Adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node dissection in pancreatic cancer treated with surgery and chemotherapy

Current Treatment of Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Medical Oncologist's Perspective

Pancreatic cancer has traditionally been associated with a dismal prognosis, even in early stages of the disease. In recent years, the introduction of newer generation chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting has improved the survival of patients treated with upfront resection. However, there are multiple theoretical advantages to deliver early systemic therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. So far, the evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The benefit of this treatment sequence for patients with resectable disease remains elusive. In this review, we summarize the data on adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and describe which evidence backs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, we address important issues faced in clinical practice when treating patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in resected stage I to II pancreatic cancer: A propensity-adjusted analysis

BACKGROUND

The survival time of patients with early pancreatic cancer (PC) is still disappointing, even after surgical resection. PC has an extremely poor prognosis. Herein, we aimed to investigate the survival effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on resected stage I to II PC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A large eligible sample of patients was identified from 2010 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of PORT. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias and to make the groups comparable.

RESULTS

A total of 3219 patients with resected stage I to II PC was included after rigid screening. The median overall survival (OS) was 26 months with PORT (n = 1055) versus 21 months with non-PORT (n = 2164) before matching (p<0.001). By multivariable analysis, PORT remained a favorable prognostic predictor for OS. In PSM analysis, receiving PORT was associated with improved OS (median, 26 months vs. 23 months; at 2 years, 51.7% vs. 46.7%; at 5 years, 23.3% vs. 17.4% (P = 0.006). After further meticulous exploration, only the stage IIB subgroup benefited from PORT (p<0.001). This result was due to the positive lymph node state (N+), whose mortality risk was cut by 23.4% (p<0.001) by PORT.

CONCLUSION

Addition of PORT to the treatment of patients with resected stage I to II PC conveys a survival benefit, particularly among those with N-positive or stage IIB disease.

The Value of Total Lymph Nodes Examined and Number of Positive Lymph Nodes in Determining the Role of Adjuvant Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the survival benefits by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in pancreatic cancer patients with different total lymph nodes examined (TNE), number of positive lymph nodes (NPN), and lymph nodes ratio (LNR).

METHODS

National Cancer Database was queried for nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer patients from 2004 to 2015. Cox models were utilized. Interaction terms were applied to evaluate the effect of RT in different NPN, LNR, and margin strata. Multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 19,759 patients identified, 10,910 patients qualified. Compared with TNE of 1 to 9, TNE of 10 to 14, 15 to 19, 20 to 24, and 25 or greater had progressive overall survival (OS) benefits. Adjuvant RT had similar OS benefits among them. In negative margin patients, adjuvant RT improved OS when NPN was 2 to 3 (hazards ratio [HR], 0.84; P = 0.01) or LNR was 0.15 to 0.25 (HR, 0.79; P = 0.002). In positive margin patients, adjuvant RT nonsignificantly improved OS when NPN was 1 to 3 (HR, 0.89; P = 0.36) or when NPN was 4 or greater (HR, 0.79; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher TNE correlates with better survival. Adjuvant RT may not compensate for inadequate lymph node dissection. Adjuvant RT improves survival in negative-margin patients with 2 to 3 positive lymph nodes or LNR of 0.15 to 0.25.

Outcome of head compared to body and tail pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93 studies

Background

Even when resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with a dismal prognosis. Initial presentation varies according with primary tumor location. Aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognosis associated with site (head versus body/tail) in patients with PC.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar, LILACS, and CINAHL databases from inception to March 2018. Studies reporting information on the independent prognostic role of site in PC and comparing overall survival (OS) in head versus body/tail tumors were selected. Data were aggregated using hazard ratios (HRs) for OS of head versus body/tail PC according to fixed- or random-effect model.

Results

A total of 93 studies including 254,429 patients were identified. Long-term prognosis of head was better than body/tail cancers (HR =0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99; P=0.02). A pooled HR of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P=0.02) from multivariate analysis only (n=77 publications) showed that head site was an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

Primary tumor location in the head of the pancreas at the time of diagnosis is a predictor of better survival. Such indicator should be acknowledged when designing future studies, in particular in the operable and neoadjuvant setting.

Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Recommendations of the Working Group of the Polish Pancreatic Club

These recommendations refer to the current management in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a neoplasia characterised by an aggressive course and extremely poor prognosis. The recommendations regard diagnosis, surgical, adjuvant and palliative treatment, with consideration given to endoscopic and surgical methods. A vast majority of the statements are based on data obtained in clinical studies and experts' recommendations on PDAC management, including the following guidelines: International Association of Pancreatology/European Pancreatic Club (IAP/EPC), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Polish Society of Gastroenterology (PSG) and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). All recommendations were voted on by members of the Working Group of the Polish Pancreatic Club. Results of the voting and brief comments are provided with each recommendation.

