Change in cognitive functioning in depressed older adults following treatment with sertraline or nortriptyline

Cognitive Outcomes After Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy for Late-Life Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The authors evaluated whether treatment of late-life depression (LLD) with antidepressants leads to changes in cognitive function.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for adults age 50 or older (or mean age of 65 or older) with LLD was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycInfo were searched through December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was a change on cognitive test scores from baseline to after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the effects of specific medications and the associations between changes in depressive symptoms and cognitive test scores. Participants with bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, dementia, or neurological disease were excluded. Findings from all eligible studies were synthesized at a descriptive level, and a random-effects model was used to pool the results for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included. Thirteen of 19 studies showed an improvement on at least one cognitive test after antidepressant pharmacotherapy, with the most robust evidence for the memory and learning (nine of 16 studies) and processing speed (seven of 10 studies) domains and for sertraline (all five studies). Improvements in depressive symptoms were associated with improvement in cognitive test scores in six of seven relevant studies. The meta-analysis (eight studies; N=493) revealed a statistically significant overall improvement in memory and learning (five studies: effect size=0.254, 95% CI=0.103-0.404, SE=0.077); no statistically significant changes were seen in other cognitive domains. The evaluated risk of publication bias was low.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant pharmacotherapy of LLD appears to improve certain domains of cognitive function, particularly memory and learning. This effect may be mediated by an improvement in depressive symptoms. Studies comparing individuals receiving pharmacotherapy with untreated control participants are needed.

Sertraline modulates hippocampal plasticity and learning via sigma 1 receptors, cellular stress and neurosteroids

In addition to modulating serotonin transport, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have multiple other effects that may contribute to clinical effects, and some of these latter actions prompt repurposing of SSRIs for non-psychiatric indications. We recently observed that the SSRIs fluvoxamine and fluoxetine prevent the acute adverse effects of pro-inflammatory stimulation on long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 hippocampal region. Sertraline showed markedly different effects, acutely inhibiting LTP at a low micromolar concentration through inverse agonism of sigma 1 receptors (S1Rs). In the present studies, we pursued mechanisms contributing to sertraline modulation of LTP in rat hippocampal slices. We found that sertraline partially inhibits synaptic responses mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) via effects on NMDARs that express GluN2B subunits. A selective S1R antagonist (NE-100), but not an S1R agonist (PRE-084) blocked effects on NMDARs, despite the fact that both S1R ligands were previously shown to prevent LTP inhibition. Both NE-100 and PRE-084, however, prevented adverse effects of sertraline on one-trial learning. Because of the important role that S1Rs play in modulating endoplasmic reticulum stress, we examined whether inhibitors of cellular stress alter effects of sertraline. We found that two stress inhibitors, ISRIB and quercetin, prevented LTP inhibition, as did inhibitors of the synthesis of endogenous neurosteroids, which are homeostatic regulators of cellular stress. These studies highlight complex effects of sertraline, S1Rs and neurosteroids on hippocampal function and have relevance for understanding therapeutic and adverse drug actions.

The effect of second-generation antidepressant treatment on the attention and mental processing speed of patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis study with structural equation models

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been linked to attention and mental processing speed deficits that can be improved after pharmacological treatment. However, it is unclear whether a class of antidepressants is more effective than others to ameliorate these deficits in MDD. Additionally, the possible effects of clinical and demographic variables on improving MDD attention and processing speed deficits after antidepressant treatment are unknown. We aimed to study the possible neuropsychological effects of second-generation antidepressant classes on the attention and processing speed of MDD patients and the potential influences of clinical and demographic variables as moderators of these effects using a meta-analytic approach. Twenty-five papers were included in our study. A structural equation model meta-analysis was performed. The improvement of attention and processing speed after pharmacological treatment is clinically relevant but incomplete. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and dual inhibitors are the drugs causing the greatest improvement in the processing speed of MDD patients. Antidepressant class is an important variable linked to processing speed improvement after MDD treatment. However, the degree of improvement in both cognitive functions is strongly influenced by some clinical and demographic variables of depressed patients, such are age and education of the MDD patients, the duration of the antidepressant treatment, and the depression status of the patients.

