Zoledronic acid prevents bone loss after liver transplantation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Increased Imminent Fracture Risk in Liver Transplant Recipients Despite Bisphosphonate Therapy

BACKGROUND

Bone loss is significant after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and is associated with increased fracture risk and decreased quality of life. In post-transplant fracture prevention, the cornerstone of therapeutic management is bisphosphonates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of 155 OLT recipients who received a bisphosphonate prescription at hospital discharge between 2012 and 2016 to investigate post-OLT fragility fracture incidence and predictive risk factors.

RESULTS

Before OLT, 14 patients presented a T score < -2.5 SD, and 23 patients (14.8%) had a history of fracture. During follow-up, the cumulative incidence of fractures on bisphosphonates (99.4% risedronate/alendronate) was 9.7% at 12 months and 13.1% at 24 months. The median time to first fragility fracture was 10 months (IQR, 3-22 months) and thus within the first 2 years of follow-up. Predictive factors of fragility fractures in multivariate Cox regression analyses included age 60 years or older (hazard ratio [HR], 2.61; 95% CI, 1.14-6.01; P = .02), post-transplant diabetes mellitus (HR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.55-9.44; P = .004), and cholestatic disease (HR, 5.93; 95% CI, 2.30-15.26; P = .0002). Additionally, the female sex was associated with a strong trend toward increased fracture risk in univariate analysis (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.00-5.15; P = .05), as well as a post-transplant absolute decrease in bone mineral density at the femoral neck and total hip (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study reports a high incidence of fractures post-OLT despite bisphosphonate therapy. Age 60 years or older, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, cholestatic disease, female sex, and femoral neck and/or total hip bone mineral density loss contribute to increased imminent fracture risk in liver transplant recipients.

Secondary Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a global public health problem, with fractures contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Although postmenopausal osteoporosis is most common, up to 30% of postmenopausal women, > 50% of premenopausal women, and between 50% and 80% of men have secondary osteoporosis. Exclusion of secondary causes is important, as treatment of such patients often commences by treating the underlying condition. These are varied but often neglected, ranging from endocrine to chronic inflammatory and genetic conditions. General screening is recommended for all patients with osteoporosis, with advanced investigations reserved for premenopausal women and men aged < 50 years, for older patients in whom classical risk factors for osteoporosis are absent, and for all patients with the lowest bone mass (Z-score ≤ -2). The response of secondary osteoporosis to conventional anti-osteoporosis therapy may be inadequate if the underlying condition is unrecognized and untreated. Bone densitometry, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, may underestimate fracture risk in some chronic diseases, including glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and may overestimate fracture risk in others (eg, Turner syndrome). FRAX and trabecular bone score may provide additional information regarding fracture risk in secondary osteoporosis, but their use is limited to adults aged ≥ 40 years and ≥ 50 years, respectively. In addition, FRAX requires adjustment in some chronic conditions, such as glucocorticoid use, type 2 diabetes, and HIV. In most conditions, evidence for antiresorptive or anabolic therapy is limited to increases in bone mass. Current osteoporosis management guidelines also neglect secondary osteoporosis and these existing evidence gaps are discussed.

Prevalence and predictors of post-liver transplantation metabolic bone diseases

Introduction

Post-liver transplantation (LTx) bone diseases have been poorly investigated. The frequency of bone diseases (osteopenia and osteoporosis) after LTx is unknown.

Aim of the study

To define prevalence and risk factors of bone disorders following LTx.

Material and methods

This prospective study was conducted on 100 consecutive adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at the National Liver Institute (NLI) and survived longer than a year. Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorption (DEXA), as well as other pre- and postoperative risk factors.

Results

The frequencies of osteopenia and osteoporosis were found to be 14% and 8% among post-LTx patients. Seven recipients of the osteoporotic group were males, with mean age, and body mass index (BMI) before and after LTx 49.5 ±7.4 years, 24.1 ±4.7 kg/m² and 22.8 ±1.5 kg/m², respectively. A significant association between hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, liver disease severity according to Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, and alcoholism with decreased post-LTx BMD was substantiated (p < 0.05, 0.006). Post-LTx development of diabetes mellitus (DM), weight gain, use of corticosteroids and basiliximab all significantly affected decreased post-LTx BMD (p < 0.05). However, binary regression revealed that post-LTx occurrence of DM (p = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] = 0.099), the severity of liver disease (p = 0.023, OR = 0.217), and HCV (p = 0.011, OR = 0.173) are the main independent predictors of metabolic bone disease (MBD) occurrence one year after LTx.

Conclusions

Post-LTx bone disorders are not infrequent complications and should be more considered in those with HCV-related severe liver disease or developed DM after LTx.

German Society of Rheumatology recommendations for management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are of substantial therapeutic importance in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, but are also associated with bone mineral density loss, osteoporosis, and fractures, especially with long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in adult patients on long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (SLR) was conducted to synthesize the evidence for GIOP prevention and treatment options. Recommendations were developed based on SLR/level of evidence and by previously defined questions and in a structured group consensus process.

RESULTS

Recommendations include supplementation with calcium and vitamin D under long-term GC therapy in adults. If specific osteologic treatment is indicated, we recommend bisphosphonates or denosumab as first-line treatment. If fracture risk is high, we recommend teriparatide as primary specific osteologic treatment. Denosumab should be used in cases of severe renal insufficiency, and specific osteologic treatment should not be given in pregnancy. For patients who have not reached the treatment goal, a switch to another class of specific osteologic drugs should be performed. We recommend re-evaluation after a treatment duration of 3-5 years or after termination of long-term GC treatment.

CONCLUSION

This work aims to provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the best possible management of GIOP in Germany and to support treatment decisions.

The Utility of Prophylactic Zoledronic Acid in Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation

Osteoporosis is prevalent among lung transplant candidates and is exacerbated post-transplant by immunosuppressive therapy. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a well-recognized surrogate for fragility fracture risk, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA) effectively reduces BMD loss and prevents fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Many groups, ours included, prophylactically treat lung transplant recipients (LTR) with bisphosphonates, but no documented consensus currently exists. Our protocol comprises ZA every 6-months from transplant wait-listing, with interval reassessment to guide ongoing treatment. We evaluate the impact of a dose of ZA within 6 months of transplantation on BMD and fracture occurrence. A retrospective analysis was performed on all adult LTR from April 2012 to October 2014, of which 60 met our inclusion criteria. LTR who received ZA within 6 months of transplantation (n = 37) were compared to those who did not (n = 23), and followed up for a minimum of three years. Outcome measures were BMD change at the lumbar spine and femur (primary), and fracture occurrence (secondary). LTR treated with ZA within 6 months of transplantation experienced a median BMD change of +8.11% at the lumbar spine and +1.39% at the femur, compared to -1.20% and -3.92%, respectively, in LTR who did not receive a ZA dose within 6 months of transplantation (p = 0.002 & p = 0.008 respectively). Our findings indicate that prophylactic ZA within 6 months of transplantation prevents BMD loss in LTR.

[German Society of Rheumatology Recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis. German version]

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are of substantial therapeutic importance in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, but are also associated with bone mineral density loss, osteoporosis, and fractures, especially with long-term use.

