Allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation without protective isolation in adults with malignant disease

Home-Based Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States

Patients undergoing allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) require extensive hospitalizations or daily clinic visits for the duration of their transplantation. Home HCT, wherein patients live at home and providers make daily trips to the patient's residence to perform assessments and deliver any necessary interventions, may enhance patient quality of life and improve outcomes. We conducted the first study of home HCT in the United States to evaluate this model in the US healthcare setting and to determine the effect on clinical outcomes and quality of life. This case-control study evaluated patients who received home HCT at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, from November 2012 to March 2018. Each home HCT patient was matched with 2 controls from the same institution who had received standard treatment based on age, disease, and type of transplant for outcomes comparison. Clinical outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records, and quality of life was assessed via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant. Clinical outcomes were compared with Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test (continuous variables) or chi-square test (categorical variables). Quality of life scores were compared using the Student t-test. All analyses used a significance threshold of 0.05. Twenty-five patients received home HCT, including 8 allos and 17 autos. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the home HCT patients and their matched controls; home HCT patients had decreased incidence of relapse within 1 year of transplantation. Pre-HCT quality of life was well preserved for autologous home HCT patients. This Phase I study demonstrated that home HCT can be successfully implemented in the United States. There was no evidence that home HCT outcomes were inferior to standard-of-care treatment, and patients undergoing autologous home HCT were able to maintain their quality of life. A Phase II randomized trial of home versus standard HCT is currently underway to better compare outcomes and costs.

Long-term outcome in patients treated at home during the pancytopenic phase after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were given the option to be treated at home during the pancytopenic phase. Daily visits by a nurse and phone calls from a physician from the unit were part of the protocol. During almost two decades, 252 patients with haematological malignancies and non-malignant disorders were included. Median age was 47 (range 0-72) years. Myeloablative conditioning was given to 102 patients and reduced intensity to 150. Donors were matched unrelated (n = 160), HLA-identical siblings (n = 71), or HLA-mismatched (n = 21). Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 35% and that of chronic GVHD was 46%. Non-relapse mortality was 14% 10 years after HSCT. In patients with haematological malignancies (n = 229), the 10-year probability of relapse was 34%. No patients died at home. Overall survival was 59% and relapse-free survival was 50% after 10 years. We conclude that patients treated at home after HSCT have an encouraging long-term outcome.

Patients' experiences of different care settings and a new life situation after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Over the past 20 years, considerable healthcare resources have shifted from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. To be in an outpatient setting or at home after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been shown to be medically safe and beneficial to the patient. In this study we describe patients' experiences of different care settings (hospital or home) and a new life situation during the acute post-transplant phase after HSCT. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 patients (six women and nine men) 29-120 days after HSCT. An inductive qualitative content analysis was performed to analyse the data. The analysis resulted in four categories: To be in a safe place, To have a supportive network, My way of taking control, and My uncertain return to normality. The findings showed that patients undergoing HSCT felt medically safe regardless of the care setting. The importance of a supportive network (i.e. the healthcare team, family and friends) was evident for all patients. Both emotional and problem-focused strategies were used to cope with an uncertain future. Being at home had some positive advantages, including freedom, having the potential for more physical activity, and being with family members. The study highlights some key areas thought to provide more personalised care after HSCT.

Family members' life situation and experiences of different caring organisations during allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells transplantation-A qualitative study

The aim of this study was to describe family members' life situation and experiences of care in two different care settings, the patient's home or in hospital during the acute post-transplantation phase after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 14 family members (seven women and seven men). An inductive qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the data. The majority of the family members' (n = 10) had experiences from home care. The findings show the family members' voice of the uncertainty in different ways, related with the unknown prognosis of the HSCT, presented as Being me being us in an uncertain time. The data are classified into; To meet a caring organisation, To be in different care settings, To be a family member and To have a caring relationship. Positive experiences such as freedom and security from home care were identified. The competence and support from the healthcare professionals was profound. Different strategies such as adjusting, having hope and live in the present used to balance to live in an uncertain time. The healthcare professionals need to identify psychosocial problems, and integrate the psychosocial support for the family to alleviate or decrease anxiety during HSCT, regardless of the care setting.

