1
|
Mazza DF, Boonsri PS, Arora A, Bayne CO, Szabo RM, Chaudhari AJ, Boutin RD. Relationships between diagnostic imaging of first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis and pain, functional status, and disease progression: A systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2024; 32:476-492. [PMID: 38141842 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the association of pain, function, and progression in first carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) with imaging biomarkers and radiography-based staging. DESIGN Database searches in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, along with citation searching were conducted in accordance with published guidance. Data on the association of imaging with pain, functional status, and disease progression were extracted and synthesized, along with key information on study methodology such as sample sizes, use of control subjects, study design, number of image raters, and blinding. Methodological quality was assessed using National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools. RESULTS After duplicate removal, a total of 1969 records were screened. Forty-six articles are included in this review, covering a total of 28,202 study participants, 7263 with first CMC OA. Osteophytes were found to be one of the strongest biomarkers for pain across imaging modalities. Radiographic findings alone showed conflicting relationships with pain. However, Kellgren-Lawrence staging showed consistent associations with pain in various studies. Radiographic, sonographic, and MRI findings and staging showed little association to tools evaluating functional status across imaging modalities. The same imaging methods showed limited ability to predict progression of first CMC OA. A major limitation was the heterogeneity in the study base, limiting synthesis of results. CONCLUSION Imaging findings and radiography-based staging systems generally showed strong associations with pain, but not with functional status or disease progression. More research and improved imaging techniques are needed to help physicians better manage patients with first CMC OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario F Mazza
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| | | | - Aman Arora
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Christopher O Bayne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Robert M Szabo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| | | | - Robert D Boutin
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Normand M, Ibrahim M, Morsy M, Brismée JM, Sobczak S. The trapeziometacarpal screw home torque mechanism as a clinical indicator of the posterior joint ligament complex integrity: A cadaveric investigation. J Hand Ther 2023:S0894-1130(23)00120-5. [PMID: 37793968 DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, no clinical test provides specific objective information on the integrity of key ligamentous support of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint. PURPOSE To examine the potential of the TMC joint screw home torque mechanism (SHTM) in estimating the integrity of the posterior ligament complex in older adult population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional laboratory-based study. METHODS Twenty cadaver hands presenting with various degrees of TMC joint degradation ranging from none to severe osteoarthritis (OA) were radiographed in multiple positions to establish their degeneration status, joint mobility, and amount of dorsal subluxation at rest and with the application of the SHTM. Comparisons and correlations between degeneration status, joint mobility, subluxation reduction and ligament status obtained from dissection were calculated. RESULTS No significant statistical correlation was demonstrated with the subluxation reduction ratio of the SHTM and the combined ligament complex value however, a moderate negative correlation was found with dorsal central ligament injury at 21 Nm (τb = -0.46, p < 0.05) and 34 Nm (τb = -0.45, p < 0.05). A statistically significant reduction of radial subluxation of the TMC joint was observed between the subluxation at rest (M = 5.2, SD = 1.9) and subluxation with SHTM of 21 Nm (M = 4.4, SD = 2.4), t (19) = 3.2, p = 0.01, 95% CI [0.3, 1.4] and subluxation with SHTM of 34 Nm (M = 4.3, SD = 2.6), t (19) = 2.6, p = 0.02, 95% CI [0.2, 1.5]. CONCLUSION Our results did not support the SHTM as indicator of the TMC posterior ligament complex integrity however, it demonstrated 100% stabilization effect with non-arthritic TMC population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirka Normand
- Département d'Anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada; Chaire de Recherche en Anatomie Fonctionnelle, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada; Rehabilitation Department, Pequot Health Center, Yale New Haven Health System, Groton, CT, USA.
