Medialized repair for retracted rotator cuff tears

All-arthroscopic supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle advancement leads to high healing rate and excellent outcomes in patients with massive, retracted rotator cuff tears, even in patients with pseudoparalysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of an all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique involving muscle advancement and double-layer lasso loop (DLLL) repair for massive, retracted posterosuperior cuff tears.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of patients with massive, retracted posterosuperior cuff tears who underwent the all-arthroscopic muscle advancement technique from March 2017 to September 2021, with minimum follow-up of 12 months. Key steps included suprascapular nerve release, advancement of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, and DLLL repair. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, active range of motion (ROM), and strength were compared. Preoperative and postoperative structural radiological characteristics were analysed.

RESULTS

Forty-three shoulders in 38 patients were evaluated with mean follow-up of 18.8 months (range 12-55 months). Of the 43 shoulders, 4 repairs failed (9.3% retear rate). VAS, ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores significantly improved (p<0.001) in patients who demonstrated healing on postoperative MRI (n=39). ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores were significantly better in the healed group, with 100% exceeding MCIDs for ASES and UCLA scores, and 84.2% for Constant score. A lower proportion of patients in the retear group achieved MCIDs. Active ROM in all planes significantly improved for those who had healed repairs. (p<0.001). Relative strengths of abduction, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus were at least 90% of the contralateral side. Recovery rate of pseudoparalysis (7 patients) was 100%.

CONCLUSION

All-arthroscopic muscle advancement, coupled with double-layer lasso loop repair, leads to a high healing rate with excellent clinical outcomes and recovery of strength to at least 90%, even in patients with pseudoparalysis.

Clinical outcomes of medialized single-row repair with fascia lata graft augmentation for large and massive rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

A high postoperative retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of large and massive tears remains a problem. This study evaluated rotator cuff integrity after ARCR with fascia lata graft augmentation for large and massive rotator cuff tears and compared clinical outcomes between patients with intact repairs and retears.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with rotator cuff tears who could not undergo primary repair due to tendon retraction underwent arthroscopic medialized single-row repair with fascia lata graft augmentation. The patients' minimum follow-up was 2 (2-9) years. Supraspinatus cuff integrity was evaluated postoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with intact repairs vs. retears based on the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Constant, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. We also evaluated their range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength.

RESULTS

Retears were observed in 11 of 45 patients. UCLA, Constant, and JOA scores significantly improved postoperatively compared to preoperatively in the intact repair (all P < .001) and retear (all P < .036) groups. The intact repair group had significantly higher Constant (75.6 [mean] ± 9.9 [SD] vs. 69.8 ± 7.9; P = .026) and JOA (94.4 ± 6.9 vs. 89.8 ± 5.9; P = .041) scores than the retear group. Forward elevation, abduction, and the strengths of abduction and external rotation significantly improved in the intact repair group (all P < .003) but not in the retear group (all P > .05). The intact repair group had significantly higher postoperative forward flexion (165° ± 15° vs. 154° ± 23°; P = .036), abduction (164° ± 17° vs. 151° ± 26°; P = .029), and abduction strength (3.5 ± 2.2 kg vs. 2.3 ± 1.2 kg; P = .017) than the retear group. In the intact repair group (n = 34), Sugaya type I:II ratio differed significantly between postoperative 3 months (2:32) and 24 months (24:10) (P < .001). Repaired tendon thickness did not decrease significantly between 3 months (7.1 mm) and 2 years (6.9 mm) (P = .543).

CONCLUSIONS

ARCR with fascia lata graft augmentation of large and massive rotator cuff tears showed a 24.4% retear rate but significantly improved the clinical scores, ROMs, and muscle strength with excellent cuff integrity in the intact repair group. However, the differences in the Constant and UCLA scores between the intact repair and retear groups were under the minimal clinically important difference, and their clinical significance is uncertain. Our results confirm that ARCR with fascia lata graft augmentation improves patients' postoperative outcomes if the repair site is maintained postoperatively.

The effect of medial shift of supraspinatus tendon on the glenohumeral joint motion-a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

Full-thickness retracted massive supraspinatus tears are a challenge for arthroscopic surgeons where multiple options for treatment exist, but medializing the attachment is a relatively easy procedure for which a decision can be taken intraoperatively. We investigate the viability of MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten freshly thawed cadavers were taken and dissected. The supraspinatus tendon was resected, and then its attachment was progressively medialized. The range of motion (abduction, internal and external rotation) was recorded and compared. As a result, we noted a statistically significant decrease in abduction, internal and external rotation with progressive medialization of the supraspinatus insertion.

CONCLUSION

Medialized repair of the supraspinatus can be performed only to an extent beyond which it compromises glenohumeral motion. We noted a statistically significant decrease in ROM with even a 3 mm medialization of the tendon, but the acceptable medialization has to be determined on a case-to-case basis.

Extreme Medialized Repair for Challenging Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Reveals Healing and Significant Functional Improvement

PURPOSE

To evaluate range of motion, muscle strength, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results of the extreme medialized procedure on rotator cuff tears that were initially irreparable.

