1
|
Sabatini FM, Cohen-Rosenblum A, Eason TB, Hannon CP, Mounce SD, Krueger CA, Gwathmey FW, Duncan ST, Landy DC. Incidence of Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis Following Intra-articular Hip Corticosteroid Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arthroplast Today 2023; 24:101242. [PMID: 37941925 PMCID: PMC10630590 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommends intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) for managing hip osteoarthritis (OA) based on short-term, prospective studies. Recent retrospective studies have raised concerns that CSIs may lead to rapidly progressive OA (RPOA). We sought to systematically review the literature of CSIs for hip OA to estimate the incidence of RPOA. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify original research of hip OA patients receiving CSIs. Overall, 27 articles involving 5831 patients published from 1988 to 2022 were included. Study design, patient characteristics, CSI details, follow-up, and cases of RPOA were recorded. Studies were classified by their ability to detect RPOA based on follow-up. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the incidence of RPOA for studies able to detect RPOA. Results The meta-analytic estimate of RPOA incidence was 6% (95% confidence interval, 3%-9%) based on 10 articles classified as able to detect RPOA. RPOA definitions varied from progression of OA within 6 months to the presence of destructive changes. These studies were subject to bias from excluding patients with missing post-CSI radiographs. The remaining 17 articles were classified as unable to detect RPOA, including all of the studies cited in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommendation. Conclusions The incidence of RPOA after CSIs remains unknown due to variation in definitions and follow-up. While RPOA following CSIs may be 6%, many cases are not severe, and this may reflect selection bias. Further research is needed to understand whether clinically significant RPOA is incident enough to limit CSI use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco M. Sabatini
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | | | - Travis B. Eason
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Charles P. Hannon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Samuel D. Mounce
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Chad A. Krueger
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA
| | - F. Winston Gwathmey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Stephen T. Duncan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - David C. Landy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang CY, Mittu S, Da Silva Cardoso M, Rodrigues TC, Palmer WE, Gyftopoulos S. Outcomes of imaging-guided corticosteroid injections in hip and knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:2297-2308. [PMID: 36517614 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04257-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature on the use of image-guided corticosteroid injections in the treatment of patients with knee and hip OA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We conducted a comprehensive literature search through June 30, 2022. Publication type, study design, imaging guidance modality, osteoarthritis severity, number of injections, steroid type and dose, anesthetic type and dose, the total number of patients, follow-up intervals, and measured outcomes were extracted from the included studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS There were 23 included studies (10 hips, 12 knees, 1 both hip and knee). Hip injections were found to be effective in treating short- and long-term pain and more effective than hyaluronic acid, Mepivacaine, NSAIDs, and normal saline in terms of improvement in pain and/or function. There was less impact on QoL. Knee injections were found either to have little or no impact or were similar or inferior to comparison injections (intra-articular hyaluronic acid, PRP, NSAIDs, normal saline, adductor canal blocks). Study data could not be aggregated because the corticosteroid types and doses, methods of outcome assessment, and follow-up time points varied widely. CONCLUSION Our systematic review found generally positive outcomes for the hip, but overall negative outcomes for the knee, although hip injections may carry a risk of serious adverse outcomes. A larger trial with uniform methodology is warranted. Specific studies on the adverse effects of corticosteroid injections are also warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie Y Chang
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Sameer Mittu
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - William E Palmer
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Soterios Gyftopoulos
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jawetz ST, Fox MG, Blankenbaker DG, Caracciolo JT, Frick MA, Nacey N, Said N, Sharma A, Spence S, Stensby JD, Subhas N, Tubb CC, Walker EA, Yu F, Beaman FD. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Hip Pain: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S33-S48. [PMID: 37236751 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Chronic hip pain is a frequent chief complaint for adult patients who present for evaluation in a variety of clinical practice settings. Following a targeted history and physical examination, imaging plays a vital role in elucidating the etiologies of a patient's symptoms, as a wide spectrum of pathological entities may cause chronic hip pain. Radiography is usually the appropriate initial imaging test following a clinical examination. Depending on the clinical picture, advanced cross-sectional imaging may be subsequently performed for further evaluation. This documents provides best practice for the imaging workup of chronic hip pain in patients presenting with a variety of clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael G Fox
- Panel Chair, Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Donna G Blankenbaker
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jamie T Caracciolo
- Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; MSK-RADS (Bone) Committee
| | - Matthew A Frick
- Chair of Education, Department of Radiology, Chair of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nicholas Nacey
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nicholas Said
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Akash Sharma
- Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Susanna Spence
- University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER; Member of the Board of Advisors and Board of Directors for Texas Radiological Society
| | | | | | - Creighton C Tubb
- UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
| | - Eric A Walker
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Florence Yu
- Section Head, Musculoskeletal Imaging, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Primary care physician; Chair, ACR sponsored BONE-RADS Committee
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel A, Chadwick N, von Beck K, Goswami P, Soliman SB, Patel A, McGill KC. Ultrasound-guided joint interventions of the lower extremity. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:911-921. [PMID: 36042035 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04168-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to better understand the role ultrasound plays in lower extremity joint interventions. Ultrasound is an important and reliable tool diagnostically and therapeutically. Real-time feedback, lack of ionizing radiation, and dynamic maneuverability make ultrasound an important tool in the proceduralist's armament. This article will touch upon the important anatomic considerations, clinical indications, and technical step-by-step details for lower extremity ultrasound interventions. Specifically, we will look at interventions involving the hip, knee, ankle, and foot. In addition, this article will discuss the roles corticosteroid and platelet-rich plasma may play in certain interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Patel
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Nicholson Chadwick
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kelly von Beck
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pulak Goswami
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Steven B Soliman
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Arjun Patel
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kevin C McGill
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cui B, Chen Y, Tian Y, Liu H, Huang Y, Yin G, Xie Q. Effects of medications on incidence and risk of knee and hip joint replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Rheumatol 2022; 62:22. [DOI: 10.1186/s42358-022-00253-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the incidence and risk of knee and hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) treated with different medications.
Methods
OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science electronic databases were searched from inception to May 4th, 2022. Clinical trials, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case–control studies, were selected. The meta-analysis effect size was estimated using either incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or odds ratio (OR)/relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. The risk of bias and heterogeneity among studies were assessed and analyzed.
Results
Forty studies were included, involving 6,041,254 participants. The incidence of joint replacement in patients with OA varied according to the study design and treatments. The incidence of knee arthroplasty varied from 0 to 70.88%, while the incidence of hip arthroplasty varied from 11.71 to 96.43%. Compared to non-users, bisphosphonate users had a reduced risk of knee replacement (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66–0.77; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70–0.83). Compared to intra-articular corticosteroid users, hyaluronic acid (HA) users had a higher risk of knee arthroplasty (RR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.38–2.25). No publication bias was observed.
Conclusions
Bisphosphonate treatment is associated with a reduced risk of knee replacement. More studies are needed to validate our results due to the limited number of eligible studies and high heterogeneity among studies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Aksoy A, Gulcu A, Tuna MM, Aslan A. Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Clin Med�Insights�Arthritis�Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 15:11795441221118920. [PMID: 36032389 PMCID: PMC9411738 DOI: 10.1177/11795441221118920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to present the clinical results of patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis who were administered intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) or hyaluronic acid (HA), with or without fluoroscopy. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the clinics where the authors worked between 2010 and 2018. Patients with stage 2-4 hip osteoarthritis according to KL criteria were included in the study. Age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists stages, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (3rd, 6th, and 12th months) were recorded. Two groups were created as patients who underwent injection with or without fluoroscopy guidance. In group 1, CS (triamnisolone) was administered, and in group 2, sodium hyaluronate 88 mg/4 mL was administered. Obtained parameters were compared. Results: The WOMAC scores at 3 months of both the CS and HA groups were statistically significantly better than before the application, with the improvement in the CS group found to be significantly better than in the HA group (P = .047). At 6 months, the mean WOMAC scores of the CS and HA groups were better than prior to the application, and there was a statistically significant difference (P < .001). No significant difference was found in either the CS or HA group in the comparison of 12-month WOMAC scores with the baseline scores (P = .744 and P = .054). Conclusion: In symptomatic hip OA patients, intra-articular administration of CS and HA was seen to be effective at 3 and 6 months after administration. However, the effectiveness was determined to have disappeared within 1 year. Furthermore, in hip OA intra-articular drug applications, it was determined that the blinded technique without radiological guidance performed in the outpatient clinic is as effective and safe as the radiologically guided technique administered in the operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Aksoy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Alanya Education and Research Hospital, Alanya, Turkey
| | - Anil Gulcu
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical School of Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Mert Tuna
- Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Alanya Education and Research Hospital, Alanya, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Aslan
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical School of Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kanthawang T, Lee A, Baal JD, Joseph GB, Vail T, Link TM, Patel R. Predicting outcomes in patients undergoing intra-articular corticosteroid hip injections. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:1347-57. [PMID: 33247330 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03673-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the associations between clinical, procedural, and radiographic factors and outcomes of steroid hip injections, including long-term and immediate pain reduction, time to arthroplasty, time to reinjection, and the total number of injections. MATERIALS AND METHODS All intra-articular anesthetic and steroid injections of the hip under fluoroscopic guidance between January 2014 and March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Hip radiographs were scored using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scores. Immediate pain relief and response were evaluated using a change in visual analog scale and OMERACT-OARSI criteria respectively. Long-term pain relief was evaluated at 2‑7 months after injection by reviewing the medical records. Correlation between patient characteristics, procedural variations, and radiographic factors with injection outcomes was analyzed by using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS Of 361 injections, 79.8% showed an immediate pain response and 32.7% had subjective long-term pain relief (> 2 months). There was no significant correlation between immediate pain relief and response with long-term pain relief and other outcomes. Older age and higher KL score, OARSI-central joint space narrowing (JSN), and inferior acetabular osteophyte were correlated with long-term pain relief (p = 0.01‑0.03). Higher KL and OARSI grades, particularly JSN, were significantly correlated with increased immediate pain relief and total number of injections but decreased time to arthroplasty. Baseline pain positively correlated with immediate pain response (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Older patients with higher grades of radiographic OA and high baseline pain were good candidates for steroid injections, particularly for those patients awaiting hip arthroplasty.
Collapse
|
8
|
Urits I, Orhurhu V, Powell J, Murthy A, Kiely B, Shipon S, Kaye RJ, Kaye AD, Arron BL, Cornett EM, Viswanath O. Minimally Invasive Therapies for Osteoarthritic Hip Pain: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2020; 24:37. [PMID: 32506251 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00874-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent cause of chronic hip pain, affecting 27% of adults aged over 45 years and 42% of adults aged over 75 years. Though OA has traditionally been described as a disorder of "wear-and-tear," recent studies have expanded on this understanding to include a possible inflammatory etiology as well, damage to articular cartilage produces debris in the joint that is phagocytosed by synovial cells which leads to inflammation. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with OA of the hip frequently have decreased quality of life due to pain and limited mobility though additional comorbidities of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, poor sleep quality, and obesity have been correlated. Initial treatment with conservative medical management can provide effective symptomatic relief. Physical therapy and exercise are important components of a multimodal approach to osteoarthritic hip pain. Patients with persistent pain may benefit from minimally invasive therapeutic approaches prior to consideration of undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this review is to provide an update of current minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of pain stemming from hip osteoarthritis; these include intra-articular injection of medication, regenerative therapies, and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Urits
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Vwaire Orhurhu
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jordan Powell
- University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Anu Murthy
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brendon Kiely
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Samara Shipon
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Rachel J Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
- Medical University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Brett L Arron
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Elyse M Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhong HM, Zhao GF, Lin T, Zhang XX, Li XY, Lin JF, Zhao SQ, Pan ZJ. Intra-Articular Steroid Injection for Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int 2020; 2020:6320154. [PMID: 32185212 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6320154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this current review was to confirm the efficacy of intra-articular steroid therapy (IAST) for patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and discuss the duration and influential factors of IAST. Methods Online databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to May 2019. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and noncontrolled trials assessing the efficacy of hip IAST on pain were included. Common demographics data were extracted using a standardized form. Quality was assessed on the basis of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence. Results 12 trials met the inclusion criteria. According to data from individual trials, IAST had significant efficacy on hip OA in both immediate and delay pain reduction, which persisted up to 12 weeks after IAST. The influences of the baseline severity of hip OA or synovitis and injection dose or volume on the clinical outcome of IAST were still controversial. The IAST appeared to be well tolerant by most of the participants. Conclusion IAST was proved to be an efficacious therapy in both immediate and delay pain reduction for hip OA patients within 12 weeks. The longer follow-up data of efficacy and safety and potentially influential factors are still unclear and needed further confirmation.
Collapse
|