Efficacy and Toxicity Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0813 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Centrally Located Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Biologically effective dose (BED) value lower than 120 Gy improve outcomes in lung SBRT

BACKGROUND

Lung SBRT has a well-defined role in the treatment of patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who are not surgical candidates or refuse surgery. Biologically effective dose (BED) of greater than or equal to 100 Gy has been recommended. However, optimal fractionation remains unclear. Our objective was analyze patients treated with lung SBRT in our institution and evaluate outcomes according prescribed dose.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred nine patients with early non-small cell lung cancer and treated with lung SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. Differences between dose received, local control, and survival were evaluated. For comparison of BEDs, the prescribed dose for SBRT was stratified according to two groups: high (BED > 120 Gy) and low (BED < 120 Gy).

RESULTS

A relationship between mortality and total dose (54.7 Gy ± 4.8) was observed. Significantly worse survival was observed for patients with higher total doses (p < 0.003). It was found that patients receiving BED > 120 had increased mortality compared to patients receiving BED < 120 (p = 0.021). It was observed mean dose/fraction 12.6 Gy/f was a protective factor and decreased the probability of death.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that mean total dose lower 54 and a calculated BED < 120 Gy is the optimal. Further prospective data are needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal dose fractionation scheme as a function of tumor size and location of volume.

Survival analysis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC), but which patients benefit from stereotactic radiotherapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for early mortality.

METHODS

From August 2010 to 2022, 617 patients with medically inoperable, peripheral or central ES-NSCLC were treated with SABR at our institution. We retrospectively evaluated the data from 172 consecutive patients treated from 2018 to 2020 to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). The biological effective dose was > 100 Gy10 in all patients, and 60 Gy was applied in 3-5 fractions for a gross tumor volume (GTV) + 3 mm margin when the tumor diameter was < 1 cm; 30-33 Gy was delivered in one fraction. Real-time tumor tracking or an internal target volume approach was applied in 96% and 4% of cases, respectively. In uni- and multivariate analysis, a Cox model was used for the following variables: ventilation parameter FEV1, histology, age, T stage, central vs. peripheral site, gender, pretreatment PET, biologically effective dose (BED), and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI).

RESULTS

The median OS was 35.3 months. In univariate analysis, no correlation was found between OS and ventilation parameters, histology, PET, or centrality. Tumor diameter, biological effective dose, gender, and AACCI met the criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. The multivariate model showed that males (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; p = 0.05) and AACCI > 5 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.31; p = 0.026) were significant negative prognostic factors of OS. However, the analysis of OS showed that the significant effect of AACCI > 5 was achieved only after 3 years (3-year OS 37% vs. 56%, p = 0.021), whereas the OS in one year was similar (1-year OS 83% vs. 86%, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

SABR of ES-NSCLC with precise image guidance is feasible for all medically inoperable patients with reasonable performance status. Early deaths were rare in our real-life cohort, and OS is clearly higher than would have been expected after best supportive care.

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-Central Lung Tumor

Background and Objectives: Ultra-central (UC) lung tumors are defined as those abutting the proximal bronchial tree. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for UC tumors is difficult because of concerns about severe toxicities. Therefore, we report the safety and efficacy of moderate-intensity SBRT for UC tumors at our institution. Materials and Methods: From January 2017 to May 2021, we treated 20 patients with UC tumors with SBRT at a dose of 45-60 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median follow-up time was 15.8 months (range: 2.7-53.8 months). Ten of the 20 patients (50.0%) showed a complete response, five (25.0%) had a partial response, two (10.0%) had stable disease, and three (15.0%) showed progressive disease (PD). The response and disease control rates were 75.0% and 85.0%, respectively. Patients with PD showed local progression at median 8.3 months (range: 6.8-19.1 months) after SBRT. One-year and 2-year OS rates were 79.4% and 62.4%, respectively. One-year and 2-year LC rates are 87.1% and 76.2%, respectively. Eight patients died due to a non-radiation therapy related cause. One patient experienced grade 5 massive hemoptysis 6 months after SBRT, resulting in death. One patient experienced grade 2 esophageal pain and two experienced grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. Otherwise, no grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported. Conclusions: Moderate-intensity SBRT offers effective control of UC tumors and is a well-tolerated treatment for such tumors.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage IIA to IIIA Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial

PURPOSE

Larger tumors are underrepresented in most prospective trials on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed this phase 1 trial to specifically study the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SBRT for NSCLC >3 cm.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design (cohort A) with an expansion cohort at the MTD (cohort B) was used. Patients with inoperable NSCLC >3 cm (T2-4) were eligible. Select ipsilateral hilar and single-station mediastinal nodes were permitted. The initial SBRT dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions, with planned escalation to 50 and 60 Gy in 5 fractions. Adjuvant chemotherapy was mandatory for cohort A and optional for cohort B, but no patients in cohort B received chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was SBRT-related acute grade (G) 4+ or persistent G3 toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), distant metastases, disease progression, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median age was 80 years; tumor size was >3 cm and ≤5 cm in 20 (59%) and >5 cm in 14 patients (41%). In cohort A (n = 9), 3 patients treated to 50 Gy experienced G3 radiation pneumonitis (RP), thus defining the MTD. In the larger dose-expansion cohort B (n = 25), no radiation therapy-related G4+ toxicities and no G3 RP occurred; only 2 patients experienced G2 RP. The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF was 20.2%, distant failure was 34.7%, and disease progression was 54.4%. Two-year overall survival was 53%. A biologically effective dose (BED) <100 Gy was associated with higher LF (P = .006); advanced stage and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with greater disease progression (both P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty Gy in 5 fractions is the MTD for SBRT to tumors >3 cm. A higher BED is associated with fewer LFs even in larger tumors. Cohort B appears to have had less toxicity, possibly due to the omission of chemotherapy.

Measuring dose in lung identifies peripheral tumour dose inaccuracy in SBRT audit

PURPOSE

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours has become a mainstay of clinical practice worldwide. Measurements in anthropomorphic phantoms enable verification of patient dose in clinically realistic scenarios. Correction factors for reporting dose to the tissue equivalent materials in a lung phantom are presented in the context of a national dosimetry audit for SBRT. Analysis of dosimetry audit results is performed showing inaccuracies of common dose calculation algorithms in soft tissue lung target, inhale lung material and at tissue interfaces.

METHODS

Monte Carlo based simulation of correction factors for detectors in non-water tissue was performed for the soft tissue lung target and inhale lung materials of a modified CIRS SBRT thorax phantom. The corrections were determined for Gafchromic EBT3 Film and PTW 60019 microDiamond detectors used for measurements of 168 SBRT lung plans in an end-to-end dosimetry audit. Corrections were derived for dose to medium (Dm,m) and dose to water (Dw,w) scenarios.

RESULTS

Correction factors were up to -3.4% and 9.2% for in field and out of field lung respectively. Overall, application of the correction factors improved the measurement-to-plan dose discrepancy. For the soft tissue lung target, agreement between planned and measured dose was within average of 3% for both film and microDiamond measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The correction factors developed for this work are provided for clinical users to apply to commissioning measurements using a commercially available thorax phantom where inhomogeneity is present. The end-to-end dosimetry audit demonstrates dose calculation algorithms can underestimate dose at lung tumour/lung tissue interfaces by an average of 2-5%.

Evaluation of Automated Treatment Planning and Organ Dose Prediction for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

PURPOSES

To evaluate whether the auto-planning (AP) module can achieve clinically acceptable treatment plans for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to evaluate the effectiveness of a dose prediction model.

METHODS

Twenty lung SBRT cases planned manually with 50 Gy in five fractions were replanned using the Pinnacle (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, WI) AP module according to the dose constraint tables from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 protocol. Doses to the organs at risk (OAR) were compared between the manual and AP plans. Using a dose prediction model from a commercial product, PlanIQ (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL), we also compared OAR doses from AP plans with predicted doses.