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in adult patients on long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (SLR) was conducted to synthesize the evidence for GIOP prevention and treatment options. Recommendations were developed based on SLR/level of evidence and by previously defined questions and in a structured group consensus process.

RESULTS

Recommendations include supplementation with calcium and vitamin D under long-term GC therapy in adults. If specific osteologic treatment is indicated, we recommend bisphosphonates or denosumab as first-line treatment. If fracture risk is high, we recommend teriparatide as primary specific osteologic treatment. Denosumab should be used in cases of severe renal insufficiency, and specific osteologic treatment should not be given in pregnancy. For patients who have not reached the treatment goal, a switch to another class of specific osteologic drugs should be performed. We recommend re-evaluation after a treatment duration of 3-5 years or after termination of long-term GC treatment.

CONCLUSION

This work aims to provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the best possible management of GIOP in Germany and to support treatment decisions.

Bisphosphonate therapy after liver transplant improves bone mineral density and reduces fracture rates: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

To investigate the efficacy of bisphosphonates and compare oral and IV formulations on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture incidence in post-orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) patients. Electronic databases were searched, and six RCTs and three cohort studies were included out of 711 articles. Main outcomes included post-OLT BMD changes, fracture incidence, and treatment adverse reactions. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted for binary and continuous outcomes, while pooled fracture incidence utilized single-arm meta-analysis. Post-OLT fracture incidence was reported in nine studies (n = 591). Total fracture incidence was 6.6% (CI: 3.4-12.4%) in bisphosphonate group and 19.1% (CI: 14.3-25.1%) in calcium and vitamin D group. Total fractures were significantly lower in patients on bisphosphonate, compared to calcium and vitamin D (n = 591; OR = 0.037; CI: 0.18-0.77; P = 0.008). Overall fractures were significantly lower in the oral group (n = 263; OR = 0.26; CI: 0.08-0.85; P = 0.02) but not in the IV group (n = 328; OR = 0.45; CI: 0.16-1.26; P = 0.129). Both oral and IV bisphosphonates are effective in reducing fracture incidence post-OLT compared to calcium and vitamin D. Oral formulations may also have an advantage over IV in reducing bone loss and fracture incidence post-OLT.

Glucocorticoid- and Transplantation-Induced Osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis; nonetheless, it remains an undertreated condition. Transplantation-induced osteoporosis encompasses a broad range of unique pathogenetic features with distinct characteristics dependent on the transplanted organ. Understanding the pathogenesis of bone loss is key to recommending osteoporosis therapy in these patients. This review summarizes recent advances and addresses current issues in these fields.

Management of Autoimmune Liver Diseases after Liver Transplantation

Autoimmune liver diseases are characterized by immune-mediated inflammation and eventual destruction of the hepatocytes and the biliary epithelial cells. They can progress to irreversible liver damage requiring liver transplantation. The post-liver transplant goals of treatment include improving the recipient’s survival, preventing liver graft-failure, and decreasing the recurrence of the disease. The keystone in post-liver transplant management for autoimmune liver diseases relies on identifying which would be the most appropriate immunosuppressive maintenance therapy. The combination of a steroid and a calcineurin inhibitor is the current immunosuppressive regimen of choice for autoimmune hepatitis. A gradual withdrawal of glucocorticoids is also recommended. On the other hand, ursodeoxycholic acid should be initiated soon after liver transplant to prevent recurrence and improve graft and patient survival in primary biliary cholangitis recipients. Unlike the previously mentioned autoimmune diseases, there are not immunosuppressive or disease-modifying agents available for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, colectomy and annual colonoscopy are key components during the post-liver transplant period.

Zoledronic acid for prevention of bone loss in patients receiving bariatric surgery

Purpose

Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity but causes substantial bone loss and increased risk of fractures. To date, there have been no studies examining whether pharmacologic treatments can prevent bone loss after bariatric surgery. We performed an exploratory study to examine the preliminary safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZOL), a potent anti-resorptive bisphosphonate, to suppress bone turnover markers (BTM) and prevent declines in bone mineral density (BMD) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

Methods

We performed an open-label pilot study of pre-operative ZOL in postmenopausal women with obesity who were planning RYGB (n = 4). A single dose of zoledronic acid 5 mg was given intravenously prior to RYGB. Serum bone biochemistries including C-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were measured at multiple timepoints throughout the 24-week study. BMD was also obtained at the spine and hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and at the trabecular spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at pre-operative baseline and 24 weeks. Results were compared against pre-operative baseline and against changes among RYGB historical controls (n = 10).

Results

At 2 weeks after RYGB, there was a nonsignificant trend for CTX and P1NP levels to be lower than baseline levels in the ZOL group. By 24 weeks after RYGB, however, participants who received ZOL had a significant increase in CTX above pre-operative baseline (+0.228 ± 0.117 ng/dL, p = 0.030) but this CTX rise was less than that observed in the controls (+0.601 ± 0.307 ng/dL, p = 0.042 between groups). Despite ZOL use, participants had significant areal BMD loss at the total hip as compared to pre-operative baseline (-4.2 ± 1.5%, p = 0.012) that was similar in magnitude to total hip BMD loss in the controls (-5.5 ± 3.9%, p = 0.005). There was a suggestion that the ZOL group might be protected against trabecular spine volumetric bone loss as compared to the control group (+4.8 ± 8.0% vs. -5.9 ± 7.0%, p = 0.075 between groups). Serum calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and parathyroid hormone did not change in either group. No hypocalcemia or serious adverse events were reported after ZOL.

Conclusion

In this proof of concept study, a single dose of ZOL prior to RYGB appeared to transiently mitigate but not fully prevent high bone turnover in the acute postoperative period. At 24 weeks after RYGB, our preliminary data suggest that ZOL was not sufficient to prevent bone loss at the hip, although it may preserve bone density at the trabecular spine. Further prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify the best strategies for preventing bone loss in bariatric patients receiving RYGB.

Cystic fibrosis bone disease treatment: Current knowledge and future directions

Bone disease is a frequent complication in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Early detection and monitoring of bone mineral density and multidisciplinary preventive care are necessary from childhood through adolescence to minimize CF-related bone disease (CFBD) in adult CF patients. Approaches to optimizing bone health include ensuring adequate nutrition, particularly intake of calcium and vitamins D and K, addressing other secondary causes of low bone density such as hypogonadism, encouraging weight bearing exercise, and avoiding bone toxic medications. Of the currently available anti-resorptive or anabolic osteoporosis medications, only bisphosphonates have been studied in individuals with CF. Future studies are needed to better understand the optimal approach for managing CFBD.