Association Between Very Small Tumor Size and Decreased Overall Survival in Node-Positive Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

In pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), increasing tumor size usually correlates with a worse prognosis. However, patients with a very small primary tumor who experience lymph node involvement may have a different disease biology. This study sought to determine the interaction between tumor size and lymph node involvement in terms of overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The study identified 17,073 patients with a diagnosis of M0 resected PDAC between 1983 and 2013 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were stratified by lymph node involvement (N0 vs N+) and T stage (T1a-T1b vs T1c vs T2 vs T3 vs T4). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, and Cox regression analysis was used to compare survival between subgroups after adjustment for patient-specific factors.

RESULTS

Lymph node involvement and T stage significantly interacted (p < 0.001). Among the patients with node-negative disease, 5-year OS decreased monotonically with increasing T stage (59.1%, 30.6%, 22.9%, 16.6%, and 8.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). In contrast, among the patients with node-positive disease, those with T1a-T1b tumors (< 10 mm) had worse 5-year OS than those with T1c tumors (7.4% vs 17.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.97; p = 0.034) and similar survival compared with those who had T2, T3, or T4 tumors (9.7%, 8.2%, and 4.8%, respectively; p > 0.2 in all cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with lymph node-positive PDAC, very small primary tumors are associated with decreased OS. This finding raises the possibility that small tumors capable of lymph node metastasis might represent more biologically aggressive cancers.

Prognostic value of retrieved lymph node counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to find out the prognostic value and optimal cut-off value of retrieved lymph node (LN) counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to screen out patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The cut-off number of retrieved LNs was determined by the X-tile programme. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 778 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (2004-2014) met the inclusion criteria for this research, and there were 403 patients without LN metastases (N0) among them. The cut-off numbers of retrieved LNs, which were determined using the X-tile programme, were 8 and 18. Both results of univariate and multivariate survival analyses in N0 patients showed that patients with ≥18 retrieved LNs had a significantly better survival rate than patients with 1-7 retrieved LNs and patients with 8-17 retrieved LNs. In the subgroup of patients with early-stage tumours, patients with at least 13 retrieved LNs had a significantly better overall and cancer-specific survival than patients with fewer retrieved LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

The retrieved LN counts are an independent prognostic factor for patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with at least 18 retrieved LNs had a better overall and cancer-specific survival than patients with fewer retrieved LNs. The minimum requirement for retrieving of LNs should reach 18 in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Adjuvant therapeutic strategies for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Of all patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, only 15-20% present with resectable disease. Despite curative-intent resection, the prognosis remains poor with the majority of patients recurring, prompting the need for adjuvant therapy. Historical data support the use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine, but recent data suggest either gemcitabine plus capecitabine or modified FOLFIRINOX can improve overall survival when compared to gemcitabine alone. The use of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy remains controversial, primarily due to limitations in study design and mixed results of historical trials. The ongoing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-0848 trial hopes to further define the role of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and adjuvant immunotherapy represent additional possibilities to improve outcomes, but evidence supporting their use is limited. This article reviews adjuvant therapeutic strategies for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy, chemoradiation therapy, IORT and immunotherapy.

Nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer : Improved survival with chemoradiotherapy > 40 Gy after systemic treatment

Purpose

The role of radiotherapy (RT) for nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer is still a matter of debate since randomized control trials have shown inconsistent results. The current retrospective single-institution study includes both resected and unresected patients with nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. The aim is to analyze overall survival (OS) after irradiation combined with induction chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

Of the 73 patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer eligible for the present analysis, 42 (58%) patients had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while 31 (42%) received CRT as primary treatment. In all, 65 (89%) had chemotherapy at any time before, during, or after RT, and 39 (53%) received concomitant CRT. The median total dose was 50 Gy (range 12–77 Gy), while 61 (84%) patients received >40 Gy.

Results

With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1.2–179.8 months), 14 (19%) are still alive and 59 (81%) of the patients have died, whereby 51 (70%) were cancer-related deaths. Median OS and the 2‑year survival rate were 22.9 months (1.2–179.8 months) and 44%, respectively. In addition, 61 (84%) patients treated with >40 Gy had a survival advantage (median OS 23.7 vs. 17.3 months, p = 0.026), as had patients with 4 months minimum of systemic treatment (median OS 27.5 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.0004).

