1
|
Silvus A, Haefner J, Altman MB, Zhao T, Perkins S, Zhang T. Dosimetric evaluation of dose shaping by adaptive aperture and its impact on plan quality. Med Dosim 2023; 49:30-36. [PMID: 38087750 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Mevion's single-room HYPERSCAN proton therapy system employs a proton multileaf collimator called the adaptive aperture (AA), which collimates individual spots in the proton delivery as determined by the Treatment Planning System (TPS). The purpose of this study is to assess the dosimetric benefits of the AA, specifically in the dynamic aperture (DA) mode, and evaluate its impact on proton treatment plan quality as compared to a traditional pencil beam scanning (PBS) system (Varian ProBeam). The spot dose distributions with dynamic collimation (DA), a unique AA shape for each energy layer, and with static collimation (SA), a single AA collimation shape shared by all energy layers per field, were calculated and compared with the spot dose distribution of the Varian ProBeam proton therapy system. The lateral and distal dose falloff gradients and their dependence on air gap were evaluated quantitatively. Treatment plans for ten arbitrarily selected intracranial target image sets were created, and the HYPERSCAN and ProBeam beam models were compared. The spot sizes of the HYPERSCAN system are significantly larger than ProBeam system, especially at low energy. With the help of DA, the lateral dose penumbra of the HYPERSCAN is dramatically improved at lower energy and comparable at higher to ProBeam PBS beams. While the ProBeam spot size does not change with the air gap, beam penumbra of the HYPERSCAN with DA increases with the air gap. The distal dose falloff gradient for the HYPERSCAN with or without DA remains consistently around 4.8 mm through all energies due to the beamline design, not substantially varying with energy or air gap. Treatment plans of ten randomly selected intracranial cases demonstrated favorable OAR sparing but unfavorable dose uniformity for the HYPERSCAN with DA compared to ProBeam. Dose shaping by adaptive aperture substantially improves the lateral penumbra without a significant change in the distal dose gradient. The dose gradients of the multiple beam DA plans with layer-by-layer blocking are improved compared with SA plans and are close to the ProBeam plans for the ten randomly selected brain cases. With layer-by-layer DA blocking, the HYPERSCAN plans have similar plan conformality indices as the ProBeam plans, but the overall plan quality indices are lower than ProBeam plans, largely due to the lower dose homogeneity. In some cases, DA blocking was found to be superior in sparing OAR surrounding the target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Silvus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jonathan Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Michael B Altman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janson M, Glimelius L, Fredriksson A, Traneus E, Engwall E. Treatment planning of scanned proton beams in RayStation. Med Dosim 2023; 49:2-12. [PMID: 37996354 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
The use of scanned proton beams in external beam radiation therapy has seen a rapid development over the past decade. This technique places new demands on treatment planning, as compared to conventional photon-based radiation therapy. In this article, several proton specific functions as implemented in the treatment planning system RayStation are presented. We will cover algorithms for energy layer and spot selection, basic optimization including the handling of spot weight limits, optimization of the linear energy transfer (LET) distribution, robust optimization including the special case of 4D optimization, proton arc planning, and automatic planning using deep learning. We will further present the Monte Carlo (MC) proton dose engine in RayStation to some detail, from the material interpretation of the CT data, through the beam model parameterization, to the actual MC transport mechanism. Useful tools for plan evaluation, including robustness evaluation, and the versatile scripting interface are also described. The overall aim of the paper is to give an overview of some of the key proton planning functions in RayStation, with example usages, and at the same time provide the details about the underlying algorithms that previously have not been fully publicly available.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan HQ, Lew KS, Koh CWY, Wibawa A, Yeap PL, Master Z, Lee JCL, Beltran CJ, Park SY, Furutani KM. Implementing dispersion measurement as part of scanning proton therapy commissioning and quality assurance. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:225001. [PMID: 37857314 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. Dispersion in an accelerator quantifies the deviation of the proton trajectory when there is a momentum deviation. We present for the first time a safe method of measuring dispersion in the clinic, using a scintillator detector and the momentum deviations within a spill. This is an important accelerator quantity as we found that this is the reason behind the large dose fluctuation in our absolute dosimetry measurement.Methods. Dispersions are measured for nine energies in a Hitachi ProBeat system at three locations (isocenter and at two profile monitors) and at two gantry angles (0 and 90 degrees) by first measuring the spot position and momentum drift within a spill. The spot position drift is measured by the XRV-4000 at the isocenter, and by the two profile monitors located at 0.57 and 2.27 m from the isocenter. The momentum drift is calculated from the intra-spill range drift which is measured using the Ranger accessory. The dispersion at isocenter and its gradient are calculated using the weighted least square regression on the measured dispersions at the three locations. A constraint is formulated on the dispersion and its gradient to ensure minimal intra-spill spot position deviation around the isocenter.Results. The measured intra-spill range and spot positional drift at isocenter are less than0.25mmand0.7mmrespectively. The momentum spread calculated from the range drift are less than 0.08%. The dispersion at the isocenter ranged from0.50to4.30mand the zero-crossing happens upstream of isocenter for all energies. 2 of the 9 energies (168.0 and 187.5 MeV) violated the constraint and has an intra-spill spot positional deviation greater than1.0within5cmfrom the isocenter.Conclusion. This measurement is recommended as part of commissioning and annual quality assurance for accelerator monitoring and to ensure intra-spill spot deviations remain low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Andrew Wibawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zubin Master
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Keith M Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nelson NP, Culberson WS, Hyer DE, Geoghegan TJ, Patwardhan KA, Smith BR, Flynn RT, Gutiérrez AN, Boland T, Hill PM. Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 9:065024. [PMID: 37832529 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad02ff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To integrate a Dynamic Collimation System (DCS) into a pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy system and validate its dosimetric impact.Approach.Uncollimated and collimated treatment fields were developed for clinically relevant targets using an in-house treatment plan optimizer and an experimentally validated Monte Carlo model of the DCS and IBA dedicated nozzle (DN) system. The dose reduction induced by the DCS was quantified by calculating the mean dose in 10- and 30-mm two-dimensional rinds surrounding the target. A select number of plans were then used to experimentally validate the mechanical integration of the DCS and beam scanning controller system through measurements with the MatriXX-PT ionization chamber array and EBT3 film. Absolute doses were verified at the central axis at various depths using the IBA MatriXX-PT and PPC05 ionization chamber.Main results.Simulations demonstrated a maximum mean dose reduction of 12% for the 10 mm rind region and 45% for the 30 mm rind region when utilizing the DCS. Excellent agreement was observed between Monte Carlo simulations, EBT3 film, and MatriXX-PT measurements, with gamma pass rates exceeding 94.9% for all tested plans at the 3%/2 mm criterion. Absolute central axis doses showed an average verification difference of 1.4% between Monte Carlo and MatriXX-PT/PPC05 measurements.Significance.We have successfully dosimetrically validated the delivery of dynamically collimated proton therapy for clinically relevant delivery patterns and dose distributions with the DCS. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to assess dose reductions and treatment planning considerations associated with the DCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Nelson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Wesley S Culberson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Theodore J Geoghegan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Kaustubh A Patwardhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Alonso N Gutiérrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 331765, United States of America
| | | | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herrick M, Penfold S, Santos A, Hickson K. A systematic review of volumetric image guidance in proton therapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:963-975. [PMID: 37382744 PMCID: PMC10480289 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01294-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, proton therapy centres have begun to shift from conventional 2D-kV imaging to volumetric imaging systems for image guided proton therapy (IGPT). This is likely due to the increased commercial interest and availability of volumetric imaging systems, as well as the shift from passively scattered proton therapy to intensity modulated proton therapy. Currently, there is no standard modality for volumetric IGPT, leading to variation between different proton therapy centres. This article reviews the reported clinical use of volumetric IGPT, as available in published literature, and summarises their utilisation and workflow where possible. In addition, novel volumetric imaging systems are also briefly summarised highlighting their potential benefits for IGPT and the challenges that need to be overcome before they can be used clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Herrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Scott Penfold
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alexandre Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kevin Hickson
- SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, Australia
- University of South Australia, Allied Health & Human Performance, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pennock M, Wei S, Cheng C, Lin H, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Bakst RL, Kabarriti R, Simone II CB, Lee NY, Kang M, Press RH. Proton Bragg Peak FLASH Enables Organ Sparing and Ultra-High Dose-Rate Delivery: Proof of Principle in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3828. [PMID: 37568644 PMCID: PMC10417542 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90-100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Shouyi Wei
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology—Radiation Oncology Associates, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Charles B. Simone II
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Robert H. Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nelson NP, Culberson WS, Hyer DE, Geoghegan TJ, Patwardhan KA, Smith BR, Flynn RT, Yu J, Gutiérrez AN, Hill PM. Dosimetric delivery validation of dynamically collimated pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:055003. [PMID: 36706460 PMCID: PMC9940016 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb6cd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy target dose conformity can be improved with energy layer-specific collimation. One such collimator is the dynamic collimation system (DCS), which consists of four nickel trimmer blades that intercept the scanning beam as it approaches the lateral extent of the target. While the dosimetric benefits of the DCS have been demonstrated through computational treatment planning studies, there has yet to be experimental verification of these benefits for composite multi-energy layer fields. The objective of this work is to dosimetrically characterize and experimentally validate the delivery of dynamically collimated proton therapy with the DCS equipped to a clinical PBS system.Approach. Optimized single field, uniform dose treatment plans for 3 × 3 × 3 cm3target volumes were generated using Monte Carlo dose calculations with depths ranging from 5 to 15 cm, trimmer-to-surface distances ranging from 5 to 18.15 cm, with and without a 4 cm thick polyethylene range shifter. Treatment plans were then delivered to a water phantom using a prototype DCS and an IBA dedicated nozzle system and measured with a Zebra multilayer ionization chamber, a MatriXX PT ionization chamber array, and Gafchromic™ EBT3 film.Main results. For measurements made within the SOBPs, average 2D gamma pass rates exceeded 98.5% for the MatriXX PT and 96.5% for film at the 2%/2 mm criterion across all measured uncollimated and collimated plans, respectively. For verification of the penumbra width reduction with collimation, film agreed with Monte Carlo with differences within 0.3 mm on average compared to 0.9 mm for the MatriXX PT.Significance. We have experimentally verified the delivery of DCS-collimated fields using a clinical PBS system and commonly available dosimeters and have also identified potential weaknesses for dosimeters subject to steep dose gradients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Nelson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America,Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | - Wesley S Culberson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Theodore J Geoghegan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Kaustubh A Patwardhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Jen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, United States of America
| | - Alonso N Gutiérrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, United States of America
| | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Newpower MA, Chiang BH, Ahmad S, Chen Y. Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13911. [PMID: 36748663 PMCID: PMC10161119 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to assess the robustness of treatment plans when spot delivery errors were predicted with a machine learning (ML) model for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Over 6000 machine log files from delivered IMPT treatment plans were included in this study. From these log files, over 4.1 × $ \times \ $ 106 delivered proton spots were used to train the ML model. The presented model was tested and used to predict the spot position as well as the monitor units (MU) per spot, based on the original planning parameters. Two patient plans (one accelerated partial breast irradiation [APBI] and one ependymoma) were recalculated with the predicted spot position/MUs by the ML model and then were re-analyzed for robustness. Plans with ML predicted spots were less robust than the original clinical plans. In the APBI plan, dosimetric changes to the left lung and heart were not clinically relevant. In the ependymoma plan, the hot spot in the brainstem decreased and the hot spot in the cervical cord increased. Despite these differences, after robustness analysis, both ML spot delivery error plans resulted in >95% of the CTV receiving >95% of the prescription dose. The presented workflow has the potential benefit of including realistic spots information for plan quality checks in IMPT. This work demonstrates that in the two example plans, the plans were still robust when accounting for spot delivery errors as predicted by the ML model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Newpower
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Bing-Hao Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Salahuddin Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tominaga Y, Sakurai Y, Miyata J, Harada S, Akagi T, Oita M. Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi-leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13817. [PMID: 36420959 PMCID: PMC9797166 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical beam commissioning results and lateral penumbra characteristics of our new pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) calculated by use of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. Eighteen collimated uniform dose plans for cubic targets were optimized by the RayStation 9A treatment planning system (TPS), varying scan area, modulation widths, measurement depths, and collimator angles. To test the patient-specific measurements, we also created and verified five clinically realistic PBS plans with the MLC, such as the liver, prostate, base-of-skull, C-shape, and head-and-neck. The verification measurements consist of the depth dose (DD), lateral profile (LP), and absolute dose (AD). We compared the LPs and ADs between the calculation and measurements. For the cubic plans, the gamma index pass rates (γ-passing) were on average 96.5% ± 4.0% at 3%/3 mm for the DD and 95.2% ± 7.6% at 2%/2 mm for the LP. In several LP measurements less than 75 mm depths, the γ-passing deteriorated (increased the measured doses) by less than 90% with the scattering such as the MLC edge and range shifter. The deteriorated γ-passing was satisfied by more than 90% at 2%/2 mm using uncollimated beams instead of collimated beams except for three planes. The AD differences and the lateral penumbra width (80%-20% distance) were within ±1.9% and ± 1.1 mm, respectively. For the clinical plan measurements, the γ-passing of LP at 2%/2 mm and the AD differences were 97.7% ± 4.2% on average and within ±1.8%, respectively. The measurements were in good agreement with the calculations of both the cubic and clinical plans inserted in the MLC except for LPs less than 75 mm regions of some cubic and clinical plans. The calculation errors in collimated beams can be mitigated by substituting uncollimated beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Tominaga