Effects of bisphosphonates on osteoporosis: Focus on zoledronate

Osteoporosis is a bone disease that mainly affects older people and postmenopausal women. Lack of proper treatment for this disease gives rise to many problems in patients and occasionally leads to death. Many drugs have been utilized to treat osteoporosis but the most effective one is the bisphosphonates (BPs) family. This family has several positive effects on bone tissue, including promoting bone healing, enhancing bone mineral density, reducing bone resorption, preventing pathologic fractures, suppressing bone turnover, and modulating bone remodeling. On the other hand, there have also been inconclusive reports that BPs might have a desirable or even adverse impact on osteoporotic patients. Therefore, we set out to examine the positive and negative effects of this family, with a focus on the most potent one that is zoledronate (Zol), in clinical usage. Zoledronate is an amino-BPs and nitrogen-containing drug which is the most powerful BPs on osteoporosis treatment or prevention. Many studies showed its effectiveness in the treatment of osteoporosis and bone healing. As Zol enjoys a considerable potential in treating and preventing osteoporosis, it can be used as one of the effective treatments in this field.

Bone Health in Patients With Liver Diseases

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disease in chronic liver disease (CLD) resulting in frequent fractures and leading to significant morbidity in this population. In addition to patients with cirrhosis and chronic cholestasis, patients with CLD from other etiologies may be affected in the absence of cirrhosis. The mechanism of osteoporosis in CLD varies according to etiology, but in cirrhosis and cholestatic liver disease it is driven primarily by decreased bone formation, which differs from the increased bone resorption seen in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Direct toxic effects from iron and alcohol play a role in hemochromatosis and alcoholic liver disease, respectively. Chronic inflammation also has been proposed to mediate bone disease in viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Treatment trials specific to osteoporosis in CLD are small, confined to primary biliary cholangitis and post-transplant patients, and have not consistently demonstrated a benefit in this population. As it stands, prevention of osteoporosis in CLD relies on the mitigation of risk factors such as smoking and alcohol use, treatment of underlying hypogonadism, and encouraging a healthy diet and weight-bearing exercise. The primary medical intervention for the treatment of osteoporosis in CLD remains bisphosphonates though a benefit in terms of fracture reduction has never been shown. This review outlines what is known regarding the pathogenesis of bone disease in CLD and summarizes current and emerging therapies.

Comparative assessment of sarcopenia using the JSH, AWGS, and EWGSOP2 criteria and the relationship between sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia and osteoporosis reduce life quality and worsen prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). When these two complications coexist, a diagnosis of osteosarcopenia is made. We aimed to investigate the actual situations of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, osteosarcopenia, and vertebral fracture, and to clarify the relationship among these events in patients with LC.

METHODS

We describe a cross-sectional study of 142 patients with LC. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) criteria, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria, and European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) criteria. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and handgrip strength were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis and a digital grip strength dynamometer, respectively. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and vertebral fracture was evaluated using spinal lateral X-rays. The severity of LC was assessed using the Child-Pugh classification.

RESULTS

Among the 142 patients, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 33.8% (48/142) according to the JSH and AWGS criteria and 28.2% (40/142) according to the EWGSOP2 criteria. The number of patients with osteoporosis, osteosarcopenia, and vertebral fracture was 49 (34.5%), 31 (21.8%), and 41 (28.9%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a close association between sarcopenia and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was independently associated with sarcopenia [odds ratio (OR) = 3.923, P = 0.010]. Conversely, sarcopenia was independently associated with osteoporosis (OR = 5.722, P < 0.001). Vertebral fracture occurred most frequently in patients with osteosarcopenia (19/31; 61.3%) and least frequently in those without both sarcopenia and osteoporosis (12/76; 15.8%). The SMI and handgrip strength values were significantly correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine (r = 0.55 and 0.51, respectively; P < 0.001 for both), femoral neck, (r = 0.67 and 0.62, respectively; P < 0.001 for both), and total hip (r = 0.67 and 0.61, respectively; P < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, osteoporosis, osteosarcopenia, and vertebral fracture were highly prevalent and closely associated with one another in patients with LC. Specifically, patients with osteosarcopenia had the highest risk of vertebral fractures. Early diagnosis of these complications is essential for treatment intervention.

Bone disease following solid organ transplantation: A narrative review and recommendations for management from The European Calcified Tissue Society

INTRODUCTION

Solid organ transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage organ failure. Both pre-transplantation bone disease and immunosuppressive regimens result in rapid bone loss and increased fracture rates.

METHODS

The European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) formed a working group to perform a systematic review of existing literature on the consequences of end-stage kidney, liver, heart, and lung disease on bone health. Moreover, we assessed the characteristics of post-transplant bone disease and the skeletal effects of immunosuppressive agents and aimed to provide recommendations for the prevention and treatment of transplantation-related osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Characteristics of bone disease may differ depending on the organ that fails, but patients awaiting solid organ transplantation frequently depict a wide spectrum of bone and mineral abnormalities. Common features are a decreased bone mass and impaired bone strength with consequent high fracture risk, all of which are aggravated in the early post-transplantation period.

CONCLUSION

Both the underlying disease leading to end-stage organ failure and the immunosuppression regimens implemented after successful organ transplantation have detrimental effects on bone mass, quality and strength. Given existing ample data confirming the high frequency of bone disease in patients awaiting solid organ transplantation, we recommend that all transplant candidates should be assessed for osteoporosis and fracture risk and, if indicated, treated before and after transplantation. Since bone loss in the early post-transplantation period occurs in virtually all solid organ recipients and is associated with glucocorticoid administration, the goal should be to use the lowest possible dose and to taper and withdraw glucocorticoids as early as possible.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease

A frequent complication in liver cirrhosis is malnutrition, which is associated with the progression of liver failure, and with a higher rate of complications including infections, hepatic encephalopathy and ascites. In recent years, the rising prevalence of obesity has led to an increase in the number of cirrhosis cases related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Malnutrition, obesity and sarcopenic obesity may worsen the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and lower their survival. Nutritional monitoring and intervention is therefore crucial in chronic liver disease. These Clinical Practice Guidelines review the present knowledge in the field of nutrition in chronic liver disease and promote further research on this topic. Screening, assessment and principles of nutritional management are examined, with recommendations provided in specific settings such as hepatic encephalopathy, cirrhotic patients with bone disease, patients undergoing liver surgery or transplantation and critically ill cirrhotic patients.

Acute hypocalcaemia following denosumab in heart and lung transplant patients with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in the heart and lung transplant population. Given high rates of concurrent renal impairment, there is increasing use of denosumab in this population. However, denosumab may be associated with hypocalcaemia, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

AIM

To explore the risk of hypocalcaemia in a heart and lung transplant cohort prescribed denosumab for osteoporosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective database review of all surviving heart and lung transplant patients who had received denosumab for osteoporosis between January 2012 and November 2015. We assessed the rates of hypocalcaemia in this cohort and collected baseline clinical data to determine associated factors.

RESULTS

Ten patients received denosumab and had laboratory results available within 3 months of the dose. Of these, three patients developed severe (grade 4) hypocalcaemia, while two patients developed mild (grade 1) hypocalcaemia. In comparison to the five patients who remained normocalcaemic, patients with hypocalcaemia had significantly lower baseline mean estimated glomerular filtration rate but similar baseline mean corrected serum calcium. Unexpectedly, patients developing hypocalcaemia had non-significantly higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and lower baseline doses of prednisone.

