Spinal sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; a comparative study

Change of Clinical and Radiologic Parameters after Minimally Invasive Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Study with Long-term Follow-up

BACKGROUND

 The impact of minimally invasive decompression (MID) techniques on spinopelvic parameters and on the sagittal alignment remains a controversial topic. Here we studied the changes in clinical and radiologic parameters and their relationships in a series of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) submitted to MID with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 24 months.

METHODS

 We prospectively collected clinical and radiologic data of 20 consecutive patients who were evaluated preoperatively, at the 6-month FU, and at the 24-month FU. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), neck disability index (NDI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C7 slope (C7S), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were assessed for each patient. Moreover, the percentage variation of clinical and radiologic factors at the 24-month FU compared with the preoperative factors was calculated to perform correlation studies among these variables.

RESULTS

 We reported a significant improvement of all clinical parameters. A significant increase of LL and SS and a significant decrease of PT and SVA were observed. The preoperative values of ODI, LL, SS, PT, and SVA significantly affect the 24-month FU values, and the percentage improvement of SVA at the 24-month FU compared with the preoperative values was significantly related to the percentage improvement of LL.

CONCLUSIONS

 MID is clinically effective in patients with LSS and improves the spinopelvic parameters and the global sagittal balance of the spine. The preoperative spinal alignment affects the spinal alignment at FU. The improvement of SVA was strictly related to the improvement of LL.

The role of muscle degeneration and spinal balance in the pathophysiology of lumbar spinal stenosis: Study protocol of a translational approach combining in vivo biomechanical experiments with clinical and radiological parameters

OBJECTIVE

To describe a study protocol for investigating the functional association between posture, spinal balance, ambulatory biomechanics, paraspinal muscle fatigue, paraspinal muscle quality and symptoms in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (sLSS) before and 1-year after elective surgical intervention.

DESIGN

Single-centre prospective, experimental, multimodal (clinical, biomechanical, radiological) study with three instances of data collection: baseline (study visit 1), 6-month follow-up (remote) and 1-year follow-up (study visit 2). Both study visits include an in vivo experiment aiming to elicit paraspinal muscle fatigue for postural assessment in a non-fatigued and fatigued state.

EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL

At baseline and 1-year follow-up, 122 patients with sLSS will be assessed clinically, perform the back-performance scale assessment and complete several patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) questionnaires regarding overall health, disease-related symptoms and kinesiophobia. Posture and biomechanical parameters (joint kinematics, kinetics, surface electromyography, back curvature) will be recorded using an optoelectronic system and retroreflective markers during different tasks including overground walking and movement assessments before and after a modified Biering-Sørensen test, used to elicit paraspinal muscle fatigue. Measurements of muscle size and quality and the severity of spinal stenosis will be obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sagittal postural alignment data from EOS radiographies. After each study visit, physical activity level will be assessed during 9 days using a wrist-worn activity monitor. In addition, physical activity level and PROMs will be assessed remotely at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The multimodal set of data obtained using the study protocol described in this paper will help to expand our current knowledge on the pathophysiology, biomechanics, and treatment outcome of degenerative sLSS. The results of this study may contribute to defining and/or altering patient treatment norms, surgery indication criteria and post-surgery rehabilitation schedules.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was approved by the regional ethics committee and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05523388).

The Difference in Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and the Correlation with Health-Related Quality of Life among Healthy Individuals, Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

