Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation

Perineal herniorrhaphy with pedunculated tunica vaginalis communis in dogs: Description of the technique and clinical case series

Background

Perineal hernia (PH) in dogs is caused by the separation of the anal septal muscles and the displacement of pelvic/abdominal organs under the perineal skin. Reconstruction of the pelvic septum by surgical repositioning is the only curative treatment.

Objectives

To describe the procedure and outcomes of surgical repair using the pedunculated tunica vaginalis communis (TVC) for PH in dogs.

Methods

Intact male dogs diagnosed with PH were included in this study. For surgery, each dog was positioned in the Trendelenburg position. Castration was performed with the open technique, followed by colopexy and cystopexy via laparotomy. The remaining bilateral TVCs transposed to the opening of PH were used for the perineal herniorrhaphy. Intraoperative findings, complications, and outcomes were evaluated and recorded.

Results

Eight dogs [median age 10.5 years (range, 9–13 years); median body weight 4.9 kg (range, 1.6–12.3 kg)] were treated using the TVC surgical technique. Perineal herniorrhaphy with the TVC was feasible in all dogs. The median operation time was 105.5 min (range, 46–149 min) in unilateral PH, and 92 and 122 min in two dogs with bilateral PH. Short-term postoperative complications during hospitalization did not occur in six dogs, whereas the residual two dogs had a temporary local infection as a minor complication. Postoperative recurrence occurred in one dog (13%) on postoperative day 136.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the herniorrhaphy technique using the pedunculated TVC is an alternative option for the repair of PH in dogs.

Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The use of mesh in ventral hernia repair becomes especially challenging when associated with a contaminated field. Permanent synthetic mesh use in this setting is currently debated and this discussion is yet to be resolved clinically or in the literature. We aim to systematically assess postoperative outcomes of non-absorbable synthetic mesh (NASM) used in ventral hernia repair in the setting of contamination.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library identified all articles from 2000-2020 that examined the use of NASM for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Qualitative analysis was completed for all included studies using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Of 630 distinct publications and 104 requiring full review, this study included 17 articles published between 2007 and 2020. Meta-analysis demonstrated absorbable mesh was associated with more HR (OR 1.89, 1.15-3.12, p = 0.008), SSO (OR 1.43, 0.96-2.11, p = 0.087), SSI (OR 2.84, 1.85-4.35, p < 0.001), and unplanned reoperation (OR 1.99, 1.19-3.32, p = 0.009) compared to NASM.

CONCLUSION

The use of NASM for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field may be a safe alternative to absorbable mesh, as evidenced by lower rates of postoperative complications. This review counters the current clinical paradigm, and additional prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Simultaneous quantification of protein-DNA interactions and transcriptomes in single cells with scDam&T-seq

Protein-DNA interactions are essential for establishing cell type-specific chromatin architecture and gene expression. We recently developed scDam&T-seq, a multi-omics method that can simultaneously quantify protein-DNA interactions and the transcriptome in single cells. The method effectively combines two existing methods: DNA adenine methyltransferase identification (DamID) and CEL-Seq2. DamID works through the tethering of a protein of interest (POI) to the Escherichia coli DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam). Upon expression of this fusion protein, DNA in proximity to the POI is methylated by Dam and can be selectively digested and amplified. CEL-Seq2, in contrast, makes use of poly-dT primers to reverse transcribe mRNA, followed by linear amplification through in vitro transcription. scDam&T-seq is the first technique capable of providing a combined readout of protein-DNA contact and transcription from single-cell samples. Once suitable cell lines have been established, the protocol can be completed in 5 d, with a throughput of hundreds to thousands of cells. The processing of raw sequencing data takes an additional 1-2 d. Our method can be used to understand the transcriptional changes a cell undergoes upon the DNA binding of a POI. It can be performed in any laboratory with access to FACS, robotic and high-throughput-sequencing facilities.

Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia

BACKGROUND

The use of absorbable meshes during contaminated or infected incisional hernia (IH) repair is associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates. Biological meshes might be more appropriate but have been described in highly heterogeneous series. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of absorbable vs. biological meshes for the treatment of contaminated or infected IH in a homogeneous series with a standardized technique.

METHODS

Data of all patients operated on between 2008 and 2015 for contaminated or infected IH, using an absorbable (A) Vicryl® or a biological (B) Strattice® mesh, were reviewed. Patient characteristics, infectious complication rates, and recurrence-free outcome (RFO) were compared between the two groups. A propensity score methodology was applied to a Cox regression model to deal with unbalanced characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

Patient demographics in A (n = 57) and in B (n = 24) were similar except that B patients had larger parietal defects (p < 0.001) and higher Center for Disease Control (CDC) wound class (p = 0.034). Patients in A had statistically significantly more postoperative early (61.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.03) and late (31.2% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.046) infectious complications. Six-, 12-, and 36-month RFO rates were 77%, 47%, and 24%, and 96%, 87%, and 82% in A and B, respectively, p < 0.001. Raw multivariable Cox regression analysis found that B (HR = 0.1, 95% CI [0.03-0.34], p < 0.001) was independently associated with prolonged RFO (HR = 0.091, 95% CI [0.045-0.180], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Biological meshes seem to be superior to absorbable meshes in patients with contaminated or infected incisional hernia. These results need to be confirmed by prospective randomized trials.

Comparison of coated meshes for intraperitoneal placement in animal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh in hernia repair can result in adhesions leading to intestinal obstruction and fistulation. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the effects of mesh coatings reducing the tissue-to-mesh adhesion in animal studies.

METHODS

Pubmed and Embase were systematically searched. Animal experiments comparing intraperitoneally placed meshes with coatings were eligible for inclusion. Only studies with comparable follow-up, measurements, and species were included for data pooling and subsequent meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 131 articles met inclusion criteria, with four studies integrated into one comparison and five studies integrated into another comparison. Compared to uncoated polypropylene (PP) mesh, PP mesh coated with hyaluronic acid/carboxymethyl cellulose (HA/CMC) showed significantly reduced adhesion formation at follow-up of 4 weeks measured with adhesion score of extent (random effects model, mean difference,-  0.96, 95% CI - 1.32 to - 0.61, P < 0.001, I² = 23%; fixed effects model, mean difference,- 0.94, 95% CI - 1.25 to - 0.63, P < 0.001, I² = 23%). Compared to PP mesh, polyester mesh coated with collagen (PC mesh) showed no significant difference at follow-up of 4 weeks regarding percentage of adhesion-area on a mesh, using random effects model (mean difference - 11.69, 95% CI - 44.14 to 20.76, P = 0.48, I² = 92%). However, this result differed using fixed effects model (mean difference - 25.55, 95% CI - 33.70 to - 7.40, P < 0.001, I² = 92%).

CONCLUSION

HA/CMC coating reduces adhesion formation to PP mesh effectively at a follow-up of 4 weeks, while the anti-adhesive properties of PC mesh are inclusive comparing all study data.

Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen

PURPOSE

To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats.

METHODS

After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh implant: polypropylene group, polypropylene/polyglecaprone group, and polyester/porcine collagen group. The macroscopic evaluation of the extent and intensity of adhesions was performed 21 days after the implant.

RESULTS

The polypropylene group had a higher statistically significant impairment due to visceral adhesions (p value = 0.002) and a higher degree of intense adherence in relation to polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen groups (p value<0.001). The polyester/porcine collagen group showed more intense adhesions than the polypropylene/polyglecaprone group (p value=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene meshes to correct defects of the abdominal wall caused the appearance of extensive and firm adhesions to intra-abdominal structures. The use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone or polyester/porcine collagen tissue-separating meshes reduces the number and degree of adhesions formed.