RESULTS

All manual and AP plans achieved clinically required dose coverage to the target volumes. The AP plans achieved equal or better OAR sparing when compared to the manual plans, most noticeable in the maximum doses of the spinal cord, ipsilateral brachial plexus, esophagus, and trachea. Predicted doses to the heart, esophagus, and trachea were highly correlated with the doses of these OARs from the AP plans with the highest correlation coefficient of 0.911, 0.823, and 0.803, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Auto-planning for lung SBRT improved OAR sparing while keeping the same dose coverage to the tumor. The dose prediction model can provide useful planning dose guidance.

Safety and efficacy of 10-fraction hypofractionated radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To investigate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at our institution.

Materials and Methods

From May 2007 to December 2018, HFRT was used to treat 68 lesions in 64 patients who were unsuitable for SBRT because of central tumor location, large tumor size, or contiguity with the chest wall. The HFRT schedule included a dose of 50–70 Gy delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was freedom from local progression (FFLP), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and toxicities.

Results

The median follow-up period was 25.5 months (range, 5.3 to 119.9 months). The FFLP rates were 79.8% and 67.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS rates were 82.8% and 64.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. A larger planning target volume was associated with lower FFLP (p = 0.023). Dose escalation was not associated with FFLP (p = 0.964). Four patients (6.3%) experienced grade 3–5 pulmonary toxicities. Tumor location, central or peripheral, was not associated with either grade 3 or higher toxicity.

Conclusion

HFRT with 50–70 Gy in 10 fractions demonstrated acceptable toxicity; however, the local control rate can be improved compared with the results of SBRT. More studies are required in patients who are unfit for SBRT to investigate the optimal fractionation scheme.

Clinical Outcome of CT-Guided Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy for Unresectable Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

Objective

To analyze the efficacy and safety of low dose rate stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (L-SABT) for treatment of unresectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Data of patients with early-stage NSCLC who received CT-guided L-SABT (radioactive I-125 seeds implantation) at eight different centers from December 2010 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment efficacy and complications were evaluated.

Results

A total of 99 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up duration was 46.3 months (6.1-119.3 months). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year local control rates were 89.1%, 77.5%, and 75.7%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.7%, 70.1%, and 54.4%, respectively. Treatment failure occurred in 38.4% of patients. Local/regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and recurrence combined with metastasis accounted for 15.1%, 12.1%, and 11.1%, respectively. Pneumothorax occurred in 47 patients (47.5%) with 19 cases (19.2%) needing closed drainage. The only radiation-related adverse reaction was two cases of grade 2 radiation pneumonia. KPS 80-100, T1, the lesion was located in the left lobe, GTV D90 ≥150 Gy and the distance between the lesion and chest wall was < 1 cm, were associated with better local control (all P < 0.05); on multivariate analysis KPS, GTV D90, and the distance between the lesion and chest wall were independent prognostic factors for local control (all P < 0.05). KPS 80-100, T1, GTV D90 ≥150 Gy, and the distance between the lesion and chest wall was < 1 cm were also associated with better survival (all P < 0.05); on multivariate analysis KPS, T stage, and GTV D90 were independent prognostic factors for survival (all P < 0.05). The incidence of pneumothorax in patients with lesions <1 cm and ≥1cm from the chest wall was 33.3% and 56.7%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.026).

Conclusion

L-SABT showed acceptable efficacy in the treatment of unresectable early-stage NSCLC. But the incidence of pneumothorax is high. For patients with T1 stage and lesions <1 cm from the chest wall, it may have better efficacy. Prescription dose greater than 150 Gy may bring better results.

Can reducing planning safety margins broaden the inclusion criteria for lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is currently indicated for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Advancements in image-guidance technology continue to improve treatment precision and enable reductions in planning safety margins. We investigated the dosimetric benefits of margin reduction, its potential to extend SABR to more NSCLC patients and the factors influencing plan acceptability.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 61 patients (stage IA-IIIA) treated with conventional radiotherapy. Patients were ineligible for SABR due to tumour size or proximity to organs at risk (OAR). Using Pinnacle auto-planning, three SABR plans were generated for each patient: a regular planning target volume margin plan, a reduced margin plan (gross tumour volume GTV+3 mm) and a non-margin plan. Targets were planned to 48Gy/4 or 50Gy/5 fractions depending on location. Plans were compared in terms of target coverage, OAR doses and dosimetric acceptability based on local guidelines. Predictors of acceptability were investigated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to regular margin plans, both reduced margin and non-margin plans resulted in significant reductions to almost all dose constraints. Dose conformity was significantly worse in non-margin plans (P < 0.05) and strongly correlated with targets' surface area/volume ratio (R2  = 0.9, P < 0.05). 26% of reduced margin plans were acceptable, compared to 54% of non-margin plans. GTV overlap with OARs significantly affected plan acceptability (OR 0.008, 95% CI 0.001-0.073).

CONCLUSION

Margin reduction significantly reduced OAR doses enabling acceptable plans to be achieved for patients previously excluded from SABR. Indications for lung SABR may broaden as treatment accuracy continues to improve; further work is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit.

Ultra-central lung tumors: safety and efficacy of protracted stereotactic body radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

For patients with early stage or medically inoperable lung cancer, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a general accepted and effective treatment option. The role of SBRT in ultra-central tumors remains controversial. The aim of this single-center retrospective analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protracted SBRT with 60 Gy in 12 fractions (with a biological effective dose (BED₁₀) of 90-150 Gy) for patients with ultra-central lung tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated in our institution with 60 Gy in 12 fractions from January 2012 until April 2020 were included. Ultra-central tumors were defined as planning target volume (PTV) abutting or overlapping the main bronchi and/or trachea and/or esophagus. Data regarding patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related characteristics were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients met the criteria for ultra-central tumor location. The PTV abutted the main bronchus, trachea or esophagus in 79%, 22% and 28% of cases, respectively. At a median follow-up of 19 months, 1- and 2-year local control rates were 98% and 85%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 77% and 52%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 21%, of which 10 patients (14% of total) died of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage. A significant difference between patients with or without grade ≥3 toxicity was found for the mean dose (D_mean) to the main bronchus (p = 0.003), where a D_mean BED₃ of ≥91 Gy increased the risk of grade ≥3 toxicity significantly.

DISCUSSION

A protracted SBRT regimen of 60 Gy in 12 fractions for ultra-central lung tumors leads to high local control rates with toxicity rates similar to previous series, but with substantial risk of fatal bronchopulmonary hemorrhage. Therefore, possible risk factors of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage such as dose to the main bronchus should be taken into account.

Late Toxicity and Long-Term Local Control in Patients With Ultra-Central Lung Tumours Treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy With Homogenous Dose Prescription

AIMS

To report late toxicity and long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with SABR for ultra-central tumours between May 2008 and April 2016. Ultra-central location was defined as tumour (GTV) abutting or involving trachea, main or lobar bronchi. Respiratory motion management and static-field dynamic-IMRT were used, with dose prescribed homogeneously (maximum <120%). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-five per cent of patients had inoperable primary non-small cell lung cancer and 35% had lung oligometastases. The median age was 72 (range 34-85) years. The median gross tumour volume and planning target volume (PTV) were 19.6 (range 1.7-203.3) cm³ and 57.4 (range 7.7-426.6) cm³, respectively. The most commonly used dose fractionation was 60 Gy in eight fractions (n = 51, 87.8%). Median BED₁₀ for D98%PTV and D2%PTV were 102.6 Gy and 115.06 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26.5 (range 3.2-100.5) months, fatal haemoptysis occurred in five patients (8.7%), of which two were directly attributable to SABR. A statistically significant difference was identified between median BED₃ for 4 cm³ of airway, for patients who developed haemoptysis versus those who did not (147.4 versus 47.2 Gy, P = 0.005). At the last known follow-up, 50 patients (87.7%) were without local recurrence. Freedom from local progression at 2 and 4 years was 92 and 79.8%, respectively. The median overall survival was 34.3 (95% confidence interval 6.1-61.6) months. Overall survival at 2 and 4 years was 55.1 and 41.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with high-risk ultra-central lung tumours, IMRT-based SABR with homogenous dose prescription achieves high local control, similar to that reported for peripheral tumours. Although fatal haemoptysis occurred in 8.7% of patients, a direct causality with SABR was evident in only 3%. Larger studies are warranted to ascertain factors associated with outcomes, especially toxicity, and identify patients who would probably benefit from this treatment.