Protective Isolation in Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplants: A Review of the Literature and Single Institution Experience

Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, is a pediatric bone marrow transplant center. This center has both laminar flow and HEPA- (high-efficiency particulate air-)filtered rooms for children under-going allogeneic and autologous transplantation. HEPA-filtered rooms on negative pressure are used to nurse oncology children with infectious diseases. Over the winter months of 2001, there was an increased demand for single rooms for children with infectious diseases. Over the same period, a number of transplants were planned. Consequently, to guide practice decisions, a review of the literature and a survey of nursing practice in Australian and North American pediatric oncology units were undertaken. Findings showed that protective isolation measures such as positive-pressure single rooms, low microbial diets, and strict hand washing should be used only for children requiring allogeneic transplants. Use of other isolation measures were found to be of no added value for transplantation. As autologous transplants are increasingly performed in outpatient clinics, these children should not require the same level of protective isolation.

General health, symptom occurrence, and self-efficacy in adult survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a cross-sectional comparison between hospital care and home care

PURPOSE

Earlier studies have shown that home care during the neutropenic phase after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is medically safe, with positive outcomes. However, there have been few results on long-term outcomes after home care. The aims of this study were to compare general health, symptom occurrence, and self-efficacy in adult survivors who received either home care or hospital care during the early neutropenic phase after allo-HSCT and to investigate whether demographic or medical variables were associated with general health or symptom occurrence in this patient population.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional survey, 117 patients (hospital care: n = 78; home care: n = 39) rated their general health (SF-36), symptom occurrence (SFID-SCT, HADS), and self-efficacy (GSE) at a median of 5 (1-11) years post-HSCT.

RESULTS

No differences were found regarding general health, symptom occurrence, or self-efficacy between groups. The majority of patients in both hospital care (77 %) and home care (78 %) rated their general health as "good" with a median of 14 (0-36) current symptoms. Symptoms of fatigue and sexual problems were among the most common. Poor general health was associated with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), low self-efficacy, and cord blood stem cells. A high symptom occurrence was associated with female gender, acute GVHD, and low self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

No long-term differences in general health and symptom occurrence were observed between home care and hospital care. Thus, home care is an alternative treatment method for patients who for various reasons prefer this treatment option. We therefore encourage other centers to offer home care to patients.

Many days at home during neutropenia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation correlates with low incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease

Patients are isolated in the hospital during the neutropenic phase after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We challenged this by allowing patients to be treated at home. A nurse from the unit visited and checked the patient. One hundred forty-six patients treated at home were compared with matched hospital control subjects. Oral intake was intensified from September 2006 and improved (P = .002). We compared 4 groups: home care and control subjects before and after September 2006. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of grades II to IV was 15% in the "old" home care group, which was significantly lower than that of 32% to 44% in the other groups (P < .03). Transplantation-related mortality, chronic GVHD, and relapse were similar in the groups. The "new" home care patients spent fewer days at home (P = .002). In multivariate analysis, GVHD of grades 0 to I was associated with home care (hazard ratio [HR], 2.46; P = .02) and with days spent at home (HR, .92; P = .005) but not with oral nutrition (HR, .98; P = .13). Five-year survival was 61% in the home care group as compared with 49% in the control subjects (P = .07). Home care is safe. Home care and many days spent at home were correlated with a low risk of acute GVHD.

Infection prevention measures used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: evidences for practice

This integrative review aimed to identify and assess evidence available about the use of high-efficiency air filters, protective isolation and masks for infection prevention in patients submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during hospitalization. LILACS, PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were used to select the articles. Of the 1023 identified publications, 15 were sampled. The use of HEPA filters is recommended for patients submitted to allogeneic transplantation during the neutropenia period. The level of evidence of protective isolation is weak (VI) and the studies evaluated did not recommend its use. No studies with strong evidence (I and II) were evaluated that justify the use of masks, while Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations should be followed regarding the use of special respirators by immunocompromised patients. The evidenced data can support decision making with a view to nursing care.