Non-Cross-Linked Collagen Mesh Performs Best in a Physiologic, Noncontaminated Rat Model

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, direct contact between the prosthesis and abdominal viscera is inevitable and may lead to adhesions. Despite the large variety of mesh prosthesis, little is known about their in vivo behavior. Biological meshes are considered to have many advantages, but due to their price they are rarely used. A rat model was used to assess biological and conventional synthetic meshes on their in vivo characteristics.

DESIGN

One-hundred twenty male Wistar rats were randomized into five groups of 24 rats. A mesh was implanted intraperitoneally and fixated with nonresorbable sutures. The following five meshes were implanted: Parietene (polypropylene), Permacol (cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix), Strattice (non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix), XCM Biologic (non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix), and Omyra Mesh (condensed polytetrafluoroethylene). The rats were sacrificed after 30, 90, or 180 days. Incorporation, shrinkage, adhesions, abscess formation, and histology were assessed for all meshes.

RESULTS

All animals thrived postoperatively. After 180 days, Permacol, Parietene, and Omyra Mesh had a significantly better incorporation than Strattice ( P = .001, P = .019, and P = .037 respectively). After 180 days, Strattice had significantly fewer adhesions on the surface of the mesh than Parietene ( P < .001), Omyra Mesh ( P = .011), and Permacol ( P = .027). After 30 days, Permacol had significantly stronger adhesions than Strattice ( P = .030). However, this difference was not significant anymore after 180 days. After 180 days, there was significantly less shrinkage in Permacol than in Strattice ( P = .001) and Omyra Mesh ( P = .050).

CONCLUSION

Based on incorporation, adhesions, mesh shrinkage, and histologic parameters, Strattice performed best in this experimental rat model.

Comparison of Surgisis, Vypro II and TiMesh in contaminated and clean field

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate the histologic properties and infection resistance of three different mesh materials in a rat model.

METHODS

Each mesh, in both infectious (n = 96) and non-infectious groups (n = 270), was positioned both in sublay (preperitoneally) and onlay (subcutaneously) locations. Properties of the biological (Surgisis; Cook Surgical), composite, partially resorbing (Vypro II mesh; Ethicon) and non-resorbing (TiMesh; GFE Medizintechnik GmbH) mesh were evaluated and compared. Animals were killed at 7, 21 and 90 days after implantation. The following parameters were evaluated to assess the host response to the mesh material: inflammation, vascularization, fibrosis, collagen formation, Ki67, and a foreign body reaction by granuloma formation (FBG).

RESULTS

Surgisis mesh produced more pronounced inflammation and cell proliferation, and less intense granuloma formation, as well as fibrosis, compared to the other two groups. When the infected materials were examined, we found signs of local infection to be more often present in Surgisis group of animals.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of bacterial contamination, no benefits were observed in the use of the Surgisis prosthesis over the use of TiMesh and Vypro II.

Repair of complex abdominal wall hernias with a cross-linked porcine acellular matrix: cross-sectional results of a Dutch cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of synthetic mesh in potentially contaminated and contaminated incisional hernias may lead to a higher morbidity and mortality. Biological meshes may provide a solution, but since these meshes are rarely used, little is known about long-term results. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction following Permacol™ in complex abdominal wall hernia repair (CAWHR) patients in a cross-sectional fashion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were operated for CAWHR with Permacol™ in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2012. The design was a multicenter cross-sectional cohort study. The STROCSS statement was followed. Patients were interviewed, underwent abdominal examination, and completed quality-of-life questionnaires. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02166112. Research Registry Identifier researchregistry4713.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were seen in the outpatient clinic. Their hernias were classified as potentially contaminated in 25 patients (32.5%) and infected in 52 patients (67.5%). The mean follow-up was 22.2 ± 12.6 months. The most frequent postoperative complication was wound infection (n = 21; 27.3%), meshes had to be removed in five patients (6.5%). By the time of their visit to the outpatient clinic, 22 patients (28.6%) had a recurrence of whom ten (13%) had undergone reoperation. Thirty-nine patients (50.6%) had bulging of the abdominal wall. Quality-of-life questionnaires revealed that patients graded their health status with a mean 6.8 (± 1.8) out of 10 points.

