ACR appropriateness criteria nonsurgical treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: poor performance status or palliative intent

Thirty-day mortality after palliative radiotherapy in advanced cancer patients: Optimizing end-of-life care in Asia

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based guidelines recommend hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy (PRT); nonetheless, many patients receive prolonged course of PRT. To identify patients with limited benefits from PRT in end-of-life care, we evaluated the pattern of PRT at an Asian institution and factors associated with 30-day mortality after PRT (30dM).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 228 patients who died after PRT in Yonsei Wonju Severance Christian hospital between October 2014 and March 2022. The associations between clinical factors and survival were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards method. Survival was analysed using the existing models to evaluate their performance in our cohort.

RESULTS

The median PRT duration was 13 (IQR, 7-15) days. Only 11.4% of the patients were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy. One-third of the patients (32.9%) could not complete PRT and 39 (17.1%) died during PRT. The 30dM was 31.6%. The median time from PRT to death was 17 (IQR, 11-23) days for the patients who died within 30 days. The number of involved organs (≤2 vs. >2; P < 0.001), albumin level (<3.3 vs. ≥3.3; P = 0.016), admission during PRT (P < 0.001), admission 3 months before PRT (P = 0.036) and ICU care during PRT (P < 0.001) were prognostic factors. A comparison of survival based on the existing models yielded unsatisfactory results in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

Almost one-third of the patients received PRT in the last 30 days of life. The use of hypofractionation for PRT was low in this Asian population. Further research is necessary to develop a predictive model of early mortality, allowing tailored end-of-life care for Asian patients.

Penetrating the evidence of EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

The brain is a common metastatic site in lung cancer. Approximately one-third of patients will develop brain metastases during the course of their disease. Median overall survival has been reported between 3 and 14.8 months in patients with brain metastases compared to other metastatic sites. In addition, the lifetime incidence of brain metastases is increasing due to prolonged survival seen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients due to new systemic therapies and improved neuro-imaging techniques. Several targeted therapies-such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptors and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-are active in NSCLC and have data to suggested possible effectiveness against brain metastases in these patients.

Systemic Inflammation Biomarkers Predict Survival in Patients of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy - A Single Center Experience

Background: Increasing evidence indicates a relationship between systemic inflammation and survival following treatment in various tumors. However, the correlation of systematic inflammation with survival after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well established.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with newly diagnosed early stage NSCLC treated with SABR in a single institution from 2011 to 2015. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte- monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated as systemic inflammation biomarkers. Overall survival (OS) was the first end-point. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to determine cut-off points for OS. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression were used to investigate the potential factors associated with OS.

Results: In the 63 patients who were eligible for analysis. The median follow up after SBRT was 29.5 months (range 8-67 months) while the 3-year OS was 74.2%. Based on ROC analysis, optimal cut-off values of NLR, PLR, and LMR were 2.06, 199.55 and 4.0, respectively. Significant survival benefit was found in the NLR ≤2.06 group (p=0.028), PLR≤199.55 group (p=0.001), and LMR˃4.0 group (p=0.046). Univariate analysis indicated that low NLR (p=0.011), low PLR (p=0.003), and high LMR (p=0.014) were correlated with improved survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that high PLR (p=0.033) and low LMR (p=0.046) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival.

Conclusions: In patients of early stage NSCLC who received SABR, pretreatment NLR, PLR, and LMR could be considered useful prognostic indicators of OS. These metrics may provide reliable and convenient predictors to identify patients who would benefit from SABR.

Preliminary comparison of the registration effect of 4D-CBCT and 3D-CBCT in image-guided radiotherapy of Stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer

In this study, we compared the registration effectiveness of 4D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D-CBCT for image-guided radiotherapy in 20 Stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients underwent 4D-CBCT and 3D-CBCT immediately before radiotherapy, and the X-ray Volume Imaging software system was used for image registration. We performed automatic bone registration and soft tissue registration between 4D-CBCT or 3D-CBCT and 4D-CT images; the regions of interest (ROIs) were the vertebral body on the layer corresponding to the tumor and the internal target volume region. The relative displacement of the gross tumor volume between the 4D-CBCT end-expiratory phase sequence and 4D-CT was used to evaluate the registration error. Among the 20 patients (12 males, 8 females; 35-67 years old; median age, 52 years), 3 had central NSCLC and 17 had peripheral NSCLC, 8 in the upper or middle lobe and 12 in the lower lobe (maximum tumor diameter range, 18-27 mm). The internal motion range in three-dimensional space was 12.52 ± 2.65 mm, accounting for 47.8 ± 15.3% of the maximum diameter of each tumor. The errors of image-guided registration using 4D-CBCT and 3D-CBCT on the x (left-right), y (superior-inferior), z (anterior-posterior) axes, and 3D space were 0.80 ± 0.21 mm and 1.08 ± 0.25 mm, 2.02 ± 0.46 mm and 3.30 ± 0.53 mm, 0.52 ± 0.16 mm and 0.85 ± 0.24 mm, and 2.25 ± 0.44 mm and 3.59 ± 0.48 mm (all P < 0.001), respectively. Thus, 4D-CBCT is preferable to 3D-CBCT for image guidance in small pulmonary tumors because 4D-CBCT can reduce the uncertainty in the tumor location resulting from internal motion caused by respiratory movements, thereby increasing the image-guidance accuracy.

Radiotherapy prolongs the survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergone to an immune-modulating treatment with dose-fractioned cisplatin and metronomic etoposide and bevacizumab (mPEBev)

Radiotherapy (RT), together with a direct cytolytic effect on tumor tissue, also elicits systemic immunological events, which sometimes result in the regression of distant metastases (abscopal effect). We have shown the safety and anti-tumor activity of a novel metronomic chemotherapy (mCH) regimen with dose-fractioned cisplatin, oral etoposide and bevacizumab, a mAb against the vasculo-endothelial-growth-factor (mPEBev regimen), in metastatic non-small-cell-lung cancer (mNSCLC). This regimen, designed on the results of translational studies, showed immune-modulating effects that could trigger and empower the immunological effects associated with tumor irradiation. In order to assess this, we carried out a retrospective analysis in a subset of 69 consecutive patients who received the mPEBev regimen within the BEVA2007 trial. Forty-five of these patients, also received palliative RT of one or more metastatic sites. Statistical analysis (a Log-rank test) revealed a much longer median survival in the group of patients who received RT [mCH vs mCH + RT: 12.1 +/-2.5 (95%CI 3.35-8.6) vs 22.12 +/-4.3 (95%CI 11.9-26.087) months; P=0.015] with no difference in progression-free survival. In particular, their survival correlated with the mPEBev regimen ability to induce the percentage of activated dendritic cells (DCs) (CD3-CD11b+CD15-CD83+CD80+) [Fold to baseline value (FBV) ≤1 vs >1: 4+/-5.389 (95%CI,0- 14.56) vs 56+/-23.05 (95%CI,10.8-101.2) months; P:0.049)] and central-memory- T-cells (CD3+CD8+CD45RA-CCR7+) [FBV ≤ 1 vs >1: 8+/-5.96 (95%CI,0-19.68) vs 31+/-12.3 (95%CI,6.94-55.1) months; P:0.045]. These results suggest that tumor irradiation may prolong the survival of NSCLC patients undergone mPEBev regimen presumably by eliciting an immune-mediated effect and provide the rationale for further perspective clinical studies.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer

PURPOSE

To update brachytherapy recommendations for pretreatment evaluation, treatment, and dosimetric issues for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in thoracic brachytherapy updated recommendations for thoracic brachytherapy based on literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines recommend the use of endobronchial brachytherapy for disease palliation in patients with central obstructing lesions, particularly in patients who have previously received external beam radiotherapy. The use of interstitial implants after incomplete resection may improve outcomes and provide enhanced palliation. Early reports support the use of CT-guided intratumoral volume implants within clinical studies. The use of brachytherapy routinely after sublobar resection is not generally recommended, unless within the confines of a clinical trial or a registry.

CONCLUSIONS

American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for thoracic brachytherapy are provided. Practitioners are encouraged to follow these guidelines and to develop further clinical trials to examine this treatment modality to increase the evidence base for its use.

Prevalence and Predictors of Inappropriate Delivery of Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy for Metastatic Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

High-level evidence has established well-recognized standard treatment regimens for patients undergoing palliative chest radiotherapy (RT) for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including treating with fewer than 15 fractions of RT, and not delivering concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) because of its increased toxicity and limited efficacy in the palliative setting.

