Association of CD34 Cell Dose with 5-Year Overall Survival after Peripheral Blood Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies

High CD34-positive cell dose in matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is not associated with graft-versus-host disease or mortality

BACKGROUND

CD34+ stem cells serve as the primary graft source for allogeneic transplants, with a minimum of 2-4 × 106 cells/kg needed for engraftment. There are conflicting data on outcomes at high stem cell doses, with studies limited by few patients receiving doses far above the minimum target.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study of patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent matched unrelated donor transplants, we assessed outcomes for engraftment, survival, relapse, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) for the highest CD34+ dose quintile (>13 × 106 cells/kg, n = 36) compared to the remaining patients (n = 139). Similar analysis was performed correlating T cell dose and outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups in neutrophil engraftment, with a trend toward faster platelet engraftment. There was no significant difference in mortality (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-1.22), relapse (aRR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.42), or overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = .44). High CD34+ dose was not associated with higher incidence of acute GVHD (aRR = 0.99 grades II-IV, aRR = 1.18 grades III-IV) or chronic GVHD (aRR = 0.87 overall, RR = 1.21 severe). There was limited correlation between CD34+ and T cell dose (R2 = .073), and there was no significant difference in survival, relapse, or GVHD in the highest T cell dose quintile (n = 33) compared to the remaining quintiles (n = 132).

DISCUSSION

We found no difference in survival, relapse, or GVHD incidence or severity in patients receiving CD34+ doses above prior cutoffs reported in the literature. These data do not support the routine use of graft CD34+ dose reduction.

Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Graft Characterization and Engraftment Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered the deployment of unfamiliar measures to safeguard successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Among these measures, cryopreservation offered logistical benefits that could outlast the pandemic, including graft availability and timely clinical service. The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution in patients transplanted with cryopreserved allogeneic stem cell products during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We evaluated 44 patients who underwent allo-HCT using cryopreserved grafts consisting of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) apheresis (A) and bone marrow (BM) products at Mount Sinai Hospital. Comparative analyses of 37 grafts infused fresh during the one-year period preceding the pandemic were performed. Assessment of cellular therapy products included total nucleated cell and CD34+ cell enumeration, viability, and post-thaw recovery. The primary clinical endpoint was the evaluation of engraftment (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and platelet count) and donor chimerism (presence of CD33+ and CD3+ donor cells) at day +30 and +100 post-transplant. Adverse events related to cell infusion were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between the fresh and cryopreserved groups with 2 exceptions in the HPC-A cohort: the number of patients in the cryopreserved group that received haploidentical grafts was 6 times that in the fresh group, and the number of patients in the fresh group with a Karnofsky performance score >90 was double that in the cryopreserved group. The quality of HPC-A and HPC-BM products was not affected by cryopreservation, and all grafts met the release criteria for infusion. The pandemic did not affect the time between collection and cryopreservation (median, 24 hours) and time in storage (median, 15 days). Median time to ANC recovery was significantly delayed in recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A (15 vs 11 days, P = .0121), and there was a trend toward delayed platelet engraftment (24 vs 19 days, P = .0712). The delay in ANC and platelet recovery was not observed when only matched graft recipients were compared. Cryopreservation did not affect the ability of HPC-BM grafts to engraft and reconstitute hematopoiesis, and there was no difference in the rates of ANC and platelet recovery. Achievement of donor CD3/CD33 chimerism was not affected by cryopreservation of either HPC-A or HPC-BM products. Graft failure was observed in only 1 case, a recipient of cryopreserved HPC-BM. Three recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A grafts died before ANC engraftment from infectious complications. Remarkably, 22% of our studied population had myelofibrosis, and almost half received cryopreserved HPC-A grafts with no graft failure observed. Finally, patients receiving cryopreserved grafts were at a higher risk of infusion-related adverse events than those receiving fresh grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts results in adequate product quality with minimal impact on short-term clinical outcomes, except for an increased risk of infusion-related adverse events. Cryopreservation is a safe option in terms of graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution with logistical benefits, but additional data are needed to determine long-term outcomes and assess whether this is a suitable strategy for at-risk patients.

Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells Co-cultured in 3D with Stromal Support to Optimize Lentiviral Vector-mediated Gene Transduction

HSC transplantation (HSCT) has emerged as a promising treatment option for hematological and immunological disorders. Unfortunately, many viral vectors are inefficient at transduction, limiting the number of cells available for gene therapy in cord blood HSC transplantation. Combining ex vivo expansion and genetic manipulation of cord blood cells is a potential gene therapy approach. We present a 3D co-culture method using a demineralized bone matrix scaffold to optimize lentiviral vector-mediated gene transduction. pLenti-III-miR-GFP-has-miR-124 was transduced into cord blood HSCs. Transduced CD34 + cells co-cultured on the stromal layer for 72 h under cytokine-free conditions. We performed flow cytometry, colony assays, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and SEM morphological analysis. Seventy-two hours after transduction, when pLentiIII-miR-GFP-has-miR-124 and control vector-transduced expanded cord blood HSCs were compared to non-transduced expanded cord blood HSCs, the findings revealed 15 ± 3.04 and 55 ± 3.05-fold increases in miR-124 mRNA expression, respectively. Compared to a control culture on the same day, the expansion of CD34+, CD38-HSCs in 3D culture increased 544 ± 31.09 fold. This result demonstrated that the 3D-culture system could emerge as a novel approach to overcoming the current limitations of cord blood HSC transduction. In the future, this research could be applied in a therapeutic setting.

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Donor Collections and Safety

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly influenced unrelated donor (UD) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections. Changes included efforts to minimize COVID-19 exposure to donors and cryopreservation of products. The extent to which the efficacy and safety of PBSC donations were affected by the pandemic is unknown.