Local Control After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Numerous dose and fractionation schedules have been used to treat medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy. We evaluated published experiences with SBRT to determine local control (LC) rates as a function of SBRT dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred sixty published articles reporting LC rates after SBRT for stage I NSCLC were identified. Quality of the series was assessed by evaluating the number of patients in the study, homogeneity of the dose regimen, length of follow-up time, and reporting of LC. Clinical data including 1, 2, 3, and 5-year tumor control probabilities for stages T1, T2, and combined T1 and T2 as a function of the biological effective dose were fitted to the linear quadratic, universal survival curve, and regrowth models.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies met inclusion criteria. As measured by the goodness of fit χ2/ndf, with ndf as the number of degrees of freedom, none of the models were ideal fits for the data. Of the 3 models, the regrowth model provides the best fit to the clinical data. For the regrowth model, the fitting yielded an α-to-β ratio of approximately 25 Gy for T1 tumors, 19 Gy for T2 tumors, and 21 Gy for T1 and T2 combined. To achieve the maximal LC rate, the predicted physical dose schemes when prescribed at the periphery of the planning target volume are 43 ± 1 Gy in 3 fractions, 47 ± 1 Gy in 4 fractions, and 50 ± 1 Gy in 5 fractions for combined T1 and T2 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Early-stage NSCLC is radioresponsive when treated with SBRT or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy. A steep dose-response relationship exists with high rates of durable LC when physical doses of 43-50 Gy are delivered in 3 to 5 fractions.

The development and external validation of an overall survival nomogram in medically inoperable centrally located early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Current nomograms predicting survival prognosis after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are based on peripherally located tumors. However, patients with a central lung tumor tend to be older, the tumor is often larger and fraction-schedules are risk-adapted. Therefore, we developed and externally validated a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) in patients having centrally located early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent SBRT for centrally located NSCLC were identified and baseline characteristics were obtained. A nomogram was built to predict 6-month, 1-, 2- and 3-year OS using Cox proportional hazards model. The model building procedure was validated using bootstrap sampling. To determine generalizability, external validation was performed on a cohort of patients with central NSCLC treated with SBRT from another center. Discriminatory ability was measured with the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots were used to compare Kaplan-Meier-estimated and nomogram-predicted OS.

RESULTS

The nomogram was built on data of 220 patients and consisted of the following variables: PTV, age, WHO performance status, tumor lobe location and ultracentral location. The C-index of the nomogram (corrected for optimism) was moderate at 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.69). Calibration plots showed favorable predictive accuracy. The external validation showed acceptable validity with a C-index of 0.62 (95% CI 0.61-0.64).

DISCUSSION

We developed and externally validated the first nomogram to estimate the OS-probability in patients with centrally located NSCLC treated with SBRT. This nomogram is based on 5 patient and tumor characteristics and gives an individualized survival prediction.

The Role of Radiation Therapy in the Older Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Older patients represent a unique subgroup of the cancer patient population for which the role of radiation therapy (RT) requires special consideration. This review will discuss many of these considerations as well as various radiation treatment techniques in the context of a variety of disease sites.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies give insight into the management of older cancer patients considering their age, performance status, comorbid conditions, quality of life, genetics, cost, and individual goals. RT plays an evolving and pivotal role in providing optimal care for this population. Recent advances in RT technique allow for more precise treatment delivery and reduced toxicity. Studies evaluating the use of radiation therapy in breast, brain, lung, prostate, rectal, pancreatic, esophageal, and oligometastatic cancer are summarized and discussed in the context of treating the older patient population. Individual age, performance and functional status, comorbid conditions, and patients' objectives and goals should all be considered when presenting treatment options for older patients and age alone should not disqualify patients from curative intent treatments. When possible, hypofractionated courses should be utilized as outcomes are often equivalent and toxicities are reduced. In many cases, RT may be preferable to other treatment options due to decreased toxicity profile and acceptable disease control.

Nodal recurrences after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Lobectomy is considered the standard of care for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer. However, for those patients who remain unfit to undergo surgery due to advanced age, poor performance status, comorbidities, poor pulmonary reserve or a combination of these are now treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Due to its noninvasive nature, lower cost, lower toxicity, reduced recovery time and equivalent efficacy, even medically operable patients are attracted to the option of SBRT despite the lack of level I evidence. Thus, studying the incidence and patterns of recurrence after SBRT help in understanding the magnitude of the problem, risk factors associated with the different patterns of recurrence, and aid in devising strategies to prevent them in future. Nodal recurrences are not uncommon after SBRT and can potentially lead to further seeding for distant metastases and ultimately poor survival. This review is aimed at reviewing the published data on the incidence of nodal recurrences after SBRT and compare it to surgery, identify potential risk factors for recurrence, salvage treatment options and prevention strategies.

Ultra-central Thoracic Re-irradiation Using 10-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Recurrent Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tumors: Preliminary Toxicity and Efficacy Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We report our clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors with ultra-central (UC) location treated with hypofractionated 10-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (hSBRT) in the context of thoracic re-irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted from 2009 to 2017 on 20 patients with recurrent NSCLC from previous thoracic radiation treatment who underwent hSBRT to 21 total UC located recurrent tumors. The planning target volumes (PTVs) that overlapped with previous treatment fields (within the 50% isodose line) were included in this analysis with endpoints of overall survival, tumor control, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 17.8 months. The median total dose of hSBRT and total biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) were 65 Gy and 107.25 Gy, respectively. The median time from previous treatment was 14.6 months. The 1-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 68%, 35%, and 83%, respectively. The median time to local progression was 13.3 months. The most common toxicity was grade 2 or above pneumonitis (35%). One patient, whose tumor was abutting the esophagus, experienced grade 3 esophagitis. Two (10%) patients died from "unlikely" treatment-related hemorrhage from local tumor progression at 10 and 24 months after hSBRT. Bronchoscopic evaluation of 1 patient suggested endobronchial tumor progression, and clear radiographic evidence of treated hilar tumor progression was documented in the second patient's case.

CONCLUSION

Despite having a high-risk population with recurrent ultra-central NSCLC tumors in the setting of re-irradiation, our results demonstrate that ablative doses of hSBRT may serve as a feasible option for these challenging cases and concur with current reported literature.

Outpatient Anesthesia Facilitates Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Lung Cancer Patients With Advanced Cognitive Impairments

Purpose

To report on the use of outpatient anesthesia (OPA) facilitating delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with severe cognitive impairments (CI) diagnosed with inoperable early stage lung cancer.

Methods and Materials

We surveyed our institutional review board-approved prospective lung SBRT data registry to document the feasibility of using anesthesia in CI patients and to determine their SBRT outcomes.

Results

From 2004 to 2018, 8 from a total 2084 patients were identified for this analysis. The median age at treatment was 68 years (range, 44-78). Most patients were female (62.5%). CI diagnoses included Alzheimer-related dementia (3 patients), chronic schizophrenia (3 patients), severe anxiety disorder (1 patient), and severe developmental disability (1 patient). The median tumor size was 3.4 cm (range, 1.1-10.5), and 7 patients (87.5 %) had central lesions. The median follow-up time was 22.5 months. The most common (50%) SBRT schedule used was 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Intravenous propofol (10 mg/mL) was used for OPA in all cases at the time of simulation and with daily treatments. OPA was well tolerated and all patients completed SBRT as prescribed. There was one grade 5 but no other grade 3 or higher SBRT-related toxicities. One patient died with local failure and one of distant failure.

