1
|
Credidio L, Martinez CAR, Magro DO, Carvalho RBD, Ayrizono MDLS, Coy CSR. INFLUENCE OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY ON THE RATIO OF LYMPH NODES. Arq Gastroenterol 2024; 61:e23131. [PMID: 38451667 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the relationship between the ratio of affected lymph nodes (LNR) and clinical and anatomopathological variables in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma submitted or not to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS The LNR was determined by dividing the number of compromised LNR by the total number of LNR dissected in the surgical specimen. Patients were divided into two groups: with QRT and without QRT. In each group, the relationship between LNR and the following variables was evaluated: degree of cell differentiation, depth of invasion in the rectal wall, angiolymphatic /perineural invasion, degree of tumor regression and occurrence of metastases. The LNR was evaluated in patients with more than 1, LNR (LNR >12) or less (LNR<12) in the surgical specimen with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The results were expressed as the mean with the respective standard deviation. Qualitative variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, while quantitative variables were analyzed using the Kruskal -Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. The significance level was 5%. RESULTS We evaluated 282 patients with QRT and 114 without QRT, between 1995-2011. In the QRT Group, LNR showed a significant association with mucinous tumors (P=0.007) and degree of tumor regression (P=0.003). In both groups, LNR was associated with poorly differentiated tumors (P=0.001, P=0.02), presence of angiolymphatic invasion (P<0.0001 and P=0.01), perineural (P=0.0007, P=0.02), degree of rectal wall invasion (T3>T2; P<0.0001, P=0.02); Compromised LNR (P<0.0001, P<0.01), metastases (P<0.0001, P<0.01). In patients with QRT, LNR<12 was associated with DFS (5.889; 95%CI1.935-19.687; P=0.018) and LNR>12 with DFS and OS (17.984; 95%CI5.931-54.351; P<0.001 and 10.286; 95%CI 2.654-39.854; P=0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION LNR was associated with histological aspects of poor prognosis, regardless of the use of QRT. In the occurrence of less than 12 evaluated LNR, the LNR was associated only with the DFS. BACKGROUND • Assessment of the lymph nodes during pathological analysis of the surgical specimen is crucial to determine treatment and prognosis. BACKGROUND • Neoadjuvance therapy reduces the number of lymph nodes, being lower than recommended, therefore the lymph node ratio can be an alternative analysis for a better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Credidio
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Grupo de Coloproctologia da Disciplina de Doenças do Aparelho Digestivo, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Carlos Augusto Real Martinez
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Grupo de Coloproctologia da Disciplina de Doenças do Aparelho Digestivo, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Daniéla Oliveira Magro
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Grupo de Coloproctologia da Disciplina de Doenças do Aparelho Digestivo, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Rita Barbosa de Carvalho
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Grupo de Coloproctologia da Disciplina de Doenças do Aparelho Digestivo, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Grupo de Coloproctologia da Disciplina de Doenças do Aparelho Digestivo, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin Z, Li X, Song J, Zheng R, Chen C, Li A, Xu B. The Effect of Lymph Node Harvest on Prognosis in Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:816485. [PMID: 35242710 PMCID: PMC8886163 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between lymph node harvest and the prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS Patients who were diagnosed with clinical LARC and treated with nCRT and radical surgery between June 2008 and July 2017 were included in this study. The relationship between lymph node retrieval and prognosis was analyzed. Other lymph node-related indicators were explored. RESULTS A total of 837 patients with a median follow-up of 61 (7-139) months were included in the study. The five-year DFS and OS rates of all patients were 74.9% and 82.3%, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis suggested that dissection of ≥ 12 lymph nodes did not improve OS or DFS. 7 was selected as the best cutoff value for the total number of lymph nodes retrieved by Cox multivariate analysis (χ2 = 10.072, HR: 0.503, P=0.002). Dissection of ≥ 5 positive lymph nodes (PLNs) was an independent prognostic factor for poorer DFS (HR: 2.104, P=0.004) and OS (HR: 3.471, p<0.001). A positive lymph node ratio (LNR) of more than 0.29 was also an independent prognostic factor for poorer DFS (HR: 1.951, P=0.002) and OS (HR: 2.434, p<0.001). CONCLUSION The recommends that at least 7 harvested lymph nodes may be more appropriate for LARC patients with nCRT. PLN and LNR may be prognostic factors for LARC patients with ypN+ after nCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuangbin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,The Graduate School, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Branch of Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaobo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Medical Imaging Technology, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Union Clinical Medicine College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianyuan Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Medical Imaging Technology, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Union Clinical Medicine College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rong Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Medical Imaging Technology, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Union Clinical Medicine College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Medical Imaging Technology, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Union Clinical Medicine College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Anchuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Union Clinical Medicine College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Benhua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Medical Imaging Technology, College of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Union Clinical Medicine