Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

Proximal tubal occlusion first or oocyte retrieval first for patients with hydrosalpinx?

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to investigate the best time to manage hydrosalpinx to improve pregnancy outcomes during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

METHODS

Patients with hydrosalpinx who received IVF treatment were analyzed retrospectively. And two groups were included to compare the effects of different timing treatment of hydrosalpinx on IVF pregnancy outcomes, "Proximal Tubal Occlusion First Group" (Group Ligation-COH) and "Oocyte Retrieval First Group" (Group COH-Ligation). The main outcome measures included: ovarian response indexes, laboratory indexes and clinical pregnancy outcomes. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed for outcome indicators, and the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used.

RESULTS

A total of 1490 patients were included (n = 976 Ligation-COH and n = 514 COH-Ligation). The Gn starting dose and MII rate in group Ligation-COH were significantly higher than those in group COH-Ligation (203.33 ± 58.20 vs. 203.33 ± 58.20, 81.58% vs. 80.28%, P < 0.05). The number of oocytes obtained and the number of available D3 embryos in group COH-Ligation were higher than those in group Ligation-COH (15.10 ± 7.58 vs. 13.45 ± 6.42, 10.92 ± 5.81 vs. 9.94 ± 5.15, P < 0.05). Although the number of ET cycles per IVF cycle in group COH-Ligation was higher than that in group Ligation-COH (1.88 ± 1.00 vs. 1.48 ± 0.70, P < 0.05), the biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate in group Ligation-COH were significantly higher than those in group COH-Ligation (60.83% vs. 46.27% for biochemical pregnancy, 55.69% vs. 38.5% for clinical pregnancy, 26.18% vs. 17.74% for multiple pregnancy, 47.08% vs. 25.26% for live birth, 69.47% vs. 47.47% for cumulative live birth, P < 0.05), and the miscarriage rate in group Ligation-COH was lower than that in group COH-Ligation (10.47% vs. 17.20 for early abortion, 4.49% vs. 15.86% for late abortion, P < 0.05). In logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for age and multiple factors, the above results were still statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). For elderly patients, the clinical pregnancy rate, multiple birth rate and live birth rate in group Ligation-COH were also higher than those in group COH-Ligation (P < 0.001). No significant differences were detected for patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

CONCLUSIONS

For the choice of ligation operation time, we recommend that patients choose tubal ligation first and then ovulation induction and oocyte retrieval treatment.

Comparisons of different treatment outcomes in IVF/ET patients with hydrosalpinx: a retrospective study

AIMS

To explore suggestions for clinicians on the most effective treatment for hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 936 women with hydrosalpinx and 6715 tubal infertile women without hydrosalpinx who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 2014 and August 2019 in our center. Hydrosalpinx patients received different treatments including laparoscopic surgery (only salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion/ligation were included), ultrasonic-guided aspiration and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion. Outcomes were analyzed by One-way ANOVA, Chi-Square test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

The live birth rate (LBR) of laparoscopic surgery was significantly higher compared with hydrosalpinx aspiration (48.3% vs 39.6%, p = .024). The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of subsequent laparoscopic surgery was significantly higher compared with subsequent hysteroscopic occlusion (65.1% vs 34.1%, p = .001) and no subsequent treatment (65.1% vs 44.9%, p  <  .005). Subsequent laparoscopic surgery significantly improved the CLBR of hydrosalpinx patients who received ultrasonic-guided aspiration and didn't get clinical pregnancy in fresh cycles (Odds Ratio (OR) =1.875; 95%CI = 1.041-3.378, p = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery leads to significantly higher LBR than ultrasonic-guided aspiration and significantly higher CLBR than hysteroscopic occlusion and no treatment.

The influence of timing of oocytes retrieval and embryo transfer on the IVF-ET outcomes in patients having bilateral salpingectomy due to bilateral hydrosalpinx

Objective

The objective of the study was to investigate whether the sequence of oocyte retrieval and salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx affects pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients.