CONCLUSION

Bulging and recurrence are frequently observed in patients treated with Permacol™ for CAWHR. Considering both recurrence and bulging as undesirable outcomes of treatment, a total of 46 patients (59.7%) had an unfavorable outcome. Infection rates were high, but comparable with similar patient cohorts. Quality-of-life questionnaires revealed that patients were satisfied with their general health, but scored significantly lower on most quality-of-life modalities of the Short Form-36 questionnaire.

Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure

Background

Achieving stable closure of complex or contaminated abdominal wall incisions remains challenging. This study aimed to characterize the stage of innovation for biological mesh devices used during complex abdominal wall reconstruction and to evaluate the quality of current evidence.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of published and ongoing studies between January 2000 and September 2017. Eligible studies were those where a biological mesh was used to support fascial closure, either prophylactically after midline laparotomy, or for reinforcement after repair of incisional hernia with midline incision. The primary outcome measure was the IDEAL framework stage of innovation. The key secondary outcome measure was the GRADE criteria for study quality.

Results

Thirty‐five studies including 2681 patients were included. Four studies considered mesh prophylaxis, 23 considered hernia repair, and eight reported on both. There was one published randomized trial (IDEAL stage 3), none of which was of high quality; the others were non‐randomized studies (IDEAL stage 2a). A detailed description of surgical technique was provided in most studies (27 of 35); however, no study reported outcomes according to the European Hernia Society consensus statement and only two described quality control of surgical technique during the study. From 21 ongoing randomized trials and observational studies, 11 considered repair of incisional hernia and 10 considered prophylaxis (seven in elective settings).

Conclusion

The evidence base for biological mesh is limited, and better reporting and quality control of surgical techniques are needed. Although results of ongoing trials over the next decade will improve the evidence base, further study is required in the emergency and contaminated settings.

Lightweight, Highly Permeable, Biocompatible, and Antiadhesive Composite Meshes for Intraperitoneal Repairs

Ventral hernia is a public health issue and millions of meshes are used to repair abdominal wall defects every year. Polypropylene-based composite meshes represent an important class of materials for intraperitoneal repair, but the meshes generally give rise to infection, seroma, migration, and adhesion, leading to severe consequence or even reoperation. Here, a facile and versatile one-way fabrication of lightweight, highly permeable, and biocompatible composite meshes with superior antiadhesion properties is proposed by modifying polypropylene meshes with well-defined polydopamine nanocoating. The resulting composite meshes are found to significantly enhance the biocompatibility and antiadhesion effect in rat model. The scalable production and excellent biomedical properties of composite meshes make them a promising candidate for future-generation ventral hernia repair materials.

Promoting early neovascularization of SIS-repaired abdominal wall by controlled release of bioactive VEGF

Insufficient early neovascularization post-operation is thought to be the main reason of surgical recurrence of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS)-repaired abdominal wall defects.

Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

The aim of our retrospective analysis was to compare the results of incisional hernia repair by porcine small intestinal submucosa-derived (SIS) meshes with those obtained by alloplastic polypropylene-based (PP) meshes in comparable surgical indications by matched-pair design. We hypothesized that in incisional hernia, SIS mesh repair is associated with fewer recurrences and SSO than PP mesh repair in incisional hernias.

METHODS

Twenty-four matched pairs (SIS vs. PP mesh repair between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2013) were identified by matching criteria: gender, age, comorbidities, body mass index, EHS hernia classification, mesh implantation technique, CDC wound classification, and source of contamination/primary surgery leading to incisional hernia. Minimal follow-up time was 24 months. Means and standard deviations were compared by paired t test; categorial data were compared by McNemar's test. Poisson's distribution and negative binominal distribution were employed to detect significant correlation.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in the pre- and perioperative factors and the follow-up times. There were significantly more wound complications (19 vs. 12, p = 0.041), longer hospital stay (22.0 ± 6.3 vs. 12.0 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.010), and significantly more recurrent hernias (25 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.004) after SIS mesh repair. Both the Poisson's distribution and the negative binominal distribution unveiled significantly more complication points (3-6 vs. 1-2) per month after SIS mesh repair.

