Inhibition of methamphetamine sensitization by post-methamphetamine treatment with SCH 23390 or haloperidol

Epigenetic Effects Induced by Methamphetamine and Methamphetamine-Dependent Oxidative Stress

Methamphetamine is a widely abused drug, which possesses neurotoxic activity and powerful addictive effects. Understanding methamphetamine toxicity is key beyond the field of drug abuse since it allows getting an insight into the molecular mechanisms which operate in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. In fact, key alterations produced by methamphetamine involve dopamine neurotransmission in a way, which is reminiscent of spontaneous neurodegeneration and psychiatric schizophrenia. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms operated by methamphetamine represents a wide window to understand both the addicted brain and a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. This overlapping, which is already present when looking at the molecular and cellular events promoted immediately after methamphetamine intake, becomes impressive when plastic changes induced in the brain of methamphetamine-addicted patients are considered. Thus, the present manuscript is an attempt to encompass all the molecular events starting at the presynaptic dopamine terminals to reach the nucleus of postsynaptic neurons to explain how specific neurotransmitters and signaling cascades produce persistent genetic modifications, which shift neuronal phenotype and induce behavioral alterations. A special emphasis is posed on disclosing those early and delayed molecular events, which translate an altered neurotransmitter function into epigenetic events, which are derived from the translation of postsynaptic noncanonical signaling into altered gene regulation. All epigenetic effects are considered in light of their persistent changes induced in the postsynaptic neurons including sensitization and desensitization, priming, and shift of neuronal phenotype.

Importance of D1 and D2 receptor stimulation for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats

The behavioral manifestations of psychostimulant-induced sensitization vary markedly between young and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms mediating this phenomenon differ across ontogeny. In this project we examined the importance of D1 and D2 receptors for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period. In the behavioral experiments, rats were injected with reversible D1 and/or D2 antagonists (SCH23390 and/or raclopride) or an irreversible receptor antagonist (EEDQ) either before cocaine administration on the pretreatment day (induction) or before cocaine challenge on the test day (expression). In the EEDQ experiments, receptor specificity was assessed by using selective dopamine antagonists to protect D1 and/or D2 receptors from inactivation. Receptor binding assays showed that EEDQ caused substantial reductions in dorsal striatal D1 and D2 binding sites, while SCH23390 and raclopride fully protected D1 and D2 receptors from EEDQ-induced alkylation. Behavioral results showed that neither D1 nor D2 receptor stimulation was necessary for the induction of cocaine sensitization in preweanling rats. EEDQ disrupted the sensitization process, suggesting that another receptor type sensitive to EEDQ alkylation was necessary for the induction process. Expression of the sensitized response was prevented by an acute injection of a D1 receptor antagonist. The pattern of DA antagonist-induced effects described for preweanling rats is, with few exceptions, similar to what is observed when the same drugs are administered to adult rats. Thus, it appears that maturational changes in D1 and D2 receptor systems are not responsible for ontogenetic differences in the behavioral manifestation of cocaine sensitization.

Effects of D2 or combined D1/D2 receptor antagonism on the methamphetamine-induced one-trial and multi-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats

RATIONALE

There is suggestive evidence that the neural mechanisms mediating one-trial and multi-trial behavioral sensitization differ, especially when the effects of various classes of dopamine (DA) agonists are examined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of the D2 receptor for the induction of one-trial and multi-trial methamphetamine sensitization in preweanling rats.

METHODS

In a series of experiments, rats were injected with saline or raclopride (a selective D2 receptor antagonist), either alone or in combination with SCH23390 (a selective D1 receptor antagonist), 15 min prior to treatment with the indirect DA agonist methamphetamine. Acute control groups were given two injections of saline. This pretreatment regimen occurred on either postnatal days (PD) 13-16 (multi-trial) or PD 16 (one-trial). On PD 17, rats were challenged with methamphetamine and locomotor sensitization was determined.

RESULTS

Blockade of D2 or D1/D2 receptors reduced or prevented, respectively, the induction of multi-trial methamphetamine sensitization in young rats, while the same manipulations had minimal effects on one-trial behavioral sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

DA antagonist treatment differentially affected the methamphetamine-induced sensitized responding of preweanling rats depending on whether a one-trial or multi-trial procedure was used. The basis for this effect is uncertain, but there was some evidence that repeated DA antagonist treatment caused nonspecific changes that produced a weakened sensitized response. Importantly, DA antagonist treatment did not prevent the one-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats. The latter result brings into question whether DA receptor stimulation is necessary for the induction of psychostimulant-induced behavioral sensitization during early ontogeny.

