Preoperative serum CEA and CA19-9 in gastric cancer--a single tertiary hospital study of 1,075 cases

Serum miR-30c serves as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC)，the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and thus early detection, is considered critical for diagnosis and treatment of this disease. It is well known that measurement of microRNA (miRNA) may serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for GC. The aim of this study was to determine whether miR-30c was present in patients with gastric cancer and to correlate relative expression with patient survival. A total of 162 GC patients and 150 healthy controls were recruited. miR-30c levels were quantified in serum using quantitative real-time PCR(QRT-PCR). The sensitivity and specificity of circulating miR-30c was compared to carbohydrate antigen (CA) CA72-4, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), 3 known markers associated with GC. QRT-PCR demonstrated downregulation of gene expression of miR-30c in GC patients. Downregulation of miR-30c gene expression was significantly correlated with stage of cancer, lymphatic metastasis, and distal metastasis. The sensitivity to detect GC of miR-30c, CA72-4, CA19-9, and CEA in serum of GC was 80%, 43%, 21%, and 42%, respectively, while specificity was 89%, 57%, 30%, and 78% respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the presence of low gene expression of miR-30c was effective in predicting poor prognosis in GC patients. Our data suggest that circulating serum miR-30c concentrations may serve as a reliable biomarker for GC occurrence. (212words).

Diagnostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index combined with CEA in gastric cancer with lymph node metastasis

Background

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), systemic immune-inflammation index(SII), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are diagnostic markers for cancer, but their combined significance in gastric cancer (GC) with lymph node metastasis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between these serum biomarkers and lymph node metastasis in patients with GC.

Methods

Records of patients with GC were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to examine the association between tumor markers, serum biomarkers and lymph node metastasis in GC. Based on the results of multivariate regression, a nomogram was developed and verified.

Results

Of the 395 patients aged 68.5 ± 9.1 years, 192 (48.6%) were diagnosed with lymphatic node metastasis. After adjusting for confounding factors, CEA (Odd ratio (OR):2.21; 95%CI: 1.17-3.81) and SII (OR:1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.04) was identified as significant risk factors, while PNI (OR:0.90; 95%CI: 0.85~0.96) was a protective factor for lymph node metastasis. The established nomogram by incorporating CEA, SII, PNI, differentiation, and tumor diameter can effectively predict lymph node metastasis in GC.

Conclusion

CEA, SII, PNI, differentiation, and tumor diameter were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with GC, and the combination of CEA, SII, PNI, differentiation, and tumor diameter has a better diagnostic value than either index alone.

Serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4, carbohydrate antigen 24-2, ferritin) and gastric cancer prognosis correlation

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a kind of malignant tumor which is prevalent all over the world. Although some progress has been made in the treatment of gastric cancer, its prognosis is still not optimistic, so it is of great significance to find reliable prognostic indicators to guide the treatment and management of patients with gastric cancer.

AIM

To explore the relationship between serum levels of five biomarkers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CA72-4, CA24-2, and ferritin] and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

This study included 200 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, and conducted an in-depth analysis of their baseline characteristics, relationship between tumor markers and staging, and prognosis. The study found that CA19-9 has a significant correlation with tumor stage, the average levels of CA24-2, CEA, CA72-4 and ferritin were slightly increased disregarding the stage of tumor. Survival analysis showed that increases in CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2, and ferritin were all associated with shortened overall survival of patients. Further multivariate analysis revealed that elevated serum CA72-4 levels were an independent adverse prognostic factor.

RESULTS

This study reveals that there is a significant correlation between the expression levels of serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, CA24-2 and ferritin in patients with gastric cancer and prognosis, and can be used as important indicators for prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer. In particular, markers that appear abnormally elevated initially may help identify gastric cancer patients with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Serum CEA and CA19-9 play an important role in the prognosis assessment of gastric cancer, and are effective tools to guide clinical practice and optimize individualized treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients.

Prognostic significance of serum tumor markers in various pathologic subtypes of gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the utility of 6 serum tumor markers in prognosis between gastric adenocarcinoma and gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

METHODS

A cohort of 3131 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma and 275 cases of gastric SRCC was assembled. The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), and carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724) were measured in all cases. The study analyzed the association between the levels of these 6 tumor markers and the prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma and SRCC.

RESULTS

The study revealed that gastric SRCC exhibited lower concentrations of CEA (P < .001) and CA19-9 (P = .002), along with reduced positive rates of CEA (P = .041), CA19-9 (P = .003), AFP (P < .001), and CA242 (P = .006), while displaying higher positive rates of CA724 (P = .024) than gastric adenocarcinoma. Nevertheless, the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that serum tumor markers did not hold clinical significance in differentiating between gastric adenocarcinoma and SRCC. Survival analysis substantiated that the combined criteria of serum tumor markers stood as an independent risk factor for both gastric adenocarcinoma and SRCC. Notably, the nomogram indicated that serum tumor markers exerted a more substantial influence on the prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma than on gastric SRCC.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that the combined criteria of serum tumor markers emerge as independent risk factors for both subtypes of gastric cancer. Furthermore, this combined approach exhibited enhanced efficacy in prognosticating the outcome of gastric adenocarcinoma compared with gastric SRCC.