THE EFFECT OF SECOND-GENERATION ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT ON THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS OF PATIENTS WITH MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER: A META-ANALYSIS STUDY WITH STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been linked to executive functions (EF) deficits that can be improved after pharmacological treatment, but it is unclear whether there is a class of antidepressants that is more effective than others to ameliorate these deficits in MDD. Additionally, the possible effects of clinical and demographic variables on the improvement of MDD EF deficits after pharmacological treatment are currently unknown. Our aim was to study the possible neuropsychological effects of second-generation antidepressant classes on the EF of MDD patients and the potential influence of clinical and demographic variables as moderators of these effects through a meta-analytic approach. Twenty-one papers were included in our study. A structural equation model meta-analysis was performed. The improvement of EF after pharmacological treatment is clinically relevant, but it is incomplete. This effect is influenced by age and years of education of the patients. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and dual inhibitors are the drugs causing the greatest improvement in EF of MDD patients. Antidepressant class is an important variable linked to EF improvement after MDD treatment, but the degree of improvement in these cognitive functions is strongly influenced by some clinical and demographic variables of patients with depression.

Neurocognitive performance predicts treatment outcome with cognitive behavioral therapy for major depressive disorder

The current study examined the contribution of baseline neuropsychological functioning to the prediction of antidepressant outcome with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). We hypothesized that depressed participants who were more neurocognitively intact and had less rigid, negative thinking would respond better to CBT. Thirty-one MDD patients completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery before initiation of CBT. A subgroup also completed a probabilistic reversal learning task. Depression severity was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); rigid, negative thinking was assessed with the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS) and the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) throughout treatment. Remitters were compared to non-remitters. Paradoxically, eventual remitters performed generally worse across the neuropsychological battery considered as a whole. Univariate testing showed a significant difference on only a single measure, the Continuous Performance Test d', when corrected for multiple comparisons. Baseline rigid, negative thinking did not predict treatment outcome. Results suggest that the structure of CBT may particularly benefit individuals with mild depression-related neurocognitive difficulties during a depressive episode. Further research is needed to examine these patient characteristics and their potential contribution to the mechanisms of CBT efficacy.

Assessment and Management of Cognitive and Psychosocial Dysfunctions in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Clinical Review

Background: Full functional recovery is defined as a state in which patients are again able to enjoy their usual activities, return to work, and take care of themselves, and it should represent the end goal of treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with MDD report many unmet needs, including residual cognitive symptoms, lack of improvement in psychosocial functioning and life satisfaction, even during mood symptom remission. In this paper, we aim to: (a) identify the available assessment tools for evaluating cognitive and psychosocial functioning in patients with MDD; (b) provide an overview of therapeutic options that can improve full functional recovery in MDD also by improving cognitive symptoms. Methods: The relevant databases MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge - Web of Science Index, Cochrane Reviews Library and PsychoINFO were searched for identifying papers on validated tools for the assessment of cognitive and personal functioning in patients with MDD. Results: New assessment tools (such as the THINC-it TOOL, the COBRA, the SCIP-D, and the UPSA-D) have been developed for evaluating the cognitive dysfunction in MDD patients. Adopting these tools in the clinical routine practice is useful to evaluate the improvement in cognitive functioning and, therefore, the achievement of full functioning recovery. The optimal management of patients with MDD include the combination of pharmacological compounds and psychosocial interventions for achieving full functional recovery in patients with MDD. Conclusions: Full functional recovery must be the target of any treatment programme for patients with MDD. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to develop personalized treatment and integrate psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions.

Improvement in neurocognitive functions and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in patients with depression treated with antidepressants and yoga

CONTEXT AND AIMS

Impairment in cognition is well-known in patients with major depressive disorder. This study examined the effect of yoga therapy with or without antidepressants and antidepressants alone on certain neuropsychological functions in patients with depression. Correlation between changes in neuropsychological test performance and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels was also explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antidepressant-naïve/antidepressant-free outpatients with depression received antidepressant medication alone (n = 23) or yoga therapy with (n = 26) or without (n = 16) antidepressants. Depression was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Neuropsychological tests included digit-span forward and backward, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and Trail Making Tests (TMT-A and B). These tests were administered before and 3 months after the treatment in patients, and once in healthy comparison subjects (n = 19).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Baseline differences were analyzed using independent sample t-test, Chi-square, and one-way ANOVA. Paired t-test was used to analyze the change from baseline to follow-up. Pearson's correlation was used to explore the association of change between 2 variables.

