1
|
Eysenbach G, Hagens S, Kemp J, Roble H, Carter-Langford A, Shen N. Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42507. [PMID: 36763409 PMCID: PMC9960046 DOI: 10.2196/42507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing integration of digital health tools into care may result in a greater flow of personal health information (PHI) between patients and providers. Although privacy legislation governs how entities may collect, use, or share PHI, such legislation has not kept pace with digital health innovations, resulting in a lack of guidance on implementing meaningful consent. Understanding patient perspectives when implementing meaningful consent is critical to ensure that it meets their needs. Consent for research in the context of digital health is limited. OBJECTIVE This state-of-the-art review aimed to understand the current state of research as it relates to patient perspectives on digital health consent. Its objectives were to explore what is known about the patient perspective and experience with digital health consent and provide recommendations on designing and implementing digital health consent based on the findings. METHODS A structured literature search was developed and deployed in 4 electronic databases-MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Web of Science-for articles published after January 2010. The initial literature search was conducted in March 2021 and updated in March 2022. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they discussed electronic consent or consent, focused on the patient perspective or preference, and were related to digital health or digital PHI. Data were extracted using an extraction template and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS In total, 75 articles were included for analysis. Most studies were published within the last 5 years (58/75, 77%) and conducted in a clinical care context (33/75, 44%) and in the United States (48/75, 64%). Most studies aimed to understand participants' willingness to share PHI (25/75, 33%) and participants' perceived usability and comprehension of an electronic consent notice (25/75, 33%). More than half (40/75, 53%) of the studies did not describe the type of consent model used. The broad open consent model was the most explored (11/75, 15%). Of the 75 studies, 68 (91%) found that participants were willing to provide consent; however, their consent behaviors and preferences were context-dependent. Common patient consent requirements included clear and digestible information detailing who can access PHI, for what purpose their PHI will be used, and how privacy will be ensured. CONCLUSIONS There is growing interest in understanding the patient perspective on digital health consent in the context of providing clinical care. There is evidence suggesting that many patients are willing to consent for various purposes, especially when there is greater transparency on how the PHI is used and oversight mechanisms are in place. Providing this transparency is critical for fostering trust in digital health tools and the innovative uses of data to optimize health and system outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jessica Kemp
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Heba Roble
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nelson Shen
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iltis AS, Rolf L, Yaeger L, Goodman MS, DuBois JM. Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:435-461. [PMID: 36644818 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Geographical ancestry has been associated with an increased risk of various genetic conditions. Race and ethnicity often have been used as proxies for geographical ancestry. Despite numerous problems associated with the crude reliance on race and ethnicity as proxies for geographical ancestry, some genetic testing in the clinical, research, and employment settings has been and continues to be race- or ethnicity-based. Race-based or race-targeted genetic testing refers to genetic testing offered only or primarily to people of particular racial or ethnic groups because of presumed differences among groups. One current example is APOL1 testing of Black kidney donors. Race-based genetic testing raises numerous ethical and policy questions. Given the ongoing reliance on the Black race in genetic testing, it is important to understand the views of people who identify as Black or are identified as Black (including African American, Afro-Caribbean, and Hispanic Black) regarding race-based genetic testing that targets Black people because of their race. We conducted a systematic review of studies and reports of stakeholder-engaged projects that examined how people who identify as or are identified as Black perceive genetic testing that specifically presumes genetic differences exist among racial groups or uses race as a surrogate for ancestral genetic variation and targets Black people. Our review identified 14 studies that explicitly studied this question and another 13 that implicitly or tacitly studied this matter. We found four main factors that contribute to a positive attitude toward race-targeted genetic testing (facilitators) and eight main factors that are associated with concerns regarding race-targeted genetic testing (barriers). This review fills an important gap. These findings should inform future genetic research and the policies and practices developed in clinical, research, public health, or other settings regarding genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liz Rolf
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
| | - Lauren Yaeger
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiertz S, Boldt J. Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments. Med Health Care and Philos 2022; 25:269-280. [PMID: 35286521 PMCID: PMC9135890 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10074-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
While Specific Informed Consent has been the established standard for obtaining consent for medical research for many years, it does not appear suitable for large-scale biobank and health data research. Thus, alternative forms of consent have been suggested, based on a variety of ethical background assumptions. This article identifies five main ethical perspectives at stake. Even though Tiered Consent, Dynamic Consent and Meta Consent are designed to the demands of the self-determination perspective as well as the perspective of research as a public good, they are still also criticized from both perspectives. In addition, criticisms based on concerns of justice, participation and democratic deliberation, and relational concerns have been levelled at each of the models. As all of these perspectives have valid points to make, the task at hand lies in balancing these ethical perspectives. What constitutes an adequate balancing depends on contextual factors. These factors include digital infrastructure and digital literacy, data safety regulation, good scientific and clinical practice, transparent debates on ethically relevant features of research, social inequalities, anti-discrimination laws and practices, trust in health care institutions and recognition of patient preferences, and consensus on unethical research. We argue that the role of context in determining acceptable models of consent puts the ethical importance of models of consent into perspective. Since altering contextual factors can help to live up to the ethical concerns at stake in debates about models of consent, opting for such a shift of focus comes without ethical loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Wiertz