A predictive nomogram developed and validated for gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers

Aim: To predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers. Materials & methods: Prognostic factors of the nomogram were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Calibration and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy. Decision curve analysis and concordance indexes were utilized to compare the nomogram with the pathological tumor, node, metastasis stage. Results: A nomogram incorporating log odds of positive lymph nodes, tumor size and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio was constructed. The calibration and receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve >0.85) showed high accuracy in predicting overall survival. The concordance indexes (0.832 vs 0.760; p < 0.001) and decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was superior to the pathological tumor, node, metastasis stage. Conclusion: A prediction and risk stratification nomogram has been developed and validated for gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers.

Development and external validation of a radiomics model for assessment of HER2 positivity in men and women presenting with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

To develop and externally validate a conventional CT-based radiomics model for identifying HER2-positive status in gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

950 GC patients who underwent pretreatment CT were retrospectively enrolled and assigned into a training cohort (n = 388, conventional CT), an internal validation cohort (n = 325, conventional CT) and an external validation cohort (n = 237, dual-energy CT, DECT). Radiomics features were extracted from venous phase images to construct the "Radscore". On the basis of univariate and multivariate analyses, a conventional CT-based radiomics model was built in the training cohort, combining significant clinical-laboratory characteristics and Radscore. The model was assessed and validated regarding its diagnostic effectiveness and clinical practicability using AUC and decision curve analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Location, clinical TNM staging, CEA, CA199, and Radscore were independent predictors of HER2 status (all p < 0.05). Integrating these five indicators, the proposed model exerted a favorable diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.732 (95%CI 0.683-0.781), 0.703 (95%CI 0.624-0.783), and 0.711 (95%CI 0.625-0.798) observed for the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Meanwhile, the model would offer more net benefits than the default simple schemes and its performance was not affected by the age, gender, location, immunohistochemistry results, and type of tissue for confirmation (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The conventional CT-based radiomics model had a good diagnostic performance of HER2 positivity in GC and the potential to generalize to DECT, which is beneficial to simplify clinical workflow and help clinicians initially identify potential candidates who might benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

Development and Validation of Tumor Marker Indices in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Tumor markers (TMs) are important for the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic importance of the tumor marker index (TMI) based on GC-specific TMs for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) still needs to be further explored.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients who underwent radical gastric cancer surgery between February 2014 and June 2016 at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University. The patients were divided into training and validation groups. TMI was determined as the geometric mean of the standard cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Patient overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognosis-associated risk factors were identified using Cox hazard regression models. A nomogram model incorporating TMI and clinicopathological factors was developed, and its performance was evaluated using a decision curve analysis, concordance index, and calibration plots.

RESULTS

In the TMI training cohort, the cutoff value was set at .439, categorizing patients into TMI-High and TMI-Low groups. The 5-year survival rate in the TMI-Low group significantly surpassed that in the TMI-High group (78.2% vs 58.1% and 49.7 vs 41.6, P < .001). TMI emerged as an independent prognostic factor. The nomogram accurately predicted patient prognosis by using TMI and clinicopathological characteristics. Validation of the TMI in the independent cohort yielded satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

The TMI constructed based on specific TMs associated with gastric cancer can offer a precise prognostic prediction for patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcome of resectable gastric cancer patients with small para-aortic lymph node

Background

Resectable gastric cancer (GC) patients with small para-aortic lymph node (smaller than 10mm in diameter, sPAN) were seldom reported, and existing guidelines did not provide definite treatment recommendation for them.

Methods

A total of 667 consecutive resectable GC patients were enrolled. 98 patients were in the sPAN group, and 569 patients without enlarged para-aortic lymph node were in the nPAN group. Standard D2 lymphadenectomy was performed. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy were administrated according to the cTNM and pTNM stage, respectively. Clinicopathological features and prognosis were compared between these two groups.

Results

The median size of sPAN was 6 (range, 2-9) mm and the distribution was prevalent in No. 16b1. cN stage (p=0.001) was significantly related to the presence of sPAN. sPAN was both independent risk factor for OS (p=0.031) and RFS (p=0.046) of all patients. The prognosis of patients with sPAN was significantly worse than that of patients with nPAN (OS: p=0.008; RFS: p=0.007). Preoperative CEA and CA19-9 were independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with sPAN. Furthermore, patients in the sPAN group with normal CEA and CA19-9 exhibited acceptable prognosis (5-year OS: 67%; RFS: 64%), while those with elevated CEA or CA19-9 suffered significantly poorer prognosis (5-year OS: 17%; RFS: 17%) than patients in the nPAN group (5-year OS: 64%; RFS 62%) (both p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Standard D2 lymphadenectomy should be considered a valid approach for GC patients with sPAN associate to normal preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels. Patients with sPAN associated to elevated CEA or CA19-9 levels could benefit from a multimodal approach: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical surgery with D2 plus lymph nodal dissection extended to No. 16 station.