Conclusion

CRT with total doses >40 Gy after induction chemotherapy leads to improved OS in patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-018-1281-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Survival benefits from postoperative radiation therapy on lymph node positive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The benefit of combining postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) with chemotherapy for resected patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is controversial. We sought to determine the effects of PORT on survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent primary site surgery. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving primary tumor surgery between 1988 and 2012 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We estimated the association between PORT and other clinicopathologic factors and survival. In total, 5304 patients were identified who underwent pancreatic resection including 2093 patients who had PORT and 3211 patients who had no PORT. Median overall, cancer-specific, and other-cause survival were 19.0, 20.0, and 196.0 months, respectively, with PORT versus 14.0, 15.0, and 163.0 months, respectively, without PORT (all P < 0.001). Subset analysis revealed that the benefit of PORT was limited to patients with N1 disease. Median overall, cancer-specific, and other-cause survival for patients with N1 disease were 18.0, 18.0, and NA months, respectively, with PORT versus 12.0, 13.0, and 154.0 months, respectively, without PORT (all P < 0.001). Regardless the number of positive lymph node count (PLN) and lymph node ratio (LNR), PORT was always associated with increased survival on multivariate analysis in patients with N1 disease (all P < 0.001). In summary, survival benefits might be obtained from PORT on lymph node positive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Is Neoadjuvant Therapy Sufficient in Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients? A National Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment, the question of whether preoperatively treated, successfully resected patients should receive additional postoperative adjuvant treatment remains unanswered. We evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer patients in a large national study.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Data Base between 2006 and 2013 to identify resected, non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who received neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy followed by pancreatectomy. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to compare survival between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 1357 patients were identified. Of the patients, 38.6% (n = 524) were treated with postoperative therapy. There was no difference in unadjusted median overall survival between patients who did and did not receive postoperative therapy (median survival, 27.5 vs. 27.1 months, log-rank p = 0.5409). Postoperative therapy was not significantly associated with favorable prognosis in patients with positive resection margins (log-rank p = 0.6452) or positive lymph nodes (log-rank p = 0.6252). On multivariate analysis, receipt of postoperative therapy was not predictive of survival (hazard ratio 0.972; 95% CI 0.848-1.115; p = 0.6876).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results using national data suggest that after receipt of neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy, additional postoperative therapy may not provide additional survival benefit. These data warrant further prospective data collection and consideration for clinical trials.

Prognostic value of resected lymph nodes numbers for Siewert II gastroesophageal junction cancer

We aim to evaluate whether resected lymph nodes (RLNs) numbers have prognostic value in patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers (GEJ, Siewert type II). Patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 1988 to 2013. Multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan–Meier method were performed to analyze risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival(CSS). A total of 8396 patients who underwent surgeries and had reginal lymph nodes examined were identified. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that more numbers of resected lymph nodes (RLNs) were associated with better survival. The five-year OS rates for 1–20 and 21–90 RLNs were 26.8% and 32.4%, with a median survival time of 62 and 72 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The five-year CSS rates were 32.2% and 37.2% in each group, with median survival time of 90 and 101 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that year of diagnosis, age, sex, marital status, grade, seer histology, tumor histology, lymph node ratio (LNR) and RLNs as a categorical variable were all significant prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. RLN count is an independent prognostic factor for Siewert type II GEJ cancer patients and patients can achieve better overall and cancer-specific survival with more than 20 RLNs dissected.

Synthesis, crystal structure and activity evaluation of novel 3,4-dihydro-1-benzoxepin-5(2H)-one derivatives as protein-tyrosine kinase (PTK) inhibitors

Four new 3,4-dihydro-1-benzoxepin-5(2H)-one derivatives, namely (E)-4-(5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzylidene)-6,8-dimethoxy-3,4-dihydrobenzo[b]oxepin-5(2H)-one, (7), (E)-4-[(E)-3-(5-bromo-2-hydroxyphenyl)allylidene]-6,8-dimethoxy-3,4-dihydrobenzo[b]oxepin-5(2H)-one, (8), (E)-4-(5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzylidene)-6-hydroxy-8-methoxy-3,4-dihydrobenzo[b]oxepin-5(2H)-one, C₁₈H₁₅BrO₅, (9), and (E)-4-[(E)-3-(5-bromo-2-hydroxyphenyl)allylidene]-6-hydroxy-8-methoxy-3,4-dihydrobenzo[b]oxepin-5(2H)-one, (10), have been synthesized and characterized by FT-IR, NMR and MS. The structure of (9) was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Crystal structure analysis shows that molecules of (9) are connected into a one-dimensional chain in the [010] direction through classical hydrogen bonds and these chains are further extended into a three-dimensional network via C-H...O interactions. The inhibitory activities of these compounds against protein-tyrosine kinases (PTKs) show that 6-hydroxy-substituted compounds (9) and (10) are more effective for inhibiting ErbB1 and ErbB2 than are 6-methoxy-substituted compounds (7) and (8). This may be because (9) and (10) could effectively bind to the active pockets of the protein through intermolecular interactions.