Conclusions

OPA made lung SBRT feasible for patients with CIs. SBRT outcomes were in keeping with those reported in the literature. CI should not be considered a contraindication per se to SBRT delivery in patients otherwise appropriate for this modality.

Current radiotherapy techniques in NSCLC: challenges and potential solutions

Introduction: Radiotherapy is an important therapeutic strategy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent decades, technological implementations and the introduction of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have significantly increased the accuracy and tolerability of radiation therapy.Area covered: In this review, we provide an overview of technological opportunities and future prospects in NSCLC management.Expert opinion: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is now considered the standard approach in patients ineligible for surgery, while in operable cases, it is still under debate. Additionally, in combination with systemic treatment, SBRT is an innovative option for managing oligometastatic patients and features encouraging initial results in clinical outcomes. To date, in inoperable locally advanced NSCLC, the radical dose prescription has not changed (60 Gy in 30 fractions), despite the median overall survival progressively increasing. These results arise from technological improvements in precisely hitting target treatment volumes and organ at risk sparing, which are associated with better treatment qualities. Finally, for the management of NSCLC, proton and carbon ion therapies and the recent development of MR-Linac are new, intriguing technological approaches under investigation.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of 60 Gy in eight fractions is safe for ultracentral non-small cell lung cancer

Background

There is no consensus on the definition or recommended radiotherapy treatment of ultracentral non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report our institution's experience in treating ultracentral lung cancer patients with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of 60 Gy in eight fractions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 21 ultracentral NSCLC patients treated with 60 Gy SABR in eight fractions. We defined ultracentral lung cancer as the planning target volume (PTV) directly abutting or overlapping central structures, including the proximal bronchial tree, heart, and great vessels but not the esophagus. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and local control (LC). Toxicity was scored per the CTCAE v4.03.

Results

The median follow‐up time was 15 months, and the median OS was 15 months. The one‐ and two‐year OS rates were 87.5% and 76.6%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year PFS rates were 71.1% and 64.0%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year LC rates were 92.9% and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 treatment‐related toxicities was 19.1%. There was no grade ≥ 3 treatment‐related toxicity.

Conclusion

SABR of 60 Gy in eight fractions is feasible for ultracentral NSCLC.

To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy?: A Matched Cohort Analysis of Early-Stage Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Radiation with or Without Histologic Confirmation

PURPOSE

For nonoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment option. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of lung SBRT between patients with versus without pathologic cancer diagnosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We included patients treated by SBRT for a single pulmonary lesion between July 2009 and July 2017. Patients in the clinical diagnosis group had a positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan showing hypermetabolism, growth of the mass on sequential computed tomography, and were not eligible for biopsy, refused biopsy, or had an inconclusive biopsy. For each of those patients, a matched pair in the pathologic diagnosis group was identified by matching for patient, treatment, and tumoral characteristics. We performed a power calculation to estimate the sample size required to detect a difference arising from a 5% or 15% rate of benign processes in the group without pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 924 lung SBRT treatments were performed among 878 patients from 2009 to 2017. Within this population, 131 patients were treated based on clinical findings. They were matched with 131 patients with a pathologic diagnosis who received treatment. At 3 years, no significant differences were observed in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.1), local control (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-2), or regional (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-1.4) or distant recurrence (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, we found no clinically significant difference in patterns of recurrence or survival after lung SBRT for patients who had received clinical versus pathological diagnoses. There was, however, a trend toward more distant recurrences in the pathologic diagnosis group. Our power calculation suggests that data from multiple institutions would be required to rule out a difference in outcomes due to 5% to 15% of clinically diagnosed cases being treated for benign processes.

Biologically Effective Dose in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Survival for Patients With Early-Stage NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) results in excellent local control of stage I NSCLC. Radiobiology models predict greater tumor response when higher biologically effective doses (BED₁₀) are given. Prior studies support a BED₁₀ greater than or equal to 100 Gy with SBRT; however, data are limited comparing outcomes after various SBRT regimens. We therefore sought to evaluate national trends and the effect of using "low" versus "high" BED₁₀ SBRT courses on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This retrospective study used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage I (cT1-2aN0M0) NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 treated with SBRT. Patients were categorized into LowBED (100-129 Gy) or HighBED (≥130 Gy) groups. A 1:1 matched analysis based on patient and tumor characteristics was used to compare OS by BED₁₀ group. Tumor centrality was not assessed.

RESULTS

O 25,039 patients treated with LowBED (n = 14,756; 59%) or HighBED (n = 10,283; 41%) SBRT, 20,542 were matched. Shifts in HighBED to LowBED SBRT regimen use correlated with key publications in the literature. In the matched cohort, 5-year OS rates were 26% for LowBED and 34% for HighBED groups (p = 0.039). On multivariate analysis, receipt of LowBED was associated with significantly worse survival (hazard ratio = 1.046, 95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.090, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

LowBED SBRT for treating stage I NSCLC is becoming more common. However, our findings suggest SBRT regimens with BED₁₀ greater than or equal to 130 Gy may confer an additional survival benefit. Additional studies are required to evaluate the dose-response relationship and toxicities associated with modern HighBED SBRT.

Treatment of oligometastatic lung cancer with brain metastases using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Background

There is increasing interest in treating oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with stereotactic radiation. We aimed to address whether patients definitively treated with synchronous thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) had favorable outcomes with local therapy.

Materials and methods

We reviewed a database of patients receiving lung SBRT as well as a database for brain metastasis patients treated with SRS between June 2004 and January 2016. We selected for cT1-2aN0M1 NSCLC patients with brain metastases and calculated their overall survival (OS), freedom from progression (FFP), and local control (LC) rates.

Results

Six patients had oligometastatic NSCLC with 1-3 synchronous brain metastases treated with lung SBRT and brain SRS. No patients received immunotherapy and two-thirds did not receive systemic therapy. Median follow-up was 9 months for the entire cohort (range, 2-95 months) and 95 months for the surviving patient. Median OS was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-18 months). At 1 year, patients had 67% OS (95% CI, 29-100%), 17% FFP (95% CI, 0-46%), and 100% LC. Their brain disease had 80% 1-year LC (95% CI, 45-100%) and 53% 1-year FFP (95% CI, 5-100%). Two patients had no distant progression, two had brain progression, one had adrenal gland progression, and one had bone and liver progression.

Conclusion

In patients presenting with oligometastatic lung cancer limited to the brain, treatment with both lung SBRT and brain SRS achieves good LC of all sites with encouraging OS.

Contrast enhanced oesophageal avoidance for stereotactic body radiotherapy: Barium vs. Gastrografin

INTRODUCTION

SABR may facilitate treatment in a greater proportion of locally-advanced NSCLC patients, just as it has for early-stage disease. The oesophagus is one of the key dose-limiting organs and visualization during IGRT would better ensure toxicity is avoided. As the oesophagus is poorly seen on CBCT, we assessed the extent to which this is improved using two oral contrast agents.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Six patients receiving radiotherapy for Stage I-III NSCLC were assigned to receive 50 mL Gastrografin or 50 mL barium sulphate prior to simulation and pre-treatment CBCTs. Three additional patients who did not receive contrast were included as a control group. Oesophageal visibility was determined by assessing concordance between six experienced observers in contouring the organ. 36 datasets and 216 contours were analysed. A STAPLE contour was created and compared to each individual contour. Descriptive statistics were used and a Kappa statistic, Dice Coefficient and Hausdorff distance were calculated and compared using a t-test. Contrast-induced artefact was assessed by observer scoring.

