Design, synthesis, in silico analysis with PPAR ‐γ receptor and study of non‐covalent interactions in unsymmetrical heterocyclic/phenyl fleximer

Discovery of New Dual-Target Agents Against PPAR-γ and α-Glucosidase Enzymes with Molecular Modeling Methods: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamic Simulations, and MM/PBSA Analysis

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become a serious public health problem both in our country and worldwide, being the most prevalent type of diabetes. The combined use of drugs in the treatment of T2DM leads to serious side effects, including gastrointestinal problems, liver toxicity, hypoglycemia, and treatment costs. Hence, there has been a growing emphasis on drugs that demonstrate dual interactions. Several studies have suggested that dual-target agents for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) and alpha-glucosidase (α-glucosidase) could be a potent approach for treating patients with diabetes. We aim to develop new antidiabetic agents that target PPAR-γ and α-glucosidase enzymes using molecular modeling techniques. These compounds show dual interactions, are more effective, and have fewer side effects. The molecular docking method was employed to investigate the enzyme-ligand interaction mechanisms of 159 newly designed compounds with target enzymes. Additionally, we evaluated the ADME properties and pharmacokinetic suitability of these compounds based on Lipinski and Veber's rules. Compound 70, which exhibited favorable ADME properties, demonstrated more effective binding energy with both PPAR-γ and α-glucosidase enzymes (-12,16 kcal/mol, -10.07 kcal/mol) compared to the reference compounds of Acetohexamide (-9.31 kcal/mol, -7.48 kcal/mol) and Glibenclamide (-11.12 kcal/mol, -8.66 kcal/mol). Further, analyses of MM/PBSA binding free energy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted for target enzymes with compound 70, which exhibited the most favorable binding affinities with both enzymes. Based on this information, our study aims to contribute to the development of new dual-target antidiabetic agents with improved efficacy, reduced side effects, and enhanced reliability for diabetes treatment.

Design, synthesis, and molecular modeling of heterodimer and inhibitors of α-amylase as hypoglycemic agents

A series of rosiglitazone-based heterodimers were designed and synthesized, and their α-amylase and antioxidant activity was evaluated. The binding mode of the compounds at the active site of PPARγ and α-amylase enzyme was explored using MolDock docking method. In molecular docking studies against crystal structure of PPARγ (PDB code: 1FM6), compounds 10 and 13 showed interaction with amino acids Arg379, Asp379, Asn385, Ala387, Glu388, Val389, Glu390, and Lys438. Docking results of α-amylase enzyme (PDB code: 5EOF) with compounds 10 and 13 showed excellent interaction with amino acids Ala169, Lys172, Asp173, Tyr174, Val175, Arg176, and Lys178. Depending on the docking score, the designed compounds were selectively prioritized for synthesis. All synthesized compounds were subjected to in vitro α-amylase activity and antioxidant activity. Compounds 10 and 13 were to possess higher potency than acarbose, and most of the compounds showed antioxidant activity. Additionally, the most active compound 10 was evaluated for in vivo anti-diabetic activity.

Natural Compound 3β,7β,25-trihydroxycucurbita-5,23(E)-dien-19-al from Momordica charantia Acts as PPARγ Ligand

Momordica charantia is a popular vegetable associated with effective complementary and alternative diabetes management in some parts of the world. However, the molecular mechanism is less commonly investigated. In this study, we investigated the association between a major cucurbitane triterpenoid isolated from M. charantia, 3β,7β,25-trihydroxycucurbita-5,23(E)-dien-19-al (THCB) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) activation and its related activities using cell culture and molecular biology techniques. In this study, we report on both M. charantia fruit crude extract and THCB in driving the luciferase activity of Peroxisome Proliferator Response Element, associated with PPARγ activation. Other than that, THCB also induced adipocyte differentiation at far less intensity as compared to the full agonist rosiglitazone. In conjunction, THCB treatment on adipocytes also resulted in upregulation of PPAR gamma target genes expression; AP2, adiponectin, LPL and CD34 at a lower magnitude compared to rosiglitazone's induction. THCB also induced glucose uptake into muscle cells and the mechanism is via Glut4 translocation to the cell membrane. In conclusion, THCB acts as one of the many components in M. charantia to induce hypoglycaemic effect by acting as PPARγ ligand and inducing glucose uptake activity in the muscles by means of Glut4 translocation.