1
|
Rodriguez Peñaranda N, de Angelis M, Siech C, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Di Bari S, Puliatti S, Micali S, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative Complications and In-hospital Mortality After Cystectomy for Nonbladder Cancer Conditions Versus Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2025:10.1245/s10434-025-17456-w. [PMID: 40402424 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17456-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 04/23/2025] [Indexed: 05/23/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was designed to test for perioperative complications, mortality, and length of stay after cystectomy for nonbladder cancer (non-BCa) v radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). METHODS Patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019). Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were fitted. RESULTS Of 26,721 cystectomy patients, 1314 (5%) harbored non-BCa diagnosis: 515 (39%) neurogenic bladder; 379 (29%) radiation cystitis; 238 (18%) interstitial cystitis; 181 (14%) bladder fistula. Relative to RC for BCa, cystectomy for neurogenic bladder, radiation cystitis and bladder fistula resulted in higher genitourinary (22-39 vs. 14%; multivariable odds ratios [MOR] 1.7-3.8), infectious (7-8 vs. 4%; MOR 1.5-2.3), and wound (9 vs. 5%; MOR 1.5-2.0) complications rates. Only cystectomy for neurogenic bladder resulted in higher pulmonary complications (15 vs. 11%; MOR 1.8). Additionally, cystectomy for neurogenic bladder and bladder fistula independently predicted 1.5-fold higher rate of critical care therapy (CCT) use, but only cystectomy for neurogenic bladder exhibited 2.4-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate. Finally, cystectomy for neurogenic bladder, radiation cystitis, and bladder fistula resulted in higher rates of hospital stay ≥ 75th percentile (33-47 vs. 27%; MOR 1.7-2.8). CONCLUSIONS Relative to RC for BCa, cystectomy for three of four non-BCa conditions resulted in higher rates of four of 12 in-hospital adverse outcomes. Additionally, cystectomy for two of four non-BCa conditions resulted in higher CCT use, but only cystectomy for neurogenic bladder predicted higher rate of in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Di Bari
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Bello F, Rodriguez Penaranda N, Marmiroli A, Longoni M, Falkenbach F, Le QC, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Puliatti S, De Cobelli O, Briganti A, Graefen M, Chun FHK, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes at Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2025:10.1245/s10434-025-17398-3. [PMID: 40314906 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 04/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this work is to quantify the magnitude of improvement in in-hospital outcomes between historical and contemporary robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus historical and contemporary open PN (OPN). METHODS Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2019), we identified patients who underwent RPN and OPN. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit. RESULTS Historical (2010-2014) versus contemporary (2015-2019) proportions were 39% (n = 5,897) versus 61% (n = 9168) for RPN and 59% (n = 7289) versus 41% (n = 5,120) for OPN. Relative to historical, contemporary RPN patients exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 6 of 12 categories that ranged from-76% for intraoperative complications to-24% for length of stay (LOS) ≥ 75th percentile. Relative to historical, contemporary OPN patients also exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 7 of 12 categories that ranged from-76% for intraoperative complications to-23% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile. When historical RPN was compared with historical OPN, RPN in-hospital outcomes were better in 10 of 12 comparisons that ranged from-75% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile to-28% for perioperative bleeding. Similarly, when contemporary RPN was compared with contemporary OPN, RPN outcomes were better in 8 of 12 comparisons that ranged from-75% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile to-27% for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION The magnitude of improvement in in-hospital outcomes was more pronounced for contemporary versus historical OPN (seven improved categories) than for contemporary versus historical RPN (six improved categories). However, contemporary RPN outperformed contemporary OPN patients in eight in-hospital outcome categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Natali Rodriguez Penaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix H K Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Bello F, Siech C, de Angelis M, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Puliatti S, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Critical care therapy and in-hospital mortality after radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2025; 43:328.e9-328.e15. [PMID: 39395866 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of critical care therapies (CCT), that include invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and other modalities are unknown after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Their relationship with in-hospital mortality is also unknown. METHODS Within the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2019), we identified non-metastatic UUTC patients treated with RNU. Multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS Of 8,995 patients, 375 (4.2%) received CCT and 82 (0.9%) experienced in-hospital mortality. Of CCT modalities, 215 (2.4%) received IMV and 139 (1.5%) TPN. Temporal CCT, IMV, and TPN trends very closely followed in-hospital mortality trends. Relative to historical UUTC patients (2008-2013), contemporary (2014-2019) patients exhibited lower CCT (Δ = 2.2%, P value < 0.0001), lower IMV (Δ = 1.4%, P < 0.0001), lower TPN (Δ = 2.2%, P < 0.0001), and lower in-hospital mortality (Δ = 0.4%, P = 0.03) rates. Of in-hospital mortalities, 52 out of 82 received CCT but 30 of 82 did not. Median age (> 72 years; odds ratio [OR] 1.4; P = 0.002) and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (OR 4.1; P < 0.001) and ≥ 1-2 (OR 1.7; P = 0.001) independently predicted overall higher CCT, IMV, TPN, and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION After RNU, CCT rates parallels in-hospital mortality rates. CCT represents a 5 to 6-fold multiple of in-hospital mortality rate. In RNU patients, CCT rates are higher in older and sicker individuals. Lower CCT rates that are paralleled by lower in-hospital mortality may be interpreted as an indicator of improved quality of care. Ideally all in-hospital mortalities should be predated by CCT exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Falkenbach F, Peñaranda NR, Longoni M, Marmiroli A, Le QC, Catanzaro C, Nicolazzini M, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Puliatti S, Schiavina R, Palumbo C, Musi G, Chun FKH, Briganti A, Saad F, Shariat SF, Budäus L, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI. The Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease on Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2025. [PMID: 40084789 DOI: 10.1111/iju.70038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radical prostatectomy (RP) may be a treatment option for prostate cancer in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the effect of CKD on adverse in-hospital outcomes after RP is not well known. METHODS Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were used to address National Inpatient Sample RP patients between 2005 and 2019. CKD severity was stratified as mild (stage I/II) versus moderate (stage III) versus severe (stage IV/V). RESULTS Of 191 050 RP patients, 4349 (2.3%) had CKD. Of those, 2301 (52.9%), 1416 (32.6%), and 632 (14.5%) were classified as mild, moderate, or severe CKD, respectively. The CKD rate increased from 0.3% to 5.6% (2005-2019, EAPC: + 15.3%, p < 0.001). CKD patients invariably exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes, except for in-hospital mortality. The absolute differences were largest for overall complications (+ 12.5%), length of stay > 2 days (+ 11.8%), and blood transfusions (+ 3.7%, all p < 0.001). CKD was an independent predictor in all comparisons except for in-hospital mortality (p < 0.05). The detrimental effect was most pronounced for dialysis for acute kidney failure (multivariable odds ratio [OR] 10.49), genitourinary complications (OR: 2.47), and critical care therapies (OR: 2.45, all p < 0.001). Finally, a dose-response relationship of CKD severity (mild vs. moderate vs. severe) and its effect on adverse in-hospital outcomes was observed in seven of 14 comparisons. CONCLUSIONS CKD patients invariably exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes after RP. The presence of CKD should be carefully considered when RP represents a management option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Calogero Catanzaro
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Nicolazzini
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nicolazzini M, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Falkenbach F, Longoni M, Marmiroli A, Le QC, Catanzaro C, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Micali S, Graefen M, Briganti A, Musi G, Chun FKH, Schiavina R, Saad F, Shariat SF, Palumbo C, Volpe A, Karakiewicz PI. The effect of chronic kidney disease on adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. World J Urol 2025; 43:149. [PMID: 40044881 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05496-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2025] [Indexed: 05/13/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is frequent in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit. However, the effect of CKD on adverse in-hospital outcomes after ileal conduit RC is not well known. METHODS Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were used to address National Inpatient Sample patients treated with ileal conduit RC between 2006 and 2019. CKD severity was stratified as mild (stage II) vs. moderate (stage III) vs. severe (stage IV/V). RESULTS Of 13,359 patients treated with RC with ileal conduit, 1973 (14.8%) had CKD. Of those, 956 (48.5%), 802 (40.6%), and 215 (10.9%) were classified as mild, moderate, or severe CKD, respectively. CKD rate increased from 4.1 to 21.9% (2006-2019, EAPC: +8.9%, p < 0.001). CKD RC patients exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes in 11 of 15 categories. The absolute differences were largest for overall complications (+ 13.2%), prolonged length of stay (+ 7.0%), blood transfusions (+ 6.0%, all p < 0.001). After detailed multivariable adjustment, CKD was an independent predictor of 11 of 15 adverse in-hospital outcomes' categories. The detrimental effect of CKD was most pronounced for dialysis (OR 7.09), overall complications (OR 1.84), and neurological complications (OR 1.61, all p < 0.001). Finally, a dose-response effect according to CKD severity on adverse in-hospital outcomes was observed in eight of 15 categories. CONCLUSIONS CKD RC patients invariably exhibited higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes after RC with ileal conduit. In consequence this patient group should receive particularly strong consideration for preoperative optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Nicolazzini
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- 6. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Calogero Catanzaro
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- 6. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peñaranda NR, Di Bello F, Falkenbach F, Marmiroli A, Longoni M, Le QC, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Graefen M, De Cobelli O, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Di Bari S, Stella G, Puliatti S, Micali S, Karakiewicz PI. Effect of Race/Ethnicity on In-hospital Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2025:10.1007/s40615-025-02343-7. [PMID: 40035954 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-025-02343-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 11/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/06/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previously, African American race/ethnicity predisposed to higher rate of adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical cystectomy (RC). We tested whether this association applies to contemporary RC patients. METHODS Patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS 2000-2019). Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were fitted. RESULTS Of 19,370 RC patients, 1,089 (5.6%) were African American, while 18,281 (94.4%) were Caucasian. Relative to Caucasians, African Americans were younger (median age 66 vs. 70 years; p < 0.001), more frequently female (33.8 vs. 18.5%; p < 0.001) and more frequently in the lowest income quartile (46.8 vs. 18.6%; p < 0.001). Relative to Caucasians, after RC, African Americans exhibited higher rates of postoperative complications (61.3 vs. 58.3%; multivariable odds ratio [MOR] 1.2; p = 0.009). Specifically, African Americans exhibited higher rates of blood transfusions (30.2 vs. 24.1%; MOR 1.3; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal (26.7 vs. 24.1%; MOR 1.2; p = 0.003), and infectious (6.2 vs. 4.2%; MOR 1.5; p = 0.001) complications, as well as deep vein thrombosis (3.1 vs. 1.7%; MOR 1.9; p < 0.001). Additionally, after RC, African Americans exhibited higher rates of critical care therapy use (CCT; 13.9 vs. 12.2%; MOR 1.3; p = 0.002) and in-hospital mortality (2.8 vs. 1.7%; MOR 1.8; p = 0.002). Finally, African Americans exhibited higher rates of length of stay ≥ 75th percentile (40.9 vs. 31.2%; MOR 1.6; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In contemporary RC patients, African American race/ethnicity predisposes to less favorable in-hospital outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality and longer hospital stay. Unfortunately, these race/ethnicity disadvantages have not been improved upon relative to the previous report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- Department of Urology, AOU Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini, 135541126, Baggiovara, Italy.
