1
|
Moulton A, Liu JK, Miguel de Virgilio C, Ozao-Choy J, Moazzez A. The Impact of Postoperative COVID-19 Infection on 30-day Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Am Surg 2024:31348241248800. [PMID: 38655851 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: Preoperative Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections are associated with postoperative adverse outcomes. However, there is limited data on the impact of postoperative COVID-19 infection on postoperative outcomes of common general surgery procedures.Objective: To evaluate the impact of postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis on laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes.Methods: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis, or gallstone pancreatitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative cholangiogram were identified using the 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with and without a postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis. Coarsened Exact Matching was used to match the groups based on preoperative risk factors, and outcomes were compared.Results: A total of 47,948 patients were included. In the aggregate cohort, 31% were male, and mean age was 50 years. Age, BMI, smoking, COPD, CHF, preoperative sepsis, and ASA class were significantly different between the two groups. After matching, there were no differences in characteristics. 30-day morbidity (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1), pneumonia (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 1.7-15.0), DVT (OR = 8.22, 95% CI 1.0-66), reoperation (OR = 9.3, 95% CI 1.2-73.8), and readmission (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 2.3-10.1) continued to be significantly worse in the matched cohort.Conclusion: Postoperative COVID-19 infection was associated with worse outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings suggest that even postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis increases the risk for adverse outcomes in patients recovering from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and may indicate that precautions should be taken and new COVID-19 infections even after surgery should be closely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Moulton
- Department of Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Jessica K Liu
- Department of Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christian Miguel de Virgilio
- Department of Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Junko Ozao-Choy
- Department of Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ashkan Moazzez
- Department of Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang WG, Peng YF, Yang YB, Li B, Wei YG, Liu F. Timing of hepatectomy following the Omicron variant infection for vaccinated-patients: A retrospective cohort study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024:S1499-3872(24)00001-8. [PMID: 38281903 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wu-Gui Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yu-Fu Peng
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yu-Bo Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Bo Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yong-Gang Wei
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guarino G, Sgromolo N, Giladi AM. Considerations for Perioperative Thromboembolic Risk Mitigation in Actively and Recently COVID-19-Positive Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2024; 6:103-106. [PMID: 38313610 PMCID: PMC10837296 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID) induces a hypercoagulable state causing an increased risk of venous and arterial thromboses. Distal limb and microvascular circulation are critical to the success of many hand surgeries, and patients who are actively or recently infected with COVID may be at a higher risk for perioperative thrombotic events. Little information is available regarding how to handle actively or recently infected COVID patients, including preoperative risk assessment, intraoperative decision making, and postoperative considerations regarding thrombotic risk. Our aim was to review the literature to determine how the hand surgeon can best prepare for and manage the actively or recently COVID-positive patients undergoing hand surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianna Guarino
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicole Sgromolo
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Aviram M. Giladi
- The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takeuchi M, Endo H, Hibi T, Seishima R, Nakano Y, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Maeda H, Hanazaki K, Taketomi A, Kakeji Y, Seto Y, Ueno H, Mori M, Kitagawa Y. The impact of COVID-19 for postoperative outcomes using a nationwide Japanese database of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:887-895. [PMID: 37927923 PMCID: PMC10623976 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had resulted in either failure to provide required medical resources or delayed treatment for gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of postoperative complications using a nationwide Japanese database of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods We collected the data of patients who underwent distal gastrectomy from January 2018 to December 2021 from the National Clinical Database (NCD), a web-based surgical registration system in Japan. The number of surgical cases, the use of intensive care units, and the incidence of morbidity per month were analyzed. We also calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), defined as the ratio of the number of observed patients to the expected number of patients calculated using the risk calculator established in the NCD, for several morbidities, including pneumonia, sepsis, 30-day mortality, and surgical mortality. Results A decrease of 568 gastrectomies was observed from April 2020 to May 2020. Although the absolute number of patients admitted to intensive care units had declined since 2020, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU did not change before and after the pandemic. Mortality and critical morbidity (such as pneumonia and sepsis) rates were not worse during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic periods per the SMR. Conclusions Surgical management was conducted adequately through the organized efforts of the entire surgery department in our country even in a pandemic during which medical resources and staff may have been limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Takeuchi
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hideki Endo