CONCLUSIONS

In heart and lung transplant patients, denosumab should be used judiciously in patients with advanced renal disease due to the risk of hypocalcaemia.

Low bone density and fractures before and after pediatric lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Children undergoing lung transplant are at risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. The effect of lung transplantation on bone health in pediatric patients is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients ages 2-21 years who underwent lung transplantation at our hospital from January 2000 to January 2015.

RESULTS

51 patients were studied. At the time of transplant evaluation, BMD Z-score was -2.2 ± 1.4, and 59% of patients had low BMD. BMD Z-score declined in the first year after treatment and returned to near-baseline by the third post-transplant year. Fractures occurred in 9 patients (18%) before and 15 patients (29%) after transplant. Bisphosphonate use was associated with improvement in BMD Z-score and lower mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients had a high prevalence of low BMD at the time of lung transplant evaluation. BMD Z-scores declined in the year after transplant and returned to the pre-transplant level by the third post-transplant year while remaining below normal levels. Fractures were common at sites associated with significant morbidity. These findings support efforts to optimize bone health before and after pediatric lung transplantation, and future studies are needed to evaluate the role of bisphosphonates in these patients.

Osteoporosis in chronic liver disease

Osteoporosis is a frequent complication in patients with chronic liver disease, especially in end-stages and in chronic cholestasis, in addition to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, haemochromatosis and alcoholism. Mechanisms underlying osteoporosis are poorly understood, but osteoporosis mainly results from low bone formation. In this setting, sclerostin, a key regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway which regulates bone formation, in addition to the effects of the retained substances of cholestasis such as bilirubin and bile acids on osteoblastic cells, may influence the decreased bone formation in chronic cholestasis. Similarly, the damaging effects of iron and alcohol on osteoblastic cells may partially explain bone disease in haemochromatosis and alcoholism. A role for proinflammatory cytokines has been proposed in different conditions. Increased bone resorption may occur in cholestatic women with advanced disease. Low vitamin D, poor nutrition and hypogonadism, may be contributing factors to the full picture of bone disorders in chronic liver disease.

Testosterone therapy increases muscle mass in men with cirrhosis and low testosterone: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Low testosterone and sarcopenia are common in men with cirrhosis and both are associated with increased mortality. Whether testosterone therapy in cirrhosis improves muscle mass and other outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a 12-month, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intramuscular testosterone undecanoate in 101 men with established cirrhosis and low serum testosterone (total testosterone <12nmol/L or free testosterone <230pmol/L) in a single tertiary centre. Body composition was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline, 6 and 12months.

RESULTS

At study completion, appendicular lean mass was significant higher in testosterone-treated subjects, with a mean adjusted difference (MAD) of +1.69kg, (CI +0.40; +2.97kg, p=0.021). Secondary outcomes included a substantially higher total lean mass in the active group (MAD +4.74kg, CI +1.75; +7.74kg, p=0.008), matched by reduced fat mass (MAD -4.34kg, CI -6.65; -2.04, p<0.001). Total bone mass increased (MAD +0.08kg, CI +0.01; +0.15kg, p=0.009) as did bone mineral density at the femoral neck (MAD +0.287points, CI +0.140; +0.434, p<0.001). Haemoglobin was higher with testosterone therapy (MAD +10.2g/L, CI +1.50; +18.9g/L, p=0.041) and percentage glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) lower (MAD -0.35%, CI -0.05; -0.54, p=0.028). Mortality was non-significantly lower in testosterone-treated patients (16% vs. 25.5%, p=0.352). There was no increase in adverse events in testosterone-treated subjects.

CONCLUSION

Testosterone therapy in men with cirrhosis and low serum testosterone safely increases muscle mass, bone mass and haemoglobin, and reduces fat mass and HbA1c. This is the first evidence-based therapy for sarcopenia in cirrhosis and thus requires larger-scale investigation into its potential impact on mortality.

LAY SUMMARY

Both low testosterone and muscle wasting are associated with increased risk of death in men with severe liver disease. Administering testosterone to men with liver disease who have low testosterone levels significantly increases their muscle mass. In addition, testosterone has non-muscle beneficial effects which may be able to increase survival in this population.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry trial number ACTRN 12614000526673.

Long-term leukopenia in a lung transplanted patient with cystic fibrosis treated with zoledronic acid: a case report

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a serious autosomal recessive genetic disorder associated with chronic lung disease, malabsorption, malnutrition, pancreatic insufficiency and premature respiratory failure. Recent advances in medical science and technology have increased the lifespan of patients with CF, albeit with long-term consequences of the disease, such as osteoporosis, becoming of increasing significance. The medical treatment of osteoporosis in patients with CF or after organ transplantation is still being explored, and no clear guidelines regarding the best choice of bisphosphonate exist. We report a case of a young woman with CF, lung transplantation and low bone mass developing long-term leukopenia after treatment with zoledronic acid. The leukopenia, with a strong affection of the neutrocytes, lasted for 4 months and the condition only went into remission after granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment. It is important to be aware of symptomatic leukopenia in immunosuppressive patients after treatment with zoledronic acid.

Bone health and vitamin D status in alcoholic liver disease

Alcohol consumption is harmful to many organs and tissues, including bones, and it leads to osteoporosis. Hepatic osteodystrophy is abnormal bone metabolism that has been defined in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), including osteopenia, osteoporosis, and osteomalacia. Decreased bone density in patients with CLD results from decreased bone formation or increased bone resorption. The prevalence of osteopenia in alcoholic liver disease (ALD) patients is between 34 % and 48 %, and the prevalence of osteoporosis is between 11 % and 36 %. Cirrhosis is also a risk factor for osteoporosis. The liver has an important role in vitamin D metabolism. Ninety percent of patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis have vitamin D inadequacy (<80 nmol/L). The lowest serum vitamin D levels were observed in patients with Child-Pugh class C. Bone densitometry is used for the definitive diagnosis of osteoporosis in ALD. There are no specific controlled clinical studies on the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with ALD. Alcohol cessation and abstinence are principal for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in ALD patients, and the progression of osteopenia can be stopped in this way. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation is recommended, and associated nutritional deficiencies should also be corrected. The treatment recommendations of osteoporosis in CLD tend to be extended to ALD. Bisphosphonates have been proven to be effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in chronic cholestatic disease and post-transplant patients, and they can be used in ALD patients. Randomized studies assessing the management of CLD-associated osteoporosis and the development of new drugs for osteoporosis may change the future. Here, we will discuss bone quality, vitamin D status, mechanism of bone effects, and diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in ALD.

Liver transplantation in Australia and New Zealand

Liver transplantation (LT) in Australia and New Zealand began in 1985. Over this time until December 2014, LT took place in 3700 adults and 800 children. LT is regulated with 1 unit, supported by the government, per state or region. Currently approximately 270 transplants take place per year. Organ donation rates are moderate in Australia (17 per 1 million of population) but very low in New Zealand (11 per 1 million of population). All the units share organ donors for fulminant hepatic failure cases (status 1). Recipient listing criteria and organ allocation criteria are commonly agreed to via National and Trans-Tasman agreements, which are published online. Current survival rates indicate approximately 94% 1-year survival with median survival in adults of approximately 20 years, whereas 75% of children are alive at 20 years. All units collaborate in research projects via the Australia and New Zealand Liver Transplant Registry and have published highly cited articles particularly on the prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence. Outcomes for indigenous populations have also been analyzed. In conclusion, LT in Australia and New Zealand is well developed with transparent processes related to criteria for listing and organ allocation together with publication of outcomes. Liver Transplantation 22 830-838 2016 AASLD.