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Stefano Di Bari
- Department of Urology, AOU Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini, 135541126, Baggiovara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Stella
- Department of Urology, AOU Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini, 135541126, Baggiovara, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini, 135541126, Baggiovara, Italy
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, AOU Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Giardini, 135541126, Baggiovara, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gill E, Choi YS, Kim S, Chung W. Effects of Inpatient Hospice Care on Cost and Medication Use in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Study in South Korea. J Palliat Med 2025; 28:335-344. [PMID: 39628392 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Inpatient hospices (IHs) can alleviate distress and address economic burdens on patients with terminal cancer. However, there have been inconsistent findings regarding IHs in terms of cost savings and medication use. Objective: We aimed to examine cost savings associated with IHs, according to the timing of first hospitalization before death, and analyze their use of medication, among Korean patients with terminal lung cancer. Methods: Using the South Korean national health insurance claim database, we identified 31,139 patients with lung cancer who died between 2017 and 2020. Their daily hospitalization costs were analyzed using a generalized linear model stratified by time of first hospitalization before death. Medication use was examined using a negative binomial model. Results: IHs spent $134, and $21 less on patients during days 1-7, and 8-30 before death, but $18, $44, $36, and $54 more during days 31-60, 61-90, and 91-180, respectively, compared with non-IHs (all p < 0.05). However, total hospitalization costs in the year preceding death did not differ (relative risk: 0.990, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.972-1.007, p > 0.05). IHs used 2.103 times more opioid analgesics (95% CI: 1.980-2.233, p < 0.001). They also used more antiemetics, delirium medications, and antianxiety agents, as well as fewer antidepressive agents, systemic steroids, diuretics, total parenteral nutrition, and antibiotics (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with terminal lung cancer in IHs in Korea were more likely to receive symptom-oriented medications and experienced reduced hospitalization costs only during the 30 days preceding death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunsun Gill
- Department of Family Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Epidemiology, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Youn Seon Choi
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sejung Kim
- Department of Internal Hospital Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wankyo Chung
- Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Siech C, de Angelis M, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Puliatti S, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative Complications and In-Hospital Mortality in Radical Nephroureterectomy Patients with Heart Valve Replacement. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:2226-2232. [PMID: 39627641 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16639-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative complication rates and in-hospital mortality after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with a history of heart valve replacement are unknown. METHODS Within the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019), we identified non-metastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma patients treated with RNU according to the presence or absence of a history of heart valve replacement. Propensity score matching (1:10 ratio) and multivariable logistic regression as well as Poisson regression models were used. RESULTS Of 15,423 RNU patients, 151 (1.0%) harbored heart valve replacement. This proportion increased over the study span from 0.5% to 1.4% (p = 0.02). Heart valve replacement patients were older (median 78 vs. 72 years; p < 0.001), more frequently male (73 vs. 60%; p = 0.002), and more frequently harbored a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3 (36 vs. 27%; p = 0.002). After 1:10 propensity score matching for age, sex, and CCI, the patients exhibited higher rates of perioperative bleeding (7.4 vs. 2.4%; odds ratio [OR] 3.2; p < 0.001), blood transfusions (24.0 vs. 17.0%; OR 1.6; p = 0.02), and cardiac complications (24.0 vs. 14.0%; OR 2.1; p < 0.001). Conversely, heart valve replacement patients did not exhibit higher rates of critical care therapy (OR 1.06; p = 0.8), higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.8; p = 0.8), and longer length of stay (OR 1.4; p = 0.052) than their RNU counterparts without a history of heart valve replacement. CONCLUSION RNU patients with a history of heart valve replacement are at significantly increased risk of perioperative bleeding, blood transfusions, and cardiac complications; however, despite these increased risks, they neither exhibited higher critical care therapy rates or higher in-hospital mortality rates, nor did they require significantly longer hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodriguez Peñaranda N, di Bello F, Marmiroli A, Falkenbach F, Longoni M, Le QC, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Graefen M, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Stella G, Piro A, Puliatti S, Micali S, Karakiewicz PI. Urinary Diversion Versus Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:2233-2240. [PMID: 39656392 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16644-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare adverse in-hospital outcomes in ileal conduit versus neobladder urinary diversion type after radical cystectomy (RC) in contemporary versus historical patients. METHODS Patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS 2000-2019). Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:2 ratio) and multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were used. RESULTS Of 10,533 contemporary (2011-2019) patients, 943 (9.0%) underwent neobladder urinary diversion, while 9590 (91.0%) underwent ileal conduit urinary diversion. Furthermore, of 9742 historical (2010-2019) patients, 932 (9.6%) underwent neobladder urinary diversion and 8810 (90.4%) underwent ileal conduit urinary diversion. After 1:2 PSM, within the contemporary cohort, 943/943 (100%) neobladder versus 1886/9590 (19.6%) ileal conduit patients were included. Similarly, within the historical cohort, 932/932 (100%) neobladder versus 1864/8810 (21.1%) ileal conduit patients were included after PSM. In multivariable LRMs, relative to contemporary neobladder patients, contemporary ileal conduit patients exhibited higher rates of overall postoperative (49.0 vs. 43.6%; multivariable odds ratio [MOR] 1.2), wound (4.2 vs. 2.7%; MOR 1.6), and genitourinary (13.1% vs. 10.0%; MOR 1.3) complications as well as blood transfusions (19.0 vs. 15.6%; MOR 1.3). Conversely, in multivariable LRMs within the historical cohort, no differences were recorded between ileal conduit and neobladder patients. CONCLUSIONS Unlike historical comparisons between ileal conduit and neobladder patients, where no differences in adverse in-hospital outcomes were recorded, analyses relying on a contemporary patient cohort subject to PSM and multivariable adjustment revealed higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes in 4/13 examined categories. This observation should be considered at informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Francesco di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Stella
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Adele Piro
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lu S, Rakovitch E, Hannon B, Zimmermann C, Dharmarajan KV, Yan M, De Almeida JR, Yao CMKL, Gillespie EF, Chino F, Yerramilli D, Goonaratne E, Abdel-Rahman F, Othman H, Mheid S, Tsai CJ. Palliative Care as a Component of High-Value and Cost-Saving Care During Hospitalization for Metastatic Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2025; 21:252-260. [PMID: 38442311 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that palliative care (PC) can improve quality of life and survival for outpatients with advanced cancer, but there are limited population-based data on the value of inpatient PC. We assessed PC as a component of high-value care among a nationally representative sample of inpatients with metastatic cancer and identified hospitalization characteristics significantly associated with high costs. METHODS Hospitalizations of patients 18 years and older with a primary diagnosis of metastatic cancer from the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess medical services, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics associated with higher charges billed to insurance and hospital costs. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine cost savings associated with provision of PC. RESULTS Among 397,691 hospitalizations from 2010 to 2019, the median charge per admission increased by 24.9%, from $44,904 in US dollars (USD) to $56,098 USD, whereas the median hospital cost remained stable at $14,300 USD. Receipt of inpatient PC was associated with significantly lower charges (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.64]; P < .001) and costs (OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.61]; P < .001). Factors associated with high charges were receipt of invasive medical ventilation (P < .001) or systemic therapy (P < .001), Hispanic patients (P < .001), young age (18-49 years, P < .001), and for-profit hospitals (P < .001). PC provision was associated with a $1,310 USD (-13.6%, P < .001) reduction in costs per hospitalization compared with no PC, independent of the receipt of invasive care and age. CONCLUSION Inpatient PC is associated with reduced hospital costs for patients with metastatic cancer, irrespective of age and receipt of aggressive interventions. Integration of inpatient PC may de-escalate costs incurred through low-value inpatient interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sifan Lu
