1
|
Porreca A, Di Nicola M, Lucarelli G, Dorin VM, Soria F, Terracciano D, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Buonerba C, Cantiello F, Mari A, Minervini A, Veccia A, Antonelli A, Musi G, Hurle R, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Ferretti S, Perdonà S, Prete PD, Porreca A, Bove P, Crisan N, Russo GI, Damiano R, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Autorino R, Piccinelli M, Brescia A, Tătaru SO, Crocetto F, Giudice AL, de Cobelli O, Schips L, Ferro M, Marchioni M. Time to progression is the main predictor of survival in patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: Results from a machine learning-based analysis of a large multi-institutional database. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:69.e17-69.e25. [PMID: 38302296 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients affected by high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) progression to muscle invasive status is considered as the main indicator of local treatment failure. We aimed to investigate the effect of progression and time to progression on overall survival (OS) and to investigate their validity as surrogate endpoints. METHODS A total of 1,510 patients from 18 different institutions treated for T1 high grade NMIBC, followed by a secondary transurethral resection and BCG intravesical instillation. We relied on random survival forest (RSF) to rank covariates based on OS prediction. Cox's regression models were used to quantify the effect of covariates on mortality. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 49.0 months, 485 (32.1%) patients progressed to MIBC, while 163 (10.8%) patients died. The median time to progression was 82 (95%CI: 78.0-93.0) months. In RSF time-to-progression and age were the most predictive covariates of OS. The survival tree defined 5 groups of risk. In multivariable Cox's regression models accounting for progression status as time-dependent covariate, shorter time to progression (as continuous covariate) was associated with longer OS (HR: 9.0, 95%CI: 3.0-6.7; P < 0.001). Virtually same results after time to progression stratification (time to progression ≥10.5 months as reference). CONCLUSION Time to progression is the main predictor of OS in patients with high risk NMIBC treated with BCG and might be considered a coprimary endpoint. In addition, models including time to progression could be considered for patients' stratification in clinical practice and at the time of clinical trials design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Porreca
- Biostatistics Laboratory, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Biostatistics Laboratory, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vartolomei Mihai Dorin
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- CRTR Rare Tumors Reference Center, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Simone Ferretti
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Del Prete
- Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Robotic Urologic Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- Division of Urology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicolae Crisan
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Piccinelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Brescia
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabin Octavian Tătaru
- I.O.S.U.D., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Contieri R, Hensley PJ, Tan WS, Grajales V, Bree K, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Lee BH, Navai N, Dinney CP, Kamat AM. Oncological Outcomes for Patients with European Association of Urology Very High-risk Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin or Early Radical Cystectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:590-596. [PMID: 37558542 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European Urology Association (EAU) guidelines recommend immediate radical cystectomy (early RC) for patients with very high-risk (VHR) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) recommended only for those who refuse or are unfit for RC. OBJECTIVE To describe oncological outcomes following BCG or early RC in a contemporary cohort of patients with VHR NMIBC (EAU criteria). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients diagnosed with VHR NMIBC between 2000 and 2020 were identified from our institutional NMIBC registry. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Secondary outcomes were the progression rate and high-grade recurrence (HGR) rate for patients receiving BCG. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We identified 235 patients with VHR NMIBC, of whom 157 (67%) received BCG and 78 (33%) underwent early RC. The median follow-up was 52.8 mo. OS and CSM rates were 80.2% and 5.3% in the BCG group, and 88.1% and 4.9% in the early RC group, respectively with no significant difference in OS (p = 0.6) or CSM (p = 0.8) between the two groups. Among the patients treated with BCG, 5-yr HGR and progression rates were 41.9% and 17.4%, respectively; 39 patients (25%) underwent delayed RC after BCG. No significant difference in CSM emerged when comparing patients treated with delayed RC (after BCG) with those undergoing early RC (p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that intravesical BCG can be offered to patients as a resonable alternative to early RC for selected patients with VHR NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated outcomes for patients with very high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) versus early surgical removal of the bladder and found no differences in survival. We conclude that BCG could be offered to selected patients with this type of bladder cancer as a reasonable alternative to early bladder removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Wei Shen Tan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Valentina Grajales
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly Bree