Study Design

There were 1,610 bilateral hydrosalpinx patients who underwent laparoscopy salpingectomy and IVF-ET/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) from January 2009 to December 2018. They were divided into two groups: oocyte retrieval first group: 235 accepted oocyte retrieval before salpingectomy; operation first group: 1,375 accepted oocyte retrieval after salpingectomy. The basic information and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared. The pregnancy outcomes and influencing factors were analyzed among patients at different starting times of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) or oocyte retrieval after the salpingectomy.

Results

Patients in the oocyte retrieval first group had higher levels of basal follicle stimulating hormone and lower anti-Mullerian hormone levels (P < 0.05). There were no cases of pelvic infection or oocyte and embryo contamination after oocyte retrieval in the oocyte retrieval first group. In the frozen cycle, the clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates of the oocyte retrieval first group were lower than those in the operation first group (P < 0.05), while the live birth rate was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The live birth rates of patients ≥35 years old in the operation first group and the oocyte retrieval first group were not significantly different (29.3% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.240). After adjusting for age and antral follicle count (AFC), oocyte retrieval 4-6 and 7-12 months after the operation had higher accumulated pregnancy rates [OR 1.439 (1.045-1.982), P = 0.026; OR 1.509 (1.055-2.158), P = 0.024] and higher accumulated live birth rates [OR 1.419 (1.018-1.977), P = 0.039; OR 1.544 (1.068-2.230), P = 0.021]. No significant difference was observed in the pregnancy outcomes of frozen embryo transfer at different times after salpingectomy (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

No contamination of the embryo or infection was observed in patients who underwent oocyte retrieval before the operation. The interval between the operation and frozen embryo transfer did not affect the pregnancy outcomes. After adjusting for age and AFC, patients who underwent oocyte retrieval 4-6 and 7-12 months after the operation had higher accumulated pregnancy rates and live birth rates.

Unilateral Partial Absence of the Fallopian Tube in a Female Patient With Infertility: A Case Report and Literature Review

Unilateral partial absence of the fallopian tube is rare, and its clinical importance in fertility is unclear. A 35-year-old nulligravid female patient with infertility was suspected to have a left hydrosalpinx on hysterosalpingography and sonography. Therefore, the patient underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. The left fallopian tube lacked the ampullary portion, and its proximal end had a hydrosalpinx. A left salpingectomy was performed, and the pathological finding was a unilateral partial absence of the ampullary portion of the fallopian tube with hydrosalpinx. Postoperatively, she conceived via in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer-and delivered a healthy baby. Hydrosalpinx is a well-known cause of infertility and can develop due to the partial absence of a fallopian tube. Furthermore, salpingectomy may be effective in improving fertility in female patients with a unilateral partial absence of the fallopian tube.

ART Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion Versus Laparoscopic Salpingectomy for Hydrosalpinx Management in Endometriosis Patients

The objective of this paper is to compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) cumulative live birth rates after hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion and laparoscopic salpingectomy in endometriosis patients, for management of hydrosalpinx. This is an observational cohort study at a university hospital, including all endometriosis patients with hydrosalpinges undergoing ART, between January 2013 and December 2018. The patients underwent either laparoscopic salpingectomy or hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion with Essure® when laparoscopy was not an option (extensive pelvic adhesions at exploratory laparoscopy or a history of multiple abdominal surgeries with frozen pelvis). The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Endometriosis patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by hysterosalpingography and/or TVUS and/or MRI were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate. A total of 104 patients were included in the study; 74 underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy and 30 underwent proximal tubal occlusion with Essure®. The Essure® group had longer infertility durations (58.9 ± 30.0 months vs. 39.5 ± 19.1 months, p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of associated adenomyosis (76.7% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001) than the salpingectomy group. The cumulative live birth rate was 56.6% after 44 ART cycles in the Essure® group and 40.5% after 99 ART cycles in the salpingectomy group (p = 0.13). In a population of endometriosis patients undergoing ART, women treated by Essure® for management of hydrosalpinx have similar cumulative live birth rates as women treated by laparoscopic salpingectomy.