Osteoporosis in the adult solid organ transplant population: underlying mechanisms and available treatment options

The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis is an increasingly important topic in the solid organ transplant (SOT) population. Compared to the general population, these patients are at an elevated risk of developing osteoporosis due to progressive disease, lifelong immunosuppressant therapy, and malnutrition. As patients live longer after transplant, chronic disease management is increasingly more important. Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is often necessary in the SOT population due to a high incidence of vitamin D deficiency. Bisphosphonate therapy is most commonly used for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, but therapy can be limited by renal dysfunction which is common in transplant recipients. Alternative agents such as teriparatide and calcitonin have not been shown to provide a significant impact on the rate of fractures in this population. Additionally, denosumab may be a promising treatment option due to its novel mechanism of action, and is currently being studied in renal transplant patients. Timely initiation of supplementation and treatment, and minimizing glucocorticoid exposure prior to and after transplantation will aid in the prevention and proper management of osteoporosis in these patients.

Brazilian society of hepatology recommendations for the diagnosis and management of autoimmune diseases of the liver

ABSTRACT In order to draw evidence-based recommendations concerning the management of autoimmune diseases of the liver, the Brazilian Society of Hepatology has sponsored a single-topic meeting in October 18th, 2014 at São Paulo. An organizing committee comprised of seven investigators was previously elected by the Governing Board to organize the scientific agenda as well as to select twenty panelists to make a systematic review of the literature and to present topics related to the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and their overlap syndromes. After the meeting, all panelists gathered together for the discussion of the topics and the elaboration of those recommendations. The text was subsequently submitted for suggestions and approval of all members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology through its homepage. The present paper is the final version of the reviewed manuscript organized in topics, followed by the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology.

Effect of zoledronic acid on serum calcium in Paget's disease patients after educational strategies to improve calcium and vitamin D supplementation

OBJECTIVE

Bisphosphonates are the most effective therapeutic agents in patients with Paget's disease of bone. As a result of their inhibition of osteoclastic activity, hypocalcemia of variable frequency and severity following intravenous bisphosphonate therapy has been reported. The present study assessed the effect of physician and patient education on adequate supplementation of calcium and vitamin D to reduce the potential risk of developing hypocalcemia following infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicenter, controlled registry trial in which patients with Paget's disease were treated with a single intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid. Physicians were provided with educational materials focusing on optimization of calcium and vitamin D supplementation following zoledronic infusion that they used to educate their patients. The primary safety variable was the percentage of patients with serum calcium level <2.07mmol/l 9-11 days after zoledronic acid infusion.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients were evaluable in the post dose hypocalcemia safety analysis. Of these, only 1 patient had treatment-emergent hypocalcemia, with a serum calcium level of 1.92 mmol/l 4 days following therapy. Hypocalcemia-related symptoms were not reported in this patient and the serum calcium returned to normal range at 2.17 mmol/l within 1 week on oral calcium supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that, with optimization of calcium and vitamin D supplementation by physician and patient education, hypocalcemia is an infrequent occurrence following zoledronic acid infusion.

Current and future treatments of secondary osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is commonly associated with menopause and ageing. It can, however, also be caused by diseases, lifestyle, genetic diseases, drug therapies and other therapeutic interventions. In cases of secondary osteoporosis, a common rule is the management of the underlying condition. Healthy habits and calcium and vitamin D supplementation are also generally advised. In cases of high risk of fracture, specific antiosteoporosis medications should be prescribed. For most conditions, the available evidence is limited. Special attention should be paid to possible contraindications of drugs used for the treatment of postmenopausal or senile osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are the most widely used drugs in secondary osteoporosis, and denosumab or teriparatide have been also assessed in some cases. Important research is needed to develop more tailored strategies, specific to the peculiarities of the different types of secondary osteoporosis.

Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: a Review Featuring a Women's Health Perspective

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are two major types of chronic cholestatic liver disease. Each disorder has distinguishing features and variable progression, but both may ultimately result in cirrhosis and hepatic failure. The following offers a review of PBC and PSC, beginning with a general overview of disease etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical features, natural course, and treatment. In addition to commonly associated manifestations of fatigue, pruritus, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, select disease-related topics pertaining to women's health are discussed including metabolic bone disease, hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular risk, and pregnancy-related issues influencing maternal disease course and birth outcomes. This comprehensive review of PBC and PSC highlights some unique clinical considerations in the care of female patients with cholestatic liver disease.

Bone disease after transplantation: osteoporosis and fractures risk

Organ transplantation is the gold standard therapy for several end-stage diseases. Bone loss is a common complication that occurs in transplant recipients. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are serious complication, mainly in the first year post transplantation. Many factors contribute to the pathogenesis of bone disease following organ transplantation. This review address the mechanisms of bone loss including the contribution of the immunosuppressive agents as well as the specific features to bone loss after kidney, lung, liver, cardiac and bone marrow transplantation. Prevention and management of bone loss in the transplant recipient should be included in their post transplant follow-up in order to prevent fractures.

CCL5 secreted from bone marrow stromal cells stimulates the migration and invasion of Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells via the PI3K-Akt pathway

Bone metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) seem to be increasing. Previous studies showed that soluble factors secreted by host cells and direct cell-to-cell interactions contributed to the preferential metastasis and growth of cancer cells in bone, while the underlying mechanism(s) of the metastasis of HCC in the bone are poorly understood. Here, we determined the effect of HS-5 cells on Huh7 cell proliferation, and investigated the role of CCL5 from HS-5 cells on the development of Huh7 cells. In addition, the underlying mechanisms on the influence in Huh7 cells were investigated. Our results showed that HS-5 cells could promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of Huh7 cells, and inhibited apoptosis. CCL5 downregulation was able to inhibit the effects of HS-5 cells on Huh7 cell migration and invasion via the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and reduce MMP-2 expression. Therefore, these findings suggest that CCL5 secreted from MSCs can promote the migration and invasion of Huh7 cells and could be an important factor in HCC related to occurrence of bone metastases.

Bone density in heart or lung transplant recipients--a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is prevalent among heart or lung transplant (HLT) candidates. Bone loss is common posttransplant, with an associated increase in fracture risk. There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal management of bone health in HLT recipients. We report bone health data in a cohort of HLT recipients before and after transplantation and make recommendations for management.

METHODS

Patients over the age of 20 who had a heart or lung transplant between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the New Zealand HLT Service database, and demographic data, immunosuppressive regimens, bisphosphonate use, and serial bone mineral density (BMD) data were extracted.

