Same-Day Surgery Does Not Increase Deep Infection Risk in Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

Incidence of Postoperative Infection Following Simultaneous Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures. Simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty involves performing total knee arthroplasty on both knees in a single anesthetic session. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. A primary search was performed using PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Clarivate, and Google Scholar databases. Quantitative data synthesis was performed using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.115 to determine the pooled prevalence of the infection among patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. We included 30 studies in our quantitative data synthesis, with a total population of 118,502 patients (237,004 knees). The pooled prevalence of superficial infection, deep infection, and unspecified surgical site infection was estimated to be 0.86% (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.13%), 0.84% (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.05%), and 1.18% (95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.27%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity (I2 >50%) in all analyses, and inspection of funnel plots revealed a symmetrical distribution of plotted data. We found that the infection rates following simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty were relatively low but heterogeneous, as the data showed marked variability. Superficial infections were more common than deep infections; however, there was a small difference in their prevalence. Furthermore, the reliability of our findings was limited owing to significant heterogeneity.

To Stage or Not to Stage? Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, and Discharge Disposition After Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients who have bilateral hip arthritis can be treated with bilateral total hip arthroplasty (bTHA) in either a staged or simultaneous fashion. The goal of this study was to determine whether staged and simultaneous posterior bTHA patients differ in regard to (1) patient-reported outcome measures, (2) 90-day complication rates, and (3) discharge dispositions and cumulative lengths of stay.

METHODS

Patients who (1) underwent simultaneous bTHA or staged bTHA (within 12 months) using the posterior approach, and (2) completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement surveys were included in the study. A total of 266 patients (87 simultaneous bTHA and 179 staged bTHA) were included. Chart review was performed to collect patient-level variables, postoperative complications, discharge dispositions, and lengths of stay.

RESULTS

Staged bTHA patients had higher Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical component scores compared to simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery (P = .019, .006, and .008, respectively), but these differences did not meet the minimal clinically important difference threshold for any questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA was associated with higher rate of periprosthetic fractures (P = .034) and discharge to a location other than home (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were statistically significant, but likely not clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes for staged and simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the higher periprosthetic fracture risk and greater likelihood of discharge to a rehabilitation facility associated with simultaneous bTHA. Further research should aim to understand which patients may benefit most from simultaneous bTHA.

Comparative study of bilateral total hip arthroplasty in one or two stages

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral total hip arthroplasty (Bi THA) for disabling bilateral hip osteoarthritis can be performed in one or two operative sessions. The objective of this study was to compare the complication rates of a group of patients who had bilateral THA in one operating session (Bi-1S THA) to a matched group of patients who had bilateral THA in two separate operating sessions (Bi-2S THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective case-control study compared 84 Bi-1S THA matched to 84 Bi-2S THA by age, gender, diagnosis, ASA score (1-2) and surgical approach. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Complication rates, total blood loss, number of blood transfusion units, and functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (14.3%) in the Bi-1S THA group had minor or major complications, compared to twenty-one (25%) in the Bi-2S THA group (p=0.08): there were fewer minor complications in the Bi-1S THA group and a similar rate of major complications amongst the two groups. Total blood loss estimated using the OSTHEO formula was significantly lower in patients operated on by Bi-1S THA (1853±753mL versus 2804±1012mL, p <0.0001). The number of blood transfusion units was similar between the groups (0.5±0.8 versus 0.3±1.4 respectively, p=0.55). No significant difference was found regarding the functional results.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of this study, bilateral total hip arthroplasty in one operative session leads to fewer minor complications, and a similar rate of major complications, when compared to bilateral total hip arthroplasty in two separate sessions. This strategy can therefore be recommended for ASA 1 and 2 patients, under the age of 80 with disabling bilateral osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty is a common orthopedic surgery for treating primary or secondary hip osteoarthritis. Bilateral total hip replacement could be performed in a single stage or two separate stages. Each surgical procedure's reliability, safety, and complications have been reported controversially. This study aimed to review the current evidence regarding the outcomes of simultaneous and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Eligible studies compared complications and related outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral THA. Two reviewers independently screened initial search results, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In our study, we included 29,551 patients undergoing simBTHA and 74,600 patients undergoing stgBTHA. In favor of the simBTHA, a significant reduction in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and systemic, local, and pulmonary complications was documented. However, we evidenced an increased pulmonary embolism (PE) and periprosthetic fracture risk in simBTHA. In the simBTHA, total blood loss, length of hospital stay, and total cost were lower.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that simultaneous bilateral THA accompanies fewer complications and lower total cost. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to provide robust evidence.

Thirty-Day Outcomes After Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Nationwide Cohort

Background

Approximately 42% of patients with end-stage osteoarthritis have bilateral disease. Although bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) is physiologically demanding, certain patients may benefit from simultaneous rather than staged bilateral procedures. This study examines the intraoperative differences and 30-day outcomes in patients receiving bilateral THA compared with those who underwent unilateral THA.