College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Destri G, Maugeri A, Ramistella A, La Greca G, Conti P, Trombatore G, Vecchio GM, Magro GG, Barchitta M, Agodi A. The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Updates Surg. 2020;72:793-800. [PMID: 32632764 PMCID: PMC7481149 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00841-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, at least 12 lymph nodes are required to accurately stage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) reduces the number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effect of NACRT on lymph node retrieval and prognosis in patients with LARC. We performed an observational study of 142 patients with LARC. Although our analysis was retrospective, data were collected prospectively. Half the patients were treated with NACRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) and the other half underwent TME only. The number of lymph nodes retrieved and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly reduced in the NACRT group (P > 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, only NACRT and patient age were significantly associated with reduced lymph node retrieval. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio (LNR) both had a significant effect on prognosis when the patient population was examined as a whole (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). However, the LNR was the only significant, independent prognostic factor in both treatment groups (P = 0.007 for the NACRT group; P = 0.04 for the no-NACRT group). NACRT improves patient prognosis only when the number of metastatic lymph nodes is reduced. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the LNR are important prognostic factors. Lymph node retrieval remains an indispensable tool for staging and prognostic assessment of patients with rectal carcinoma treated with NACRT.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen YT, Huang CW, Ma CJ, Tsai HL, Yeh YS, Su WC, Chai CY, Wang JY. An observational study of patho-oncological outcomes of various surgical methods in total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center analysis. BMC Surg 2020; 20:23. [PMID: 32013990 PMCID: PMC6998335 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-0687-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the treatment for rectal cancer (RC). Recently, the use of conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) or robotic-assisted surgery (RS) has been on a steady increase cases. However, various oncological outcomes from different surgical approaches are still under investigation. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study comprising 300 consecutive RC patients who underwent various techniques of TME (RS, n = 88; LS, n = 37; Open surgery, n = 175) at a single center of real world data to compare the pathological and oncological outcomes, with a median follow-up of 48 months. RESULTS Upon multivariate analysis, histologic grade (P = 0.016), and stage (P < 0.001) were the independent factors of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis determined RS, early pathologic stage, negative CRM involvement, and pathologic complete response to be significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analyses observed the surgical method (P = 0.037), histologic grade (P = 0.006), and CRM involvement (P = 0.043) were the independent factors of DFS, whereas histologic grade (P = 0.011) and pathologic stage (P = 0.022) were the independent prognostic variables of OS. CONCLUSIONS This study determined that RS TME is feasible because it has less CRM involvement and better oncological outcomes than the alternatives have. The significant factors influencing CRM and prognosis depended on the histologic grade, tumor depth, and pre-operative CCRT. RS might be an acceptable option owing to the favorable oncological outcomes for patients with RC undergoing TME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ting Chen
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wen Huang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Jen Ma
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.,Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Lin Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Sung Yeh
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan.,Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Su
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
| | - Chee-Yin Chai
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan. .,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fulop ZZ, Gurzu S, Bara T, Dragus E, Bara T, Voidazan S, Banias L, Jung I. Lymph node ratio, an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage II-III rectal carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 2019; 215:152384. [PMID: 30910253 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of the proper surgical method and the most reliable prognostic parameters of rectal carcinomas is a challenging issue. The aim of this paper was to determine the possible prognostic role of the number of harvested lymph nodes versus lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with rectal carcinomas, and the proper value of LNR that can be used as prognostic parameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed in 186 consecutive patients with rectal carcinomas that underwent surgical resection. The LNR was calculated for cases from stage II-III, and was correlated with classic prognostic parameters and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference was found between LNR of 0.15 and OS (p = 0.03), respectively LNR > 0.15 and TNM stage (p < 0.0001), but also tumor infiltration level (p < 0.05). The number of harvested lymph nodes was not correlated with the tumor stage (r = 0.148, p = 0.06) and this parameter did not influence the OS, when the number of 12 or 14 lymph nodes was used as the ideal value (p = 0.6 and p = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSION In patients with rectal carcinomas that underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, a LNR of 0.15 is a parameter with independent prognostic value, comparing with the number of harvested lymph nodes. The specific LNR should be calculated in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsolt Zoltan Fulop
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania; Department of Pathology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Simona Gurzu
- Department of Pathology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania; Department of Pathology, CCAMF - Research Center, Targu Mures, Romania.
