1
|
Grävare Silbernagel K, Malliaras P, de Vos RJ, Hanlon S, Molenaar M, Alfredson H, van den Akker-Scheek I, Antflick J, van Ark M, Färnqvist K, Haleem Z, Kaux JF, Kirwan P, Kumar B, Lewis T, Mallows A, Masci L, Morrissey D, Murphy M, Newsham-West R, Norris R, O'Neill S, Peers K, Sancho I, Seymore K, Vallance P, van der Vlist A, Vicenzino B. ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy. Sports Med 2022; 52:613-641. [PMID: 34797533 PMCID: PMC8891092 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series. RESULTS 9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. CONCLUSION 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42020156763.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Grävare Silbernagel
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
| | - Peter Malliaras
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert-Jan de Vos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Shawn Hanlon
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Mitchel Molenaar
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Håkan Alfredson
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jarrod Antflick
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Mathijs van Ark
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Care Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences and Peescentrum, Centre of Expertise Primary Care Groningen (ECEZG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Zubair Haleem
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Arsenal Football Club, London, UK
| | - Jean-Francois Kaux
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Sports Traumatology, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Paul Kirwan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bhavesh Kumar
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Trevor Lewis
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Adrian Mallows
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Lorenzo Masci
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Myles Murphy
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Richard Newsham-West
- School of Allied Health, Department of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Norris
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Seth O'Neill
- School of Allied Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Koen Peers
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Igor Sancho
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, University of Deusto, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Kayla Seymore
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Patrick Vallance
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Arco van der Vlist
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bill Vicenzino
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Affiliation(s)
- Max Flemming Ravn Merkel
- Institute of Sports Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Bispebjerg‐Frederiksberg University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Ylva Hellsten
- Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Stig Peter Magnusson
- Institute of Sports Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Bispebjerg‐Frederiksberg University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Center for Healthy Aging Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Michael Kjaer
- Institute of Sports Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Bispebjerg‐Frederiksberg University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Center for Healthy Aging Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Background Achilles tendinopathy describes the clinical presentation of pain localised to the Achilles tendon and associated loss of function with tendon loading activities. However, clinicians display differing approaches to the diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy due to inconsistency in the clinical terminology, an evolving understanding of the pathophysiology, and the lack of consensus on clinical tests which could be considered the gold standard for diagnosing Achilles tendinopathy. The primary aim of this scoping review is to provide a method for clinically diagnosing Achilles tendinopathy that aligns with the nine core health domains. Methodology A scoping review was conducted to synthesise available evidence on the clinical diagnosis and clinical outcome measures of Achilles tendinopathy. Extracted data included author, year of publication, participant characteristics, methods for diagnosing Achilles tendinopathy and outcome measures. Results A total of 159 articles were included in this scoping review. The most commonly used subjective measure was self-reported location of pain, while additional measures included pain with tendon loading activity, duration of symptoms and tendon stiffness. The most commonly identified objective clinical test for Achilles tendinopathy was tendon palpation (including pain on palpation, localised tendon thickening or localised swelling). Further objective tests used to assess Achilles tendinopathy included tendon pain during loading activities (single-leg heel raises and hopping) and the Royal London Hospital Test and the Painful Arc Sign. The VISA-A questionnaire as the most commonly used outcome measure to monitor Achilles tendinopathy. However, psychological factors (PES, TKS and PCS) and overall quality of life (SF-12, SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L) were less frequently measured. Conclusions There is significant variation in the methodology and outcome measures used to diagnose Achilles tendinopathy. A method for diagnosing Achilles tendinopathy is proposed, that includes both results from the scoping review and recent recommendations for reporting results in tendinopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley Matthews
- Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard Ellis
- Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - James Furness
- Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wayne A Hing
- Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vo TP, Ho GWK, Andrea J. Achilles Tendinopathy, A Brief Review and Update of Current Literature. Curr Sports Med Rep 2021; 20:453-461. [PMID: 34524189 DOI: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chronic pain in the Achilles tendon is a common problem in both athletes and nonathletes alike. The etiology for the development of Achilles tendinopathy has not been fully elucidated, and there remains multiple theories to explain the pain and dysfunction accompanying this condition. The diagnosis of Achilles tendon problems continues to rely on the clinical history and physical examination. The optimal management of pain, restoration of function, and return-to-sports participation with Achilles tendinopathy are evolving because of the advancement in technologies and research regarding its pathophysiology. This article aims to provide a brief review of the relevant anatomy, differential diagnosis, imaging findings, and an update of the literature on conservative and minimally invasive managements of chronic Achilles tendinopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy Phuong Vo
