serve as a bedside diagnostic tool for early bacterial infections following liver transplantation. Thus, a combined utilization of the two biomarkers may be a useful tool in the risk evaluation of patients following liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian O. Decker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
- Correspondence: (S.O.D.); (A.R.Z.); Tel.: +49-(0)62-215636380 (S.O.D.); +49-(0)62-215636843 (A.R.Z.); Fax: +49-(0)62-21565345 (S.O.D. & A.R.Z.)
| | - Albert Krüger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
| | - Henryk Wilk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
| | - Florian Uhle
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Stefan Hofer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Westpfalzklinikum, Kaiserslautern, Hellmut-Hartert-Straße 1, 67655 Kaiserslautern, Germany;
| | - Markus A. Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
| | - Thorsten Brenner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Aleksandar R. Zivkovic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (H.W.); (F.U.); (M.A.W.); (T.B.)
- Correspondence: (S.O.D.); (A.R.Z.); Tel.: +49-(0)62-215636380 (S.O.D.); +49-(0)62-215636843 (A.R.Z.); Fax: +49-(0)62-21565345 (S.O.D. & A.R.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim JS, Kim DW, Kim KW, Song GW, Lee SG. Improving the Specificity of CT Angiography for the Diagnosis of Hepatic Artery Occlusion after Liver Transplantation in Suspected Patients with Doppler Ultrasound Abnormalities. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:52-59. [PMID: 34983093 PMCID: PMC8743154 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the diagnostic performance of CT angiography (CTA) could be improved by modifying the conventional criterion (anastomosis site abnormality) to diagnose hepatic artery occlusion (HAO) after liver transplantation (LT) in suspected patients with Doppler ultrasound (US) abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred thirty-four adult LT recipients (88 males and 46 females; mean age, 52.7 years) with suspected HAO on Doppler US (40 HAO and 94 non-HAO according to the reference standards) were included. We evaluated 1) abnormalities in the HA anastomosis, categorized as a cutoff, ≥ 50% stenosis at the anastomotic site, or diffuse stenosis at both graft and recipient sides around the anastomosis, and 2) abnormalities in the distal run-off, including invisibility or irregular, faint, and discontinuous enhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the conventional (considering anastomosis site abnormalities alone) and modified CTA criteria (abnormalities in both the anastomosis site and distal run-off) for the diagnosis of HAO were calculated and compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS By using the conventional criterion to diagnose HAO, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 100% (40/40), 74.5% (70/94), 62.5% (40/64), 100% (70/70), and 82.1% (110/134), respectively. The modified criterion for diagnosing HAO showed significantly increased specificity (93.6%, 88/94) and accuracy (93.3%, 125/134) compared to that with the conventional criterion (p = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively), although the sensitivity (92.5%, 37/40) decreased slightly without statistical significance (p = 0.250). CONCLUSION The modified criterion considering abnormalities in both the anastomosis site and distal run-off improved the diagnostic performance of CTA for HAO in suspected patients with Doppler US abnormalities, particularly by increasing the specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology and Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Gi Won Song
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gyu Lee
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kumaran V, Kapoor S, Sable S, Nath B, Varma V. The "W" Technique: A Safe and Reproducible Technique for Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Ann Transplant 2021; 26:e926979. [PMID: 33510125 PMCID: PMC7852041 DOI: 10.12659/aot.926979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reconstruction of the hepatic arterial inflow can be technically demanding in living donor liver transplantation, and thrombosis can result in graft loss and mortality. We describe the safe and reproducible "W" technique to reconstruct the hepatic artery and outcomes before and after adoption of the technique in a consecutive series of liver transplants at 2 high-volume living donor liver transplant centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospectively collected data were analyzed to compare the outcomes before and after introduction of a standardized "W" technique for reconstruction of the hepatic artery in 2 high-volume living donor liver transplant programs. RESULTS In a consecutive series of 675 liver transplants, of which 27 were deceased donor transplants and 648 were living donor transplants, 443 transplants were performed with a standard interrupted reconstruction of the hepatic artery under loupes. These transplants were performed by a single surgeon, with an incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis of 2%. After introduction of the "W" technique, despite the arterial reconstruction being done by several surgeons in the early part of their learning curve, the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis decreased to 0.86% in the next 232 transplants. CONCLUSIONS The "W" technique is a simple, easy to learn and teach technique for reconstruction of the hepatic artery without the use of the operating microscope in living donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Kumaran
- Department of Surgery (Transplant), Hume Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, U.S.A
