Reliability of extracellular contrast versus gadoxetic acid in assessing small liver lesions using liver imaging reporting and data system v.2018 and European association for the study of the liver criteria

From evidence to clinical practice: Bridging the gap of new liver cancer therapies in Latin America

The most common primary liver tumors are hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. They constitute the sixth most common neoplasia and the third cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although both tumors may share etiologic factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, and treatments, they differ substantially in determining distinctive clinical management. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of these neoplasms, particularly in advanced stages. In this review, we focus on the most relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment aspects of both, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, underlying their applicability in Latin America.

ESR Essentials: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma-practice recommendations by ESGAR

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy and a leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Current guidelines for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC are provided by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) which endorsed the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) algorithm, the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC), and the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). These allow the diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients in the presence of typical imaging features on contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Size, non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, enhancing capsule, and growth are major imaging features and they should be combined for the diagnosis of HCC. This article provides concise and relevant practice recommendations aimed at general radiologist audience, summarizing the best practice and informing on the essential imaging criteria for the diagnosis of HCC, while also discussing the high-risk population criteria, imaging modalities, and imaging features according to the current guidelines. KEY POINTS: • Noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be provided only in patients at high risk. • Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI are the first-line imaging exams for the diagnosis of HCC. • Major imaging features should be combined to provide the diagnosis of definitive HCC.

Correction of Arterial-Phase Motion Artifacts in Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI Using an Innovative Unsupervised Network

This study aims to propose and evaluate DR-CycleGAN, a disentangled unsupervised network by introducing a novel content-consistency loss, for removing arterial-phase motion artifacts in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI examinations. From June 2020 to July 2021, gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI data were retrospectively collected in this center to establish training and testing datasets. Motion artifacts were semi-quantitatively assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = no artifact, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, and 5 = non-diagnostic) and quantitatively evaluated using the structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). The datasets comprised a training dataset (308 examinations, including 58 examinations with artifact grade = 1 and 250 examinations with artifact grade ≥ 2), a paired test dataset (320 examinations, including 160 examinations with artifact grade = 1 and paired 160 examinations with simulated motion artifacts of grade ≥ 2), and an unpaired test dataset (474 examinations with artifact grade ranging from 1 to 5). The performance of DR-CycleGAN was evaluated and compared with a state-of-the-art network, Cycle-MedGAN V2.0. As a result, in the paired test dataset, DR-CycleGAN demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and PSNR values and lower motion artifact grades compared to Cycle-MedGAN V2.0 (0.89 ± 0.07 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09, 32.88 ± 2.11 vs. 30.81 ± 2.64, and 2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.0 ± 0.9, respectively; p < 0.001 each). In the unpaired test dataset, DR-CycleGAN also exhibited a superior motion artifact correction performance, resulting in a significant decrease in motion artifact grades from 2.9 ± 1.3 to 2.0 ± 0.6 compared to Cycle-MedGAN V2.0 (to 2.4 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). In conclusion, DR-CycleGAN effectively reduces motion artifacts in the arterial phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI examinations, offering the potential to enhance image quality.

Evaluation of washout using subtraction MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with spontaneously T1-hyperintense nodules

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of subtraction imaging on post-arterial phase images (i.e., portal venous, delayed/transitional and hepatobiliary phases) for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in spontaneously hyperintense nodules on T1-weighted imaging in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with a total 55 hepatic nodules that were spontaneously hyperintense on T1-weighted images were initially retrieved. All patients underwent MRI examination of the liver using extracellular agent. Each nodule was assessed for sensitivity and specificity using LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) during two reading sessions performed first without then with subtraction images on post-arterial phase images. The final standard of reference was defined by a step-by-step algorithm previously published combining histology, typical imaging, alfa fetoprotein and follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-six nodules (26 HCC) in 39 patients with cirrhosis were analyzed. Using LI-RADS, the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of HCC were 64% (95% CI: 41-83) and 67% (95% CI: 41-87) without subtraction; and 73% (95% CI: 50-89) (P > 0.999) and 33% (95% CI: 13-59) (P = 0.553) on subtraction imaging using extracellular contrast agent. Fifty-five percent (22/40) of nodules displayed a washout without subtraction and 70% (28/40) did so on subtraction imaging obtained with extracellular contrast agent. Twenty nodules out of 40 (50%) were classified LI-RADS 5 without subtraction, and 28 out of 40 nodules (70%) with subtraction.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the use of subtraction imaging on post-arterial phase images (i.e., PVP, DP/TP and HBP) is not relevant for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC for spontaneously hyperintense nodules on T1-weighted images in patients with liver cirrhosis.

The role of enhancing capsule and modified capsule appearances in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of using enhancing capsule (EC) or modified capsule appearance as a major feature in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI), and to explore the relationship between the imaging features and the histological fibrous capsule.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 342 hepatic lesions ≤ 3.0 cm in 319 patients that underwent Gd-EOB-MRIs from January 2018 to March 2021. During dynamic phases and hepatobiliary phase, the modified capsule appearance added the nonenhancing capsule (NEC) (modified LI-RADS + NEC) or corona enhancement (CoE) (modified LI-RADS + CoE) to EC as an alternative capsule appearance. Inter-reader agreement of imaging features was assessed. The diagnostic performances of LI-RADS, LI-RADS with EC ignored, and two modified LI-RADS were compared, followed by Bonferroni correction. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify the independent features associated with the histological fibrous capsule.