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of Medicine, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and TransplantationKumamoto University Graduate School of Medical SciencesKumamotoJapan
| | - Ryo Seishima
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yutaka Nakano
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of Medicine, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of Medicine, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | | | | | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University HospitalHokkaidoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryGraduate School of Medicine, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | | | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takeuchi M, Endo H, Hibi T, Seishima R, Nakano Y, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Maeda H, Hanazaki K, Taketomi A, Kakeji Y, Seto Y, Ueno H, Mori M, Kitagawa Y. Analysis of the short-term outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic using data from a nationwide Japanese database. Esophagus 2023; 20:617-625. [PMID: 37347341 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-023-01017-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had adversely impacted cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We investigated the change in medical resource, such as the intensive care unit use, and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy during the pandemic. METHODS Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan from January 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. The time series change in the number of surgical cases; usage of intensive care unit; incidence of morbidity and mortality; standardized mortality and morbidity ratio (SMR) for 30-days mortality; surgical mortality; and morbidities for pneumonia, sepsis, unplanned intubation, and anastomotic leakage were evaluated. RESULTS The annual number of patients undergoing esophagectomy remained similar from 2018 to 2021. The negative impact of the pandemic on medical resources was strongly identified in the patients from an epidemic area where there is a higher cumulative number of infections per population as compared to all prefectures. The proportions of patients admitted to the intensive care unit were 91.4%, 93.0%, 91.6%, and 90.5% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Moreover, 93.3%, 94.0%, 92.0%, and 90.9% patients who underwent surgery in an epidemic area were admitted to the intensive care unit in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. However, the morbidity and mortality rates during the pandemic did not worsen according to the SMR values. CONCLUSIONS Esophagectomy was performed during the pandemic despite limited medical resources by a systematic endeavor of the entire surgical department in Japan, without increasing the incidence rate of worse outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hideki Endo
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuoku, Kumamoto, 860-8582, Japan.
| | - Ryo Seishima
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yutaka Nakano
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Maeda
- Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | | | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beaulieu RJ. Preoperative Assessment of Patients with Vascular Disease. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:577-594. [PMID: 37455026 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Patients with vascular disease represent a particularly high-risk surgical population. Many of the comorbidities that contribute to their vascular presentation impact a number of vascular beds or other organ systems. As a result, these patients have the highest rates of cardiac and pulmonary complications among patients with noncardiac surgery. The vascular surgeon is in a unique position to help evaluate and treat many of these conditions to not only reduce the perioperative risk but also to improve the patient's overall health. This article presents a comprehensive review of the common preoperative evaluations that have a high impact on patients with vascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Beaulieu
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maxwell BG, Greenlaw A, Mako J, Lundeberg MR. SARS-Co-V-2 positive status is associated with a more seriously injured population of trauma patients but not independently associated with worse outcomes of trauma care. J Inj Violence Res 2023; 15:129-136. [PMID: 37393520 PMCID: PMC10915877 DOI: 10.5249/jivr.v15i2.1818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 positive status has been considered a predominantly incidental finding among trauma patients. We sought to examine whether concurrent infection is associated with worse outcomes in a contemporary cohort of injured patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Retrospective cohort analysis of a level I trauma center's institutional registry from May 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. The prevalence of COVID in the trauma population was compared monthly using prevalence ratios relative to population estimates. Unadjusted cohorts of COVID+ vs COVID- trauma patients were compared. COVID+ patients then were matched on age, mechanism of injury, year, and injury severity score (ISS) with COVID- controls for adjusted analysis with a primary composite outcome of mortality. RESULTS Out of n=2,783 trauma activations, n=51 (1.8%) were COVID+. Compared to the general population, the trauma population had prevalence ratios for COVID of 5.3 to 79.7 (median=20.8). Compared to COVID- patients, COVID+ patients had worse outcomes, including a higher proportion who were admitted to the ICU, required intubation, underwent a major operation, and had greater total charges and a longer length of stay. However, these differences appeared related to more severe injury patterns in the COVID+ cohort. In the adjusted analysis, no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome variables were observed. CONCLUSIONS Worse trauma outcomes in COVID+ patients appear to be correlated to the more substantial patterns of injury observed in this group. Trauma patients have substantially higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 positivity than the local population at large. These results reinforce that this population is vulnerable to multiple threats. They will guide the ongoing delivery of care in shaping the needs for testing, PPE for those delivering care, and the capacity and operational needs of trauma systems that must care for a population with such high rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan G Maxwell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Andrea Greenlaw