Role of the D1 receptor for the dopamine agonist-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats

RATIONALE

The neural mechanisms mediating the ontogeny of behavioral sensitization are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of the D1 receptor for the induction of dopamine agonist-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period.

METHODS

In the first experiment, the early ontogeny of R-propylnorapomorphine (NPA)-induced behavioral sensitization was examined by pretreating male and female rats with saline or NPA (0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)) before placement in activity chambers on postnatal day (PD) 12, 16, 20, or 24. One day later, rats were tested with lower doses of NPA and the occurrence of locomotor sensitization was determined. In subsequent experiments, rats were injected with saline or the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.1, 0.5, 1, or 5 mg/kg, IP) 0, 15, 30, or 60 min before cocaine, methamphetamine (METH), or NPA pretreatment. The next day, rats were tested with the same dopamine agonist again and sensitized responding was assessed.

RESULTS

NPA produced one-trial behavioral sensitization at all ages tested. In preweanling rats, SCH23390, regardless of dose, was ineffective at preventing the induction of cocaine-, METH-, or NPA-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results are in partial contrast to adult rodent studies, in which SCH23390 blocks the induction of METH- and apomorphine-induced behavioral sensitization, but not cocaine sensitization. When these findings are considered together, it appears that D1 receptor stimulation is not necessary for the induction of behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period, although D1 receptors may play a more important role in adulthood.

Haloperidol treatment downregulates DCC expression in the ventral tegmental area

A core feature in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia is abnormal development and function of mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) circuitry. We have previously shown that variations in the function of the netrin-1 receptor, deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC), result in changes to the development, organization and ongoing plasticity of DA circuitry. In rodents, repeated exposure to the indirect DA-agonist, amphetamine upregulates DCC expression in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), but not in DA terminal regions. This elevation in DCC expression is associated with increased vulnerability to developing and maintaining sensitized mesolimbic DA function. Antipsychotic medications remain the best treatment option for managing the symptoms in schizophrenia. The peak effects of these medications are gradual, suggesting that a therapeutic component of antipsychotic treatment involves structural reorganization. Here we assessed whether repeated exposure to typical and atypical antipsychotics could also regulate DCC. Adult mice were orally administered haloperidol, clozapine, or risperidone via their drinking water for 4 weeks. Levels of DCC were measured by Western blot analysis of tissue punches of the VTA, medial prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, and dorsal striatum. Haloperidol decreased DCC levels by approximately 50% in the VTA, but not in DA targets. Furthermore, haloperidol did not alter UNC-5 homologue levels, another family of netrin-1 receptors, confirming that its effects target DCC-mediated netrin-1 signaling specifically. The atypical antipsychotics did not alter DCC expression. These results suggest that typical antipsychotics induce selective functional reorganization in the VTA via DCC-mediated netrin-1 signaling.

Pharmacologically-mediated reactivation and reconsolidation blockade of the psychostimulant-abuse circuit: a novel treatment strategy

Psychostimulant abuse continues to present legal, socioeconomic and medical challenges as a primary psychiatric disorder, and represents a significant comorbid factor in major psychiatric and medical illnesses. To date, monotherapeutic drug treatments have not proven effective in promoting long-term abstinence in psychostimulant abusers. In contrast to clinical trials utilizing monotherapies, combinations of dopamine (DA) agonists and selective 5-HT(3), 5HT(2A/2C), or NK(1) antagonists have shown robust efficacy in reversing behavioral and neurobiological alterations in animal models of psychostimulant abuse. One important temporal requirement for these treatments is that the 5-HT or NK(1) receptor antagonist be given at a critical time window after DA agonist administration. This requirement may reflect a necessary dosing regimen towards normalizing underlying dysfunctional neural circuits and "addiction memory" states. Indeed, chronic psychostimulant abuse can be conceptualized as a consolidated form of dysfunctional memory maintained by repeated drug- or cue-induced reactivation of neural circuit and subsequent reconsolidation. According to this concept, the DA agonist given first may reactivate this memory circuit, thereby rendering it transiently labile. The subsequent antagonist is hypothesized to disrupt reconsolidation necessary for restabilization, thus leading progressively to a therapeutically-mediated abolishment of dysfunctional synaptic plasticity. We propose that long-term abstinence in psychostimulant abusers may be achieved not only by targeting putative mechanistic pathways, but also by optimizing drug treatment regimens designed to disrupt the neural processes underlying the addicted state.