| | - Sorabh Kapoor
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplant, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Shailesh Sable
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sahyadri Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Barun Nath
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - Vibha Varma
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Max Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Calinescu AM, Wildhaber BE. Early Vascular Complications. PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2021:181-191. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-63671-1.00020-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
8
|
Daglilar E, Connolly SE, Tahan V, Cohen A, Therapondos G. The Utilization and Diagnostic Yield of Upper Endoscopy for Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Within the First Year After Liver Transplantation. Cureus 2020; 12:e11323. [PMID: 33282596 PMCID: PMC7717078 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms impact quality of life and increase health care utilization after liver transplantation (LTx). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used to investigate these symptoms. Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic yield and utilization of EGD after LTx for common GI symptoms. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large liver transplant center and included all adults who underwent EGD within the first year after receiving LTx between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Biliary procedures were excluded. Results Of 437 patients who underwent LTx during the study period, 64 (15%) underwent EGD for the evaluation of GI symptoms within the first year of transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 57 (13%) cases were analyzed. GI hemorrhage (hematemesis/melena) was the most common reason (4%; n=18) for evaluation with EGD followed by nausea/anorexia (3%; n=12). Symptoms were investigated with EGD, including epigastric/abdominal pain (2%; n=9), dysphagia/odynophagia (2%; n=8), anemia (1%; n=5), diarrhea (1%; n=4), and heartburn (0.2%; n=1). The diagnostic yield of EGD was highest with GI hemorrhage (83%) followed by dysphagia/odynophagia (75%). EGD diagnostic yield was lower for the other symptoms, ranging from 0% to 25%. Conclusions EGD was commonly utilized within the first year of LTx, with the highest diagnostic yields for GI hemorrhage and dysphagia/odynophagia. Because of the low diagnostic yield of EGD for other symptoms, we recommend a careful selection of patients for EGD following LTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebubekir Daglilar
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA
| | - Sean E Connolly
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, USA
| | - Veysel Tahan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA
| | - Ari Cohen
- Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Impact of Microsurgical Anastomosis of Hepatic Artery on Arterial Complications and Survival Outcomes After Liver Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:65-72. [PMID: 32951861 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Hepatic artery (HA) complications after liver transplant (LT) can lead to biliary complications, graft failure, and mortality. Although microsurgery has been established to improve anastomotic outcomes, it prolongs surgical time and has not reached widespread adoption at all transplant centers. We investigated the incidences of arterial, biliary complications and outcomes after using microsurgery to anastomose HA during LT. Retrospective cohort of consecutive LT performed from 2006 to 2018 was reviewed for operative details and postoperative outcomes. Cox-regression models were used to investigate the relationship between variables and outcomes. Eighty (62.5%) LTs (Group 1) were performed without and compared with 48 (Group 2) with microsurgical anastomosis of HA. Both groups were comparable in terms of arterial and biliary anastomoses performed. Incidence of early HA thrombosis was similar (6.2% vs 2.1%, P = .28). Group 2 had lower incidence of short- and long-term arterial complications, especially amongst living donor liver transplantations (LDLT) (5.3% vs 35.0%, P = .022). On multivariate analysis, microsurgery was associated with lower risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.71) of, and LDLT had higher risk (HR 4.23, 95% CI 1.46-12.27) of arterial complications. Biliary complications were associated with LDLT (HR 3.91, 95% CI 1.30-11.71) and dual biliary anastomoses (HR 5.26, 95% CI 1.15-24.08) but not with occurrence of HA complications. Worse patient survival was associated with the occurrence of any HA complication (HR 4.11, 95% CI 1.78-9.48). Hepatic arterial complications can be reduced using microsurgical techniques for the anastomosis, resulting in improved patient survival outcomes after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Castanedo S, Toledo E, Fernández-Santiago R, Castillo F, Echeverri J, Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC. Influence of postoperative complications on long-term survival in liver transplant patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12:336-345. [PMID: 32903918 PMCID: PMC7448209 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i8.336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplant (LT) is a complex procedure with frequent postoperative complications. In other surgical procedures such as gastrectomy, esophagectomy or resection of liver metastases, these complications are associated with poorer long-term survival. It is possible this happens in LT but there are not enough data to establish this relationship.