| | - Mariam Ibrahim
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health Professions, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA; Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Morsy
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jean-Michel Brismée
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health Professions, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Stéphane Sobczak
- Département d'Anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada; Chaire de Recherche en Anatomie Fonctionnelle, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morton AM, Moore DC, Ladd AL, Weiss APC, Molino J, Crisco JJ. Dorsal Subluxation of the First Metacarpal During Thumb Flexion is an Indicator of Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Progression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:1224-1237. [PMID: 36877171 PMCID: PMC10194679 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurable changes in patients with progression of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) include joint space narrowing, osteophyte formation, subluxation, and adjacent-tissue changes. Subluxation, an indication of mechanical instability, is postulated as an early biomechanical indicator of progressing CMC OA. Various radiographic views and hand postures have been proposed to best assess CMC subluxation, but 3D measurements derived from CT images serve as the optimal metric. However, we do not know which thumb pose yields subluxation that most indicates OA progression. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES Using osteophyte volume as a quantitative measure of OA progression, we asked: (1) Does dorsal subluxation vary by thumb pose, time, and disease severity in patients with thumb CMC OA? (2) In which thumb pose(s) does dorsal subluxation most differentiate patients with stable CMC OA from those with progressing CMC OA? (3) In those poses, what values of dorsal subluxation indicate a high likelihood of CMC OA progression? METHODS Between 2011 and 2014, 743 patients were seen at our institutions for trapeziometacarpal pain. We considered individuals who were between the ages of 45 and 75 years, had tenderness to palpation or a positive grind test result, and had modified Eaton Stage 0 or 1 radiographic thumb CMC OA as potentially eligible for enrollment. Based on these criteria, 109 patients were eligible. Of the eligible patients, 19 were excluded because of a lack of interest in study participation, and another four were lost before the minimum study follow-up or had incomplete datasets, leaving 86 (43 female patients with a mean age of 53 ± 6 years and 43 male patients with a mean age of 60 ± 7 years) patients for analysis. Twenty-five asymptomatic participants (controls) aged 45 to 75 years were also prospectively recruited to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria for controls included an absence of thumb pain and no evidence of CMC OA during clinical examination. Of the 25 recruited controls, three were lost to follow-up, leaving 22 for analysis (13 female patients with a mean age of 55 ± 7 years and nine male patients with a mean age of 58 ± 9 years). Over the 6-year study period, CT images were acquired of patients and controls in 11 thumb poses: neutral, adduction, abduction, flexion, extension, grasp, jar, pinch, grasp loaded, jar loaded, and pinch loaded. CT images were acquired at enrollment (Year 0) and Years 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 for patients and at Years 0 and 6 for controls. From the CT images, bone models of the first metacarpal (MC1) and trapezium were segmented, and coordinate systems were calculated from their CMC articular surfaces. The volar-dorsal location of the MC1 relative to the trapezium was computed and normalized for bone size. Patients were categorized into stable OA and progressing OA subgroups based on trapezial osteophyte volume. MC1 volar-dorsal location was analyzed by thumb pose, time, and disease severity using linear mixed-effects models. Data are reported as the mean and 95% confidence interval. Differences in volar-dorsal location at enrollment and rate of migration during the study were analyzed for each thumb pose by group (control, stable OA, and progressing OA). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of MC1 location was used to identify thumb poses that differentiated patients whose OA was stable from those whose OA was progressing. The Youden J statistic was used to determine optimized cutoff values of subluxation from those poses to be tested as indicators of OA progression. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values were calculated to assess the performance of pose-specific cutoff values of MC1 locations as indicators of progressing OA. RESULTS In flexion, the MC1 locations were volar to the joint center in patients with stable OA (mean -6.2% [95% CI -8.8% to -3.6%]) and controls (mean -6.1% [95% CI -8.9% to -3.2%]), while patients with progressing OA exhibited dorsal subluxation (mean 5.0% [95% CI 1.3% to 8.6%]; p < 0.001). The pose associated with the most rapid MC1 dorsal subluxation in the progressing OA group was thumb flexion (mean 3.2% [95% CI 2.5% to 3.9%] increase per year). In contrast, the MC1 migrated dorsally much slower in the stable OA group (p < 0.001), at only a mean of 0.1% (95% CI -0.4% to 0.6%) per year. A cutoff value of 1.5% for the volar MC1 position during flexion at enrollment (C-statistic: 0.70) was a moderate indicator of OA progression, with a high positive predictive value (0.80) but low negative predictive value (0.54). Positive and negative predictive values of subluxation rate in flexion (2.1% per year) were high (0.81 and 0.81, respectively). The metric that most indicated