Statin Use and the Risk of Prostate Cancer in Ischemic Heart Disease Patients in Taiwan

Association between Statin Use and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis

PURPOSE

Numerous studies have produced conflicting findings regarding the efficacy of statins in prostate cancer treatment. Our objective was to examine the correlation between statin usage and clinical outcomes in Taiwanese men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic prostate cancer from the Chang Gung Research Database spanning the years 2007 to 2020. To minimize confounding bias, we employed the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Clinical outcomes were assessed using IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the association between mortality and clinical factors.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 1,716 statin users and 276 non-users. Patients who used statins exhibited a longer median overall survival (85.4 months compared to 58.2 months; p=0.001) and cancer-specific survival (112.6 months compared to 75.7 months; p<0.001) compared to non-users. The median time to the development of castration-resistant status was similar between statin users and non-users (p=0.069). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, after IPTW adjustment, demonstrated that statin use was associated with improved overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that the use of statins following a de novo metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis enhances survival outcomes. However, statins did not appear to delay the onset of castration-resistant status. Further large-scale and long-term studies are warranted to investigate the biological effects of statins in men with prostate cancer.

Association Between Statin Exposure and Incidence and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Observational Studies

It is widely thought that statins have huge therapeutic potential against prostate cancer (PCA). This study aimed to investigate the effect of statin exposure on PCA incidence and prognosis. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies on the association between statin exposure and PCA from inception until July 2022. The primary endpoints were the incidence of PCA and the survival rate. A total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed that exposure to hydrophilic statins was not associated with the incidence of PCA (odds ratio [OR]=0.94, 95% CI=0.88-1.01, P =0.075), while the incidence of PCA was significantly decreased in populations exposed to lipophilic statins compared with the nonexposed group (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.90-0.98, P =0.001), mainly in Western countries (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.91-0.98, P =0.006). Subgroup analysis showed that simvastatin (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.71-0.97, P =0.016) effectively reduced the incidence of PCA. The prognosis of PCA in patients exposed to both hydrophilic (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57, 95% CI=0.49-0.66, P <0.001) and lipophilic (HR=0.65, 95% CI=0.58-0.73, P <0.001) statins were better than in the nonexposed group, and this improvement was more significant in the East than in Western countries. This study demonstrates that statins can reduce the incidence of PCA and improve prognosis, and are affected by population region and statin properties (hydrophilic and lipophilic).

Association of Statin Use with the Risk of Incident Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

With the growth and aging of population, the incidence of prostate cancer will increase year by year, which is bound to bring greater economic burden to the society. There has been greater interest in the anticancer effects of statin in recent years. It is controversial whether statin use is associated with the risk of prostate cancer (PCa). Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to explore the effects of statin use and their duration and cumulative dose on the overall incidence of PCa.

Method

The study was conducted according to the latest guidelines for PRISMA 2020. We searched PubMed and other databases for studies about the association of statin use with the risk of incident prostate cancer between January 1, 1990, and April 11, 2022. Two independent researchers extracted data and evaluated the quality of the studies. R x64 4.1.2 and random-effects model were used for data statistics. Relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR) effective values with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to assess the main results.

Results

The results of 6 RCT and 26 cohort studies showed that statins did not significantly associate with the incidence of PCa (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.08). The similar results were obtained from 9 case-control studies (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07). However, statins were associated with a lower risk of Pca (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.28-0.70) when the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) was high. Using statins for more than five years could be associated with a reduced incidence of Pca (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23-0.97). There was a significant heterogeneity in these studies (RCT and cohort study: I ² = 98%, P < 0.01; case-control study: I ² = 72%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

We concluded that statins had a neutral association with the overall risk of PCa. High cDDD and long duration were associated with a lower risk of PCa.

The Association of Prediagnostic Statin Use with Aggressive Prostate Cancer from the Multiethnic Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence supporting the protective effect of statins on the risk of prostate cancer, in particular aggressive disease. Past research has mostly been conducted in North American cohorts of White men.