Unusual effects of nicotine as a psychostimulant on ambulatory activity in mice

The present study examined the effect of nicotine, alone and in combination with various drugs that act on the CNS, on ambulatory activity, a behavioral index for locomotion, in ICR (CD-1) strain mice. Nicotine at 0.25–2 mg/kg acutely reduced ambulatory activity of ICR mice. The effect of nicotine was similar to that of haloperidol and fluphenazine but distinct from that of bupropion and methylphenidate. ICR mice developed tolerance against the inhibitory effect of nicotine on ambulatory activity when nicotine was repeatedly administered. This effect was also distinct from bupropion and methylphenidate as they produced augmentation of their ambulation-stimulating effects in ICR mice. Nicotine reduced the ambulation-stimulating effects of bupropion and methylphenidate as well as haloperidol and fluphenazine. Taken together, nicotine exhibited unusual effects as a psychostimulant on ambulatory activity in ICR mice.

Restoration of amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization in dopamine D1 receptor-deficient mice

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Amphetamine-induced sensitization is thought to involve dopamine D(1) receptors. Using mice lacking dopamine D(1) receptors (D (1) (-/-) ), we found that they exhibited blunted sensitization to low doses of amphetamine, while others using different treatment and testing regimens reported inconsistent results. We investigated whether experimental variables, alteration in gene expression or cholinergic input played a role in amphetamine-induced responses.

METHODS

D (1) (-/-) and wild-type (D (1) (+/+) ) mice pretreated with amphetamine (1 mg/kg, 3-7 days) or various doses of nicotine (chronically but intermittently) were challenged with amphetamine (0.7 and/or 1 mg/kg) after short and long abstinence periods. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and phosphorylated c-AMP response element binding protein (p-CREB) genes were measured under basal conditions and after acute or repeated amphetamine treatments.

RESULTS

D (1) (-/-) mice failed to exhibit amphetamine-induced sensitization following short-term treatments and long abstinence periods, but expressed sensitization following prolonged amphetamine treatment or a shorter abstinence period. Basal expression of p-CREB (but not BDNF) was higher in D (1) (-/-) than D (1) (+/+) mice and was reduced after amphetamine treatment. Prolonged nicotine pretreatment augmented locomotor responses to amphetamine in both genotypes and restored sensitization in D (1) (-/-) mice.

CONCLUSIONS

D(1) receptors were necessary for induction, but may not be necessary for expression of amphetamine-induced sensitization at low doses. The manifestation of amphetamine sensitization depended on the duration of treatment and length of the withdrawal period. Cholinergic-nicotinic stimulation restored amphetamine-induced sensitization in D (1) (-/-) mice. Enhanced basal expression of p-CREB in D (1) (-/-) mice may represent an adaptive mechanism related to lack of D(1) receptors.

Intermittent Dopaminergic stimulation causes behavioral sensitization in the addicted brain and parkinsonism

The gold standard therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) consists in chronic administration of pulses of the dopamine (DA) precursor l-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA). Although the main brain area which is DA-deficient is the dorsal striatum (more the putamen than the caudate nucleus), other DA-innervated brain regions (i.e., the ventral striatum and other limbic areas) are affected by systemic administration of l-DOPA. While such a therapy produces an increase in synaptic and nonsynaptic DA, which replace the neurotransmitter deficiency, peaks of extracellular DA in the course of disease progression produce abnormal involuntary movements related to behavioral sensitization. Methamphetamine (METH), a widely abused drug, is known to produce behavioral sensitization, related to DA release (more in the ventral than dorsal striatum as well as other limbic regions). The present review discusses the overlapping between these treatments, based on pulses of DA stimulation with an emphasis on the class of DA receptors; signal transduction pathways; rearranged expression of neurotransmitters, cotransmitters, and their receptors coupled with ultrastructural changes. In fact, all these levels of synaptic plasticity show a surprising homology following these treatments, posing the mechanisms of behavioral sensitization during DA-replacement therapy in PD very close to the neurobiological mechanisms operating during METH abuse. In line with this view is the growing evidence of addictive behaviors in PD patients during the course of DA-replacement therapy.

