The successful medical management of severe duodenal strictures secondary to eosinophilic gastroenteritis in an infant

Eosinophilic enteritis requiring differentiation from chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 gene: A case report

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is a disorder characterized by infiltration of eosinophils causing mucosal damage and dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract. The endoscopic findings of eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), an EGID variant, are nonspecific and occasionally difficult to diagnose. In contrast, chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 (CEAS) is a chronic persistent small intestinal disorder characterized by endoscopic findings such as multiple oblique and circular ulcers.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 10-year-old boy who had suffered abdominal pain and fatigue for the preceding 6 mo. He was referred to our institute for investigation of suspected gastrointestinal bleeding because of severe anemia with hypoproteinemia and positive fecal human hemoglobin. The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic findings were normal; however, double-balloon small bowel endoscopy showed multiple oblique and circular ulcers with discrete margins and mild constriction of the intestinal lumen in the ileum. The findings were highly consistent with CEAS, but urine prostaglandin metabolites were within normal limits, and no previously reported mutations in the SLCO2A1 gene were identified. Histological evaluation demonstrated moderate to severe eosinophilic infiltration localized to the small intestine suggesting a diagnosis of EoN. Clinical remission was maintained with montelukast and a partial elemental diet, but emergent surgery for bowel obstruction due to small intestinal stenosis was performed two years after the initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

EoN should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CEAS-like small intestinal ulcerative lesions and normal urinary prostaglandin metabolite levels.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is an infrequently diagnosed condition that is characterized by prominent eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach or small intestine, generally localized to one level of the intestinal wall; the variable organ locus and wall depth produce heterogeneous clinical presentations. A strong association with atopy is present in most cases, supported by circumstantial evidence and the demonstration of Th-2 proinflammatory cytokine profiles in animal studies. A high degree of suspicion is required to establish the diagnosis, which must be based on intense gastrointestinal eosinophilia. Management is directed toward removal of offending allergens and use of anti-inflammatory agents. Novel and emerging treatments on the horizon are biologic therapies and selective anti-eosinophil agents.

Eosinophils and allergic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract

The association between increased tissue eosinophilia and allergic disease is particularly striking in the case of the gastrointestinal tract. About 80% of individuals with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are atopic, while half of the patients with gastrointestinal allergy show tissue eosinophilia. The function of eosinophils in gastrointestinal allergic disorders is unclear; however, a proinflammatory action is most likely. Cytokines (interleukins 5 and 3, granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor) and chemokines (eotaxin, RANTES, etc.) released by Th2 lymphocytes, mast cells and other tissue cells have been identified as major regulators of eosinophil chemotaxis and activation, but a convincing mechanism by which eosinophils are activated in an allergen-dependent manner is still lacking. The diagnostic approach comprises both histological and laboratory methods to assess eosinophilia and eosinophil activation, as well as tools to assess the allergic disease while excluding other gastrointestinal diseases such as food intolerances, infections and tumours. Treatment of allergic EGIDs includes elimination or elemental diets and drug therapy using classical anti-allergic agents such as topical corticosteroids and new approaches such as LTD4 receptor antagonists or antibodies against IL-5 or eotaxin.

Anesthesia for pediatric lithotripsy

SUMMARY BACKGROUND

We describe 7 years experience of providing anesthesia for children undergoing lithotripsy in a hospital without pediatric inpatient facilities. A pediatric team, including anesthetist, pediatric nurse along with the equipment travel across the city with the patient from the children's hospital. As a high incidence of postoperative vomiting and discomfort was observed, the effect of increasing intraoperative analgesia and the use of antiemetic medication was examined.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2004, 69 children (49 boys and 20 girls) were anesthetized for 120 procedures: 67 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and 53 endosurgical procedures, consisting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (29), ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (17) and percutaneous bladder litholapaxy (7). The mean age was 5.4 years (10 months to 13 years) and weight 23.7 kg (7.1-59 kg). ESWL was performed initially with a Wolf Piezolith 2300, and after 1999, a Dornier Compact Delta.

RESULTS

Increased administration of intraoperative analgesia resulted in reduced postoperative analgesia requirements in all the groups, with a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in the endosurgical group. Those who required more postoperative analgesia had more vomiting significantly (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For ESWL postoperative pain is dependent on the type of lithotriptor and the resultant stone fragment size created. This study suggests that postoperative vomiting could be reduced more effectively by the increased administration of intraoperative analgesia, than by a single intraoperative dose of an antiemetic drug.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis despite its uncommon occurrence is one of the most important primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and most commonly presents with abdominal pain. The terminology is, however, misleading because all levels of the gastrointestinal tract from the esophagus to the rectum may be affected. A history of atopy and allergies is present in 25-75% cases. The heterogeneity in the clinical presentations of EG is determined by the site and depth of eosinophilic infiltration. Eosinophilic intestinal inflammation also occurs secondarily in the gastrointestinal tract in inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune diseases, as reactions to medications, infections, hypereosinophilia syndrome, and after solid organ transplantation. Recent investigations providing an insight into the pathogenesis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis support a critical role for allergens, eosinophils, Th-2 type cytokines, and eotaxin in mediating eosinophilic inflammation. The diagnosis is confirmed by demonstrating prominent tissue eosinophilia on histopathology. Treatment recommendations based on data extrapolated from retrospective, uncontrolled studies, and expert opinion support the use of restricted diets, corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and mast cell stabilizers. Many unanswered questions remain with regard to the natural history, optimal duration of therapy, safer steroid-sparing long-term treatment agents, and the means of reliable and non-invasive follow-up.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of food protein-induced gastrointestinal diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although our general understanding of food hypersensitivity has improved in recent years, gastrointestinal food protein-induced diseases still pose diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Food allergy in children and adults may involve any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical presentations include protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, enteropathy and proctocolitis, as well as eosinophilic gastroenteritis and related disorders. For many of these conditions, our understanding of the pathophysiology is incomplete. Manifestations are mostly non-IgE mediated, and skin prick testing and measurement of food-specific IgE antibody levels are of limited diagnostic value. Atopy patch testing may be of benefit in identifying food items associated with late-onset gastrointestinal reactions. A definitive diagnosis of gastrointestinal food allergy, however, still relies on formal food challenges. Depending on the clinical presentation, gastrointestinal biopsies may be required. In infancy, hypoallergenic formula or maternal elimination diets have been shown to effectively control the gastrointestinal manifestations of food allergies. Growth parameters and micronutrient levels need to be carefully monitored while on elimination diets for prolonged periods. In older children and adults with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, the response to dietary restriction is variable. Corticosteroids may be required to control symptoms in those who failed to respond to hypoallergenic diets. In eosinophilic esophagitis, steroids can be administered topically in the form of swallowed aerosols. Leukotriene receptor antagonists and other novel therapies may be useful as steroid-sparing agents.

SUMMARY

Early diagnosis and treatment of food protein-induced gastrointestinal diseases may prevent significant nutritional complications. Further research is needed to develop diagnostic tools for these mainly cell-mediated disorders.