- Department of Trauma Services, Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jeffrey Mako
- Department of Anesthesiology, Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Megan R Lundeberg
- Department of Surgery, Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prasad NK, Mayorga-Carlin M, Sahoo S, Englum BR, Turner DJ, Siddiqui T, Lake R, Sorkin JD, Lal BK. Mid-term Surgery Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: Results From a Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:920-928. [PMID: 35762608 PMCID: PMC9794632 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine mid-term postoperative outcomes among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive (+) patients compared with those who never tested positive before surgery. BACKGROUND COVID-19 is thought to be associated with prohibitively high rates of postoperative complications. However, prior studies have only evaluated 30-day outcomes, and most did not adjust for demographic, clinical, or procedural characteristics. METHODS We analyzed data from surgeries performed at all Veterans Affairs hospitals between March 2020 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves compared trends in mortality and Cox proportional hazards models estimated rates of mortality and pulmonary, thrombotic, and septic postoperative complications between patients with a positive preoperative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test [COVID (+)] and propensity score-matched COVID-negative (-) patients. RESULTS Of 153,741 surgical patients, 4778 COVID (+) were matched to 14,101 COVID (-). COVID (+) status was associated with higher postoperative mortality ( P <0.0001) with a 6-month survival of 94.2% (95% confidence interval: 93.2-95.2) versus 96.0% (95% confidence interval: 95.7.0-96.4) in COVID (-). The highest mortality was in the first 30 postoperative days. Hazards for mortality and postoperative complications in COVID (+) decreased with increasing time between testing COVID (+) and date of surgery. COVID (+) patients undergoing elective surgery had similar rates of mortality, thrombotic and septic complications, but higher rates of pulmonary complications than COVID (-) patients. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of mid-term outcomes among COVID-19 patients undergoing surgery. COVID-19 is associated with decreased overall and complication-free survival primarily in the early postoperative period, delaying surgery by 5 weeks or more reduces risk of complications. Case urgency has a multiplicative effect on short-term and long-term risk of postoperative mortality and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil K Prasad
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Minerva Mayorga-Carlin
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shalini Sahoo
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brian R Englum
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Douglas J. Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tariq Siddiqui
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rachel Lake
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - John D Sorkin
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brajesh K Lal
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Argandykov D, Dorken-Gallastegi A, El Moheb M, Gebran A, Proaño-Zamudio JA, Bokenkamp M, Renne AM, Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A, Kaafarani HM. Is perioperative COVID-19 really associated with worse surgical outcomes? A nationwide COVIDSurg propensity-matched analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 94:513-524. [PMID: 36949053 PMCID: PMC10044588 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing surgery with perioperative COVID-19 are suggested to have worse outcomes, but whether this is COVID-related or due to selection bias remains unclear. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients with and without perioperative COVID-19. METHODS Patients with perioperative COVID-19 diagnosed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery between February and July 2020 from 68 US hospitals in COVIDSurg, an international multicenter database, were 1:1 propensity score matched to patients without COVID-19 undergoing similar procedures in the 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The matching criteria included demographics (e.g., age, sex), comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease), and operation characteristics (e.g., type, urgency, complexity). The primary outcome was 30-day hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and 13 postoperative complications (e.g., pneumonia, renal failure, surgical site infection). RESULTS A total of 97,936 patients were included, 1,054 with and 96,882 without COVID-19. Prematching, COVID-19 patients more often underwent emergency surgery (76.1% vs. 10.3%, p < 0.001). A total of 843 COVID-19 and 843 non-COVID-19 patients were successfully matched based on demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics. Postmatching, COVID-19 patients had a higher mortality (12.0% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.007), longer length of stay (6 [2-15] vs. 5 [1-12] days), and higher rates of acute renal failure (19.3% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001), sepsis (13.5% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.003), and septic shock (11.8% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.001). They also had higher rates of thromboembolic complications such as deep vein thrombosis (4.4% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (2.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001) but lower rates of bleeding (11.6% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing surgery with perioperative COVID-19 have higher rates of 30-day mortality and postoperative complications, especially thromboembolic, compared with similar patients without COVID-19 undergoing similar surgeries. Such information is crucial for the complex surgical decision making and counseling of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level IV.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rampes S, Ma D. The potential impact of COVID-19 disease caused multi-organ injuries on patients' surgical outcomes. APS 2023; 1:4. [DOI: 10.1007/s44254-023-00004-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To provide an expert commentary on the impact of prior COVID-19 infection on patient’s surgical outcomes and postoperative recovery. To highlight the need for greater focus on peri-operative care of patients who have recovered from COVID-19.