(1) Background: Paraspinal muscle degeneration affects the quality of life in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We aimed to describe the characteristics and differences in the paraspinal muscle parameters between patients with DLS and LSS and investigate their correlation with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). (2) Methods: There were forty-four participants in each group, namely the DLS, LSS, and healthy groups, who were matched at a ratio of 1:1 according to age, sex, and BMI. Differences in paraspinal muscle parameters among the three groups were compared using analysis of variance or the Mann-Whitney U test, and paraspinal muscle degeneration and HRQOL were analyzed using Spearman's correlation analysis. (3) Results: In the upper lumbar, the psoas (PS), quadratus lumborum (QL), and multifidus (MF) cross-sectional area (CSA) in the DLS group were smaller than those in the other groups. In the lower lumbar region, the CSA of the PS, QL, erector spinae (ES), and gross CSA (GCSA) of the MF in the DLS group were not significantly different from those in the LSS group. These values were lower than those observed in the healthy group. The lean muscle fat index (LMFI) of the MF and ES groups was higher than those of the other groups. Regarding HRQOL, we found that PS and MF CSA were strongly associated with HRQOL in healthy individuals; however, only MF was associated with HRQOL in the LSS group. (4): Conclusion: PS in the upper lumbar region and MF degeneration were more severe in patients with DLS than in those with LSS. ES degeneration was similar between the LSS and DLS groups. MF muscle atrophy in patients with LSS and asymmetric changes in the MF in DLS are associated with quality of life.

Wide anatomical variability of PI normative values within an asymptomatic population: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Studies on sagittal alignment parameters have solely focused on patients with preexisting spinal deformity. Limited data in the literature have analyzed pelvic incidence (PI) values in an asymptomatic patient population. The purpose of this study was to: (1) systematically review the literature to analyze normative PI values in asymptomatic patients; and (2) provide a more definitive geometric measurement guide for determining surgical interventions.

METHODS

A systematic review of retrospective studies was performed by searching PubMed to identify studies that analyzed PI measurements in asymptomatic subjects. The following search phrases were used: (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal alignment, radiograph, asymptomatic, normative values, and adults) using Boolean operators AND, OR and NOT. Patients with pathology involving the osseous pelvic anatomy (including fracture, infection, tumor, previous surgery, and lumbosacral fusion) that would prevent measurement of the selected parameters were not included. Pelvic incidence (PI) values were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies met inclusion criteria, including 3629 asymptomatic subjects who underwent standing lateral radiographs (mean age, 41.1 years; range, 24-69 years) for the purposes of analyzing pelvic incidence values. Overall, the mean PI value was 50.0° (range, 24-69) which is consistent with reported values in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Wide anatomical variability and broad clinical interpretation of PI normative values do little to guide surgical planning for successful outcomes. However, this systematic review has presented PI-stratified normative values in a large sample of asymptomatic subjects which can serve as a grounded geometric reference for spine surgeons when considering surgical intervention approaches.

MRI grading of spinal stenosis is not associated with the severity of low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Background

Although lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) often coexists with other degenerative conditions, few studies have fully assessed possible contributing factors for low back pain (LBP) in patients with LSS. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the severity of LBP in patients with LSS.

Methods

The patients with neurogenic claudication caused by LSS, which was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this cross-sectional study. Data included ratings of LBP, buttock and leg pain, and numbness on a numerical rating scale (NRS), 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) scores, muscle mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and radiographic measurements including lumbopelvic alignment and slippage. The severity of LSS, endplate defects, Modic endplate changes, intervertebral disc degeneration, and facet joint osteoarthritis were evaluated on MRI. Spearman correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to examine the factors associated with the severity of LBP (NRS score).

Results

A total of 293 patients (135 male and 158 female, average age 72.6 years) were analyzed. LBP was moderately correlated with buttock and leg pain, and buttock and leg numbness. Significant but weak correlations were observed between LBP and body mass index, appendicular and trunk muscle mass, all domains of SF-36, pelvic tilt, total number of endplate defects and Modic endplate changes, and summary score of disc degeneration grading, but not severity or number of spinal stenoses. In the multivariate regression analysis, age, female sex, trunk muscle mass, diabetes, NRS buttock and leg pain, NRS buttock and leg numbness, SF-36 vitality, pelvic tilt, and total number of endplate defects were associated with the severity of LBP.

