Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer

Multimodal ultrasound imaging: a method to improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node diagnosis in breast cancer

Aim

This study assessed the utility of multimodal ultrasound in enhancing the accuracy of breast cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment and compared it with single-modality ultrasound.

Methods

Preoperative examinations, including two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US), intradermal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), intravenous CEUS, shear-wave elastography (SWE), and surface localization, were conducted on 86 SLNs from breast cancer patients. The diagnostic performance of single and multimodal approaches for detecting metastatic SLNs was compared to postoperative pathological results.

Results

Among the 86 SLNs, 29 were pathologically diagnosed as metastatic, and 57 as non-metastatic. Single-modality ultrasounds had AUC values of 0.826 (intradermal CEUS), 0.705 (intravenous CEUS), 0.678 (2D US), and 0.677 (SWE), respectively. Intradermal CEUS significantly outperformed the other methods (p<0.05), while the remaining three methods had no statistically significant differences (p>0.05). Multimodal ultrasound, combining intradermal CEUS, intravenous CEUS, 2D US, and SWE, achieved an AUC of 0.893, with 86.21% sensitivity and 84.21% specificity. The DeLong test confirmed that multimodal ultrasound was significantly better than the four single-modal ultrasound methods (p<0.05). Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curves demonstrated the superior performance of multimodal ultrasound in identifying high-risk SLN patients.

Conclusion

Multimodal ultrasound improves breast cancer SLN identification and diagnostic accuracy.

Molecular insights and novel approaches for targeting tumor metastasis

In recent years, due to the effective drug delivery and preciseness of tumor sites or microenvironment, the targeted drug delivery approaches have gained ample attention for tumor metastasis therapy. The conventional treatment approaches for metastasis therapy have reported with immense adverse effects because they exhibited maximum probability of killing the carcinogenic cells along with healthy cells. The tumor vasculature, comprising of vasculogenic impressions and angiogenesis, greatly depends upon the growth and metastasis in the tumors. Therefore, various nanocarriers-based delivery approaches for targeting to tumor vasculature have been attempted as efficient and potential approaches for the treatment of tumor metastasis and the associated lesions. Furthermore, the targeted drug delivery approaches have found to be most apt way to overcome from all the limitations and adverse effects associated with the conventional therapies. In this review, various approaches for efficient targeting of pharmacologically active chemotherapeutics against tumor metastasis with the cohesive objectives of prognosis, tracking and therapy are summarized.

Relationship between Upper Extremity Lymphatic Drainage and Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between upper extremity lymphatics and sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients.

Methods

Forty-four patients who underwent axillary reverse mapping (ARM) during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with SNL biopsy (SLNB) between February 2017 and October 2017 were investigated. ARM was performed using indocyanine green (ICG) to locate the upper extremity lymphatics; methylene blue dye was injected intradermally for SLN mapping.

Results

ARM nodes were found in the ALND fields of all examined patients. The rate of identification of upper extremity lymphatics within the SLNB field was 65.9% (29 of 44). The ARM nodes were involved in metastases arising from primary breast tumors in 7 of the patients (15.9%), while no metastases were detected in pathologic axillary lymph node-negative patients. Lymphatics from the upper extremity drained into the SLNs in 5 of the 44 patients (11.4%); their ARM-detected nodes were found to be in close proximity to the SLNs.

Conclusions

The ARM nodes and SLNs are closely related and share lymphatic drainage routes. The ARM procedure using fluorescence imaging is both feasible and, in patients who are SLN negative, oncologically safe. ARM using ICG is therefore effective for identifying and preserving upper extremity lymphatics, and SLNB combined with ARM appears to be a promising surgical refinement for preventing upper extremity lymphoedema.

Clinical Trial Registration

This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02651142.

Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer

Rationale and Objectives. To compare the sensitivities of ultrasound guided core biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) for detection of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a current diagnosis of ipsilateral breast cancer. Materials and Methods. From December 2008 to December 2010, 105 patients with breast cancer and abnormal appearing lymph nodes in the ipsilateral axilla consented to undergo FNA of an axillary node immediately followed by core biopsy of the same node, both with ultrasound guidance. Experienced pathologists evaluated the aspirate cytology without knowledge of the core histology. Cytology and core biopsy results were compared to sentinel node excision or axillary dissection pathology. Sensitivities were compared using McNemar's test. Results. Of 70 patients with axillary node metastases, FNA was positive in 55/70 (78.6%) and core was positive in 61/70 (87.1%) (P = 0.18). The FNA and core results were discordant in 14/70 (20%) patients. Ten cases were FNA negative/core positive. Four cases were FNA positive/core negative. Conclusion. Core biopsy detected six (8.6%) more cases of metastatic lymphadenopathy than FNA but the difference in sensitivities was not statistically significant. Core biopsy should be considered if the node is clearly imaged and readily accessible. FNA is a good alternative when a smaller needle is desired due to node location or other patient factors. This trial is registered with NCT01920139.

Should a sentinel node biopsy be performed in patients with high-risk breast cancer?

A negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy spares many breast cancer patients the complications associated with lymph node irradiation or additional surgery. However, patients at high risk for nodal involvement based on clinical characteristics may remain at unacceptably high risk of axillary disease even after a negative SLN biopsy result. A Bayesian nomogram was designed to combine the probability of axillary disease prior to nodal biopsy with customized test characteristics for an SLN biopsy and provides the probability of axillary disease despite a negative SLN biopsy. Users may individualize the sensitivity of an SLN biopsy based on factors known to modify the sensitivity of the procedure. This tool may be useful in identifying patients who should have expanded upfront exploration of the axilla or comprehensive axillary irradiation.

Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive axillary nodes

BACKGROUND

Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) after the delivery of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We here report our experience in NAC-treated patients with locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive axillary nodes, and compare it with the results from our previous randomized trial assessing SLNB in early-stage breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients with large infiltrating tumor and clinically positive axillary nodes received NAC and subsequent lymphatic mapping, SLNB and complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was compared to that of the axilla.

RESULTS

At least one SLN was identified in 60 of the 64 patients (93.8%). Among those 60 patients, 37 (61.7%) had one or more positive SLN(s) and 23 (38.3%) did not. Two of the patients with negative SLN(s) presented metastases in other non-sentinel nodes. SLNB thus had a false-negative rate, a negative predictive value and an overall accuracy of 5.1%, 91.3% and 96.7%, respectively. All these values were similar to those we reported for SLNB in the settings of early-stage breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

SLNB after NAC is safe and feasible in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive nodes, and accurately predicts the status of the axilla.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer surgery--working with the risks of vital blue dye to reap the benefits

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important method of staging early breast cancer because of the inherent benefits it confers on patients in terms of arm function and quality of life. Its success depends on a high level of accuracy in detecting the sentinel node. This is achieved by a dual mapping technique that employs a radio-labelled nanocolloid and a vital blue dye. The vital dyes however carry the risk of anaphylaxis, and as more surgeons employ SLNB in their daily practice, a proportionate rise in the number of anaphylactic reactions can be expected. A comprehensive review of risks and benefits associated with using vital blues dyes has not been published and therefore a retrospective review was undertaken of the different levels of anaphylaxis associated with vital dyes as well as their benefits in SLNB.

METHODS

An OVID MEDLINE search was performed of the English published literature using appropriate search terms to find published trial data and case series that focused on adverse reactions to vital blue dyes.

RESULTS

The risk of severe anaphylaxis (grade 3) can be as low as 0.06%, and up to 0.4% for patients undergoing SLNB when data is analysed from large trials. Furthermore, adverse reactions associated with blue dyes are reversible with appropriate management.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should continue to use vital dyes to ensure that SLNB remains a highly sensitive procedure.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: an analysis of the maximum number of nodes requiring excision

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is now the standard of care in assessment of patients with clinically staged T1-2, N0 breast cancers. This study investigates whether there is a maximum number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) that need to be excised without compromising the false-negative (FN) rate of this procedure. Data were prospectively collected for 319 patients undergoing SNB between February 2001 and December 2006 at our institution. This data were analysed, both in terms of the order of SLN retrieval and relative isotope counts of the SLNs, in order to determine the maximum number of SLNs that need to be retrieved without increasing the FN rate. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between SLN blue dye concentration and the presence of SLN metastases. The SLN identification rate was 97% with no false-negative cases amongst patients undergoing simultaneous axillary clearance historically during technique validation. In patients with SLN metastases, excision of the first 4 SLNs encountered results in the identification of a metastatic SLN in all cases. Although the majority (86%) of SNB metastases are in the hottest node, the SLN containing the metastasis is in the first 4 hottest nodes in 99% of patients with nodal metastases. The remaining 1% of SLN metastases were identified by blue dye. There was no statistically significant association between the SLN blue dye concentration and the presence of SLN metastases. A policy to remove a maximum of four blue and/or hot SLNs along with any palpably abnormal lymph nodes does not result in an increased false-negative rate of detection of SLN metastases.

A 10-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in patients with early stage breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes treated with tangential breast irradiation following sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance

We compare long-term outcomes in patients with node negative early stage breast cancer treated with breast radiotherapy (RT) without the axillary RT field after sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We hypothesize that though tangential RT was delivered to the breast tissue, it at least partially sterilized occult axillary nodal metastases thus providing low nodal failure rates. Between 1995 and 2001, 265 patients with AJCC stages I-II breast cancer were treated with lumpectomy and either SLND (cohort SLND) or SLND and ALND (cohort ALND). Median follow-up was 9.9 years (range 8.3-15.3 years). RT was administered to the whole breast to the median dose of 48.2 Gy (range 46.0-50.4 Gy) plus boost without axillary RT. Chi-square tests were employed in comparing outcomes of two groups for axillary and supraclavicular failure rates, ipsilateral in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), distant metastases (DM), and chronic complications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared using log-rank test. There were 136/265 (51%) and 129/265 (49%) patients in the SLND and ALND cohorts, respectively. The median number of axillary lymph nodes assessed was 2 (range 1-5) in cohort SLND and 18 (range 7-36) in cohort ALND (P < 0.0001). Incidence of AFR and SFR in both cohorts was 0%. The rates of IBTR and DM in both cohorts were not significantly different. Median PFS in the SLND cohort is 14.6 years and 10-year PFS is 88.2%. Median PFS in the ALND group is 15.0 years and 10-year PFS is 85.7%. At a 10-year follow-up chronic lymphedema occurred in 5/108 (4.6%) and 40/115 (34.8%) in cohorts SLND and ALND, respectively (P = 0.0001). This study provides mature evidence that patients with negative nodes, treated with tangential breast RT and SLND alone, experience low AFR or SFR. Our findings, while awaiting mature long-term data from NSABP B-32, support that in patients with negative axillary nodal status such treatment provides excellent long-term cure rates while avoiding morbidities associated with ALND or addition of axillary RT field.