Safe early discharge for patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with or without stem cell transplantation: a prospective analysis of clinical variables predictive for complications after treatment

AIM

To identify which patient groups can be safely discharged early after high dose chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the standard of care for patients with haematological malignancies who have been treated with high dose chemotherapy has been to hospitalise them until neutrophil recovery and clinical improvement. Over the past years, a more liberal approach has resulted in a tendency to discharge patients earlier. However, currently it is unclear which clinical variables are important and which patient groups are most suitable to be discharged early.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study group of 55 patients underwent 82 admission periods for a total of 2269 patient days, which could be classified into four categories: induction treatment, consolidation treatment and autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Different clinical variables potentially interfering with early discharge were subsequently analysed for their association with each treatment group.

RESULTS

The median duration of admission was 27 days. The incidence of fever (82.9%) and use of intravenous antibiotics (79.3%) was high in all treatment groups. The only statistically significant differences between groups were found for performance status and mucositis. In the patient group undergoing consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia, the performance status was better and mucositis was less severe. The decline in performance status and the severity of mucositis were as expected most obvious 10-14 days after the start of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing consolidation chemotherapy appear to be the most suitable candidates for early discharge, especially in the first-week postchemotherapy treatment. Early discharge can also be considered in patients with a good performance status in the autologous stem cell transplantation group, directly after transplantation.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

An important factor in developing an early discharge programme is a good infrastructure, both at home and in the hospital.

Performing allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic SCT in the outpatient setting: effects on infectious complications and early transplant outcomes

This retrospective single-center study compared the incidence, spectrum and effect of infections in 1045 consecutive allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) performed between 1995 and 2006 in the inpatient (IP) or outpatient (OP) setting. We analyzed 374 allo-HSCT (196 IP and 178 OP) and 671 auto-HSCT (163 IP and 508 OP). The incidence of infection was lower both in auto-OP (25% OP vs 33% IP, P=0.042) and allo-OP cohorts (42.7% OP vs 55.6% IP, P=0.012). The mean number of infections per transplant was lower in both auto-OP (0.39 OP vs 0.57 IP, P=0.05) and in allo-OP cohorts (0.78 OP vs 1.09 IP, P=0.018). The 100-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) for OP auto-HSCT was 4.72% and for IP 3.95% (P=0.68). The 100-day NRM for OP allo-HSCT was lower at 14.1% than it was for IP at 22.6% (P=0.041). Time to onset of first infection and spectrum of infections was similar in all groups. We conclude that performing allo- and auto-HSCT in the OP setting results in short-term outcomes, including infections complications that are comparable to the standard IP setting.

Variation in supportive care practices in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is an elective procedure that results in prolonged immune suppression and high treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Transplant centers and physicians use a variety of prophylaxis and monitoring strategies to prevent or minimize complications. Little is known about the variability in these practices. We conducted an international Internet-based survey of 526 physicians to describe the spectrum of supportive care practices employed. Consistency in pretransplant cardiac (96%) and pulmonary (95%) screening, informed consent documentation (93%), and use of antifungal prophylaxis (92%) was observed. Greater heterogeneity was seen in use of myelogenous growth factors, empiric antibiotic therapy, protective isolation procedures, posttransplant monitoring, and environmental and social restrictions. Although some practice differences were associated with physician characteristics and transplant type, most practice variation remained unexplained. These results suggest a need for well-designed observational and interventional studies to provide data about which supportive care practices improve outcomes. For practices proved to be beneficial, publication of guidelines and incorporation of monitoring into quality improvement initiatives may help standardize practices.

Case-control comparison of at-home and hospital care for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: the role of oral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was reduced using home care compared with hospital care after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS

Between March 1998 and December 2006, 601 patients underwent ASCT at our unit. Requirements for at-home ASCT were fulfilled by 76 patients. A control group of 76 patients treated in the hospital were matched for age, sex, diagnosis, stage of disease, conditioning, stem-cell source, type of donor, and immunosuppression. Oral nutrition was determined as median kcal/kg/day for the first 21 days after ASCT.

