Recommendations for the use of eliglustat in the treatment of adults with Gaucher disease type 1 in the United States

Glycoconjugates: Advances in modern medicines and human health

Glycans and their glycoconjugates are complex biomolecules that are crucial for various biological processes. Glycoconjugates are found in all domains of life. They are covalently linked to key biomolecules such as proteins and lipids to play a pivotal role in cell signaling, adhesion, and recognition. The diversity of glycan structures and the associated complexity of glycoconjugates is the reason for their role in intricate biosynthetic pathways. Glycoconjugates play an important role in various diseases where they are actively involved in the immune response as well as in the pathogenicity of infectious diseases. In addition, various autoimmune diseases have been linked to glycosylation defects of different biomolecules, making them an important molecule in the field of medicine. The glycoconjugates have been explored for the development of therapeutics and vaccines, representing a breakthrough in medical science. They also hold significance in research studies to understand the mechanisms behind various biological processes. Finally, glycoconjugates have found an emerging role in various industrial and environmental applications which have been discussed here.

Prediction of combination effect of quinidine on the pharmacokinetics of tipepidine using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model

Tipepidine, an antitussive drug, has been reported to have central pharmacological effects and can be expected to be safely repositioned as treatment for psychiatric disorders. Since tipepidine requires three doses per day, development of a once-daily medication would be highly beneficial. Previously, we reported that combination use with quinidine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, prolongs the half-life of tipepidine in chimeric mice with humanised liver.In this study, to predict this combination effect in humans, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed, and quantitative simulation was conducted. The simulation results indicated that concomitant administration of tipepidine with quinidine increased the predicted Cmax, AUC, and t1/2 of tipepidine in the Japanese population by 3.4-, 6.6-, and 2.4-fold, respectively.Furthermore, to compare with another approach that aims to prolong the half-life, the PK profile of tipepidine administered in hypothetical extended-release form was simulated. Extended-release form was predicted to be more influenced by CYP2D6 genotype than combination with quinidine, and the predicted plasma exposure was markedly increased in poor metabolizers, potentially leading to adverse effects.In conclusion, quantitative simulation using the PBPK model suggests the feasibility of the safe repositioning of tipepidine as a once-daily medication in combination with quinidine.

Lysosomal Dysfunction: Connecting the Dots in the Landscape of Human Diseases

Lysosomes are the main organelles responsible for the degradation of macromolecules in eukaryotic cells. Beyond their fundamental role in degradation, lysosomes are involved in different physiological processes such as autophagy, nutrient sensing, and intracellular signaling. In some circumstances, lysosomal abnormalities underlie several human pathologies with different etiologies known as known as lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs). These disorders can result from deficiencies in primary lysosomal enzymes, dysfunction of lysosomal enzyme activators, alterations in modifiers that impact lysosomal function, or changes in membrane-associated proteins, among other factors. The clinical phenotype observed in affected patients hinges on the type and location of the accumulating substrate, influenced by genetic mutations and residual enzyme activity. In this context, the scientific community is dedicated to exploring potential therapeutic approaches, striving not only to extend lifespan but also to enhance the overall quality of life for individuals afflicted with LSDs. This review provides insights into lysosomal dysfunction from a molecular perspective, particularly in the context of human diseases, and highlights recent advancements and breakthroughs in this field.

Effectiveness and Safety of Eliglustat Treatment in Gaucher Disease: Real-life Unicentric Experience

PURPOSE

The therapy and management of Gaucher disease (GD) have radically changed with the use of substrate reduction therapy, of which eliglustat is the most widely known drug, allowing it to overcome the limits of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The rarity of GD and the limited use of eliglustat outside clinical trials require further study of its strengths and weaknesses.

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of eliglustat in a cohort of 12 patients with GD followed up in our center, reporting a reduction in both chitotriosidase (394.3 vs 181.1 nmol/h/mL, P = 0.027) and glucosylsphingosine values (45.1 vs 18.9 ng/mL, P <0.001) after at least 12 months of therapy compared with baseline, regardless of patient demographic characteristics and GD characteristics.

