Flecainide: electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic properties in refractory ventricular tachycardia

Flecainide How and When: A Practical Guide in Supraventricular Arrhythmias

Transcatheter ablation was increasingly and successfully used to treat symptomatic drug refractory patients affected by supraventricular arrhythmias. Antiarrhythmic drug treatment still plays a major role in patient management, alone or combined with non-pharmacological therapies. Flecainide is an IC antiarrhythmic drug approved in 1984 from the Food and Drug Administration for the suppression of sustained ventricular tachycardia and later for acute cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and for sinus rhythm maintenance. Currently, flecainide is mostly used for sinus rhythm maintenance in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients without structural cardiomyopathy although recent studies enrolling different patient populations have demonstrated a good effectiveness and safety profile. How should we interpret the results of the CAST after the latest evidence? Is it possible to expand the indications of flecainide, and therefore, its use? This review aims to highlight the main characteristics of flecainide, as well as its optimal clinical use, delineating drug indications and contraindications and appropriate monitoring, based on the most recent evidence.

Flecainide-induced Increase in QRS Duration and Proarrhythmia during Exercise

In patients taking flecainide, exercise-induced arrhythmias are believed to be related to QRS widening at rest and during exercise. Our aim was to determine, retrospectively, predictive factors of flecainide-induced (a) QRS widening at rest and during exercise, and (b) proarrhythmia (PA) during exercise. Flecainide was administered to 119 patients for atrial and/or ventricular arrhythmias who performed a maximal treadmill test. A total of 63 patients had a normal heart (defined by the absence of structural heart disease and an ejection fraction ≥ 55% by echocardiography and/or cardiac catheterisation), 26 had coronaropathy, 18 valvulopathy and 3 had both, and 7 had dilated and 2 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The mean dosage of flecainide was 190 or 200 ± 10 mg/day. Previous myocardial infarction (MI) was a predictive variable of flecainide-induced QRS widening at rest (p = 0.04). During exercise, the risk factors of QRS widening were previous MI (p = 0.008), angina without previous MI (p = 0.009), structural heart disease (p = 0.001) and a bundle branch block at rest (p = 0.01). PA on exercise occurred in 7 patients. Structural heart disease (p = 0.04) and an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [p = 0.02] were predictive variables of PA. All patients with left ventricular dysfunction and PA had a QRS widening with flecainide at rest ≥ 25%. The risk factors of QRS widening at rest and during exercise with flecainide were distinct from those of PA on exercise. In patients with an impaired LVEF, a flecainide-induced QRS widening of 25% at rest was the threshold value beyond which there was a high risk of PA during exercise. This study was retrospective and not a double-blind trial, therefore the results need to be corroborated in a prospectively designed trial.

Refractory dispersion promotes conduction disturbance and arrhythmias in a Scn5a (+/-) mouse model

Accentuated right ventricular (RV) gradients in action potential duration (APD) have been implicated in the arrhythmogenicity observed in Brugada syndrome in studies assuming that ventricular effective refractory periods (VERPs) vary in concert with APDs. The present experiments use a genetically modified mouse model to explore spatial heterogeneities in VERP that in turn might affect conduction velocity, thereby causing arrhythmias. Activation latencies, APDs and VERPs recorded during programmed S1S2 protocols were compared in RV and left ventricular (LV) epicardia and endocardia of Langendorff-perfused wild-type (WT) and Scn5a^+/− hearts. Scn5a^+/− and WT hearts showed similar patterns of shorter VERPs in RV than LV epicardia, and in epicardia than endocardia. However, Scn5a^+/− hearts showed longer VERPs, despite shorter APD₉₀s, than WT in all regions examined. The pro- and anti-arrhythmic agents flecainide and quinidine increased regional VERPs despite respectively decreasing and increasing the corresponding APD₉₀s particularly in Scn5a^+/− RV epicardia. In contrast, Scn5a^+/− hearts showed greater VERP gradients between neighbouring regions, particularly RV transmural gradients, than WT (9.1 ± 1.1 vs. 5.7 ± 0.5 ms, p < 0.05, n = 12). Flecainide increased (to 21 ± 0.9 ms, p < 0.05, n = 6) but quinidine decreased (to 4.5 ± 0.5 ms, p < 0.05, n = 6) these gradients, particularly across the Scn5a^+/− RV. Finally, Scn5a^+/− hearts showed greater conduction slowing than WT following S2 stimuli, particularly with flecainide administration. Rather than arrhythmogenesis resulting from increased transmural repolarization gradients in an early, phase 2, reentrant excitation mechanism, the present findings implicate RV VERP gradients in potential reentrant mechanisms involving impulse conduction slowed by partial refractoriness.

Twenty-five years in the making: flecainide is safe and effective for the management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practise and its prevalence is increasing. Over the last 25 years, flecainide has been used extensively worldwide, and its capacity to reduce AF symptoms and provide long-term restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) has been well documented. The increased mortality seen in patients treated with flecainide in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) study, published in 1991, still deters many clinicians from using flecainide, denying many new AF patients a valuable treatment option. There is now a body of evidence that clearly demonstrates that flecainide has a favourable safety profile in AF patients without significant left ventricular disease or coronary heart disease. As a result of this evidence, flecainide is now recommended as one of the first-line treatment options for restoring and maintaining SR in patients with AF under current treatment guidelines. The objective of this article is to review the literature pertaining to the pharmacological characteristics, safety and efficacy of flecainide, and to place this drug in the context of current therapeutic management strategies for AF.

hERG-related drug toxicity and models for predicting hERG liability and QT prolongation

BACKGROUND

hERG K(+) channels have been recognized as a primary antitarget in safety pharmacology. Their blockade, caused by several drugs with different therapeutic indications, may lead to QT prolongation and, eventually, to potentially fatal arrhythmia, namely torsade de pointes. Therefore, a number of preclinical models have been developed to predict hERG liability early in the drug development process.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to outline the present state of the art on drug-induced hERG blockade, providing insights on the predictive value of in vitro and in silico models for hERG liability.