RESULTS

The home-care patients received more oral nutrition per day than hospital controls (P<0.05). Number of days at home correlated with oral nutrition (P=0.004). In multivariate analysis, acute GVHD of grades II to IV was associated with poor oral nutrition (P=0.003) and hospital care (P=0.06). Transplant-related mortality was associated with acute GVHD grades II to IV (P<0.0001) and bacteremia (P=0.004). In addition to acute GVHD and bacteremia, death was associated with absence of chronic GVHD (P=0.012). Five-year survival was 65% in patients treated at home, when compared with 47% in the controls (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Better oral nutrition may be one reason for the reduced probability of acute GVHD and better survival with at-home care than with hospital care.

Hospital and community acquired infection and the built environment--design and testing of infection control rooms

Negative-pressure isolation rooms are required to house patients infected with agents transmissible by the aerosol route in order to minimise exposure of healthcare workers and other patients. Housing patients in a separate room provides a barrier which minimises any physical contact with other patients. An isolation room held at negative pressure to reduce aerosol escape and a high air-change rate to allow rapid removal of aerosols can eliminate transmission of infectious aerosols to those outside the room. However, badly designed and/or incorrectly operating isolation rooms have been shown to place healthcare workers and other patients at risk from airborne diseases such as tuberculosis. Few standards are available for the design of isolation rooms and no pressure differential or air-change rates are specified. Techniques such as aerosol particle tracer sampling and computational fluid dynamics can be applied to study the performance of negative-pressure rooms and to assess how design variables can affect their performance. This should allow cost-effective designs for isolation rooms to be developed. Healthcare staff should be trained to understand how these rooms operate and there should be systems in place to ensure they are functioning correctly.

Long-term follow-up of patients treated at home during the pancytopenic phase after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

To prevent neutropenic infections, patients are kept in isolation rooms after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients living within one hours' driving distance from our unit were given the opportunity of treatment at home after ASCT during the pancytopenic phase. We compared 36 patients treated at home during March 1998 until December 2000, with 54 controls treated in the hospital during September 1995 and September 2001. The incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was lower in the home care group compared to the controls, that is, 17 vs 44% (P < 0.01). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 52% in the home care group, compared to 57% in the controls. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 13% in the home care patients vs 44% in the controls (P = 0.002). The probability of relapse was similar in the two groups. The 4-year survival was 63% in the home care patients compared to 44% in the controls (P = 0.04). Home care after ASCT is a novel approach that resulted in less TRM, similar incidence of chronic GVHD and relapse, and improved long-term survival compared to controls treated in the hospital.

Isolation in the allogeneic transplant environment: how protective is it?

Aggressive infection control measures that include isolating patients within protective hospital environments have become a standard practice during allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A wide range of interventions includes the management of ventilation systems, BMT unit construction and cleaning, isolation and barrier precautions, interactions with health-care workers and visitors, skin and oral care, infection surveillance, and the prevention of specific nosocomial and seasonal infections. However, many of these practices have not been definitively proven to provide patients the intended benefit of decreased infection rates or improved survival. Furthermore, each intervention comes with a financial and social cost. With institutional cost containment efforts and recent trials suggesting that patients may be safely cared for in the outpatient environment after allogeneic transplantation, many widely held practices in managing the transplant environment are being reconsidered. With changing practices, transplant teams are encouraged to review local patterns of infections and associated complications and communicate regularly with infection control committees for guidance on the evolution of isolation needs for the immunosuppressed patient.

Home care versus hospital care of patients with hematological malignancies and chemotherapy-induced cytopenia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review study is to examine the accumulating evidence of safety of home care, with regard to infection-related morbidity and mortality, for patients with chemotherapy-induced cytopenia, in light of previous studies on the necessity of protective isolation (PI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The existing literature on PI, and home care of cytopenic patients after chemotherapy, published in the English language, based on a Medline search, is reviewed.

RESULTS

The studies published so far on home care versus hospital care are all non-randomized studies and confirm that home care of cytopenic patients is safe, in terms of morbidity and mortality due to infections. On the other hand, the majority of studies on the comparison of PI with standard hospital care conclude that an infection-preventive effect of PI exists. The pooled statistics performed confirmed that such an effect of PI exists regarding the occurrence of severe infections, although no benefit to mortality has been shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding home care, only the results of a prospective, randomized study of sufficient power will enable definitive conclusions to be drawn as to whether home care is equally safe as hospital-based care with PI.