Conclusions

Trunk muscle mass, lumbopelvic alignment, and endplate defects, but not severity of stenosis are partly associated with severity of LBP, but buttock and leg pain and buttock and leg numbness have strongest relationships with LBP in patients with LSS.

Correlations between paraspinal extensor muscle endurance and clinical outcomes in preoperative LSS patients and clinical value of an endurance classification

Background

Few study has investigated how paraspinal muscle endurance deteriorates in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients. In addition, little information is available on the relationship between clinical outcomes and the endurance of paraspinal muscles.

Objective

To explore the correlation between paraspinal extensor muscle endurance, quality of life (QOL) and sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Besides, we attempted to propose a paraspinal extensor muscle endurance test (PEMET) classification for identifying the severity of clinical symptoms and sagittal imbalance in LSS patients.

Methods

171 hospitalized LSS patients and 100 healthy controls from the community were prospectively enrolled in this study. The paraspinal extensor endurance test was performed at baseline according to Ito test. The LSS patients were stratified into three groups based on the performance time of endurance test: grade I (<10s); grade II (10–60s); and grade III (>60s). Clinical measures of QOL included the visual analog scale scores (VAS) for back pain and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Sagittal alignment was analysed by standing posteroanterior and lateral whole spine X-ray in LSS patients.

Results

The LSS group had a significantly shorter performance time of the endurance test than the control group. The paraspinal muscle endurance significantly correlated with VAS-back, VAS-leg, ODI, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis (SVA; all p < 0.05). In binary logistic regression, the performance time of the endurance test was an independent factor of both poor functional status (ODI >40; p = 0.005, OR = 0.985) and global sagittal imbalance (SVA >50 mm; p = 0.019, OR = 0.985). Based on PEMET classification, moving from the grade III group to the grade I group, there was progressive worsening in VAS-back and ODI (all adjusted p < 0.05). Moreover, the grade I group had significantly greater VAS- leg, less LL and greater SVA than the other two groups (all adjusted p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Paraspinal muscle endurance was associated with QOL and sagittal spinopelvic alignment in LSS patients. A PEMET classification system has been constructed and has shown a correlation with QOL and sagittal imbalance.

Translational potential statement

The PEMET classification system proposed in this study could be available for identifying the severity of clinical symptoms and sagittal imbalance during preoperative evaluation in LSS patients.

Relationships between Paraspinal Muscle and Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationships between measurements of paraspinal muscle and spinopelvic sagittal parameters and the predictive value of lumbar indentation value (LIV) on sagittal balance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

It was a retrospective study. We collected the data of 110 patients, who were diagnosed as lumbar spinal stenosis from December 2018 to May 2019. The total cross-sectional area (tCSA), functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), and fatty infiltration (FI) of paraspinal muscle were measured. The spinopelvic sagittal parameters were also measured, including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and PI minus LL (PI-LL). Correlations between measurements of paraspinal muscle and sagittal parameters were investigated by Pearson correlation analysis. The multiple linear regression analysis was used to investigate the LIV, age, gender, and BMI for assessing spinopelvic sagittal balance. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find out the most optimum cut-off point of LIV for evaluating SVA.

RESULTS

There were 42 males and 68 females in this study and the mean age was 59.9 ± 10.9 years old. By Pearson correlation analysis, MF tCSA showed significant association with LL (r = 0.455, P < 0.01) and PI-LL (r = -0.286, P < 0.01). MF fCSA had a significant correlation with LL (r = 0.326, P < 0.01) and PI-LL (r = -0.209, P < 0.05). LIV was also significantly correlated to spinopelvic sagittal parameters, including SVA (r = -0.226, P < 0.05), LL (r = 0.576, P < 0.01), TK (r = 0.305, P < 0.01), and PI-LL (r = -0.379, P < 0.01). By multiple linear regression analysis, LIV was independently associated with sagittal parameters, including PI-LL and SVA. The cut-off value of LIV for SVA ≤ 50 mm was 10.5 mm (AUC = 0.641). According to the best cut-off value, patients were divided into two groups. For patients with LIV ≤ 10.5 mm, the percentage of SVA ≤ 50 mm was 54.5% (18/33), while it was 83.1% (64/77) for patients with LIV >10.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

As a new index to evaluate paraspinal muscle atrophy, the LIV was independently correlated to spinopelvic sagittal balance. Degeneration of paraspinal muscle was associated with spinopelvic sagittal balance.