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Co. HakuhokaiOsaka Proton Therapy ClinicOsakaJapan,Division of Radiological TechnologyGraduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health SystemsOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan
| | - Yusuke Sakurai
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Co. HakuhokaiOsaka Proton Therapy ClinicOsakaJapan
| | - Junya Miyata
- Division of Radiological TechnologyGraduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health SystemsOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan,Department of Radiological technologyKurashiki Central HospitalOkayamaJapan
| | | | | | - Masataka Oita
- Division of Radiological TechnologyGraduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health SystemsOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wei S, Lin H, Shi C, Xiong W, Chen CC, Huang S, Press RH, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Simone CB, Kang M. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver hypofractionated radiation therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:6560-6574. [PMID: 35929404 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The transmission proton FLASH technique delivers high doses to the normal tissue distal to the target, which is less conformal compared to the Bragg peak technique. To investigate FLASH RT planning using single-energy Bragg peak beams with a similar beam arrangement as clinical intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to characterize the plan quality, dose sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs), and FLASH dose rate percentage. MATERIALS AND METHODS An in-house platform was developed to enable inverse IMPT-FLASH planning using single-energy Bragg peaks. A universal range shifter and range compensators were utilized to effectively align the Bragg peak to the distal edge of the target. Two different minimum MU settings of 400 and 800 MU/spot (Bragg-400MU and Bragg-800MU) plans were investigated on 10 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients previously treated by IMPT-SBRT to evaluate the FLASH dose and dose rate coverage for OARs. The IMPT-FLASH using single-energy Bragg peaks delivered 50 Gy in 5 fractions with similar or identical beam arrangement to the clinical IMPT-SBRT plans. NRG GI003 dose constraint metrics were used. Three dose rate calculation methods, including average dose rate (ADR), dose threshold dose rate (DTDR), and dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), were all studied. RESULTS The novel spot map optimization can fulfill the inverse planning using single-energy Bragg peaks. All the Bragg peak FLASH plans achieved similar results for the liver-GTV Dmean and heart D0.5cc , compared to SBRT-IMPT. The Bragg-800MU plans resulted in 18.3% higher CTV D2cc compared with SBRT (p < 0.05), and no significant difference was found between Bragg-400MU and SBRT plans. For the CTV Dmax , SBRT plans resulted in 10.3% (p<0.01) less than Bragg-400MU plans and 16.6% (p<0.01) less than Bragg-800MU plans. The Bragg-800MU plans generally achieved higher ADR, DADR, and DTDR dose rates than Bragg-400MU plans, and DADR mostly led to the highest V40Gy/s compared to other dose rate calculation methods, whereas ADR led to the lowest. The lower dose rate portions in certain OARs are related to the lower dose deposited due to the farther distances from targets, especially in the penumbra of the beams. CONCLUSION Single-energy Bragg peak IMPT-FLASH plans eliminate the exit dose in normal tissues, maintaining comparable dose metrics to the conventional IMPT-SBRT plans while achieving a sufficient FLASH dose rate for liver cancers. This study demonstrates the feasibility of and sufficiently high dose rate when applying Bragg peak FLASH treatment for liver cancer hypofractionated FLASH therapy. The advancement of this novel method has the potential to optimize treatment for liver cancer patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyi Wei
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Frame CM, Chen Y, Gagnon J, Yuan Y, Ma T, Dritschilo A, Pang D. Proton induced DNA double strand breaks at the Bragg peak: Evidence of enhanced LET effect. Front Oncol 2022; 12:930393. [PMID: 35992825 PMCID: PMC9388940 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.930393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo investigate DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by therapeutic proton beams in plateau and Bragg peak to demonstrate DSB induction due to the higher LET in the Bragg peak.Materials and MethodspUC19 plasmid DNA samples were irradiated to doses of 1000 and 3000 Gy on a Mevion S250i proton system with a monoenergetic, 110 MeV, proton beam at depths of 2 and 9.4 cm, corresponding to a position on the plateau and distal Bragg peak of the beam, respectively. The irradiated DNA samples were imaged by atomic force microscopy for visualization of individual DNA molecules, either broken or intact, and quantification of the DNA fragment length distributions for each of the irradiated samples. Percentage of the broken DNA and average number of DSBs per DNA molecule were obtained.ResultsCompared to irradiation effects in the plateau region, DNA irradiated at the Bragg peak sustained more breakage at the same dose, yielding more short DNA fragments and higher numbers of DSB per DNA molecule.ConclusionThe higher LET of proton beams at the Bragg peak results in more densely distributed DNA DSBs, which supports an underlying mechanism for the increased cell killing by protons at the Bragg peak.
Collapse
|
12
|
Schneider T. Technical aspects of proton minibeam radiation therapy: Minibeam generation and delivery. Phys Med 2022; 100:64-71. [PMID: 35750002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the normal tissue sparing of sub-millimetric, spatially fractionated beams with the improved ballistics of protons. This may allow a safe dose escalation in the tumour and has already proven to provide a remarkable increase of the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas in animal experiments. One of the main challenges in pMBRT concerns the generation of minibeams and the implementation in a clinical environment. This article reviews the different approaches for generating minibeams, using mechanical collimators and focussing magnets, and discusses the technical aspects of the implementation and delivery of pMBRT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kang M, Wei S, Choi JI, Lin H, Simone CB 2nd. A Universal Range Shifter and Range Compensator Can Enable Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Single-Energy Bragg Peak FLASH-RT Treatment Using Current Commercially Available Proton Systems. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022:S0360-3016(22)00019-0. [PMID: 35101597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transmission beams have been proposed for ultra-high dose (or FLASH) proton planning, limiting the organ sparing potentials of proton therapy. By pulling back the ranges of the highest energy proton beams and compensating proton ranges to adapt to the target distally, the exit dose of proton beams can be eliminated to better protect organs at risk while still preserving FLASH dose rate delivery. METHOD AND MATERIALS An inverse planning tool was developed to optimize intensity modulated proton therapy using a single-energy layer for FLASH radiation therapy planning. The range pull-backs were calculated to stop single-energy proton beams at the distal edge of the target. The spot map and weights of each field were optimized to achieve a sufficient dose rate using proton beam Bragg peaks. A C-shape target in phantom, along with 6 consecutive lung cancer patients previously treated using proton stereotactic body radiation therapy were planned using this novel Bragg Peak method and also transmission technique. Dosimetry characteristics and 3-dimensional dose rate were investigated. RESULTS The minimum monitor units (MU) for transmission and Bragg peak plans were 400 MU/spot and 1200 MU/spot, respectively, corresponding to spot peak dose rates of 670 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) per second and 1950 GyRBE per second. Bragg peak plans yield a generally comparable target uniformity while significantly reducing dose spillage volume from the low to medium dose level. For all the 6 lung cases delivery of 34 GyRBE in 1 fraction, assessing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0915 constraints, the lung V7GyRBE volume was reduced by up to 32% (P = .001) for Bragg peak plans. The transmission plans tended to generate 2.4% higher FLASH dose rate coverage (V40GyRBE/s) versus Bragg peak plans over the major organs at risk. However, Bragg peak plans could also reach the FLASH radiation therapy threshold of V40GyRBE/s using a higher MU/spot and sophisticated dose-rate optimization algorithm. CONCLUSIONS This first proof-of-concept study has demonstrated this novel method of combining range pull-back and powerful inverse optimization capable of achieving FLASH dose rate based on currently available machine parameters using a single-energy Bragg peak. Similar target coverage and uniformity can be maintained by Bragg peak FLASH plans while substantially improving the sparing of organs at risk compared with transmission plans.