METHODS

On the basis of latest reports, high-throughput preclinical models have been discussed outlining advantages and limitations.

CONCLUSION

Although no single model has an absolute value, an integrated risk assessment is recommended to predict the pro-arrhythmic risk of a given drug. This prediction requires expertise from different areas and should encompass emerging issues such as interference with hERG trafficking and QT shortening.

The hERG K+ channel: target and antitarget strategies in drug development

The human ether-à-go-go related gene (hERG) K+ channel is of great interest for both basic researchers and clinicians because its blockade by drugs can lead to QT prolongation, which is a risk factor for torsades de pointes, a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia. A growing list of agents with "QT liability" have been withdrawn from the market or restricted in their use, whereas others did not even receive regulatory approval for this reason. Thus, hERG K+ channels have become a primary antitarget (i.e. an unwanted target) in drug development because their blockade causes potentially serious side effects. On the other hand, the recent identification and functional characterization of hERG K+ channels not only in the heart, but also in several other tissues (e.g. neurons, smooth muscle and cancer cells) may have far reaching implications for drug development for a possible exploitation of hERG as a target, especially in oncology and cardiology.

QT prolongation through hERG K+ channel blockade: Current knowledge and strategies for the early prediction during drug development

Prolongation of the QT interval of the electrocardiogram is a typical effect of Class III antiarrhythmic drugs, achieved through blockade of potassium channels. In the past decade, evidence has accrued that several classes of drugs used for non-cardiovascular indications may prolong the QT interval with the same mechanism (namely, human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) K(+) channel blockade). The great interest in QT prolongation is because of several reasons. First, drug-induced QT prolongation increases the likelihood of a polymorphous ventricular arrhythmia (namely, torsades de pointes, TdP), which may cause syncope and degenerate into ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. Second, the fact that several classes of drugs, such as antihistamines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and neuroleptics may cause the long QT syndrome (LQTS) raises the question whether this is a class effect (e.g., shared by all agents of a given pharmacological class) or a specific effect of single agents within a class. There is now consensus that, in most cases, only a few agents within a therapeutic class share the ability to significantly affect hERG K(+) channels. These compounds should be identified as early as possible during drug development. Third, QT prolongation and interaction with hERG K(+) channels have become surrogate markers of cardiotoxicity and have received increasing regulatory attention. This review briefly outlines the mechanisms leading to QT prolongation and the different strategies that can be followed to predict this unwanted effect. In particular, it will focus on the approaches recently proposed for the in silico screening of new compounds.

Safety of non-antiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the QT interval or induce torsade de pointes: an overview

The long and growing list of non-antiarrhythmic drugs associated with prolongation of the QT interval of the electrocardiogram has generated concern not only for regulatory interventions leading to drug withdrawal, but also for the unjustified view that QT prolongation is usually an intrinsic effect of a whole therapeutic class [e.g. histamine H(1) receptor antagonists (antihistamines)], whereas, in many cases, it is displayed only by some compounds within a given class of non-antiarrhythmic drugs because of an effect on cardiac repolarisation. We provide an overview of the different classes of non-antiarrhythmic drugs reported to prolong the QT interval (e.g. antihistamines, antipsychotics, antidepressants and macrolides) and discusses the clinical relevance of the QT prolonging effect. Drug-induced torsade de pointes are sometimes considered idiosyncratic, totally unpredictable adverse drug reactions, whereas a number of risk factors for their occurrence is now recognised. Widespread knowledge of these risk factors and implementation of a comprehensive list of QT prolonging drugs becomes an important issue. Risk factors include congenital long QT syndrome, clinically significant bradycardia or heart disease, electrolyte imbalance (especially hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia), impaired hepatic/renal function, concomitant treatment with other drugs with known potential for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions (e.g. azole antifungals, macrolide antibacterials and class I or III antiarrhythmic agents). This review provides insight into the strategies that should be followed during a drug development program when a drug is suspected to affect the QT interval. The factors limiting the predictive value of preclinical and clinical studies are also outlined. The sensitivity of preclinical tests (i.e. their ability to label as positive those drugs with a real risk of inducing QT pronglation in humans) is sufficiently good, but their specificity (i.e. their ability to label as negative those drugs carrying no risk) is not well established. Verapamil is a notable example of a false positive: it blocks human ether-a-go-go-related (HERG) K(+) channels, but is reported to have little potential to trigger torsade de pointes. Although inhibition of HERG K(+) channels has been proposed as a primary test for screening purposes, it is important to remember that several ion currents are involved in the generation of the cardiac potential and that metabolites must be specifically tested in this in vitro test. At the present state of knowledge, no preclinical model has an absolute predictive value or can be considered as a gold standard. Therefore, the use of several models facilitates decision making and is recommended by most experts in the field.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for ventricular arrhythmias: current perspectives