METHODS

From arthroscopic rotator cuff repair cases performed at our institution (June 2017 and August 2020), we retrospectively reviewed cases in which the rotator cuff was (1) unable to be withdrawn to the greater tuberosity, (2) repaired using the extreme medialized procedure, and (3) followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Patients with a history of previous surgery were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative scores were used for clinical evaluation. Imaging evaluation used 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients met the criteria; mean age 68.2 ± 7.9 (range 51-82) years; mean follow-up period 26 ± 2 (24-37) months. Tear size: 45 ± 7.1 (30-70) mm in medial to lateral diameters, 40 ± 9.3 (30-60) mm in anteroposterior diameter; suture anchor number: 5.5 ± 1.2 (4-8). The visual analog scale score (50.7 to 11.8), the University of California, Los Angeles, score (12 to 31), constant score (45 to 31), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (53 to 31) at the final follow-up improved compared with preoperative values (all P < .0001). Preoperative and postoperative changes in range of motion also showed improvement in anterior elevation (107° to 151°, P < .0001), abduction (100° to 154°, P < .0001), external rotation (41° to 47°, P = .0238), and internal rotation (L1 to Th10, P < .0001). Muscle strength was also improved in abduction (from 1.9 kg to 5.0 kg, P < .0001) and external rotation (from 3.5 kg to 7.7 kg, P < .0001). MR imaging evaluation revealed 2 cases (3.1%) of retears that fell into type 4 Sugaya classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Extremely medialized repair of large and massive tears not able to be repaired using conventional techniques led to improved clinical outcomes compared to preoperative conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Editorial Commentary: Extreme Medial Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears With Atrophy Warrants Caution: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul

Medialization of the rotator cuff insertion as a technique to manage massive rotator cuff tears has been described for decades. However, "extreme medialization" as a means to manage massive rotator cuff tears with significant atrophy warrants caution. Nonanatomic reconstruction almost always carries a price. Biomechanical studies show extreme medialization results in significant and obligate restriction of motion, and it is difficult to imagine how extreme medialization would allow normal clinical motion without substantial scapulothoracic compensation. Similarly, obligatory loss of strength could be expected. Based on the current evidence, I will not indicate this technique for my own patients at the present time.

Medialized Rip-Stop Convergence Technique for Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears

Attempts to restore the anatomical footprint during rotator cuff repair for retracted, relatively immobile tears can be difficult. In some cases, it can lead to excessive tension of the repair. Previous studies have noted improved clinical outcomes when repair tension is not excessive, and medialization of the anatomical footprint has been suggested as a technique that can help surgeons repair large, retracted tears without excessive tension and achieve improved clinical outcomes. Of note, excessive tension when restoring the rotator cuff tendon to the anatomical footprint is not limited to large, retracted tears. In some cases, restoring small- and medium-sized tears to the anatomical footprint also can lead to excessive tension. Therefore, it is not uncommon for the authors to employ some degree of footprint medialization even for repair of small- or medium-sized tears if repair to the anatomical footprint will lead to excess tension. The purpose of this article and video demonstration is to provide instruction for a reproducible rotator cuff technique using a medialized single-row rip-stop construct combined with convergence.

Medialized rotator cuff repair for retracted, massive, postero superior tears: Clinical and radiological outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The footprint medialization allows a tension free repair in severely retracted rotator cuff tears (RCT), thereby de-creasing the rate of retear. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results in a cohort of chronic RCT treated with medialized repair. Secondary purpose was to analyze the impact of medialization length on shoulder function and tendon healing.

HYPOTHESIS

It was hypothesized that the medialization length would have an impact on clinical and radiological outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A consecutive series of thirty patients that underwent arthroscopic repair of a massive posterosuperior RCT at a single institution were retrospectively studied at mean follow-up 18.4months (SD 15.3; range 9-58). The medialization of the medial footprint was measured intraoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative examination included active range of motion, abduction strength, pain assessment, and functional scores. The postoperative rotator cuff integrity was evaluated according to the Sugaya's classification. Types IV-V were categorized as absence of healing.

RESULTS

At final follow-up the clinical outcomes were significantly improved in all patients (p≤0.001) with the exception of external rotation that displayed no significant improvement (p=0.05). In group 1 (n=8) medialization length was≤10mm (mean 8, SD 1.9) and in group 2 (n=14)>10mm (mean 12.6, SD 1.7). There were no significant differences regarding preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes (p>0.05) between two groups. Group 2 demonstrated moderate correlation between length of medialization and Sugaya stage of tendon healing (r=0.53, p=0.049). Absence of healing was noted in 4/22 patients, 1/8 in group 1 and 3/14 in group 2.