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wei S, Lin H, Choi JI, Press RH, Lazarev S, Kabarriti R, Hajj C, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Simone CB, Kang M. FLASH Radiotherapy Using Single-Energy Proton PBS Transmission Beams for Hypofractionation Liver Cancer: Dose and Dose Rate Quantification. Front Oncol 2022; 11:813063. [PMID: 35096620 PMCID: PMC8794777 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.813063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This work aims to study the dose and ultra-high-dose rate characteristics of transmission proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH radiotherapy (RT) for hypofractionation liver cancer based on the parameters of a commercially available proton system operating under FLASH mode. METHODS AND MATERIALS An in-house treatment planning software (TPS) was developed to perform intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) FLASH-RT planning. Single-energy transmission proton PBS plans of 4.5 Gy × 15 fractions were optimized for seven consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients, using 2 and 5 fields combined with 1) the minimum MU/spot chosen between 100 and 400, and minimum spot time (MST) of 2 ms, and 2) the minimum MU/spot of 100, and MST of 0.5 ms, based upon considerations in target uniformities, OAR dose constraints, and OAR FLASH dose rate coverage. Then, the 3D average dose rate distribution was calculated. The dose metrics for the mean dose of Liver-GTV and other major OARs were characterized to evaluate the dose quality for the different combinations of field numbers and minimum spot times compared to that of conventional IMPT plans. Dose rate quality was evaluated using 40 Gy/s volume coverage (V40Gy/s). RESULTS All plans achieved favorable and comparable target uniformities, and target uniformity improved as the number of fields increased. For OARs, no significant dose differences were observed between plans of different field numbers and the same MST. For plans using shorter MST and the same field numbers, better sparing was generally observed in most OARs and was statistically significant for the chest wall. However, the FLASH dose rate coverage V40Gy/s was increased by 20% for 2-field plans compared to 5-field plans in most OARs with 2-ms MST, which was less evident in the 0.5-ms cases. For 2-field plans, dose metrics and V40Gy/s of select OARs have large variations due to the beam angle selection and variable distances to the targets. The transmission plans generally yielded inferior dosimetric quality to the conventional IMPT plans. CONCLUSION This is the first attempt to assess liver FLASH treatment planning and demonstrates that it is challenging for hypofractionation with smaller fractional doses (4.5 Gy/fraction). Using fewer fields can allow higher minimum MU/spot, resulting in higher OAR FLASH dose rate coverages while achieving similar plan quality compared to plans with more fields. Shorter MST can result in better plan quality and comparable or even better FLASH dose rate coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyi Wei
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Carla Hajj
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yap J, De Franco A, Sheehy S. Future Developments in Charged Particle Therapy: Improving Beam Delivery for Efficiency and Efficacy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:780025. [PMID: 34956897 PMCID: PMC8697351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.780025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The physical and clinical benefits of charged particle therapy (CPT) are well recognized. However, the availability of CPT and complete exploitation of dosimetric advantages are still limited by high facility costs and technological challenges. There are extensive ongoing efforts to improve upon these, which will lead to greater accessibility, superior delivery, and therefore better treatment outcomes. Yet, the issue of cost remains a primary hurdle as utility of CPT is largely driven by the affordability, complexity and performance of current technology. Modern delivery techniques are necessary but limited by extended treatment times. Several of these aspects can be addressed by developments in the beam delivery system (BDS) which determines the overall shaping and timing capabilities enabling high quality treatments. The energy layer switching time (ELST) is a limiting constraint of the BDS and a determinant of the beam delivery time (BDT), along with the accelerator and other factors. This review evaluates the delivery process in detail, presenting the limitations and developments for the BDS and related accelerator technology, toward decreasing the BDT. As extended BDT impacts motion and has dosimetric implications for treatment, we discuss avenues to minimize the ELST and overview the clinical benefits and feasibility of a large energy acceptance BDS. These developments support the possibility of advanced modalities and faster delivery for a greater range of treatment indications which could also further reduce costs. Further work to realize methodologies such as volumetric rescanning, FLASH, arc, multi-ion and online image guided therapies are discussed. In this review we examine how increased treatment efficiency and efficacy could be achieved with improvements in beam delivery and how this could lead to faster and higher quality treatments for the future of CPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacinta Yap
- School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrea De Franco
- IFMIF Accelerator Development Group, Rokkasho Fusion Institute, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Aomori, Japan
| | - Suzie Sheehy
- School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wei S, Lin H, Choi JI, Simone CB, Kang M. A Novel Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH RT Delivery Method Enables Optimal OAR Sparing and Ultra-High Dose Rate Delivery: A Comprehensive Dosimetry Study for Lung Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5790. [PMID: 34830946 PMCID: PMC8616118 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While transmission proton beams have been demonstrated to achieve ultra-high dose rate FLASH therapy delivery, they are unable to spare normal tissues distal to the target. This study aims to compare FLASH treatment planning using single energy Bragg peak proton beams versus transmission proton beams in lung tumors and to evaluate Bragg peak plan optimization, characterize plan quality, and quantify organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Both Bragg peak and transmission plans were optimized using an in-house platform for 10 consecutive lung patients previously treated with proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To bring the dose rate up to the FLASH-RT threshold, Bragg peak plans with a minimum MU/spot of 1200 and transmission plans with a minimum MU/spot of 400 were developed. Two common prescriptions, 34 Gy in 1 fraction and 54 Gy in 3 fractions, were studied with the same beam arrangement for both Bragg peak and transmission plans (n = 40 plans). RTOG 0915 dosimetry metrics and dose rate metrics based on different dose rate calculations, including average dose rate (ADR), dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and dose threshold dose rate (DTDR), were investigated. We then evaluated the effect of beam angular optimization on the Bragg peak plans to explore the potential for superior OAR sparing. RESULTS Bragg peak plans significantly reduced doses to several OAR dose parameters, including lung V7.4Gy and V7Gy by 32.0% (p < 0.01) and 30.4% (p < 0.01) for 34Gy/fx plans, respectively; and by 40.8% (p < 0.01) and 41.2% (p < 0.01) for 18Gy/fx plans, respectively, compared with transmission plans. Bragg peak plans have ~3% less in DADR and ~10% differences in mean OARs in DTDR and DADR relative to transmission plans due to the larger portion of lower dose regions of Bragg peak plans. With angular optimization, optimized Bragg peak plans can further reduce the lung V7Gy by 20.7% (p < 0.01) and V7.4Gy by 19.7% (p < 0.01) compared with Bragg peak plans without angular optimization while achieving a similar 3D dose rate distribution. CONCLUSION The single-energy Bragg peak plans achieve superior dosimetry performances in OARs to transmission plans with comparable dose rate performances for lung cancer FLASH therapy. Beam angle optimization can further improve the OAR dosimetry parameters with similar 3D FLASH dose rate coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grewal HS, Ahmad S, Jin H. Dosimetric study of the interplay effect using three-dimensional motion phantom in proton pencil beam scanning treatment of moving thoracic tumours. J Radiother Pract. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
The dosimetric and clinical advantages offered by implementation of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving thoracic tumours is hindered by interplay effect. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of large proton beam spot size along with adaptive aperture (AA) and various motion mitigation techniques on the interplay effect for a range of motion amplitudes in a three-dimensional (3D) respiratory motion phantom.