RESULTS

Both contrast agents significantly improved the consistency of oesophagus localisation on CBCT across all comparison metrics compared to CBCTs without contrast. Barium performed significantly better than Gastrografin with improved kappa statistics (p = 0.007), dice coefficients (p < 0.001) and Hausdorff distances (p = 0.002), although at a cost of increased image artefact.

DISCUSSION

Barium produced lower delineation uncertainties but more image artefact, compared to Gastrografin and no contrast. It is feasible to use oral contrast as a tool in IGRT to help guide clinicians and therapists with online matching and monitoring of the oesophageal position.

Definitive Radiotherapy for Inoperable Stage IIB Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Patterns of Care and Comparative Effectiveness

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze practice patterns and perform comparative effectiveness of definitive radiotherapy techniques for inoperable stage IIB (American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with T3N0M0 or T1-2N1M0 NCSLC between 2004 and 2015 who received definitive radiotherapy were identified. Cases were divided as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and stratified by systemic therapy (ST). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the effect of covariates on overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis by tumor size, chest wall invasion, multifocality, and ST use was performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS.

RESULTS

A total of 10,081 subjects met inclusion criteria: 4401 T3N0M0 (66.5% CFRT, 11.0% HFRT, and 22.5% SBRT) and 5680 T1-2N1M0 (92.5% CFRT and 7.5% HFRT). For T3N0M0 NSCLC, SBRT utilization increased from 3.7% in 2006% to 35.4% in 2015. Subjects treated with SBRT were more likely to have smaller tumors, multifocal tumors, or adenocarcinoma histology. SBRT resulted in similar or superior OS compared with CFRT for tumors > 5 cm, tumors invading the chest wall, or multifocal tumors. SBRT was significantly associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.715; P < .001). For T1-2N1M0 NSCLC, patients treated with HFRT were significantly older and less likely to receive ST; nevertheless, there was no difference in OS between HFRT and CFRT on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

CFRT + ST is utilized most frequently to treat stage IIB NSCLC in the United States when surgery is not performed, though it is decreasing. SBRT utilization for T3N0M0 NSCLC is increasing and was associated with improved OS.

A preliminary experience of moderate-intensity stereotactic body radiation therapy for ultra-central lung tumor

Purpose: Administration of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to ultra-central (UC) lung tumors, generally defined as those abutting the proximal bronchial trees, is difficult due to concerns about serious toxicities. Therefore, our institution has performed moderate-intensity SBRT. Patients and methods: Patients with UC tumors underwent SBRT at a dose of 50-60 Gy in 10 fractions, with D_max in the target volume not exceeding 110% of the prescribed dose. The primary outcomes were tumor response and overall survival (OS). Results: From January 2017 to September 2018, we treated eight patients who had been diagnosed with UC tumors. The median follow-up time was 8.6 months (range: 2.7-14.9). Five of the eight patients (62.5%) showed a complete response (CR), two (25%) had a partial response (PR), and one (12.5%) had stable disease (SD); the response and disease control rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Seven patients were alive with no evidence of disease or with controlled disease until the last follow-ups, except for one patient who died due to a non-RT cause at 3 months after SBRT. One patient experienced grade 2 esophageal pain and another had grade 1 cough. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported. Conclusion: Moderate-intensity SBRT might aid in achieving good control of UC tumors without excessive toxicities. Future studies involving larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up times are warranted to confirm the efficacy and feasibility.

Safety and Effectiveness of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumors is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review to summarize existing data and identify trends in treatment-related toxicity and local control following SABR in patients with ultra-central lung lesions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases. The databases were queried from dates of inception until September 27, 2018. Studies in the English language that reported treatment-related toxicity and local control outcomes post-SABR for patients with ultra-central lung lesions were included. Guidelines, reviews, non-peer reviewed correspondences, studies focused on re-irradiation, and studies with fewer than five patients were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 446 studies were identified, with 10 meeting all criteria for inclusion. The total sample size from the identified studies was 250 ultra-central lung patients and all studies were retrospective in design. Radiotherapy dose and fractionation ranged from 30 to 60 Gy in 3 to 12 fractions, with biologically effective doses (BED₁₀) ranging from 48 to 138 Gy₁₀ (median, 78-103 Gy₁₀). Median treatment-related grade 3 or greater toxicity was 10% (range, 0-50%). Median treatment-related mortality was 5% (range, 0-22%), most commonly from pulmonary hemorrhage (55%). High-risk indicators for SABR-related mortality included gross endobronchial disease, maximum dose to the proximal bronchial tree greater than or equal to 180 Gy₃ (BED₃, corresponding to 45 Gy in 5 fractions or 55 Gy in 8 fractions), peri-SABR bevacizumab use, and antiplatelet/anticoagulant use. Median 1-year local control rate was 96% (range, 63%-100%) and 2-year local control rate was 92% (range, 57%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

SABR for ultra-central lung lesions appears feasible but there is a potential for severe toxicity in patients receiving high doses to the proximal bronchial tree, those with endobronchial disease, and those receiving bevacizumab or anticoagulants around the time of SABR. Prospective studies are required to establish the optimal doses, volumes, and normal tissue tolerances for SABR in this patient population.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy with higher biologically effective dose is associated with improved survival in stage II non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study evaluates SBRT dose prescription patterns and survival outcomes in Stage II NSCLC using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with Stage II NSCLC and treated with SBRT between 2004-2013 were identified in NCDB. The biologically effective dose with α/β = 10 Gy (BED₁₀) was calculated. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 56,543 patients with Stage II NSCLC, 451 (0.8%) received SBRT. There were 360 patients (79.8%) with node-negative and 91 patients (20.2%) with node-positive disease. The most common prescriptions were 10 Gy x 5 (35.9%) and 12 Gy x 4 (19.3%). The mean and median BED₁₀ were 114.9 Gy and 105.6 Gy, respectively. With median follow-up of 19.3 months, overall median survival was 23.7 months. Median survival was 22.4 months for those treated with BED₁₀ < 114.9 Gy versus 31.5 months for BED₁₀ ≥ 114.9 Gy (p = 0.036). On multivariate analysis, BED₁₀ as a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR] 0.991, p = 0.009) and ≥ 114.9 Gy (HR 0.63, p = 0.015) were associated with improved survival in node-negative patients. BED₁₀ as a continuous variable (HR 0.997, p = 0.465) and ≥ 114.9 Gy (HR 0.81, p = 0.546) were not significant factors for predicting survival in node-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is infrequently utilized to treat Stage II NSCLC in the United States. Treatment with higher BED₁₀ was associated with improved survival, and the benefit was limited to patients with node-negative disease.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Primary Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for centrally located, primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic search of 4 databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) was performed for literature published until May 9, 2018. Primary (overall survival [OS] and local control [LC] rates) and secondary (Grade ≥3 toxicity) endpoints were reported.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies encompassing 599 patients with central NSCLCs were included. Median values of T1 tumor proportion, tumor size, and median survival were 55.3% (range, 0%-75%), 3.3 (range, 2.1-4.1) cm, and 26 (range, 14-68.9) months, respectively. Pooled rates of 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 84.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.7-90.3), 64.0% (95% CI, 52.9-72.2), and 50.5% (95% CI, 39.4-61.5), respectively. Pooled rates of 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates were 89.4% (95% CI, 80.8-94.4), 82.2% (95% CI, 71.7-89.4), and 72.2% (95% CI, 55.0-84.7), respectively. Pooled rate of Grade ≥3 complication was 12.0% (95% CI, 7.3-19.0). Meta-regression analyses showed significant positive relationships between biologically equivalent dose using an α/β of 10 Gy in the linear quadratic model (BED_10Gy) and 1- and 2-year LC rates (P < .001 and P < .001), and 1- and 2-year OS rates (P = .0178 and P = .032), and Grade ≥3 complication rate (P = .0029). In subgroup comparisons between BED_10Gy <100 Gy versus ≥100 Gy, 1- and 2-year LC rates were significantly different but not for OS and Grade ≥3 complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggests that SBRT is potent for tumor control in central NSCLC, although complications should be further minimized through optimization of dose-fractionation scheme and accurate planning. Using BED_10Gy ≥100 Gy yielded higher LC rates, and dose escalation was related to OS, LC, and complications.