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Byron H Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grabe-Heyne K, Henne C, Mariappan P, Geiges G, Pöhlmann J, Pollock RF. Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1170124. [PMID: 37333804 PMCID: PMC10272547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1170124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer ranks among the most common cancers globally. At diagnosis, 75% of patients have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients with low-risk NMIBC have a good prognosis, but recurrence and progression rates remain high in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, despite the decades-long availability of effective treatments for NMIBC such as intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The present review provides an overview of NMIBC, including its burden and treatment options, and then reviews aspects that counteract the successful treatment of NMIBC, referred to as unmet treatment needs. The scale and reasons for each unmet need are described based on a comprehensive review of the literature, including insufficient adherence to treatment guidelines by physicians because of insufficient knowledge, training, or access to certain therapy options. Low rates of lifestyle changes and treatment completion by patients, due to BCG shortages or toxicities and adverse events as well as their impact on social activities, represent additional areas of potential improvement. Highly heterogeneous evidence for the effectiveness and safety of some treatments limits the comparability of results across studies. As a result, efforts are underway to standardize treatment schedules for BCG, but intravesical chemotherapy schedules remain unstandardized. In addition, risk-scoring models often perform unsatisfactorily due to significant differences between derivation and real-world cohorts. Reporting in clinical trials suffers from a lack of consistent outcomes reporting in bladder cancer clinical trials, paired with an under-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in many trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valeri M, Contieri R, Fasulo V, Iuzzolino M, Cieri M, Elefante GM, De Carlo C, Bressan A, Saitta C, Gobbo A, Avolio PP, Dacrema V, Lazzeri M, Taverna G, Terracciano LM, Hurle R, Colombo P. Prospective Validation of the ROL System in Substaging pT1 High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Mono-Institutional Confirmatory Analysis in BCG Treated Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15. [PMID: 36765894 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with pT1 high-grade (HG) urothelial carcinoma (UC) and a very high risk of progression might benefit from immediate radical cystectomy (RC), but this option remains controversial. Validation of a standardized method to evaluate the extent of lamina propria (LP) invasion (with recognized prognostic value) in transurethral resection (TURBT) specimens is still needed. The Rete Oncologica Lombarda (ROL) system showed a high predictive value for progression after TURBT in recent retrospective studies. The ROL system was supposed to be validated on a large prospective series of primary urothelial carcinomas from a single institution. From 2016 to 2020, we adopted ROL for all patients with pT1 HG UC on TURBT. We employed a 1.0-mm threshold to stratify tumors in ROL1 and ROL2. A total of 222 pT1 HG UC were analyzed. The median age was 74 years, with a predominance of men (73.8%). ROL was feasible in all cases: 91 cases were ROL1 (41%), and 131 were ROL2 (59%). At a median follow-up of 26.9 months (IQR 13.8-40.6), we registered 81 recurrences and 40 progressions. ROL was a significant predictor of tumor progression in both univariable (HR 3.53; CI 95% 1.56-7.99; p < 0.01) and multivariable (HR 2.88; CI 95% 1.24-6.66; p = 0.01) Cox regression analyses. At Kaplan-Meier estimates, ROL showed a correlation with both PFS (p = 0.0012) and RFS (p = 0.0167). Our results confirmed the strong predictive value of ROL for progression in a large prospective series. We encourage the application of ROL for reporting the extent of LP invasion, substaging T1 HG UC, and improving risk tables for urological decision-making.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tappero S, Panunzio A, Hohenhorst L, Cano Garcia C, Barletta F, Piccinelli M, Tian Z, Parodi S, Antonelli A, Graefen M, Chun FKH, Briganti A, De Cobelli O, Saad F, Shariat SF, Suardi N, Borghesi M, Terrone C, Karakiewicz PI. Radical cystectomy in non-metastatic sarcomatoid bladder cancer: A direct comparison vs urothelial bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:271-7. [PMID: 36192262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effect of radical cystectomy (RC) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) is unclear in non-metastatic sarcomatoid bladder cancer (SBC) patients. We aimed to test the benefit of RC in SBC, and to perform a direct comparison vs urothelial bladder cancer (UCB). MATERIALS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER 2001-2018) all non-metastatic SBC and UBC patients were identified. Endpoint of interest was CSM. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, competing risks regression (CRR) analyses, three-months landmark analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed. All results were stratified according to organ-confined (OC: T2N0M0) vs non-organ-confined (NOC: T3-4N0M0 or TanyN1-3M0) stages. RESULTS Of 554 SBC patients, 49 vs 51% harbored OC vs NOC stages. Of 47,741 UBC patients, 62 vs 38% harbored OC vs NOC stages. RC rates were 33 vs 67% in OC vs NOC-SBC patients, and 40 vs 60% in OC vs NOC-UBC patients. After 1:1 PSM, comparison between RC vs no-RC was performed in OC-SBC (67 patients per group), OC-UBC (7611 patients per group), NOC-SBC (63 patients per group), and NOC-UBC patients (4644 patients per group). CRR hazard ratios associated with RC vs no-RC were 0.37 (p < 0.001) in OC-SBC vs 0.45 (p < 0.001) in OC-UBC, and 0.56 (p = 0.01) in NOC-SBC vs 0.68 (p < 0.001) in NOC-UBC. These results were replicated in sensitivity and landmark analyses. CONCLUSIONS The protective effect of RC vs no-RC is stronger in SBC than UBC patients, regardless of OC vs NOC stages.