Materials and Methods:
Point doses using ionisation chamber (IC) and planner dose distributions with radiochromic film were compared against the corresponding treatment planning system (TPS) information. A 3D respiratory motion phantom was scanned either for static or 4D computed tomographic (CT) technique for 6-, 10- and 14-mm motion amplitudes in SI direction. For free breathing (FB) treatment, a tumour was contoured on maximum intensity projection scan and an average scan was used for treatment planning. Each FB treatment was delivered with one, three and five volumetric repaintings (VRs). Three phases (CT40–60%) were extracted from the 4D-CT scans of each motion amplitude for the respiratory-gated treatment and were used for the treatment planning and delivery. All treatment plans were made using AA and robustly optimised with 5-mm set-up and 3·5% density uncertainty. A total of 26 treatment plans were delivered to IC and film using static, dynamic and respiratory-gated treatments combinations. A percent dose difference between IC and TPS for the point dose and gamma indices for film–TPS planner dose comparison was used.
Results:
The dose profile of film and TPS for the static phantom matched well, and percent dose difference between IC and TPS was 0·4%. The percent dose difference for all the gated treatments were below 3·0% except 14-mm motion amplitude-gated treatment. The gamma passing rate was more than 95% for film–TPS comparison for all gated treatment for the investigated gamma acceptance criteria. For FB treatments, the percent dose difference for 6-, 10- and 14-mm motion amplitude was 1·4%, −2·7% and −4·1%, respectively. As the number of VR increased, the percent difference between measured and calculated values decreased. The gamma passing rate met the required tolerance for different acceptance criteria except for the 14-mm motion amplitude FB treatment.
Conclusion:
The PBS technique for the FB thoracic treatments up to 10-mm motion amplitude can be implemented with an acceptable accuracy using large proton beam spot size, AA and robust optimisation. The impact of the interplay effect can be reduced with VR and respiratory-gated treatment and extend the treatable tumour motion amplitude.
Collapse
|
18
|
Schneider T, Patriarca A, Degiovanni A, Gallas M, Prezado Y. Conceptual Design of a Novel Nozzle Combined with a Clinical Proton Linac for Magnetically Focussed Minibeams. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4657. [PMID: 34572884 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the tissue sparing potential of submillimetric, spatially fractionated beams (minibeams) with the improved ballistics of protons to enhance the tolerance of normal tissue and allow a dose escalation in the tumour. This approach could allow a more effective treatment of radioresistant tumours and has already shown excellent results for rat gliomas. To exploit the full potential of pMBRT, it should be delivered using magnetically focussed and scanned minibeams. However, such an implementation has not yet been demonstrated at clinically relevant beam energies. In this work, we therefore present a new design combining our recently developed minibeam nozzle with the first clinical proton linear accelerator. We show the suitability of this combination for the generation of magnetically focussed and scanned minibeams with clinically relevant parameters as well as for the delivery of conventional pencil beam scanning techniques. Abstract (1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach with the potential to significantly increase normal tissue sparing while providing tumour control equivalent or superior to standard proton therapy. For reasons of efficiency, flexibility and minibeam quality, the optimal implementation of pMBRT should use magnetically focussed minibeams which, however, could not yet be generated in a clinical environment. In this study, we evaluated our recently proposed minibeam nozzle together with a new clinical proton linac as a potential implementation. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine under which conditions minibeams can be generated and to evaluate the robustness against focussing magnet errors. Moreover, an example of conventional pencil beam scanning irradiation was simulated. (3) Results: Excellent minibeam sizes between 0.6 and 0.9 mm full width at half maximum could be obtained and a good tolerance to errors was observed. Furthermore, the delivery of a 10 cm × 10 cm field with pencil beams was demonstrated. (4) Conclusion: The combination of the new proton linac and minibeam nozzle could represent an optimal implementation of pMBRT by allowing the generation of magnetically focussed minibeams with clinically relevant parameters. It could furthermore be used for conventional pencil beam scanning.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sampayan SE, Sampayan KC, Caporaso GJ, Chen YJ, Falabella S, Hawkins SA, Hearn J, Watson JA, Zentler JM. Megavolt bremsstrahlung measurements from linear induction accelerators demonstrate possible use as a FLASH radiotherapy source to reduce acute toxicity. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17104. [PMID: 34429440 PMCID: PMC8385032 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95807-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies indicate better efficacy and healthy tissue sparing with high dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) cancer treatment. This technique delivers a prompt high radiation dose rather than fractional doses over time. While some suggest thresholds of > 40 Gy s−1 with a maximal effect at > 100 Gy s−1, accumulated evidence shows that instantaneous dose-rate and irradiation time are critical. Mechanisms are still debated, but toxicity is minimized while inducing apoptosis in malignant tissue. Delivery technologies to date show that a capability gap exists with clinic scale, broad area, deep penetrating, high dose rate systems. Based on these trends, if FLASH-RT is adopted, it may become a dominant approach except in the least technologically advanced countries. The linear induction accelerator (LIA) developed for high instantaneous and high average dose-rate, species independent charged particle acceleration, has yet to be considered for this application. We review the status of LIA technology, explore the physics of bremsstrahlung-converter-target interactions and our work on stabilizing the electron beam. While the gradient of the LIA is low, we present our preliminary work to improve the gradient by an order of magnitude, presenting a point design for a multibeam FLASH-RT system using a single accelerator for application to conformal FLASH-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E Sampayan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA. .,Opcondys, Inc., 600 Commerce Court, Manteca, CA, 95336, USA.