High-resolution fiber optic microscopy with fluorescent contrast enhancement for the identification of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a pilot study

This prospective pilot study evaluates the potential of high-resolution fiber optic microscopy (HRFM) to identify lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. 43 lymph nodes were collected from 14 consenting breast cancer patients. Proflavine dye was topically applied to lymph nodes ex vivo to allow visualization of nuclei. 242 images were collected at 105 sites with confirmed histopathologic diagnosis. Quantitative statistical features were calculated from images, assessed with one-way ANOVA, and were used to develop a classification algorithm with the goal of objectively discriminating between normal and metastatic tissue. A classification algorithm using mean image intensity and skewness achieved sensitivity of 79% (27/34) and specificity of 77% (55/71). This study demonstrates the technical feasibility and diagnostic potential of HRFM with fluorescent contrast in the ex vivo evaluation of lymph nodes from breast cancer patients.

Deeply penetrating in vivo photoacoustic imaging using a clinical ultrasound array system

Using a hand-held photoacoustic probe integrated with a clinical ultrasound array system, we successfully imaged objects deeply positioned in biological tissues. The optical contrasts were enhanced by methylene blue with a concentration of ~30 mM. The penetration depth reached ~5.2 cm in chicken breast tissue by using 650-nm wavelength, which is ~4.7 times the 1/e optical penetration depth. This imaging depth was achieved using a laser fluence on the tissue surface of only 3 mJ/cm(2), which is 1/7 of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) safety limit (20 mJ/cm(2)). The noise equivalent sensitivity at this depth was ~11 mM. Further, after intradermal injection of methylene blue in a rat, a sentinel lymph node was easily detected in vivo, beneath a 2-cm thick layer of chicken breast. Also, blood located 3.5 cm deep in the rat was clearly imaged with intrinsic contrast. We have photoacoustically guided insertion of a needle into a rat sentinel lymph node with accumulated methylene blue. These results highlight the clinical potential of photoacoustic image-guided identification and needle biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary staging in breast cancer patients.

Sentinel node detection method using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with sonazoid in breast cancer: preliminary clinical study

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in breast cancer using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with subareolar Sonazoid injection. The subjects were 20 breast cancer patients. General anesthesia was induced and 2 mL of Sonazoid was injected subareolarly. After massage of the injection site, the axillary area was observed transdermally using coded phase inversion harmonic ultrasonography with mechanical indices of 0.15 to 0.19. When contrast-enhanced lymph nodes (LNs) were seen, they were defined as CE-SLN. Two other SLN detection methods, the gamma-probe-guided and dye-guided methods, were performed together. We evaluated the SLNs detected by each method to determine if they corresponded with each other and calculated the SLN detection rate. After the SLNs were resected, pathologic examinations were done. The SLN detection rate of the CEUS-guided method, the dye-guided method and the gamma-probe-guided method were 70%, 75% and 100%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in these rates between the CEUS-guided and dye-guided methods (p = 0.99) but the CEUS-guided method showed a significantly lower rate than the gamma-probe-guided method (p = 0.020), and dye-guided method also showed a significantly lower rate than the gamma-probe-guided method (p = 0.047). The number of CE-SLNs was 1 or 2 (average 1.1) and each took 2 to 20 (average 5.3) min to detect. The CE-SLNs corresponded grossly with SLNs detected by the gamma-probe-guided and dye-guided methods. The pathologic results indicated no metastasis from the resected SLNs in 15 of 20 cases. However, the CEUS-guided method detected 12 cases of these 15 and CE-SLNs were detected in two of the remaining five metastasis cases. In summary, in breast cancer patients, after subareolar injection of Sonazoid, contrast-enhanced LNs were observed in real time with ultrasonography. In an initial clinical study of 20 cases, the detection rate of the CEUS-guided method was less than that of the gamma-probe-guided method. It is suggested that the CEUS-guided method using Sonazoid may, with some improvements, be a useful new modality for sentinel node identification.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast neoplasms]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Sentinel node (SN) is the first draining node from the malignant tumor site. In the last decade, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been introduced as an alternative to axillary dissection in breast cancer. I n patients with negative SNB (sentinel node uninvolved with malignancy) axillary dissection is not recommended. The aim of this stady was defining the indications for SNB, and SNB principles, as well as the survey of our first experiences.

METHODS

In the period from 2004 to 2008, we performed 78 SNBs in 75 patients (72 females, 3 males) with breast cancer. Indications for SNB were T1-2 and N0 lesions according to TNM classification (Tumor, Nodus Methastasis). In all cases, lymphoscintigraphy was done first, and then SNB with double contrast (methylen blue and technetium - Tc-99). In 57 (73%) cases, one SN was confirmed, and in 21 (26.9%) 2 nodes.

RESULTS

In 58 (74.3%) SNB, SN pathohistology was negative, ie. there were no cancer metastases. In this group of patients, axillary dissection was not done in 47 (81%) SNB. In the remaining 11 (18.9%), lymphonodal dissection level I and II was done after SNB, regardless of the presence or no presence of metastases within SN. All the cases were monitored from six months to one year of the operation and disease progression was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node biopsy is an acceptable method of breast cancer diagnosis and a good alternative to lymphonodal dissection if there are no metastases within SN. The technique is relatively simple, but requires team work of experienced specialists: surgeons, nuclear medicine specialists and anesthesiologists. Our first experiences suggest a high degree of reliability of the method in selected patients and with well trained team of doctors.