RESULTS

Pretransplant BMD was available in 52 heart and 72 lung transplant recipients; 30 and 42, respectively, also had posttransplant BMD data. Pretransplant osteopenia or osteoporosis prevalence were 23% and 8% for heart candidates and 36% and 31% for lung candidates. Posttransplant, BMD decreased significantly at the femoral neck but not at the lumbar spine in the first year, with subsequent stabilization particularly in the presence of bisphosphonate use. Pretransplant BMD was the major predictor for developing osteopenia or osteoporosis after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of HLT recipients have osteopenia or osteoporosis pretransplant, and this persists posttransplant. Pretransplant BMD is an important predictor of subsequent osteopenia or osteoporosis development, allowing risk stratification and targeted intervention.

Osteoporosis in chronic liver disease

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal complication seen in patients with chronic liver disease. Osteoporosis is usually asymptomatic and, if untreated, can result in fractures and impaired quality of life. For this review, we performed a systematic search of the PubMed database, and all recent peer-reviewed articles regarding the prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in chronic liver disease were included. The prevalence of osteoporosis varies between 11% and 58% in patients with chronic liver disease and in transplant recipients. The etiology of osteoporosis is multifactorial and only partially understood. Various factors linked to the pathogenesis of bone loss are vitamin D, calcium, insulin growth factor-1, receptor activation of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), bilirubin, fibronectin, leptin, proinflammatory cytokines, and genetic polymorphisms. Management of osteoporosis involves early diagnosis, identifying and minimizing risk factors, general supportive care, nutrition therapy, and pharmacotherapy. Osteoporosis is diagnosed based on the bone mineral density (BMD) assessment using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. Measurement of BMD should be considered in all patients with advanced liver disease and in transplant recipients. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation is recommended for all patients with osteoporosis. Specific agents used for treatment of osteoporosis include bisphosphonates, calcitonin, hormonal therapy, and raloxifene. Bisphosphonates have become the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Prolonged suppression of bone remodeling resulting in atypical fractures has emerged as a significant complication with long-term use of bisphosphonates. Newer treatment agents and better fracture prevention strategies are necessary to prevent and treat osteoporosis.

Zoledronic acid versus alendronate for the prevention of bone loss after heart or liver transplantation

CONTEXT

The first year after transplantation is characterized by rapid bone loss.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare zoledronic acid (zoledronate) and alendronate for prevention of transplantation bone loss.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A randomized clinical trial was conducted at a transplantation center.

PATIENTS

The study included 84 adults undergoing heart or liver transplantation and a concurrently transplanted, nonrandomized reference group of 27 adults with T scores greater than -1.5.

INTERVENTIONS

Alendronate (70 mg weekly for 12 months) or one 5-mg infusion of zoledronate were both initiated 26 ± 8 d after transplantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was total hip bone mineral density (BMD) 1 yr after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD and serum C-telopeptide, a bone resorption marker.

RESULTS

In the reference group, BMD declined at the spine and hip (P < 0.001). In the randomized groups, hip BMD remained stable. Spine BMD increased in the zoledronate group and did not change in the alendronate group; at 12 months, the 2.2% difference between groups (95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 3.9%; P = 0.009) favored zoledronate. In heart transplant patients, spine BMD declined in the alendronate and increased in the zoledronate group (-3.0 vs. +1.6%, respectively; between-group difference, 4.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 6.3%; P < 0.001). In liver transplant patients, spine BMD increased comparably in both groups. Twelve-month C-telopeptide was lower in the zoledronate group than in the alendronate group (79 vs. 49%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

One 5-mg infusion of zoledronate and weekly alendronate prevent bone loss at the hip and, in liver transplant patients, increase spine BMD. In heart transplant patients, spine bone BMD remained stable with zoledronate but decreased with alendronate.

Bone disease in organ transplant patients: pathogenesis and management

Bone disease is common in recipients of kidney, heart, lung, liver, and bone marrow transplants, and causes debilitating complications, such as osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, bone pain, and fractures. The frequency of fractures ranges from 6% to 45% for kidney transplant recipients to 22% to 42% for heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients. Bone disease in transplant patients is the sum of complex mechanisms that involve both preexisting bone disease before transplant and post-transplant bone loss due to the effects of immunosuppressive medications. Evaluation of bone disease should preferably start before the transplant or in the early post-transplant period and include assessment of bone mineral density and other metabolic factors that influence bone health. This requires close coordination between the primary care physician and transplant team. Patients should be stratified based on their fracture risk. Prevention and treatment include risk factor reduction, antiresorptive medications, such as bisphosphonates and calcitonin, calcitriol, and/or gonadal hormone replacement. A steroid-avoidance protocol may be considered.

Treatment of osteoporosis in patients with chronic liver disease and in liver transplant recipients

The pathogenesis of osteoporosis in chronic liver disease and post-liver transplantation is complex and heterogeneous. The development of hepatic osteodystrophy may be related to both increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation. Available medical treatments can be broadly classified into antiresorptive and bone-stimulating agents. Most published studies on the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with liver disease have used the commonly prescribed antiosteoporosis drugs approved for postmenopausal osteoporosis. These studies have included a small number of subjects and used bone mineral density (BMD) changes rather than fracture occurrence as an endpoint because of the short follow-up. Although the increases in BMD are promising, no intervention is proven to have antifracture efficacy in hepatic osteodystrophy. The natural history of bone disease following liver transplantation has not been fully investigated, although studies suggest that bone mineral loss is transient and generally reverses within a year following transplantation. The approach to treatment in liver transplant recipients should be targeted at preventing the early bone loss without interfering with the later recovery. Based on the available data, no single available agent can be considered as first-line therapy. In our opinion, the best treatment approach involves the elucidation of modifiable risk factors and the selection of agents targeted at the underlying derangements.