Pharmacologic therapy for ventricular arrhythmias has undergone a remarkable change recently. Recognition of the importance of underlying structural heart disease on prognostic implications of ventricular arrhythmias has resulted in the refinement of the clinical classification of these arrhythmias. With refinement of techniques of risk stratification, it is now possible to identify patients ventricular arrhythmias at high risk for sudden death. Retrospective analyses of prior antiarrhythmic drug trials and new data from prospective randomized trials are now available and can more directly define the risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy. Prevention of sudden death, reduction in total mortality, or improvement in symptoms remain the only benefits of antiarrhythmic drugs. With inclusion of total mortality as the major endpoint for assessment of pharmacologic interventions in high-risk patients, the potential for excess mortality due to antiarrhythmic agents is now recognized. The pharmacologic diversity of newly released antiarrhythmic agents and others under development has resulted in a re-evaluation of the traditional classification of these drugs. Multiple ongoing clinical trials will define the risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy and other nonpharmacologic interventions in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Determinants and mechanisms of flecainide-induced promotion of ventricular tachycardia in anesthetized dogs

BACKGROUND

Class IC antiarrhythmic agents such as flecainide are known to have potentially significant ventricular proarrhythmic actions, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. While some studies have reported proarrhythmia in both healthy dogs and dogs that previously have had a myocardial infarction (MI), there are no published, controlled studies comparing proarrhythmia in healthy dogs vs in dogs with MI. In addition, the concentration dependence of proarrhythmia is unknown and the electrophysiological changes associated with proarrhythmia are not well established.

METHODS

We administered successive loading and maintenance infusions of flecainide until ventricular tachyarrhythmia or death occurred in 13 healthy dogs and 19 dogs with 72-hour-old MIs (MI dogs). Ventricular proarrhythmia, defined as reproducible ventricular tachycardia absent under control conditions and occurring in the presence of flecainide, was observed in 4 of 13 healthy dogs (31%) and 15 of 19 MI dogs (79%, P = .02), and drug-induced spontaneous ventricular tachycardia occurred in 8 of 19 MI dogs but in no healthy dogs (P = .007). Activation data at the time of proarrhythmia were available for 11 MI dogs and provided evidence for reentry in 9, with a complete epicardial reentry circuit identified in 4 dogs and a partial circuit in 5. While flecainide slowed ventricular conduction in both the longitudinal and transverse directions, there were no significant differences between overall drug-induced conduction changes in MI dogs compared with healthy dogs. However, in 7 MI dogs for whom activation data were available during ventricular pacing at concentrations comparable to those causing proarrhythmia, flecainide induced a new arc of block in 6 of 7, whereas an arc of block was never observed in the absence of proarrhythmia. Conduction block was induced transverse to fiber orientation in a rate-dependent fashion and was caused by a regionally-specific effect of the drug. No differences were noted between refractory periods proximal and distal to the site of block.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior MI strongly predisposes dogs to flecainide proarrhythmia, which occurs in the majority of such dogs in a concentration-related way. In most cases, activation data suggest that anisotropic reentry around a localized arc of rate-dependent transverse conduction block underlies proarrhythmia. These results provide insights into the conditions and mechanisms underlying the ability of flecainide to promote the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia.

Flecainide

Flecainide is a Class IC antiarrhythmic agent whose primary electrophysiologic effect is a slowing of conduction in a wide range of cardiac tissues. It is well absorbed and effective in suppressing isolated premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or nonsustained ventricular arrhythmia but has only a modest efficacy when electrophysiologic testing is used as an endpoint. Its adverse effect on mortality in the CAST trial suggested a propensity to proarrhythmia--a phenomenon to which the Class IC agents appear particularly prone. Despite the applicability of the CAST study only to patients with a prior myocardial infarction, there has been a shift away from flecainide in ventricular arrhythmia, but the low noncardiac side effect profile of the agent allows for its continued use in a wide variety of supraventricular arrhythmias.

Malignant arrhythmias and acute myocardial ischemia: interaction between flecainide and the autonomic nervous system

The antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic effects of flecainide were assessed in 21 anesthetized cats. Ventricular arrhythmias can be reproducibly induced in cats by the combination of acute myocardial ischemia and sympathetic stimulation. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), sustained (sVT) and nonsustained (nsVT) ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF) may be induced by a 1-minute left stellate ganglion stimulation during a 3-minute coronary artery occlusion. After three trials yielding consistent results, flecainide (2 mg/kg intravenous bolus plus 2 mg.kg-1.hr-1 intravenous infusion) was injected and two additional trials performed. Eight cats also underwent two trials after propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) administered while flecainide infusion was maintained. Flecainide decreased heart rate and blood pressure and slightly prolonged JTc (9%, p < 0.05). It markedly augmented QRS duration (61%, p < 0.0001), which was increased by an additional 61% (p < 0.0001) during sympathetic stimulation. VF was observed in 8 animals and never after flecainide (p < 0.05). However, after drug administration all cats had VT (2 nsVT and 6 sVT), and 5 required cardiac massage. Flecainide did not prevent the occurrence of nsVT in 6 cats, and it worsened arrhythmias by inducing VT (4 nsVT and 2 sVT) in 6 cats with only PVCs or without arrhythmias in the control trials. Propranolol, administered while flecainide infusion was maintained, prevented the increase in heart rate and the marked QRS prolongation during sympathetic stimulation (4 +/- 3 vs 52 +/- 16 msec, p < 0.05) and abolished the proarrhythmic effect of flecainide in 4 of 5 animals. Thus flecainide, despite an antifibrillatory effect, does not prevent and actually may favor the occurrence of sVT during acute myocardial ischemia and enhanced sympathetic activity. Propranolol, by countering the increase in heart rate during sympathetic stimulation, prevented the rate-dependent conduction delay and abolished the proarrhythmic effect of flecainide. The exacerbation, whenever a transient ischemic episode is accompanied by elevated sympathetic activity, of the ischemia-induced conduction delay caused by flecainide may in part explain the mortality data in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

Safety and efficacy of oral sotalol for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents

The safety and efficacy of oral sotalol were evaluated in 481 patients with drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) in an open-label multicenter study. After drug-free baseline evaluations, therapy was initiated at 80 mg every 12 hours, with upward dose titrations of 160 mg/day being allowed at intervals of 72 hours to a maximum dose of 480 mg every 12 hours. Efficacy determinations were made by either programmed electrical stimulation (PES) or Holter monitoring responses. Of the 481 patients enrolled, 473 underwent acute-phase titration. Of the 269 patients assessable by PES, 94 (34.9%) exhibited complete response (suppression of inducible VT), with an additional 67 patients (24.9%) exhibiting partial response. Of the 109 patients assessable by Holter monitoring, 43 (39.4%) exhibited a complete response. There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders with regard to left ventricular ejection fraction. Although response rates tended to improve as the sotalol dose was increased to 640 mg/day, efficacy was most commonly achieved at a sotalol dose of 320 mg/day. Sotalol was discontinued because of adverse effects in 42 (8.9%) of the acute-phase patients. The most common adverse effect was proarrhythmia, which was observed in 23 patients (4.9%). Proarrhythmia took the form of torsades de pointes in 12 patients and an increase in VT episodes in 11. In 3 acute-phase patients (0.6%), sotalol was discontinued because of the emergence of congestive heart failure. A total of 286 patients entered the long-term phase. Life-table estimates of the proportion of patients who remained free of recurrence of arrhythmia at 12, 18, and 27 months were 0.76, 0.72, and 0.66, respectively. There were no significant differences in time to recurrence of arrhythmia as related to PES response, Holter monitor response, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, or history of congestive heart failure. Among the 70 patients (24.5%) in whom there was recurrence of arrhythmia, sudden death occurred in 17 and sustained VT in 41. Sotalol was discontinued owing to presumed adverse effects in 21 (7.3%) of the long-term patients, including 8 with proarrhythmia; proarrhythmia consisted of torsades de pointes in 3 patients and increased episodes of VT in 5. These findings suggest that sotalol is an effective drug for the long-term treatment of patients with drug-refractory sustained VT. Proarrhythmia was observed in only 6.4% of the study population and tended to occur during the acute titration phase. The need to discontinue therapy because of congestive heart failure was uncommon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efficacy of class 1C antiarrhythmic agents in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia refractory to therapy with class 1A antiarrhythmic drugs

The efficacy of class 1C antiarrhythmic agents was determined in 36 patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during baseline electrophysiology study (EPS), who continued to have inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during EPS on class 1A antiarrhythmic therapy. Of 12 patients who partially responded to class 1A drugs, 11 (91.7%) continued to have a partial response during EPS on class 1C therapy, whereas one patient did not respond. Of 24 nonresponders to class 1A therapy, 2 (8.3%) responded during EPS on class 1C therapy, 7 (29.2%) partially responded, and 15 (62.5%) did not respond. In the 24 nonresponders to class 1A therapy, 9 of 17 patients (53%) with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) > or = 30% responded or partially responded to class 1C therapy, compared with none of 7 patients with EF < 30% (P < .05). The EPS on class 1C agents in patients who fail to respond to class 1A therapy may be warranted only in those with EF > or = 30%.

Reproducibility of the model of induced ventricular tachycardia in conscious dogs with infarction

The canine model of ventricular tachycardias (VT) induced by programmed stimulation is used routinely in several laboratories to test antiarrhythmic drugs. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of success and reproducibility of this model. We analyzed a group of 58 dogs that underwent a 2-hr occlusion and were submitted to programmed electrical stimulation at least 4 days after the surgery. Only 29 dogs (50%) were inducible and included in the study, as 22 dogs died following myocardial infarction, and seven dogs were never inducible. Out of 130 trials, 92 (70%) performed on inducible dogs were positive with 11% of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias, 63% of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias, and 26% of ventricular fibrillation. Inducibility decreased over time in a subgroup of 19 dogs that was submitted to four trials during the first month after the infarction (68% of inducible dogs versus 46% in trials 1 and 4, respectively). Ventricular effective refractory period decreased significantly from 146 +/- 7 msec at trial 1 to 114 +/- 6 msec at trial 4, and the severity of the induced ventricular tachycardias increased. This variability should be considered when planning studies on antiarrhythmic drugs in this model.

Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular ectopy after a myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of sudden death, patients in whom ventricular ectopy could be suppressed with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine were randomly assigned to receive either active drug or placebo. The use of encainide and flecainide was discontinued because of excess mortality. We examined the mortality and morbidity after randomization to encainide or flecainide or their respective placebo.

RESULTS

Of 1498 patients, 857 were assigned to receive encainide or its placebo (432 to active drug and 425 to placebo) and 641 were assigned to receive flecainide or its placebo (323 to active drug and 318 to placebo). After a mean follow-up of 10 months, 89 patients had died: 59 of arrhythmia (43 receiving drug vs. 16 receiving placebo; P = 0.0004), 22 of nonarrhythmic cardiac causes (17 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo; P = 0.01), and 8 of noncardiac causes (3 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo). Almost all cardiac deaths not due to arrhythmia were attributed to acute myocardial infarction with shock (11 patients receiving drug and 3 receiving placebo) or to chronic congestive heart failure (4 receiving drug and 2 receiving placebo). There were no differences between the patients receiving active drug and those receiving placebo in the incidence of nonlethal disqualifying ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, syncope, need for a permanent pacemaker, congestive heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, angina, or need for coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an excess of deaths due to arrhythmia and deaths due to shock after acute recurrent myocardial infarction in patients treated with encainide or flecainide. Nonlethal events, however, were equally distributed between the active-drug and placebo groups. The mechanisms underlying the excess mortality during treatment with encainide or flecainide remain unknown.