DISCUSSION

Medialized repair is an effective technique for treating chronic, massive and retracted posterosuperior RCT. A medialization of the footprint less than or equal to 10mm is recommended, as it was associated with good clinical and radiological results. The rate of tendon healing decreases when medialization exceeds 10mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction with Tensor Fascia Lata Allograft for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes for a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To confirm the radiologic and clinical outcomes after performing arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) using a tensor fascia lata (TFL) allograft.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears were treated with ASCR with a TFL allograft. The mean age and follow-up period were 62 years and 20.1 months, respectively. TFL allografts were used as 3, 4, and 6 layers, and the graft thickness was 3.7, 3.9, and 5.4 mm, respectively. Range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant score were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up. The pre-, postoperative, and final acromiohumeral distances (AHD) were compared. The graft integrity was checked through a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Torn grafts were identified in 6 cases (19%). AHD significantly increased from 5.0 to 8.0 mm postoperatively (P < .0001). However, there was no significant difference of 5.0 mm at the final follow-up AHD. Five cases (83%) of torn grafts were induced in the 3-layered graft sheet group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .067). Visual analog scale, forward elevation, internal rotation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant scores significantly improved at the last follow-up. Two cases of early infection were confirmed and the graft materials were all removed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the possibility of early infection, ASCR using TFL allograft is a reliable procedure for the irreparable rotator cuff tear. In particular, if the number of layers of TFL allograft increases, it is judged that it could become a more effective graft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Short-term clinical effectiveness of 5% lidocaine patch after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) often causes unbearable postoperative pain, even more severe than before surgery. Opioids are the drugs of choice for temporary postoperative analgesia. However, this conventional approach also has some side effects and potential for drug abuse. The aims of this study are expected to verify the effect of 5% lidocaine patch (LP5) on the intensity of early postoperative pain, functional recovery and quality of life in patients undergoing ARCR.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial, a total of 102 postoperative patients undergoing ARCR will be randomly assigned to either the LP5 group, receiving topical lidocaine analgesia, or the placebo control group. The primary outcome measure will be the change in the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons score from pre-operation to 90 days post-operation. Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, range of motion, opioid use, safety indicators, blinding assessment and several shoulder function score questionnaires. The effect of the allocated treatment will be assessed at preoperative baseline and at 7-, 14-, 30- and 90-day postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the efficacy and safety of the 5% lidocaine patch will be evaluated in terms of short-term clinical symptoms in patients undergoing ARCR. The results of this study will help determine whether LP5 is effective in early functional recovery in ARCR and whether it relieves pain and reduces opioid consumption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) ChiCTR2200060108. Registered on 19 May 2022.

Arthroscopic Extreme Medialized Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear: Resection of Cartilage and Subchondral Bone Over the Top of the Humeral Head

Rotator cuff repair is a widely performed surgery. Its purpose is to improve shoulder function, fix tendons to bones, restore anatomical structure, and prevent the progression of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and associated muscle degeneration. However, in large and massive tears, the tension imposed during repair becomes too high. Medialized repairs have been reported for cases of rotator cuff tear, but they are difficult to perform. We report on ex-medialization that used common portals and instruments to remove the osteochondral and subchondral bone, reduce humeral head volume, and suture the tendon extremely medially. Compared to a common medialized repair, this procedure reduces tension on the rotator cuff to be sutured. The goal of this technique is to restore functional anatomy, reduce the rate of retear, prevent the progression of rotator cuff muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration, and to improve muscle strength by allowing the repair of rotator cuff tears (Goutallier grade 2 or higher) to the humeral head, which have conventionally been challenging.

Biceps-incorporating rotator cuff repair with footprint medialization in large-to-massive rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

In large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), incorporating the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) with arthroscopic partial rotator cuff and margin convergence can improve clinical outcomes and preserve the acromio-humeral interval (AHI) during mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic biceps-incorporating rotator cuff repair with partial release of the LHBT and footprint medialization through the Neviaser portal in MRCTs.

METHODS

This study enrolled 107 patients (38 males and 69 females, mean age: 64.9 ± 8.6 years) with MRCTs. A novel arthroscopic biceps-incorporating repair was performed by footprint medialization, with a partially released biceps tendon covering central defects. Clinical outcomes such as pain VAS, KSS, ASES, UCLA, SST and CS scores and ROM were evaluated at a mean follow-up time of 35 months (range 12-132 months). Serial radiographs with a mean postoperative MRI follow-up duration of 33 months were used to evaluate AHI, tendon integrity, fatty infiltration (FI) and muscle hypotrophy.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain VAS, KSS, ASES, UCLA, SST, and CS scores and ROM (except external rotation) were improved significantly. AHI also improved significantly from 8.6 to 9.3 mm. According to Sugaya's classification, type I, II, III, IV, or V healing status was found in 30 (28.0%), 29 (27.1%), 26 (24.3%), 14 (13.1%), and 8 (7.5%) patients, respectively. The retear rate was 22 (20.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel biceps-incorporating cuff repair with footprint medialization yielded satisfactory outcomes in MRCT patients at the 3-year follow-up. A partially released, repaired biceps tendon provided superior stability with preserved AHI similar to that of anterior cable reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Are there differences in arthroscopic and histological features between traumatic and degenerative rotator cuff tears in elderly patients? A prospective dual-center analysis

Background

Discriminating traumatic rotator cuff tears (RCTs) from degenerative RCTs is sometimes difficult in elderly patients because the prevalence of asymptomatic RCTs increases with age. Little intraoperative information is available on the characteristics of traumatic and degenerative RCTs in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the arthroscopic findings and histological changes of the coracoacromial ligament (CAL) between traumatic and degenerative RCTs in elderly patients.

Methods

Forty-two shoulders of 42 patients aged ≥ 65 years underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Nineteen patients had traumatic full-thickness RCTs (Group T), and 23 had degenerative full-thickness RCTs (Group D). The quality of the rotator cuff tissue and the condition of the long head of the biceps were examined. The grade of CAL was evaluated both arthroscopically and histologically. The stiffness of the musculotendinous unit was calculated by measuring the force and displacement using a tensiometer. The arthroscopic and histological findings of the two groups were compared.