AIM To analyze the possible influence of postoperative complications on long-term survival and the ability of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to predict this.
METHODS Retrospective study in a tertiary-level university hospital. The 164 participants were all patients who received a LT from January 2012 to July 2019. The follow-up was done in the hospital until the end of the study or death. Comorbidity and risk after transplantation were calculated using the Charlson and balance of risk (BAR) scores, respectively. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the CCI. To assess the CCI cut-off value with greater prognostic accuracy a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was built, with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC). Overall survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier test and log-rank test. Groups were compared by the Mann-Whitney test. For the multivariable analysis the Cox regression was used.
RESULTS The mean follow-up time of the cohort was 37.76 (SD = 24.5) mo. A ROC curve of CCI with 5-year survival was built. The AUC was 0.826 (0.730-0.922), P < 0.001. The cut-off was calculated by means of the Youden index with a result of 35.95. The sensitivity was 84.6% and the specificity 61.3%. Survival curves for comparison of patients with CCI score < 36 vs ≥ 36 were calculated. The estimated 5-year survival was 57.65 and 43.95 months, respectively (log-rank < 0.001). This suggests that patients with more severe complications exhibit worse long-term survival. Other cut-off values were analysed. Comparison between patients with CCI < 33.5 vs > 33.5 (33.5 = median CCI value) showed estimated 5-year survival was 57.4 and 45.71 months, respectively (log-rank < 0.0001). Dividing patients according to the mode CCI value (20.9) showed an estimated 5-year survival of 60 mo for a CCI below 20.9 vs 57 mo for a CCI above 20.9 (log-rank = 0.147). The univariate analysis did not show any association between individual complications and long-term survival. A multivariate analysis was carried out to analyse the possible influence of CCI, Charlson comorbidity index, BAR and hepatocellular carcinoma on survival. Only the CCI score showed significant influence on long-term survival.
CONCLUSION A complicated postoperative period – well-defined by means of the CCI score – can influence not only short-term survival, but also long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Castanedo
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander 39008, Spain
| | - Enrique Toledo
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander 39008, Spain
| | - Roberto Fernández-Santiago
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander 39008, Spain
| | - Federico Castillo
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander 39008, Spain
| | - Juan Echeverri
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander 39008, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Sanjuán
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander 39008, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oba A, Bao QR, Barnett CC, Al-Musawi MH, Croce C, Schulick RD, Del Chiaro M. Vascular Resections for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Vascular Resections for PDAC. Scand J Surg 2020; 109:18-28. [PMID: 31960765 DOI: 10.1177/1457496919900413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS It has become clear that vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the standard of care as supported by multiple guidelines. However, resection of large peri-pancreatic arteries remains debatable. MATERIALS AND METHODS This review examines the current state of vascular resection with curative intent for PDAC in the last 5 years. Herein, we consider venous (superior mesenteric vein, portal vein), as well as arterial (superior mesenteric artery, celiac trunk, hepatic artery) resection or both with or without reconstruction. RESULTS Improvement of multidrug chemotherapy has revolutionized care for PDAC that should shift traditional surgical thinking from an anatomical classification of resectability to a prognostic and biological classification. CONCLUSION The present review gives an overview on the results of pancreatectomy associated with vascular resection, with consideration of new perspectives offered by the availability of better systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Oba
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Q R Bao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - C C Barnett
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - M H Al-Musawi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA
| | - C Croce
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA
| | - R D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - M Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|