Evidence for dopamine involvement in ambulation promoted by menthone in mice

The present study examines the mechanism that underlies the ability of menthone (MTN), a constituent of peppermint oil, to promote mouse ambulation. Since bupropion (BUP), a dopamine (DA) uptake inhibitor, promotes mouse ambulation, the effect of MTN combined with BUP on ambulation was investigated. The results showed that BUP with MTN produced an additive interaction on mouse ambulation. The effects of DA antagonists chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, SCH12679 and spiperone on the ability of MTN to promote ambulation were then examined. All of these antagonists attenuated the effects of MTN. Prior exposure to the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, which inhibits catecholamines synthesis, decreased subsequent sensitivity to the effect of MTN. These results suggest that DA is involved in the ability of MTN to promote ambulation in mice.

Psychosis pathways converge via D2high dopamine receptors

The objective of this review is to identify a target or biomarker of altered neurochemical sensitivity that is common to the many animal models of human psychoses associated with street drugs, brain injury, steroid use, birth injury, and gene alterations. Psychosis in humans can be caused by amphetamine, phencyclidine, steroids, ethanol, and brain lesions such as hippocampal, cortical, and entorhinal lesions. Strikingly, all of these drugs and lesions in rats lead to dopamine supersensitivity and increase the high-affinity states of dopamine D2 receptors, or D2High, by 200-400% in striata. Similar supersensitivity and D2High elevations occur in rats born by Caesarian section and in rats treated with corticosterone or antipsychotics such as reserpine, risperidone, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, and clozapine, with the latter two inducing elevated D2High states less than that caused by haloperidol or olanzapine. Mice born with gene knockouts of some possible schizophrenia susceptibility genes are dopamine supersensitive, and their striata reveal markedly elevated D2High states; suchgenes include dopamine-beta-hydroxylase, dopamine D4 receptors, G protein receptor kinase 6, tyrosine hydroxylase, catechol-O-methyltransferase, the trace amine-1 receptor, regulator of G protein signaling RGS9, and the RIIbeta form of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Striata from mice that are not dopamine supersensitive did not reveal elevated D2High states; these include mice with knockouts of adenosine A2A receptors, glycogen synthase kinase GSK3beta, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, dopamine D1 or D3 receptors, histamine H1, H2, or H3 receptors, and rats treated with ketanserin or aD1 antagonist. The evidence suggests that there are multiple pathways that convergetoelevate the D2High state in brain regions and that this elevation may elicit psychosis. This proposition is supported by the dopamine supersensitivity that is a common feature of schizophrenia and that also occurs in many types of genetically altered, drug-altered, and lesion-altered animals. Dopamine supersensitivity, in turn, correlates with D2High states. The finding that all antipsychotics, traditional and recent ones, act on D2High dopamine receptors further supports the proposition.

Repeated adenosine pre-treatment potentiates the acute effect of methamphetamine in rats

Adenosine was intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected to Wistar rats every 3 days with a total of 5 administrations. After a 7-day withdrawal, the animals were challenged with methamphetamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). The effect of methamphetamine on locomotor activity was significantly potentiated by repeated adenosine pretreatment. Moreover, methamphetamine-induced dopamine release was also increased in the striatum. Methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity and dopamine release were significantly potentiated by repeated pretreatment of an adenosine A1 agonist, N6-cyclohexyladenosine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). These results suggest that the acute effect of methamphetamine is potentiated by repeated pre-treatment of adenosine via adenosine A1 receptors.

Combined effects of diethylpropion and alcohol on locomotor activity of mice: participation of the dopaminergic and opioid systems