- Prince William Family Medicine, an Inova Partner, Manassas, VA
| | | | - John Andrea
- Inova Fairfax Family Medicine Program, Fairfax, VA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Alcala-Galiano A, Allen G, Aparisi Gómez MP, Aringhieri G, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gitto S, Grainger AJ, Greenwood S, Gupta H, Isaac A, Ivanoski S, Khanna M, Klauser A, Mansour R, Martin S, Mascarenhas V, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McKean D, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Mirón Mombiela R, Moutinho R, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Prada González R, Prakash M, Posadzy M, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Ž, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Tomas X, Vasilevska Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Obradov M. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part VI, foot and ankle. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:1384-1394. [PMID: 34432122 PMCID: PMC8794903 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08125-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Clarity regarding accuracy and effectiveness for interventional procedures around the foot and ankle is lacking. Consequently, a board of 53 members of the Ultrasound and Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) reviewed the published literature to evaluate the evidence on image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around this anatomical region. Methods We report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered around foot and ankle in order to derive their clinical indications. Experts drafted a list of statements and graded them according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus was considered strong when > 95% of experts agreed with the statement or broad when > 80% but < 95% agreed. The results of the Delphi-based consensus were used to write the paper that was shared with all panel members for final approval. Results A list of 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications for image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle were drafted after a literature review. The highest level of evidence was reported for four statements, all receiving 100% agreement. Conclusion According to this consensus, image-guided interventions should not be considered a first-level approach for treating Achilles tendinopathy, while ultrasonography guidance is strongly recommended to improve the efficacy of interventional procedures for plantar fasciitis and Morton’s neuroma, particularly using platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroids, respectively. Key Points • The expert panel of the ESSR listed 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle. • Strong consensus was obtained for all statements. • The highest level of evidence was reached by four statements concerning the effectiveness of US-guided injections of corticosteroid for Morton’s neuroma and PRP for plantar fasciitis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08125-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. .,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, Brunssum, Kerkrade, the Netherlands
| | - Domenico Albano
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.,Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Georgina Allen
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK.,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Hospital Vithas Nueve de Octubre, Valencia, Spain
| | - Giacomo Aringhieri
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Vito Chianca
- Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Napoli, Italy.,Clinica di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Angelo Corazza
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | - Danoob Dalili
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Francesco Di Pietto
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Haidari, Athens, Greece
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Isaac
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Slavcho Ivanoski
- Department of Radiology, Special Hospital for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, St. Erazmo -, Ohrid, North Macedonia.,Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | | | - Andrea Klauser
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ramy Mansour
- Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vasco Mascarenhas
- Hospital da Luz, Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Lisbon, Portugal.,AIRC, Advanced Imaging Research Consortium, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - David McKean
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | | | - Kalliopi Melaki
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmelo Messina
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ricardo Moutinho
- Hospital da Luz, Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Lisbon, Portugal.,Hospital de Loulé, Loulé, Portugal
| | - Cyprian Olchowy
- Department of Oral Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Davide Orlandi
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Mahesh Prakash
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Saulius Rutkauskas
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Žiga Snoj
- Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Tomas
- Radiology Dpt. MSK Unit. Hospital Clinic (CDIC), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jelena Vucetic
- Radiology Department, Hospital ICOT Ciudad de Telde, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | | | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Varelli Institute, Naples, Italy
| | - Marina Obradov
- Department of Radiology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hirschmüller A, Morath O. [Tendinopathies of the Achilles tendon]. Z Rheumatol 2021; 80:629-640. [PMID: 34287670 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-021-01006-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Disorders of the Achilles tendon are among the most frequent musculoskeletal injuries in athletes as well as in the general population. It is very important to differentiate the different clinical pictures summarized under the general term achillodynia and to understand the pathogenesis in order to undertake the correct therapeutic measures. In the case of insertional tendinopathies in particular, a rheumatological origin should be clarified. Doppler ultrasound is the most important diagnostic tool. Evidence-based treatment methods include various training programs, shock wave treatment, diverse injection and surgical procedures, each of which are discussed in detail in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Hirschmüller