a high likelihood of OA progression (sensitivity 0.96, negative predictive value 0.89) was a dual cutoff that combined the subluxation rate in flexion (2.1% per year) with that of loaded pinch (1.2% per year). CONCLUSION In the thumb flexion pose, only the progressing OA group exhibited MC1 dorsal subluxation. The MC1 location cutoff value for progression in flexion was 1.5% volar to the trapezium , which suggests that dorsal subluxation of any amount in this pose indicates a high likelihood of thumb CMC OA progression. However, volar MC1 location in flexion alone was not sufficient to rule out progression. The availability of longitudinal data improved our ability to identify patients whose disease will likely remain stable. In patients whose MC1 location during flexion changed < 2.1% per year and whose MC1 location during pinch loading changed < 1.2% per year, the confidence that their disease would remain stable throughout the 6-year study period was very high. These cutoff rates were a lower limit, and any patients whose dorsal subluxation advanced faster than 2% to 1% per year in their respective hand poses, were highly likely to experience progressive disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Our findings suggest that in patients with early signs of CMC OA, nonoperative interventions aimed to reduce further dorsal subluxation or operative treatments that spare the trapezium and limit subluxation may be effective. It remains to be determined whether our subluxation metrics can be rigorously computed from more widely available technologies, such as plain radiography or ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M. Morton
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Douglas C. Moore
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Amy L. Ladd
- Robert A. Chase Hand & Upper Limb Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Arnold-Peter C. Weiss
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/University Orthopedics, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Janine Molino
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/University Orthopedics, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Joseph J. Crisco
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Basilar thumb arthritis is a debilitating condition characterized by pain, reduced joint stability, and reduced capacity for daily activities. Various arthroscopic approaches have been described based on patient factors, as well as radiographic and arthroscopic staging criteria. Here we provide an overview of arthroscopic management of basilar thumb arthritis, including patient evaluation, surgical techniques, outcomes, and new developments. We describe our preferred approach for Eaton stage I-III disease, consisting of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty. This technique is safe, reliable, and allows for early range of motion and quicker recovery while minimizing scarring and reducing the risk of nerve injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janos Barrera
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Yao
- Robert A. Chase Hand and Upper Limb Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Teunissen JS, Wouters RM, Bierma-Zeintra SMA, van Meurs JBJ, Schreuders TAR, Zuidam JM, Selles RW. The prevalence, incidence, and progression of radiographic thumb base osteoarthritis in a population-based cohort: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:578-585. [PMID: 35066174 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the prevalence, incidence, and progression of radiographic thumb carpometacarpal (CMC-1) and trapezioscaphoid (TS) radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA) in the general Dutch population aged ≥55y. DESIGN Data were from the first and second cohort of the Rotterdam Study (1990-2005, 4-12 years follow-up, age 55+). Participants underwent bilateral radiographs at baseline (N = 7792) and follow-up (N = 3804), read for Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade. ROA was defined on the joint level as K-L grade ≥2. The prevalence was assessed at baseline, incidence at follow-up in those free of ROA at baseline, and progression in those with ROA. Differences based on sex and age were evaluated using logistic regression models. RESULTS At baseline, 1977 (25.3%) had CMC-1 ROA and 1133 (14.5%) TS ROA. The prevalence was higher in females for CMC-1 (aOR = 1.98 95%CI [1.77-2.21]) and TS ROA (aOR = 2.00 [1.74-2.29]) and increased for every year of age (CMC-1 ROA 1.08 [1.07-1.08]) (TS ROA 1.06 [1.05-1.07]). Most (437/512; 85.4%) incident cases of CMC-1 ROA (2994 at risk) were mild (K-L = 2), whereas most (145/167; 86,8%) incident cases of TS ROA (3311 at risk) were moderate to severe (K-L = 3/4). CMC-1 ROA progression was mostly (88/100; 88.0%) seen in the K-L 2 group at baseline, whereas that was (4/17; 23.5%) for TS ROA. CONCLUSION CMC-1 ROA and TS ROA are prevalent in the general Dutch population. While incident CMC-1 ROA was primarily mild, incident TS ROA was more often moderate to severe. CMC-1 ROA was a strong predictor for incident TS ROA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Teunissen
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Radboudumc, 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - R M Wouters
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Hand Therapy, Handtherapie Nederland, the Netherlands.
| | - S M A Bierma-Zeintra
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J B J van Meurs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - T A R Schreuders
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J M Zuidam
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - R W Selles
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|