Methods
A narrative review of the literature was conducted by searching Pubmed and EMBASE for relevant articles using keywords such as “COVID-19”, “Coronavirus”, “surgery” and “peri-operative infection”.
Results
Post-COVID-19 condition also known as long COVID has an estimated incidence of between 3.0 to 11.7%. COVID-19 has been shown to cause a series of short and long-term sequelae including cardiopulmonary complications, renal impairment, chronic fatigue and muscular deconditioning. Peri-operative infection with COVID-19 is associated with increased peri-operative mortality. Elective surgery patients who developed COVID-19 were 26 times more likely to die whilst in hospital compared to controls without COVID-19 infection, and for emergency surgery patients with COVID-19 infection were six times more likely to die. A large international prospective cohort study identified that patients who had surgery delayed over 7 weeks from the date of COVID-19 infection had no increased 30-day postoperative mortality, except those with ongoing symptoms.
Conclusions
COVID-19 infection and its complications have been shown to adversely affect surgical outcomes. Further research is required to better characterise long COVID and the long-term sequelae that develop, which should be used to guide comprehensive peri-operative assessment of patients.
Graphical Abstract
Collapse
|
11
|
Jin Y, Lee S, Kim D, Hur J, Eom W. Combinations of nerve blocks in surgery for post COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae patient: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:1198-1205. [PMID: 36874415 PMCID: PMC9979286 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional anesthesia is a promising method in patients with post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pulmonary sequelae for preserving pulmonary function and preventing postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with general anesthesia.
CASE SUMMARY We provided surgical anesthesia and analgesia suitable for breast surgery by performing pectoral nerve block type II (PECS-II), parasternal, and intercostobrachial nerve blocks with intravenous dexmedetomidine administration in a 61-year-old female patient with severe pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 infection.
CONCLUSION Sufficient analgesia for 7 h was provided via PECS-II, parasternal, and intercostobrachial blocks perioperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yehun Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Suzie Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Daehyun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Jangho Hur
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Woosik Eom
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guo B, Zhao C, He MZ, Senter C, Zhou Z, Peng J, Li S, Fitzpatrick AL, Lindström S, Stebbins RC, Noppert GA, Li C. Long-term cardiac symptoms following COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv 2023:2023.01.16.23284620. [PMID: 36711624 PMCID: PMC9882562 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.16.23284620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Background There is growing body of literature on the long-term cardiac symptoms following COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize and evaluate related evidence to inform clinical management and future studies. Methods We searched two preprint and seven peer-reviewed article databases from January 1, 2020 to January 8, 2022 for studies investigating cardiac symptoms that persisted for at least 4 weeks among individuals who survived COVID-19. A customized Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the proportion of symptoms with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and stratified analyses were conducted to quantify the proportion of symptoms by study characteristics and quality. Results A total of 101 studies describing 49 unique long-term cardiac symptoms met the inclusion criteria. Based on quality assessment, only 15.8% of the studies (n=16) were of high quality, and most studies scored poorly on sampling representativeness. The two most examined symptoms were chest pain and arrhythmia. Meta-analysis showed that the proportion of chest pain was 10.1% (95% CI: 6.4-15.5) and arrhythmia was 9.8% (95% CI: 5.4-17.2). Stratified analyses showed that studies with low-quality score, small sample size, unsystematic sampling method, and cross-sectional design were most likely to report high proportions of symptoms. For example, the proportion of chest pain was 21.3% (95% CI: 10.5-38.5), 9.3% (95% CI: 6.0-14.0), and 4.0% (95% CI: 1.3-12.0) in studies with low, medium, and high-quality scores, respectively. Similar patterns were observed for other cardiac symptoms including hypertension, cardiac abnormalities, myocardial injury, thromboembolism, stroke, heart failure, coronary disease, and myocarditis. Discussion There is a wide spectrum of long-term cardiac symptoms following COVID-19. Findings of existing studies are strongly related to study quality, size and design, underscoring the need for high-quality epidemiologic studies to characterize these symptoms and understand their etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boya Guo
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Chenya Zhao
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mike Z He
- Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Camilla Senter
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Zhenwei Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jin Peng
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Song Li
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Annette L Fitzpatrick
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sara Lindström
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Rebecca C Stebbins
