Clinical significance of CYP11B2 immunostaining in unilateral primary aldosteronism

Objective

The associations between adrenal histopathology, lateralization studies, and surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism remain poorly characterized. We examined the value of immunohistochemical analysis of CYP11B2 for evaluation of adrenalectomy outcomes after anatomical versus functional subtyping.

Design

A retrospective multicenter study of 277 patients operated for primary aldosteronism who had an adrenalectomy sample available in the Finnish biobanks from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. Adrenal slides from biobanks were analyzed centrally after CYP11B2 and CYP11B1 staining. Clinical data were obtained from patient registries. Histopathological diagnosis and cure after surgery were assessed as outcome measures.

Results

Re-evaluation with CYP11B2 staining changed the histopathological diagnosis in 91 patients (33%). The presence of a CYP11B2-positive adenoma and the use of functional subtyping independently predicted clinical cure of primary aldosteronism. CYP11B2-positive <7 mm nodules were more frequent in patients without clinical cure, whereas CYP11B2-positive micronodules were common in all patients and had no impact on adrenalectomy outcomes. Small CYP11B2-positive nodules and micronodules were equally prevalent regardless of the subtyping method applied. Clinical cure rates were lower and CYP11B2-negative adenomas more common after adrenalectomy based on anatomical imaging than functional studies.

Conclusions

Incorporating CYP11B2 staining in histopathological diagnosis enhances the prediction of surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism. A finding of CYP11B2-positive adenoma is indicative of cure of primary aldosteronism, whereas smaller CYP11B2-positive nodules associate with poorer results at postoperative evaluation. Functional subtyping methods decrease the operations of CYP11B2-negative adenomas and are superior to anatomical imaging in identifying unilateral primary aldosteronism.

Lateralization in 11 C-Metomidate PET and outcome of adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism

INTRODUCTION

Subtype classification method is essential when considering adrenalectomy as a possible treatment for primary aldosteronism. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate surgical outcomes of primary aldosteronism in patients who had undergone ¹¹ C-metomidate positron emission tomography (¹¹ C-MTO-PET) for subtype classification.

METHODS

Postoperative clinical and biochemical cure and histopathological diagnosis from biobank samples were retrospectively evaluated in 44 patients who had all undergone preoperative ¹¹ C-MTO-PET with or without adrenal venous sampling (AVS). We compared those operated based on ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone and those with concordant or discordant lateralization in ¹¹ C-MTO-PET and AVS studies according to postoperative immunohistochemical findings and biochemical and clinical cure.

RESULTS

Adrenalectomy side was based on ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone in 14 cases and on AVS in 30 cases of whom 42 achieved complete and two partial biochemical cures. Among those who underwent AVS and were operated according to it, the two lateralization methods were concordant in 22 cases and discordant in 8 cases. Similar immunohistochemical profiles and cure rates were seen after ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone or AVS-based operations. Respectively, those with concordant or discordant ¹¹ C-MTO-PET and AVS lateralization did not differ in surgical outcome. Together, we found errors of lateralization diagnostics with ¹¹ C-MTO-PET in 18% and with AVS in 3% among those eligible for adrenal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of adrenalectomy based on clinically significant lateralization in ¹¹ C-MTO-PET alone correspond to those based on ¹¹ C-MTO-PET with concordant AVS lateralization. However, our results suggest that diagnosis of unilateral PA should be performed with caution with ¹¹ C-MTO-PET in case of discordant lateralization studies.