The widespread consumption of anorectics and combined anorectic + alcohol misuse are problems in Brazil. In order to better understand the interactive effects of ethanol (EtOH) and diethylpropion (DEP) we examined the locomotion-activating effects of these drugs given alone or in combination in mice. We also determined whether this response was affected by dopamine (DA) or opioid receptor antagonists. A total of 160 male Swiss mice weighing approximately 30 g were divided into groups of 8 animals per group. The animals were treated daily for 7 consecutive days with combined EtOH + DEP (1.2 g/kg and 5.0 mg/kg, ip), EtOH (1.2 g/kg, ip), DEP (5.0 mg/kg, ip) or the control solution coadministered with the DA antagonist haloperidol (HAL, 0.075 mg/kg, ip), the opioid antagonist naloxone (NAL, 1.0 mg/kg, ip), or vehicle. On days 1, 7 and 10 after the injections, mice were assessed in activity cages at different times (15, 30, 45 and 60 min) for 5 min. The acute combination of EtOH plus DEP induced a significantly higher increase in locomotor activity (day 1: 369.5 +/- 34.41) when compared to either drug alone (day 1: EtOH = 232.5 +/- 23.79 and DEP = 276.0 +/- 12.85) and to control solution (day 1: 153.12 +/- 7.64). However, the repeated administration of EtOH (day 7: 314.63 +/- 26.79 and day 10: 257.62 +/- 29.91) or DEP (day 7: 309.5 +/- 31.65 and day 10: 321.12 +/- 39. 24) alone or in combination (day 7: 459.75 +/- 41.28 and day 10: 427. 87 +/- 33.0) failed to induce a progressive increase in the locomotor response. These data demonstrate greater locomotion-activating effects of the EtOH + DEP combination, probably involving DA and/or opioid receptor stimulation, since the daily pretreatment with HAL (day 1: EtOH + DEP = 395.62 +/- 11.92 and EtOH + DEP + HAL = 371.5 +/- 6.76; day 7: EtOH + DEP = 502.5 +/- 42.27 and EtOH + DEP + HAL = 281.12 +/- 16.08; day 10: EtOH + DEP = 445.75 +/- 16.64 and EtOH + DEP + HAL = 376.75 +/- 16.4) and NAL (day 1: EtOH + DEP = 553.62 +/- 38.15 and EtOH + DEP + NAL = 445.12 +/- 55.67; day 7: EtOH + DEP = 617.5 +/- 38.89 and EtOH + DEP + NAL = 418.25 +/- 61.18; day 10: EtOH + DEP = 541.37 +/- 32.86 and EtOH + DEP + NAL = 427.12 +/- 51.6) reduced the locomotor response induced by combined administration of EtOH + DEP. These findings also suggest that a major determinant of combined anorectic-alcohol misuse may be the increased stimulating effects produced by the combination.

Psychotomimetic-induction of tissue plasminogen activator mRNA in corticostriatal neurons in rat brain

We have studied in the rat the effects of acute subcutaneous injection of psychotomimetics including methamphetamine (MAP), cocaine and phencyclidine (PCP) on the expression of a brain plasticity-related molecule, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) mRNA, using non-radioactive in situ hybridization histochemistry. In addition to the constitutive expression of tPA mRNA in cerebellar Purkinje cells, ventricular ependymal cells and meningeal blood vessel-associated cells, MAP (1-4 mg/kg), cocaine (30 mg/kg) and PCP (1.25-5 mg/kg) caused a transient and dose-dependent induction of the transcript with its peak at 3 h postinjection in a group of neurons of the medial and insular prefrontal cortices, and the piriform cortex. Another indirect dopamine agonist nomifensine (20-40 mg/kg) mimicked the tPA mRNA induction in the prefrontal cortical areas. Moreover, MAP induction of tPA mRNA was markedly inhibited by pretreatment with a D1 (R(+)-SCH23390: R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetra-hydro-1H-3-be nza zepine hydrochloride) or a D2 (haloperidol) dopamine receptor-preferring antagonist. Intramedial striatum, but not intrathalamic, application of a fluorescent tracer, fluorogold, retrogradely labelled the cortical cells expressing tPA mRNA. The present results suggest that acute injections of the above psychotomimetic drugs may induce tPA mRNA in a group of the prefrontal cortical neurons that project to the medial striatum. This tPA mRNA expression may be due to the activation of the dopamine neurotransmission. Because it is well documented that single or repeated administration of methamphetamine, cocaine and PCP produces enduring changes in responses to these drugs in humans and experimental animals (e.g. behavioural sensitization), the psychotomimetic-induction of tPA mRNA could be implicated in an initial step in the plastic rearrangements in the neuronal circuits underlying long-lasting changes in behavioural expression.

Chemical restraint for the agitated patient in the emergency department: lorazepam versus droperidol

Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute agitation frequently require physical and chemical restraint. To determine the efficacy of lorazepam vs. droperidol, we conducted a prospective, randomized study of violently agitated patients requiring chemical restraint. Patients were randomized to receive either lorazepam or droperidol i.v. A six-point sedation scale was used. Sedation scores were recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min. Vital signs were compared at time 0 and at 60 min. Repeat dosages of each drug could be given at 30 min. Toxicology screen, ethanol and creatinine phosphokinase levels were obtained. A total of 202 patients were evaluated. One hundred patients received lorazepam and 102 patients received droperidol. Agitation was attributed to methamphetamine toxicity in 146 patients (72%), cocaine toxicity in 28 (14%), psychiatric illness in 20 (10%), and ethanol withdrawal in 8 (4%). Ethanol intoxication was present in 98 patients (49%). Both drugs had similar sedation profiles at 5 min. Patients receiving droperidol had significantly lower sedation scores at times 10, 15, 30, and 60 than lorazepam. More repeat doses of lorazepam were given (40) than droperidol (8) at 30 min. We conclude that droperidol produces a more rapid and better sedation than lorazepam at the doses used in this study in agitated patients requiring chemical restraint. Lorazepam is more likely to require repeat dosing than droperidol. Methamphetamine toxicity was present in the majority of patients in this study.