Results

Although the mean tendon displacement was comparable, the stiffness was different between Group T and Group D (0.56 ± 0.31 and 1.09 ± 0.67 N/mm, respectively; p < 0.001). Both arthroscopic and histological analysis of the CAL showed that the degenerative changes in the CAL were milder in Group T than in Group D (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was a moderate positive correlation between the arthroscopic findings of CAL degeneration and the histopathological changes in this ligament (r = 0.47, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Traumatic RCTs were characterized by preserved elasticity of the musculotendinous unit and milder CAL degeneration compared with degenerative RCTs even in elderly patients.

Current concepts on management of cuff tear

Among pathologies of the shoulder, rotator cuff tear is the most common. Diagnosis of cuff tear around mid twenties is unusual, but the prevalence increases significantly after the age of forty. The prevalence after the age of 60 is around 20-30%. A well recognised feature of cuff tear is being asymptomatic but, tear progression in asymptomatic is a known consequence. The spectrum of cuff tear ranges from partial, full thickness cuff tear with or without retraction. The mainstay of treatment for partial thickness cuff tear is systematic rehabilitation and for the full thickness cuff tear an initial rehabilitation is an accepted management. Failed rehabilitation for 3 months, acute traumatic tear, younger age, intractable pain, good quality muscle would be the indications for repair of a full thickness cuff tear. Though there are defined indications for surgical intervention in the full thickness rotator cuff tear, differentiating an asymptomatic tear that would not progress or identifying a tear that would become better with rehabilitation is an undeniable challenge for even the most experienced surgeon. Rehabilitation in cuff tear consists of strengthening the core stabilizers along with rotator cuff and deltoid muscles. In a symptomatic cuff tear that merits surgical intervention the objective is to do an anatomical foot print repair. In scenarios where the cuff is retracted, one has to settle for a medialised repair. As, a repair done in tension is more likely to fail than a tensionless medialised repair. The success rate of all these non anatomical procedures varies from series to series but it approximates around 60-80%. Augmenting cuff repair to enhance biological healing is a recent advance in rotator cuff repair surgery. The augmentation factors can be growth factors like PRP, scaffolds both auto and allografts. The outcome of these procedures from literature has been variable. As there are no major harmful effects, it can be viewed as another future step in bringing better outcomes to patients having rotator cuff tear surgery. Despite being the commonest shoulder pathology, the rotator cuff tear still remains as a condition with varied presenting features and a wide variety of management options. The goal of the treatment is to achieve pain free shoulders with good function. Correcting altered scapular kinematics by systematic rehabilitation of the shoulder would be the first choice in all partial thickness cuff tear and also as an initial management of full thickness cuff tears. Failure of rehabilitation would be the step forward for a surgical intervention. While embarking on a surgical procedure, correct patient selection, sound surgical technique, appropriate counselling about expected outcome are the most essential in patient satisfaction.

Does the Interval Slide Procedure Reduce Supraspinatus Tendon Repair Tension?: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Background

The benefits of the interval slide (IS) procedure in retracted rotator cuff tears remain controversial.

Purpose

The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the IS procedure on repair tension (RT). It was hypothesized that the IS procedure (anterior IS [AIS], posterior IS [PIS], and intra-articular capsular release [CR]) would reduce the RT of a supraspinatus tendon.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 31 Thiel-embalmed human cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 74 years; range, 68-84 years) were tested. Full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears were created, and 1 cm of tendon was resected to simulate a retracted defect. Shoulders were randomized into intervention (n = 16) and control (n = 15) groups. In all shoulders, the load during tendon reduction to footprint was measured, an endpoint was defined as maximum tendon lateralization before 50 N was reached, and the RT (load during lateralization to endpoint) of the native tendon (t₁) was evaluated. In the intervention group, AIS (t₂), PIS (t₃), and CR (t₄) were performed in order, with RT measurement after each step. In the control group, RT was assessed at the same time points without the intervention.

Results

A complete reduction of the tendon was not achieved in any of the shoulders. Mean maximum lateralization was 6.7 ± 1.30 mm, with no significant differences between groups. In the intervention group, the overall IS procedure reduced RT about 47.0% (t₁ vs t₄: 38.7 ± 3.9 vs 20.5 ± 12.3 N; P < .001). AIS reduced RT significantly (t₁ vs t₂: 38.7 ± 3.9 vs 27.4 ± 10.5 N; P < .001), whereas subsequent PIS (t₂ vs t₃: 27.4 ± 10.5 vs 23.2 ± 12.4 N; P = .27) and CR (t₃ vs t₄: 23.2 ± 12.4 vs 20.5 ± 12.3 N; P = .655) did not additionally reduce tension. Comparison between groups at t₄ revealed a reduction of RT of about 47.8% (control vs intervention: 39.3 ± 4.0 vs 20.5 ± 12.3 N; P < .001).

Conclusion

The IS procedure reduces RT of the supraspinatus tendon in human cadaveric shoulders. However, performing PIS and CR subsequent to AIS does not reduce tension additionally.