Flecainide acetate dose-concentration relationship in cardiac arrhythmias: influence of heart failure and amiodarone

The trough concentration-dose (C/D) ratio of flecainide was prospectively studied in 78 patients with various cardiac arrhythmias. After the removal of two outlier values, no influence of body weight on C/D ratio was evidenced. Coadministration of amiodarone, and, moreover, the presence of heart failure increase the C/D ratio, from 2.01 +/- 0.78 to 2.55 +/- 0.37 and 2.9 +/- 1.19 ng/ml/mg, respectively (p less than 0.001 by two-factor analysis of variance). The presence of both heart failure and amiodarone therapy increases the C/D ratio to 3.88 +/- 1.07 ng/ml/mg. A single loading oral dose (30 mg/kg) of amiodarone increased C/D measured at the sixth hour in nine patients from 2.27 +/- 0.50 to 2.57 +/- 0.73 ng/ml/mg (p less than 0.05). The trough C/D ratio increased more during chronic treatment from 2.03 +/- 0.86 to 2.92 +/- 1.32 ng/ml/mg (p less than 0.05). Thus, a dosage reduction of flecainide (of 50% in some cases) is mandatory, in case of heart failure or the combination with amiodarone therapy, to obtain a plasma level of the drug that is similar to those observed in patients with a normal heart and without amiodarone therapy. The flecainide-amiodarone interaction seems time dependent.

Class IC drugs: propafenone and flecainide

Recently published clinical data on the efficacy and side-effect profiles of flecainide and propafenone are reviewed. Both compounds appear to be clinically effective for the control of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias, both ventricular as well as supraventricular. These include termination of atrial fibrillation, control of junctional tachycardias, and control of ventricular arrhythmias. While the incidence of noncardiac side effects appeared to be similar for both compounds, proarrhythmic effects appeared to be higher on flecainide than on propafenone, especially with doses higher than 400 mg.

Safety and efficacy of sotalol in patients with drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The safety and efficacy of oral sotalol, an investigational beta-adrenergic blocker with class III antiarrhythmic drug properties, were examined in a multicenter study in 236 patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In 104 patients, the index arrhythmia was a cardiac arrest, and all patients had undergone at least 3 previous unsuccessful antiarrhythmic trials (mean = 5 per patient). In the 106 patients assessed by programmed electrical stimulation, sotalol completely suppressed induction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 33 (31%) and rendered VT slower (greater than 100 ms prolongation of cycle length) or more difficult to induce in 29 (27%). Using continuous 24-hour ambulatory monitoring methods, sotalol complete- and partial-response rates were 51 and 12%, respectively. Of the 236 acute-phase patients, 151 were discharged receiving long-term sotalol therapy. The median sotalol dose was 480 mg/day. At a mean follow-up of 346 +/- 92 days, 27 patients (18%) had recurrence of sustained arrhythmia; 9, sudden death; 11, sustained VT; 5, automatic defibrillator discharge; and 2, syncope. Adverse effects forced discontinuation of therapy in 10 patients (7%): 6 secondary to symptomatic bradyarrhythmia, 2 due to refractory heart failure, 1 due to torsades de pointes, and 1 from bronchospasm. Life-table analysis of sotalol's overall long-term efficacy at 6, 12 and 18 months were 80, 76 and 72%, respectively. Although mean follow-up was short (less than 1 year), neither acute-phase programmed stimulation nor 24-hour ambulatory monitoring responses were significantly predictive of subsequent arrhythmic outcome. Proarrhythmia was documented in 18 patients (7%), 17 during the acute phase and 1 during long-term follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of flecainide on defibrillation thresholds in the anesthetized dog

The effects of flecainide on defibrillation thresholds in 21 open chest, anesthetized dogs were studied. Defibrillation was accomplished using nontruncated exponential pulses delivered through two epicardial patches. Multiple shocks of varying energy were administered after 10 s of ventricular fibrillation in random order. The percent success was plotted against the energy delivered for each dog. A sigmoidal curve was fit to the data and the energy associated with 50% success (E50) calculated. Flecainide (n = 16) or saline solution (n = 5) was then infused and E50 again determined. Flecainide infusion produced mean (+/- standard error of the mean) plasma levels of 610 +/- 111 ng/ml. Defibrillation thresholds were obtainable in 10 of 16 dogs that received flecainide infusion. Flecainide infusion increased E50 by 75% (from 6.5 +/- 1.9 to 11.4 +/- 2.6 J) (P less than 0.05). Infusion of saline solution did not significantly affect defibrillation energy. Of 16 dogs that received flecainide infusion, 12 had one or more complications: 6 had ventricular fibrillation resistant to defibrillation, 6 developed severe hypotension after successful defibrillation and 5 had spontaneous ventricular fibrillation after successful defibrillation. These effects were not seen in any control dogs. Flecainide infusion significantly increases defibrillation threshold and has important adverse arrhythmic and hemodynamic effects in this experimental preparation.