METHODS

The study included patients in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012 with stage IV lung cancer who received palliative chest radiation therapy. Logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of standard vs nonstandard regimens (>15 fractions or CRT). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

There were 46 803 patients in the analysis and 49% received radiotherapy for longer than 15 fractions, and 28% received greater than 25 fractions. Approximately 19% received CRT. The strongest independent predictors of long-course RT were private insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40 vs uninsured, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 1.53) and treatment in community cancer programs (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.38 to 1.58) compared with academic research programs. The strongest factors that predicted for concurrent chemoradiotherapy were private insurance (OR = 1.38 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.54) compared with uninsured patients and treatment in community cancer programs (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.33 to 1.56) compared with academic programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of all patients with metastatic lung cancer received a higher number of radiation fractions than recommended. Patients with private insurance and treated in community cancer centers were more likely to receive longer courses of RT or CRT. This demonstrates that a substantial number of patients requiring palliative thoracic radiotherapy are overtreated and further work is necessary to ensure these patients are treated according to evidenced-based guidelines.

Comparative effectiveness of aggressive thoracic radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy in metastatic lung cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness of radiation dose escalation and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in a population-based cohort of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer who underwent palliative thoracic radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The cohort consisted of 27,063 patients in the National Cancer Database with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with thoracic RT between 20 and 55 Gy in 2004 to 2011. High- versus intermediate- vs low-dose (HD vs ID vs LD, respectively) RT was defined as biologically effective dose above 50 Gy, between 35 and 50 Gy, and below 35 Gy, respectively. Among patients who received any chemotherapy, separate analyses were performed to examine the impact of CCRT on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 3.9 months for the entire cohort and 18 months for surviving patients. The 5 most common treatment schemes were 30/10 (Gy/fraction, 23% of entire cohort), 35/14 (8%), 37.5/15 (7%), 40/20 (3%), and 50/20 (3%). On multivariable analysis, the survival hazard ratios (HRs) for HD and ID compared with LD RT were 0.37 and 0.51, respectively (P < .0001). Propensity score matching found a superior survival benefit for ID and HD (HR, 0.41 and 0.57 for HD and ID RT, respectively, vs LD, P < .0001). Among those who received any chemotherapy (59% of total), the median OS for patients treated with CCRT (19% of total) was 5.3 versus 5.6 months (P = .667). On multivariable analysis, the HR for CCRT was 1.01 (P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

The delivery of higher-dose RT but not concurrent chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement of OS. This population-based study supports higher-dose palliative regimens and motivates prospective study of escalation beyond a biologically effective dose of 35 Gy.

The Refusal of Palliative Radiation in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Prognostic Implications

CONTEXT

Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have limited survival. Population studies have evaluated the impact of radiation refusal in the curative setting; however, no data exist concerning the prognostic impact of radiation refusal in the palliative care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the patterns of radiation refusal in newly diagnosed patients with metastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with Stage IV NSCLC diagnosed between 1988 and 2010 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors for refusal of radiation and the impact of radiation and refusal on survival in the palliative setting.

RESULTS

A total of 285,641 patients were initially included in the analysis. Palliative radiation was recommended in 42% and refused by 3.1% of patients. Refusal rates remained consistent across included years of study. On multivariate analysis, older, nonblack/nonwhite, unmarried females were more likely to refuse radiation (P < 0.001 in all cases). Median survival for patients refusing radiation was three months vs. five months for those receiving radiation and two months for those whom radiation was not recommended.

CONCLUSION

Patients with metastatic NSCLC who refuse recommended palliative radiation have a poor survival. Radiation refusal or the recommendation against treatment can serve as a trigger for integrating palliative care services sooner and contributes greatly to prognostic awareness. Further investigation into this survival difference and the factors behind refusal are warranted.

[Irradiation in stereotactic conditions: prerequisites]

Indications of treatment by stereotactic body radiotherapy are dramatically increasing due to new potential indications. The conditions associated with the treatment delivery are multiple. The first step of the process is crucial. It is related to the validation of the indication proposed during the multidisciplinary meeting as regard the evidence-based proof of the concept. These emerging techniques mainly extracranial stereotactic body irradiation do not benefit from long-term evaluation in terms of efficiency as well as normal tissue late toxicities. Priority should be given to prospective independent clinical trials, validated by an independent scientific committee, performed under a relevant and well dedicated multicentric quality assurance program aiming to improve knowledge and selection of indications. The SFRO is still working with others professionals on the definition of the conditions for the implementation of such treatments and actively collaborates with the authorities to define the appropriate conditions to preserve the quality of the treatment delivery under these specific conditions.