THE URINE SEDIMENT IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS

The relationship between abnormal urinalysis findings and appendicitis location

AIMS

Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen in general surgery and early diagnosis is crucial for prognosis. Abnormal urinalysis results have been associated with appendicitis in some studies, with reports of microscopic hematuria or pyuria in laboratory tests. The aim of this article is to evaluate the relationship between laboratory findings of hematuria, pyuria, and the location of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 577 patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, at the general surgery clinic of Samsun Training and Research Hospital.

RESULTS

Among the 577 patients, 247 were female and 330 were male, with a median age of 34 years. A statistically significant difference was observed between appendicitis location and erythrocyte values (p = 0.009), specifically in paraileal and retrocecal locations. There was a statistically significant difference between appendicitis location and leukocyte values (p < 0.001), with significant differences found in paraileal, promontoric, and retrocecal locations. A statistically significant difference was observed between appendicitis location and leukocyte esterase values (p = 0.002), specifically in paraileal and retrocecal locations.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Abnormal urinalysis findings are not uncommon in patients with acute appendicitis. Our study demonstrated a significant correlation between tit erythrocyte, tit leukocyte, and tit leukocyte esterase positivity with appendicitis locations. Therefore, we believe that pathological findings in urine tests of patients undergoing surgery with a preliminary diagnosis of appendicitis can provide valuable information to surgeons regarding the location of the appendix, ultimately aiding in optimizing the timing and cost of the operation.

Left-Sided Appendicitis: More Than Meets the Eye

ABSTRACT

Classic appendicitis is a common condition easily diagnosed by emergency care providers. However, atypical cases represent a diagnostic challenge and can contribute to increased morbidity from a delay in definitive care. It is important to recognize that atypical presentations have an increased risk for underlying anatomic variants, which may require additional imaging as part of management. We present a case of a 13-year-old previously healthy adolescent boy with acute onset of left-sided abdominal pain who was found to have appendicitis in the setting of underlying malrotation.

Different urinalysis appearances in children with simple and perforated appendicitis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether routine urinalysis may serve as a tool in discriminating between acute appendicitis and perforated appendicitis in children.

BASIC PROCEDURES

We prospectively collected 357 patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. Urinalysis was performed in patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis before surgical intervention. Routine urinalysis is composed of 2 examinations: chemical tests for abnormal chemical constituents and microscopic tests for abnormal insoluble constituents. Receiver operating characteristic curves for urine white blood cell (WBC) counts and urine red blood cell (RBC) counts in distinguishing between patients with simple appendicitis and patients with perforated appendicitis were also analyzed.

MAIN FINDINGS

Urine ketone bodies, leukocyte esterase, specific gravity, pH, WBC, and RBC counts were all significant parameters among patients with normal appendices, simple appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis (all P < .05). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, positive urine ketone bodies and nitrate were significant parameters in predicting perforated appendicitis (P = .002 and P = .008, respectively). According to the results of receiver operating characteristic curves, the appropriate cutoff values were 2.0/high-power field for urine RBC counts and 4.0/high-power field for urine WBC counts in predicting perforated appendicitis in children.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Routine urinalysis may serve to aid in discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis. Clinically, we believe that these urine parameters may aid primary emergency physicians with decision making in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis.

An appendicular mass mimicking a bladder tumour

We present a case of an appendicular mass mimicking symptoms of a bladder tumour in a 27-year-old female. The patient initially presented with a 5-month history of intermittent lower abdominal pain associated with dysuria, anorexia and weight loss. Cystoscopy revealed an erythematous urothelium with the appearance of a solid mass bulging into the bladder posteriorly. Urothelial biopsies were negative and computerised tomography showed a soft tissue mass extending from the right superior aspect of the bladder and abutting the distal ileum. At laparoscopy an appendiceal mass adherent to the bladder was found. The symptoms later resolved and she is well at follow-up.

Appendicitis

A complete understanding of the anatomy, pathophysiology, and presenting signs and symptoms of appendicitis, combined with a thorough history and physical examination, will be the most important factors in allowing the practicing emergency physician to make the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis. For patients in which the diagnosis is less clear or for patients in high-risk groups (extremes of age, pregnant women, and immunocompromised patients) additional diagnostic testing, usually US or CT, and early surgical consultation are recommended.

A chance of misdiagnosis between acute appendicitis and renal colic

The symptoms of right-sided renal colic mimic sometimes acute appendicitis. A prospective comparative study of 188 patients with ureteral stone and 188 patients with acute appendicitis was performed to evaluate the features of differential diagnosis. Appendicitis caused more often nausea (81 vs 11%), fever and localized pain in the McBurney (97 vs 59%) than renal colic. The patients with ureteral stone had tenderness in 16% in the right lower quadrant. The mean values of C-reactive protein (41 mg/l) and blood leukocytes (14 x 10(9)/l) were elevated in appendicitis, but not in renal colic (14 mg/l and 10 x 10(9)/ l). Urinanalysis revealed red cells in 92% of ureteral stones compared with 26% in appendicitis. Only one of 188 patients with appendicitis was first misdiagnosed to have renal colic. A mistake of appendicitis for ureteral stone is clinically rare occurring only once or twice per year in the hospital where 700-800 emergency appendectomies are annually performed.