Adjuvant chemotherapy following stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer is associated with lower overall: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant chemotherapy is routinely offered post-surgical resection for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≥4 cm; however, its role following definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has not been well defined. We investigated the association between receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy post-SBRT and overall survival (OS) for patients with T1-T3N0M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The NCDB was queried for patients with T1-T3N0M0 NSCLC treated with definitive SBRT from 2004 to 2014. The association between non-randomized receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and OS was analyzed for all patients (n = 24,011) and a propensity-matched cohort (n = 608) using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. A subset analysis was performed for patients with tumors ≥4 cm (n = 2,323).

RESULTS

There were 24,011 patients in the cohort with a median follow-up of 32.5 months. Of these, 322 (1.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Three-year OS was 41.3% with adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 50.6% without adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with higher overall mortality (hazard ratio:1.22, 95% confidence interval:1.06-1.40, p = 0.005). For tumors ≥4 cm, 3-year OS was 38.2% with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 80) compared to 33.0% without adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.81). After propensity-score matching, there was a persistent association between lower OS and adjuvant chemotherapy with those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 322) having 3-year OS of 41.3% compared to 60.9% without adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy following definitive SBRT for T1-3N0M0 NSCLC is associated with lower OS and is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with tumors ≥4 cm.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile of SBRT for Centrally Located NSCLC

Purpose

Previous studies suggest that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with higher toxicity rates for central lung tumors relative to peripheral tumors when using 3 fraction SBRT. The initial results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 0813 suggest a safe toxicity profile of SBRT administered in 5 fractions for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed our institutional data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT for central NSCLC.

Methods and materials

We reviewed our prospectively collected SBRT database for patients with central NSCLC who received SBRT between 2008 and 2014. The most frequent dose and fractionations were 50 Gy in 5 fractions (59%) and 48 Gy in 4 fraction (30%). Local control (LC), regional control, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminal Criteria for Adverse Events were used for toxicity grading.

Results

A total of 110 central lung tumors in 103 patients were included. The median age was 74 years (range, 40-95 years), and the median follow-up time of living patients was 50 months. The mean tumor size was 20 mm (range, 5-70 mm). The 5 year rate of LC, regional control, and distant control was 89%, 77%, and 82%, respectively. The median and 5-year overall survival were 3.5 years and 35%, respectively. No treatment variables were associated with tumor control or other clinical outcomes. A single patient experienced grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (0.97%). The rate of late toxicity grade ≥3 was 9.7% (grade 3, 7.7%; grade 4, 0.97%; grade 5, 0.97%) and included pneumonitis (3.9%), bronchial necrosis (2.9%), myocardial dysfunction (1.9%), and worsening heart failure (0.97%).

Conclusions

SBRT for central NSCLC provides high rates of LC. Despite excellent LC, patients remain at risk for regional and distant failure. The rate of grade 3 pneumonitis was consistent with that of prior reports. We observed low rates of grade 4-5 toxicity potentially attributable to SBRT. Our results contribute to the growing body of data in support of the safety of SBRT for central NSCLC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the treatment of choice for medically inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A literature search primarily based on PubMed electronic databases was completed in July 2018. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined prior to the search, and only prospective clinical trials were included. Nineteen trials from 2005 to 2018 met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 1434 patients with central and peripheral early stage NSCLC. Patient eligibility, prescription dose and delivery, and follow up duration varied widely. Three-years overall survival ranged from 43% to 95% with loco-regional control of up to 98% at 3 years. Up to 33% of patients failed distantly after SBRT at 3 years. SBRT was generally well tolerated with 10%-30% grade 3-4 toxicities and a few treatment-related deaths. No differences in outcomes were observed between conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and SBRT, central and peripheral lung tumors, or inoperable and operable patients. SBRT remains a reasonable treatment option for medically inoperable and select operable patients with early stage NSCLC. SBRT has shown excellent local and regional control with toxicity rates equivalent to surgery. Decreasing fractionation schedules have been consistently shown to be both safe and effective. Distant failure is common, and chemotherapy may be considered for select patients. However, the survival benefit of additional interventions, such as chemotherapy, for early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT remains unclear.

A pilot study of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after surgery for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Standard therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer with chemotherapy and conventional radiation has suboptimal outcomes. We hypothesized that a combination of surgery followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) would be a safe alternative.

Methods

Patients with stage IIIA (multistation N2) or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled from March 2013 to December 2015. The protocol included transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) followed by surgical resection, 10 Gy SBRT directed to the involved mediastinum/hilar stations and/or positive surgical margins, and adjuvant systemic therapy. Patients not suitable for anatomic lung resection were treated with 30 Gy to the primary tumor. The primary efficacy end-point was the proportion of patients with grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) or toxicities.

Results

Of 10 patients, 7 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients had TEMLA. Nine of 10 patients underwent surgical resection. The remaining patient had an unresectable tumor and received 30 Gy SBRT to the primary lesion. All patients had post-operative SBRT. Median follow-up was 18 months. There were no perioperative mortalities. Six patients had any grade 3 AEs with no grade 4–5 AEs. Of these, 4 were not attributable to radiation. Pulmonary-related grade 3 AEs were experienced by 2 patients. There were no failures within the 10 Gy volume. Overall survival and progression-free survival rates at 2 years were 68% (90% CI 36–86) and 40% (90% CI 16–63), respectively.

Conclusions

In carefully selected patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, combining surgery with SBRT was well tolerated with no local failure.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifying number NCT01781741. Registered February 1, 2013.

Tumor Control and Toxicity after SBRT for Ultracentral, Central, and Paramediastinal Lung Tumors

PURPOSE

Increased rates of toxicity have been described after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for central lung tumors within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). Recent studies have defined a new class of ultracentral tumors. We report our experience treating ultracentral, central, and paramediastinal tumors with SBRT and compare toxicity, disease control, and survival rates.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the records of patients with central lung tumors treated with SBRT between September 2009 and July 2017. Tumors were classified as central if within 2 cm of the PBT, ultracentral if the planning target volume touched the PBT or esophagus, and paramediastinal if touching mediastinal pleura. Actuarial rates of grades 2+ and 3+ toxicity, local control (LC), and overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. Toxicity was scored with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03.

RESULTS

We identified 68 patients with 69 central lung tumors, including 14 ultracentral, 15 paramediastinal, and 39 central tumors. Fifty-three patients were treated for early stage lung cancer and 15 for lung metastases. The prescribed dose ranged from 40 Gy to 60 Gy over 3 to 8 fractions. Most patients were treated using 5 fractions (83%), followed by 8 fractions (10%). Median follow-up was 19.7 months (range, 3.3-78.3 months). The 2-year estimates of LC (89%, 85%, and 93%, respectively; P = .72) and overall survival (76%, 73%, and 72%, respectively; P = .75) for ultracentral, central, and paramediastinal tumors were similar. Ultracentral tumors had an increased risk of grade 2+ toxicity (57.6% vs 14.2% vs 7.1%; P = .007) at 2 years. One patient with an ultracentral tumor developed grade 5 respiratory failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The oncologic outcomes after SBRT for ultracentral, central, and paramediastinal lung tumors were similar, with LC exceeding 85% at 2 years using predominantly 5-fraction schedules. Ultracentral lung tumors were associated with an increased risk of toxicity in our patient cohort. Additional studies are needed to minimize toxicity for ultracentral tumors.