Optimal number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes to remove for accurate axillary staging of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard technique for staging the axilla of clinically node-negative breast cancer, the optimal number of radioactive SLNs to remove to ensure accuracy and minimize morbidity is still actively debated. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum number of SLNs to excise to ensure accurate axillary staging of SLN-positive patients.

METHODS

A total of 126 patients with invasive breast cancer underwent SLN biopsy by periareolar injection of radiolabeled technetium sulfur colloid on the day of surgery. The sequence in which SLNs were removed and the corresponding ex vivo radioactive counts were recorded. SLNs were removed until radioactive counts in the axilla were less than 10% of the ex vivo counts of the hottest SLN.

RESULTS

A radioactive SLN was identified in every patient. The mean number of SLNs identified was 2.86 (range, 1-8). Clinicopathologic features associated with a positive SLN included a palpable tumor (P = .0035), increasing tumor size (P = .0039), increasing histologic grade (P = .0234), and angiolymphatic invasion (P < .001). The highest radioactive counts were found in the first node in 100 patients (79.4%), the second node in 15 (11.9%), and the third or later node in 11 patients (8.7%). Among the 38 patients with a positive SLN (30.2%), the hottest node was the first positive SLN in 27 patients (71.1%). The first positive SLN was the first node removed in 31 patients (81.6%) and after the second node in 37 patients (97.4%); it was removed in all patients by the third SLN.

CONCLUSION

These data support the trend of limiting SLN biopsy to 3 lymph nodes. Removing all SLNs with radioactive counts greater than 10% of the ex vivo counts of the hottest SLN did not increase accuracy.

Clinical validation of a molecular assay for intra-operative detection of metastases in breast sentinel lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer patients, the status of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been shown to accurately reflect the presence of metastases in the axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). Intra-operative SLN evaluation by frozen section histology may miss positive cases, leading to a second surgery for complete ALN dissection. Permanent section histology itself has tissue sampling limitations and is partially dependent on pathologist expertise.

METHODS

A prospective study (N=78) was conducted in our institution to validate a new intra-operative molecular assay, the GeneSearch breast lymph node (BLN) assay. This assay quantifies the expression of mammaglobin and cytokeratin-19 genes using quantitative RT-PCR technology to determine SLN status. Fresh SLN sections (2 mm thick) were analyzed alternatively by BLN assay or post-operative histology (haematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry). The subject was considered positive when histology revealed a focus >0.2 mm.

RESULTS

BLN assay results corroborated with histologic results in 75 out of 78 patients for an overall agreement of 96%, a sensitivity of 92%, and a specificity of 97%. The positive and negative predictive values of the BLN assay were of 86% (12/14) and 98% (63/64), respectively. Interestingly, a statistically significant correlation was observed between the metastases' histologic size and both assay markers' expression levels as represented by cycle time to positivity (rho > or = 0.71, all p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the BLN assay in identifying nodal metastases >0.2 mm was similar to that of permanent section histology, with the added advantages of an objective and rapid output that could be used for intra-operative decision to remove additional ALN.

Analysis of sentinel node involvement in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is performed for patients with early gastric cancer. Because sentinel nodes (SNs) to gastric cancer exist but they have not been well-described, we attempted to validate the SN concept at the micrometastasis level.

METHODS

For 53 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for T1/T2 (<4 cm) N0 gastric cancer, SNNS was performed with radioactive tin colloid and/or indocyanine green, and subsequent modified D1 lymphadenectomies were added. Whole formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of all resected lymph nodes from these patients were cut into 5-mum thick serial step sections at 85-mum intervals, and occult metastases were examined immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

Metastases were detected in 3 (1.5%) of 204 SNs and 3 (0.33%) of 901 non-SNs in pN0 cases and in 18 (46%) of 39 SNs and 3 (1.9%) of 158 non-SNs in pN1 cases. On a patient basis, metastases were detected in 4 (9%) of 46 pN0 patients, 2 (4%) each in SNs and non-SNs, and in 7 pN1 patients, of whom 7 and 4 had SN and non-SN metastases, respectively. The sensitivity, false-negative rate, and accuracy of SN identification by SNNS were 82%, 18%, and 96%, respectively, at the occult metastasis level. However, on the basis of the concept of the sentinel lymphatic station (SLS), which represents all lymphatic stations to which SNs belong, metastases were always limited to the lymph nodes in SLS in the 11 cases with metastases. Non-SN metastases occurred in 3 (60%) of 5 patients with SN metastases >2.0 mm in diameter but not in 4 patients with SN metastases </=2.0 mm in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

The sentinel node concept held true at the occult metastasis level in 96% of patients with gastric cancer, and the accuracy of SNNS was elevated to 100% by introducing the concept of the sentinel lymphatic station. The size of SN metastasis was a predictive factor for metastasis beyond the sentinel node.

Sentinel node biopsy in primary breast cancer: Radioactive detection and metastatic disease

AIM

To examine the relationship between the intensity of the radioactive counts and the presence of tumor metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in order to correctly identify the number of SLNs to be removed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred three breast cancer patients with successful radioisotope localization of SLNs using the combined blue dye and radioisotope method were analyzed. SLN biopsy was continued until all the blue-stained and radioactive nodes were removed.