Is it safe to treat allogeneic stem cell transplanted recipients at home during the pancytopenic phase?

BACKGROUND

After myeloablative treatment and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), patients are kept isolated in the hospital to prevent infections during neutropenia.

METHODS

So far, 22 patients have been given the choice of being treated at home. Eleven could not be treated at home, and they served as controls. Most of them had haematological malignancies. The donors were 12 HLA-compatible unrelated, 9 HLA-identical siblings and one twin.

RESULTS

In the home care group, 3 developed bacteraemia, compared to 9 in the controls (p<0.01). The patient in the home care group had fewer days on total parenteral nutrition (median 3 vs. 24, p<0.001), required fewer erythrocyte transfusions (median 4 vs. 8, p=0.01), fewer days on i.v. antibiotics (median 6 vs. 13 days), and on analgesics (median 0 vs. 15) than the controls (p<0.05). Days with fever, time to engraftment, days with G-CSF and acute GVHD were the same in the two groups. 7/11 patients treated at home were readmitted to the ward for median 3 (0-7) days, due to fever or lack of a caregiver at home. Days to discharge to the out-patient clinic was faster in the group treated at home (median 20 vs 35 days, p<0.01).

DISCUSSION

Patients who were treated at home enjoyed being active and taking a walk when they felt like it. This preliminary report suggests that home care after ASCT is not only safe, but better than isolation in the hospital.

Is there still an indication for nursing patients with prolonged neutropenia in protective isolation? An evidence-based nursing and medical study of 4 years experience for nursing patients with neutropenia without isolation

Patients with severe neutropenia due to high-dose chemotherapy and/or total-body irradiation are at risk of serious infections and are frequently nursed in strict protective isolation. This is a costly procedure and results in a psychological burden for the patient and its significance has been debated for a long time. The introduction of very potent systemic antibiotics, antibiotic prophylaxis, haematopoietic growth factors and peripheral stem cell transplantation might have decreased the need for it. We performed a systematic literature review and conducted a medical/nursing guideline study. In the literature we searched especially for prospective randomised studies. Only six were found, these were prospective randomised studies and contradicted each other on the usefulness of protective isolation. In an initiative aimed at promoting evidence-based care, we conducted a combined medical and nursing guideline study consisting of three parts: (1) inventory of (inter) national guidelines; (2) analysis of potential sources of infection; and (3) follow-up study post-implementation of new guidelines.

RESULTS

(1) The practices in different centres in Europe appeared to vary widely. (2) Micro-organisms spread easily, especially if hands are not adequately dried. Isolation does not prevent this. Based on these findings we decided to stop protective isolation. This change of policy was combined with a campaign for optimal hygiene and introduction of hand alcohol. (3) We monitored the incidence of febrile neutropenia, infections and use of systemic antibiotics and antifungals in a 3-year period without protective isolation and compared this with the findings in the preceding 3 years with isolation. No significant differences in infections and mortality were found. We concluded that abandoning protective isolation combined with increased hygienic measures in nursing of patients with severe neutropenia does not increase the risk of infections, but improves the quality of care and patient satisfaction and reduces costs.

Home care during the pancytopenic phase after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is advantageous compared with hospital care

After myeloablative treatment and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), patients are kept in isolation rooms in the hospital to prevent neutropenic infections. During a 3-year period, patients were given the option of treatment at home after SCT. Daily visits by an experienced nurse and daily phone calls from a physician from the unit were included in the protocol. We compared 36 patients who wished to be treated at home with 18 patients who chose hospital care (control group 1). A matched control group of 36 patients treated in the hospital served as control group 2. All home care patients had hematologic malignancies and 19 were in first remission or first chronic phase. Of the donors, 25 were unrelated. The patients spent a median of 16 days at home (range, 0-26 days). Before discharge to the outpatient clinic after SCT, patients spent a median of 4 days (range, 0-39 days) in the hospital. In the multivariate analysis, the home care patients were discharged earlier (relative risk [RR] 0.33, P =.03), had fewer days on total parenteral nutrition (RR 0.24, P <.01), less acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV (RR 0.25, P =.01), lower transplantation-related mortality rates (RR 0.22, P =.04), and lower costs (RR 0.37, P <.05), compared with the controls treated in the hospital. The 2-year survival rates were 70% in the home care group versus 51% and 57% (not significant) in the 2 control groups, respectively (P <.03). To conclude, home care after SCT is a novel and safe approach. This study found it to be advantageous, compared with hospital care.

