Combining a liquid-liquid extraction with successive air assisted liquid-liquid microextraction for the analysis of phytosterols present in animal based butter and oil samples

Recent modified air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction applications for medicines and organic compounds in various samples: A review

Air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction (AALLME) is a procedure for sample preparation that has high recoveries and high preconcentration factors while using a small amount of extractants. This procedure has gained widespread acceptance among scientists due to a variety of advantages, including its easiness, being cheap, green, and available in most laboratories. The current review has focused on the analysis of medicines and organic compounds using various modes of AALLME. The use of various extractants and support factors were developed in many modes of AALLME. A review of literature revealed that the procedure is used as a powerful and efficient approach for extracting medicals and organic compounds. This review explained 12 different types of AALLME methods. The findings on the modifications of AALLME modes that have been published are summarized. Future directions are also being discussed.

Comparison of organic and deep eutectic solvents based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the analysis of phytosterols in cow milk combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector

In the present work, a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction approach has been developed for extraction of four phytosterols (stigmasterol, β-sitosterol, campesterol, and brassicasterol) from cow milk samples using organic and deep eutectic solvents and the results were critically compared. The extracted analytes were determined using high performance liquid chromatography. In the developed method, carbon tetrachloride and choline chloride:p-chlorophenol deep eutectic solvent were selected to use as the best extraction solvent. Effective parameters and validation data were studied for both methods, independently. Under optimum conditions, limits of detection and quantification were within the ranges of 0.3-0.9 and 1.0-3.0 ng/mL for organic solvent based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and 0.09-0.32 and 0.3-1.0 ng/mL for deep eutectic solvent based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, respectively. Good coefficient of determinations and relative standard deviations obtained for the methods were ≥0.994 and ≤7.6%, respectively. The introduced method was performed on different milk samples for the determination of target analytes using both solvents and the results were analyzed statistically by the t-test.