RESULTS

The mean number of harvested SLNs was 1.7+/-0.9, and the number of radioactive SLNs among the harvested nodes was 1.6+/-0.8. SLN metastasis was found in 123 of the 503 cases. The metastasis was detected in the SLN with the highest radioactive count (the hottest SLN) in 94 of the 123 cases with positive SLNs. The positive rate in the hottest SLN was 89% in 61 cases with a single radioactive SLN, and 65% in 62 cases with multiple radioactive SLNs. Of the 29 cases with positivity in other than the hottest SLNs, the metastasis was detected in the second hottest SLN in 16 cases, in the third hottest SLN in one case, in a mixture of negative radioactive SLNs and blue-dye-stained in four cases, and in the negative SLNs and positive non-SLNs (false-negative) in eight cases. Of 123 node-positive cases, 111 cases had metastasis that was detected within the first three hottest SLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that lymph node metastasis may not always be detected in the hottest SLN. Thus, in practice, all radioactive and/or blue-dye-stained nodes should be removed for further examination.

Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Capecitabine and the Use of Thymidine Phosphorylase as a Predictive Biomarker in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) induction by docetaxel is a proposed mechanism for the observed preclinical synergy of docetaxel and capecitabine (DC). We evaluated whether TP protein expression is increased by docetaxel and correlates with pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Women with stage II to III breast cancer were given four cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine 2,000 mg/d, in two divided doses, on days 5 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Radiology-directed biopsies of the breast tumors were done at baseline and 5 days after the first dose of docetaxel to evaluate TP expression. Following DC therapy, patients had core breast biopsies, and if residual disease was present, received four cycles of standard dose-dense doxorubin and cyclophosphamide (AC).

RESULTS

The pCR rate was 26.9% (95% confidence interval, 11.6-47.8). Up-regulation of TP expression was not observed by either quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) or immunohistochemistry. Radiology-directed core biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy accurately predicted pathologic response in 88% (95% confidence interval, 69.8-97.6) of the cases. Neither level of TP expression nor TP up-regulation correlated with pCR. Significant toxicity resulted in therapy discontinuation in 3 of 26 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DC chemotherapy exhibited a similar pCR rate compared with standard taxane regimens, with increased toxicity. TP expression was not up-regulated after docetaxel and did not correlate with therapeutic response. Core breast biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy accurately predicted pathologic response.

Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping for cervix cancer--a detailed evaluation and time analysis

OBJECTIVE

To provide data from a US center on laparoscopic (LSC) approach to sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in cervix cancer with detailed time analysis.

METHODS

This prospective trial enrolled patients with stage IA2-IIA cervix cancer undergoing primary radical surgery. Tc-99 radiocolloid was injected the morning of surgery, followed by hybrid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy. Blue dye injection occurred just prior to incision. After bilateral LSC SLN detection, all patients received complete LSC pelvic lymphadenectomy. Institutional SLN protocol was followed for frozen section, hematoxylin and eosin, and cytokeratin staining.

RESULTS

Between December 2003 and February 2006, 20 enrolled patients received 9 LSC-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomies, 7 radical abdominal hysterectomies, 2 LSC-assisted radical vaginal trachelectomies, and 2 LSC lymphadenectomies alone (secondary to positive lymph nodes). Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm. Nineteen percent of the 64 SLNs were found in unusual sites, including common iliac (11%), presacral (5%) and para-aortic (3%). The negative predictive value was 100%. The combined technique detected SLNs bilaterally in all patients. If blue dye alone was used, this rate would have dropped to 67.5% and was negatively correlated with elapsed surgical time (-0.7; p=0.002). The ability to visualize blue SLNs remained steady for 30 min and was completely gone by 50 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic SLN mapping can be newly introduced into gynecologic oncology centers with high detection rates and negative predictive values. The visualization of blue dye in SLNs is transient, and this negative time correlation may explain the previously reported inferior detection rates with this technique. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION.: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 00205010.

Lymphatic Mapping Techniques and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

The axillary nodal status is accepted universally as the most powerful prognostic tool available for early stage breast cancer. The removal of level I and level II lymph nodes at axillary node dissection (ALND) is the most accurate method to assess nodal status, and it is the universal standard; however, it is associated with several adverse long-term sequelae. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged as an effective and safe alternative to the ALND for detecting axillary metastases. This article discusses some lymphatic mapping methodology.

Axillary Management After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients

According to the available data, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is proving to be an accurate staging technique with less post-surgical morbidity than standard axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Survival benefits associated with SLN biopsy and, as well as the significance of IHC detected micrometastases have yet to be determined. The long term results of several multicenter trials are pending, yet preliminary results are in favor of abandoning ALND in favor of the less invasive alternative. Despite this, ALND remains the standard of care in breast cancer patients with clinically palpable axillary lymph nodes that are suspicious for metastatic disease. Although controversial, many clinicians believe that axillary metastases will precede systemic spread of disease. Therefore, axillary clearance of clinically palpable nodes could potentially quell the progression of metastases. Regardless of whether or not this theory is true, not many would argue against debulking suspicious nodal disease.

Contraindications of sentinel lymph node biopsy: are there any really?

BACKGROUND

One of the most exciting and talked about new surgical techniques in breast cancer surgery is the sentinel lymph node biopsy. It is an alternative procedure to standard axillary lymph node dissection, which makes possible less invasive surgery and side effects for patients with early breast cancer that wouldn't benefit further from axillary lymph node clearance. Sentinel lymph node biopsy helps to accurately evaluate the status of the axilla and the extent of disease, but also determines appropriate adjuvant treatment and long-term follow-up. However, like all surgical procedures, the sentinel lymph node biopsy is not appropriate for each and every patient.

METHODS

In this article we review the absolute and relative contraindications of the procedure in respect to clinically positive axilla, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor size, multicentric and multifocal disease, in situ carcinoma, pregnancy, age, body-mass index, allergies to dye and/or radio colloid and prior breast and/or axillary surgery.