Flecainide acetate for resistant arrhythmias in the young: efficacy and pharmacokinetics

Drug efficacy and pharmacokinetics were assessed in 63 patients, aged 5 days to 30 years (mean 8 years), who received flecainide acetate for control of resistant arrhythmias. Doses of flecainide ranged from 59 to 225 mg/m2 body surface area per day (mean 141) in divided doses every 8 to 12 h and serum trough levels ranged from 0.10 to 0.99 micrograms/ml (mean 0.36). Flecainide controlled or partially controlled arrhythmia in 53 (84%) of the 63 patients: 7 of 7 patients who had the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia, 12 of 13 who had an atrial ectopic tachycardia, 10 of 10 who had ventricular tachycardia and 18 of 25 patients who had reentrant supraventricular tachycardia. Five of seven patients who had the latter arrhythmia were unsuccessfully treated with flecainide. They had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and developed asymptomatic, incessant, slower orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia while receiving the drug. Transient blurred vision was reported in three patients and two patients had transient hyperactivity. No significant hemodynamic side effects were seen in any patient. Twenty-five patients underwent oral pharmacokinetic investigation. Young infants (less than 1 year of age) had a mean plasma elimination half-life (t 1/2) approximating that (11 to 12 h) found in older children and healthy adults; children aged 1 to 12 years had a shorter mean t 1/2 of 8 h. Dosing schedules based on milligrams per square meter body surface area correlated better with plasma flecainide levels than did dosing based on milligrams per kilogram body weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Direct and autonomically mediated effects of oral flecainide

This study was undertaken to determine if oral flecainide exerts autonomically mediated actions in addition to its direct depressant effect. Electrophysiologic studies were performed twice in each of 15 patients (mean age 59 years) with normal resting and intrinsic heart rate and normal A-H interval. In the first study, the variables of sinus node and atrioventricular node were evaluated both in the basal state and after autonomic blockade (propranolol 0.2 and atropine 0.04 mg/kg). Oral flecainide was administered for 4 to 5 days (200 to 250 mg daily) and the study was then repeated using the same methods. From comparison of data obtained in the 2 studies in the basal state, the overall effect of flecainide was evaluated and by comparing those obtained after autonomic blockade, the direct action of the drug was assessed. The overall effect of flecainide on sinus node was slight; sinus cycle length, corrected sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time did not change significantly after the drug. In contrast, after autonomic blockade the variables of sinosal automaticity were increased significantly (p less than 0.01). Flecainide significantly prolonged the atrioventricular node variables both in the basal state and after autonomic blockade (p less than 0.01), but the degree of increase was more marked after autonomic blockade (p less than 0.05). These data show dual effects of oral flecainide: a direct depressant action and an autonomically mediated opposing action, likely of vagolytic type.

Clinical electrophysiologic effects of flecainide acetate

Flecainide acetate depresses the rate of depolarization of action potential (Vmax), the so-called "membrane stabilizing action." In the intact heart it has a unique profile of substantial effect on conduction with modest effect on refractoriness. After intravenous administration, clinical electrophysiologic studies show that conduction through atrial myocardium, atrioventricular (AV) node, His-Purkinje system, and ventricular myocardium is depressed, the most prominent effect being on the His-Purkinje system. Refractorines of the normal atrial and AV nodal myocardium is not prolonged while that of the ventricular muscle is slightly increased. Atrial fibrillation (60% to 70%), atrial tachycardia (90% to 100%), and nodal and AV tachycardia (80% to 90%) are generally terminated, while flutter is usually slowed, but in a small proportion of patients (10% to 20%) might be terminated by the intravenous use of flecainide acetate. This drug has also been shown to be effective in terminating stable ventricular tachycardia (70%). However, it appears to be slightly less effective in suppressing inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias. Administered orally, flecainide is very effective in decreasing ventricular ectopic activity (80% to 95%) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Thus, flecainide has a wide range of antiarrhythmic properties, making it a useful agent in the management of a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. In a small proportion of patients, however, its use can lead to apparent arrhythmogenic effects, the most dangerous being exacerbation of ventricular tachycardia.

Clinical and electrophysiologic effects of flecainide in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia

The electrophysiologic effects and antiarrhythmic efficacy of flecainide were evaluated by electrophysiologic study (EPS) in 20 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to an average 2.9 drugs. In 19 patients EPSs were performed with patients not receiving antiarrhythmic medications and receiving oral flecainide therapy at steady state (mean dose, 235 +/- 67 mg/day). Flecainide significantly increased the QRS complex duration (27%, P less than .001), PR interval (17%, P less than .001), and right ventricular effective refractory periods 8.5% and 21.1% (P less than .01) for the first and second extrastimuli, respectively. During baseline EPS, 17 patients were induced into VT and two were noninducible. Flecainide prevented EPS-induced VT in five patients and the induced VT became slow and hemodynamically stable in three. Two patients who failed flecainide monotherapy were induced into slow hemodynamically stable VT with flecainide in combination with amiodarone. The two noninducible patients, during baseline EPS, had suppression of spontaneous VT with flecainide. Overall, 13 of 20 patients received flecainide either alone or in combination with amiodarone for chronic therapy. Side effects encountered during the study consisted of blurred vision, dizziness, weakness, lethargy, nausea, worsened heart failure and bradyarrhythmias. After a mean 9-month follow-up (3 to 16 months) nine patients remain on flecainide therapy. There were three recurrences of slow, hemodynamically stable VT and no episodes of sudden death. Low-dose flecainide, either alone or in combination with other agents, is effective therapy for certain patients with refractory VT but heart failure remains a significant concern in patients with depressed left ventricular function.

Long-term efficacy of mexiletine alone and in combination with class Ia antiarrhythmic drugs for refractory ventricular arrhythmias

The efficacy of mexiletine used alone, and in combination with a class Ia antiarrhythmic drug, was assessed in 159 previously drug-refractory patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) during serial electrophysiologic studies and during long-term (5-year) clinical follow-up. Electrically-inducible ventricular tachycardia was suppressed by mexiletine alone in 23% of patients tested, and a combined antiarrhythmic drug regimen was effective in 29% of the trials performed. Mexiletine was much more likely to be effective in patients presenting with nonsustained VT or ventricular fibrillation than in patients with sustained VT (p less than 0.005). After 1 and 4 years of treatment, 18% and 42% of the patients treated with mexiletine alone had died suddenly or suffered recurrent symptomatic VT, compared to 11% and 25% of patients treated with the combined antiarrhythmic drug regimens (p = NS). Mexiletine therapy was associated with frequent, though readily reversible, adverse reactions. However, mexiletine treatment had to be discontinued permanently in 8 of 92 patients (9%) because of intolerable side effects. We conclude that the added efficacy and possible improved arrhythmia-free survival associated with combining mexiletine with a class Ia agent should be further investigated.