Dynamic global sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Analysis of the effects of decompression surgery on gait adaptations

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads patients to adapt their posture and walking parameters. Pelvic retroversion might be a compensation mechanism of pain. Pelvic and lower limbs compensations during gait are still not precisely understood, as well as the effect of a surgical decompression on them. These dynamic parameters can be studied through three-dimensional gait analysis.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is the dynamic pelvic tilt modified after decompression surgery in LSS patients compared to asymptomatic subjects?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

50 asymptomatic subjects (C-group) and 37 patients operated on for lumbar decompression underwent a three-dimensional gait analysis one month before (M0) and six months after (M6) the surgery. 3D gait analysis was performed and hip and knee flexion, trunk kinematics, walking speed, stride length and pelvic tilt during gait or dynamic pelvic tilt (dPT) were recorded. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogic Scales (VAS)) and radiological assessment were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean values of maximum and minimum dPT in the LSS-group preoperatively were significantly higher compared to the C-group (respectively 10.9 (6.2)° versus 7.3 (5.6)°, p = 0.003; 7.7 (6.1)° versus 4.8 (5.8)°, p = 0.011), and were significantly lowered at M6 (respectively 10.9 (6.2)° versus 8.1 (4.8)°, p = 0.0087; and 7.7 (6.1)° versus 5.1 (4.7)°, p = 0.012), and became similar to the C-group. The dPT range of motion at M0 and M6 were similar, and were both significantly higher than control values. Mean values of maximum and minimum hip flexion were significantly higher at M0 compared to the C-group, and were significantly lowered at M6. No difference was found between the pre- and postoperative radiographic pelvic tilt. The VAS for lumbar pain, the VAS for radicular pain and the ODI were significantly decreased at M6.

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared to asymptomatic people, LSS patients walked with a pelvic anteversion, a hip flessum and a knee flessum before surgery, which tended to disappear after the surgical decompression. These differences were not noticed on static radiographs.

Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Asymptomatic Spondylotic Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Patients with Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

We performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for asymptomatic spondylotic cervical spinal stenosis (ASCSS) in the setting of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

A total of 114 patients with a diagnosis of LSS without cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy were grouped into ASCSS and non-ASCSS groups. The medical data and radiological parameters, including age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, symptom duration, redundant nerve roots, dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA), facet joint angle, lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), pelvic incidence (PI), Torg-Pavlov ratio, and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, were analyzed. The lumbar stenosis index and cervical stenosis index of the 114 patients were also analyzed.

RESULTS

ASCSS occurred in 70 of the 114 patients with LSS (61.4%). The two groups showed significant differences in symptom duration, redundant nerve roots, LLA, DCSA, and PI. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, an LLA >35.85° (P < 0.001) and a DCSA <84.50 mm² (P = 0.003) were independently associated with ASCSS. The multi-index receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve for predicted probability was 0.805 (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that cervical stenosis index significantly and positively correlated with the lumbar stenosis index (r = 0.430; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that an LLA >35.85° and a DCSA <84.50 mm² are risk factors for the development of ASCSS. For LSS patients with an enlarged LLA and reduced DSCA, a whole spinal magnetic resonance imaging examination should be performed.