Clinical Relevance

These findings provide surgeons with a biomechanical rationale regarding the efficacy of the IS procedure.

The "Greenhouse" Technique Using Knotless Single-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Bone Marrow Stimulation for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears

To simplify the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique and improve tendon healing, we have developed a method named the "Greenhouse" technique to repair rotator cuff. With bone marrow stimulation combined with knotless single-row suture bridge fixation, we provide a technique for reliable cuff fixation with enhanced biological features.

Biceps Rerouting for Semirigid Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with biceps rerouting (BR) and those of conventional repair for semirigid, large-to-massive rotator cuff tear.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data of 111 patients who underwent either ARCR + BR (n = 59, group 1) or only ARCR (n = 52, group 2) for semirigid, large-to-massive rotator cuff tear between January 2016 and December 2018. We comparatively analyzed both groups with respect to preoperative factors including concomitant lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive variables for occurrence of retear after ARCR + BR.

RESULTS

Mean age of groups 1 and 2 were 62.8 and 63.7 years, respectively (P = .484). Mean follow-up period in groups 1 and 2 were 15.1 and 25.1 months, respectively (P = .102). Mean range of motion and functional scores improved significantly (P < .05) and comparably (P > .05) in both groups. In total, 11 (18.6%) and 25 (48.1%) patients from groups 1 and 2, respectively, showed retear of the repaired rotator cuff at final follow-up (P < .01). Of 45 group 1 patients who showed less than 50% partial tearing of the LHBT preoperatively, 6 (13.3%) experienced retear. Comparatively, of 14 patients with partial tearing involving more than 50% of the LHBT, 5 (35.7%) suffered postoperative retear. If the patients had partial tear involving more than 50% of LHBT preoperatively, the odds ratio (OR) to have retear was 4.222 (P = .037). Wider (OR, 1.445, P = .047) and thinner (OR, 0.166, P = .019) LHBT were the prognostic factors to have retear. Three (5.1%) group 1 patients showed the Popeye deformity at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ARCR + BR for semirigid, large-to-massive rotator cuff tears effectively improved clinical and structural outcomes as also shown in the conventional repairs. However, the retear rate was significantly lower in patients who underwent ARCR + BR than those treated conventionally. Partial tearing involving more than 50% of the LHBT and wide and/or thin tendon morphology were significant risk factors for postoperative occurrence of retear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative trial.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Muscle Advancement and Artificial Biodegradable Sheet Reinforcement for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Because high failure rates have frequently been reported after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs), we introduced the technique of ARCR with supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle advancement (MA). However, for cases where the original footprint cannot be completely covered, additional surgery using an approved artificial biomaterial is performed.

Purpose

To investigate the postoperative clinical outcomes and failure rate after MA-ARCR, with and without our reinforcement technique.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 74 patients (mean ± SD age, 68.7 ± 7.7 years) diagnosed with mRCT with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years were included in the current study. Of these patients, 47 underwent MA-ARCR with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet reinforcement (study group), and 27 patients underwent MA-ARCR alone (control group). PGA reinforcement was performed when full coverage of the footprint could not be achieved by MA alone, but where the latter was possible, reinforcement was not required. Thus, the study group had significantly worse muscle quality than the control group (P < .05). The pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM), isometric muscle strength, acromiohumeral interval, and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between these 2 groups. Cuff integrity during the last follow-up period was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, and the failure rate was calculated. In addition, the postoperative foreign body reaction was investigated in the study group.

Results

In both groups, significant postoperative improvements were seen in acromiohumeral interval, clinical scores, ROM in anterior flexion, and isometric muscle strength in abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation (P < .001 for all). The failure rate of the study group was 12.8% (6 patients) and that of the control group was 25.9% (7 patients). No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups on any of the data findings, even regarding the failure rate. Foreign body reactions in the early period were found in 3 patients, although these spontaneously disappeared within 3 months.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent PGA patch reinforcement for MA-ARCR when the footprint could not be completely covered had clinical results similar to isolated MA-ARCR when the footprint could be covered. Both procedures resulted in significant improvement in symptoms and function compared with preoperatively.

Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Large to Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Medialization of the Attachment Site of the Rotator Cuff Tendon

Backgroud

The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair with medialization of the attachment site of the rotator cuff tendon and to identify prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing in patients with irreparable large to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

Methods

Between July 2012 and March 2016, 42 patients with irreparable large to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears underwent an arthroscopic partial repair with medialization of the attachment site of the rotator cuff tendon. All patients had a minimum of 2-year follow-up (mean, 35.4 ± 7.3 months). Clinical evaluation was performed using the visual analog scale, the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, Constant score, and active range of motion. Radiological evaluation was performed using magnetic resonance imaging and simple radiography.

Results

Clinical outcomes at the final follow-up improved significantly compared with the preoperative values (all p < 0.001). The failure rate was 23.8% (10/42); however, clinical outcomes significantly improved regardless of cuff healing (all p < 0.001). The mean acromiohumeral distance was 6.5 ± 1.7 mm (range, 3.2-9.7 mm) before surgery and 6.3 ± 1.6 mm (range, 2.8-9.5 mm) at the final follow-up. Preoperative acromiohumeral distance was associated with failure of cuff healing in the univariate analysis (p = 0.043) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.048). A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive cutoff value for the smallest preoperative acromiohumeral distance for successful healing, which was calculated as 5.3 mm.