CONCLUSION

There is no advantage of SIS meshes compared to PP meshes in incisional hernia repair with different degrees of wound contamination in this matched-pair analysis. Further prospective and randomized trials or at least registry studies such as the EHS register with standardized and defined conditions are warranted.

Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions

PURPOSE

To compare the polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) to Vicryl®, Parietex composite® and Ultrapro® meshes to assess the occurrence of adhesions in the intraperitoneal implantation.

METHODS

Sixty Wistar rats were allocated into three groups: PP+V, in which all the animals received a polypropylene and a Vicryl® mesh; PP+PC, with the implantation of polypropylene and Parietex composite® meshes and PP+UP, in which there was implantation of polypropylene and Ultrapro®. Macroscopic analysis was performed 28 days later to assess the percentage of mesh area affected by adhesion.

RESULTS

in the PP+ V group, the Vicryl® mesh showed lower adhesion formation (p=0.013). In the PP+PC, there were no differences between polypropylene and Parietex composite® (p=0.765). In the PP+UP group, Ultrapro® and polypropylene meshes were equivalent (p=0.198) .

CONCLUSION

All the four meshes led to adhesions, with the Vicryl® mesh showing the least potential for its formation.

Evaluation of a Novel Hybrid Viable Bioprosthetic Mesh in a Model of Mesh Infection

Background:

The reported incidence of mesh infection in contaminated operative fields is as high as 30% regardless of material used. Our laboratory previously showed that augmenting acellular bioprosthetic mesh with allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) enhances resistance to bacterial colonization in vivo and preserves mesh integrity. This study’s aim was to determine whether augmentation of non-crosslinked porcine dermis (Strattice) with commercially available, cryopreserved, viable MSC-containing human placental tissue (Stravix) similarly improves infection resistance after inoculation with Escherichia coli (E. coli) using an established mesh infection model.

Methods:

Stravix was thawed per manufacturer’s instructions and 2 samples were tested for cell viability using a Live/Dead Cell assay at the time of surgery. Rats (N = 20) were implanted subcutaneously with 1 piece of Strattice and 1 piece of hybrid mesh (Strattice + Stravix sutured at the corners). Rats were inoculated with either sterile saline or 10⁶ colony-forming units of E. coli before wound closure (n = 10 per group). At 4 weeks, explants underwent microbiologic and histologic analyses.

Results:

In E. coli–inoculated animals, severe or complete mesh degradation concurrent with abscess formation was observed in 100% (10/10) hybrid meshes and 90% (9/10) Strattice meshes. Histologic evaluation determined that meshes inoculated with E. coli exhibited severe acute inflammation, which correlated with bacterial recovery (P < 0.001). Viability assays performed at the time of surgery failed to verify the presence of numerous live cells in Stravix.

Conclusions:

Stravix cryopreserved MSC-containing human umbilical tissue does not improve infection resistance of a bioprosthetic mesh in vivo in rats after inoculation with E. coli.

Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Bacterial Clearance and Preserve Bioprosthetic Integrity in a Model of Mesh Infection

Background:

The reported incidence of mesh infection in contaminated operative fields is as high as 30% regardless of the material used. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to possess favorable immunomodulatory properties and improve tissue incorporation when seeded onto bioprosthetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether seeding noncrosslinked bovine pericardium (Veritas Collagen Matrix) with allogeneic bone marrow–derived MSCs improves infection resistance in vivo after inoculation with Escherichia coli (E. coli).