RESULTS

Patients had impaired performance on most neuropsychological tests. After 3 months, there was significant improvement - patients' performance was comparable to that of healthy controls on majority of the tests. Significant inverse correlation was observed between increase in BDNF levels and improvement in TMT "A" duration in Yoga-alone group (r = -0.647; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude that, Yoga therapy, alone or in combination with medications, is associated with improved neuropsychological functions and neuroplastic effects in patients with depression.

Treatment of neurocognitive symptoms in unipolar depression: A systematic review and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Cognitive symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are persistent and commonly entail neurocognitive impairment and a decline in quality of life. This systematic review gathers the current scientific evidence on therapeutic strategies for neuropsychological impairment in MDD.

METHOD

A systematic search on PubMed, PsycINFO and Clinicaltrials.gov was carried out on December 2016 according to PRISMA using Boolean terms to identify interventions for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in MDD. Only English-written articles providing original data and focusing in adults with MDD were included with no time restrictions.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies reporting data on 40 pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions were included. Interventions were grouped into the following categories: 1) Pharmacological Therapies (antidepressants, stimulants, compounds acting on NMDA receptors, compounds acting on the cholinergic system, compounds showing anti-inflammatory or antioxidant properties, other mechanisms of action), 2) Physical Therapies and 3) Psychological Therapies, 4) Exercise. There are some promising compounds showing a positive impact on cognitive symptoms including vortioxetine, lisdexamfetamine or erythropoietin.

LIMITATIONS

The studies included showed significant methodological differences in heterogeneous samples. The lack of a standardized neuropsychological battery makes comparisons between studies difficult.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence is not sufficient to widely recommend the use of procognitive treatments in MDD although promising results are coming to light.

Physical exercise for late life depression: effects on cognition and disability

BACKGROUND

Late-life depression is often associated with cognitive impairments and disability, which may persist even after adequate antidepressant drug treatment. Physical exercise is increasingly recognized as an effective antidepressant agent, and may exert positive effects on these features too. However, few studies examined this issue, especially by comparing different types of exercises.

METHODS

We performed secondary analyses on data from the Safety and Efficacy of Exercise for Depression in Seniors study, a trial comparing the antidepressant effectiveness of sertraline (S), sertraline plus thrice-weekly non-progressive exercise (S+NPE), and sertraline plus thrice-weekly progressive aerobic exercise (S+PAE). Exercise was conducted in small groups and monitored by heart rate meters. Patients with late-life depression without severe cognitive impairment were recruited from primary care and assessed at baseline and 24 weeks, using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA, total and subdomain scores) and Brief Disability Questionnaire. Analyses were based on Generalized Linear Models.

RESULTS

In total, 121 patients (mean age 75, 71% females) were randomized to the study interventions. Compared with the S group, patients in the S+PAE group displayed greater improvements of MOCA total scores (p=0.006, effect size=0.37), visuospatial/executive functions (p=0.001, effect size=0.13), and disability (p=0.02, effect size=-0.31). Participants in the S+NPE group did not display significant differences with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding aerobic, progressive exercise to antidepressant drug treatment may offer significant advantages over standard treatment for cognitive abilities and disability. These findings suggest that even among older patients exercise may constitute a valid therapeutic measure to improve patients' outcomes.

Effects of sertraline, duloxetine, vortioxetine, and idazoxan in the rat affective bias test

RATIONALE

Affective biases seemingly play a crucial role for the onset and development of depression. Acute treatment with monoamine-based antidepressants positively influences emotional processing, and an early correction of biases likely results in repeated positive experiences that ultimately lead to improved mood.

OBJECTIVES

Using two conventional antidepressants, sertraline and duloxetine, we aimed to forward the characterization of a newly developed affective bias test (ABT) for rats. Further, we examined the effect of vortioxetine, a recently approved antidepressant, and the α₂ adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan on affective biases.