- Altius Swiss Sportmed Center Ag, Habich-Dietschy-Str. 5a, 4310, Rheinfelden, Schweiz. .,Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
| | - Oliver Morath
- Institut Bewegungs- und Arbeitsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van der Vlist AC, Winters M, Weir A, Ardern CL, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Verhaar JAN, de Vos RJ. Which treatment is most effective for patients with Achilles tendinopathy? A living systematic review with network meta-analysis of 29 randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55:249-256. [PMID: 32522732 PMCID: PMC7907558 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a consistently updated overview of the comparative effectiveness of treatments for Achilles tendinopathy. DESIGN Living systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Multiple databases including grey literature sources were searched up to February 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials examining the effectiveness of any treatment in patients with both insertional and/or midportion Achilles tendinopathy. We excluded trials with 10 or fewer participants per treatment arm or trials investigating tendon ruptures. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to appraise the certainty of evidence. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE The validated patient-reported Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire. RESULTS 29 trials investigating 42 different treatments were included. 22 trials (76%) were at high risk of bias and 7 (24%) had some concerns. Most trials included patients with midportion tendinopathy (86%). Any treatment class seemed superior to wait-and-see for midportion Achilles tendinopathy at 3 months (very low to low certainty of evidence). At 12 months, exercise therapy, exercise+injection therapy and exercise+night splint therapy were all comparable with injection therapy for midportion tendinopathy (very low to low certainty). No network meta-analysis could be performed for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION In our living network meta-analysis no trials were at low risk of bias and there was large uncertainty in the comparative estimates. For midportion Achilles tendinopathy, wait-and-see is not recommended as all active treatments seemed superior at 3-month follow-up. There seems to be no clinically relevant difference in effectiveness between different active treatments at either 3-month or 12-month follow-up. As exercise therapy is easy to prescribe, can be of low cost and has few harms, clinicians could consider starting treatment with a calf-muscle exercise programme. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018086467.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arco C van der Vlist
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus Winters
- Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Adam Weir
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Aspetar Sports Groin Pain Centre, Aspetar Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Ad Dawhah, Qatar
| | - Clare L Ardern
- Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
| | - Nicky J Welton
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Deborah M Caldwell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jan A N Verhaar
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan de Vos
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Darrieutort-Laffite C, Soslowsky LJ, Le Goff B. Molecular and Structural Effects of Percutaneous Interventions in Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21197000. [PMID: 32977533 PMCID: PMC7582801 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is a common problem, especially in people of working age, as well as in the elderly. Although the pathogenesis of tendinopathy is better known, therapeutic management of AT remains challenging. Various percutaneous treatments have been applied to tendon lesions: e.g., injectable treatments, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), corticosteroids, stem cells, MMP inhibitors, and anti-angiogenic agents), as well as percutaneous procedures without any injection (percutaneous soft tissue release and dry needling). In this review, we will describe and comment on data about the molecular and structural effects of these treatments obtained in vitro and in vivo and report their efficacy in clinical trials. Local treatments have some impact on neovascularization, inflammation or tissue remodeling in animal models, but evidence from clinical trials remains too weak to establish an accurate management plan, and further studies will be necessary to evaluate their value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Darrieutort-Laffite
- Rheumatology Department, Nantes University Hospital, 44000 Nantes, France;
- INSERM UMR1238, Bone Sarcoma and Remodeling of Calcified Tissue, Nantes University, 44000 Nantes, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2-40-08-48-01
| | - Louis J. Soslowsky
- McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19401-6081, USA;
| | - Benoit Le Goff
- Rheumatology Department, Nantes University Hospital, 44000 Nantes, France;
- INSERM UMR1238, Bone Sarcoma and Remodeling of Calcified Tissue, Nantes University, 44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Solomons L, Lee JJY, Bruce M, White LD, Scott A. Intramuscular stimulation vs sham needling for the treatment of chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238579. [PMID: 32898170 PMCID: PMC7478532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The insertion of filiform needles intramuscularly (a.k.a. intramuscular stimulation/dry needling) has been suggested as a possible treatment for various painful musculoskeletal conditions. Our aim was to answer the question, is intramuscular stimulation more effective than sham intramuscular stimulation/dry needling for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy? Methods 52 participants with persistent midportion Achilles tendinopathy began and 46 completed one of three treatment protocols which were randomly assigned: (G3) a 12-week rehabilitation program of progressive tendon loading plus intramuscular stimulation (n = 25), (G2) the same rehabilitation program but with sham intramuscular stimulation (n = 19), or (G1) a reference group of rehabilitation program alone (as an additional control) (n = 8). The a priori primary outcome measure was change in VISA-A score at 12 weeks–VISA-A was also measured at 6 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures include the proportion of patients who rated themselves as much or very much improved (%), dorsiflexion range of motion (degrees), and tendon thickness (mm). Results The study retention was 94% at 12 weeks and 88% at 1 year. VISA-A score improved in all three groups over time (p<0.0001), with no significant difference among the three groups in VISA-A score at the start of the study (mean ± SD: G3 59 ± 13, G2 57 ± 17, G1 56 ± 22), at 12 weeks (G3 76 ± 14, G2 76 ± 15, G1 82 ± 11) or at any other timepoint. The percentage of patients who rated themselves as much or very much improved (i.e. treatment success) was not different after 12 weeks (G3 70%, G2 89%, G1 86% p = 0.94), or at 26 (p = 0.62) or 52 weeks (p = 0.71). No clinically significant effects of intervention group were observed in any of the secondary outcome measures. Conclusion The addition of intramuscular stimulation to standard rehabilitation for Achilles tendinopathy did not result in any improvement over the expected clinical benefit achieved with exercise-based rehabilitation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndal Solomons