METHODS

Prospective cohort analysis of PBSC collections comparing pre-pandemic (01 April 2019-14 March 2020) and pandemic (15 March 2020-31 March 2022) eras.

RESULTS

Of a total of 291 PBSC collections, cryopreservation was undertaken in 71.4% of pandemic donations compared to 1.1% pre-pandemic. The mean requested CD34⁺ cell dose/kg increased from 4.9 ± 0.2 × 10⁶ pre-pandemic to 5.4 ± 0.1 × 10⁶ during the pandemic. Despite this increased demand, the proportion of collections that met or exceeded the requested cell dose did not change, and the mean CD34⁺ cell doses collected (8.9 ± 0.5 × 10⁶ pre-pandemic vs. 9.7 ± 0.4 × 10⁶ during the pandemic) remained above requested targets. Central-line placements were more frequent, and severe adverse events in donors increased during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Cryopreservation of UD PBSC products increased during the pandemic. In association with this, requested cell doses for PBSC collections increased. Collection targets were met or exceeded at the same frequency, signaling high donor and collection center commitment. This was at the expense of increased donor or product-related severe adverse events. We highlight the need for heightened vigilance about donor safety as demands on donors have increased since the pandemic.

Effects of CD34+ cell dose on haematopoietic recovery in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients with positive pretransplant measurable residual disease

INTRODUCTION

A higher CD34⁺ cell dose in allografts is associated with faster haematopoietic recovery after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Leukaemia stem cells impair normal bone marrow (BM) niches and induce BM failure during leukemogenesis. However, whether measurable residual disease (MRD), known as the persistence of low-level leukaemic cells, could influence the effects of CD34⁺ cell dose on haematopoietic recovery after transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 975 ALL patients were enrolled and classified into pre-HSCT MRD-positive and MRD-negative subgroups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were built for time-to-event outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent influencing factors from the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

An appropriate CD34⁺ cell dose was positively associated with faster haematopoietic recovery in the total ALL population. More importantly, in pre-HSCT MRD-positive ALL patients, a higher CD34⁺ cell dose (≥2.76 × 10⁶ /kg) was related to faster neutrophil (HR 1.330, 95% CI 1.045-1.692, p = 0.021) and platelet engraftment (HR 1.808, 95% CI 1.412-2.316, p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. CD34⁺ cell dose was a crucial factor associated with either engraftment or transplant outcomes, although we did not demonstrate direct correlations of CD34⁺ cell dose with relapse, TRM, LFS or OS after allo-HSCT.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that no additional CD34⁺ stem and progenitor cell harvests were needed to ensure successful haematopoietic recovery in pre-HSCT MRD-positive patients compared to pre-HSCT MRD-negative patients.

The Hunt Is On! In Pursuit of the Ideal Stem Cell Population for Cartilage Regeneration

Cartilage injury and degeneration are hallmarks of osteoarthritis (OA), the most common joint disease. OA is a major contributor to pain, loss of function, and reduced quality of life. Over the last decade, considerable research efforts have focused on cell-based therapies, including several stem cell-derived approaches to reverse the cartilage alterations associated with OA. Although several tissue sources for deriving cell-based therapies have been identified, none of the resident stem cell populations have adequately fulfilled the promise of curing OA. Indeed, many cell products do not contain true stem cells. As well, issues with aggressive marketing efforts, combined with a lack of evidence regarding efficacy, lead the several national regulatory bodies to discontinue the use of stem cell therapy for OA until more robust evidence becomes available. A review of the evidence is timely to address the status of cell-based cartilage regeneration. The promise of stem cell therapy is not new and has been used successfully to treat non-arthritic diseases, such as hematopoietic and muscle disorders. These fields of regenerative therapy have the advantage of a considerable foundation of knowledge in the area of stem cell repair mechanisms, the role of the stem cell niche, and niche-supporting cells. This foundation is lacking in the field of cartilage repair. So, where should we look for the ideal stem cell to regenerate cartilage? It has recently been discovered that cartilage itself may contain a population of SC-like progenitors. Other potential tissues include stem cell-rich dental pulp and the adolescent growth plate, the latter of which contains chondrocyte progenitors essential for producing the cartilage scaffold needed for bone growth. In this article, we review the progress on stem cell therapies for arthritic disorders, focusing on the various stem cell populations previously used for cartilage regeneration, successful cases of stem cell therapies in muscle and hemopoietic disorders, some of the reasons why these other fields have been successful (i.e., “lessons learned” to be applied to OA stem cell therapy), and finally, novel potential sources of stem cells for regenerating damaged cartilage in vivo.

Association between the pharmacokinetics of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and acute graft-versus-host disease in patients who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is an important prophylactic drug against acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). This study analyzed the pharmacokinetics of rabbit ATG 2.5 mg/kg and its effect against aGVHD in 24 patients undergoing unmanipulated haplo-HSCT. All patients had hematological malignancies not in remission. The median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) before rabbit ATG administration was 9.5/µL (range 0-41/µL). The grade ≥ II aGVHD group had a significantly lower median rabbit ATG concentration on days 0 (C₀) and 7 (C₇) and areas under the curve on days 0-7 (AUC_0-7) and 0-32 (AUC_0-32) than the grade 0-I aGVHD group. Among the four parameters, C₀ was the most optimal for predicting aGVHD according to the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the ROC curve 0.893; 95% confidence interval 0.738-1.000). The high C₀ (≥ 27.8 µg/mL) group had significantly lower cumulative incidence of grade ≥ II aGVHD on day 100 than the low C₀ (< 27.8 µg/mL) group (13.8% vs. 88.9%, p < 0.001). In haplo-HSCT, the C₀ of rabbit ATG is a good predictor of grade ≥ II aGVHD, even though ALC before rabbit ATG administration is not a predictor of aGVHD.