RESULTS

The inter-reader agreement on EC (0.64) was lower than that on the NEC alternative (0.71) but better than that on CoE alternative (0.58). For HCC diagnosis, compared to LI-RADS, LI-RADS with EC ignored showed significantly lower sensitivity (72.7% vs. 67.4%, p < 0.001) with comparable specificity (89.3% vs. 90.7%, p = 1.000). Two modified LI-RADS showed slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity than LI-RADS, without statistical significance (all p ≥ 0.006). The AUC was highest with modified LI-RADS + NEC (0.82). Both EC and NEC were significantly associated with the fibrous capsule (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EC appearance improved the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI. Considering NEC as an alternative capsule appearance allowed for better inter-reader reliability and comparable diagnostic ability.

KEY POINTS

• Using the enhancing capsule as a major feature in LI-RADS significantly improved the sensitivity of diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm without reducing specificity on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. • Compared to the corona enhancement, the nonenhancing capsule might be a preferable alternative capsule appearance for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm. • Capsule appearance should be considered a major feature in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm, regardless whether the capsule appears to be enhancing or nonenhancing.

LI-RADS Made Easy

PURPOSE

 The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v2018) standardizes the interpretation and reporting of MDCT and MRI examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 For focal liver lesions (called "observations") it assigns categories (LR-1 to 5, LR-M, LR-TIV, LR-TR), which reflect the probability of benignity or malignancy (HCC or other non-HCC malignancies) of the respective observation. The categories assigned are based on major and ancillary image features, which have been developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR), revised several times (now v2018), and validated in many studies. The value of ancillary features to modify LI-RADS categories assigned to observations based on major features is shown.

RESULTS

 This review summarizes the relevant CT and MRI features and presents a step-by-step approach for readers not familiar with LI-RADS on how to use the system. Relevant imaging features and the value of different modalities (contrast-enhanced CT, MRI with extracellular gadolinium chelates or liver-specific contrast agents) is explained.

CONCLUSION

 The widespread adoption of LI-RADS for CT/MRI reporting in high-risk patients would help to reduce inter-reader variability. It could improve communication between radiologists, oncologists, hepatologists, pathologists, and liver surgeons, and lead to better patient management.

KEY POINTS

  · LI-RADS has been developed and revised to address the need for improved diagnosis and standardized categorization of findings in chronic liver disease.. · CT/MRI LI-RADS consists of major criteria and ancillary features to classify observations.. · LI-RADS terminology helps to clarify the communication of liver observations between radiologists and referring physicians..

CITATION FORMAT

· Schima W, Kopf H, Eisenhuber E. LI-RADS made Easy. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1990-5924.

Preoperative differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma with peripheral rim-like enhancement from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced MRI

Purpose

The present study aimed to determine the reliable imaging features to distinguish atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with peripheral rim-like enhancement from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

A total of 168 patients (130 male, 57.10 ± 10.53 years) pathological confirmed HCC or IMCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between July 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent differential factors for distinguishing HCC from IMCC, and the model was established. Bootstrap resampling 1000 times was used to verify the model, which was visualized by nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Results

Radiological capsule (OR 0.024, 95% CI: 0.006, 0.095, P<0.001), heterogeneous signal intensity (SI) on T1WI (OR 0.009, 95%CI: 0.001,0.056, P<0.001) were independent differential factors for predicting HCC over IMCC. A lobulated contour (OR 11.732, 95%CI: 2.928,47.007, P = 0.001), target sign on DP (OR 14.269, 95%CI: 2.849,82.106, P = 0.007), bile duct dilatation (OR 12.856, 95%CI: 2.013, P = 0.001) were independent differential factors for predicting IMCCs over HCCs. The independent differential factors constituted a model to distinguish atypical HCCs and IMCCs. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity values of the model were 0.964(0.940,0.987), 0.88, and 0.906, indicating that the model had an excellent differential diagnostic performance. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve showed that the model obtained a better net clinical benefit.

Conclusion

The present study identified reliable imaging features for distinguishing atypical HCCs with peripheral rim-like enhancement from IMCCs on contrast-enhanced MRI. Our findings may help radiologists provide clinicians with more accurate preoperative imaging diagnoses to select appropriate treatment options.

A preoperative model based on gadobenate-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinomas (≤ 5 cm)

Purpose

The present study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative model based on gadobenate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) size of ≤5 cm. In order to provide preoperative guidance for clinicians to optimize treatment options.

Methods

164 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC and preoperative gadobenate-enhanced MRI from July 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression (forward LR) analyses were used to determine the predictors of MVI and the model was established. Four-fold cross validation was used to verify the model, which was visualized by nomograms. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Results

Elevated alpha-fetoprotein (HR 1.849, 95% CI: 1.193, 2.867, P=0.006), atypical enhancement pattern (HR 3.441, 95% CI: 1.523, 7.772, P=0.003), peritumoral hypointensity on HBP (HR 7.822, 95% CI: 3.317, 18.445, P<0.001), and HBP hypointensity (HR 3.258, 95% CI: 1.381, 7.687, P=0.007) were independent risk factors to MVI and constituted the HBP model. The mean area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for the HBP model were as follows: 0.830 (95% CI: 0.784, 0.876), 0.71, 0.78, 0.81 in training set; 0.826 (95% CI:0.765, 0.887), 0.8, 0.7, 0.79 in test set. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve showed that the HBP model achieved great clinical benefits.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the HBP imaging features of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI play an important role in predicting MVI for HCC. A preoperative model, mainly based on HBP imaging features of gadobenate-enhanced MRI, was able to excellently predict the MVI for HCC size of ≤5cm. The model may help clinicians preoperatively assess the risk of MVI in HCC patients so as to guide clinicians to optimize treatment options.