- Department of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Boldt
- Department of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ratcliff CL, Wong B, Jensen JD, Kaphingst KA. The Impact of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Responses to Precision Medicine Research. Ann Behav Med 2021; 55:1048-1061. [PMID: 34297059 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision medicine research depends upon recruiting large and diverse participant cohorts to provide genetic, environmental, and lifestyle data. How prospective participants react to information about this research, including depictions of uncertainty, is not well understood. PURPOSE The current study examined public responses to precision medicine research, focusing on reactions toward (a) uncertainty about the scientific impact of sharing data for research, and (b) uncertainty about the privacy, security, or intended uses of participant data. METHODS U.S. adults (N = 674; 51.9% male; 50% non-Hispanic white; Mage = 42.23) participated in an online experimental survey. Participants read a manipulated news article about precision medicine research that conveyed either certainty or uncertainty of each type (scientific, data). Participants then rated their attitudes toward the research, trust in the researchers, and willingness to join a cohort. We tested direct and mediated paths between message condition and outcomes and examined individual characteristics as moderators. RESULTS Overall attitudes were positive and a majority of participants (65%) reported being somewhat or very likely to participate in precision medicine research if invited. Conveying uncertainty of either type had no overall main effect on outcomes. Instead, those who reported perceiving greater uncertainty had lower attitudes, trust, and willingness to join, while those with more tolerance for uncertainty, support for science, and scientific understanding responded favorably to the scientific uncertainty disclosure. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest responses to precision medicine research uncertainty are nuanced and that successful cohort enrollment may be well-supported by a transparent approach to communicating with prospective participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea L Ratcliff
- Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Bob Wong
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jakob D Jensen
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Botkin JR. Informed Consent for Genetic and Genomic Research. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 108:e104. [PMID: 33202103 DOI: 10.1002/cphg.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Genetic research often utilizes or generates information that is potentially sensitive to individuals, families, or communities. For these reasons, genetic research may warrant additional scrutiny from investigators and governmental regulators, compared to other types of biomedical research. The informed consent process should address the range of social and psychological issues that may arise in genetic research. This article addresses a number of these issues, including recruitment of participants, disclosure of results, psychological impact of results, insurance and employment discrimination, community engagement, consent for tissue banking, and intellectual property issues. Points of consideration are offered to assist in the development of protocols and consent processes in light of contemporary debates on a number of these issues. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
This study investigates how patients' privacy concerns about research uses of biospecimen and trust in doctors are associated with their preferences for informed consent and need for control over biospecimens in a biobank. Particularly, this study focuses on the perspectives of Communication Privacy Management theory, precision medicine, and racial health disparities. We recruited 358 women aged 40 and older stratified by race (56% African American and 44% European American). Multivariable linear regression models examined hypothesis and research questions. Individuals' privacy concerns and trust in doctors were significantly associated with their need for control. Although participants' privacy concerns were positively associated with their preference for study-specific model, trust in doctors had no effect on the preference. African American participants needed more control over their sample and were more likely to prefer study-specific model compared to European American participants. Significant interactions by race on the associations between trust and need for control and between privacy concerns and preference for study-specific model were found. These findings suggest that when developing large diverse biobanks for future studies it is important to consider privacy concerns, trust, and need for control with an understanding that there are differences in preferences by race.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jung Hong
- Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bettina Drake
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Melody Goodman
- Department of Biostatistics, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York City, NY
| | - Kimberly A. Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hong SJ, Drake B, Goodman M, Kaphingst KA. Relationships of health information orientation and cancer history on preferences for consent and control over biospecimens in a biobank: A race-stratified analysis. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:479-490. [PMID: 31990114 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we investigated how patients' self-reported health information efficacy, relationship with health providers, and cancer history are associated with their preferences for informed consent and need for control over biobank biospecimens. We recruited 358 women aged 40 and older (56% African American; 44% European American) and analyzed the data using multivariable regression models. Results show that African American participants' health information efficacy was significantly and negatively associated with their need for control over biospecimens and preference for a study-specific model. European American participants' dependency on doctors was a significant and negative predictor of their preference for a study-specific model. Several significant interaction effects, which varied across races, were found with regard to health information efficacy, personal cancer history, need for control, and preference for a study-specific model. The study findings suggest it is important to consider health information efficacy, relationship with providers, and need for control when developing large diverse biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jung Hong
- Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bettina Drake
- Division of Public Health Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Melody Goodman
- Department of Biostatistics, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rothwell E, Botkin JR, Cheek-O'Donnell S, Wong B, Case GA, Johnson E, Matheson T, Wilson A, Robinson NR, Rawlings J, Horejsi B, Lopez AM, Byington CL. An empirical assessment of the short-term impacts of a reading of Deborah Zoe Laufer's drama Informed Consent on attitudes and intentions to participate in genetic research. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2018; 9:69-76. [PMID: 29513089 PMCID: PMC6092928 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1449771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the short-term impact of the play "Informed Consent" by Deborah Zoe Laufer (a fictionalized look at the controversy over specimens collected from the Havasupai Tribe for diabetes research in 1989) on perceptions of trust, willingness to donate biospecimens, and attitudes toward harm and privacy among the medical and undergraduate students, faculty, and the public in the Intermountain West. METHODS Surveys were administered before and after a staged reading of the play by professional actors. Survey items included the short form Trust in Medical Researchers, and single-item questions about group identity, ethics of genetic testing in children, and willingness to donate biospecimens. In addition, respondents were given the option to answer open-ended questions through e-mail. RESULTS Out of the 481 who attended the play, 421 completed both the pre and post surveys, and 166 participants completed open-ended questions online approximately 1 week after the play. Across all participants, there were significant declines for trust in medical researchers and for the survey item "is it ethical for investigators to test children for adult onset diseases" (p < .001 for both) following the play. There was a significant increase in agreement to improve group identity protections (p < .001) and there were no differences on willingness to donate biospecimens to research (p = .777). Qualitative data provided extensive contextual data supporting these perspectives. DISCUSSION This is one of the first studies to document short-term impacts of a theatrical performance on both attitudes and behavioral intentions toward research ethics and clinical research participation. Future research should continue to explore the impact of theatrical performances among public and investigators on the ethical issues and complexities in clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Bob Wong
- a University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | | | - Erin Johnson
- a University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | | | - Alena Wilson
- a University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Warner TD, Weil CJ, Andry C, Degenholtz HB, Parker L, Carithers LJ, Feige M, Wendler D, Pentz RD. Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:115-124. [PMID: 29390947 PMCID: PMC5869128 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617751204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Commentators are concerned that broad consent may not provide biospecimen donors with sufficient information regarding possible future research uses of their tissue. We surveyed with interviews 302 cancer patients who had recently provided broad consent at four diverse academic medical centers. The majority of donors believed that the consent form provided them with sufficient information regarding future possible uses of their biospecimens. Donors expressed very positive views regarding tissue donation in general and endorsed the use of their biospecimens in future research across a wide range of contexts. Concerns regarding future uses were limited to for-profit research and research by investigators in other countries. These results support the use of broad consent to store and use biological samples in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Latarsha J. Carithers
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (USA)
- Now at the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (USA)
| | - Michelle Feige
- Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, Inc. (USA)
| | | | - Rebecca D. Pentz
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine (USA)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Although the importance of including vulnerable populations in medical research is widely accepted, identifying how to achieve such inclusion remains a challenge. Ensuring that the language of informed consent is comprehensible to this group is no less of a challenge. Although a variety of interventions show promise for increasing the comprehensibility of informed consent and increasing a climate of exchange, consensus is lacking on which interventions should be used in which situations and current regulations provide little guidance. We argue that the notion of individual autonomy — a foundational principle of informed consent — may be too narrow for some vulnerable populations by virtue of its failure to acknowledge their unique histories and current circumstances. It has a different meaning for members of structured groups like American Indians than for unstructured groups, such as African Americans, whose complicated histories foster group identity. Ensuring broad participation in research and selecting appropriate methods for obtaining informed consent — namely, methods aligned with the source of vulnerability and level of risk — require new ways of thinking that might produce guidelines for matching informed consent models and processes with subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Gehlert
- Sarah Gehlert, Ph.D., is the E. Desmond Lee Professor of Racial and Ethnic Diversity at Washington University in St. Louis. She holds an M.A. in Anthropology and an M.S.W. from the University of Missouri-Columbia and a Ph.D. in Social Work from Washington University (St. Louis). Jessica Mozersky, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at Washington University in St. Louis. She holds an M.B.E. from the University of Pennsylvania and a Ph.D. in Anthropology from University College London's Interdisciplinary Institute for Human Genetics and Health