METHODS

Sprague Dawley rats were tested in an affective bias test using a fully balanced within-subject study design. Rats learned to associate two different digging substrates with a reward during six reward-pairing days. The absolute value of the rewards was identical, but the affective state at the time of learning induces a positive or negative bias towards the treatment-paired digging substrate at recall. The choice bias between the two digging substrates at recall represents the affective bias. Sertraline (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg), duloxetine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg), vortioxetine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) and idazoxan (3 and 10 mg/kg) were tested in the ABT.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

All four drugs, regardless of their mechanism of action, induced a positive affective bias in the ABT, although the overall effect of treatment was not statistically significant for sertraline and duloxetine. The largest effects were induced by vortioxetine and idazoxan, both of which caused significant positive biases at all tested doses.

The impact of cognitive challenges in major depression: the role of the primary care physician

Nearly 1 in 5 Americans will struggle with major depression in their lives; some will have recurring bouts. Recent psychiatric research has given new attention to the prevalence of cognitive deficits in major depression and the impact such deficits have on remission and overall life functioning. When depression is partially treated i.e., leaving residual symptoms, patients have higher rates of relapse and lower functional outcomes. Impaired cognitive functioning is a frequent residual symptom, persisting in about 45% of patients even when emotional symptoms have improved, and results in a disproportionate share of the functional impairment, particularly in the workplace. Patients with depression have disrupted circuitry in brain regions responsible for cognition and it is therefore important to screen depressed patients for cognitive as well as emotional symptoms. Cognitive dysfunction should be evaluated in every mood disordered patient with validated self-report scales such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or the Beck Depression Inventory and objective measures of cognitive function are also very very useful. Two easily administered tests are the Trails B Test and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Each take less than two minutes and measure working memory, executive function, and processing speed and can track cognitive improvement in depressed patients. Treatment of cognitive dysfunction in major depression is complicated by the 'serotonin conundrum': SSRI's frequently do not treat to full remission, and can cause cognitive blunting-actually adding to cognitive problems. Based on recent data including results from a recently completed meta-analysis by McIntyre and colleagues, an evidence-based algorithm for treating cognitive symptoms in depression is presented. A hierarchy of antidepressants and augmentation strategies based on the best available evidence is discussed. In conclusion, cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder have been recognized as a target of therapeutic improvement by the FDA and have become a focus of clinical importance.

Cognitive Function before and during Treatment with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Patients with Depression or Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Objectives. Identification of adverse effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is of great importance due to their extensive use in medicine. Some studies have reported the effects of SSRIs on cognitive functions, but the results are conflicting. This study was designed to assess the effect of these drugs on cognition of patients with depression or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods. Patients with depression or OCD, naïve to therapy, and candidates of receiving one drug from SSRI class, voluntarily, entered this study. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test was the tool to assess their cognitive functions. MMSE scores of each patient were recorded prior to taking SSRIs and at weeks 3, 5, and 8 of drug therapy. Results. 50 patients met our inclusion criteria, with a baseline mean MMSE score of 23.94. At 3, 5, and 8 weeks of treatment, the mean scores were 22.1, 21.4, and 20.66, respectively. With a p value of <0.0001, the gradual decline was statistically significant. Conclusion. The MMSE scores of our patients showed a gradual decline over the consecutive weeks after taking SSRI drugs. It seems that the use of SSRIs in patients with depression or OCD, can cause cognitive dysfunction in the acute phase of treatment.

O Procedimento Selective Reminding na Avaliação da Memória e Aprendizagem: Um Levantamento de Estudos Brasileiros

RESUMO Os pesquisadores têm à sua disposição uma variedade de métodos que auxiliam a compreensão dos processos de memória e aprendizagem. O presente artigo tem como objetivo revisitar o procedimento de recordação seletiva, apresentando suas características e variações, e realizar um levantamento de estudos brasileiros que fizeram uso do mesmo. São apresentadas as diferenças entre a recordação seletiva e o procedimento padrão em tarefas de aprendizagem por recordação livre. Constatou-se que, no Brasil, além de diferentes tarefas, são utilizadas formas de aplicações distintas do procedimento. A utilização da recordação seletiva apresenta relevância no estudo da memória e da aprendizagem, em especial na busca pela diferenciação entre as dificuldades normais de memórias e os déficits patológicos dessa função cognitiva.

The Cognitive Effects of Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Cognitive dysfunction is often present in major depressive disorder (MDD). Several clinical trials have noted a pro-cognitive effect of antidepressants in MDD. The objective of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the pooled efficacy of antidepressants on various domains of cognition in MDD.