METHODS

In the multiethnic cohort (MEC), we investigated the association of prediagnostic statin use with the incidence and mortality of prostate cancer across five racial/ethnic groups (White, African American, Japanese American, Latino, and Native Hawaiian).

RESULTS

Among 31,062 male participants who completed a detailed medication questionnaire, 31.4% reported use of statins, 2,748 developed prostate cancer, and 261 died from the disease. After adjusting for potential confounders, prediagnostic statin use was associated with a 32% lower risk of fatal prostate cancer [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.50-0.91], with the inverse association suggested consistently across the five racial/ethnic groups. Moreover, an 11% lower risk of aggressive prostate cancer (95% CI = 0.76-1.03) was observed in statin users than in nonusers. We found no statistically significant association between prediagnostic statin use and total prostate cancer or nonaggressive disease. Prediagnostic statin use was suggestively associated with a 19% reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality (95% CI = 0.59-1.10) and an 8% reduction in all-cause mortality (95% CI = 0.79-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In the MEC, prediagnostic use of statin was associated with lower risks of aggressive forms of prostate cancer.

IMPACT

Our findings provide further support for the potential benefits of statins in reducing the risk and mortality of prostate cancer, especially aggressive disease.

Association of statins use and mortality outcomes in prostate cancer patients who received androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

While several recent studies investigated the influence of statins on survival outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), definitive conclusions are still missing. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to develop an overarching framework for the association of statins use and survival outcomes in PCa patients who receive ADT.

Material and methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature assessing the survival outcomes for statin compared to non-statin users in PCa patients who received ADT. We searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies published before March 1, 2021. We used the random effect model in the presence of heterogeneity and the fixed-effects model in the absence of heterogeneity per the I² statistic. We did two meta-analyses; the primary meta-analysis was accomplished for articles reporting cancer-specific survival (CSS) as an outcome. A secondary meta-analysis was completed for articles reporting overall survival (OS) as an outcome.

Results

Ten studies were eligible for inclusion. Nine studies included in the first meta-analysis comprising 136,285 patients showed no statistically significant difference in CSS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.49–1.21) between statin users and non-users in PCa patients who received ADT. In four studies included in the second meta-analysis comprising 95,032 patients, statin users had a significantly better OS compared to non-users (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.62–0.73).

Conclusions

Although the combination of statins and ADT in PCa patients significantly improves OS, it seems not to be through an effect on cancer-specific factors.

Effect of Statins on the Risk of Different Stages of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article was to investigate the relationship between statins and the risk of different stages or grades of prostate cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed for articles published until December 18, 2020, on the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were then analyzed using the STATA.16.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 588,055 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. We found that the use of statins expressed a significant correlation with a lower risk of advanced prostate cancer (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91; RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.99, respectively). However, no evidence suggested that the use of statins was beneficial for the prevention of localized prostate cancer incidence. Similarly, the pooled results also revealed no association between the use of statins and the risk of high-grade and low-grade prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION

It has been found that the use of statins is associated with a lower risk of advanced prostate cancer but was not related to the risk of localized, low-grade, or high-grade prostate cancer.

Statins use and the prognosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies regarding the prognostic value of statin on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients showed various results.

METHODS

Articles regarding the prognostic value of statin on CRC and published in English and before October 2020 were searched in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar. The multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed to explore associations between statins use and overall mortality or cancer-specific mortality of CRC.

RESULTS

The study included 5 retrospective case-control studies (including 475 statins users and 1925 no-statin users) and 11 prospective cohort studies (including 40659 statins users and 344459 no-statin users). The present study showed that statins use might be significantly associated with lower overall mortality in CRC with a random effects model (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.86, I² = 61.9%, p value for Q test <0.001). In addition, statins use might be significantly associated with lower cancer-specific mortality in CRC with a random effects model (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.85, I² = 57.3%, p value for Q test = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the present study indicated that that statin use was a protective factor for CRC prognosis. However, the relationship between statins use and CRC prognosis requires repeated and large prospective studies to be verified.