Novel Drug Delivery Systems as an Emerging Platform for Stomach Cancer Therapy

Cancer has long been regarded as one of the world's most fatal diseases, claiming the lives of countless individuals each year. Stomach cancer is a prevalent cancer that has recently reached a high number of fatalities. It continues to be one of the most fatal cancer forms, requiring immediate attention due to its low overall survival rate. Early detection and appropriate therapy are, perhaps, of the most difficult challenges in the fight against stomach cancer. We focused on positive tactics for stomach cancer therapy in this paper, and we went over the most current advancements and progressions of nanotechnology-based systems in modern drug delivery and therapies in great detail. Recent therapeutic tactics used in nanotechnology-based delivery of drugs aim to improve cellular absorption, pharmacokinetics, and anticancer drug efficacy, allowing for more precise targeting of specific agents for effective stomach cancer treatment. The current review also provides information on ongoing research aimed at improving the curative effectiveness of existing anti-stomach cancer medicines. All these crucial matters discussed under one overarching title will be extremely useful to readers who are working on developing multi-functional nano-constructs for improved diagnosis and treatment of stomach cancer.

Plasma thioredoxin reductase: a potential diagnostic biomarker for gastric cancer

To improve the early detection of gastric cancer (GC), there is a growing need for novel and efficient biomarkers. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic value of thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1), which was found to be overexpressed in various malignancies. We found that TXNRD1 has a higher expression level in GC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues, and high TXNRD1 expression was significantly associated with poor outcomes of GC patients. Next, a total of 1446 cases were collected, with 896 cases in gastric cancer, 322 in benign gastric disease and 228 in healthy controls. We noticed plasma thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) level in GC [8.4 (7.1, 9.7) U/mL] was significantly higher than that in benign disease [6.1 (5.4, 7.2) U/mL] or healthy controls [3.7 (1.7, 5.6) U/mL]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value of TrxR activity for GC diagnosis was set at 5.75 U/mL with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.945. Moreover, a combined panel of TrxR and routine tumor markers could further elevate the diagnostic efficacy compared to a single biomarker. Finally, by measuring pre- and post-treatment TrxR activity and routine tumor markers, we found the change trend of them was broadly consistent, and plasma TrxR activity was significantly decreased in patients treated with platinum/fluorouracil-based therapy. Our findings recommend plasma TrxR activity combined with tumor markers as effective diagnostic tools for GC patients. As well, plasma TrxR has the potential to monitor therapeutic efficacy.

Association of multiple tumor markers with newly diagnosed gastric cancer patients: a retrospective study

Background

The purpose of this paper was to explore the correlation between multiple tumor markers and newly diagnosed gastric cancer.

Methods

We selected 268 newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer and 209 healthy subjects for correlation research. The detection of multiple tumor markers was based on protein chips and the results were statistically analyzed using SPSS.

Results

We concluded that gastric cancer was significantly related to gender, age, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), and carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242) positive levels (P < 0.001). After CA199 and CA242 were stratified by gender, the male odds ratio (OR) was 30.400 and 31.242, respectively, while the female OR was 3.424. After CA125 was stratified by age in patients over 54 years old with gastric cancer, the risk of occurrence in the CA125-positive population was 16.673 times that of the CA125-negative patients. Among patients 54 years old and younger, being CA125-positive was not a risk factor for gastric cancer (P = 0.082). AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, and CA242 positive levels during the M1 stage were statistically significant when compared with the M0 stage and control group (P < 0.001), but the AFP (P = 0.045) and CA125 (P = 0.752) positive levels were not statistically significant when compared with the M0 stage and control group. The combined detection sensitivity of multiple tumor markers was 44.78%.

Conclusion

Our research shows that gastric cancer is associated with age, gender, and the positive levels of AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, and CA242. The positive levels of AFP and CA125 were related to the distant metastasis of gastric cancer. To a certain extent, the combined detection sensitivity can be used for the initial screening of gastric cancer.

Prognostic Value of the Combination of HB (hemoglobin) and CEA in Resectable Gastric Cancer

Objective: In order to investigate the prognostic value of a novel biomarker combining serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and hemoglobin (HB) levels in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Introduction: This retrospective study assessed the relationship between CEA, hemoglobin levels, a novel combined prognostic biomarker (HB-CEA) and clinicopathological features of gastric cancer. Their prognostic values in gastric cancer were also analyzed.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the CEA, hemoglobin levels and clinicopathological features of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional models were used to determine the prognostic significance of these factors for overall survival (OS) in the training and validation sets (n=353 and n=388, respectively). Based on optimal cutoff values of CEA and hemoglobin (3.395 ng/mL and 125.5 g/L, respectively), patients were stratified into three groups: HB-CEA=0, 1, and 2 (CEA <3.395 ng/mL and HB ≥125.5 g/L; CEA ≥3.395 ng/mL or HB <125.5 g/L; and CEA ≥3.395 ng/mL and HB <125.5 g/L, respectively).

Results: The area under the curve was larger for HB-CEA than for either HB or CEA alone (training set: 0.677, 0.650, and 0.629; validation set: 0.670, 0.605, and 0.605, respectively). HB-CEA was strongly associated with age, tumor size, differentiation, pathological TNM stage (pTNM), depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and survival status (all p<0.05). A higher HB-CEA score correlated with poor survival (Kaplan-Meier curves, all p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that HB-CEA was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Preoperative HB-CEA, as a potential novel hematological biomarker, can predict the progression of gastric cancer and the prognosis of patients, and is of great value in guiding clinical practice. Therefore, patients with a higher HB-CEA score should receive more extensive follow-up for early detection and intervention of tumor progression.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival After Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study

Background

Recurrence is the main cause of death in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients after surgery. Identifying patients with a high risk of recurrence is important for decision-making regarding neoadjuvant therapy to improve long-term outcomes.