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Eileen Rakovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kavita V Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Michael Yan
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R De Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher M K L Yao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Divya Yerramilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Fadwa Abdel-Rahman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hiba Othman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Mheid
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siech C, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Touma N, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Ahyai S, Briganti A, Cano Garcia C, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Trends and Disparities in Inpatient Palliative Care Use in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Critical Care Therapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102269. [PMID: 39662151 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2024] [Revised: 11/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Temporal trends in and predictors of inpatient palliative care use in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) undergoing critical care therapy are unknown. METHODS Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2019), we identified mRCC patients undergoing critical care therapy, namely invasive mechanical ventilation, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion, dialysis for acute kidney failure, total parenteral nutrition, or tracheostomy. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) analyses and multivariable logistic regression models addressed inpatient palliative care use. RESULTS Of 3802 mRCC patients undergoing critical care therapy, 817 (21.5%) received inpatient palliative care. Overall, inpatient palliative care use increased from 4.9% to 31.5% between 2008 and 2019 (EAPC +9.2%). In subgroup analyses, the highest increase in inpatient palliative care use was observed in the Midwest (EAPC: +11.9%), in the South (EAPC +10.4%), and in teaching hospitals (EAPC +9.0%; all P ≤ .004). In logistic regression models, teaching hospital status (odds ratio [OR] 1.41) and contemporary year interval (OR 2.12; all P < .001) independently predicted higher inpatient palliative care rates. Conversely, hospital admission in the Northeast (OR 0.53) or in the South (OR 0.79; all P ≤ .03) was associated with lower inpatient palliative care rates than in the West. CONCLUSION In mRCC patients, inpatient palliative care rates have improved over time, with the highest increase in hospitals in the Midwest and in the South. Moreover, admission to teaching hospitals or in the West is associated with higher inpatient palliative care rates. In consequence, regional disparities, as well as differences according to teaching hospital status represent targets to achieve comprehensive inpatient palliative care coverage in mRCC patients receiving critical care therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nawar Touma
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Marmiroli A, Longoni M, Falkenbach F, Le QC, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Puliatti S, De Cobelli O, Briganti A, Graefen M, Chun FHK, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. In-Hospital Outcomes after Robotic Vs Open Radical Nephroureterectomy. J Endourol 2025; 39:127-134. [PMID: 39829349 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective: To test whether the contemporary robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RNU) is associated with more favorable in-hospital outcomes than historical RNU, relative to the same endpoints in open NU (ONU). Methods: Within the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2019), we identified RNU and ONU patients. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were fitted. Results: Of 8032 NU patients, historical (2008-2013) vs contemporary (2014-2019) proportions were 776 (41%) vs 1104 (59%) for RNU and 3719 (60%) vs 2433 (40%) for ONU. The rates of RNU have increased over time (2008-2019; Δ absolute: +18%; p < 0.001). Contemporary RNU patients exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 6 of 12 comparisons vs historical that ranged from -54% for genitourinary complications to -12% for median length of stay (LOS). Contemporary ONU patients also exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 11 of 12 comparisons vs historical that ranged from -67% for blood transfusions to -26% for gastrointestinal complications. When historical RNU was compared with historical ONU, RNU in-hospital outcomes were better in 7 of 12 comparisons that ranged from -61% for median LOS to -16% for postoperative complications. Conversely, when contemporary RNU was compared with contemporary ONU, RNU in-hospital outcomes were only better in 2 of 12 comparisons: -25% cardiac complications and -13% for median LOS. Conclusion: The magnitude of in-hospital outcomes categories improvement between historical vs contemporary was two-fold more pronounced in ONU (11 improved categories) than in RNU (6 improved categories). Few outcome benefits remained (two categories only) when contemporary RNU was compared with contemporary ONU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix H K Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cano Garcia C, Incesu RB, Barletta F, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Tappero S, Piccinelli ML, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Terrone C, De Cobelli O, Carmignani L, Ahyai S, Longo N, Tilki D, Briganti A, Banek S, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Use of inpatient palliative care in metastatic testicular cancer patients undergoing critical care therapy: insights from the national inpatient sample. Sci Rep 2025; 15:967. [PMID: 39762392 PMCID: PMC11704327 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83545-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
To test for rates of inpatient palliative care (IPC) in metastatic testicular cancer patients receiving critical care therapy (CCT). Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2008-2019), we tabulated IPC rates in metastatic testicular cancer patients receiving CCT, namely invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG), dialysis for acute kidney failure (AKF), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or tracheostomy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models addressing IPC were fitted. Of 420 metastatic testicular cancer patients undergoing CCT, 70 (17%) received IPC. Between 2008 and 2019, the rates of IPC among metastatic testicular cancer patients undergoing CCT increased from 5 to 19%, with the highest rate of 30% in 2018 (EAPC: + 9.5%; 95% CI + 4.7 to + 15.2%; p = 0.005). IPC patients were older (35 vs. 31 years, p = 0.01), more frequently had do not resuscitate (DNR) status (34 vs. 4%, p < 0.001), more frequently exhibited brain metastases (29 vs. 17%, p = 0.03), were more frequently treated with IMV (76 vs. 53%, p < 0.001) and exhibited higher rate of inpatient mortality (74 vs. 29%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, DNR status (OR 10.23, p < 0.001) and African American race/ethnicity (OR 4.69, p = 0.003) were identified as independent predictors of higher IPC use. We observed a significant increase in rates of IPC use in metastatic testicular cancer patients receiving CCT, rising from 5 to 19% between 2008 and 2019. However, this rates remain lower compared to metastatic lung cancer patients, indicating the need for further awareness among clinicians treating metastatic testicular cancer. The increase in IPC rates for metastatic testicular cancer patients receiving CCT indicates a need for ongoing education and awareness among healthcare providers. This could enhance the integration of IPC in the treatment of advanced cancer, potentially improving quality of life and care outcomes for survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nicola Longo
- Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Severine Banek