Conclusions

Despite healing failure, arthroscopic partial repair with medialization can be a possible treatment option for irreparable large to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears because of the improvement in clinical outcome. The shorter preoperative acromiohumeral distance was the single most important factor negatively affecting cuff healing, and the likelihood of success of healing might be improved if a repair is performed when the preoperative acromiohumeral distance is < 5.3 mm.

Surgical Options for Failed Rotator Cuff Repair, except Arthroplasty: Review of Current Methods

Although the prevalence of rotator cuff tears is dependent on the size, 11% to 94% of patients experience retear or healing failure after rotator cuff repair. Treatment of patients with failed rotator cuff repair ranges widely, from conservative treatment to arthroplasty. This review article attempts to summarize the most recent and relevant surgical options for failed rotator cuff repair patients, and the outcomes of each treatment, except arthroplasty.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance arthrogram assessment of tendon healing

BACKGROUND

Many poor outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair relate to failure of tendon healing. The purposes of this study were to provide a better understanding of the magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) characteristics of the RC tendon repair site after arthroscopic RC repair and to examine how these findings influence patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the presence of persistent symptoms.

METHODS

We reviewed 48 shoulders (13 female and 35 male patients; average age, 53.8 years) at a minimum of 6 months (average, 11.4 months) after arthroscopic RC repair (average tear size, 2.2 cm). All patients completed PROMs and underwent MRA assessment. Detailed analysis of the RC repair site was undertaken, with findings correlated with clinical outcomes and PROMs.

RESULTS

The average preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score of 39.5 improved to 92.8 (P < .001). All but 6 patients (87.5%) had increased signal intensity of the involved tendon, with interstitial splits and/or delamination in 65.6%. These changes had no effect on PROMs or patient satisfaction. Significant partial-thickness tears (>50%) were observed in 7 patients (14.6%), with no effect on outcomes (average ASES score of 95.2 and satisfaction score of 9). There were 2 recurrent full-thickness tears (4.2%), and 4 patients (8.3%) had a failure in continuity. The average ASES score in these 6 cases of failure was 76 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Structural abnormalities on MRA are common after RC repair but do not always result in clinical failure. However, our results suggest that an ASES score of less than 80 may be useful when considering postoperative imaging, especially in a patient with ongoing pain more than 6 months after surgery.

How Much Will High Tension Adversely Affect Rotator Cuff Repair Integrity?

PURPOSE

To suggest a cutoff value of tension related to retear of a repaired chronically contracted rotator cuff and to analyze the correlation between predictive factors and integrity of repair in large to massive contracted rotator cuff tears (RCTs).

METHODS

We analyzed arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs for large to massive (>3 cm) contracted RCTs, not amenable to complete repair by standard means with meticulous release, with a minimum of 1 year follow-up. An intraoperative procedure was designed for the estimation of repair tension using a tensiometer. Clinical and radiological findings were compared between the healed group and the retear group, and magnetic resonance imaging was performed ∼1 year postoperatively for the evaluation of integrity of the repair site. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify the cutoff value of the independent factors. Factors affecting postoperative retear were examined with multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled in this study and divided into the healed group (31 patients) and the retear group (19 patients) according to the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging findings. Significant results showed that tension (5.13 < 95% confidence interval [CI] < 58.15, P < .001) and acromiohumeral interval (AHI) (1.13 < 95% CI < 33.10, P = .013) were important factors for the integrity of rotator cuff repair. The cutoff value of tension was 35 N, and an AHI <6.6 mm may also be considered a predictor of retear. An occupation ratio of the tension >35 N was the strongest predictor of retear, with an area under the curve of 0.799, sensitivity of 84.2%, and specificity of 67.7% (accuracy = 76.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The integrity of a large to massive rotator cuff repair is strongly related to the tension to reach the articular margin of the footprint and AHI. We found that the possibility of retear increases when tension ≥35 N is required. AHI <6.6 mm may also be considered a predictor of retear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort design.

Editorial Commentary: Does a Medialized Repair Allow Single-Row to Outperform Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair?

The optimal surgical technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair remains controversial, with advantages and disadvantages to each of the most commonly used methods. The pattern as well as number of suture anchors relative to the footprint has been one of the most common sources of debate, with proponents and arguments for both single- and double-row arrangements. Although double-row techniques have been shown to be biomechanically superior and to improve footprint coverage, evidence has been mixed as to whether they are clinically superior, especially in small- and medium-sized tears. Whereas historically, single-row repairs have aimed to restore pre-tear tendon tension, there recently has been interest in a medialized single-row technique to reduce repair tension. Advantages of this technique include a reduced number of anchors and thus a reduced cost, an efficient technique, and a potential reduction in tension, which could improve healing rates. Disadvantages of this technique include a reduced tendon-to-bone area of contact, which may lead to higher rates of incomplete healing.