Aim

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of pCCA.

Methods

Patients following curative resection for pCCA from January 2008 to January 2016 were identified from a multicenter database. Using random assignment, 70% of patients were assigned to the training cohort, and the remaining 30% were assigned to the validation cohort. Independent predictors of RFS after curative resection for pCCA were identified and used to construct a prognostic model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using calibration curves and the C-index.

Results

A total of 341 patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months, and the median RFS was 14 months. Independent predictors associated with RFS included lymph node involvement, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion, maximum tumor size, tumor differentiation, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The model incorporating these factors to predict 1-year RFS demonstrated better calibration and better performance than the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in both the training and validation cohorts (C-indexes: 0.723 vs. 0.641; 0.743 vs. 0.607).

Conclusions

The prognostic model could identify patients at high risk of recurrence for pCCA to inform patients and surgeons, help guide decision-making for postoperative adjuvant therapy, and improve survival.

Clinical importance of serum CEA and CA-19-9 levels in oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas

Introduction

In recent years, the incidence of gastroesophageal junction tumors has increased rapidly in worldwide.

Aim

To evaluate pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinomas regarding clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival.

Material and methods

Patients undergoing curative surgery diagnosed with OGJ adenocarcinoma in the gastrointestinal surgery clinic between 2007 and 2019 were included in the study retrospectively. Kaplan Meier and Log Rank tests were performed in survival analyses. Logistic regression analysis was performed to state the independent variables affecting survival.

Results

The mean age of the 70 patients included in the study was 59.78 ±10.49 (31–76) years. Serum CEA and CA 19-9 were high in 19 (27.1%) patients. CEA ≥ 5 ng/ml was found to be statistically significant in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and in patients with a high number of positive lymph nodes (N +) (p = 0.041 and p = 0.042, respectively). CA 19-9 positivity was statistically higher in patients with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.042 and p = 0.012, respectively). The age and N+ findings of the patients in the CA 19-9-positive group were statistically significant compared to the patients in the CA 19-9-negative group (p = 0.039 and p = 0.007, respectively). Overall survival rates of 1–3 and 5 years were statistically significantly lower in patients who were CA 19-9 positive (p = 0.016). For patients in whom both tumour markers were positive, the N+ mean value was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

In our study, a significant relationship was found in terms of overall survival and serum CA 19-9 in OGJ adenocarcinoma, and it was associated with both tumour markers being positive and the mean N+ value.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Potential of a Plasma Exosomal miRNAs Panel for Gastric Cancer

Purpose

Gastric cancer (GC) is often difficult to diagnose early in the disease and remains one of the most frequently occurring malignancies. This investigation looks at the diagnostic potential of a specific plasma exosomal miRNAs panel for GC.

Methods

This study analyzed 216 individual peripheral blood samples. 2 GEO datasets were analyzed and two miRNAs were selected - plasma exosomal miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT–PCR) was used to assess relative expressions and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic efficiency of miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p panel. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the prognostic value of plasma exosomal miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p.

Results

GC patients possessed notably raised plasma levels of exosomal miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p. The area under ROC curves (AUCs) of miR-195-5p, miR-211-5p were 0.745, 0.798 in the screening phase and 0.762, 0.798 in the training stage respectively. GC was able to be diagnosed more accurately when both miRNAs were interpreted together (AUC=0.820 in the validation stage). Poorer prognosis was observed in GC patients who had plasma exosomal miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p of higher levels. In vitro experiments also confirmed that miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p is able to be transmitted between cells, and works to enhance tumor invasion, migration and proliferation while inhibiting cell apoptosis.

Conclusion

Plasma exosomal miR-195-5p and miR-211-5p may become potential biomarkers for GC diagnosis, and may be useful in predicting tumor phenotype.

Prognostic impact of CEA/CA19-9 at the time of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the clinical impact of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) values at the time of recurrence in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

Among 790 patients with R0 resected gastric cancer without neoadjuvant therapy between 2004 and 2017, 89 recurrence cases were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical impact of CEA and CA19-9 values on recurrence sites and post-recurrent prognosis were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The positive rates of CEA and CA19-9 at recurrence were significantly higher than the preoperative positive rates (CEA, 56% vs 24%; CA19-9, 37% vs 15%). Although CA19-9-positive patients at recurrence exhibited a poor survival, the difference was not significant. The positive rates of CEA at liver or lymph node recurrence were significantly higher than the preoperative positive rates. The positive rate of CA19-9 at peritoneal recurrence was significantly higher than the preoperative positive rate. CA19-9-positive patients at recurrence exhibited worse prognosis than CA19-9-negative patients, although the difference was not significant. At lymph node recurrence, CA19-9-positive patients exhibited a significantly worse survival than CA19-9-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

In recurrent gastric cancer, the positive status of CA19-9 at recurrence might have a negative prognostic impact after recurrence; particularly, in patients with lymph node recurrence.