- Social, Genetic, & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Grace A Noppert
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chihua Li
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, MI, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neumaier M, Thirukumaran C, Ramirez G, Ricciardi B. Heightened 30-Day Postoperative Complication Risk Persists After COVID-19 Infection. World J Surg 2023; 47:40-49. [PMID: 36201028 PMCID: PMC9540151 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06767-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current literature describing the riskiness of operating on actively infected COVID-19 patients far outnumbers that on the risk of operating on recovered patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze a single, tertiary referral center experience regarding postoperative complications and readmissions in COVID-19-recovered patients versus COVID-19-naïve (never previously infected) patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery across all surgical subspecialties. METHODS All PCR positive COVID-19 patients that underwent a surgical procedure between February 1, 2020, and November 1, 2020, were included in the COVID-positive cohort. These patients were then matched to COVID-naïve controls that underwent similar procedures within the same time frame. Primary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications as well as 90-day readmissions. Multivariable analyses were also performed. RESULTS 112 COVID-positive patients met inclusion criteria and were all matched to COVID-naïve controls. 76 patients (68%) underwent surgery > 30 days from their COVID diagnosis. COVID-positive patients were at significantly higher risk of 30-day complications compared to the COVID-naïve cohort (22% versus 8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Multivariable analyses found ambulatory/asymptomatic infections, undergoing surgery between 30 and 120 days from diagnosis, initial presentation to the emergency department and elevated ASA scores to be significantly associated with 30-day complications. No differences were found for 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSION Patients with previous COVID-19 infections carry a higher perioperative risk profile for 30-day complications compared to COVID-naïve counterparts in unvaccinated populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Neumaier
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Caroline Thirukumaran
- grid.16416.340000 0004 1936 9174Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY USA
| | - Gabriel Ramirez
- grid.16416.340000 0004 1936 9174Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY USA
| | - Benjamin Ricciardi
- grid.16416.340000 0004 1936 9174Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 665, Rochester, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Plekhanov AN, Tovarshinov AI, Plekhanov NA. [Features of surgical patients of COVID-19 patients]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:51-56. [PMID: 37379405 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202307151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
The novel coronavirus pandemic has significantly increased the workload of surgical service worldwide. Restrictive measures led to postponement of elective surgical and diagnostic interventions and reduced the number of emergency manipulations around the world. Large-scale studies identified optimal period for postponing surgical procedures and advisability of this postponement. The authors present opinions of surgeons and their views on treatment strategy for various elective and emergency surgical interventions in abdominal surgery, traumatology-orthopedics and oncology. The main factors reducing perioperative mortality in patients with a new coronavirus infection are observance of anti-epidemic measures by patients and medical personnel, competent use of personal protective equipment, as well as adherence to protocols and algorithms for the treatment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Plekhanov
- Dorzhi Banzarov Buryat State University, Ulan-Ude, Russia
- Irkutsk Research Center for Surgery and Traumatology, Irkutsk, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Clancy PW, Knio ZO, Zuo Z. Positive SARS-CoV-2 detection on intraoperative nasopharyngeal viral testing is not associated with worse outcomes for asymptomatic elective surgical patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1065625. [PMID: 36619625 PMCID: PMC9810621 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1065625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It has been demonstrated that surgical patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk for postoperative complications. However, this association has not been tested in asymptomatic elective surgical patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study among elective gynecological and spine surgery patients at a single tertiary medical center from July 2020 through April 2022 (n = 1,130) was performed. The primary endpoint was prolonged (>75th percentile for the corresponding surgical service) length of stay. Secondary endpoints included postoperative respiratory complications, duration of supplemental oxygen therapy, and other major adverse events. The association between SARS-CoV-2 detection and the above outcomes was investigated with univariate and multivariable analyses. Findings Of 1,130 patients who met inclusion criteria, 30 (2.7%) experienced intraoperative detection of SARS-CoV-2. Those with intraoperative viral detection did not experience an increased incidence of prolonged length of stay [16.7% vs. 23.2%; RR, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.32-1.61); P = 0.531] nor did they have a longer mean length of stay (4.1 vs. 3.9 days; P = 0.441). Rates of respiratory complications [3.3% vs. 2.9%; RR, 1.15 (95% CI, 0.16-8.11); P = 0.594] and mean duration of supplemental oxygen therapy (9.7 vs. 9.3 h; P = 0.552) were similar as well. All other outcomes were similar in those with and without intraoperative detection of SARS-CoV-2 (all P > 0.05). Interpretation Asymptomatic patients with incidental detection of SARS-CoV-2 on intraoperative testing do not experience disproportionately worse outcomes in the elective spine and gynecologic surgical population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul W. Clancy