Methods:

Rat bone marrow–derived MSCs at passage 3 were seeded onto bovine pericardium and cultured for 7 days before implantation. Additional rats (n = 24) were implanted subcutaneously with MSC-seeded or unseeded mesh and inoculated with 7 × 10⁵ colony-forming units of E. coli or saline before wound closure (group 1, unseeded mesh/saline; group 2, unseeded mesh/E. coli; group 3, MSC-seeded mesh/E. coli; 8 rats per group). Meshes were explanted at 4 weeks and underwent microbiologic and histologic analyses.

Results:

MSC-seeded meshes inoculated with E. coli demonstrated superior bacterial clearance and preservation of mesh integrity compared with E. coli–inoculated unseeded meshes (87.5% versus 0% clearance; p = 0.001). Complete mesh degradation concurrent with abscess formation was observed in 100% of rats in the unseeded/E. coli group, which is in contrast to 12.5% of rats in the MSC-seeded/E. coli group. Histologic evaluation determined that remodeling characteristics of E. coli–inoculated MSC-seeded meshes were similar to those of uninfected meshes 4 weeks after implantation.

Conclusions:

Augmenting a bioprosthetic material with stem cells seems to markedly enhance resistance to bacterial infection in vivo and preserve mesh integrity.

Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design

Surgical mesh has become an indispensable tool in hernia repair to improve outcomes and reduce costs; however, efforts are constantly being undertaken in mesh development to overcome postoperative complications. Common complications include infection, pain, adhesions, mesh extrusion and hernia recurrence. Reducing the complications of mesh implantation is of utmost importance given that hernias occur in hundreds of thousands of patients per year in the United States. In the present review, the authors present the different types of hernia meshes, discuss the key properties of mesh design, and demonstrate how each design element affects performance and complications. The present article will provide a basis for surgeons to understand which mesh to choose for patient care and why, and will explain the important technological aspects that will continue to evolve over the ensuing years.

Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design

Surgical mesh has become an indispensable tool in hernia repair to improve outcomes and reduce costs; however, efforts are constantly being undertaken in mesh development to overcome postoperative complications. Common complications include infection, pain, adhesions, mesh extrusion and hernia recurrence. Reducing the complications of mesh implantation is of utmost importance given that hernias occur in hundreds of thousands of patients per year in the United States. In the present review, the authors present the different types of hernia meshes, discuss the key properties of mesh design, and demonstrate how each design element affects performance and complications. The present article will provide a basis for surgeons to understand which mesh to choose for patient care and why, and will explain the important technological aspects that will continue to evolve over the ensuing years.

Retro-rectus repair of complex incisional hernia leads to low recurrence rate

BACKGROUND

To assess the outcome of retro-rectus repair of complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) in a single institution in relation to the use of biologic and synthetic mesh.

METHOD

A retrospective review was undertaken of complex abdominal wall repairs performed by a single surgical team, assessing the outcome of the retro-rectus repair and factors affecting the outcome.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2013, 57 (33 male) patients underwent CAWR retro-rectus repair. The material used was assessed as either synthetic or biologic (cross-linked porcine dermal collagen). The Ventral Hernia Working Group grades were similar between groups of patients having a repair with synthetic and biologic mesh. Median follow-up in the synthetic group was 18 months (1-80.5) and 18.4 months (0.5-70.7) in the biologic group. There was no statistical difference in seroma, wound infection or haematoma rates. No fistulae occurred in either group. Overall recurrence was 3.4% and there was no statistical difference between groups.

CONCLUSION

The retro-rectus repair technique is associated with a low rate of recurrence and is now the technique of choice. The choice of material, biologic or synthetic, in Ventral Hernia Working Group grades 1-3 remains controversial.