| | | | - George J Caporaso
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA
| | - Yu-Jiuan Chen
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA
| | - Steve Falabella
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA
| | - Steven A Hawkins
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA
| | - Jason Hearn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - James A Watson
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA
| | - Jan-Mark Zentler
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA, 94551, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Setianegara J, Mazur TR, Hao Y, Yang D, Harold Li H. Development of a storage phosphor imaging system for proton pencil beam spot profile determination. Med Phys 2021; 48:5459-5471. [PMID: 34318488 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate two-dimensional (2D) profile measurements at submillimeter precision are necessary for proton beam commissioning and periodic quality assurance (QA) purposes and are currently performed at our institution with a commercial scintillation detector (Lynx PT) with limited means for independent checks. The purpose of this work was to create an independent dosimetry system consisting of an in-house optical scanner and a BaFBrI:Eu2+ storage phosphor dosimeter by: (a) determining the optimal settings for the optical scanner, (b) measuring 2D proton spot profiles with the storage phosphors, and (c) comparing them to similar measurements using a commercial scintillation detector. METHODS An in-house 2D laboratory optical scanner was constructed and spatially calibrated for accurate 2D photostimulated luminescence (PSL) dosimetry. Square 5 × 5 cm2 BaFBrI:Eu2+ dosimeter samples were uniformly irradiated with line scans performed to determine the physical and electronic scanner settings resulting in the highest signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) at a sub-millimeter spatial resolution. The resultant spatial resolution of the scanner was then quantitatively assessed by measuring (a) line pairs on a standard X-ray lead bar phantom and (b) modulation transfer functions. Following this, 2D proton spot profiles from a Mevion S250i Hyperscan proton unit were obtained at 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 monitor unit (MU) settings at maximum energy (E0 = 227.1 MeV) and compared to baseline profiles from a commercial scintillation detector, where 1 MU is calibrated to deliver 1 Gy absolute proton dose-to-water under reference conditions, that is, 41 × 41 proton spots uniformly spaced by 0.25 cm within a 10 × 10 cm2 square field size at maximum energy (227.1 MeV) in water at depth of 5 cm at isocenter. The dosimetric system's sensitivities to (a) ±1 mm positional shifts and (b) ±0.3 mm beam lateral spread changes were quantitatively evaluated through a Gaussian fitting of the crossline and inline plots of the respective artificially shifted beam profiles. RESULTS The physical scanner settings of (a) Δτ = 27 ms time interval between data samples, (b) vx = 1.235 cm/s scanning speed, (c) 1% laser transmission (0.02 mW power) and (d) (Δx, Δy) = (0.33, 0.50 mm) pixel sizes with electronic settings of (a) 300 microseconds time constant, (b) normal dynamic reserve, (c) 24 dB/oct low pass filter slope, and (d) 160 Hz chopping frequency resulted in the highest SNR while maintaining sub-millimeter spatial resolution. The BaFBr0.85 I0.15 :Eu2+ storage phosphor dosimeters were linear from 1 to 50 MU and their profiles did not saturate up to 150 MU. The scanner was able to detect lateral displacements of ±1 mm in both the crossline and inline directions and ±0.3 mm beam spread changes that were artificially introduced by varying the incident proton energy. Specific to our proton unit, proton energy changes of ±1 MeV can also be detected indirectly via beam spread measurements. CONCLUSION Our combined dosimetric system including an in-house laboratory optical scanner and reusable BaFBr0.85 I0.15 :Eu2+ storage phosphors demonstrated a sufficient spatial resolution and dosimetric accuracy to support its use as an independent proton spot measurement dosimeter system. Its wide dynamic range allows for other versatile applications such as proton halo measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jufri Setianegara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Thomas R Mazur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Yao Hao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Deshan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - H Harold Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kang M, Wei S, Choi JI, Simone CB 2nd, Lin H. Quantitative Assessment of 3D Dose Rate for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiotherapy and Its Application for Lung Hypofractionation Treatment Planning. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3549. [PMID: 34298762 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
To quantitatively assess target and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose rate based on three proposed proton PBS dose rate metrics and study FLASH intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using transmission beams. An in-house FLASH planning platform was developed to optimize transmission (shoot-through) plans for nine consecutive lung cancer patients previously planned with proton SBRT. Dose and dose rate calculation codes were developed to quantify three types of dose rate calculation methods (dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), average dose rate (ADR), and dose-threshold dose rate (DTDR)) based on both phantom and patient treatment plans. Two different minimum MU/spot settings were used to optimize two different dose regimes, 34-Gy in one fraction and 45-Gy in three fractions. The OAR sparing and target coverage can be optimized with good uniformity (hotspot < 110% of prescription dose). ADR, accounting for the spot dwelling and scanning time, gives the lowest dose rate; DTDR, not considering this time but a dose-threshold, gives an intermediate dose rate, whereas DADR gives the highest dose rate without considering any time or dose-threshold. All three dose rates attenuate along the beam direction, and the highest dose rate regions often occur on the field edge for ADR and DTDR, whereas DADR has a better dose rate uniformity. The differences in dose rate metrics have led a large variation for OARs dose rate assessment, posing challenges to FLASH clinical implementation. This is the first attempt to study the impact of the dose rate models, and more investigations and evidence for the details of proton PBS FLASH parameters are needed to explore the correlation between FLASH efficacy and the dose rate metrics.
Collapse
|
22
|
Vidal M, Moignier C, Patriarca A, Sotiropoulos M, Schneider T, De Marzi L. Future technological developments in proton therapy - A predicted technological breakthrough. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:554-564. [PMID: 34272182 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the current spectrum of cancer treatments, despite high costs, a lack of robust evidence based on clinical outcomes or technical and radiobiological uncertainties, particle therapy and in particular proton therapy (PT) is rapidly growing. Despite proton therapy being more than fifty years old (first proposed by Wilson in 1946) and more than 220,000 patients having been treated with in 2020, many technological challenges remain and numerous new technical developments that must be integrated into existing systems. This article presents an overview of on-going technical developments and innovations that we felt were most important today, as well as those that have the potential to significantly shape the future of proton therapy. Indeed, efforts have been done continuously to improve the efficiency of a PT system, in terms of cost, technology and delivery technics, and a number of different developments pursued in the accelerator field will first be presented. Significant developments are also underway in terms of transport and spatial resolution achievable with pencil beam scanning, or conformation of the dose to the target: we will therefore discuss beam focusing and collimation issues which are important parameters for the development of these techniques, as well as proton arc therapy. State of the art and alternative approaches to adaptive PT and the future of adaptive PT will finally be reviewed. Through these overviews, we will finally see how advances in these different areas will allow the potential for robust dose shaping in proton therapy to be maximised, probably foreshadowing a future era of maturity for the PT technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Vidal
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Fédération Claude Lalanne, 227, avenue de la Lanterne, 06200 Nice, France
| | - C Moignier
- Centre François Baclesse, Department of Medical Physics, Centre de protonthérapie de Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