| | - Jessica Mozersky
- Sarah Gehlert, Ph.D., is the E. Desmond Lee Professor of Racial and Ethnic Diversity at Washington University in St. Louis. She holds an M.A. in Anthropology and an M.S.W. from the University of Missouri-Columbia and a Ph.D. in Social Work from Washington University (St. Louis). Jessica Mozersky, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at Washington University in St. Louis. She holds an M.B.E. from the University of Pennsylvania and a Ph.D. in Anthropology from University College London's Interdisciplinary Institute for Human Genetics and Health
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Drake BF, Brown KM, Gehlert S, Wolf LE, Seo J, Perkins H, Goodman MS, Kaphingst KA. Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process. J Cancer Educ 2017; 32:836-844. [PMID: 27037699 PMCID: PMC5047847 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1029-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The US Department of Health and Human Services addresses clear communication in the informed consent process as part of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for revisions to the Common Rule. However, prior research has shown that participants may not fully comprehend research studies despite completion of an informed consent process. Our main goal was to provide plain language information about donation processes to a cancer biobank to supplement an informed consent form. We developed and conducted cognitive testing with supplemental brochures that clearly communicated information about three different models for consent (notice, broad and study-specific) to future use of biospecimens. During the brochure development process, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured, individual, in-person cognitive interviews among 14 women to examine participants' perceptions of the brochures. Each participant provided feedback regarding the understandability, graphics and layout, and cultural appropriateness of the brochures. Our findings demonstrate that these methods may be used to tailor consent form brochures, such as the ones developed here, to other populations. This study therefore adds to our understanding of how best to present content to help women from two different racial groups make informed decisions about participation in a cancer biobank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina F Drake
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Katherine M Brown
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Sarah Gehlert
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Leslie E Wolf
- Center for Law Health and Society, Georgia State University College of Law, 85 Park Place NE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | - Joann Seo
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Hannah Perkins
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-0491, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Condit CM, Shen L, Edwards KL, Bowen DJ, Korngiebel DM, Johnson CO. Participants' Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles. J Health Commun 2016; 21:16-24. [PMID: 27653592 PMCID: PMC7868084 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1193914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The rise of large cohort-based health research that includes genetic components has increased the communication challenges for researchers. Controversies have been amplified over requirements for re-consent, return of results, and privacy protections, among other issues. This study extended research on the impact that the perceived role of "research participant" might have on communication expectations to illuminate research participants' preferences for re-consent. The study employed an online survey of participants in a long-standing cancer genetics registry. Results confirmed previous exploratory findings that research participants endorse multiple mental models of participant roles in research (doctor-patient, collaborator, donor, legal contract, etc.). Regression analyses indicated that high and low salience of different models of the role of research participant are related to different communication expectations. However, the pattern of relationships among roles is relevant. The results of the regression analysis also indicated that preference for mandatory re-consent and its relationship to mental models of roles are related to attitudes of trust, benefits, and informational risks. The discussion identifies implications as including the use of explicit approaches to address role relationships in communication with research participants. It also points to implications for methodological approaches in mental model research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste M Condit
- a Department of Communication Studies , University of Georgia , Athens , Georgia , USA
| | - Lijiang Shen
- b Department of Communication Arts and Sciences , Pennsylvania State University , University Park , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Karen L Edwards
- c Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine , University of California, Irvine , Irvine , California , USA
| | - Deborah J Bowen
- d Department of Bioethics and Humanities , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Diane M Korngiebel
- e Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Catherine O Johnson
- c Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine , University of California, Irvine , Irvine , California , USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rothwell E, Wong B, Anderson RA, Botkin JR. The Influence of Education on Public Trust and Consent Preferences With Residual Newborn Screening Dried Blood spots. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2016; 11:231-6. [PMID: 27387457 PMCID: PMC4990497 DOI: 10.1177/1556264616656976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of educational interventions during prenatal care on public trust for newborn screening and consent preferences for the retention and use of leftover newborn screening dried blood spots. Women who were 30 to 36 weeks pregnant were recruited, and outcomes were measured by telephone survey 2 to 4 weeks postpartum (n = 901). Approximately 40% of the sample chose the opt-out approach but those who watched educational interventions delivered during prenatal care were significantly associated with higher levels of trust and support for an opt-out consent approach. Providing education during prenatal care about newborn screening and the storage and use of leftover dried blood spots along with brochure-based education provided in the hospital when the baby is born is associated with improved trust for the program and support for research with the leftover blood spots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bob Wong
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|