Improved Survival in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Carcinoma Using Postoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Regional Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND We assessed the role of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in combination with chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinomas after curative resection and identified prognostic factors related to pancreatic carcinoma after multidisciplinary treatment strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pancreatic carcinoma patients (n=61) who received adjuvant radiotherapy after resection (median dose, 50.4 Gy) between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. Sixty patients received chemotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), systemic chemotherapy, and regional intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (RIAC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Log-rank univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression model analysis were used to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 25.5 (range, 4.9-59.7) months. The 3-year OS and DFS rates were 31.0% and 16.1%, respectively. The median OS and DFS were 27.4 and 16.7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that independent favorable predictors for OS were CCRT (p=0.039) and postoperative RIAC (p=0.044). Moreover, postoperative RIAC (p=0.027), and pre-radiotherapy CA19-9 ≤37 U/mL (p=0.0080) were independent favorable predictors for DFS. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy was tolerated well by the patients, and no treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS Combined IMRT and adjuvant chemotherapy appeared safe and effective for pancreatic carcinoma. CCRT was associated with improved survival with acceptable toxicity. We propose that radiotherapy could be a part of postoperative treatment, but it should be administered concurrently with chemotherapy. Adding RIAC was associated with improved OS and DFS and it could be integrated into the postoperative treatment regimen.

Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme

BACKGROUND

The role of routine lymphadenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is still controversial and no study has defined the minimum number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE). We sought to assess the prognostic performance of American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (7(th) edition) N stage, lymph node ratio, and log odds (LODDS; logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and identify the optimal TNLE to accurately stage patients.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was queried to identify 437 patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 1995 and 2014. The prognostic abilities of the lymph node staging systems were assessed using the Harrell's c-index. A Bayesian model was developed to identify the minimum TNLE.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-eight (36.2%) patients had lymph node metastasis. Median TNLE was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 7). The LODDS had a slightly better prognostic performance than lymph node ratio and American Joint Committee on Cancer, in particular among patients with <4 TNLE (c-index = 0.568). For 2 TNLE, the Bayesian model showed a poor discriminatory ability to distinguish patients with favorable and poor prognosis. When TNLE was >2, the hazard ratio for N1 patients was statistically significant and the hazard ratio for N1 patients increased from 1.51 with 4 TNLE to 2.10 with 10 TNLE. Although the 5-year overall survival of N1 patients was only slightly affected by TNLE, the 5-year overall survival of N0 patients increased significantly with TNLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing radical resection should ideally have at least 4 lymph nodes harvested to be accurately staged. In addition, although LODDS performed better at determining prognosis among patients with <4 TNLE, both lymph node ratio and LODDS outperformed compared with American Joint Committee on Cancer N stage among patients with ≥4 TNLE.

Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4% patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node-positive patients. However, in node-negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3 ≤ total lymph node count (TLNC) ≤ 12 and TLNC < 3 (5-year overall survival: 52.8% vs 39.7% vs 26.3%, P = 0.001; 5-year cancer-specific survival: 60.6% vs 46.3% vs 30.0%, P = 0.001). No difference in survival between patients with regional and distant node involvement was found. Survival for patients with greater than three positive nodes was significantly worse than that for those with three or less (relative ratio: 1.466, P = 0.001). And patients with LNR > 0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life-threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.

Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer-Population-Based Analysis with Propensity Score Matching

This population-based study evaluated the survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in left-sided pancreatic cancer. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with surgically resected left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2010. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare PORT and non-PORT groups. A total of 445 patients were identified, and PORT was performed in 180 (40 %) patients. In the unmatched population, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) (P = 0.197) and cause-specific survival (CSS) (P = 0.379) between the PORT and non-PORT groups. After propensity score matching, the patients treated with PORT had longer median OS (P = 0.012) and CSS (P = 0.039) than the non-PORT group. In propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis, non-receipt of PORT was a poor prognostic factor in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.79), and CSS (HR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.01-1.71). The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LOODS) (≥-0.73) was also associated with worse OS (P = 0.003) and CSS (P = 0.001). In left-sided pancreatic cancer, considering the addition of PORT is a reasonable option as in pancreatic head cancer. The LOODS was suggested as a strong predictive indicator of the patients' prognoses.