Refractory symptomatic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in elderly patients

The problem of refractory life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in elderly patients has not been previously studied. To determine if clinical, anatomic, or electrophysiologic variables and prognosis are significantly different in elderly subjects, 49 elderly (68 to 84 years) and 44 younger (44 to 53 years) survivors of refractory symptomatic ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation secondary to coronary artery disease were studied. Elderly patients displayed more extensive anatomic coronary artery disease, with 80 percent having three-vessel disease in comparison with 30 percent of the younger patients (p less than 0.001). Prior myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiomegaly were more common in the elderly group (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.001, and p less than 0.034, respectively), whereas angina was more common in the younger group (p less than 0.001). In 55 percent of the elderly patients and 58 percent of the younger patients, electrophysiologic testing demonstrated inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia that required treatment with an investigative antiarrhythmic drug and/or cardiac surgery, including implantation of an automatic defibrillator. Elderly patients tolerated aggressive evaluation as well as did younger patients, and despite the difference in clinical and anatomic findings, long-term survival curves were similar, although the probability of survival at 20 months was 62 percent in the elderly and 80 percent in the younger patients. This difference in early survival is explained by eight surgical deaths in the elderly group, compared with two in the younger group.

Chronic flecainide therapy selected by electrophysiology testing of intravenous flecainide

The utility of flecainide acetate was evaluated in 93 patients by means of electrophysiologic studies before and after intravenous flecainide administration to determine long-term efficacy. Twenty patients had a prior history of at least one cardiac arrest and 73 patients had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). The mean radionuclear ejection fraction was 32 +/- 5%. Flecainide was evaluated in 93 patients, with 44 patients no longer having VT following flecainide (47% efficacy). Procainamide was evaluated in 69 patients; 24 patients had an adverse reaction to reaction to procainamide and 28 of the 69 patients were protected on procainamide (40% efficacy). The mean serum concentration of flecainide achieved in the protected group was 298 +/- 36 ng/ml and 4.3 micrograms/ml for procainamide. Both flecainide and procainamide significantly prolonged refractoriness, lengthened QRS duration, while only procainamide increased the QT interval. All 93 patients were discharged on antiarrhythmic therapy, 42 on flecainide, 27 on other antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing, and 24 on amiodarone (when all other agents failed). Six of the 42 patients on flecainide complained of adverse side effects, but none were severe enough to warrant stopping therapy. Of the 42 patients on flecainide, four (9%) died suddenly over 18 +/- 4 months. Twenty-seven patients were on other therapy; eight of these have died, three suddenly (11%), four with myocardial infarctions, and one due to congestive heart failure. Twenty-four patients started amiodarone; 11 have died, five (21%) suddenly, four of congestive heart failure, one of pulmonary fibrosis, and one with myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical types of proarrhythmic response to antiarrhythmic drugs

The problem of drug-induced or drug-aggravated cardiac arrhythmias has been recognized for many years. Digitalis glycosides and class I, II, III, or IV antiarrhythmic drugs can cause severe sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block. Digitalis can cause a variety of supraventricular arrhythmias; atrial tachycardia with block and nonparoxysmal atrioventricular junctional tachycardia are the most characteristic. Recognition that class IA and class III antiarrhythmic drugs can aggravate arrhythmias or cause new arrhythmias in patients being treated for potentially malignant or malignant ventricular arrhythmias has intensified the interest in proarrhythmia in recent years. Several characteristic types of proarrhythmic response have been described. Torsades de pointes (multiform) ventricular tachycardia (VT) accompanied by prolongation of the QT interval can be caused by class IA and class III antiarrhythmic drugs as well as other drugs that bind to the membrane sodium channels of ventricular cells, for example, tricyclic antidepressants. Uniform VT in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias and poor left ventricular function is a characteristic proarrhythmic response to class IC antiarrhythmic drugs. Bidirectional VT or accelerated idioventricular rhythm are characteristic of digitalis toxicity. More difficult to establish as proarrhythmic responses are increased frequency of ventricular premature depolarizations and increased ease of inducing VT with programmed ventricular stimulation.

Effect of flecainide acetate on prevention of electrical induction of ventricular tachycardia and occurrence of ischemic ventricular fibrillation during the early postmyocardial infarction period: evaluation in a conscious canine model of sudden death

The antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory effects of flecainide acetate during the early postinfarction period were evaluated in a conscious canine model of sudden cardiac death. Ventricular tachycardia remained inducible early after infarction in eight of nine dogs receiving an intravenous loading dose of flecainide (2.0 mg/kg body weight) and seven of eight dogs receiving saline vehicle. In both the drug and vehicle groups, there was no significant change in the ventricular refractory period or in the cycle length of the induced ventricular tachycardia. With a maintenance intravenous infusion of flecainide, 1.0 mg/kg per h for 4 hours, the subsequent occurrence of acute posterolateral ischemia resulted in the development of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death in seven of eight flecainide-treated and eight of eight vehicle-treated dogs. Seven additional postinfarction dogs with noninducible tachycardia during pretreatment programmed stimulation, and thereby considered to be at "low risk" for the development of ischemic ventricular fibrillation, were also given flecainide in an intravenous loading and maintenance dosing regimen. The subsequent occurrence of posterolateral ischemia resulted in the development of ventricular fibrillation in three of these seven dogs. These findings suggest that flecainide acetate may not possess pharmacologic properties useful in managing ventricular tachycardia or in preventing ischemic ventricular fibrillation in the presence of recent myocardial damage.