Remodeling of Noncrosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrices in a Rabbit Model of Ventral Hernia Repair

Background: Bioprostheses represent a significant advance in the abdominal wall reconstruction since they become degraded until their complete elimination in the recipient organism. This study examines remodeling in the host of three noncrosslinked porcine dermal collagen biomeshes: Strattice™ (St; LifeCell Corp.), XCM Biologic® Tissue Matrix (XCM; Synthes CMF) and Protexa® (Pr; Deco Med S.R.L.). Methods: Partial ventral hernia defects created in New Zealand White rabbits were repaired using the biomeshes that were placed in an inlay, preperitoneal position. At 14 and 90 days after implantation, explants were assessed in terms of their host tissue incorporation by morphological studies, collagen gene/protein expression (quantitative real-time PCR/immunofluorescence), macrophage response (immunohistochemistry) and biomechanical strength. Results: There were no cases of mortality or infection. Among our macroscopic findings, the mesh detachment detected in one third of the Pr implants at 90 days was of note. The host tissue response to all the biomeshes was similar at both time points, with a tendency observed for their encapsulation. There were no appreciable signs of mesh degradation. The extent of host tissue infiltration and collagenization was greater for St and Pr than for XCM. Macrophages were observed in zones of inflammation and tissue infiltration inside the mesh. XCM showed a greater macrophage response at 90 days (p < 0.05). Improved tensile strength was observed for St (p < 0.05) over Pr and unrepaired defects. Conclusions:St showed the best behavior, featuring good collagenization and tensile strength while also inducing a minimal foreign body reaction.

Imaging visceral adhesion to polymeric mesh using pneumoperitoneal-MRI in an experimental rat model

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal mesh implantation is often associated with formation of adhesion to the mesh. This experimental study examines the potential of minimally invasive pneumoperitoneal-MRI to assess these adhesions in a preclinical context.

METHODS

Uncoated polyethylene terephthalate meshes were placed intraperitoneally in rats, in regard to the caecum previously scraped to promote petechial bleeding and subsequent adhesions. Examinations were performed 2-weeks post mesh implantation using a rodent dedicated high field MRI. Respiratory-triggered T2-weighted images were acquired prior to and after intraperitoneal injection of ~8-10 mL gas to induce a mechanical stress on the abdominal wall.

RESULTS

Adhesions are occasionally seen in sham-operated rats as opposed to rats receiving polyethylene terephthalate meshes. On high-resolution images, meshes can be detected due to their characteristic net shape. However, evidence of adherence is only found if intraperitoneal gas injection is performed, when a ~1-cm elevation of the abdominal wall is observed. When adherence occurs between the mesh and the caecum, the latter remains in contact with the wall. Looser adherences between visceral tissue and meshes are also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

T2-weighted pneumoperitoneal-MRI is a powerful tool for assessing adherence after intraperitoneal mesh implantation. According to the mini-invasive procedure adopted here, this approach may allow a temporal follow-up of adherence fate.

Extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal behavior of several biological meshes currently used to repair abdominal wall defects

BACKGROUND

This study compares the behavior of several cross- and noncrosslinked biomeshes (Permacol®, CollaMend®, Surgisis®, Tutomesh®, and Strattice®) currently used for abdominal wall repair when implanted intraperitoneally and extraperitoneally. Material and Methods. Intraperitoneal (IP) implants were fixed on the parietal peritoneum and partial abdominal wall defects (EP) were repaired using each of the biomeshes, in the rabbit abdominal wall. After 90 days of implant, the biomeshes were examined to assess biomesh degradation, collagen I and III expression (Sirius red staining) and the host macrophage response (immunohistochemistry). Results. Following implant, the thinner noncrosslinked biomeshes Tutomesh and Surgisis, were almost fully degraded in both models. In contrast, Strattice behavior was similar to crosslinked biomeshes, showing negligible degree of degradation. This mesh also showed high expression of collagen I, similar to the crosslinked. The noncrosslinked materials elicited lower macrophage counts, significantly so for Strattice. In IP and EP models, Permacol showed similarly high macrophages while counts were lower for CollaMend and Surgisis in the EP model. Conclusions. The intra or extraperitoneal implant of the different meshes did not affect host tissue incorporation or mesh degradation. The crosslinked biomeshes induced a more intense macrophage response regardless of their IP or EP location.