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States,School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Ziyad O. Knio
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Zhiyi Zuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States,*Correspondence: Zhiyi Zuo,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khan IA, Zaid MB, Gold PA, Austin MS, Parvizi J, Bedard NA, Jevsevar DS, Hannon CP, Fillingham YA. Making a Joint Decision Regarding the Timing of Surgery for Elective Arthroplasty Surgery After Being Infected With COVID-19: A Systematic Review. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:2106-2113.e1. [PMID: 35533820 PMCID: PMC9074381 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a substantial number of patients to have their elective arthroplasty surgeries rescheduled. While it is established that patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing surgery have a significantly higher risk of experiencing postoperative complications and mortality, it is not well-known at what time after testing positive the risk of postoperative complications or mortality returns to normal. METHODS PubMed (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and professional society websites were systematically reviewed on March 7, 2022 to identify studies and guidelines on the optimal timeframe to reschedule patients for elective surgery after preoperatively testing positive for COVID-19. Outcomes included postoperative complications such as mortality, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, and pulmonary embolism. RESULTS A total of 14 studies and professional society guidelines met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 should be rescheduled 4-8 weeks after testing positive (as long as they do not develop symptoms in the interim), patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 should be rescheduled 6-8 weeks after testing positive (with complete resolution of symptoms), and patients with severe/critical COVID-19 should be rescheduled at a minimum of 12 weeks after hospital discharge (with complete resolution of symptoms). CONCLUSIONS Given the negative association between preoperative COVID-19 and postoperative complications, patients should have elective arthroplasty surgery rescheduled at differing timeframes based on their symptoms. In addition, a multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach to rescheduling patients is recommended. Further study is needed to examine the impact of novel COVID-19 variants and vaccination on timeframes for rescheduling surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan A. Khan
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Address correspondence to: Irfan A. Khan, ATC, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19017
| | - Musa B. Zaid
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter A. Gold
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew S. Austin
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - David S. Jevsevar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Yale A. Fillingham
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Al Ani A, Tahtamoni R, Mohammad Y, Al-Ayoubi F, Haider N, Al-Mashhadi A. Impacts of severity of Covid-19 infection on the morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 79:103910. [PMID: 35698648 PMCID: PMC9176105 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction One of the challenges of surgery on patients with active SARS-CoV-2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection is the increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Aim This study will describe and compare the postoperative morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic patients or those with mild infection with those with severe COVID-19 infection undergoing elective or and emergency surgery. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study of 37 COVID19 patients who had the infection 7 days prior to and 30 days after emergency or elective surgery. Patients were divided to two groups. Group1: the asymptomatic or those with mild infection that is diagnosed just before surgery (14 patients). Group 2: those who were admitted to the hospital because of severe COVID-19 and were operated for COVID-19 related complications (23 patients). Morbidity and mortality of both groups was studied. Results There was no significant difference in gender between the two groups. There were 5 females (2 in group 1, and 3 in group 2) and 32 males (12 in group 1, and 20 in group 2). Mean age for all patients was 49.8years (38 for group 1 and 57 for group2). Median age for all patients was 50 years (37.5 for group 1 and 57 years for group 2). Sepsis developed in 7 patients (1 patient in group 1 and in 6 patients in group 2). Statistically there was no significant difference in occurrence of sepsis between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the intensive care stay between the two groups (higher in group 2). Four deaths were reported in group 1 and fourteen in group 2. Eighteen out of thirty-seven patients died. Conclusion Severity of COVID-19 infection will prolong the hospitalization and ICU stay in surgical patients with no significant effect on mortality.