Behavioral and neurochemical recovery from partial 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the substantia nigra is blocked by daily treatment with D1/D5, but not D2, dopamine receptor antagonists

To determine whether D1/D5 dopamine (DA) receptors play a role in normalization of DA extracellular levels of striatal DA and behavioral recovery after partial 6-OHDA lesions of the substantia nigra, animals were treated on days 1-8 after lesioning with the D1/D5 DA receptor antagonists SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) and SCH 39166 (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.), the inactive enantiomer SCH 23388 (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), the D2 antagonist eticlopride (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), or saline. Spontaneous turning behavior was assessed on days 3 and 15. Basal extracellular DA and metabolites were measured in both striata using microdialysis on days 16 and 17, 8-9 d after termination of drug treatments. On day 3, all animals turned ipsilateral to the lesion. On day 15, animals previously treated with either saline, eticlopride, or SCH 23388 showed no behavioral asymmetries, whereas animals treated with SCH 23390 or SCH 39166 turned ipsilaterally. On days 16 and 17, extracellular DA did not differ on the two sides in animals treated with saline or eticlopride and were higher on the lesioned side after SCH 23388. In animals treated with the D1/D5 receptor antagonists, however, basal levels of DA were lower on the lesioned side, showing no evidence of normalization. These results suggest a role for the D1/D5 DA receptor in the development of compensatory changes in the DA neurons that accompany behavioral recovery from partial lesions of nigrostriatal DA system.

Effects of postmethamphetamine treatment with restraint on ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine in mice

The administration of methamphetamine (2 mg/kg SC) to mice was followed by acceleration of ambulation (locomotion) for 3 h, with the peak effect at 1/2-1 h. When mice were allowed free ambulation for 3 h in an activity cage of 20 cm in diameter after methamphetamine administration, repeated administrations of methamphetamine, four times at 3-day intervals, caused ambulatory sensitization; the count at the fourth administration being approximately 2.3 times as high as that at the first administration. Furthermore, the mice that were allowed ambulation in the activity cage during postmethamphetamine period of either 0-1/2, 0-1, 0-2, or 1/2-1 h (during the other periods, the mice were put in jars of 6 cm in diameter to restrict ambulation) demonstrated ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine, and these levels were as same as that in the mice given methamphetamine with free ambulation for 3 h. However, the free ambulation during postmethamphetamine periods of 0-1/4 h and 1-3 h failed to produce strong sensitization to methamphetamine. These results suggest that a free ambulation for at least 1/2 h during the postmethamphetamine period of 0-1 h is important for induction of ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine in mice.

Contrasting effects on methamphetamine sensitization of ceruletide, a cholecystokinin-like decapeptide, and haloperidol

Ceruletide, a cholecystokinin-like decapeptide, and haloperidol show neuroleptic actions through inhibition of dopamine release and blockade of dopamine receptors, respectively. In this study, the effects of both drugs on methamphetamine sensitization were assessed by means of ambulation in mice. The enhancement in ambulation increase caused by five repeated administrations of methamphetamine (2 mg/kg, SC) at 3- to 4-day intervals was dose-dependently reduced when it was administered simultaneously with ceruletide (0.01-0.1 mg/kg, SC) or haloperidol (0.03-0.3 mg/kg, SC). However, only haloperidol could inhibit the induction of methamphetamine sensitization as assessed by challenge with methamphetamine alone. Post-treatment with ceruletide (0.03 mg/kg) 3 h after each methamphetamine accelerated, whereas such post-treatment with ceruletide (0.1 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) delayed, the induction of methamphetamine sensitization. On the other hand, mice given five pretreatments with ceruletide (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) at 3- to 4-day intervals did not exhibit any significant change in the sensitivity to methamphetamine. The present results suggest that, in contrast to the dose-dependent inhibition of methamphetamine sensitization in the simultaneous administration and post-treatment schedules, although both drugs can antagonize the acute stimulant effect of methamphetamine.