Study on the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer by Magnetic Beads Extraction and Mass Spectrometry

Objective. This study constructed a model for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer by comparing the serum peptides profiles of patients with advanced gastric cancer and healthy people. And that model may be the potential to be applied for the efficacy evaluation and recurrence monitoring in gastric cancer. Methods. Serums of 30 healthy people and 30 advanced gastric cancer patients were matched by age and gender were collected. The serum peptide spectrum was obtained by MB-WCX concentration and MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Based on the analysis of the efficiency of differential peptides in the diagnosis of gastric cancer, we first established a model for the diagnosis of gastric cancer based on differential peptides and then carried out external verification. The diagnostic reliability of this model was further tested by compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Results. In this present study, we found the expression of two peptide peaks with a molecular weight of 2863 Da and 2953 Da were significantly increased in gastric cancer serum, while the expression of two peptide peaks with a molecular weight of 1945 Da and 2082 Da were significantly decreased. Depending on the characteristics of peptide expression, we constructed a diagnostic model, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the model established by 2953 Da/1945 Da, and found this model is significantly higher than CEA and CA19-9. Conclusion. There were some differences in serum peptides profiles between patients with advanced gastric cancer and healthy people. The serum peptide diagnostic models based on 2953 Da and 1945 Da have high diagnostic efficiency for advanced gastric cancer. Our result indicated that this model was well worth further validation for clinical diagnosis.

Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and it is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. GC is a multifactorial disease, where both environmental and genetic factors can have an impact on its occurrence and development. The incidence rate of GC rises progressively with age; the median age at diagnosis is 70 years. However, approximately 10% of gastric carcinomas are detected at the age of 45 or younger. Early-onset gastric cancer is a good model to study genetic alterations related to the carcinogenesis process, as young patients are less exposed to environmental carcinogens. Carcinogenesis is a multistage disease process specified by the progressive development of mutations and epigenetic alterations in the expression of various genes, which are responsible for the occurrence of the disease.

Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum long non-coding RNA CTC-497E21.4 in gastric cancer

Background Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play a key role in gastric cancer (GC) tumorigenesis. However, the clinical application value of serum lncRNAs in GC has remained largely unknown. We investigated the role of a novel lncRNA named CTC-497E21.4 in the diagnosis and the prognosis of GC. Methods We focused on evaluation of lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 by real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTFQ-PCR). The study involved following aspects: (1) confirmation of the higher lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 expression in different types of GC specimens than corresponding controls; (2) evaluation of monitoring tumor dynamics by the serum lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 assay; (3) evaluation of the prognostic value of lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 assay in GC. Results (1) The method of RTFQ-PCR detection of lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 was evaluated to have high sensitivity and specificity. (2) The expression levels of lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 were higher in GC patients compared with corresponding controls (p<0.001), and the combination of serum lncRNA CTC-497E21.4, CEA and CA19-9 could improve diagnostic sensitivity (96.36%). (3) The serum lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 expression levels were lower in postoperative samples than preoperative samples (p=0.0021) and survival curves downloaded from TCGA showed high lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 levels were associated with poor OS of GC (p=0.0351). Conclusions lncRNA CTC-497E21.4 may be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and the prognosis of GC.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 expression occurring in elderly individuals: An autopsy study

The clinicopathological significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in gastric cancer (GC) remains obscure. Therefore, the current study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological value of CA19-9 in GC utilizing autopsy cases. We examined the expression of CA19-9 and mucin core proteins in GC immunohistochemically, and analyzed serum CA19-9 levels and clinicopathological variables or complications. We also investigated whether fucosyltransferases 2 and 3 (FUT2/3) allelic variants influence CA19-9 expression in GC. Compared to GC cases with negative CA19-9 expression (tCA19-9-N), those with positive CA19-9 expression (tCA19-9-P) demonstrated significant differences in characteristic features such as lymph node and distant organ metastases, lymphatic and venous permeation, and higher Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stages. Moreover, compared to GC cases with low serum CA19-9 levels (sCA19-9-L), those with high serum CA19-9 levels (sCA19-9-H) were related to venous permeation, higher proportion of lymph node and distant organ metastases, and higher TNM stages. Both tCA19-9-P GC and sCA19-9-H GC cases were significantly associated with coagulation abnormalities. sCA19-9-H GC cases correlated significantly with MUC1 and MUC5AC expression. FUT2/3 genotypes were not associated with CA19-9 expression in GC. These results suggest that CA19-9 can predict the risk of lymph node and distant metastases as well as of coagulation abnormalities.

Plasma activity of Thioredoxin Reductase as a Novel Biomarker in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading malignancies around the world. Identification of novel and efficient biomarkers for GC diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficiency could improve the therapeutic strategy in future clinical application. This study aims to evaluate the levels of plasma thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) activity in GC patients to confirm its validity and efficacy in GC diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficiency. 923 cases were enrolled in the current study. In the group of GC patients before clinical intervention, plasma TrxR activity [9.09 (7.96, 10.45) U/mL] was significantly higher than in healthy controls [3.69 (2.38, 5.32) U/mL]. The threshold of TrxR activity for GC diagnosis was set at 7.34 U/mL with a sensitivity of 85.5% and a specificity of 97.9%. In GC patients after chemotherapy, plasma TrxR activity was remarkably higher in patients with progressive disease or uncontrolled condition [10.07 (8.19, 11.02) U/mL] compared with patients with complete or partial response [7.12 (6.08, 8.37) U/mL] in response to chemotherapy. TrxR activity displayed the higher efficiency to distinguish between GC patients with two distinct clinical outcomes than carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Moreover, combination of TrxR, CEA, CA72-4 and CA19-9 was demonstrated to be more effective in both GC diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficiency than was each biomarker individually. Together, plasma TrxR activity was identified as a novel and efficient biomarker of GC, both in diagnosis and monitoring of therapeutic efficiency in response to chemotherapy.

