Graft Fibrosis Over 10 to 15 Years in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Multicenter Study of Paired, Longitudinal Surveillance Biopsies

Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

Balancing immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation: Playing the long game

The overarching goal in the care of pediatric liver transplant recipients is to optimize allograft and patient health. Balancing immunosuppression to maintain allograft health while avoiding medication side effects is essential for long-term survival and optimal quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Utilizing precision medicine to personalize immunosuppression, which includes minimization and withdrawal, is core to this effort. The unique anatomy and physiology of the liver make it more tolerant to immune-mediated injury and a more favorable organ for immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal. However, several challenges exist. Standard biochemical values and histologic features may not reliably predict allograft health after a reduction in immunosuppression. Additionally, biochemical values alone do not reliably identify which patients can successfully develop operational tolerance, as there may be occult allograft injury despite normal liver enzymes. Finally, the durability of tolerance after successful reduction in immunosuppression remains uncertain over time. Innovative tools show promise in circumventing these challenges, but more research is needed to determine actual clinical utility. While immunosuppression-free transplant may not be a current reality for most pediatric liver transplant recipients, strategies to safely minimize immunosuppression without compromising allograft health are within reach. Each liver allograft and recipient pair requires a different degree of immune modulation, and through a structured process of minimization and withdrawal, immunosuppression can indeed be tailored in a precise, personalized way to optimize outcomes. This review focuses on the progress that has been made to individualize immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation to ensure optimal allograft and recipient health.

Long-term Outcome of Asymptomatic Patients With Graft Fibrosis in Protocol Biopsies After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The histological prevalence of allograft fibrosis in asymptomatic children after liver transplantation (LT) is well documented. However, long-term graft and patient survival remain unclear. This retrospective multicenter study aims to determine the prevalence of allograft fibrosis and analyze the long-term outcome for patients transplanted in childhood.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical data of children who had undergone 10-y protocol liver biopsies. We excluded patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis B or C, and retransplantation. In total, 494 patients transplanted in childhood across 12 international transplant centers were included. We evaluated the development of fibrosis by comparing the results with biopsies obtained 5 and 15 y post-LT. Histological findings were correlated with graft and patient survival up to 20 y post-LT.

RESULTS

In the 10-y biopsies, periportal or pericentral fibrosis was observed in 253 patients (51%), 87 (18%) had bridging fibrosis, 30 (6%) had cirrhosis, and 124 (25%) had no fibrosis. The prevalence and stage of graft fibrosis significantly progressed from 5 to 10 y. At 10 y, the severity of fibrosis correlated significantly with inflammation. Patients with graft cirrhosis in the 10-y biopsy were more likely to die or require retransplantation subsequently ( P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

At 10 y post-LT, most patients transplanted in childhood developed fibrosis, based on the protocol liver biopsies. Although mild-to-moderate graft fibrosis did not largely affect patient or graft survival up to 20 y post-LT, this progressive fibrosis finding has substantial implications for developing cirrhosis and portal hypertension in adult care.

A Comprehensive Review of Liver Allograft Fibrosis and Steatosis: From Cause to Diagnosis

Despite advances in posttransplant care, long-term outcomes for liver transplant recipients remain unchanged. Approximately 25% of recipients will advance to graft cirrhosis and require retransplantation. Graft fibrosis progresses in the context of de novo or recurrent disease. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection was previously the most important cause of graft failure but is now curable in the majority of patients. However, with an increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplantation, metabolic dysfunction-associated liver injury is anticipated to become an important cause of graft fibrosis alongside alloimmune hepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. To better understand the landscape of the graft fibrosis literature, we summarize the associated epidemiology, cause, potential mechanisms, diagnosis, and complications. We additionally highlight the need for better noninvasive methods to ameliorate the management of graft fibrosis. Some examples include leveraging the microbiome, genetic, and machine learning methods to address these limitations. Overall, graft fibrosis is routinely seen by transplant clinicians, but it requires a better understanding of its underlying biology and contributors that can help inform diagnostic and therapeutic practices.

Fibrosis and steatosis of the liver graft: Are non-invasive tests useful? A short review

As life expectancy of liver transplanted patients improves, new questions are arising to avoid progressive graft loss. The spectrum of chronic inflammation and fibrosis are known to be important triggers in the alteration of graft function. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard to better understand progressive, normal, and abnormal histological modifications of the graft. In parallel, the interest for metabolic steatosis development in post-transplantation is also growing. Long-term survival of these patients involves the management of comorbidities including metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. Early detection of altered graft parenchyma, and monitoring of its evolution are undoubtedly essential. Non-invasive methods including transient elastography and fibrosis biomarkers are attractive tools to avoid drawbacks and complications of liver biopsy. Accuracy of these methods are well-known in a pre-transplantation setting, but evidence is lacking in post-transplantation setting. We review current knowledge of progressive liver fibrosis and steatosis development after transplantation and non-invasive methods of their assessment.

Prognosis of Children Undergoing Liver Transplantation: A 30-Year European Study

OBJECTIVES

The European Liver Transplant Registry has been collecting data on virtually all pediatric liver transplant (PLT) procedures in Europe since 1968. We analyzed patient outcome over time and identified parameters associated with long-term patient outcome.

METHODS

Participating centers and European organ-sharing organizations provided retrospective data to the European Liver Transplant Registry. To identify trends, data were grouped into consecutive time spans: era A: before 2000, era B: 2000 to 2009, and the current era, era C: since 2010.

RESULTS

From June 1968 until December 2017, 16 641 PLT were performed on 14 515 children by 133 centers. The children <7 years of age represented 58% in era A, and 66% in the current era (P <.01). The main indications for PLT were congenital biliary diseases (44%) and metabolic diseases (18%). Patient survival at 5 years is currently 86% overall and 97% in children who survive the first year after PLT. The survival rate has improved from 74% in era A to 83% in era B and 85% in era C (P <.0001). Low-volume centers (<5 PLT/year) represented 75% of centers but performed only 19% of PLT and were associated with a decreased survival rate. In the current era, however, survival rates has become irrespective of volume. Infection is the leading cause of death (4.1%), followed by primary nonfunction of the graft (1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

PLT has become a highly successful medical treatment that should be considered for all children with end-stage liver disease. The main challenge for further improving the prognosis remains the early postoperative period.