Methods

Patients undergoing THA were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2008 to 2015. Patients were selected according to those with primary and concurrent coding for Current Procedural Terminology 27130. Thirty-day complications were recorded, and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether concurrent THA was a risk factor for poor outcomes.

Results

A total of 97,804 patients and 587 patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral THA, respectively, were identified. Patients who underwent bilateral procedures were younger (57.3 vs 64.6 years, P < .001), were of lower body mass index (29.2 vs 30.2, P < .001), and had fewer comorbidities than patients who underwent unilateral procedures. Length of stay was not increased for bilateral recipients (3.13 vs 2.93 days, P = .308), although fewer were discharged to home (62.8% vs 77.6%, P < .001). The bilateral recipients required postoperative transfusions at a higher rate (29.8% vs 10.9%, P < .001) and had an increased incidence of deep wound infections on univariate analysis (1.2% vs 0.3%, P = .002). There was no increased risk of superficial infection, medical complications, or thromboembolic events for the bilateral cohort.

Conclusions

Although bilateral THA recipients are younger with fewer preoperative comorbidities, bilateral THA is associated with an increased rate of transfusion in a nationwide setting. With this knowledge, specific interventions should be instituted to target these procedure-specific risks.

Simultaneous or Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty? An Analysis of Complications in 14,460 Patients Using National Data

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SimBTHA) is often performed in younger, fitter patients with bilateral hip disease. If patients are deemed not suitable for SimBTHA due to concurrent comorbidity, it may be more appropriate to perform staged bilateral total hip arthroplasties (StBTHAs) 3-6 months apart to minimize complications and morbidity. Complication rates following hip arthroplasty are low and large national datasets are helpful for assessing these rare events. We aimed at comparing SimBTHA vs StBTHA in order to determine any differences in morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics data for all patients who underwent bilateral THAs in the English National Health Service between April 2005 and July 2014 were obtained. Patients were grouped into SimBTHAs (same day) or staged, with the second THA occurring between 3 and 6 months after the first. Medical and surgical complications were compared and total length of stay was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 2507 underwent SimBTHAs and 9915 had StBTHAs. SimBTHA patients were significantly younger (60.6 vs 65.5 years, P < .001) and more likely to be male, but had similar Charlson comorbidity scores. Compared to StBTHAs, patients undergoing SimBTHAs had a greater risk of pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, renal failure, chest infection, and inhospital death. Patients undergoing SimBTHAs had a significantly shorter overall hospital stay (8.9 vs 10.4 days). Patients undergoing SimBTHA at high-volume units had a lower average Charlson score and subsequent complication rate than low-volume units.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the greater risks of SimBTHA in patients with Charlson score greater than 0 performed at lower-volume centers in England.

Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty: When Is It Safe to Operate the Second Hip? A Systematic Review

Introduction

Patients with degenerative hip disease frequently present with bilateral involvement that requires surgical management. The main goal when treating these patients is to achieve the maximum efficiency without increasing risk of perioperative complications; therefore, the decision regarding the best moment to operate the second hip becomes relevant. Although studies have addressed this topic, whether a simultaneous or staged surgery should be performed remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on available evidence, the optimum strategy in terms of safety to operate the second hip in patients with bilateral involvement.

Materials and Methods

A meta-analysis was planned. A systematic review of the literature was performed including clinical trials or observational analytical studies comparing the safety of bilateral arthroplasty performed simultaneously or staged by measuring major and minor complications. The appropriateness of a meta-analysis was evaluated through the detailed analysis of the risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies.

Results

Thirteen studies were selected after the systematic review. A wide variability in the methodological designs was found with a critical risk of bias in most of them. Considerable heterogeneity was detected in defining staged surgery in the cointerventions and how the outcomes were defined and measured. In response to these findings, a meta-analysis was considered not appropriate. The results showed no differences in the risk of mortality or systemic complications in young and healthy patients between simultaneous or staged surgeries. However, increased risk of complications for staged surgeries performed during the same hospitalization was observed.

Conclusions

Available evidence is very heterogeneous and the quality of evidence is low. The available evidence supports the performance of simultaneous hip arthroplasty in selected patients (not older than 65 years, ASA 1-2, without cardiovascular comorbidities) and suggests the avoidance of staged surgeries within the same hospitalization.

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties in nonagenarians

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective and durable treatment option for hip osteoarthritis (OA). As life expectancy continues to increase, so too will the demand for joint arthroplasty in the 10th decade of life, frequently in cases involving osteoarthritis of both hips. Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) is a valuable therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients with bilateral degenerative hip disease, although its use in the very elderly is poorly reported on in the literature. A case of bilateral hip OA successfully treated with SBTHA in a nonagenarian is presented and the literature is reviewed.