Organs at Risk Considerations for Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: What Is Safe for Lung Parenchyma?

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and is often used for recurrent lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT), including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, is a major concern for which it is important to understand dosimetric and clinical predictors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was undertaken through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Working Group on Biological Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Data from studies of lung SBRT published through the summer of 2016 that provided detailed information about RILT were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies were ultimately considered. Definitions of the risk organ and complication endpoints as well as dose-volume information presented varied among studies. The risk of RILT, including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, was reported to be associated with the size and location of the tumor. Patients with interstitial lung disease appear to be especially susceptible to severe RILT. A variety of dosimetric parameters were reported to be associated with RILT. There was no apparent threshold "tolerance dose-volume" level. However, most studies noted safe treatment with a rate of symptomatic RILT of <10% to 15% after lung SBRT with a mean lung dose (MLD) of the combined lungs ≤8 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions and the percent of total lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V₂₀) <10% to 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

To allow more rigorous analysis of this complication, future studies should standardize reporting by including standardized endpoint and volume definitions and providing dose-volume information for all patients, with and without RILT.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Multiple Primary Lung Cancers

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple primary lung cancers increasingly receive multiple courses of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of such treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed a prospective lung SBRT database of patients treated for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer between June 2004 and December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 374 patients received a single course of SBRT, 14 received synchronous SBRT, 48 received metachronous SBRT alone, and 108 received surgery and metachronous SBRT. Median follow-up was 37.0 months for survivors. Patients who received a single course had a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 54.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8-59.3), 3-year freedom from progression (FFP) of 67.3% (95% CI, 60.9-72.9), and grade 3 or higher toxicity of 3.5%. Compared to single-course patients, patients receiving metachronous SBRT alone and patients receiving surgery and metachronous SBRT had improved OS (79.7% [95% CI, 64.4-88.9%], P < .0001 and 95.4% [95% CI, 89.2-98.0%], P < .0001, respectively) and FFP (85.8% [95% CI, 70.7-93.5], P = .03 and 95.4% [95% CI, 89.2-98.0%], P < .0001, respectively). Patients receiving synchronous SBRT had similar OS (46.4% [95% CI, 19.3-69.9%], P = .75) and similar FFP (57.5% [95% CI, 25.3-80.0%], P = .17) as single-course patients. There were no significant differences in rates of grade 3 or higher toxicity or of grade 1 or higher toxicity between single-course patients and the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received either synchronous or metachronous SBRT had no significant detriment in OS or toxicity compared to single-course patients. This supports the use of SBRT in patients with multiple primary lung cancers.

Survival Rates after Thermal Ablation versus Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study

Purpose To compare survival rates of thermal ablation and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with stage 1 NSCLC treated by thermal ablation (TA) or SRT were identified in the 2004-2013 National Cancer Database. Patients who underwent TA and SRT were one-to-one propensity matched to undergo thermal ablation. Outcomes were overall survival and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after treatment. Results This study included 28 834 patients (TA, 1102 patients; SRT, 27 732 patients). Patients treated with TA had more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index of 1 vs ≥2, 32.8% [362 of 1102] vs 19.7% [217 of 1102], respectively) compared with SRT (Charlson comorbidity index of 1 vs ≥2, 26.9% [7448 of 27 732] vs 15.3% [4251 of 27 732], respectively; P , .001) and smaller tumor size (mean tumor size, TA vs SRT: 19 mm vs 22 mm, respectively; P , .001). In the propensity score-matched cohort with balanced distribution of potential confounders, there was no significant difference in overall survival between TA and SRT at a mean follow-up of 52.4 months (survival difference, P = .69). Overall survival rates were comparable between TA and SRT (1 year, 85.4% vs 86.3%, respectively, P = .76; 2 years, 65.2% vs 64.5%, respectively, P = .43; 3 years, 47.8% vs 45.9%, respectively, P = .32; 5 years, 24.6% vs 26.1%, respectively, P = .81). Unplanned hospital readmission rates were higher for patients who underwent TA versus those who underwent SRT (3.7% [40 of 1070] vs 0.2% [two of 1070], respectively; P , .001). Conclusion Regarding overall survival, thermal ablation was noninferior to stereotactic radiation therapy for primary treatment of stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Shyn in this issue.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for central lung tumors: Finding the balance between safety and efficacy in the "no fly" zone

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly effective technique to treat medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Doses must be chosen carefully when treating central lesions because of the potential for significant toxicity. This study reviews the outcomes of a cohort of patients with central lung tumors treated with SBRT.

METHODS

We identified 18 patients (12 women, 6 men) with central lesions that were treated with SBRT at our institution. Overall survival and local, regional, and distant control rates were assessed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Correlations with outcomes were determined by multivariate analysis via Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine percent of patients had a pathological diagnosis of NSCLC. The median dose to the planning target volume was 40 Gy (range: 30-50) in five fractions, yielding a median biologic equivalent dose (BED₁₀ ) of 72 (range: 48-100). The median planning target volume was 34 cc (range: 13.3-89). Local control was 87% at one year. Median overall survival was 45 months, with a two-year rate of 61%. The two-year regional control rate was 87%. BED₁₀ > 72 predicted improved progression-free survival, with one-year rates of 100% versus 40% with increased BED (P = 0.012). No grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung SBRT to central lesions is safe and effective when using five fraction regimens. BED₁₀ < 72 predicted disease progression, highlighting the importance of choosing an effective dose fractionation scheme, which must in turn be balanced with potential toxicity.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Biopsy-Proven Primary Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Experience of Patients With Inoperable Cancer at a Single Brazilian Institution

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the clinical outcomes and toxicity for patients with inoperable primary NSCLC treated with SBRT.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2015, 102 consecutive lung lesions were treated with SBRT at our center, of which 59 primary NSCLC lesions (from 54 patients with inoperable disease) were retrospectively reviewed (43 lesions were excluded because of metastases or because there was no biopsy specimen). We report infield local control (LC) per SBRT target, regional or distant failure-free survival, and overall survival (OS) per patient, using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Serious toxicity was retrospectively scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.

Results

Most of the 54 patients were men (n = 41; 76%), median age was 75 years; stage IA (n = 36; 66%) and adenocarcinoma (n = 43; 80%) were the most common stage and histologic diagnosis, respectively. Five patients had two lung lesions. A median of three fractions (range, 3 to 5 fractions) and a total median dose of 54 Gy (range, 45 to 60 Gy) per lesion were prescribed. The median follow-up was 17.8 months (range, 4 to 56.4 months). The 2-year rates of LC, regional or distant failure-free survival, and OS were 89.1% (95% CI, 72.2% to 96%), 79% (95% CI, 59.8% to 89.8%), and 80% (95% CI, 64% to 89.8%), respectively. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were observed in two patients (3%): grade 3 pneumonitis (n = 1) and grade 4 skin toxicity (n = 1).

Conclusion

SBRT results in high rates of 2-year LC, regional or distant failure-free survival, and OS with low rates of severe toxicity in patients with inoperable primary NSCLC disease.

Comparison of Single- and Five-fraction Regimens of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Peripheral Early-stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Two-institution Propensity-matched Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences in local control (LC), disease-specific (DC), and overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with single- (SF) versus 5-fraction (FF) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at 2 institutions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Peripheral early-stage NSCLC cases treated with a median dose of 30 Gy in SF or a median dose of 50 Gy in FF were included per institutional practice. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to assess survival. A matched-pair analysis was performed to account for imbalances. Toxicities including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 pneumonitis, chest wall pain requiring long-acting narcotics, and hospitalization for respiratory events 6 months posttreatment were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 163 lesions were treated between 2007 and 2015; 65 received SF SBRT and 98 received FF SBRT. Most tumors were T1 (n = 92) and T2 (n = 34) lesions and had adenocarcinoma (n = 77) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 46) histologies, respectively. In the matched cohort, there were no differences in OS, LC, DC, or progression-free survival between the groups. LC and OS at 1 year in the matched cohort was 95% and 88%, and 87% and 84% in the SF and FF cohorts, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 pneumonitis in the FF group, and 9 total hospitalizations post-SBRT, 3 (5%) in the SF group and 6 (6%) in the FF group.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were seen in LC or DC following SF or FF SBRT in this matched cohort of peripheral lesions. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were reported.