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Siech C, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Puliatti S, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Hoeh B, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Critical Care Therapy After Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Kidney Cancer. Crit Care Med 2025; 53:e132-e139. [PMID: 39774205 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine critical care therapy rates after cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic kidney cancer patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019), we addressed critical care therapy use (total parenteral nutrition, invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion, and tracheostomy) and in-hospital mortality in surgically treated metastatic kidney cancer patients. Estimated annual percentage changes and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 10,915 patients, 802 (7.3%) received critical care therapy and 249 (2.4%) died in-hospital. Over time, critical care therapy rates did not differ significantly (6.6% in 2000 to 5.7% in 2019; p = 0.07), while in-hospital mortality decreased from 2.3% to 1.9% (p = 0.004). Age 71 years old or older (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; p < 0.001) and higher comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] ≥ 3: OR, 2.92; p < 0.001 and CCI 1-2: OR, 1.45; p < 0.001) independently predicted higher critical care therapy rates. Conversely, partial nephrectomy (OR, 0.51; p = 0.003) and minimally invasive surgery (OR, 0.33; p < 0.001) predicted lower critical care therapy rates. Virtually the same associations were recorded for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS After cytoreductive nephrectomy, critical care therapy rate was 7.3% vs. in-hospital mortality was 2.4%. Of patients at highest risk of critical care therapy need were those with CCI greater than or equal to 3 and those 71 years old or older. Ideally, these patients should represent targets for thorough assessment of risk factors for complications before cytoreductive nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Di Bello F, Siech C, de Angelis M, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Micali S, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative Complications and In-Hospital Mortality in Paraplegic Radical Cystectomy Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:583-588. [PMID: 39377845 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16332-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to test for the association between paraplegia and perioperative complications as well as in-hospital mortality after radical cystectomy (RC) for non-metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS Perioperative complications and in-hospital mortality were tabulated in RC patients with or without paraplegia in the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019). RESULTS Of 25,527 RC patients, 185 (0.7%) were paraplegic. Paraplegic RC patients were younger (≤70 years of age; 75 vs. 53%), more frequently female (28 vs. 19%), and more frequently harbored Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3 (56 vs. 18%). Of paraplegic vs. non-paraplegic RC patients, 141 versus 15,112 (76 vs. 60%) experienced overall complications, 38 versus 2794 (21 vs. 11%) pulmonary complications, 36 versus 3525 (19 vs. 14%) genitourinary complications, 33 versus 3087 (18 vs. 12%) intraoperative complications, 21 versus 1035 (11 vs. 4%) infections, and 17 versus 1343 (9 vs. 5%) wound complications, while 62 versus 6267 (34 vs. 25%) received blood transfusions, 47 versus 3044 (25 vs. 12%) received critical care therapy (CCT), and intrahospital mortality was recorded in 13 versus 456 (7.0 vs. 1.8%) patients. In multivariable logistic regression models, paraplegic status independently predicted higher overall CCT use (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, p < 0.001) as well as fourfold higher in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001), higher infection rate (OR 2.5, p < 0.001), higher blood transfusion rate (OR 1.45, p = 0.009), and higher intraoperative (OR 1.56, p = 0.02), wound (OR 1.89, p = 0.01), and pulmonary (OR 1.72, p = 0.004) complication rates. CONCLUSION Paraplegic patients contemplating RC should be counseled about fourfold higher risk of in-hospital mortality and higher rates of other untoward effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Falkenbach F, Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Longoni M, Marmiroli A, Le QC, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Longo N, Micali S, Briganti A, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Budäus L, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI. Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy in Leukemia History Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2764. [PMID: 39123490 PMCID: PMC11311396 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Leukemia history affects some radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. Although its prevalence and effect as an adverse risk factor are well known in cardiac surgery, the number of RP patients with a leukemia history, as well as their rate of adverse in-hospital outcomes, are unknown. METHODS We identified RP patients (National Inpatient Sample 2000-2019), stratified according to the presence or absence of a leukemia history. Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM, ratio 1:10), and multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS Of 259,939 RP patients, 416 (0.2%) had a leukemia history. Their proportion increased from 0.1 to 0.2% covering the study span (p < 0.01). Leukemia history patients were older (median age, 64 vs. 62 years, p < 0.001). After PSM for age, insurance status, ethnicity, pelvic lymph node dissection, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, leukemia history RP patients exhibited higher rates of acute kidney injury (<2.6 vs. 0.9%; Odds Ratio [OR] 2.0, p = 0.02), more frequently underwent dialysis (3.6 vs. 1.9%; OR 1.9, p = 0.03), and more frequently had a length of stay exceeding one week (4.8 vs. 2.5%; OR 2.0, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Although leukemia history RP patients are rare, their numbers have increased. Renal complications and extended hospital stays are more frequent in those individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Jordan A. Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19111, Jordan
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Siech C, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Kosiba M, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Critical care therapy use after radical cystectomy in patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer. Curr Probl Surg 2024; 61:101526. [PMID: 39098327 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Siech C, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Kosiba M, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative Complications and In-Hospital Mortality in Partial and Radical Nephrectomy Patients with Heart-Valve Replacement. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5449-5456. [PMID: 38526833 PMCID: PMC11236841 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15228-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In-hospital mortality and complication rates after partial and radical nephrectomy in patients with history of heart-valve replacement are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019), kidney cancer patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy were stratified according to presence or absence of heart-valve replacement. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models addressed adverse hospital outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 39,673 patients underwent partial nephrectomy versus 94,890 radical nephrectomy. Of those, 248 (0.6%) and 676 (0.7%) had a history of heart-valve replacement. Heart-valve replacement patients were older (median partial nephrectomy 69 versus 60 years; radical nephrectomy 71 versus 63 years), and more frequently exhibited Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (partial nephrectomy 22 versus 12%; radical nephrectomy 32 versus 23%). In partial nephrectomy patients, history of heart-valve replacement increased the risk of cardiac complications [odds ratio (OR) 4.33; p < 0.001), blood transfusions (OR 2.00; p < 0.001), intraoperative complications (OR 1.53; p = 0.03), and longer hospital stay [rate ratio (RR) 1.25; p < 0.001], but not in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5). In radical nephrectomy patients, history of heart-valve replacement increased risk of postoperative bleeding (OR 4.13; p < 0.001), cardiac complications (OR 2.72; p < 0.001), intraoperative complications (OR 1.53; p < 0.001), blood transfusions (OR 1.27; p = 0.02), and longer hospital stay (RR 1.12; p < 0.001), but not in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS History of heart-valve replacement independently predicted four of twelve adverse outcomes in partial nephrectomy and five of twelve adverse outcomes in radical nephrectomy patients including intraoperative and cardiac complications, blood transfusions, and longer hospital stay. Conversely, no statistically significant differences were observed in in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Siech C, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Banek S, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Use of inpatient palliative care in metastatic urethral cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:221.e17-221.e22. [PMID: 38627106 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In metastatic urethral cancer, temporal trends, and patterns of inpatient palliative care (IPC) use are unknown. METHODS Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2006-2019), metastatic urethral cancer patients were stratified according to IPC use. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) analyses and multivariable logistic regression models (LRM) for the prediction of IPC use were fitted. RESULTS Of 1,106 metastatic urethral cancer patients, 199 (18%) received IPC. IPC use increased from 5.8 to 28.0% over time in the overall cohort (EAPC +9.8%; P < 0.001), from <12.5 to 35.1% (EAPC +11.2%; P < 0.001), and from <12.5 to 24.7% (EAPC +9.4%; P = 0.01) in respectively females and males. Lowest IPC rates were recorded in the Midwest (13.5%) vs. highest in the South (22.5%). IPC patients were more frequently female (44 vs. 37%), and more frequently exhibited bone metastases (45 vs. 34%). In multivariable LRM, female sex (multivariable odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.02; P = 0.02), and bone metastases (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.02-2.10; P = 0.04) independently predicted higher IPC rates. Conversely, hospitalization in the Midwest (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.91; P = 0.02), and in the Northeast (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.28-0.82; P = 0.01) were both associated with lower IPC use than hospitalization in the West. CONCLUSION IPC use in metastatic urethral cancer increased from a marginal rate of 5.8% to as high as 28%. Ideally, differences according to sex, metastatic site, and region should be addressed to improve IPC use rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Séverine Banek
