Plastic microbiome development in a freshwater ecosystem

Freshwater plastisphere: a review on biodiversity, risks, and biodegradation potential with implications for the aquatic ecosystem health

The plastisphere, a unique microbial biofilm community colonizing plastic debris and microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments, has attracted increasing attention owing to its ecological and public health implications. This review consolidates current state of knowledge on freshwater plastisphere, focussing on its biodiversity, community assembly, and interactions with environmental factors. Current biomolecular approaches revealed a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic taxa associated with plastic surfaces. Despite their ecological importance, the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria and mobile genetic elements (i.e., antibiotic resistance genes) raises concerns for ecosystem and human health. However, the extent of these risks and their implications remain unclear. Advanced sequencing technologies are promising for elucidating the functions of plastisphere, particularly in plastic biodegradation processes. Overall, this review emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies to understand plastisphere dynamics in freshwater and to support effective management strategies to mitigate the impact of plastic pollution on freshwater resources.

Biofilms on plastic litter in an urban river: Community composition and activity vary by substrate type

In aquatic ecosystems, plastic litter is a substrate for biofilms. Biofilms on plastic and natural surfaces share similar composition and activity, with some differences due to factors such as porosity. In freshwaters, most studies have examined biofilms on benthic substrates, while little research has compared the activity and composition of biofilms on buoyant plastic and natural surfaces. Additionally, the influence of substrate size and successional stage on biofilm composition has not been commonly assessed. We incubated three plastics of distinct textures that are buoyant in rivers, low-density polyethylene (rigid; 1.7 mm thick), low-density polyethylene film (flexible; 0.0254 mm thick), and foamed polystyrene (brittle; 6.5 mm thick), as well as wood substrates (untreated oak veneer; 0.6 mm thick) in the Chicago River. Each material was incubated at three sizes (1, 7.5, and 15 cm2 ). Substrates were incubated at 2-10 cm depths and removed weekly for 6 weeks. On each substrate we measured chlorophyll concentration, biofilm biomass, respiration, and flux of nitrogen gas. We sequenced 16S and 23S rRNA genes at Weeks 1, 3, and 6 to capture biofilm community composition across successional stages. Chlorophyll, biomass, and N2 flux were similar across substrates, but respiration was greater on wood than plastics. Bacterial and algal richness and diversity were highest on foam and wood compared to polyethylene substrates. Bacterial biofilm community composition was distinct between wood and plastic substrates, while the algal community was distinct on wood and foam, which were different from each other and polyethylene substrates. These results indicate that polymer properties influence biofilm alpha and beta diversity, which may affect transport and distribution of plastic pollution and associated microbes, as well as biogeochemical processes in urban rivers. This study provides valuable insights into the effects of substrate on biofilm characteristics, and the ecological impacts of plastic pollution on urban rivers. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Plastic physical and chemical properties act as forces of selection for biofilm. Biofilm activity was similar among three different types of plastic. Community composition between plastic and wood was different.

Macroplastic litter colonization by stream macroinvertebrates relative to that of plant litter: A meta-analysis

Environmental pollution by anthropogenic litter is a global concern, but studies specifically addressing the interaction between macroplastics and macroinvertebrates in streams are scarce. However, several studies on plant litter decomposition in streams have also used plastic strips as a methodological approach to assess if macroinvertebrates colonize plant litter mostly as a substrate or a food resource. Looking at these studies from the plastic strips perspective may provide useful information on the interaction between macroplastics and macroinvertebrates in streams. I carried out a meta-analysis of 18 studies that have compared macroinvertebrate colonization of macroplastic litter and plant litter in streams to estimate the overall macroinvertebrate colonization of macroplastic litter relative to plant litter, and identify moderators of this difference. Macroinvertebrate colonization of macroplastic litter was overall lower (by ∼ 40%) compared with plant litter. However, differences in macroinvertebrate colonization between macroplastic litter and plant litter were observed when considering leaf litter but not wood litter, which may be a poorer substrate and food resource for macroinvertebrates. Also, differences in macroinvertebrate colonization between macroplastic litter and leaf litter were observed for shredders, collectors and predators, but not for grazers that may feed on the biofilm developed on macroplastics. Macroplastic litter supported lower macroinvertebrate density, biomass, abundance, and richness, but higher macroinvertebrate diversity than leaf litter. Higher macroinvertebrate diversity on macroplastic litter may have occurred when macroplastics represented more heterogeneous substrates (e.g., mixture of plastic types) than leaf litter (e.g., needles). Differences in macroinvertebrate abundance between macroplastic litter and leaf litter were not significantly affected by plastic type, mesh opening size, plant functional group or plant identity. By testing previously untested hypotheses, this meta-analysis guides future empirical studies. Future studies should also consider the geographical areas most affected by macroplastic pollution and the plastic types most often found in the streams.