Comparison of Structural Integrity and Functional Outcome Between Delaminated and Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears After En Masse Arthroscopic Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic repair of delaminated rotator cuff tears (RCTs) has shown poor prognoses. Despite the importance of delaminated tears, only a few studies have compared delaminated and nondelaminated tears.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and structural integrity after en masse arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between delaminated and nondelaminated RCTs and to evaluate whether infraspinatus tendon involvement affects the prognosis for delaminated tears after arthroscopic cuff repair, through use of propensity score matching for precise comparison.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study included 180 consecutive patients with medium- or large-sized RCTs who had an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up, of whom 57 and 123 had delaminated tears (group 1) and nondelaminated tears (group 2), respectively. The en masse repair technique using a single-row or transosseous-equivalent double-row suture-bridge technique was used for of all the delaminated cases. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, shoulder active range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and Constant scores were assessed. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at least 24 months postoperatively to identify retear of the repaired rotator cuffs. After propensity score matching, 32 cases in both groups were successfully matched, and the clinical and radiological results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching, postoperative clinical outcomes were improved, showing no significant differences between the groups, excluding forward elevation ( P = .011). Groups 1 and 2 had 17 (29.8%) and 11 retear cases (8.9%), respectively ( P < .001). After propensity score matching, only the ASES score (72.5 vs 77.1) showed a significant superiority in group 2 ( P = .038). Propensity-matched groups 1 and 2 had 8 (25.0%) and 2 (6.3%) retear cases, respectively ( P = .034). No significant difference was found in structural integrity depending on whether the RCT included the infraspinatus tendon (IST). The odds ratio for retear of the delaminated tears, including IST, was 5.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-30.0, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Delaminated RCT was a negative prognostic factor of structural integrity after repair and could affect the functional outcome. However, whether IST tear was involved had no effect on the prognosis after repair.

Shear Wave Elastography Can Predict Passive Stiffness of Supraspinatus Musculotendinous Unit During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair for Presurgical Planning

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) with B-mode ultrasound in predicting the stiffness of the rotator cuff muscle before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to evaluate the difficulty of the surgical procedure, as well as to compare SWE with the Goutallier stage on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with a full-thickness supraspinatus tear requiring arthroscopic rotator cuff repair participated. The Goutallier stage of fatty infiltration on MRI was measured before surgery, as was the SWE modulus of the anterior superficial, anterior deep, posterior superficial, and posterior deep (PD) regions of the supraspinatus muscle. To measure the stiffness of the supraspinatus musculotendinous unit during surgery, the supraspinatus tendon was axially stretched until the anatomic insertion site was reached, and force per deformation was recorded. The correlation between stiffness of the supraspinatus and SWE value in each region of the supraspinatus muscle or Goutallier stage was determined. In addition, patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) In the complete footprint coverage group, greater than 50% of the footprint was covered during the stiffness measurement, and (2) in the incomplete footprint coverage group, less than 50% of the footprint was covered during the stiffness measurement. Differences in SWE value and Goutallier stage were measured between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The best correlation of stiffness with the SWE modulus of the PD muscle of the supraspinatus was R = 0.69, and the correlation of stiffness with the Goutallier stage on MRI was R = 0.48. The SWE value of the PD region was greater in the incomplete footprint coverage group than in the complete footprint coverage group, although the Goutallier stage was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest correlation with stiffness of the supraspinatus musculotendinous unit was with the SWE modulus of the PD muscle, as compared with SWE evaluation of the other regions or the Goutallier stage on MRI. Ultrasound SWE can predict the stiffness of the supraspinatus musculotendinous unit best.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Rotator cuff retraction adds difficulty to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Ultrasound SWE may be used for presurgical planning.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes After Medializing and Not Medializing Rotator Cuff Tendon Attachment Site on Chronic Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of chronically retracted rotator cuff tears by arthroscopic medializing and non-medializing repair (restoring anatomic footprint and performing conventional repair).

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 195 patients who underwent arthroscopic double-row modified Mason-Allen repair for large, full-thickness rotator cuff tears from January 2013 to July 2015. We included a total of 60 of these patients and divided them into 2 groups: those who underwent medialization (n = 24) and those who did not (n = 36). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at a minimum of 6 months (mean, 15.2 months; range, 6-24 months) postoperatively to assess cuff integrity. Patients were clinically evaluated at least 1 year postoperatively (mean, 18.9 months; range, 12-60 months) with a visual analog scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score, and the Constant score.

RESULTS

The mean medialization length was 10.5 mm (range, 6.5-15.6 mm) on magnetic resonance imaging. The retear rate was 8.3% (n = 2) in the medialization group and 31% (n = 11) in the non-medialization group (P = .041). At last follow-up, the mean visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles, and Constant scores improved significantly from 5.3 ± 1.4, 38.5 ± 8.8, 22.5 ± 3.1, and 41.7 ± 9.9, respectively, to 1.8 ± 1.1, 85.3 ± 7.5, 31.8 ± 2.5, and 90.2 ± 6.9, respectively, with medialization and from 4.0 ± 1.6, 51.5 ± 10.5, 20.0 ± 3.9, and 55.9 ± 10.5, respectively, to 1.4 ± 1.0, 88.6 ± 9.0, 31.0 ± 9.3, and 89.4 ± 9.3, respectively, with non-medialization (P < .001), although there were no significant differences between the groups (P = .165, P = .653, P = .250, and P = .113, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Medialization of approximately 10.5 mm reliably shows good clinical results, and medializing rotator cuff tendons should be considered as a treatment option for repairing rotator cuff tears with chronic retracted tendons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Editorial Commentary: Start Medializing More! An Option to Treat Chronic Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears

The results after repair of chronic retracted rotator cuff tears are similar whether or not the repair is medialized. Medializing appears to be a valid alternative to neglect and superior capsular reconstruction in the toolbox of the shoulder surgeon.

