Lateralization in 11 C-Metomidate PET and outcome of adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism

Clinical significance of CYP11B2 immunostaining in unilateral primary aldosteronism

Objective

The associations between adrenal histopathology, lateralization studies, and surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism remain poorly characterized. We examined the value of immunohistochemical analysis of CYP11B2 for evaluation of adrenalectomy outcomes after anatomical versus functional subtyping.

Design

A retrospective multicenter study of 277 patients operated for primary aldosteronism who had an adrenalectomy sample available in the Finnish biobanks from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. Adrenal slides from biobanks were analyzed centrally after CYP11B2 and CYP11B1 staining. Clinical data were obtained from patient registries. Histopathological diagnosis and cure after surgery were assessed as outcome measures.

Results

Re-evaluation with CYP11B2 staining changed the histopathological diagnosis in 91 patients (33%). The presence of a CYP11B2-positive adenoma and the use of functional subtyping independently predicted clinical cure of primary aldosteronism. CYP11B2-positive <7 mm nodules were more frequent in patients without clinical cure, whereas CYP11B2-positive micronodules were common in all patients and had no impact on adrenalectomy outcomes. Small CYP11B2-positive nodules and micronodules were equally prevalent regardless of the subtyping method applied. Clinical cure rates were lower and CYP11B2-negative adenomas more common after adrenalectomy based on anatomical imaging than functional studies.

Conclusions

Incorporating CYP11B2 staining in histopathological diagnosis enhances the prediction of surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism. A finding of CYP11B2-positive adenoma is indicative of cure of primary aldosteronism, whereas smaller CYP11B2-positive nodules associate with poorer results at postoperative evaluation. Functional subtyping methods decrease the operations of CYP11B2-negative adenomas and are superior to anatomical imaging in identifying unilateral primary aldosteronism.

Treating Primary Aldosteronism-Induced Hypertension: Novel Approaches and Future Outlooks

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared with blood pressure-matched cases of primary hypertension. Current limitations in patient care stem from delayed recognition of the condition, limited access to key diagnostic procedures, and lack of a definitive therapy option for nonsurgical candidates. However, several recent advances have the potential to address these barriers to optimal care. From a diagnostic perspective, machine-learning algorithms have shown promise in the prediction of PA subtypes, while the development of noninvasive alternatives to adrenal vein sampling (including molecular positron emission tomography imaging) has made accurate localization of functioning adrenal nodules possible. In parallel, more selective approaches to targeting the causative aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma/nodule (APA/APN) have emerged with the advent of partial adrenalectomy or precision ablation. Additionally, the development of novel pharmacological agents may help to mitigate off-target effects of aldosterone and improve clinical efficacy and outcomes. Here, we consider how each of these innovations might change our approach to the patient with PA, to allow more tailored investigation and treatment plans, with corresponding improvement in clinical outcomes and resource utilization, for this highly prevalent disorder.

Primary Aldosteronism and Drug Resistant Hypertension: A "Chicken-Egg" Story

Drug-resistant arterial hypertension (RH) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, often due to overlooked underlying causes. Identification of such causes poses significant clinical challenges. In this setting, primary aldosteronism (PA) is a frequent cause of RH and its prevalence in RH patients is likely higher than 20%.The pathophysiological link between PA and the development and maintenance of RH involves target organ damage and the cellular and extracellular effects of aldosterone excess that promote pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic changes in the kidney and vasculature.The feasibility of adrenal vein sampling in PA patients with RH, and the clinical benefit achieved by adrenalectomy, further emphasize the need to implement systematic screening for this common form of secondary hypertension in the management of a high-risk population as RH patients.: We herein review the current knowledge of the factors that contribute to the RH phenotype with a focus on PA and discuss the issues regarding the screening for PA in this setting and the therapeutic approaches (surgical and medical) aimed at resolving RH caused by PA.

Lateralization in 11 C-Metomidate PET and outcome of adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism

INTRODUCTION

Subtype classification method is essential when considering adrenalectomy as a possible treatment for primary aldosteronism. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate surgical outcomes of primary aldosteronism in patients who had undergone ¹¹ C-metomidate positron emission tomography (¹¹ C-MTO-PET) for subtype classification.

METHODS

Postoperative clinical and biochemical cure and histopathological diagnosis from biobank samples were retrospectively evaluated in 44 patients who had all undergone preoperative ¹¹ C-MTO-PET with or without adrenal venous sampling (AVS). We compared those operated based on ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone and those with concordant or discordant lateralization in ¹¹ C-MTO-PET and AVS studies according to postoperative immunohistochemical findings and biochemical and clinical cure.

RESULTS

Adrenalectomy side was based on ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone in 14 cases and on AVS in 30 cases of whom 42 achieved complete and two partial biochemical cures. Among those who underwent AVS and were operated according to it, the two lateralization methods were concordant in 22 cases and discordant in 8 cases. Similar immunohistochemical profiles and cure rates were seen after ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone or AVS-based operations. Respectively, those with concordant or discordant ¹¹ C-MTO-PET and AVS lateralization did not differ in surgical outcome. Together, we found errors of lateralization diagnostics with ¹¹ C-MTO-PET in 18% and with AVS in 3% among those eligible for adrenal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of adrenalectomy based on clinically significant lateralization in ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone correspond to those based on ¹¹ C-MTO-PET with concordant AVS lateralization. However, our results suggest that diagnosis of unilateral PA should be performed with caution with ¹¹ C-MTO-PET in case of discordant lateralization studies.