| | - Tivadar Bara
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Emoke Dragus
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Tivadar Bara
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Septimiu Voidazan
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Laura Banias
- Department of Pathology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Ioan Jung
- Department of Pathology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jin C, Deng X, Li Y, He W, Yang X, Liu J. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 2018; 11:169-175. [PMID: 29998594 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With neoadjuvant therapy increasingly used in advanced rectal cancer, the lymph node ratio (LNR) has been strongly considered to indicate cancer-specific survival in recent years, and a comprehensive evaluation of a large number of studies is deficient. The objective of our study is to pool enough eligible studies to assess the relationship between LNR and prognosis of advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS A systematic search was done in the PubMed and EmBase databases (through 1 March 2017) that reported LNR in colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. The first two authors independently conducted the study selection and data extraction. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 13.0 (College Station, Texas). RESULTS Thirteen studies with 4023 participants were included in the meta-analysis, and all were published after 2011. A high LNR was assessed to be a predictor of poor overall survival in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 2.94, 95% CI:1.97 to 3.91, P < 0.001). Similarly, a high LNR was related to poor disease-free survival (HR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.82 to 3.85, P < 0.001). With respect to recurrence, the HRs of 3.25, 1.93, and 2.11 also showed a strong relationship between high LNR and poor local, distant, and total recurrences. CONCLUSIONS Our present study demonstrates that a high LNR can predict poor survival in advanced rectal cancer. We suggest well-designed clinical trials to prospectively assess LNR as an independent predictor of rectal cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengwu Jin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wanbin He
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xuyang Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ceelen W, Willaert W, Varewyck M, Libbrecht S, Goetghebeur E, Pattyn P. Effect of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose and Schedule on Nodal Count and Its Prognostic Impact in Stage II-III Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3899-3906. [PMID: 27380639 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5363-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown how neoadjuvant treatment schedule affects lymph node count (LNC) and lymph node ratio (LNR) and how these correlate with overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer (RC). METHODS Data were used from the Belgian PROCARE rectal cancer registry on RC patients treated with surgery alone, short-term radiotherapy with immediate surgery (SRT), or chemoradiation with deferred surgery (CRT). The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on LNC was examined using Poisson log-linear analysis. The association of LNC and LNR with overall survival (OS) was studied using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Data from 4037 patients were available. Compared with surgery alone, LNC was reduced by 12.3 % after SRT and by 31.3 % after CRT (p < 0.001). In patients with surgery alone, the probability of finding node-positive disease increased with LNC, while after SRT and CRT no increase was noted for more than 12 and 18 examined nodes, respectively. Per node examined, we found a decrease in hazard of death of 2.7 % after surgery alone and 1.5 % after SRT, but no effect after CRT. In stage III patients, the LNR but not (y)pN stage was significantly correlated with OS regardless of neoadjuvant therapy. Specifically, a LNR > 0.4 was associated with a significantly worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS Nodal counts are reduced in a schedule-dependent manner by neoadjuvant treatment in RC. After chemoradiation, the LNC does not confer any prognostic information. A LNR of >0.4 is associated with a significantly worse outcome in stage III disease, regardless of neoadjuvant therapy type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Ceelen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Machteld Varewyck
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sasha Libbrecht
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|