Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Live-Donor Transplantation with Hyper-Reduced Liver Grafts in Low-Weight Pediatric Recipients

The impact of portal vein reconstruction on portal vein complications after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation with left lobe graft

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether the different methods of portal vein reconstruction have an impact on the occurrence of portal vein complications after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation with left lobe graft.

METHODS

A total of 567 recipients were eligible for enrollment in this study and were divided into the following 2 groups according to the type of portal vein reconstruction: group 1 underwent anastomosis of the left and right bifurcations of the recipient portal vein to the donor portal vein (type 1), whereas group 2 underwent anastomosis of the bevel formed by the main trunk and right branch of the recipient portal vein to the donor portal vein (type 2). Postoperative portal vein complications and recipient and graft survival rates were compared between the 2 groups before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Portal vein complications occurred in 53 (9.3%) patients, including 46 recipients with portal vein stenosis and 7 with portal vein thrombosis. After propensity score matching, the incidence of portal vein stenosis in group 2 was lower than that in group 1 (P = .035). The first diagnosis time of portal vein stenosis in group 2 was later than that in group 1 (P = .033), and the incidence of early portal vein stenosis was lower than that in group 1 (P = .009). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of portal vein thrombosis and recipient and graft survival rates between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 portal vein reconstruction appears to be a viable technique in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation with left lobe graft that can effectively reduce the incidence of portal vein stenosis.

Understanding Local Hemodynamic Changes After Liver Transplant: Different Entities or Simply Different Sides to the Same Coin?

Liver transplantation is an extremely complex procedure performed in an extremely complex patient. With a successful technique and acceptable long-term survival, a new challenge arose: overcoming donor shortage. Thus, living donor liver transplant and other techniques were developed. Aiming for donor safety, many liver transplant units attempted to push the viable limits in terms of size, retrieving smaller and smaller grafts for adult recipients. With these smaller grafts came numerous problems, concepts, and definitions. The spotlight is now aimed at the mirage of hemodynamic changes derived from the recipients prior alterations. This article focuses on the numerous hemodynamic syndromes, their definitions, causes, and management and interconnection with each other. The aim is to aid the physician in their recognition and treatment to improve liver transplantation success.

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT): Short- and long-term outcomes during sixteen years period at a single centre- A retrospective cohort study

Background and objectives

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an effective tool for managing pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) with good long-term graft and patient survival, especially after improvement in peri-operative care, surgical tools and techniques; however, the morbidity and mortality after such a procedure are still a challenging matter. The study aimed to analyze short-and long-term outcomes after pediatric LDLT in a single centre.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 67 pediatric patients who underwent LDLT in the period from April 2003 to July 2018. The overall male/female ratio was 40/27.

Results

Forty-one (61.2%) of patients had ≥1 early and/or late morbidities; the early (less than 3months) and late (≥3months) ones affected 36(53.7%) and 12(17.9%) of them respectively. The 16-year graft and patient survivals were 35(52.2%) while early and late mortalities were 23(34.3%) and 9(13.4%) respectively. Sepsis and chronic rejection were the most frequent causes of early and late mortalities respectively. Moreover, more packed RBCs transfusion units, bacterial infections, and pulmonary complications were independent predictors of poor patient survival.

Conclusions

More packed RBCs transfusion units intra-operatively, and post-liver transplant (LT) bacterial infection, sepsis, chronic rejection, as well as pulmonary complications had a negative insult on our patients' outcomes, so proper management of them is mandatory for improving outcomes after pediatric LDLT.

•

More packed RBCs transfusion units intra-operatively had a negative insult on outcomes after paediatric LDLT.

•

Bacterial infection and pulmonary complications led to poor outcomes after paediatric LDLT.

•

Sepsis and chronic rejection led to post paediatric LDLT poor patient outcomes.

Large for size in pediatrics liver transplant using left lateral segment grafts: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

There are still controversies in using the large left lateral segment in pediatrics LT, with the possibility of the problem of LFS grafts, and the use of monosegmental or reduced liver grafts in small infants. This study aimed to evaluate our experience with LFSG in pediatrics LT.

METHODS

A cohort retrospective analysis was conducted including pediatric recipients who underwent LT between January 2011 and October 2019. We compared recipients with GRWR ≥ 4% (LFS) vs GRWR < 4% as an average for size grafts.

RESULTS

There were 331 pediatric LT, 74 patients with GRWR ≥ 4%, and 257 patients with GRWR < 4%. In the group of LFS grafts, temporary abdominal closure by silicon patch was done in 39 patients (52.7%), 2 patients (2.7%) had postoperative HAT, 3 patients (4.1%) early PVT, 1 patient (1.3%) bile leak, and 3 patients (4.1%) had wound infection, with no significant difference in these complications between the 2 groups. In patients with LFS- grafts, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year patients survival rates were 94.6%, 91.7%, 91.7%, and 91.7%, respectively, while the survival rates in patients of the other group were 96.1%, 92.6%, 91.9%, and 91.9%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = .85).