Blood parameters score predicts long-term outcomes in stage II-III gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of laboratory blood parameters (BPM) have been reported to greatly affect the long-term outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, the existing prognostic models do not comprehensively analyze these predictors.

AIM

To construct a new prognostic tool, based on all the prognostic BPM, to achieve more accurate prognosis prediction for GC.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 850 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stage II-III GC from January 2010 to April 2013. The patients were classified into developing (n = 567) and validation (n = 283) cohorts using computer-generated random numbers. A scoring system, namely BPM score, was then constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model in the developing cohort, and validated in the validation cohort. A nomogram consisting of BPM score and tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) stage was further created. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated via Harrell's C-statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

Using the LASSO model, we established the BPM score based on five BPM: Albumin, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The BPM scores were divided into high- and low-BPM groups based on a cut-off value of -0.93. High-BPM patients were significantly older and had more advanced, larger tumors. In the developing cohort, significant differences were found in 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-specific survival between the high-BPM and low-BPM patients. Similar results were found in the validation group. Multivariable analysis showed that the BPM score was an independent predictor of OS. High-BPM patients had a poorer 5-year OS for each subgroup. Furthermore, a nomogram that combined the BPM score and TNM stage had significantly better prognostic value compared with TNM stage alone.

CONCLUSION

The BPM score provides more accurate prognosis prediction in stage II-III GC patients and is an effective complement to the TNM staging system.

Genome-wide long non-coding RNAs identified a panel of novel plasma biomarkers for gastric cancer diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Although long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are regarded as useful plasma-based biomarkers for cancer detection, the potential diagnostic value of lncRNAs in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear.

METHODS

To screen promising lncRNAs biomarkers for GC, we performed genome-wide lncRNA microarray assay between five GC cases plasma and matched healthy controls plasma. The expression of candidate plasma-related lncRNAs were validated in two-phase validation of 446 subjects. The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed for evaluating diagnostic accuracy. We also determined the origin and stability of plasma lncRNAs, and investigated biological effects of candidate lncRNAs on cellular phenotypes.

RESULTS

A total of 3878 lncRNAs were expressed differentially in GC plasma, among which the top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs were selected for further validation. A two-stage validation revealed that plasma levels of three lncRNAs (FAM49B-AS, GUSBP11, and CTDHUT) were significantly higher in GC plasma as compared with healthy controls (P < 0.05), and the combined area under curve of these lncRNAs was 0.818 (95% CI 0.772-0.864). Moreover, these lncRNAs were stable and detectable in human plasma, and also enriched in extracellular fluid. The expression levels of all three lncRNAs dropped significantly on day 10 after radical surgery compared with preoperative levels (P < 0.05). Also, lncRNA FAM49B-AS significantly promoted GC cell viability and invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma lncRNA FAM49B-AS, GUSBP11 and CTDHUT have a strong potential to serve as noninvasive biomarkers for GC diagnosis.

Preoperative CEA levels are supplementary to CA19-9 levels in predicting prognosis in patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background: There are few diagnostic tools that can be used to determine which patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can benefit from surgery actually, highlighting that the need for new preoperative stratification strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive values of preoperative biomarkers in survival analyses for patients with ICC after surgical resection.

Methods: A total of 285 patients with ICC were retrospectively reviewed. Receiver operating charateristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive effects of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) with different cutoff values and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with ICC.

Results: Preoperative CA19-9 with a cutoff value of 200 U/ml performed better in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in ICC patients. Patients with preoperative CA19-9 value > 200 U/ml generally had a poor surgical response. However, surgical resection could also benefit patients whose CA19-9 levels decreased postoperatively or preoperative CEA levels were negative.

Conclusions: With the cutoff value of 200U/ml, CA19-9 was a better preoperative biomarker for predicting survival for ICC patients after surgical resection. Combination of preoperative CA19-9 and CEA showed the strongest predictive power in survival analyses in these patients and should be recognized in daily clinical care.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis in elderly gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Little is known about the clinicopathological features and prognosis in elderly gastric cancer (GC) patients aged 65–79 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinicopathological features and prognosis in elderly GC patients.

Patients and methods

From May 2008 to December 2014, a total of 5,282 GC patients were enrolled in our present study. Patients were divided into elderly and middle-aged groups. The clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The proportion of dysphagia was significantly higher in elderly patients than that in middle-aged patients (P=0.002), whereas the proportion of abdominal pain and heartburn was significantly lower in elderly patients than that in middle-aged patients (P<0.001 vs P=0.038, respectively). The proportion of patients with carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 was significantly higher in elderly patients than that in middle-aged patients (P=0.009). There was no significant difference in clinicopathological features between elderly and middle-aged patients with D2 gastrectomy (all P>0.05). Age, tumor size, histological type, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha fetoprotein, CA19-9, and CA125 were independent risk factors for the prognosis of GC patients in univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall survival in elderly patients was significantly reduced compared with middle-aged patients (P=0.001), especially in patients with tumor size >5 cm (P=0.002), poorly differentiated tumor (P<0.000), stage III tumor (P=0.002), or normal levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (P=0.009), alpha fetoprotein (P=0.002), CA19-9 (P=0.002), and CA125 (P=0.004).