Effects of flecainide on the cellular electrophysiology of neonatal and adult cardiac fibers

The acute cellular electrophysiologic actions of flecainide acetate on isolated neonatal and adult canine ventricular myocardium and Purkinje fibers were evaluated with standard microelectrode techniques. Flecainide, 0.1 to 10.0 micrograms/ml, produced concentration-dependent decreases in action potential amplitude, overshoot, and phase O Vmax of adult ventricular myocardium and Purkinje fibers. The greatest effects were on Vmax. Neonatal action potential characteristics were affected to a lesser degree by flecainide. Flecainide had disparate effects on myocardial and Purkinje fiber repolarization and refractoriness. In adult ventricular myocardium, action potential duration (APD) and effective refractory period (ERP) increased progressively with drug concentration. APD and ERP were increased to a lesser degree in neonatal myocardium. In adult Purkinje fibers, APD decreased progressively with increasing flecainide concentrations. ERP decreased at 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml, but returned to control values at 10.0 micrograms/ml. APD and ERP of neonatal Purkinje fibers responded to a lesser degree. At faster stimulation frequencies (2 to 4 Hz), flecainide produced significant frequency-dependent decreases in Vmax in adult Purkinje fibers. Such use-dependency was not evident in neonatal fibers. These data indicate a significantly lower sensitivity of immature cardiac tissues to the electrophysiologic effects of flecainide.

Flecainide: a new antiarrhythmic agent

PVCs (trigger mechanisms) and the vulnerability of the myocardium to sustain a life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (substrate) are two variables in the sudden death equation. Physicians treating patients at risk for sudden death should consider PVC frequency and vulnerability as interrelated variables. Risk assessment must take into consideration both variables. Antiarrhythmic drug efficacy can be assessed in terms of a reduction in trigger mechanisms (PVCs) as well as decreasing myocardial vulnerability (induction of VT at PES). Flecainide acetate, at a reduced dosage of 100 mg twice daily, is effective in both aspects, markedly decreasing PVC frequency and preventing VT induction at PES testing. Holter monitoring and electrophysiologic testing evaluate different aspects of the problem. With the addition of an agent as potent as flecainide, which is devoid of many of the bothersome side effects previously limiting antiarrhythmic therapy, an agent is now available that may be useful to treat both the trigger mechanism and the substrate in sudden death. We must be careful not to worsen the situation through the profound effects of flecainide on depolarization and refractoriness that in some patients cause life-threatening arrhythmias to be more frequent.

Flecainide: steady state electrophysiologic effects in patients with remote myocardial infarction and inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmia

The effect of flecainide in 24 patients with inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmia and a history of remote myocardial infarction was determined. Flecainide was administered in oral doses individually adjusted to suppress all spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and 80% of ventricular premature complexes on 24 hour ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiography. Antiarrhythmic therapy, as assessed by Holter monitoring, was adequate in 20 (83%) of the study patients at a mean dose of 144 +/- 28 mg every 12 hours; the mean plasma flecainide level was 583 +/- 329 ng/ml. In 18 patients, the mean sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time and atrial, atrioventricular nodal and ventricular refractory periods were unchanged. The AH interval increased by 15 +/- 15%, the HV interval by 35 +/- 32% and the QRS duration by 24 +/- 21%. Toxicity or failure to suppress ventricular premature complexes and ventricular tachycardia by Holter monitoring precluded electrophysiologic study with flecainide in four patients; two patients refused electrophysiologic study with flecainide for nonmedical reasons. Ventricular tachycardia was not inducible in 4 (22%) of 18 patients receiving flecainide. Sustained arrhythmia remained inducible in 14 patients (78%) despite evidence of antiarrhythmic efficacy on Holter monitoring, but the rate of the induced ventricular tachycardia was slower and symptoms were alleviated during ventricular tachycardia in 10 (56%) of 18 patients. The 4 patients who had no inducible ventricular tachycardia with flecainide, and the 10 patients who had inducible ventricular tachycardia with a longer cycle length and alleviation of their symptoms, have been followed up as outpatients for 16 +/- 7 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of intravenous and oral flecainide on ventricular tachycardia

The effect of flecainide acetate, a class 1c antiarrhythmic agent, was examined in 15 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Intravenous flecainide was administered in a dose of 2 mg/kg at the time of intracardiac stimulation and recording studies. Oral flecainide was given to 10/15 patients and retesting was undertaken using an indwelling electrode. Intravenous flecainide terminated sustained stable tachycardia in 8/11 patients and prevented reinitiation of tachycardia in 5/10 patients. Oral therapy prevented induction of tachycardias in only 2/10 patients. Five patients had non-sustained tachycardia and three had slower sustained tachycardia. "New" non-clinical tachycardias could be induced in six patients after flecainide but five of these had had more than one type of induced tachycardia. Four of 10 patients remained free of tachycardias during follow-up. Withdrawal of oral treatment was necessary in three patients, one of whom had severe proarrhythmic effects. Two patients required additional antiarrhythmic therapy. Long-term suppression could not be predicted from the results of oral therapy, but testing after intravenous drug seemed to be a more useful prognostic indicator. In summary, intravenous flecainide is effective for slowing and termination of stable ventricular tachycardia. Oral therapy is also effective but caution should be exerted in patients with multimorphic tachycardias.