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siech C, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Kosiba M, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative complications and in-hospital mortality in radical cystectomy patients with heart-valve replacement. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108297. [PMID: 38581754 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess in-hospital mortality and complication rates after radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with history of heart-valve replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019), non-metastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing RC were stratified according to history of heart-valve replacement. Regression models (RM) predicted hospital outcomes. RESULTS Of 25,535 RC patients, 250 (1.0%) harbored history of heart-valve replacement. Heart-valve replacement patients were older (median 74 vs. 70 years), more frequently male (87.2 vs. 80.6%), and more frequently had Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (26.8 vs. 18.9%). In RC patients with history of heart-valve replacement vs. others, 62 vs. 2634 (24.8 vs. 10.4%) experienced cardiac complications, 28 vs. 3092 (11.2 vs. 12.2%) intraoperative complications, 11 vs. 1046 (4.4 vs. 4.1%) infections, <11 vs. 594 (<4.4 vs. 2.3%) perioperative bleeding, <11 vs. 699 (<4.4 vs. 2.8%) vascular complications, 74 vs. 6225 (29.6 vs. 24.7%) received blood transfusions, 37 vs. 3054 (14.8 vs. 12.1%) critical care therapy (CCT), and in-hospital mortality was recorded in <11 vs. 463 (<4.4 vs. 1.8%) patients. In multivariable RM, history of heart-valve replacement independently predicted cardiac complications (odds ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.62-2.99; p < 0.001). Conversely, no statically significant association was recorded between history of heart-valve replacement and length of stay, estimated hospital cost, intraoperative complications, perioperative bleeding, vascular complications, infections, blood transfusions, CCT use, and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS Radical cystectomy patients with history of heart-valve replacement exhibited a 2.2-fold higher risk of cardiac complications, but no other complications, including no significantly higher in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ali HJ, Sahay S. End-of-Life and Palliative Care Issues for Patients Living with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Barriers and Opportunities. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 44:866-876. [PMID: 37459883 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive, incurable disease that results in significant symptom burden, health care utilization, and eventually premature death. Despite the advancements made in treatment and management strategies, survival has remained poor. End-of-life care is a challenging issue in management of PAH, especially when patients are in younger age group. End-of-life care revolves around symptom palliation and reducing psychosocial disease burden for a dying patient and entails advanced care planning that are often challenging. Thus, support from palliative care specialist becomes extremely important in these patients. Early introduction to palliative care in patients with high symptom burden and psychosocial suffering is suggested. Despite of the benefits of an early intervention, palliative care remains underutilized in patients with PAH, and this significantly raises issues around end-of-life care in PAH. In this review, we will discuss the opportunities offered and the existing barriers in addressing high symptom burden and end-of-life care issues. We will focus on the current evidence, identify areas for future research, and provide a call-to-action for better guidance to PAH specialists in making timely, appropriate interventions that can help mitigate end-of-life care issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon-Ju Ali
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Sandeep Sahay
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Houston Methodist Lung Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shen L, Chen L, Zhou Y, Chen T, Han H, Xia Q, Liu Z. Temporal trends and barriers for inpatient palliative care referral in metastatic gynecologic cancer patients receiving specific critical care therapies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1173438. [PMID: 37927460 PMCID: PMC10620795 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1173438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Existing evidence suggests that palliative care (PC) is highly underutilized in metastatic gynecologic cancer (mGCa). This study aims to explore temporal trends and predictors for inpatient PC referral in mGCa patients who received specific critical care therapies (CCT). Methods The National Inpatient Sample from 2003 to 2015 was used to identify mGCa patients receiving CCT. Basic characteristics were compared between patients with and without PC. Annual percentage change (APC) was estimated to reflect the temporal trend in the entire cohort and subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to explore potential predictors of inpatient PC referral. Results In total, 122,981 mGCa patients were identified, of whom 10,380 received CCT. Among these, 1,208 (11.64%) received inpatient PC. Overall, the rate of PC referral increased from 1.81% in 2003 to 26.30% in 2015 (APC: 29.08%). A higher increase in PC usage was found in white patients (APC: 30.81%), medium-sized hospitals (APC: 31.43%), the Midwest region (APC: 33.84%), and among patients with ovarian cancer (APC: 31.35%). Multivariable analysis suggested that medium bedsize, large bedsize, Midwest region, West region, uterine cancer and cervical cancer were related to increased PC use, while metastatic sites from lymph nodes and genital organs were related to lower PC referral. Conclusion Further studies are warranted to better illustrate the barriers for PC and finally improve the delivery of optimal end-of-life care for mGCa patients who receive inpatient CCT, especially for those diagnosed with ovarian cancer or admitted to small scale and Northeast hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Shen
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Aoyang Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhangjiagang, China
| | - Longpei Chen
- Department of Oncology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Aoyang Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhangjiagang, China
| | - Tianran Chen
- Department of Oncology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hedong Han
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiuyan Xia
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Aoyang Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhangjiagang, China
| | - Zhanguo Liu
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Aoyang Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhangjiagang, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Han HJ, Yeh JC, McNichol M, Buss MK. Delivering Palliative Care to Hospitalized Oncology Patients: A Scoping Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:e137-e153. [PMID: 36243248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Early, longitudinal integration of palliative care (PC) is recommended for patients with advanced cancer, in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Despite the growth of specialty PC teams in the last decade, the majority of PC is still delivered in the inpatient setting using a traditional referral-based consult delivery model. However, traditional consultation can lead to significant variation or delay in inpatient PC utilization. New care delivery models and strategies are emerging to deliver PC to hospitalized oncology patients who would most benefit from their services and to better align with professional society recommendations. OBJECTIVES To identify different care models to deliver PC to ho`spitalized oncology patients and summarize their impact on patient and health system-related outcomes. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles from 2006 to 2021 evaluating delivery of PC to oncology patients in acute inpatient care. We abstracted study characteristics, the study's intervention and comparison arms, and outcomes related to specialty PC intervention. RESULTS We identified four delivery models that have been reported to deliver PC: 1) traditional referral-based consultation, 2) criterion-based or "triggered" consultation, 3) co-rounding with primary inpatient team, and 4) PC clinicians serving as the primary team. We summarize the known outcomes data from each model, and compare the benefits and limitations of each model. CONCLUSION Our findings provide guidance to health systems about care delivery models to deploy and implement inpatient PC resources to best serve their unique populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry J Han