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jenny J. Y. Lee
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Lynita D. White
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Tall Tree Physiotherapy & Health Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alex Scott
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zardi EM, Pipita ME, Giorgi C, Afeltra A, Maffulli N, Franceschi F. Strain Ultrasound Elastography in the Achilles Tendon of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Treated With Anti-TNF-α: A Preliminary Study. In Vivo 2020; 33:1635-1640. [PMID: 31471416 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM To compare patients affected by ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with anti-TNF-α for two years with controls in terms of Achilles tendon stiffness, ultrasound structure and thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS B-mode ultrasound evaluation and strain ultrasound elastography were performed in longitudinal and transverse planes on 22 Achilles tendons of 11 AS patients and 26 of 13 controls. RESULTS There were no significant differences in thickness and stiffness of the Achilles tendon between AS patients and controls, except for an increased thickness in the middle third of the tendon in the AS patients (p=0.04). The Achilles tendon stiffness ratio of AS patients was 1.02±0.36 vs. 1.14±0.38 in the controls (p=0.2). CONCLUSION AS patients had an Achilles tendon thickness greater than controls at the middle third, but no difference in the stiffness was found among them. Strain ultrasound elastography may be useful to exclude early changes in mechanical properties of tendons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico M Zardi
- Internistic Ultrasound Service "Campus Bio-Medico" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Pipita
- Internistic Ultrasound Service "Campus Bio-Medico" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Giorgi
- Radiology Department, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Urbino, Italy
| | | | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.,Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.,School of Medicine, Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, Guy Hilton, Keele University, Newcastle, U.K
| | - Francesco Franceschi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaplan K, Olivencia O, Dreger M, Hanney WJ, Kolber MJ. Achilles Tendinopathy: An Evidence-Based Overview for the Sports Medicine Professional. Strength Cond J 2019. [DOI: 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
Conservative Therapy of Achilles Tendinopathy in Sports Medicine Abstract. Due to its key role in power transmission, the Achilles tendon is a common site of acute and overuse injuries in running athletes. Therefore, a sports physician needs to know some anatomic, diagnostic and therapeutic key points to be able to establish an individualized therapy approach. With regard to the «in» and «out of season» period, there is a primary focus on physio- and shock-wave therapy. Additionally, peritendinous infiltration might be re-evaluated in individual cases. In this review we focus on «midportion» and «insertional» tendinopathy. Nevertheless, conservative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures will be discussed as well. This concise overview should provide the sports physician with basic knowledge of these common pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anja Hirschmüller
- ALTIUS Swiss Sportmed Center AG, Rheinfelden
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The absence of a single, identifiable traumatic cause has been traditionally used as a definition for a causative factor of overuse injury. Excessive loading, insufficient recovery, and underpreparedness can increase injury risk by exposing athletes to relatively large changes in load. The musculoskeletal system, if subjected to excessive stress, can suffer from various types of overuse injuries which may affect the bone, muscles, tendons, and ligaments. METHODS We performed a search (up to March 2018) in the PubMed and Scopus electronic databases to identify the available scientific articles about the pathophysiology and the incidence of overuse sport injuries. For the purposes of our review, we used several combinations of the following keywords: overuse, injury, tendon, tendinopathy, stress fracture, stress reaction, and juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. RESULTS Overuse tendinopathy induces in the tendon pain and swelling with associated decreased tolerance to exercise and various types of tendon degeneration. Poor training technique and a variety of risk factors may predispose athletes to stress reactions that may be interpreted as possible precursors of stress fractures. A frequent cause of pain in adolescents is juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD), which is characterized by delamination and localized necrosis of the subchondral bone, with or without the involvement of articular cartilage. The purpose of this compressive review is to give an overview of overuse injuries in sport by describing the theoretical foundations of these conditions that may predispose to the development of tendinopathy, stress fractures, stress reactions, and juvenile osteochondritis dissecans and the implication that these pathologies may have in their management. CONCLUSIONS Further research is required to improve our knowledge on tendon and bone healing, enabling specific treatment strategies to be developed for the management of overuse injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Aicale
- Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - D. Tarantino
- Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - N. Maffulli
- Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, 275 Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG England
| |
Collapse
|