Effect of lumbar laminectomy on spinal sagittal alignment: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Positive spinal sagittal alignment is known to correlate with pain and disability. The association between lumbar spinal stenosis and spinal sagittal alignment is less known, as is the effect of lumbar decompressive surgery on the change in that alignment. The objective was to study the evidence on the effect of lumbar decompressive surgery on sagittal spinopelvic alignment.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched in October 2019, unrestricted by date of publication. The study selection was performed by two independent reviewers. The risk of systematic bias was assessed according to the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. The data were extracted using a pre-defined standardized form.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 807 records. Of these, 18 were considered relevant for the qualitative analysis and 15 for the meta-synthesis. The sample size varied from 21 to 89 and the average age was around 70 years. Decompression was mostly performed on one or two levels and the surgical techniques varied widely. The pooled effect sizes were most statistically significant but small. For lumbar lordosis, the effect size was 3.0 (95% CI 2.2 to 3.7) degrees. Respectively, for pelvic tilt and sagittal vertical axis, the effect sizes were - 1.6 (95% CI .2.6 to - 0.5) degrees and - 9.6 (95% CI - 16.0 to - 3.3) mm.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that decompression may have a small, statistically significant but probably clinically insignificant effect on lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis and pelvic tilt.

Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain

Background

We determined the incidence and risk factors of low back pain (LBP) in patients with lumbar degenerative disease after single-level oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 120 lumbar degenerative disease patients who underwent single-level OLIF. We compared preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, including segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), disk height (DH), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years.

Results

Thirty-eight patients had postoperative LBP (VAS score for back pain ≥3; LBP group); the remaining 82 patients were in the non-LBP group. Age (P = 0.082), gender (P = 0.425), body mass index (P = 0.138), diagnosis (degenerative spondylolisthesis vs. lumbar spinal stenosis; P = 0.529), surgical level (P = 0.651), blood loss (P = 0.889), and operative time (P = 0.731) did not differ between the groups. In both groups, the ODI and VAS scores for back pain and leg pain significantly improved at the final follow-up compared with the preoperative scores (P = 0.003). Except for the VAS score for back pain (P = 0.000), none of the scores significantly differed between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). In the non-LBP group, LL, SL, DH, TK, and SS significantly improved, while PT and C7-SVA significantly decreased at the final follow-up as compared with the preoperative values. In both groups, DH significantly improved postoperatively, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.325). At the final follow-up, LL, PI-LL mismatch, PT, and C7-SVA showed significantly greater improvement in the non-LBP group than in the LBP group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified PT, PI-LL mismatch, and C7-SVA as significant risk factors for LBP after OLIF.

Conclusion

OLIF for single-level lumbar degenerative disease had satisfactory clinical outcomes. PT, PI-LL mismatch, and C7-SVA were significant risk factors for postoperative LBP. Patients with appropriately decreased PT, improved C7-SVA, and PI-LL match experienced less LBP.

Failure of Pelvic Compensation in Patients With Severe Positive Sagittal Imbalance: Comparison Between Static Radiographs and Gait Analysis of Spinopelvic Parameters in Adult Spinal Deformity and Lumbar Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study for motion analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare spinopelvic parameters using static radiographs with the values obtained using motion analysis during gait between adult spinal deformity (ASD) or lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It is still unclear whether measurement of radiological parameters using static radiographs can reflect natural sagittal balance during gait in the patients with severe positive sagittal imbalance.

METHODS

In this age- and sex-matched case control study, a total of 40 patients, each 20 subjects with either ASD or LSS who were scheduled to undergo surgery were included. Both clinical outcomes and sagittal spinopelvic parameters, including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured. In motion analysis during walking, the angle of anterior pelvic tilt and the angles of the pelvis, hip, and knee were estimated. The correlation between variables was analyzed.