Novel Combinatorial Approaches to Tackle the Immunosuppressive Microenvironment of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second-most common cancer in men worldwide and treatment options for patients with advanced or aggressive prostate cancer or recurrent disease continue to be of limited success and are rarely curative. Despite immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) efficacy in some melanoma, lung, kidney and breast cancers, immunotherapy efforts have been remarkably unsuccessful in PCa. One hypothesis behind this lack of efficacy is the generation of a distinctly immunosuppressive prostate tumor microenvironment (TME) by regulatory T cells, MDSCs, and type 2 macrophages which have been implicated in a variety of pathological conditions including solid cancers. In PCa, Tregs and MDSCs are attracted to TME by low-grade chronic inflammatory signals, while tissue-resident type 2 macrophages are induced by cytokines such as IL4, IL10, IL13, transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) or prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) produced by Th2 cells. These then drive tumor progression, therapy resistance and the generation of castration resistance, ultimately conferring a poor prognosis. The biology of MDSC and Treg is highly complex and the development, proliferation, maturation or function can each be pharmacologically mediated to counteract the immunosuppressive effects of these cells. Herein, we present a critical review of Treg, MDSC and M2 involvement in PCa progression but also investigate a newly recognized type of immune suppression induced by the chronic stimulation of the sympathetic adrenergic signaling pathway and propose targeted strategies to be used in a combinatorial modality with immunotherapy interventions such as ICB, Sipuleucel-T or antitumor vaccines for an enhanced anti-PCa tumor immune response. We conclude that a strategic sequence of therapeutic interventions in combination with additional holistic measures will be necessary to achieve maximum benefit for PCa patients.

The effect of statins on advanced prostate cancer patients with androgen deprivation therapy or abiraterone/enzalutamide: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of statin use on the treatment outcomes (i.e. overall survival and cancer-specific survival) among advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or abiraterone/enzalutamide.

METHODS

The original studies, examining the effects of statins on the outcomes (i.e. overall survival and cancer-specific survival) among PCa patients treated with ADT or abiraterone/enzalutamide, were identified through a systematic search by two independent reviewers in the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology databases. Databases were searched using keywords (abiraterone OR enzalutamide OR androgen deprivation therapy) AND statin. In total, nine eligible studies from 111 references were included for final analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Statin use significantly lowered the risk of all-cause mortality (100 709 patients, HR = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.64-0.83, P < .00001) and the risk of cancer-specific mortality (100 343 patients, HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.53-0.77, P < .00001) in advanced PCa patients treated with ADT. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were reliable. However, it could not generate reliable evidence in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide, as relevant studies were limited and had inconsistent results.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The review indicated that the use of statins in combination with ADT was associated with better all-cause survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with advanced PCa. Randomized controlled trials should be conducted to establish efficacy of statins among PCa patients.

The Hippo Pathway in Prostate Cancer

Despite recent efforts, prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most common cancers in men. Currently, there is no effective treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is, therefore, an urgent need to identify new therapeutic targets. The Hippo pathway and its downstream effectors—the transcriptional co-activators, Yes-associated protein (YAP) and its paralog, transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ)—are foremost regulators of stem cells and cancer biology. Defective Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ hyperactivation are common across various cancers. Here, we draw on insights learned from other types of cancers and review the latest advances linking the Hippo pathway and YAP/TAZ to PCa onset and progression. We examine the regulatory interaction between Hippo-YAP/TAZ and the androgen receptor (AR), as main regulators of PCa development, and how uncontrolled expression of YAP/TAZ drives castration resistance by inducing cellular stemness. Finally, we survey the potential therapeutic targeting of the Hippo pathway and YAP/TAZ to overcome PCa.