Conclusion

The clinicopathological features of elderly patients were different to those of middle-aged patients. The prognosis for elderly GC patients was significantly worse than for middle-aged patients.

Combined preoperative concentrations of CEA, CA 19-9, and 72-4 for predicting outcomes in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection

In many cancers, prognostic factors are useful for identifying high-risk patients and in individualizing treatment. We sought to determine whether a combination of tumor markers (CTM) would improve prognostic accuracy in patients with gastric cancer (GC). The CTM score, which is derived from serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4), was tested retrospectively in 1134 patients with GC undergoing curative resection between October 2000 and December 2012. The CTM score was 2 for patients with two or three elevated markers, 1 for those with one elevated marker, and 0 for those no elevated markers. Overall survival (OS) in patients with CTM scores 0, 1, and 2 was 61.8%, 31.4%, and 15.1%, respectively (P<.001). The CTM score independently predicted OS on multivariate analysis (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.21; P<.001). Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the CTM score (0.67; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.70) was higher than the values of any individual marker (0.63, 0.57, 0.57; P<.001 for all comparisons). The CTM score independently predicted postoperative survival in GC, and it may have better clinical utility than individual tumor markers for identifying high-risk patients with GC.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

As the conventional staging systems have poor prognosis prediction ability for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), we established and validated an effective prognostic nomogram for pCCA patients based on their personal and tumor characteristics. A total of 235 patients who received curative intent resections at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital from 2000 to 2009 were recruited as the primary training cohort. Age, preoperative CA19-9 levels, portal vein involvement, hepatic artery invasion, lymph node metastases, and surgical treatment outcomes (R0 or R1/2) were independent prognostic factors for pCCA patients in the primary cohort as suggested by the multivariate analyses and these were included in the established nomogram. The calibration curve showed good agreement between overall survival probability of pCCA patients for the nomogram predictions and the actual observations and the concordance index (C-index) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.71). The C-index values and time-dependent ROC tests suggested that the nomogram is superior to the conventional staging systems including the Bismuth-Corlette, Gazzaniga, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM 7^th edition, and Mayo Clinic. The nomogram also performed better than the traditional staging system in the internal cohort with 93 pCCA patients from the same institution and an external validation cohort including 84 pCCA patients from another institution in predicting the overall survival of the pCCA patients as suggested by the C-index values and the time-dependent ROC tests. In summary, the proposed nomogram has superior predictive accuracy of prognosis for resectable pCCA patients.

A novel classifier based on three preoperative tumor markers predicting the cancer-specific survival of gastric cancer (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4)

Several studies have highlighted the prognostic value of the individual and the various combinations of the tumor markers for gastric cancer (GC). Our study was designed to assess establish a new novel model incorporating carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4). A total of 1,566 GC patients (Primary cohort) between Jan 2000 and July 2013 were analyzed. The Primary cohort was randomly divided into Training set (n=783) and Validation set (n=783). A three-tumor marker classifier was developed in the Training set and validated in the Validation set by multivariate regression and risk-score analysis. We have identified a three-tumor marker classifier (including CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4) for the cancer specific survival (CSS) of GC (p<0.001). Consistent results were obtained in the both Training set and Validation set. Multivariate analysis showed that the classifier was an independent predictor of GC (All p value <0.001 in the Training set, Validation set and Primary cohort). Furthermore, when the leave-one-out approach was performed, the classifier showed superior predictive value to the individual or two of them (with the highest AUC (Area Under Curve); 0.618 for the Training set, and 0.625 for the Validation set), which ascertained its predictive value. Our three-tumor marker classifier is closely associated with the CSS of GC and may serve as a novel model for future decisions concerning treatments.

Blood type AB predicts promising prognosis in gastric cancer patients with positive preoperative serum CEA

Little is known about association between ABO blood groups and tumor markers in gastric cancer (GC) patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of ABO blood groups in GC patients with different levels of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).From September 2008 to April 2015, a total of 3234 GC patients who received radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics including ABO blood groups and preoperative CEA were recorded. The prognostic value of ABO blood groups within different levels of serum CEA was analyzed.Overall, the ratio of male to female patients was 3.5:1; the median age was 57.4 years (range 20-87). The median overall survival (OS) for GC patients with blood type A, B, AB, and O were 52.6, 52.8, 53.8, and 53.6 months, respectively. There was no significant difference for the survival of patients among the 4 groups (P = .736). Also, no significant difference was found among the OS of the 4 blood types with negative (P = .875) and positive (P = .131) preoperative serum CEA. Further, we found that the OS of patients with positive preoperative serum CEA and blood type AB was significantly higher than that with blood type non-AB (P = .026). For patients with positive preoperative serum CEA, multivariate analysis showed that ABO blood groups were an independent prognostic factor.Blood type AB was a favorable prognostic factor for GC patients with positive preoperative serum CEA.

