Random sampling by glitter drop method

Insights about brain tumors gained through immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of nuclear and phenotypic markers

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has provided major insights about the classification of brain tumors by identifying cellular markers of phenotype and about tumor growth potential with nuclear markers of proliferation. In situ hybridization (ISH) research shows promise for diagnostic applications in tumor classification. The avidin-biotin conjugate IHC procedure is highlighted for diagnostic use on routinely processed clinical specimens. The immunophenotypes of brain tumors are tabulated in reference to their common IHC markers. Tumors that have been correctly classified by their IHC phenotypes include the giant-cell glioblastoma, primary brain lymphoma, and central neurocytoma. Phenotypes that may be more definitively detected by ISH, such as pituitary hormone, immunoglobulin light chain, and collagen messages are described. IHC of nuclear proliferation markers correlates with grade of malignancy, predicts tumor growth potential, and is prognostic for patient survival. The incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine, the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and the expression of Ki-67 antigen detected by MIB-1 antibody are compared in regard to their cell cycle activity and labeling index determinations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of brain tumor interphase nuclei and chromosomes is described. Abnormal FISH signals of specific chromosomes are associated with different types of brain tumors, with different grades of malignancy, and with mesenchymal drift of glioma cells in culture.

Products of cells from gliomas: IX. Evidence that two fundamentally different mechanisms change extracellular matrix expression by gliomas

Four human astrocytic gliomas of high grade of malignancy were each evaluated in tissue and in vitro for percentages of cells expressing glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), collagen type IV, laminin and fibronectin assessed by immunofluorescence with counterstaining of nuclear DNA. Percentages of cells with reticulin and cells binding fluorescein-labeled Ulex europaeus agglutinin were also assessed. In tissue, each extracellular matrix (ECM) component was associated with cells in the walls of abnormal proliferations of glioma vessels, and all four tumors had the same staining pattern. Two strikingly different patterns of conversion of gene product expression emerged during in vitro cultivation. (1). In the most common pattern, percentages of all six markers consistently shifted toward the exact phenotype of mesenchymal cells in abnormal vascular proliferations: increased reticulin, collagen type IV, laminin and fibronectin; markedly decreased glial marker GFAP and absent endothelial marker Ulex europaeus agglutinin. The simplest explanation of this constellation of changes coordinated toward expression of vascular ECM markers is that primary glioma cell cultures are overgrown by mesenchymal cells from the abnormal vascular proliferations of the original glioma. These cell cultures were tested for in situ hybridization (ISH) signals of chromosomes 7 and 10. Cells from one glioma had diploid signals. Cells from the other glioma had aneuploid signals indicating they were neoplastic; however, their signals reflected different numerical chromosomal aberrations than those common to neoplastic glia. (2). The second pattern was different. Cells with ISH chromosomal signals of neoplastic glia retained GFAP, and gained collagen type IV. Their laminin and fibronectin diminished, but persisted among a lower percentage of cells. Cloning and double immunofluorescence confirmed the presence of individual cells with glial and mesenchymal markers. A cell expressing GFAP in addition to either fibronectin, reticulin or collagen type IV is not a known constituent of glioblastoma tissue. This provides evidence of a second mechanism of conversion of gene expression in gliomas.

The application of 5-bromodeoxyuridine in the management of CNS tumors

A variety of clinical reports have described the application of the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index as an adjunct to conventional pathological examination of CNS tumors. This index has proven useful in predicting the clinical outcome associated with many such tumors. Furthermore, because of its efficacy as a radiosensitizing agent, bromodeoxyuridine (and the closely related iododeoxyuridine) has been used in combination with radiation therapy for malignant glial neoplasms, with some encouraging results. Although most studies suggest that bromodeoxyuridine is safe, there is evidence that this compound does have potential side-effects, including the observation that it is a mutagen and carcinogen in some experimental systems. A number of new alternative approaches for predicting the clinical outcome of CNS tumors has been developed based on an increased understanding of their molecular biology. However, until such approaches are better characterized, the clinical application of bromodeoxyuridine will continue to play an important role in predicting the clinical behavior of many CNS tumors.