Lymph Node Evaluation for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Its Value as a Quality Metric

BACKGROUND

Adequate lymph node evaluation (LNE) is recommended for surgically treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma because studies have shown an association between improved survival and adequate LNE. This study aimed to understand the mechanism of this association and determine whether LNE is a valuable quality metric.

METHODS

Using the linked Surveillance Epidemiology End Results Medicare database, we identified patients with surgically treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2000 to 2010. Adequate LNE was defined as evaluation of ≥15 nodes. Survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

We identified 2629 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overall, 33 % had adequate LNE. Adequate LNE was significantly associated with receipt of postoperative chemotherapy. A significant decrease in hazard of death was associated with adequate LNE (HR 0.86, p < 0.05). Receipt of postoperative chemotherapy was also significantly associated with decreased hazard of death (HR 0.77, p < 0.05). On unadjusted analysis, the survival benefit associated with adequate LNE was lost when stratified by receipt of postoperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The survival benefit associated with LNE is in part derived from the fact that patients who receive adequate LNE are also more likely to receive chemotherapy. Thus, the use of lymph node counts has limitations as a quality metric.

Impact of adjuvant treatment modalities on survival outcomes in curatively resected pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We examined the impact of adjuvant modalities on resected pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAC).

METHODS

A total of 563 patients who were curatively resected for PAC were retrospectively analyzed between 2003 and 2013.

RESULTS

Of 563 patients, 472 received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) alone, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone, and chemoradiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT-CT) were analyzed. Of the 472 patients, 231 were given CRT-CT, 26 were given CRT, and 215 were given CT. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12 and 19 months, respectively. When CT and CRT-CT groups were compared, there was no significant difference with respect to both RFS and OS, and also there was no difference in RFS and OS among CRT-CT, CT and CRT groups. To further investigate the impact of radiation on subgroups, patients were stratified according to lymph node status and resection margins. In node-positive patients, both RFS and OS were significantly longer in CRT-CT than CT. In contrast, there was no significant difference between groups when patients with node-negative disease or patients with or without positive surgical margins were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of radiation to CT has a survival benefit in patients with node-positive disease following pancreatic resection.

Current status and progress of pancreatic cancer in China

Cancer is currently one of the most important public health problems in the world. Pancreatic cancer is a fatal disease with poor prognosis. As in most other countries, the health burden of pancreatic cancer in China is increasing, with annual mortality rates almost equal to incidence rates. The increasing trend of pancreatic cancer incidence is more significant in the rural areas than in the urban areas. Annual diagnoses and deaths of pancreatic cancer in China are now beyond the number of cases in the United States. GLOBOCAN 2012 estimates that cases in China account for 19.45% (65727/337872) of all newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer and 19.27% (63662/330391) of all deaths from pancreatic cancer worldwide. The population’s growing socioeconomic status contributes to the rapid increase of China’s proportional contribution to global rates. Here, we present an overview of control programs for pancreatic cancer in China focusing on prevention, early diagnosis and treatment. In addition, we describe key epidemiological, demographic, and socioeconomic differences between China and developed countries. Facts including no nationwide screening program for pancreatic cancer, delay in early detection resulting in a late stage at presentation, lack of awareness of pancreatic cancer in the Chinese population, and low investment compared with other cancer types by government have led to backwardness in China’s pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment. Finally, we suggest measures to improve health outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients in China.

Adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: what does the evidence tell us?

The role of adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for pancreas cancer remains unclear. A handful of randomized trials conducted decades of ago ignited a debate that continues today about whether CRT improves survival after surgery. The many flaws in these trials are well described in the literature, which include the use of antiquated radiation delivery techniques and suboptimal doses. Recent prospective randomized data is lacking, and we eagerly await the results the ongoing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0848 trial that is evaluating the utility of high quality adjuvant CRT in resected pancreas cancer patients. Until the results of RTOG 0848 are available we should look to other studies from the modern era to guide adjuvant treatment recommendations. Here we review the current state of the art for adjuvant pancreas CRT with respect to patient selection, radiation techniques, radiation dose, and integration with novel systemic agents.