Relationship of Amplification and Expression of the C-MYC Gene with Survival among Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

During the past decades, the incidence and mortality rate of stomach cancer has demonstrated a great decrease in the world, but it is still one of the most common and fatal cancers especially among men worldwide, including Iran. The MYC proto-oncogene, which is located at 8q24.1, regulates 15% of genes and is activated in 20% of all human tumors. MYC amplification and overexpression of its protein product has been reported in 15-30% of gastric neoplasias. The aim of this investigation was to find the relative efficacy of CISH (chromogenic in situ hybridization) or IHC (immunohistochemistry) in diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer, as well as the relationship of amplification and expression of C-MYC gene with patient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 102 samples of gastric cancer were collected from patients who had undergone primary surgical resection at the Cancer Institute Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, from July 2009 to March 2014. All samples were randomly selected from those who were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinomas. CISH and IHC methods were performed on all of them.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into two groups. The first consisted of stage I and II cases, and the second of stage III and IV. Survival tests for both groups was carried out with referrnce to CISH test reults. Group II (stage III and IV) with CISH+ featured lower survival than those with CISH- (p=0.233), but group I (stage I and II) patients demonstrated no significant variation with CISH+ or CISH- (p=0.630). Kaplan-Meier for both groups was carried out with IHC test findings and showed similar results. This data revealed that both diffuse and intestinal types of gastric cancer occurred significantly more in men than women. Our data also showed that CISH+ patients (43%) were more frequent in comparison with IHC+ patients (14.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

For planning treatment of gastric cancer patients, by focusing on expanding tumors, which is the greatest concern of the surgeons and patients, CISH is a better and more feasible test than IHC, in regard to sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, CISH can be used as a feasible test for tumor growth and prognosis in stage III and IV lesions. This study also indicated that C-MYC amplification in gastric cancer is correlated with survival in advanced stages.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients are both limited and controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define the clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients after curative resection.

METHODS

From May 2008 to December 2014, 198 young patients (age ≤ 40 years) and 1096 middle-aged patients (55 ≤ age ≤ 64 years) were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer in these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with middle-aged patients, the proportion of females, lower third tumors, tumor size less than 5 cm, poorly differentiated tumors and T1 tumors were significantly higher in young patients (all P < 0.05). The proportions of comorbidity, upper third tumors, well and moderately differentiated tumors, T4 tumors, and positive carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 were significantly lower in young patients (all P < 0.05). The distributions of N status and CA125 were comparable between young and middle-aged patients (all P > 0.05). The five-year overall survival rates were comparable between young patients and middle-aged patients (62.8 vs 54.7 %, P = 0.307). The tumor location, T status, N status and CA125 were independent predictors of prognosis in young patients. The overall survival of patients with tumors located in the upper or middle third was significantly lower than for those located in the lower third (60.8 vs 50.6 % vs 68.4 %, P = 0.016). The overall survival of CA125-positive patients was significantly lower than CA125-negative patients (49.0 vs 64.4 %, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The clinicopathological features were significantly different between young and middle-aged patients. The prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients was equivalent to that of middle-aged patients. Tumor location, T status, N status and CA125 were independent risk factors for prognosis in young patients.

Evaluation of the Clinical Significance of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the most commonly used tumor marker for gastrointestinal cancers but its value for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (RGA) patients in areas of high GA incidence is uncertain.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 400 subjects with RGA from the Fujian Province in China, which has a high incidence of GA. Patients had surgery between January 2010 and December 2013. CEA was measured and correlated to pathology.

RESULTS

High pretreatment serum CEA (>5 ng/mL) was associated with patient age (p = 0.000), tumor size (p = 0.008), and T and N stages (p = 0.002, p = 0.032, respectively), alpha fetoprotein (p = 0.014), and CA19-9 (p = 0.000). High CEA was significantly associated with poor overall survival. Overall survival in the whole group of patients was 63.8%, whereas it was only 42.9% in the high CEA group (p = 0.0001). Mean overall survival for high CEA patients was significantly shorter than patients with low CEA (36.5 ± 2.63 months vs. 47.4 ± 0.98 months, p = 0.000). Multivariate analysis confirmed that pretreatment serum CEA was an independent prognostic factor for increased death risk. Additionally, mean CEA in 45 high CEA patients was reduced after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment serum CEA may help to predict survival for patients with RGA in high GA incidence areas.

Long noncoding RNAs as potential biomarkers in gastric cancer: Opportunities and challenges

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major threat to human health, and its prognosis is poor due to the lack of appropriate biomarkers. LncRNAs are a group of non-protein-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the transcriptional or posttranscriptional level. LncRNAs play essential roles in GC initiation and development in the same way as oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes. Recent investigations have revealed that lncRNAs are often aberrantly expressed in GC; are involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion; and correlate with the malignant phenotype of GC. LncRNAs, especially the lncRNAs present in the blood and gastric juice, show potential value as biomarkers for the diagnosis of GC or for determining disease prognosis. However, there are still many challenges to be faced before lncRNAs can be used in clinical applications. In this review, we summarise lncRNAs as the potential biomarkers for GC and the current challenges associated with the clinical application.