1
|
Mazurek R, Ishikawa K. ELISpot Assay for Gene Therapy in Large Animal Studies. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2573:323-332. [PMID: 36040606 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2707-5_25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Formation of neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune response with repeat adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy dosing are critical concerns in translational, large animal studies. The enzyme-linked immunospot/immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assay introduced a way to track B- and/or T-cell response to therapy over time at a protein level. We describe the protocol for this assay looking at relative interferon (IFN)-γ secretion in pre- and post-AAV injections in a pig model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Mazurek
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kiyotake Ishikawa
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ducret A, Ackaert C, Bessa J, Bunce C, Hickling T, Jawa V, Kroenke MA, Lamberth K, Manin A, Penny HL, Smith N, Terszowski G, Tourdot S, Spindeldreher S. Assay format diversity in pre-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment: Toward a possible harmonization of antigenicity assays. MAbs 2021; 14:1993522. [PMID: 34923896 PMCID: PMC8726688 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2021.1993522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A major impediment to successful use of therapeutic protein drugs is their ability to induce anti-drug antibodies (ADA) that can alter treatment efficacy and safety in a significant number of patients. To this aim, in silico, in vitro, and in vivo tools have been developed to assess sequence and other liabilities contributing to ADA development at different stages of the immune response. However, variability exists between similar assays developed by different investigators due to the complexity of assays, a degree of uncertainty about the underlying science, and their intended use. The impact of protocol variations on the outcome of the assays, i.e., on the immunogenicity risk assigned to a given drug candidate, cannot always be precisely assessed. Here, the Non-Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment working group of the European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) reviews currently used assays and protocols and discusses feasibility and next steps toward harmonization and standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Ducret
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chloé Ackaert
- ImmunXperts SA (A Nexelis Group Company), Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Juliana Bessa
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Timothy Hickling
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vibha Jawa
- Biotherapeutics and Bioanalysis Non-Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mark A Kroenke
- Clinical Immunology-Translational Medicine, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Kasper Lamberth
- Analysis & Characterisation, Global Research Technologies, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark
| | - Anaïs Manin
- Abzena, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hweixian L Penny
- Clinical Immunology-Translational Medicine, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Noel Smith
- Lonza Biologics, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden, UK
| | - Grzegorz Terszowski
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Therapeutic protein drugs have significantly improved the management of many severe and chronic diseases. However, their development and optimal clinical application are complicated by the induction of unwanted immune responses. Therapeutic protein-induced antidrug antibodies can alter drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics leading to impaired efficacy and occasionally serious safety issues. There has been a growing interest over the past decade in developing methods to assess the risk of unwanted immunogenicity during preclinical drug development, with the aim to mitigate the risk during the molecular design phase, clinical development and when products reach the market. Here, we discuss approaches to therapeutic protein immunogenicity risk assessment, with attention to assays and in vivo models used to mitigate this risk.
Collapse
|