Collapse
|
6
|
Duan H, Iagaru A. The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:45. [PMID: 36057766 PMCID: PMC9441085 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00481-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, oncological imaging techniques are advancing at a rapid pace, particularly molecular imaging with promising new targets for prostate cancer (PC) such as gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) along the established and indispensable prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). As PC is characterized by heterogenous tumor biology ranging from indolent to aggressive disease, distinguishing clinically significant tumors from indolent disease is critical. Multiparametric MRI- and PET-targeted prostate biopsies mitigate the shortcomings and risks of standard systematic template biopsy by identifying more significant cancers.Focal treatment for localized disease is a minimally invasive approach that targets the index tumor - the lesion of the highest grade - while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. Real-time MRI-guidance and thermal control with MR-thermometry, improves treatment accuracy and results in lower rates of functional side effects. PET imaging could be an useful tool to assess response to treatment compared to invasive prostate biopsies.In this comprehensive review, we focus on the image-guided detection and treatment of localized primary prostate cancer, its current status and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heying Duan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize a comprehensive overview of more recent evidence on micropapillary bladder cancer (MPBC), focusing on actual incidence, clinical features, therapeutic strategies, and prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS MPBC generally exhibits an aggressive behaviour compared with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC) with advances in tumour stage and nodal and distant spread at diagnosis. Due to its rarity and presence of only small sample size and retrospective studies, no consensus currently exists regarding the most effective therapeutic strategy to be performed among nonmuscle-invasive (conservative treatment versus immediate radical cystectomy) and muscle-invasive MPBC (neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront radical cystectomy versus adjuvant chemotherapy). SUMMARY The incidence of MPBC is recently increased according to latter literature, ranging from 2.9 to 7.6% of all bladder cancer. Despite its aggressive behaviour at time of presentation, more recent evidence fails to demonstrate a significant association between MPBC and worse outcomes compared with pUC when adjusted for clinical and pathological features. According to latter evidence, MPBC pathological response to NAC appears to be unsatisfactory compared with pUC patients while neoadjuvant immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab may represent an effective treatment among MPBC patients, based on PD-L1 and TMB expression.
Collapse
|
8
|
Soria F, Dutto D, Gontero P. Clinical and biological markers for risk-stratification of T1 high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2022; Publish Ahead of Print. [DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Cimadamore A, Lonati C, Di Trapani E, De Cobelli O, Rink M, Zamboni S, Simeone C, Soria F, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Afferi L, Mattei A, Carando R, Ornaghi PI, Tafuri A, Antonelli A, Karnes RJ, Colomer A, Sanchez-Salas R, Contieri R, Hurle R, Poyet C, Simone G, D'Andrea D, Shariat SF, Galfano A, Umari P, Francavilla S, Roumiguie M, Terrone C, Hendricksen K, Krajewski W, Buisan O, Laukhtina E, Xylinas E, Alvarez-Maestro M, Rouprêt M, Montironi R, Moschini M. Variant histologies in bladder cancer: Does the centre have an impact in detection accuracy? Urol Oncol 2022; 40:273.e11-273.e20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|