RESULTS

On standing lateral x-rays, SVA, PT, and PI - LL were significantly higher in the ASD group while SS and LL were significantly lower in the ASD group. However, on motion analysis, the average mean anterior pelvic tilt ± SD values in the ASD group were 8.3 ± 10.7 and 8.5 ± 10.7 on the right and left, respectively, and were not different from matched values in the LSS group. A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a good agreement between the SS in the x-ray and anterior pelvic tilt in the motion analysis. In the ASD group, SS and SVA showed a significant positive correlation with mean anterior pelvic tilt in motion analysis during gait.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that the failure of pelvic compensation would likely occur in patients with severe positive sagittal imbalance during walking.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

One-Level or Multilevel Interbody Fusion for Multilevel Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Prospective Randomized Control Study with a 4-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The treatment of multilevel lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is complicated and challenging, and the optimal surgical strategy remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in clinical and radiologic outcomes and in complications after 1-level interbody fusion versus multilevel interbody fusion for the treatment of multilevel LDD.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with multilevel LDD were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the 1-level interbody fusion group or the multilevel interbody fusion group. Clinical and radiologic results and major complications in the 2 groups were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale for radicular and back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the short-form 36 physical score. Clinical status was assessed by the Whitecloud classification. Radiologic evaluation included assessment of lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical and radiologic results between the 2 groups. Procedure duration and intraoperative blood loss were significantly greater in the multilevel interbody fusion group than in the 1-level interbody fusion group; the multilevel interbody fusion group also had greater incidences of temporary nerve root palsy, wound infection, and adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSION

A hybrid technique including 1-level interbody fusion and multilevel posterolateral fusion is recommended for patients with multilevel LDD.

Clinical and radiological outcomes after decompression and posterior fusion in patients with degenerative scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of degenerative scoliosis (DS) increases with age and an overall increase is seen due to the aging population. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after decompression and posterior fusion in patients with DS.

METHODS

In this is prospective study, 43 patients with DS, aged 37 to 70 years, were eligible to undergo decompression and posterior fusion. Primary outcomes were low back pain (LBP) with or without radicular pain, which was evaluated preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months after surgery with the use of a visual analog scale (VAS), and the quality of life (QOL), which was assessed at the same time periods by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. The Cobb's method was used to measure the degree of scoliosis in each patient preoperatively and at 24 hours, 12 and 24 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

VAS scores improved significantly from a mean of 8.18 preoperatively to 4.48 at 12 months and 3.07 at 24 months postoperatively (P < .001). The mean radicular pain scores also decreased significantly (P < .001). At postoperative 12 months, the mean ODI score was significantly lower than the mean preoperative ODI score (47.81 ± 16.06 vs. 72.18 ± 12.28; P = .001). ODI score at 24 months postoperatively was significantly better than the preoperative ODI (15.53 ± 7.21 vs. 72.18 ± 12.28; P = .016). The mean Cobb angle changed significantly from 31.4° ± 4.88 preoperatively to 3.28° ± 2.10 at 24 months postoperatively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that decompression and posterior fusion in the patients with DS is an effective surgical method which is associated with satisfying clinical results in terms of improvement of postoperative LBP, radicular pain, and QOL, and correction of Cobb angle at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and restoration of sagittal alignment at 2 months postoperatively.

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar degenerative kyphosis

PURPOSE

Surgery is widely performed for lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK), but its effectiveness as compared with nonsurgical treatment has not been demonstrated.

METHODS

In this prospective study, surgical candidates with LDK were enrolled at three spine centres. Two treatment options were performed either surgery using a pedicle subtraction osteotomy or nonsurgical care. Outcomes were measured using a Visual analogue scale (VAS) of back pain as a primary endpoint, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and treatment-related complications.

RESULTS

Of the 126 LDK patients treated during the reference period, 97 patients were enrolled (47 in the surgical group and 50 in the nonsurgical group). Surgical group produced statistically reduced VAS of back pain and better functional outcomes than nonsurgical group since 12 months after treatment, but the rate of serious complications was higher after surgery. Interestingly, both surgical and nonsurgical groups had improved outcomes in terms of pain intensity and function at the 2-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery might be a preferred treatment option for LDK, but great caution is needed. And conservative treatment could be the considerable treatment option for LDK who is unwilling or has poor medical condition to operate.