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care (H.J.H., J.C.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Jonathan C Yeh
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care (H.J.H., J.C.Y.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan McNichol
- Division of Knowledge Services, Department of Information Services (M.M.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary K Buss
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine (M.K.B.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Oud L. Critical illness in patients with metastatic cancer: a population-based cohort study of epidemiology and outcomes. J Investig Med 2021; 70:820-828. [PMID: 34535559 DOI: 10.1136/jim-2021-002032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The appropriateness of intensive care unit (ICU) admission of patients with metastatic cancer remains debated. We aimed to examine the short-term outcomes and their temporal pattern in critically ill patients with metastatic disease. We used state-wide data to identify hospitalizations aged ≥18 years with metastatic cancer admitted to ICU in Texas during 2010-2014. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the factors associated with short-term mortality and its temporal trends among all ICU admissions and those undergoing mechanical ventilation. Among 136,644 ICU admissions with metastatic cancer, 50.8% were aged ≥65 years, with one or more organ failures present in 53.3% and mechanical ventilation was used in 11.1%. The crude short-term mortality among all ICU admissions and those mechanically ventilated was 28.1% and 62.0%, respectively. Discharge to home occurred in 57.1% of all ICU admissions. On adjusted analyses, short-term mortality increased with rising number of organ failures (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.399, 95% CI 1.374 to 1.425), while being lower with chemotherapy (aOR 0.467, 95% CI 0.432 to 0.506) and radiation therapy (aOR 0.832, 95% CI 0.749 to 0.924), and decreased over time (aOR 0.934 per year, 95% CI 0.924 to 0.945). Predictors of short-term mortality were largely similar among those undergoing mechanical ventilation. Most ICU admissions with metastatic cancer survived hospitalization, although short-term mortality was very high among those undergoing mechanical ventilation. Short-term mortality decreased over time and was lower among those receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy. These findings support consideration of critical care in patients with metastatic cancer, but underscore the need to address patient-centered goals of care ahead of ICU admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavi Oud
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at the Permian Basin, Odessa, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Portable Medical Orders and End of Life Measures in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood Adv 2021; 5:5554-5564. [PMID: 34525170 PMCID: PMC8714721 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with AML or MDS often receive high-intensity care near EOL, including admission to the hospital/ICU and life-sustaining treatments. Completion of a portable medical order form >30 days before death was associated with lower intensity care near the end of life.
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) experience high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital death at the end of life. Early goals-of-care (GOC) discussions may reduce the intensity of end-of-life (EOL) care. Portable Medical Order forms, known as Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) forms in New York state, assist patients in translating GOC discussions into specific medical orders that communicate their wishes during a medical emergency. To determine whether the timing of completion of a MOLST form is associated with EOL care in patients with AML or MDS, we conducted a retrospective study of 358 adult patients with AML or MDS treated at a single academic center and its affiliated sites, who died during a 5-year period. One-third of patients completed at least 1 MOLST form >30 days before death. Compared with patients who completed a MOLST form within 30 days of death or never, those who completed a MOLST form >30 days before death were less likely to receive transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.39; P < .01), chemotherapy (AOR, 0.24; P < .01), or life-sustaining treatments (AOR, 0.21; P < .01) or to be admitted to the ICU (AOR, 0.21; P < .01) at EOL. They were also more likely to use hospice services (AOR, 2.72; P < .01). Earlier MOLST form completion was associated with lower intensity of care near EOL in patients with MDS or AML.
Collapse
|
26
|
Price M, Howell EP, Dalton T, Ramirez L, Howell C, Williamson T, Fecci PE, Anders CK, Check DK, Kamal AH, Goodwin CR. Inpatient palliative care utilization for patients with brain metastases. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 8:441-450. [PMID: 34277022 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Given the high symptom burden and complex clinical decision making associated with a diagnosis of brain metastases (BM), specialty palliative care (PC) can meaningfully improve patient quality of life. However, no prior study has formally evaluated patient-specific factors associated with PC consultation among BM patients. Methods We examined the rates of PC consults in a cohort of 1303 patients with BM admitted to three tertiary medical centers from October 2015 to December 2018. Patient demographics, surgical status, 30-day readmission, and death data were collected via retrospective chart review. PC utilization was assessed by identifying encounters for which an inpatient consult to PC was placed. Statistical analyses were performed to compare characteristics and outcomes between patients who did and did not receive PC consults. Results We analyzed 1303 patients admitted to the hospital with BM. The average overall rate of inpatient PC consultation was 19.6%. Rates of PC utilization differed significantly by patient race (17.5% in White/Caucasian vs 26.0% in Black/African American patients, P = .0014). Patients who received surgery during their admission had significantly lower rates of PC consultation (3.9% vs 22.4%, P < .0001). Patients who either died during their admission or were discharged to hospice had significantly higher rates of PC than those who were discharged home or to rehabilitation (P < .0001). Conclusions In our dataset, PC consultation rates varied by patient demographic, surgical status, discharging service, and practice setting. Further work is needed to identify the specific barriers to optimally utilizing specialty PC in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Price
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth P Howell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tara Dalton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Luis Ramirez
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Claire Howell
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Devon K Check
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Inpatient Palliative Care Use Among Critically III Brain Metastasis Patients in the United States. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 43:806-812. [PMID: 32804776 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to understand the trends and characteristics of palliative care delivery among critically ill brain metastasis patients using a nationally representative database. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample data collected during 2005 to 2014. This study included critically ill patients, 18 years and above, diagnosed with brain metastasis, identified using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes. Multivariable logistic regression models were used for predicting factors associated with inpatient palliative care use. RESULTS Among 18,309 critically ill patients with brain metastasis, 3298 (18.0%) received inpatient palliative care. The rate of inpatient palliative care use among these patients increased from 3.2% to 28.5%, during 2005 to 2014 (P<0.001). Regression analysis showed that hospital teaching status (odds ratio [ORs], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.84), primaries located in head and neck (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21-2.05) or lung (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22-1.44), and primary diagnosis of pneumonia (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.22-1.97) or septicemia (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.30-1.97), were associated with higher palliative care use. Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96), and hospital location in Northeast (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96), Midwest (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87), or South (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.86) were associated with lower palliative care use. CONCLUSIONS Inpatient palliative care use increased significantly among critically ill patients with brain metastases, though overall rate was low. There were geographical and racial disparities among these patients. Health care providers and policy makers should focus on decreasing these disparities. In addition, hospitals should focus on adopting more palliative care services.