Nutritional interventions for liver-transplanted patients

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is a common problem for patients waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation and a risk factor for post-transplant morbidity. The decision to initiate enteral or parenteral nutrition, to which patients and at which time, is still debated. The effects of nutritional supplements given before or after liver transplantation, or both, still remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition as well as oral nutritional supplements administered to patients before and after liver transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (March 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2 of 12, 2012) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (January 1946 to March 2012), EMBASE (January 1974 to March 2012), Science Citation Index Expanded (January 1900 to March 2012), Social Science Citation Index (January 1961 to October 2010), and reference lists of articles. Manufacturers and experts in the field have also been contacted and relevant journals and conference proceedings were handsearched (from 1997 to October 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials of parallel or cross-over design evaluating the beneficial or harmful effects of enteral or parenteral nutrition or oral nutritional supplements for patients before and after liver transplantation were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of the trials and extracted data. Dichotomous data were reported as odds ratios (OR) and continuous data as mean differences (MD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analysis was not possible due to clinical heterogeneity of included interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. Four publications did not report outcomes pre-defined in the review protocol, or other clinically relevant outcomes and additional data could not be obtained. Nine trials could provide data for the review. Most of the 13 included trials were small and at high risk of bias. Meta-analyses were not possible due to clinical heterogeneity of the interventions.No interventions that were likely to be beneficial were identified.For interventions of unknown effectiveness,postoperative enteral nutrition compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition seemed to have no beneficial or harmful effects on clinical outcomes. Parenteral nutrition containing protein, fat, carbohydrates, and branched-chain amino acids with or without alanyl-glutamine seemed to have no beneficial effect on the outcomes of one and three years survival when compared with a solution of 5% dextrose and normal saline. Enteral immunonutrition with Supportan® seemed to have no effect on occurrence of immunological rejection when compared with enteral nutrition with Fresubin®.There is weak evidence that, compared with standard dietary advice, adding a nutritional supplement to usual diet for patients during the waiting time for liver transplantation had an effect on clinical outcomes after liver transplantation. The combination of enteral nutrition plus parenteral nutrition plus glutamine-dipeptide seemed to be beneficial in reducing length of hospital stay after liver transplantation compared with standard parenteral nutrition (mean difference (MD) -12.20 days; 95% CI -20.20 to -4.00). There is weak evidence that the use of parenteral nutrition plus branched-chain amino acids had an effect on clinical outcomes compared with standard parenteral nutrition, but each was beneficial in reducing length of stay in intensive care unit compared to a standard glucose solution (MD -2.40; 95% CI -4.29 to -0.51 and MD -2.20 days; 95% CI -3.79 to -0.61). There is weak evidence that adding omega-3 fish oil to parenteral nutrition reduced the length of hospital stay after liver transplantation (mean difference -7.1 days; 95% CI -13.02 to -1.18) and the length of stay in intensive care unit after liver transplantation (MD -1.9 days; 95% CI -1.9 to -0.22).For interventions unlikely to be beneficial, there is a significant increased risk in acute rejections in malnourished patients with a history of encephalopathy and treated with the nutritional supplement Ensure® compared with usual diet only (MD 0.70 events per patient; 95% CI 0.08 to 1.32).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to identify nutritional interventions for liver transplanted patients that seemed to offer convincing benefits. Further randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias and powerful sample sizes are needed.

Long-term outcome after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, and liver tumors. Over the past 4 decades, improvements in surgical techniques, peritransplant intensive care, and immunosuppressive regimens have resulted in significant improvements in short-term survival. Focus has now shifted to addressing long-term complications and improving quality of life in liver recipients. These include adverse effects of immunosuppression; recurrence of the primary liver disease; and management of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, osteoporosis, and de novo malignancy. Issues such as posttransplant depression, employment, sexual function, fertility, and pregnancy must not be overlooked, as they have a direct impact on the liver recipient's quality of life. This review summarizes the latest data in long-term outcome after liver transplantation.

Patients with cirrhosis and ascites have false values of bone density: implications for the diagnosis of osteoporosis

The effect of ascites on bone densitometry has been assessed in 25 patients with advanced cirrhosis, and it was concluded that ascites over 4 l causes inaccuracy of BMD measurements, particularly at the lumbar spine. This fact must be considered when assessing bone mass in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the best procedure for assessment of osteoporosis and fracture risk, but BMD values at the central skeleton may be influenced by changes in soft tissues. Therefore, we have studied the effect of ascites on BMD.

METHODS

BMD was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip, just before and shortly after therapeutic paracentesis in 25 patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. Changes in BMD, lean and fat mass, abdominal diameter and weight, as well as the amount of removed ascites were measured.

RESULTS

The amount of drained ascites was 6.6 ± 0.5 l (range: 3.0 to 12.7 l). After paracentesis, BMD increased at the lumbar spine (from 0.944 ± 0.035 to 0.997 ± 0.038 g/cm(2), p < 0.001) and at the total hip (from 0.913 ± 0.036 to 0.926 ± 0.036 g/cm(2), p < 0.01). Patients with a volume of drained ascites higher than 4 l showed a significant increase in lumbar BMD (7.0%), compared with patients with a lower amount (1.5%) (p < 0.03). The decrease in total soft tissue mass correlated with the amount of removed ascites (r = 0.951, p < 0.001). Diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia changed after paracentesis in 12% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Ascites over 4 l causes inaccuracy of BMD measurements, particularly at the lumbar spine. This fact must be considered when assessing bone mass in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Osteoporosis after transplantation

Transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage diseases of kidney, lung, liver, and heart among others. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are serious complications of organ transplantation, particularly in the first post-transplant year. Many factors contribute to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis following organ transplantation. This review addresses the mechanisms of bone loss that occurs both in the early and late post-transplant periods, including the contribution of the immunosuppressive agents as well as the specific features to bone loss after kidney, lung, liver, cardiac, and bone marrow transplantation. Prevention and treatment for osteoporosis in the transplant recipient are also discussed.

Hepatic osteodystrophy: An important matter for consideration in chronic liver disease

Hepatic osteodystrophy (HO) is the generic term defining the group of alterations in bone mineral metabolism found in patients with chronic liver disease. This paper is a global review of HO and its main pathophysiological, epidemiological and therapeutic aspects. Studies examining the most relevant information concerning the prevalence, etiological factors, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects involved in HO were identified by a systematic literature search of the PubMed database. HO generically defines overall alterations in bone mineral density (BMD) (osteoporosis or osteopenia) which appear as a possible complication of chronic liver disease. The origin of HO is multifactorial and its etiology and severity vary in accordance with the underlying liver disease. Its exact prevalence is unknown, but different studies estimate that it could affect from 20% to 50% of patients. The reported mean prevalence of osteoporosis ranges from 13%-60% in chronic cholestasis to 20% in chronic viral hepatitis and 55% in viral cirrhosis. Alcoholic liver disease is not always related to osteopenia. HO has been commonly studied in chronic cholestatic disease (primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis). Several risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms have been associated with the loss of BMD in patients with chronic liver disease. However, little information has been discovered in relationship to most of these mechanisms. Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis is recommended in advanced chronic liver disease. There is a lack of randomized studies assessing specific management for HO.