METHODS

Trials published prior to April 15, 2015, were identified through searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and relevant review articles. Data from randomized clinical trials assessing the cognitive effects of antidepressants were pooled to determine standard mean differences (SMD) using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Nine placebo-controlled randomized trials (2 550 participants) evaluating the cognitive effects of vortioxetine (n = 728), duloxetine (n = 714), paroxetine (n = 23), citalopram (n = 84), phenelzine (n = 28), nortryptiline (n = 32), and sertraline (n = 49) were identified. Antidepressants had a positive effect on psychomotor speed (SMD 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.27; I(2) = 46%) and delayed recall (SMD 0.24; 95% CI 0.15-0.34; I(2) = 0%). The effect on cognitive control and executive function did not reach statistical significance. Of note, after removal of vortioxetine from the analysis, statistical significance was lost for psychomotor speed. Eight head-to-head randomized trials comparing the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; n = 371), selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; n = 25), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; n = 138), and norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRIs; n = 46) were identified. No statistically significant difference in cognitive effects was found when pooling results from head-to-head trials of SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs, and NDRIs. Significant limitations were the heterogeneity of results, limited number of studies, and small sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that antidepressants have a significant positive effect on psychomotor speed and delayed recall.

Diversity of approaches in assessment of executive functions in stroke: limited evidence?

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Cognitive functions and, in particular, executive function, are commonly affected after stroke, leading to impairments in performance of daily activities, decrease in social participation and in quality of life. Appropriate assessment and understanding of executive dysfunction are important, firstly to develop better rehabilitation strategies for executive functions per se and secondly to consider executive function abilities on rehabilitation strategies in general. The purpose of this review was to identify the most widely used assessment tools of executive dysfunction for patients with stroke, and their psychometric properties.

We systematically reviewed manuscripts published in English in databases from 1999 to 2015. We identified 35 publications. The most frequently used instruments were the Stroop, Digit Span and Trail making tests. Psychometric properties were described for the Executive Function Performance Test, Executive Clock Drawing Task, Chinese Frontal Assessment Battery and Virtual Action Planning — Supermarket, and two subtests of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination — Revised.

There is a paucity of tools to reliably measure executive dysfunction after stroke, despite the fact that executive dysfunction is frequent. Identification of the best tools for executive dysfunction assessment is necessary to address important gaps in research and in clinical practice.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognitive dysfunction and functional ability in clinical depression--a systematic review

Cognitive dysfunction is of clinical significance and exerts longstanding implication on patients׳ function. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of cognitive dysfunction are emerging. This review evaluates pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of cognitive impairment primarily in the domains of memory, attention, processing speed and executive function in clinical depression. A total of 35 studies were retrieved from Pubmed, PsycInfo and Scopus after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results show that various classes of antidepressants exert improving effects on cognitive function across several cognitive domains. Specifically, studies suggest that SSRIs, the SSRE tianeptine, the SNRI duloxetine, vortioxetine and other antidepressants such as bupropion and moclobemide may exert certain improving effects on cognitive function in depression, such as in learning and memory and executive function. Class-specific cognitive domains or specific dose-response relationships were not identified yet. The few non-pharmacological studies conducted employing cognitive orientated treatments and cognitive remediation therapy show promising results for the improvement of cognitive impairment in depression. However, several methodological constraints of studies limit generalizability of the results and caution the interpretation. Future direction should consider the development of a neuropsychological consensus cognitive battery to support the discovery, clinical assessment, comparison of studies and registration of new agents in clinical depression.

Prescribing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older age

Apart from commercial reasons, two motivations have led to the introduction of SSRIs to replace the first and second generation antidepressants already available. One was the search for a more rational treatment, based on specific mechanisms, the other the development of effective treatments with fewer side effects, particularly for older patients, who have a greater sensitivity to cardio-vascular and central nervous system effects. The first has been frustrated up to a point, in that SSRIs and other single mechanism drugs do not appear to be more effective than the earliest relatively non-specific antidepressants. The second has been fulfilled, in that SSRIs generally are better tolerated in older patients and in overdose. However, there is a spectrum of other side effects that are particularly relevant in older age and that need attention when treating depression in this particular patient group.