Is it safe to treat allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients at home during the pancytopenic phase? A pilot trial

After myeloablative treatment and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), patients are kept isolated in the hospital to prevent infections during neutropenia. To date, 22 patients have been given the choice of being treated at home. Eleven could not be treated at home, and they served as controls. Most had haematological malignancies. The donors were 12 HLA-compatible unrelated, nine HLA-identical siblings and one twin. In the home care group, three developed bacteraemia, compared to nine in the controls (P < 0.01). Patients in the home care group had fewer days of total parenteral nutrition (median 3 vs 24, P < 0.001), required fewer erythrocyte transfusions (median 4 vs 8, P = 0.01), fewer days on i.v. antibiotics (median 6 vs 13 days), and on analgesics (median 0 vs 15) than the controls (P < 0.05). Days with fever, time to engraftment, days with G-CSF and acute GVHD were the same in the two groups. Seven of 11 patients treated at home were readmitted to the ward for a median of 3 (0-7) days, due to fever or lack of a caregiver at home. Days to discharge to the out-patient clinic were faster in the group treated at home (median 20 vs 35 days, P < 0.01). Patients who were treated at home enjoyed being active and taking a walk when they felt like it. This preliminary report suggests that home care after ASCT is not only safe, but superior to isolation in the hospital.

Isolation in BMT: a protection or a privation?

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is an increasingly important therapy not only in the treatment of haematological oncology, but also of solid tumours. How best to protect the profoundly immunosuppressed transplant patient is controversial. This article presents a brief resume of the literature on isolation in BMT and an account of observations made by the author when visiting a selection of BMT centres in the UK, USA and Canada.

Selected complications of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Patients receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplant experience multiple complications. Specifically, infection, renal complications, VOD, and GVHD can produce life-threatening toxicity. Many of the treatments cause further compromise of major organs. Astute nursing assessment and prompt interventions can decrease the severity experienced by the patient. Each of these complications requires ongoing study to develop new therapies for management.

Audit of nutritional advice given to bone marrow transplant patients in the United Kingdom and Eire

OBJECTIVE

To determine the dietary advice, catering practices, anthropometry and nutritional support given to bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients in the United Kingdom and Eire and to compare current advice with published literature recommendations.

DESIGN

Questionnaire survey completed by consultants and dietitians.

SETTING

43 hospitals undertaking autografts and/or allografts.

PARTICIPANTS

Consultant Haematologists and Senior Dietitians.

RESULTS

A 75% response rate was achieved. There is a wide variation in both dietary advice and nutritional support given to BMT patients.

CONCLUSION

The wide variations in clinical practice reflect the lack of research in this area. The current problems of giving advice are discussed and some specific suggestions are made. Advice needs to be consistent and within the limitations of existing research.

Immune ablation with stem-cell rescue: a possible cure for systemic lupus erythematosus?

The impressive prolongation of survival has been the most important progress made in clinical systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Quality of life has also greatly improved, including pregnancy. However, persisting disease and therapy-related morbidity outcomes justify new approaches, different from the usual long-term palliative immunosuppression. Haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from healthy histocompatible mice are capable of curing murine SLE after eradication of the original HSCs with total body irradiation. Syngeneic and even autologous HSCs are also capable of curing induced experimental autoimmune diseases such as adjuvant arthritis and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. In man allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation (BMT) is becoming progressively safer, but cannot yet be offered to SLE patients. However, syngeneic transplants from twins non-concordant for the disease would be justified. Conditioning with high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by autologous HSC rescue, from the marrow and/or from the peripheral blood, may already be regarded as a powerful immunosuppressive procedure for selected cases of SLE and other severe autoimmune diseases. Autologous transplant procedures are not saddled with the immunologic problems of allo-BMT. Although eradication of SLE may not be achieved by auto-BMT, minimal residual immunologic disease can be suppressed or controlled, and long-term self-maintained remissions may be expected.