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are widely used for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis often have osteoporosis - either postmenopausal or secondary to the liver disease. No systematic review or meta-analysis has assessed the effects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and full text searches were conducted until November 2011. Manufacturers and authors were contacted for additional studies during the conductance of the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials of bisphosphonates in primary biliary cirrhosis compared with placebo or no intervention, or another bisphosphonate, or any other drug.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data. RevMan Analysis was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) or risk difference (RD) and of continuous data with mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components were used to assess risk of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was also used to control for random errors (play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials were included. Three trials with 106 participants, of which two trials with high risk of bias, did not demonstrate significant effects of bisphosphonates (etidronate or alendronate) versus placebo or no intervention regarding mortality (RD 0.00; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.12, I² = 0%), fractures (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.29 to 2.66, I² = 0%), or adverse events (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.04). Two trials with 62 participants with high risk of bias compared one bisphosphonate (etidronate or alendronate) versus another (alendronate or ibandronate) and found no significant difference regarding mortality (RD -0.03; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.07, I² = 0%), fractures (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.18 to 5.06, I² = 0%), or adverse events (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.04, I² = 0%). Bisphosphonates had no significant effect on liver-related mortality, liver transplantation, or liver-related morbidity compared with placebo or no intervention, or another bisphosphonate. Bisphosphonates had no significant effect on bone mineral density compared with placebo or no intervention, or another bisphosphonate. Bisphosphonates compared with placebo or no intervention seem to decrease the urinary amino telopeptides of collagen I (NTx) concentration (MD -16.93 nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine; 95% CI -23.77 to -10.10; 2 trials with 88 patients; I² = 0%) and serum osteocalcin (SMD -0.81; 95% CI -1.22 to -0.39; 3 trials with 100 patients; I² = 34 %) concentration. The former result was supported by trial sequential analysis, but not the latter. Alendronate compared with another bisphosphonate (ibandronate) had no significant effect on serum osteocalcin concentration (MD -3.61 ng/ml, 95% CI -9.41 to 2.18; 2 trials with 47 patients; I² = 82%) in a random-effects meta-analysis, but it significantly decreased serum osteocalcin (MD -4.40 ng/ml, 95% CI -6.75 to -2.05; 2 trials with 47 patients; I² = 82%), the procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (MD -8.79 ng/ml, 95% CI -15.96 to -1.63; 2 trials with 47 patients; I² = 38%), and NTx concentration (MD -14.07 nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine, 95% CI -24.23 to -3.90; 2 trials with 46 patients; I²=0%) in a fixed-effect model. The latter two results were not supported by trial sequential analyses. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients having bisphosphonates withdrawn due to adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (RD -0.04; 95% CI -0.21 to 0.12; 2 trials with 46 patients; I² = 0%), or another bisphosphonate (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.17; 2 trials with 62 patients; I² = 0%). One trial with 32 participants and with high risk of bias compared etidronate versus sodium fluoride without finding significant difference regarding mortality, fractures, adverse events, or bone mineral density. Etidronate compared with sodium fluoride significantly decreased serum osteocalcin, urinary hydroxyproline, and parathyroid hormone concentration.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence to support or refute the use of bisphosphonates for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The data seem to indicate a possible positive intervention effect of bisphosphonates on decreasing urinary amino telopeptides of collagen I concentration compared with placebo or no intervention with no risk of random error. There is need for more randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis on patient-relevant outcomes in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Prevention of fractures after solid organ transplantation: a meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Bone loss and fracture are serious sequelae of organ transplantation, particularly in the first posttransplant year. Most interventional studies have been inadequately powered to detect effects on fracture.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether treatment with bisphosphonates (BP) or active vitamin D analogs (vitD) during the first year after transplantation reduces fracture risk and estimate the effect of these interventions on bone loss.

DATA SOURCES

Sources included PUBMED, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and abstracts from scientific meetings (presented 2003-2010).

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled clinical trials of BP or vitD in solid organ transplant recipients were included if treatment was initiated at the time of transplantation and fracture data were collected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators independently extracted data and rated study quality. Fixed effect and random-effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eleven studies of 780 transplant recipients (134 fractures) were included. Treatment with BP or vitD reduced the number of subjects with fracture [odds ratio (OR) 0.50 (0.29, 0.83)] and number of vertebral fractures, [OR 0.24 (0.07, 0.78)]. An increase in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine [2.98% (1.31, 4.64)] and femoral neck [3.05% (2.16, 3.93)] was found with treatment. When BP trials (nine studies, 625 subjects) were examined separately, there was a reduction in number of subjects with fractures [OR 0.53 (0.30, 0.91)] but no significant reduction in vertebral fractures [OR 0.34 (0.09, 1.24)].

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with BP or vitD during the first year after solid organ transplant was associated with a reduction in the number of subjects with fractures and fewer vertebral fractures.

Medical management of the liver transplant recipient

Long-term survival of liver transplant recipients has become the rule rather than the exception. As a result, the medical complications of long-term survival, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, metabolic bone disease, and de novo malignancy, have accounted for an increasing proportion of late morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for these complications begin before transplant and are potentially modifiable but are exacerbated by the requirement for immunosuppressive medications after transplantation. Surveillance and early intervention programs administered by transplant hepatologists and other medical subspecialists may improve long-term outcomes in liver transplant recipients by ameliorating risk factors for atherosclerosis, bone fractures, and cancer.

Densitometric threshold and vertebral fractures in heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Bone disease is one of the major complications of solid organ transplantation, causes considerable morbidity, and most patients are treated with immunosuppressant drugs after graft. The majority of studies reported rapid bone loss and an increased incidence of fractures after transplantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate osteoporosis and fracture prevalence, bone metabolism, and the effect of immunosuppressant agents on bone after heart transplantation.

METHODS

We planned a cross-sectional study in 180 heart transplant patients recruited from 3 different centers with a less than 10 years from graft. Each patient underwent a densitometric scan, and in 157 of them, an x-ray of the spine was performed to evaluate fractures. Biochemical assessment of bone metabolism was made at the time of the visit. Physical activity, diet, and calcium intake were evaluated using a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures were diagnosed in 40% of subjects, but densitometric osteoporosis was observed only in 13% of spine and in 25% of hip scans. Interestingly, increasing T-score threshold up to -1.5 standard deviation, the prevalence of fractured patient improved significantly, reaching 60% in both genders. Bone content was inversely correlated with glucocorticoids, while a positive correlation was found with cyclosporine A. Almost all subjects had vitamin D deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard densitometric criteria are unreliable to identify bone fragility after transplantation, and a different threshold (-1.5 standard deviation) should be considered. Transplanted patients should be adequately supplemented with vitamin D, and the effects of immunosuppressant agents on bone need further investigation.

Safety of long-term bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis

Drugs in the bisphosphonate class are the most commonly prescribed therapeutic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy in reducing fracture risk, with favourable safety profiles, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, long-term use in clinical practice has been associated with reports of undesirable events not previously recognized. These have included gastrointestinal intolerance, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femur fractures, oesophageal cancer, atrial fibrillation and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Physicians must be alert to newly recognized safety concerns, understand the level of evidence supporting them and be able to effectively communicate the balance of expected benefit and potential risk to patients. Usually, post-marketing adverse events are first presented as case reports or observational studies with variable levels of supporting evidence for plausibility, pathophysiology and causality. Widespread coverage in the news media, which can be alarming to patients and their physicians, may not present a balanced view of the proven benefits, the uncertain risks of therapy and the relative magnitude of these events. There may be confusion about the risks associated with bisphosphonate use for the treatment of osteoporosis versus treatment of other conditions, such as cancer, which typically involves a very different patient population and different doses or frequency of drug administration. Often reports of possible adverse events do not provide information on the number of patients exposed to the drug in proportion to the reported adverse event, or do not describe the incidence of the adverse event in a comparator population not exposed to the drug. Gastrointestinal intolerance with oral bisphosphonates, and hypocalcaemia, acute phase reactions and renal toxicity with intravenous bisphosphonates are characterized by biological plausibility and demonstration of causality. Safety concerns with uncertain biological plausibility and unproven causality include osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femur fractures, oesophageal cancer and ocular inflammation. Suspected concerns that are unlikely to be causally related include atrial fibrillation and hepatotoxicity. When making the decision to use a bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis, the balance between benefit and potential risks according to clinical circumstances of each patient should be considered.