Collapse
|
18
|
Klutts GN, Squires A, Bowman SM, Bhavaraju A, Kalkwarf KJ. Increased Lengths of Stay, ICU, and Ventilator Days in Trauma Patients with Asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection. Am Surg 2022; 88:1522-1525. [PMID: 35416700 PMCID: PMC9014328 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221082290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus has varying clinical effects—from asymptomatic patients to life-threatening illness and death. At the only Level 1 Trauma Center in a rural state, outcomes appeared worse in trauma patients who tested positive for COVID despite these patients presumably being asymptomatic or only mildly affected before their traumatic event. This study compares all trauma admissions that were COVID-positive to those who were not. Methods The institutional database was queried for all level 1 and 2 trauma activations from March 2020-July 2021. The analysis consisted of a multivariate regression between COVID-negative and the COVID-positive group controlling for age, injury severity score (ISS), and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Outcomes compared were hospital length-of-stay (LOS), ICU LOS, ventilator days, days to discharge to a facility, and in-hospital mortality. Results Hospital LOS was 2.7 days longer in the COVID-positive group (P < .0005). ICU LOS was 2.9 days longer for patients admitted to the ICU in the COVID positive-group (P = .017). Ventilator days were 4.7 days longer for patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the COVID-positive group (P = .002). Discharge to a post-acute facility required 6.1 more days in the COVID-positive group (P = .005). Conclusion Trauma patients presenting positive for COVID-19 are presumed to be asymptomatic before their traumatic event. Despite this, the physiologic toll of trauma combined with the COVID infection causes significantly worse clinical outcomes, including increasing hospital days in this patient population, which continues to tax the already burdened healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett N Klutts
- Department of Surgery, 12215University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Austin Squires
- Department of Surgery, 12215University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Stephen M Bowman
- Department of Surgery, 12215University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Avi Bhavaraju
- Department of Surgery, 12215University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Kyle J Kalkwarf
- Department of Surgery, 12215University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Prasad NK, Lake R, Englum BR, Turner DJ, Siddiqui T, Mayorga-Carlin M, Sorkin JD, Lal BK. COVID-19 Vaccination Associated With Reduced Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Morbidity. Ann Surg 2022; 275:31-36. [PMID: 34417362 PMCID: PMC8678152 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on postoperative mortality, pulmonary and thrombotic complications, readmissions and hospital lengths of stay among patients undergoing surgery in the United States. BACKGROUND While vaccination prevents COVID-19, little is known about its impact on postoperative complications. METHODS This is a nationwide observational cohort study of all 1,255 Veterans Affairs facilities nationwide. We compared patients undergoing surgery at least 2 weeks after their second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna vaccines, to contemporary propensity score matched controls. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and postoperative COVID-19 infection. Secondary endpoints were pulmonary or thrombotic complications, readmissions, and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS 30,681 patients met inclusion criteria. After matching, there were 3,104 in the vaccination group (1,903 received the Pfizer BioNTech, and 1,201 received the Moderna vaccine) and 7,438 controls. Full COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower rates of postoperative 30-day COVID-19 infection (Incidence Rate Ratio and 95% confidence intervals, 0.09 [0.01,0.44]), pulmonary complications (0.54 [0.39, 0.72]), thrombotic complications (0.68 [0.46, 0.99]) and decreased hospital lengths of stay (0.78 [0.69, 0.89]). Complications were also low in vaccinated patients who tested COVID-19 positive before surgery but events were too few to detect a significant difference compared to controls. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccination is associated with lower rates of postoperative morbidity. The benefit is most pronounced among individuals who have never had a COVID-19 infection before surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil K Prasad
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rachel Lake
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brian R Englum
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Douglas J Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tariq Siddiqui
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - Minerva Mayorga-Carlin
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| | - John D Sorkin
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brajesh K Lal
