Outcome and prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in mildly dilated cardiomyopathy vs. dilated cardiomyopathy

C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians

The current literature provides a body of evidence on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and its potential role in inflammation. However, most pieces of evidence are sparse and controversial. This critical state-of-the-art monography provides all the crucial data on the potential biochemical properties of the protein, along with further evidence on its potential pathobiology, both for its pentameric and monomeric forms, including information for its ligands as well as the possible function of autoantibodies against the protein. Furthermore, the current evidence on its potential utility as a biomarker of various diseases is presented, of all cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, renal, gynecological, andrological, dental, oral, otorhinolaryngological, ophthalmological, dermatological, musculoskeletal, neurological, mental, splenic, thyroid conditions, as well as infections, autoimmune-supposed conditions and neoplasms, including other possible factors that have been linked with elevated concentrations of that protein. Moreover, data on molecular diagnostics on CRP are discussed, and possible etiologies of false test results are highlighted. Additionally, this review evaluates all current pieces of evidence on CRP and systemic inflammation, and highlights future goals. Finally, a novel diagnostic algorithm to carefully assess the CRP level for a precise diagnosis of a medical condition is illustrated.

Comparison of Clinical Course and Outcomes between Dilated and Hypokinetic Non-Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

By definition, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by enlargement of the left ventricular (LV) cavity, and systolic dysfunction. However, in 2016 ESC introduced a new clinical entity - hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy (HNDC). HNDC is defined as LV systolic dysfunction without LV dilatation. However, the diagnosis of HNDC has so far rarely been made by a cardiologist, and it is unknown whether "classic" DCM differs from HNDC in terms of clinical course and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

Comparison of heart failure profiles and outcomes between patients with "classic" dilated (DCM) and HNDCs.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed 785 DCM patients, defined as impaired left ventricle (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction [LVEF] <45%) in the absence of coronary artery disease, valve disease, congenital heart disease, and severe arterial hypertension. "Classic" DCM was diagnosed when LV dilatation was present (LV end-diastolic diameter >52 mm/58 mm in women/men); otherwise, HNDC was diagnosed. After 47 ± 31 months, the all-cause mortality and composite endpoint (all-cause mortality, heart transplant - HTX, left ventricle assist device implantation - LVAD) were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 617 (79%) patients with LV dilatation. Patients with "classic" DCM differed from HNDC in terms of clinically relevant parameters [hypertension (47% vs. 64%, p = 0.008), ventricular tachyarrhythmias (29% vs. 15%, p = 0.007), NYHA class (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 2.2 ± 0.8, p = 0.003)], had lower cholesterol (LDL: 2.9 ± 1.0 vs. 3.2 ± 1.1 mmol/L, p = 0.049), and higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (3,351 ± 5,415 vs. 2,563 ± 8584 pg/mL, p = 0.0001) and required higher diuretics dosages (57.8 ± 89.5 vs. 33.7 ± 48.7 mg/day, p ≤ 0.0001). All of their chambers were larger (LVEDd: 68.3 ± 4.5 vs. 52.7 ± 3.5 mm, p < 0.0001) and they had lower LVEF (25.2 ± 9.4 vs. 36.6 ± 11.7%, p < 0.0001). During the follow-up, there were 145 (18%) composite endpoints ("classic" DCM vs. HNDC: 122 [20%] vs. 26 [18%], p = 0.22): deaths (97 [16%] vs. 24 [14%], p = 0.67), HTX (17 [4%] vs. 4 [4%], p = 0.97) and LVAD (19 [5%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.03). Both groups did not differ in terms of all-cause mortality (p = 0.70), cardiovascular (CV) mortality (p = 0.37) and composite endpoint (p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

LV dilatation was absent in more than one-fifth of DCM patients. HNDC patients had less severe heart failure symptoms, less advanced cardiac remodelling, and required lower diuretics dosages. On the other hand, "classic" DCM and HNDC patients did not differ in terms of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and composite endpoint.

Predictive value of remnant cholesterol level for all-cause mortality in heart failure patients

Background

Lower cholesterol levels are associated with increased mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. Remnant cholesterol corresponds to all cholesterol not found in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The prognostic role of remnant cholesterol in HF remains unknown.

Objective

To reveal the relationship between the baseline remnant cholesterol level and all-cause mortality in HF patients.

Methods

This study enrolled 2,823 patients hospitalized for HF. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, C-statistic, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the prognostic value of remnant cholesterol for all-cause mortality in HF.