CONCLUSION

Using LFS graft by left lateral segment in pediatric LT with potential delayed abdominal closure is a safe and feasible option with good outcomes and unnecessary need for graft reduction if performed by an experienced multidisciplinary team.

Pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation with in situ size reduction for recipient-graft size matching

We present a case of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation using a reduced whole liver graft in a 25-month-old boy weighing 12.7 kg. After he had undergone Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia, his general condition deteriorated progressively. He was enrolled on the waiting list for liver transplantation with Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease score of 15. The donor was a 51-monthold boy with body weight of 20 kg. The donor-to-recipient body weight ratio was 158%. The liver graft appeared to be larger than the recipient's abdominal cavity. Thus, we planned to do in situ size reduction. Recipient surgery was performed following standard procedures. We performed graft outflow vein reconstruction using a modified piggyback technique like the double inferior vena cava method. Since the portal vein was hypoplastic, a side-to-side anastomosis technique was used. We also performed intraoperative portogram to embolize venous collaterals. After completing the graft implantation, we found that the liver graft was too large to be accommodated within the abdomen. After in situ resection of the left lateral section parenchyma, we successfully performed primary closure of the abdominal wound. This patient experienced episodes of acute rejection. He has been doing well for four years after the transplantation.

Dextroplantation of a reduced left lateral section graft in an infant undergoing living donor liver transplantation

Graft size matching is essential for successful liver transplantation in infant recipients. We present our technique of graft dextroplantation used in an infant who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a reduced left lateral section (LLS) graft. The patient was an 11-month-old female infant weighing 7.8 kg with hepatoblastoma. She was partially responsive to systemic chemotherapy. Thus, LDLT was performed to treat the tumor. The living donor was a 34-year-old mother of the patient. After non-anatomical size reduction, the weight of the reduced LLS graft was 235 g, with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 3.0%. Recipient hepatectomy was performed according to the standard procedures of pediatric LDLT. At the beginning of graft implantation, the graft was temporarily placed at the abdomen to determine the implantation location. The graft portal vein was anastomosed with an interposed external iliac vein homograft. As the liver graft was not too large and it was partially accommodated in the right subphrenic fossa, thus the abdominal wall wound was primarily closed. The patient recovered uneventfully. An imaging study revealed deep accommodation of the graft within the right subphrenic fossa. The patient has been doing well for six months without any vascular complications. This case suggests that dextroplantation of a reduced LLS graft can be a useful technical option for LDLT in infant patients.

Pediatric liver transplantation with hyperreduced left lateral segment graft

Backgrounds/Aims

To prevent large-for-size graft-related complications in small infant patients, the size of a left lateral segment (LLS) graft can be reduced to be a hyperreduced LLS (HRLLS) graft.

Methods

This study was intended to describe the detailed techniques for harvesting and implanting HRLLS grafts developed in a high-volume liver transplantation (LT) center.

Results

The mean recipient age was 4.0±1.7 months (range: 3-6) and body weight was 5.3±1.4 kg (range: 4.1-6.9). Primary diagnoses of the recipients were progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis in 2 and biliary atresia in 1. The types of LT were living donor LT in 1 and split deceased donor LT in 2. Non-anatomical size reduction was performed to the transected LLS grafts. The mean weight of the HRLLS grafts was 191.7±62.1 g (range: 120-230) and graft-recipient weight ratio was 3.75±1.57% (range: 2.45-5.49). Widening venoplasty was applied to the graft left hepatic vein outflow orifice. Vein homograft interposition was used in a case with portal vein hypoplasia. Types of the abdomen wound closure were one case of primary repair, one of two-staged closure with a mesh, and one of three-staged repair with a silo and a mesh. All three patients recovered uneventfully from the LT operation and are doing well to date for more than 6 years after transplantation.

Conclusions

Making a HRLLS graft through non-anatomical resection during living donor LT and split deceased donor LT can be a useful option for treating small infant patients.

Pediatric split liver transplantation using a hyperreduced left lateral segment graft in an infant weighing 4 kg

We present a case of successful split liver transplantation (LT) using a hyperreduced left lateral segment (LLS) graft in a 106-day-old female infant patient weighing 4 kg. The patient was diagnosed with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Her general condition and liver function deteriorated progressively and she was finally allocated for a split LT under status 1. The deceased donor was a 20-year-old female weighing 63.7 kg. We performed in situ liver splitting and in situ size reduction sequentially. The weight of the hyperreduced LLS graft was 225 g, with a graft-recipient weight ratio of 5.5%. We performed recipient hepatectomy and graft implantation according to the standard procedures for pediatric living-donor LT. Since the graft was too large for primary abdomen closure, the abdominal wall was closed in three stages to make a prosthetic silo, temporary closure with a xenograft sheet, and final primary repair over 2 weeks. The patient has been doing well for more than 6 years after transplantation. In conclusion, split LT using a hyperreduced LLS graft can be a useful option for treating small infants. However, large-for-size graft-related problems, particularly in terms of graft thickness, still remain to be solved.