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen Y, Lin S, Zhu Y, Xu R, Lan X, Xiang F, Li X, Zhang Y, Chen S, Yu H, Wu D, Zang J, Tang J, Jin J, Han H, Tao Z, Zhou Y, Hu X. Prevalence, trend and disparities of palliative care utilization among hospitalized metastatic breast cancer patients who received critical care therapies. Breast 2020; 54:264-271. [PMID: 33212422 PMCID: PMC7679246 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early integration of palliative care (PC) for patients with advanced cancer has been recommended to improve quality of care. This study aims to describe prevalence, temporal trend and predictors of PC use in metastatic breast cancer (mBCa) patients receiving critical care therapies (CCT; included invasive mechanic ventilation, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, total parenteral nutrition, tracheostomy and dialysis). METHODS The National Inpatient Sample was queried for mBCa patients receiving CCT between 2005 and 2014. Annual percent changes (APC) were calculated for PC prevalence in the overall cohort and subgroups. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to explore predictors of PC use. RESULTS Of 5833 mBCa patients receiving CCT, 880 (15.09%) received PC. Rate of PC use increased significantly from 2.53% in 2005 to 25.96% in 2014 (APC: 35.75%; p < 0.0001). Higher increase in PC use was observed in South (from 0.65% to 27.11%; APC: 59.42%; p < 0.0001), medium bedsize hospitals (from 3.75% to 26.05%; APC: 38.16%; p = 0.0006) and urban teaching hospitals (from 4.13% to 29.86%; APC: 37.33%; p = 0.0005). Multivariable analysis revealed that year interval, urban teaching hospitals, and invasive mechanical ventilation were associated with increased PC use, while primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders, fractures, metastatic sites from lymph nodes and tracheostomy were associated with lower PC use. CONCLUSIONS PC use in mBCa patients receiving CCT increases significantly over the period. However, it still remains low. Efforts to illustrate disparities in PC use are needed to improve quality of care for mBCa patients receiving CCT, especially for those hospitalized in rural and nonteaching hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuchen Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yihui Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rui Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaohong Lan
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Fang Xiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shudong Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hao Yu
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Dongni Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Juxiang Zang
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiali Tang
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiewen Jin
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hedong Han
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Zhonghua Tao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yonggang Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Loofs TS, Haubrick K. End-of-Life Nutrition Considerations: Attitudes, Beliefs, and Outcomes. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 38:1028-1041. [PMID: 32945174 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120960124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the physiological outcomes and interpersonal influences that should be considered when making the decision to provide artificial nutrition and hydration (AN&H) for patients in hospice/palliative programs. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist. Distinct search strategies were employed to find primary research articles that addressed: General health outcomes of artificial nutrition and hydration interventions and nutrition therapy interventions (n = 16), nutrition-related symptoms in end-of-life care (n = 8), and the attitudes of patients and providers toward artificial nutrition and hydration (n = 21). RESULTS The effect of AN&H on health outcomes, quality-of-life measures and nutrition-related symptoms is limited and may vary by patient setting and diagnosis. In the absence of consistent evidence for specific health outcomes, decisions regarding AN&H should be made in context of the desires and beliefs of a patient, their family, and their medical providers. These beliefs may not be consistent with likely outcomes or may be inconsistent between individuals involved in the decision-making process, and individuals of different cultures or geographic regions may approach AN&H decisions from different perspectives. To help navigate the intersection of nutrition-related health outcomes and patient/provider beliefs, palliative care teams may employ a variety of strategies for approaching the decision-making process, and may benefit from specific involvement of a Registered Dietitian to help contribute to or lead these discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler S Loofs
- St. David's Georgetown Hospital, Georgetown, TX, USA
| | - Kevin Haubrick
- 165982The University of Houston College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cheng BT, Wangmo T. Palliative care utilization in hospitalized children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28013. [PMID: 31612605 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing evidence that palliative care (PC) is associated with increased quality of life in children with cancer. Despite increasing recommendations in support of PC to improve pediatric oncology care, little is known about its patterns of use. METHODS We analyzed the 2005-2011 National Inpatient Sample, a representative, cross-sectional sample of US hospital admissions. Our study cohort comprised 10 960 hospitalizations of children with cancer and high in-hospital mortality risk. Survey-weighted regression models were constructed to determine associations of person- and hospital-level characteristics with PC involvement and healthcare costs. RESULTS Overall, 4.4% of hospitalizations included PC involvement. In regression models invoking stepwise variable selection, a shorter length of stay (PC vs no PC; mean: 23.9 vs 32.6 days), solid cancer (solid vs hematologic vs brain cancer; PC use: 7.4% vs 2.8% vs 5.5%), and older age (PC vs no PC; mean: 10.2 vs 8.9 years) were associated with PC use. PC utilization was also associated with lower overall and daily hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS One in 20 pediatric inpatients with cancer and high mortality risk receives PC, with differential utilization by socio-economic groups. These results have significant implications for public health resource allocation and the delivery of pediatric PC as high-value care. Future research should focus on the development of new tools to help physicians assess when PC is appropriate for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mazzone E, Mistretta FA, Knipper S, Tian Z, Palumbo C, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Shariat SF, Saad F, Montorsi F, Graefen M, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Temporal trends and social barriers for inpatient palliative care delivery in metastatic prostate cancer patients receiving critical care therapies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2019; 23:260-268. [PMID: 31685982 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0183-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of inpatient palliative care (IPC) in advanced cancer patients represents a well-established guideline recommendation. A recent analysis demonstrated that genitourinary (GU) cancer patients benefited of IPC at the second lowest rate within the four examined primaries, namely lung, breast, colorectal, and GU. Based on this observation, we examined temporal trends and predictors of IPC use in metastatic prostate cancer patients receiving critical care therapies (CCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified mPCa patients receiving CCT within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2004-2015). IPC use rates were evaluated using univariable estimated annual percentage changes analyses. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used after adjustment for clustering at hospital level. RESULTS Of 4168 mPCa patients receiving CCT, 449 (11.3%) received IPC. IPC use increased from 1.2 to 22.3% (EAPC: +19.6%, p < 0.001). After stratification according to regions, race, and teaching status, the highest increase of IPC use was recorded in the South (from 0 to 25.4 %, EAPC: +27.6%), in Caucasians (from 1.5 to 24.4 %, EAPC: +19.8%; p < 0.001) and in teaching hospitals (from 0.9 to 26.2 %, EAPC: +19.6%; p < 0.001). In MLR models, teaching status (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.74, p < 0.001) and contemporary year interval (OR: 4.63, p < 0.001) were associated with higher IPC rates. Conversely, African American race (OR: 0.66, p < 0.001) and primary diagnosis of GU disorders (OR: 0.49, p < 0.001) and gastrointestinal (GI) disorders at admission (OR: 0.61, p = 0.02) were associated with lower IPC rates. CONCLUSIONS IPC use rate in mPCa patients receiving CCT sharply increased between 2004 and 2015. The highest increase of IPC use across time was recorded in the South, in Caucasian race, and in teaching hospitals. African-American race and nonteaching status were identified as independent predictors of lower IPC use and represent targets for efforts aimed at improving IPC delivery in mPCa patients receiving CCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Mazzone
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. .,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Martini Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|