Results

The mortality rate was lowest in the fourth quartile of remnant cholesterol, which had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.56 [HR: 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.68, p < 0.001] relative to the first quartile. After adjustment, a one-unit increase in the level of remnant cholesterol was associated with a 41% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73, p < 0.001). A refinement in risk prediction was observed after adding remnant cholesterol quartile to the original model (ΔC-statistic = 0.010, 95% CI: 0.003-0.017; NRI = 0.036, 95% CI: 0.003-0.070; IDI = 0.025, 95% CI: 0.018-0.033; all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Low remnant cholesterol levels are associated with increased all-cause mortality in HF patients. The addition of the remnant cholesterol quartile improved the predictive value over traditional risk factors.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, Unique Identifier: NCT02664818.

Analysis of C-reactive protein from finger stick dried blood spot to predict high risk of cardiovascular disease

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein involved in inflammation. Furthermore, CRP is an important biomarker used in diagnostics to predict risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in addition to monitoring bacterial and viral infections. To measure plasma CRP, venipuncture is still necessitated and has to be performed by trained phlebotomists. As a solution, dried blood spots (DBS) are used for minimally invasive at-home sampling of blood and can be send to diagnostic laboratories by regular mail. In this study, we included 53 patients that presented to the outpatient clinic of the University Medical Center Utrecht. Capillary finger stick was used to spot blood on a filter paper card and allowed to dry. After extraction of DBS, CRP was analyzed on an automated high-throughput chemistry analyzer. Additional validation steps regarding stability, effect of hematocrit, precision, and limits of blank and quantitation were conducted according to corresponding Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards. An excellent regression analysis of R2 (95% confidence interval) = 0.986 (0.982-0.989) was found. This enabled correct classification for high CVD risk of all 25 cases with sensitivity (95% CI) of 1.00 (1.00-1.00) and specificity (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.89-1.03) and correct diagnosis of inflammation of 12/13 cases with sensitivity (95% CI) of 0.92 (0.77-1.07) and specificity (95% CI) of 1.00 (1.00-1.00). Furthermore, CRP was found to be stable for 31 days and observed hematocrit variation amongst patients was clinically acceptable. CRP from DBS can be accurately measured on an automated high-throughput chemistry analyzer and used to diagnose inflammation and classify high CVD risk. This method enables individuals to engage in at-home sampling of blood on DBS for (tele)diagnostics, screening programs, patient follow-up, and medication management.

Prognostic potential of liver injury in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a retrospective study

Background

Liver injury (LI) has been frequently observed in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), whereas its prognostic value remains blurry. We attempted to appraise the prognostic effect of LI in patients with DCM.

Methods

This retrospective study included 523 patients with DCM. LI was defined as a threefold increase in aspartate transaminase (≥ 135 U/L) or alanine transaminase (≥ 180 U/L) or a twofold increase in total bilirubin (≥ 41 umol/L) during hospitalization. The population was segmented into non-liver injury (NLI) group and LI group based on liver function test data. To balance differences in covariates at baseline, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.

Results

Patients with LI had lower survival rate, compared with those with NLI (44.6% vs. 73.8%, P < 0.001). Similar results were also found in age (age > 50, 39.6% vs. 70.9%, P < 0.001; age ≤ 50, 51.3% vs. 79.5%, P < 0.001) and gender stratified analysis (male, 46.2% vs. 74.4%, P < 0.001; female 35.7% vs. 72.0%, P = 0.001). After PSM, the survival rate of patients with LI remained lower than those with NLI (44.6% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.019). Multivariable Cox regression analysis manifested that LI (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.692, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.194–2.398, P = 0.003; HR: 1.675, 95% CI 1.078–2.604, P = 0.022, respectively) showed potent predictive effect on all-cause mortality in patients with DCM, both before and after PSM.

Conclusions

The occurrence of LI herald adverse outcomes in patients with DCM and attention to LI may be conducive to risk stratification and management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00876-9.

Role of biomarkers in the heart failure clinic

Heart failure (HF) is a common cardiovascular disease that has a complex pathophysiology. Because it is the final stage of many cardiovascular diseases, proper diagnosis and treatment are crucial for prolonging patients’ survival and improving their well-being. Several biomarkers have been identified in HF, and their roles in diagnosis and prognostication have been widely investigated. Among them, natriuretic peptides are key for diagnosing HF, predicting its prognosis, and monitoring the effectiveness of HF treatment. Moreover, natriuretic peptides can also be used to treat HF. In addition to natriuretic peptides, several other biomarkers were included in the most recent HF management guidelines. Thus, we reviewed the role of the biomarkers included in these guidelines and discussed future perspectives.