| | - A Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation oncology department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - M Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - T Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation oncology department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, 91898 Orsay, France; Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, Campus universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hyer DE, Bennett LC, Geoghegan TJ, Bues M, Smith BR. Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:73-83. [PMID: 34285937 PMCID: PMC8270095 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00039.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer–specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators. Materials and Methods The collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture. Results Collimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites. Conclusion The consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Laura C Bennett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bäumer C, Plaude S, Khalil DA, Geismar D, Kramer PH, Kröninger K, Nitsch C, Wulff J, Timmermann B. Clinical Implementation of Proton Therapy Using Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery Combined With Static Apertures. Front Oncol 2021; 11:599018. [PMID: 34055596 PMCID: PMC8149965 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.599018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy makes use of the favorable depth-dose distribution with its characteristic Bragg peak to spare normal tissue distal of the target volume. A steep dose gradient would be desired in lateral dimensions, too. The widespread spot scanning delivery technique is based, however, on pencil-beams with in-air spot full-widths-at-half-maximum of typically 1 cm or more. This hampers the sparing of organs-at-risk if small-scale structures adjacent to the target volume are concerned. The trimming of spot scanning fields with collimating apertures constitutes a simple measure to increase the transversal dose gradient. The current study describes the clinical implementation of brass apertures in conjunction with the pencil-beam scanning delivery mode at a horizontal, clinical treatment head based on commercial hardware and software components. Furthermore, clinical cases, which comprised craniopharyngiomas, re-irradiations and ocular tumors, were evaluated. The dosimetric benefits of 31 treatment plans using apertures were compared to the corresponding plans without aperture. Furthermore, an overview of the radiation protection aspects is given. Regarding the results, robust optimization considering range and setup uncertainties was combined with apertures. The treatment plan optimizations followed a single-field uniform dose or a restricted multi-field optimization approach. Robustness evaluation was expanded to account for possible deviations of the center of the pencil-beam delivery and the mechanical center of the aperture holder. Supplementary apertures improved the conformity index on average by 15.3%. The volume of the dose gradient surrounding the PTV (evaluated between 80 and 20% dose levels) was decreased on average by 17.6%. The mean dose of the hippocampi could be reduced on average by 2.9 GyRBE. In particular cases the apertures facilitated a sparing of an organ-at-risk, e.g. the eye lens or the brainstem. For six craniopharyngioma cases the inclusion of apertures led to a reduction of the mean dose of 1.5 GyRBE (13%) for the brain and 3.1 GyRBE (16%) for the hippocampi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Sandija Plaude
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dalia Ahmad Khalil
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Paul-Heinz Kramer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kevin Kröninger
- Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Felcini E, Bottura L, Gerbershagen A, van Nugteren J, Dutoit B. Particle tracking and beam optics analysis on a toroidal gantry for proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33849002 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
GaToroid is a concept of toroidal gantry for hadron therapy under investigation at CERN It makes use of the toroidal magnetic field between each pair of coils to steer and focus the particle beams down to the patient. This peculiar concept requires detailed studies on particle tracking and beam optics to optimise the winding geometry and explore the properties of the system. The work presented in this manuscript is focused on the features of a GaToroid system for protons, specifically designed to minimise the footprint and weight of the gantry. Firstly, a two-dimensional single particle tracking was developed to optimise the coil geometry and the toroidal magnetic field, aiming to the maximisation of the energy acceptance of the magnet. Particles over the whole spectrum of treatment energy are directed at isocenter within 1 mm of precision. This procedure, restricted to the symmetry plane between each pair of coils, defines different beam orbits, function of the beam energy. Subsequently, a three-dimensional particle tracking was implemented to evaluate the interaction of a beam of finite dimensions with the complete magnetic field map in vacuum. The parameters of the simulated beam at the isocenter are coherent with the clinical requirements. The results of the three-dimensional tracking were then used to calculate the linear transfer matrix associated to each beam orbit. Finally, the option of performing the beam spot scanning at the isocenter by acting on the upstream steering magnet has been investigated, highlighting the potential of the concept, as well as the limitations related to the scanning field dimension and source-to-axis distance. In conclusion, the results described in this paper represent a crucial step toward the understanding of the beam optics properties of a GaToroid gantry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Felcini
- TE Department-CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland.,Groupe SCI IC BD-EPFL, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - L Bottura
- TE Department-CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
| | | | | | - B Dutoit
- Groupe SCI IC BD-EPFL, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Grewal HS, Ahmad S, Jin H. Characterization of penumbra sharpening and scattering by adaptive aperture for a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system. Med Phys 2021; 48:1508-1519. [PMID: 33580550 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantitatively access penumbra sharpening and scattering by adaptive aperture (AA) under various beam conditions and clinical cases for a Mevion S250i compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system. METHODS First, in-air measurements were performed using a scintillation detector for single spot profile and lateral penumbra for five square field sizes (3 × 3 to 18 × 18 cm2 ), three energies (33.04, 147.36, and 227.16 MeV), and three snout positions (5, 15, and 33.6 cm) with Open and AA field. Second, treatment plans were generated in RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) for various combination of target size (3- and 10-cm cube), target depth (5, 10, and 15 cm) and air gap (5-20 cm) for both Open and AA field. These plans were delivered to EDR2 films in the solid water and penumbra reduction by AA was quantified. Third, the effect of the AA scattered protons on the surface dose was studied at 5 mm depth by EDR2 film and the RayStation TPS computation. Finally, dosimetric advantage of AA over Open field was studied for five brain and five prostate cases using the TPS simulation. RESULTS The spot size changed dramatically from 3.8 mm at proton beam energy of 227.15 MeV to 29.4 mm at energy 33.04 MeV. In-air measurements showed that AA substantially reduced the lateral penumbra by 30% to 60%. The EDR2 film measurements in solid water presented the maximum penumbra reduction of 10 to 14 mm depending on the target size. The maximum increase of 25% in field edge dose at 5 mm depth as compared to central axis was observed. The substantial penumbra reduction by AA produced less dose to critical structures for all the prostate and brain cases. CONCLUSIONS Adaptive aperture sharpens the penumbra by factor of two to three depending upon the beam condition. The absolute penumbra reduction with AA was more noticeable for shallower target, smaller target, and larger air gap. The AA-scattered protons contributed to increase in surface dose. Clinically, AA reduced the doses to critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardev S Grewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 NE 10th street SCC L100, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.,Oklahoma Proton Center, 5901 W Memorial Rd, Oklahoma City, OK, 73142, USA
| | - Salahuddin Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 NE 10th street SCC L100, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Hosang Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 NE 10th street SCC L100, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grewal HS, Ahmad S, Jin H. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites. Med Dosim 2020; 46:179-187. [PMID: 33279369 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
A compact pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy system, Mevion S250i with Hyperscan, is equipped with adaptive aperture (AA) to collimate the beam with 2 different techniques: Static aperture (SA) and dynamic aperture (DA). SA (single aperture) collimates the outermost contour of the target and DA (multi-layer aperture) collimates each energy layer of the proton beam. This study evaluates dosimetric performance of SA and DA for different disease sites. This study includes 5 disease sites (brain, head and neck (HN), partial breast, lung, and prostate), and 8 patients for each. A total of 80 patient treatment plans (5 sites × 8 patients per site × 2 collimation techniques) were created using 2 to 4 proton beams. Both SA and DA plans were made using the same plan and optimization parameters calculated by a Monte Carlo dose algorithm. Multi-field optimization (MFO) was used for HN treatment plans, whereas treatment plans for the other sites were made with single-field optimization (SFO). All plans were robustly optimized with 3 mm (brain and HN) or 5 mm (breast, lung, and prostate) position uncertainty along with 3.5% range uncertainty. Treatment plans were normalized such that 99% of the clinical target volume (CTV) received 100% of the prescribed dose. Dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were evaluated for CTV and organs at risk (OARs). The CTV was also evaluated for dose homogeneity, dose conformity, and dose gradient. In general, the DA plan made CTV hotter, while it saved OARs better. DA produced better conformity with sharper dose falloff around CTV, while SA generated better homogenous target coverage. DA decreased Dmax to brainstem (1.2% = [(SA-DA)/DA × 100%]) for brain, Dmax to the spinal cord (137.3%) for HN, D1% of the ipsilateral lung (50.5%) for breast, and Dmax to the spinal cord (74.0%) for lung. The dose reduction in bladder and rectum for prostate plans with DA was less than 2.5%. The DA plans reduced the dose to OARs for all disease sites but escalated the target maximum dose for the same target coverage than the SA plans. The OAR saving and dose escalation depended on CTV size, proximity of the OARs to CTV, and the plan complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hardev S Grewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA; Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73142, USA