Recurrent tears of the rotator cuff: Effect of repair technique and management options

Retears of the rotator cuff, following operative repair, is not an uncommon event. Various factors have been shown to influence recurrence including the technique of repair. Multiple techniques have been performed with varying results and complications. The repair technique significantly affects the rate and pattern of retears. Although risk of retears with double row and suture bridge techniques is relatively low, medial cuff failure is a potential complication which poses significant challenges when revision repair is undertaken. Modifications in surgical techniques in, both, double row and suture bridge repairs can help decrease the risk of medial cuff failure. Thorough analysis of retear rates and patterns reported, and their relation with the repair technique, provides new insights about the pathogenesis of rotator cuff retears, their future prevention and appropriate management.

Factors affecting rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for medium-sized or larger cuff tears: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We wished to identify the preoperative prognostic factors associated with structural integrity after repair of medium-sized and larger rotator cuff tears and to determine the cutoff values using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

METHODS

The study included 180 patients with medium-sized and larger rotator cuff tears. Each had a minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging. We assessed several patient-related and disease-related preoperative factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. To determine the cutoff value for the significant variables, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Retears occurred in 28 of the 180 patients (15.6%). Univariate analysis found that retear was significantly affected by the type of work and pattern of tear. The rate of retear was significantly increased in diabetes and with increasing tear size, extent of retraction, delamination, and fatty infiltration. Furthermore, reduced remnant tendon length, distance from the musculotendinous junction to the face of the glenoid, occupation ratio, and acromiohumeral interval were also significant risk factors. In the multivariate analysis, body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia, extent of retraction, delamination, distance from musculotendinous junction to face of glenoid, occupation ratio, fatty infiltration of infraspinatus, and acromiohumeral interval remained significant risk factors. The extent of retraction (22.2 mm) and the occupation ratio (53.5%) showed highly accurate cutoff values for predicting retear.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors influenced the healing process after rotator cuff repair. The best predictors were the extent of retraction and occupation ratio, which could help assist in determining the prognosis after rotator cuff repairs.

Factors Predictive of Healing in Large Rotator Cuff Tears: Is It Possible to Predict Retear Preoperatively?

BACKGROUND

Many studies have identified risk factors that cause retear after rotator cuff repair. However, it is still questionable whether retears can be predicted preoperatively.

PURPOSE

To determine the risk factors related to retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to evaluate whether it is possible to predict the occurrence of retear preoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study enrolled 112 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with single-row technique for a large-sized tear, defined as a tear with a mediolateral length of 3 to 5 cm. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 9 months postoperatively to assess tendon integrity. The sample included 61 patients (54.5%) in the healed group and 51 (45.5%) in the retear group.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of retears were supraspinatus muscle atrophy ( P < .001) and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus ( P = .027), which could be preoperatively measured by MRI. A significant difference was found between the two groups in sex, the acromiohumeral interval, tendon tension, and preoperative or intraoperative mediolateral tear length and musculotendinous junction position in univariate analysis. However, these variables were not independent predictors in multivariate analysis. The cutoff values of occupation ratio of supraspinatus and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus were 43% and grade 2, respectively. The occupation ratio of supraspinatus <43% and grade ≥2 fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus were the strongest predictors of retear, with an area under the curve of 0.908, sensitivity of 98.0%, and specificity of 83.6% (accuracy = 90.2%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with large rotator cuff tears, it was possible to predict the retear before rotator cuff repair regardless of intraoperative factors. The retear could be predicted most effectively when the occupation ratio of supraspinatus was <43% or the fatty infiltration of infraspinatus was grade ≥2. Predicting retear preoperatively may help surgeons determine proper treatment and predict the postoperative prognosis.

Treatment Strategy for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Recently, patients with shoulder pain have increased rapidly. Of all shoulder disorders, rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are most prevalent in the middle-aged and older adults, which is the primary reason for shoulder surgery in the population. Some authors have reported that up to 30% of total RCTs can be classified as irreparable due to the massive tear size and severe muscle atrophy. In this review article, we provide an overview of treatment methods for irreparable massive RCTs and discuss proper surgical strategies for RCTs that require operative management.

Arthroscopic Massive Rotator Cuff Repair and Techniques for Mobilization

Massive rotator cuff tears, as classified by size or tendon involvement, are challenging to repair due to scarring, retraction of the tendons, and difficult visualization. Left untreated, these injuries can lead to fatty infiltration and reduced acromiohumeral distance that precludes future repair. The high rate of failure in these patients often impedes an anatomical repair. However, advanced mobilization techniques of the supraspinatus help facilitate a reduction of an otherwise irreparable tear. By performing this repair, more costly procedures may be avoided, such as a superior capsular reconstruction and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This Technical Note presents our preferred technique of an all-arthroscopic, medialized repair with double interval slides for the treatment of a massive rotator cuff tear.