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Prasad NK, Lake R, Englum BR, Turner DJ, Siddiqui T, Mayorga-Carlin M, Sorkin JD, Lal BK. Increased complications in patients who test COVID-19 positive after elective surgery and implications for pre and postoperative screening. Am J Surg 2021; 223:380-387. [PMID: 33894979 PMCID: PMC8045424 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the adoption of protocols to minimize risk of periprocedural complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This typically involves a preoperative symptom screen and nasal swab RT-PCR test for viral RNA. Asymptomatic patients with a negative COVID-19 test are cleared for surgery. However, little is known about the rate of postoperative COVID-19 positivity among elective surgical patients, risk factors for this group and rate of complications. Methods This prospective multicenter study included all patients undergoing elective surgery at 170 Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals across the United States. Patients were divided into groups based on first positive COVID-19 test within 30 days after surgery (COVID[-/+]), before surgery (COVID[+/−]) or negative throughout (COVID[−/−]). The cumulative incidence, risk factors for and complications of COVID[-/+], were estimated using univariate analysis, exact matching, and multivariable regression. Results Between March 1 and December 1, 2020 90,093 patients underwent elective surgery. Of these, 60,853 met inclusion criteria, of which 310 (0.5%) were in the COVID[-/+] group. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression identified female sex, end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, cancer, cirrhosis, and undergoing neurosurgical procedures as risk factors for being in the COVID[-/+] group. After matching on current procedural terminology code and month of procedure, multivariable Poisson regression estimated the complication rate ratio for the COVID[-/+] group vs. COVID[−/−] to be 8.4 (C.I. 4.9–14.4) for pulmonary complications, 3.0 (2.2, 4.1) for major complications, and 2.6 (1.9, 3.4) for any complication. Discussion Despite preoperative COVID-19 screening, there remains a risk of COVID infection within 30 days after elective surgery. This risk is increased for patients with a high comorbidity burden and those undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Higher intensity preoperative screening and closer postoperative monitoring is warranted in such patients because they have a significantly elevated risk of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil K Prasad
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rachel Lake
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian R Englum
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Douglas J Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tariq Siddiqui
- Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Minerva Mayorga-Carlin
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John D Sorkin
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brajesh K Lal
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
El-Boghdadly K, Cook TM, Goodacre T, Kua J, Blake L, Denmark S, McNally S, Mercer N, Moonesinghe SR, Summerton DJ. SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 and timing of elective surgery: A multidisciplinary consensus statement on behalf of the Association of Anaesthetists, the Centre for Peri-operative Care, the Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:940-946. [PMID: 33735942 PMCID: PMC8250763 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The scale of the COVID‐19 pandemic means that a significant number of patients who have previously been infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 will require surgery. Given the potential for multisystem involvement, timing of surgery needs to be carefully considered to plan for safe surgery. This consensus statement uses evidence from a systematic review and expert opinion to highlight key principles in the timing of surgery. Shared decision‐making regarding timing of surgery after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection must account for severity of the initial infection; ongoing symptoms of COVID‐19; comorbid and functional status; clinical priority and risk of disease progression; and complexity of surgery. For the protection of staff, other patients and the public, planned surgery should not be considered during the period that a patient may be infectious. Precautions should be undertaken to prevent pre‐ and peri‐operative infection, especially in higher risk patients. Elective surgery should not be scheduled within 7 weeks of a diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection unless the risks of deferring surgery outweigh the risk of postoperative morbidity or mortality associated with COVID‐19. SARS‐CoV‐2 causes either transient or asymptomatic disease for most patients, who require no additional precautions beyond a 7‐week delay, but those who have persistent symptoms or have been hospitalised require special attention. Patients with persistent symptoms of COVID‐19 are at increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality even after 7 weeks. The time before surgery should be used for functional assessment, prehabilitation and multidisciplinary optimisation. Vaccination several weeks before surgery will reduce risk to patients and might lessen the risk of nosocomial SARS‐CoV‐2 infection of other patients and staff. National vaccine committees should consider whether such patients can be prioritised for vaccination. As further data emerge, these recommendations may need to be revised, but the principles presented should be considered to ensure safety of patients, the public and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K El-Boghdadly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,King's College London, London, UK
| | - T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.,University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - T Goodacre
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Manor Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - J Kua
- Health Services Research Centre, London, UK
| | - L Blake
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Library, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - S Denmark
- Patient Lay Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - S McNally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastbourne Hospital, Eastbourne, UK
| | - N Mercer
- Cleft Unit of the South West of England, Bristol Dental School, Bristol, UK
| | - S R Moonesinghe
- Centre for Peri-operative Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - D J Summerton
- Department of Urology, Leicester General Hospital and Honorary Professor, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|