RESULTS

Certain conditions involving host factors and tumor biologic characteristics may have a negative impact on the success rate and accuracy of the procedure. The overall fraction of patients unsuitable or with multiple risk factors that may compromise the success of the sentinel lymph node biopsy, is very small. Nevertheless, these patients need to be successfully identified, appropriately advised and cautioned, and so do the surgeons that perform the procedure.

CONCLUSION

When performed by an experienced multi-disciplinary team, the SLNB is a highly effective and accurate alternative to standard level I and II axillary clearance in the vast majority of patients with early breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Rates: The Influence of Radiocolloid Mapping, Case Volume, and the Place of the Procedure

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that high-volume surgeons performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy at an academic medical center (AMC) would have the same identification rates at suburban surgical centers (SSCs).

METHODS

Twenty-one surgeons performed 1199 SLN biopsies in 1187 clinically node-negative patients with an intraoperative gamma probe (IOGP) plus blue dye (at AMC) or blue dye alone (at SSCs). Demographic, radiologic, and pathological data were analyzed by generalized estimating equations logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Four surgeons (group 1) performed 877 procedures (361, 247, 152, and 117 cases each), 426 with and 451 without IOGP. Seventeen surgeons (group 2) performed 322 procedures (2-92 cases each), 173 with and 149 without IOGP. Group 1 found 411 SLNs (96.5%) with and 419 (92.9%) without IOGP (P = .024). Group 2 found 163 (94.2%) with and 117 (78.5%) without IOGP (P < .0001). The odds of finding the SLN was 2.9 times higher with IOGP (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8, 4.7; P < .001) and 2.7 times higher by group 1 than group 2 surgeons (95% CI, 1.7, 4.3; P < .001), controlling for tumor size and surgery type.

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume surgeons identified more SLNs with IOGP (at the AMC) than without (at the SSCs). They also were more efficient than low-volume surgeons when blue dye alone was used. Low-volume surgeons were almost as efficient as high-volume surgeons when they used IOGP. Optimal identification of SLNs requires nuclear medicine facilities.

Surgery and radiotherapy in vulvar cancer

The majority of patients with vulvar cancer have squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The cornerstone of the treatment is surgery. Radical vulvectomy with "en bloc" inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has led to a favorable prognosis but with impressive morbidity. Nowadays, treatment is more individualized with wide local excision with uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy via separate incisions as the standard treatment for early stage patients with SCC of the vulva with depth of invasion >1 mm without suspicious groins. In case of more than one intranodal lymph node metastasis and/or extranodal growth, postoperative radiotherapy on the groins and pelvis is warranted. Until now there is a limited role for primary radiotherapy on the vulva and/or groins in early stage disease. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with a radioactive tracer and intraoperative blue dye) is a promising staging technique for patients with early stage vulvar cancer. The safety of clinical implementation of the SLN procedure and the role of additional histopathological techniques of the SLNs need to be further investigated before its wide-scale application. Patients with advanced vulvar cancer are difficult to treat. One of the problems in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer is the high incidence of concomitant bulky lymph nodes in the groin(s). Ultraradical surgery in case of resectable disease will lead to impressive morbidity because of the exenterative-type procedure. (Chemo)radiation with or without surgery should be regarded as the first choice for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer only when primary surgery will necessitate performance of a stoma. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal combined modality treatment in these patients. Due to the fact that vulvar cancer is a rare disease, further clinical studies will only be possible, when international collaborative groups will join forces in order to perform clinical trials, in which different treatment options such as SLN procedure, primary radiotherapy on the groins and multimodality treatment for advanced disease will be investigated.

Axillary recurrence after modified radical mastectomy

Optimal management for axillary recurrence is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for overall survival in the patients with axillary recurrence. Data of 1098 patients were collected from breast cancer registers from Clinic for Oncology Nis between 1990-1995. All patients underwent modified radical mastectomy. Axillary recurence was diganosed in 43 (3.92%) patients. Most patients were presented with a localized, palpable axillary mass 30 (69.77%). Cox multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for breast cancer-specific survival showed that node status HR 4.69 (1.50 to 14.72), tumor size HR 3.18 (0.90 to 11.26) and axillary radiotherapy HR 1.99 (0.69 to 5.75) had statistically significant effect on breast cancer mortality. Log-rank (54.21 p < 0.001) analysis showed significant difference for overall survival among women with a axillary recurrence based on different cancer stages. Tumor size and node status were the most important prognostic factors in women with axillary recurrence.

Paradigm Shift of Staging and Treatment for Early Breast Cancer in the Sentinel Lymph Node Era

Lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for the clinical outcome of patients with most solid cancers. Because it is the first node draining the primary cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is most likely to harbor metastatic cancer cells. The tumor size of primary breast cancer is highly correlated with SLN metastasis. If the SLN is negative, the negative predictive value of the remaining nodal basin exceeds 95%. It appears that even using different techniques from different institutions, the successful rate to harvest the SLN is more than 95%. The false-negative rate is about 5-10% in most series. Breast cancer patients with early detection and a negative SLN have a significantly improved survival rate. The SLN data in breast cancer is so convincing that SLN information has been incorporated into the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of breast cancer. The therapeutic value of additional lymph node dissection after a positive SLN for breast cancer is still controversial. Follow-up data from breast cancer patients is somewhat limited, but available information shows that patients with negative SLNs fare much better. In summary, several important patterns of metastasis can be established based on the current SLN experience: 1) The earlier the breast cancer is found, the less the metastatic potential. 2) In most cases, breast cancer follows an orderly progression of metastasis to the SLN. 3) A small subgroup of patients may develop systemic dissemination without SLN involvement. Since metastatic cancer is usually incurable, it is important for oncologists to detect and resect an early breast cancer without delay. The challenge in the future will be to dissect these different patterns of metastasis based on molecular or genetic markers. Such information will be critical to select high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Current Controversies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced the routine level I and II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for women with clinically node-negative T1 and T2 breast cancer. Studies have shown that SLNB is highly predictive of axillary nodal status with a false-negative of rate less than 10%. Our purpose was to address some of the ongoing controversies about this procedure, including technical issues, use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, internal mammary lymph node biopsy, criteria for patient selection (in intraductal carcinoma?), its staging accuracy, and the clinical approach when a SLNB was found to be negative or positive on pathologic examination. After the revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer in 2002, the evaluation of internal mammary lymph nodes and determination of micrometastases by hematoxylin-eosin or by immunohistochemistry have become increasingly important in staging of patients. Recent guideline recommendations developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel in 2005 are also discussed. Long-term follow-up results of ongoing studies will provide more accurate assessment of the prognostic significance of SLNB and its value in the prevention of breast cancer-related morbidity in axillary staging compared to ALND.

Histopathologic Examination of the Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the most likely site of regional metastasis. Their step sectioning and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) result in the upstaging of breast cancer. The heterogeneity of histologic methods is partially responsible for differences in nodal upstaging of the disease in different reports. Intraoperative assessment might be done by both frozen sections and imprint cytology; both methods have advantages and disadvantages. Several guidelines relating to the histopathology of sentinel nodes, including the recent European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology guidelines, are briefly summarized. These latter advocate multilevel assessment of grossly or intraoperatively negative sentinel nodes with levels separated by a maximum of 1 mm and allow IHC in their assessment, although this latter method is not mandatory. Both methods of intraoperative evaluation are allowable. There are also minimum requirements for the reports on sentinel node histology. For example, the reports should include the extent of nodal involvement, the method used for their identification, and preferably the method used for investigating the sentinel nodes, even if the results are negative. These guidelines are intended to form the basis for national guidelines in European countries.

Reasons for failure to identify positive sentinel nodes in breast cancer patients with significant nodal involvement

AIM

To analyse causes of failure of sentinel node (SN) procedures in breast cancer patients and assess the role of pre-operative ultrasound examination of the axilla.

METHODS

In 138 consecutive clinically node negative breast cancer patients with the primary tumour in situ a SN procedure with radiolabeled colloid and blue dye was performed. Radioactivity in the SN was scored as inadequate or adequate. The axillary lymph node dissection scored for number of involved nodes and presence of extranodal growth.

RESULTS

In 53/138 patients, the SN was positive for tumour. Full axillary node dissection revealed that 58/138 were node positive. So in five patients the SN failed to predict true nodal status. In 3/5, the radioactive ratio (SN vs background) was inadequate. All were found to have extensive nodal involvement. The radioactivity ratio was inadequate in 37/138 patients. This ratio was inadequate in 10 of 15 patients with > or =4 positive nodes and 27 of 123 in patients with 0-3 positive nodes (p < 0.001). If extranodal growth was present the radioactive ratio was inadequate in 13 of 18 patients, whilst this was only the case in 24 of 120 patients without extranodal growth or metastases (p < 0.001). Ultrasound (US) examination and US-guided FNAC was able to pre-operatively identify 16 of the 26 patients with four or more metastases in the axilla.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive nodal involvement is an important cause of failure of the sentinel node biopsy. Pre-operative ultrasound examination of the axilla can avoid this in almost two thirds of these patients.

Use of lymphoscintigraphy defines lymphatic drainage patterns before sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) can identify lymphatic drainage patterns before sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is performed in patients with early-stage breast cancer, but the importance of extraaxillary SLNs seen on LSG is unknown. We assessed whether drainage patterns seen on LSG were associated with histologic findings in axillary SLNs recovered at SLN biopsy.

STUDY DESIGN

From a prospectively maintained database, we identified 1,201 clinically node-negative patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative LSG and axillary SLN biopsy. Patient and tumor characteristics, LSG results, and final SLN pathology results were examined.

RESULTS

LSG showed drainage to internal mammary (IM) nodes in 1.6% of patients, axillary nodes in 68.1%, both IM and axillary nodes in 19.8%, and no drainage in 10.3%. Drainage to IM nodes was observed for tumors in all quadrants of the breast. Patients with IM drainage had a younger median age than patients without IM drainage (51.8 versus 58.3 years, respectively; p < 0.001). The intraoperative axillary SLN identification rate was higher when axillary drainage was observed on LSG than when it was not observed (98.7% versus 93.0%, respectively; p < 0.001), but the LSG drainage pattern was not associated with pathologic status of the SLN or number of metastatic SLNs. At a median followup of 32 months, 4 patients had regional nodal recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-fourth of patients had lymphatic drainage to the extraaxillary lymph nodes, particularly the IM nodes, seen on LSG. Extraaxillary drainage seen on LSG did not preclude identification of axillary SLNs at operation. Longterm followup of patients with lymphoscintigraphic evidence of extraaxillary drainage is needed to determine whether regional and systemic recurrence patterns differ in these patients.