Virtual Bronchoscopy-Guided Treatment Planning to Map and Mitigate Radiation-Induced Airway Injury in Lung SAbR

PURPOSE

Radiation injury to the bronchial tree is an important yet poorly understood potential side effect in lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SAbR). We investigate the integration of virtual bronchoscopy in radiation therapy planning to quantify dosage to individual airways. We develop a risk model of airway collapse and develop treatment plans that reduce the risk of radiation-induced airway injury.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pre- and post-SAbR diagnostic-quality computerized tomography (CT) scans were retrospectively collected from 26 lung cancer patients. From each scan, the bronchial tree was segmented using a virtual bronchoscopy system and registered deformably to the planning CT. Univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regressions were performed, examining factors such as age, comorbidities, smoking pack years, airway diameter, and maximum point dosage (D_max). Logistic regression was utilized to formulate a risk function of segmental collapse based on D_max and diameter. The risk function was incorporated into the objective function along with clinical dosage volume constraints for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that segmental diameter (P = .014) and D_max (P = .007) were significantly correlated with airway segment collapse. Multivariate stepwise Cox regression showed that diameter (P = .015), D_max (P < .0001), and pack/years of smoking (P = .02) were significant independent factors associated with collapse. Risk management-based plans enabled significant dosage reduction to individual airway segments while fulfilling clinical dosimetric objectives.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic investigation of functional avoidance in lung SAbR based on mapping and minimizing doses to individual bronchial segments. Our early results show that it is possible to substantially lower airway dosage. Such dosage reduction may potentially reduce the risk of radiation-induced airway injury, while satisfying clinically prescribed dosimetric objectives.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for central lung tumors, yes we can!

BACKGROUND

SBRT is standard therapy for early stage lung cancer. Toxicity in central tumors has been a concern. RTOG 0813 showed that central SBRT is safe and effective. We report our experience with central SBRT.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients treated with SBRT for central lung tumors (< 2 cm of the carina). Patients included primary lung cancer and recurrence following surgery and\ or conventional radiotherapy. All patients underwent 4DCT simulation and treatment planning was done with IMRT or VMAT techniques. Dose to the PTV was prescribed to the 95% isodose line.

RESULTS

Seventy patients, between 5/09 and 4/13, were treated. Patients had early non-small cell lung cancer (n = 13) or locally recurrent lung cancer (n = 29) and pulmonary oligometastases (n = 28). Fifty-seven percent of the patients received BED of 132 with a schedule of 60Gy in 12 Gy fractions. Median follow up time was 18.3 months, 4/70 patients experienced local failure (6%). Median OS for the whole cohort was 4.6 years (CI 3-7 years). Ten patients had grade 1-2 radiation pneumonitis. One patient developed fatal bronchial bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for central tumors is safe and effective in patients with central disease, reiradiation, recurrence following surgery and in oligometastes.

Phase 2 Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy for High-Risk, Medically Inoperable, Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To report the feasibility of conducting a randomized study to compare the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) for high-risk, medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with medically inoperable NSCLC with high-risk features (centrally located or <5 cm T3 tumor or isolated lung parenchymal recurrences) were randomly assigned to SBRT or SBPT. Radiation dose was 50 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 4 12.5-Gy(RBE) fractions prescribed to the planning target volume. Stereotactic body radiation therapy was given using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy, and SBPT was given using passive scattering. Consistency in patient setup was ensured with on-board cone beam computed tomography for the SBRT group and with orthogonal X rays for the SBPT group.

RESULTS

The study closed early owing to poor accrual, largely because of insurance coverage and lack of volumetric imaging in the SBPT group. Ultimately, 21 patients were enrolled, and 19 patients who received 50 Gy in 4 fractions were included for analysis (9 SBRT, 10 SBPT). At a median follow-up time of 32 months, median overall survival time was 28 months in the SBRT group and not reached in the SBPT group. Three-year overall survival was 27.8% and 90%, 3-year local control was 87.5% (8 of 9) and 90.0% (9 of 10), and 3-year regional control was 47.6% (5 of 9) and 90% (9 of 10) in the SBRT and SBPT groups, respectively. One patient in the SBPT group developed grade 3 skin fibrosis. No patients experienced grade 4/5 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Poor accrual, due to lack of volumetric imaging and insurance coverage for proton therapy, led to early closure of the trial and precluded accurate assessment of efficacy and toxicity. Comparable maturity of 2 radiation therapy modalities, particularly on-board imaging, and better insurance coverage for SBPT should be considered for future studies.

Esophagus toxicity after stereotactic and hypofractionated radiotherapy for central lung tumors: Normal tissue complication probability modeling

PURPOSE

To correlate esophagus toxicity and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters in order to assess risks, and derive a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with a central lung tumor from 2 centers, who underwent stereotactic or hypofractionated radiotherapy (≤12 fractions), were analyzed. Doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy with an α/β ratio of 10 (EQD₂¹⁰). The esophagus was manually delineated and DVH-parameters (D_max,EQD2, D_1cc,EQD2, D_2cc,EQD2, D_5cc,EQD2) were analyzed and used for NTCP modeling based on logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-and-thirty-one patients with 252 tumors were eligible. No acute or late grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity was reported. Acute grade 1-2 esophagus toxicity was recorded in 38 patients (17%). All DVH-parameters were significantly higher in patients with toxicity. NTCP models showed a 50% probability of acute grade 1-2 toxicity at a D_max of 67 Gy EQD₂¹⁰ and D_1cc of 42 Gy EQD₂¹⁰. No difference in overall survival was observed between patients with and without toxicity (p = 0.428).

CONCLUSION

As no grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity was observed in our cohort, a D_max of 56 Gy EQD₂¹⁰ and a D_5cc of 35.5 Gy EQD₂¹⁰ could be delivered without high risks of severe toxicity. The NTCP models of this study might be used as practical guidelines for the treatment of central lung tumors with stereotactic radiotherapy.

Ablative Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Enhances Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Killing via Preferential Stimulation of Necroptosis In Vitro and In Vivo

PURPOSE

To investigate how necroptosis (ie, programmed necrosis) is involved in killing of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after ablative hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Deoxyribonucleic acid damage, DNA repair, and the death form of NSCLC cells were assessed after radiation therapy. The overexpression and silencing of receptor-interacting protein kinases 3 (RIP3, a key protein involved activation of necroptosis)-stable NSCLC cell lines were successfully constructed. The form of cell death, the number and area of colonies, and the regulatory proteins of necroptosis were characterized after radiation therapy in vitro. Finally, NSCLC xenografts and patient specimens were used to examine involvement of necroptosis after ablative HFRT in vivo.

RESULTS

Radiation therapy induced expected DNA damage and repair of NSCLC cell lines, but ablative HFRT at ≥10 Gy per fraction preferentially stimulated necroptosis in NSCLC cells and xenografts with high RIP3 expression, as characterized by induction and activation of RIP3 and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein and release of immune-activating chemokine high-mobility group box 1. In contrast, RNA interference of RIP3 attenuated ablative HFRT-induced necroptosis and activation of its regulatory proteins. Among central early-stage NSCLC patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy, high expression of RIP3 was associated with improved local control and progression-free survival (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ablative HFRT at ≥10 Gy per fraction enhances killing of NSCLC with high RIP3 expression via preferential stimulation of necroptosis. RIP3 may serve as a useful biomarker to predict favorable response to stereotactic body radiation therapy.