Disparate effects of chronic and acute theophylline on cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity

Peri-transplant aminophylline in pediatric kidney transplant recipients of donation after brain death: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

During kidney transplantation, the transplanted kidney undergoes ischemia reperfusion injury, with adenosine being a major mediator. This study aimed to assess whether aminophylline, an adenosine receptor antagonist, improves early graft function and reduces incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and slow graft function (SGF).

METHODS

Single center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Pediatric patients admitted for renal transplantation from donation after brain death donors were randomized into a treatment arm receiving aminophylline and a placebo arm receiving normal saline infusions. Primary outcome was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 5 days post-transplant. Secondary outcomes were rates of DGF/SGF and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were randomized to aminophylline and 27 to placebo. There was no difference in day 5 eGFR, rate of DGF/SGF, or urine NGAL/Creatinine level between aminophylline vs. placebo arm (eGFR 67.39 ± 38.9 ml/min/1.73m² vs. 80.48 ± 52.1 ml/min/1.73m²p = 0.32; DGF/SGF 5/23 (21.7%) vs. 3/27 (11.1%) p = 0.31; urine NGAL/creatinine 300.5 ng/mg IQR 105.5-1464.5 ng/mg vs. 425.4 ng/mg IQR 140.3-1126.2 ng/mg, p = 0.95; respectively). At 12 months, there was 100% patient survival and 98% graft survival. eGFR at 12 months was similar between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no benefit in peri-transplant aminophylline administration. Our results are limited by small sample size, since sample calculations were based on primary outcome of day 5 eGFR and low rate of DGF/SGF, which may have precluded us from demonstrating efficacy. Further clinical studies are necessary to determine any benefit of aminophylline in kidney transplant recipients, particularly from high-risk donors.

The effects of A2B receptor modulators on vascular endothelial growth factor and nitric oxide axis in chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

Introduction:

To investigate the actions of adenosine A_2B receptor modulators on VEGF and NO levels in CsA nephropathy.

Materials and Methods:

Nephropathy was induced by administrating 25 mg/kg (s.c) of CsA for 5 weeks. The VEGF and NO levels were measured in kidney tissue. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, urinary albumin excretion, blood urea nitrogen, kidney pathology score were measured to assess renal function. The analysis of mRNA expression of A_2B receptor and VEGF was performed.

Results:

Administration of CsA for 5 weeks induced adverse renal function. The mRNA expression of VEGF was reduced in renal tissue after 5 weeks of CsA treatment. The renal VEGF and NO levels were also reduced in these animals. In vivo administration of A_2B adenosine receptor agonist increased renal VEGF which was inhibited by a selective A_2B AR antagonist (MRS1754) in CsA-treated animals. The increase in VEGF was associated with reversal of adverse renal functions. The effects of A_2B AR modulators were prominent in CsA-treated animals compared with control animals suggesting CsA treatment may upregulate A_2B ARs. The mRNA expression of A_2B AR was increased after 5 weeks of CsA.

Conclusions:

A_2B AR modulators may provide new therapeutic options to retard CsA nephropathy by mediating renal VEGF and NO.

Methylxanthines and the kidney

This chapter describes the effects of the natural methylxanthines caffeine and theophylline on kidney function. Theophylline in particular was used traditionally to increase urine out put until more potent diuretics became available in the middle of the last century. The mildly diuretic actions of both methylxanthines are mainly the result of inhibition of tubular fluid reabsorption along the renal proximal tubule. Based upon the use of specific adenosine receptor antagonists and the observation of a complete loss of diuresis in mice with targeted deletion of the A1AR gene, transport inhibition by methylxanthines is mediated mainly by antagonism of adenosine A1 receptors (A1AR) in the proximal tubule. Methylxanthines are weak renal vasodilators, and they act as competitive antagonists against adenosine-induced preglomerular vasoconstriction. Caffeine and theophylline stimulate the secretion of renin by inhibition of adenosine receptors and removal of the general inhibitory brake function of endogenous adenosine. Since enhanced intrarenal adenosine levels lead to reduced glomerular filtration rate in several pathological conditions theophylline has been tested for its therapeutic potential in the renal impairment following administration of nephrotoxic substances such as radiocontrast media, cisplatin, calcineurin inhibitors or following ischemia-reperfusion injury. In experimental animals functional improvements have been observed in all of these conditions, but available clinical data in humans are insufficient to affirm a definite therapeutic efficacy of methylxanthines in the prevention of nephrotoxic or postischemic renal injury.