Intraoperative Palpation for Clinically Suspicious Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes Reduces the False-Negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is widely used to identify the first lymph node draining breast tumors. When the sentinel lymph node is free of metastasis, axillary dissection is avoided because the rest of the nodes are expected to be negative as well. A false-negative rate of 5% is considered acceptable. In the case of a false-negative SLNB, adjuvant local and systemic treatments might be suboptimal. We assessed the effect of intraoperative axillary palpation for clinically suspicious lymph nodes that are not otherwise detected by radioactive tracer or blue dye on the false-negative rate of SLNB in breast cancer patients. Our prospective database of patients having surgery for primary invasive breast cancer and who had a SLNB from 2000 to 2004 was reviewed. Only patients with clinically negative nodes preoperatively were included. The procedure included preoperative injection of radiotracer, with dye injection as backup, and intraoperative palpation of the axilla for suspicious lymph nodes that were not radioactive or blue. Of the 290 patients, 89 (30.7%) had sentinel node involvement by tumor. Seven patients had clinically suspicious nodes identified solely by palpation and not by tracer, in addition to sentinel lymph nodes detected by tracer. In five of the seven patients, the nodes harbored metastasis. In four of these five patients (4.5% of the 89 patients with axillary involvement), the palpable nodes were the only ones involved. A generous axillary incision and systematic palpation of the axilla reduces the false-negative rate and should be a part of the SLNB procedure.

Properties and characteristics of the dyes injected to assist axillary sentinel node localization in breast surgery

AIMS

A review of the safety profile of dyes injected to assist in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was performed of the medline database 1966-2005 using the Ovid web Gateway detailing the words sentinel node, breast cancer, allergic reactions, blue dye, isosulfan blue, patent blue and methylene blue.

RESULTS

There are reported side-effects from the parenteral administration of dyes, which range from minor to life threatening in severity. There are differences between the dyes as regards their effects. These aspects are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Many dyes have been used for SLNB with acceptable identification rates. There are variable side-effects for each of those dyes. Further research is needed to clarify the safety profile of these dyes.

Results of sentinel node biopsy not affected by previous excisional biopsy

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy has been validated in the treatment of breast carcinoma. Patients with previous excisional biopsy are regarded as ineligible for SN biopsy. We evaluated the results of SN biopsy for this group of patients based on confirmatory axillary lymph node dissection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April 1997 all 88 patients with stage T(1-3) breast cancer who had previously undergone diagnostic excisional biopsy followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection, were enrolled into a prospective study to determine the validity of the sentinel node procedure.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy visualized one or more axillary hot spots in 84/88 patients. A successful SN biopsy was performed in 87 patients. Complete axillary lymph-node dissection showed no false-negative SN biopsy among the 87 SN procedures.

CONCLUSION

SN biopsy is a reliable and safe method following excisional biopsy as is confirmed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. Therefore, patients with previous excisional biopsy are eligible for sentinel node procedure and can be spared unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection.

Axillary Ultrasonography to Detect Recurrence After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for breast cancer has a false-negative rate of approximately 5%. Initial reports of follow-up show lower axillary recurrence rates than expected. We performed axillary ultrasonography to determine whether occult recurrences could be detected.

METHODS

In a community hospital setting, 289 patients who had SNB for breast cancer in a single surgeon's practice underwent axillary examination by the surgeon followed by axillary ultrasonography by a dedicated breast radiologist. Ultrasonography was performed one time from 4 to 79 months (median, 25 months) after surgery. Five patients with suspicious nodes had ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, and one had a core biopsy.

RESULTS

No patient had suspicious nodes on clinical examination. Only six patients had ultrasound findings that warranted intervention. Five patients had benign cytological characteristics, and one had a benign core biopsy result. No evidence of axillary recurrence was found in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary ultrasonography did not detect occult metastases in any patient and is not recommended for routine follow-up after SNB. The lack of ultrasound evidence of metastasis suggests that the recurrence rate is likely to remain low.

A preclinical study of prostate sentinel lymph node mapping with [99mTC]diethylenetetramine pentaacetic acid-mannosyl-dextran

PURPOSE

SLN identification could improve the pathological staging of prostate cancer. Prior SLN studies have been compromised by delayed radiotracer uptake rates and significant diffusion rates out of the sentinel nodes. Lymphoseek is a new radiopharmaceutical specifically designed for SLN mapping. It shows rapid and sustained SLN uptake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the use of Lymphoseek for prostate SLN mapping by measuring SLN uptake in 12 anesthetized pigs. The prostate was injected with 0.05 ml of a 1:1 volume per volume mixture of Lymphazurin and 1.0 mCi Lymphoseek (1 nmole). Within 5 to 19 minutes the pelvic lymph nodes were dissected and assayed with a gamma probe. A lymph node was considered a sentinel node if it had count rates that exceeded 10 times the background count. We calculated the percent of injected dose of each lymph node excised and the prostate gland.

RESULTS

A total of 35 SLNs were identified in the 12 studies. Of the SLNs 81% were located outside of the obturator fossa in this pig model. The SLN percent of injected dose was 0.05% to 7.75% (mean +/- 1 SD 1.74% +/- 1.92%). The mean percent of injected dose in the prostate was 27% +/- 12%. There was no correlation between the side of SLN and the lobe injected.

CONCLUSIONS

After prostate administration of Lymphoseek pelvic SLNs attain high signal-to-background ratios within 10 minutes. This property should permit intraoperative injection and SLN mapping without significantly adding to the duration of prostatectomy. A phase I clinical trial has been initiated, which will later incorporate minimally invasive techniques.