Urinalysis, ultrasound analysis, and renal dynamic scintigraphy in acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

The influence of acute appendicitis (AA) on the right kidney and urinalysis was investigated. Permanent damage of the urinary tract and abnormal urinalysis have been previously reported in AA.

METHODS

Appendectomy was performed in 84 patients with no previous urogenital, retroperitoneal, or pelvic disease, trauma, or operation. AA was confirmed in 66 of them. Control groups were the remaining 18 patients and 40 patients with varicocele repair. Renal sonography and urinalyses were done prior to operation, on days 1, 3, and 6 postoperatively. Pentetic acid renal scintigraphy was done on postoperative day 1 in patients with abnormal urinalysis. An obstructive radiographic curve indicated furosemide renography.

RESULTS

Abnormal urinalysis was found in 48% of patients with AA before appendectomy and in 12% on day 6 postoperatively. Sonography showed pyelocaliceal dilation of the right kidney in 38% of patients with AA prior to appendectomy and in none on day 6 postoperatively. Patients with AA had pyelocaliceal dilation of the right kidney more frequently than those in the control groups (P < 0.001). It was more frequent in patients having abnormal urinalysis (P < 0.01). Scintigraphy confirmed pyelocaliceal dilation of the right kidney in 38% of patients with abnormal urinalysis. Furosemide renography excluded an obstruction in all of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation is the major cause of abnormal urinalysis and transitory pyelocaliceal dilation in some patients with AA. Erythrocyturia, pyuria, proteinuria, and pyelocaliceal dilation detected by sonography or scintigraphy can frequently be found in patients with AA, but should not mislead the surgeon in the diagnosis of AA.

Urological manifestations of acute appendicitis

The diagnosis of appendicitis may be difficult to establish even for the experienced surgeon. Considerable variability in presenting symptoms and signs, resulting in part from the numerous locations in which the appendix may be found, contributes to diagnostic insecurity. Appendicitis that mimics acute disorders of the genitourinary tract is a rare cause of diagnostic confusion. The association of appendicitis with abnormal urinary sediment or ureteral obstruction has been reported previously. We report 3 cases of proved appendicitis that presented with other symptoms suggestive of acute urological disorders (gross hematuria, acute prostatis and acute pyelonephritis). While gross hematuria caused by appendicitis has been reported previously, cases of appendicitis mimicking acute prostatitis or rupture of a renal calix with extravasation of urine following ureteral obstruction have not been described. Recognition of unusual manifestations of appendicitis is essential in current surgical practice. Appendicitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of acute urological disorders.

Appendicitis near its centenary

In an analysis of the first 72 cases treated after the formulation of the appendicitis syndrome in 1886 compared with the experience from 1929-1959 and with 307 randomly selected recent cases, the major therapeutic trend has been an emphasis on appendectomy before perforation and abscess formation occur. The rate of infection nonetheless remains approximately 17%. Although the overall mortality rate has declined from 26% overall (40% for surgery) to 0.8%, the current rate of perforation is 28%, with a diagnostic accuracy of 82%. Among 13,848 patients from several reports the perforation rate increases linearly with diagnostic accuracy; therefore, a balance must be sought. Delay awaiting a diagnosis is a major determinant of perforation, but diagnostic aids are of limited help. Clinical acuity and prudent decisiveness are the keys to proper action.

Abnormal urinalysis in appendicitis

In a retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients (50 adults and 50 children) with acute appendicitis we correlated abnormal urinalysis (positive occult blood and more than 4 red or white blood cells per high power field) with the operative findings. Abnormal results on urinalysis were noted in 18 adults and 12 children. All urine specimens were collected by the clean-catch method. Abnormal findings were found more frequently in female patients. A majority of patients (53 per cent) with abnormal results on urinalysis had a ruptured or inflamed appendix in proximity to the urinary tract.

Retrocecal appendicitis

The clinical presentation of 105 cases of retrocecal appendicitis was reviewed. Thirty-six percent of the patients had the classic appendicitis scenario of periumbilical pain localizing to the right lower quadrant, accompanied by anorexia, nausea and vomiting, and tenderness and guarding in the right lower quadrant. The remaining 64 percent had subtle variations of this presentation. Retrocecal appendicitis did not have a distinctive clinical pattern in our series. Twelve of the 105 retrocecal appendices were also retroperitoneal. The diagnosis was delayed in four patients and two had flank pain. Five of the twelve appendices were either gangrenous or perforated. Although the number of patients is small, we conclude that the traditional type of retrocecal appendicitis can occur in the retroperitoneal subgroup but that his anatomic variation is infrequent. The incidence in our series was 2.5 percent.