Adenosine receptor antagonism in acute tacrolimus toxicity

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors induce renal vasoconstriction and oliguria during acute toxicity. We previously demonstrated that the non-specific adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow in the setting of acute tacrolimus (TAC) toxicity. This study was undertaken to determine which of the known adenosine receptor subtypes is responsible for the observed effect of theophylline.

METHODS

The GFR was measured by clearance of 51Cr-EDTA in anaesthetized, instrumented Sprague-Dawley rats at three time points: at baseline, 60 min after intravenous administration of TAC (0.05 mg/kg) or vehicle (V) and at 100 min after TAC or V. Either DMSO (n = 5) or one of the three available specific adenosine receptor subtype antagonists 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX, 2 mg/kg, n = 5), a selective A1 receptor antagonist, 8-(3-chlorostyryl) caffeine (CSC, 2 mg/kg, n = 4), a selective A2a receptor antagonist and 3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5 dicarboxylate (MRS1191, 1 mg/kg, n = 5), a selective A3 receptor antagonist, was administered intra-peritoneally prior to the final GFR measurement. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect differences between groups (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Measured GFR declined by 30% from baseline 60 min after TAC. In DMSO treated animals, GFR decreased 51% from baseline at 100 min after TAC, but increased 45% from baseline at 100 min after TAC + MRS1191.

CONCLUSIONS

Only administration of the A3 adenosine antagonist increased GFR following TAC, suggesting that this receptor mediates the effect of theophylline on GFR.

Adenosine A1 receptor antagonists and the kidney

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will examine the most recent evidence that adenosine receptors in the kidney can alter kidney function. Adenosine A(1)-receptors located in the afferent arteriole and proximal tubule can contribute to fluid retaining disorders by mediating tubuloglomerular feedback, afferent arteriole vasoconstriction or direct sodium absorption. In addition, A(1)-receptors may have a role for the prevention or treatment of ischemic injury to the kidney by maintaining afferent arteriole vasodilatation and preserving the glomerular filtration rate.

RECENT FINDINGS

Animal and human studies confirm that adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists are useful adjuvants to the treatment of congestive heart failure by increasing diuresis and natriuresis and preserving the glomerular filtration rate. These agents most likely function to directly inhibit tubular absorption of sodium, as well as inhibit tubuloglomerular feedback. There is increasing evidence that adenosine A(1)-receptors directly affect the release of renin, and that adenosine and angiotensin II act synergistically to increase renal vascular resistance and decrease renal blood flow. The ability of adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists to preserve the glomerular filtration rate and protect the kidney against ischemic damage or drug toxicity is not well established.

SUMMARY

The utility of adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists in the treatment of congestive heart failure should lead to larger clinical trials of these agents. There is increasing evidence that the receptors mediate vasoconstriction that is unique to the renal microcirculation. However, studies of adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists in animal models have largely been unsuccessful in preventing ischemic kidney damage, most likely due to the diversity of factors and events that are involved.

Reversal of acute tacrolimus-induced renal vasoconstriction by theophylline in rats

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether theophylline, a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase inhibitor, reverses the acute declines in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate induced by high-dose tacrolimus in rats.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled experimental study.

SETTING

University-based basic science research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

After mechanical ventilation and instrumentation under isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia, animals received either tacrolimus 0.5 mg/kg intravenously or vehicle and 1 hr later either theophylline 4 mg/kg intravenously or vehicle.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

By using radiolabeled microspheres, renal blood flow was measured in three groups: control (n = 5), tacrolimus plus vehicle (n = 6), and tacrolimus plus theophylline (n = 6) at four time points-baseline and 60, 75, and 90 mins after tacrolimus or vehicle (the latter two time points being 15 and 30 mins after theophylline or vehicle, respectively). Whole blood tacrolimus and serum theophylline concentrations were measured. In a separate group of animals, by using (51)Cr-EDTA, glomerular filtration rate was measured in two groups: tacrolimus plus vehicle (n = 5) and tacrolimus plus theophylline (n = 5) at baseline and over two consecutive 20-min time periods beginning 61 mins posttacrolimus. Urine flow rate also was measured. Following tacrolimus, both renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate declined in parallel by approximately 33% and 50% from baseline after 75 and 90 mins, respectively (p <.05 by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance). Theophylline completely reversed these tacrolimus-induced decreases in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. Urine flow rate also increased in response to theophylline.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose theophylline reverses tacrolimus-induced declines in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate observed in an acute model of tacrolimus toxicity. Theophylline's effect in chronic toxicity remains to be determined.