| | - Salahuddin Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Hosang Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Farr JB, Moyers MF, Allgower CE, Bues M, Hsi WC, Jin H, Mihailidis DN, Lu HM, Newhauser WD, Sahoo N, Slopsema R, Yeung D, Zhu XR. Clinical commissioning of intensity-modulated proton therapy systems: Report of AAPM Task Group 185. Med Phys 2020; 48:e1-e30. [PMID: 33078858 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is an expanding radiotherapy modality in the United States and worldwide. With the number of proton therapy centers treating patients increasing, so does the need for consistent, high-quality clinical commissioning practices. Clinical commissioning encompasses the entire proton therapy system's multiple components, including the treatment delivery system, the patient positioning system, and the image-guided radiotherapy components. Also included in the commissioning process are the x-ray computed tomography scanner calibration for proton stopping power, the radiotherapy treatment planning system, and corresponding portions of the treatment management system. This commissioning report focuses exclusively on intensity-modulated scanning systems, presenting details of how to perform the commissioning of the proton therapy and ancillary systems, including the required proton beam measurements, treatment planning system dose modeling, and the equipment needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan B Farr
- Department of Medical Physics, Applications of Detectors and Accelerators to Medicine, Meyrin, 1217, Switzerland
| | | | - Chris E Allgower
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Wen-Chien Hsi
- University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Hosang Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| | - Dimitris N Mihailidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Hsiao-Ming Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hefei Ion Medical Center, 1700 Changning Avenue, Gaoxin District, Hefei, Anhui, 230088, China
| | - Wayne D Newhauser
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.,Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Daniel Yeung
- Saudi Proton Therapy Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, 11525, Saudi Arabia
| | - X Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zou W, Diffenderfer ES, Cengel KA, Kim MM, Avery S, Konzer J, Cai Y, Boisseu P, Ota K, Yin L, Wiersma R, Carlson DJ, Fan Y, Busch TM, Koumenis C, Lin A, Metz JM, Teo BK, Dong L. Current delivery limitations of proton PBS for FLASH. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:212-218. [PMID: 33186682 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) is an attractive solution to realize the advantageous normal tissue sparing elucidated from FLASH high dose rates. The mechanics of PBS spot delivery will impose limitations on the effective field dose rate for PBS. METHODS This study incorporates measurements from clinical and FLASH research beams on uniform single energy and the spread-out Bragg Peak PBS fields to extrapolate the PBS dose rate to high cyclotron beam currents 350, 500, and 800 nA. The impact of the effective field dose rate from cyclotron current, spot spacing, slew time and field size were studied. RESULTS When scanning magnet slew time and energy switching time are not considered, single energy effective field FLASH dose rate (≥40 Gy/s) can only be achieved with less than 4 × 4 cm2 fields when the cyclotron output current is above 500 nA. Slew time and energy switching time remain the limiting factors for achieving high effective dose rate of the field. The dose rate-time structures were obtained. The amount of the total dose delivered at the FLASH dose rate in single energy layer and volumetric field was also studied. CONCLUSION It is demonstrated that while it is difficult to achieve FLASH dose rate for a large field or in a volume, local FLASH delivery to certain percentage of the total dose is possible. With further understanding of the FLASH radiobiological mechanism, this study could provide guidance to adapt current clinical multi-field proton PBS delivery practice for FLASH proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Michele M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Steve Avery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Joshua Konzer
- IBA PT-Inc., PT Engineer-Beam Physics, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Yongliang Cai
- IBA PT-Inc., PT Engineer-Beam Physics, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Paul Boisseu
- Pyramid Technical Consultants, Systems Engineering, Boston, USA
| | - Kan Ota
- Pyramid Technical Consultants, Systems Engineering, Boston, USA
| | - Lingshu Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Rodney Wiersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - David J Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Yi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Theresa M Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Costas Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - BoonKeng K Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Forsthoefel MK, Ballew E, Unger KR, Ahn PH, Rudra S, Pang D, Collins SP, Dritschilo A, Harter W, Paudel N, Collins BT, Lischalk JW. Early Experience of the First Single-Room Gantry Mounted Active Scanning Proton Therapy System at an Integrated Cancer Center. Front Oncol 2020; 10:861. [PMID: 32547953 PMCID: PMC7273355 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Review the early experience with a single-room gantry mounted active scanning proton therapy system. Material and Methods: All patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved patient registry. Proton beam radiotherapy was delivered with a 250 MeV gantry mounted synchrocyclotron in a single-room integrated facility within the pre-existing cancer center. Demographic data, cancer diagnoses, treatment technique, and geographic patterns were obtained for all patients. Treatment plans were evaluated for mixed modality therapy. Insurance approval data was collected for all patients treated with PBT. Results: A total of 132 patients were treated with PBT between March 2018 and June 2019. The most common oncologic subsites treated included the central nervous system (22%), gastrointestinal tract (20%), and genitourinary tract (20%). The most common histologies treated included prostate adenocarcinoma (19%), non-small cell lung cancer (10%), primary CNS gliomas (8%), and esophageal cancer (8%). Rationale for PBT treatment included limitation of dose to adjacent critical organs at risk (67%), reirradiation (19%), and patient comorbidities (11%). Patients received at least one x-ray fraction delivered as prescribed (36%) or less commonly due to unplanned machine downtime (34%). Concurrent systemic therapy was administered to 57 patients (43%). Twenty-six patients (20%) were initially denied insurance coverage and required peer-to-peers (65%), written appeals (12%), secondary insurance approval (12%), and comparison x-ray to proton plans (8%) for subsequent approval. Proton beam radiotherapy approval required a median of 17 days from insurance submission. Discussion: Incorporation of PBT into our existing cancer center allowed for multidisciplinary oncologic treatment of a diverse population of patients. Insurance coverage for PBT presents as a significant hurdle and improvements are needed to provide more timely access to necessary oncologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Ballew
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Keith R Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Peter H Ahn
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sonali Rudra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dalong Pang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Anatoly Dritschilo
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - William Harter
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nitika Paudel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chang CW, Huang S, Harms J, Zhou J, Zhang R, Dhabaan A, Slopsema R, Kang M, Liu T, McDonald M, Langen K, Lin L. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems. Med Phys 2020; 47:1545-1557. [PMID: 31945191 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment planning systems (TPSs) from different vendors can involve different implementations of Monte Carlo dose calculation (MCDC) algorithms for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. There are currently no guidelines for validating non-water materials in TPSs. Furthermore, PBS-specific parameters can vary by 1-2 orders of magnitude among different treatment delivery systems (TDSs). This paper proposes a standardized framework on the use of commissioning data and steps to validate TDS-specific parameters and TPS-specific heterogeneity modeling to potentially reduce these uncertainties. METHODS A standardized commissioning framework was developed to commission the MCDC algorithms of RayStation 8A and Eclipse AcurosPT v13.7.20 using water and non-water materials. Measurements included Bragg peak depth-dose and lateral spot profiles and scanning field outputs for Varian ProBeam. The phase-space parameters were obtained from in-air measurements and the number of protons per MU from output measurements of 10 × 10 cm2 square fields at a 2 cm depth. Spot profiles and various PBS field measurements at additional depths were used to validate TPS. Human tissues in TPS, Gammex phantom materials, and artificial materials were used for the TPS benchmark and validation. RESULTS The maximum differences of phase parameters, spot sigma, and divergence between MCDC algorithms are below 4.5 µm and 0.26 mrad in air, respectively. Comparing TPS to measurements at depths, both MC algorithms predict the spot sigma within 0.5 mm uncertainty intervals, the resolution of the measurement device. Beam Configuration in AcurosPT is found to underestimate number of protons per MU by ~2.5% and requires user adjustment to match measured data, while RayStation is within 1% of measurements using Auto model. A solid water phantom was used to validate the range accuracy of non-water materials within 1% in AcurosPT. CONCLUSIONS The proposed standardized commissioning framework can detect potential issues during PBS TPS MCDC commissioning processes, and potentially can shorten commissioning time and improve dosimetric accuracies. Secondary MCDC can be used to identify the root sources of disagreement between primary MCDC and measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Sheng Huang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Anees Dhabaan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Roelf Slopsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, 10035, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Katja Langen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|