FINDINGS

There were no drug-related serious adverse effects and no drug-related cardiac events. Most adverse events were mild and transient, mainly dyspepsia and abdominal pain. Of interest, we reported an absence of statistical difference in terms of response regarding glucosylsphingosine reduction in relation to naive or prior exposure to ERT (P = 0.296), which was confirmed also when patients were placed in naive and treated groups for <5 vs >5 years (P = 0.667).

IMPLICATIONS

The use of eliglustat immediately after diagnosis may guarantee the best treatment for patients with milder phenotypes or with aggressive disease after an initial stabilization with ERT compared with ERT, which cannot adequately remove the disease burden despite the apparent response, thus potentially reducing future complications caused by substrate deposits.

Management goals of type 1 Gaucher disease in South Africa: An expert Delphi consensus document on good clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Gaucher disease is a rare autosomal recessive glycosphingolipid storage disease that ultimately leads to reduced life expectancy. Management of Gaucher disease is challenging due to its wide genotypic and phenotypic variability and changing clinical manifestations due to effective treatment. Deliberation between experts is essential to discuss daily clinical practice and identify controversies regarding the management of Gaucher disease. The usefulness of methods like Delphi surveys is suitable for setting up consensus recommendations for different clinical scenarios.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to develop an expert consensus document for the management of type 1 Gaucher disease by local experts.

METHODS

A modified e-Delphi was carried out to develop an expert consensus document on the management goals of type 1 Gaucher disease in South Africa. Following a literature review and input from the steering committee, 205 management goals and best practice statements were e-mailed to an independent panel for consensus development using three rounds of voting. The panel consisted of five local healthcare practitioners with expertise in Gaucher disease. Each panelist provided independent evaluations of statements sent to them via a dedicated survey platform. Panelists indicated their level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = absolute disagreement to 9 = absolute agreement) during each round of voting. The criteria to retain a statement in the final round were ≥80% high agreement (7-9).

RESULTS

193 statements met the consensus threshold after three rounds of voting and were included in the final guidance document. In general, the management goals presented in this paper are in line with existing literature on the subject. Additional management goals and general recommendations on sound clinical practice, obtained from more recent research and the panelists' own clinical experience, have been included to develop a comprehensive consensus document on the management goals of type 1 Gaucher disease.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides high-level guidance with respect to management goals, and the use of current therapies and adjunctive interventions in type 1 Gaucher disease to assist clinicians in their decisions about the appropriate management of patients in everyday clinical practice. These management goals and best practice statements might be used to inform an update to future South African guidelines on the disease.

Recommendations on the follow-up of patients with Gaucher disease in Spain: Results from a Delphi survey

Management of Gaucher disease (GD) is challenging due to its wide genotypic and phenotypic variability and changing clinical manifestations due to effective treatment. Sixteen face-to-face meetings with experts were held in order to discuss daily clinical practice and identify controversies regarding the management of GD. With this information, a questionnaire with 93 recommendations for different clinical scenarios was designed, and a Delphi survey among 86 physicians with experience in GD was conducted. Consensus was reached on 73 out of the 93 items. Recommendations on follow-up of adult and pediatric patients were in line with current guidelines, and underscored the importance of a patient-tailored approach. For the follow-up of stable patients receiving long-term treatment, consensus was reached on the importance of multidisciplinary care that involves pediatricians, internal medicine, and primary care, specialized radiologists, orthopedic surgeons, and hematologists when required. Degree of pain, use of painkillers and antidepressants, and quality of life should be evaluated at every follow-up visit or at least once per year. In general, a closer follow-up was recommended for untreated patients or patients who underwent a treatment change (every 3 months during the first year) and during pregnancy. For pregnant patients, hemostasis and risk of hemorrhage should be assessed, but no consensus was reached for initiation of treatment in asymptomatic pregnant patients. Lastly, recommendations on how to adapt GD management during a COVID-19 pandemic were collected. This expert consensus may help decision-making during the management of GD in specific clinical scenarios.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Development, Validation, and Application for Prediction of Eliglustat Drug-Drug Interactions

Eliglustat is a glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor indicated as a long-term substrate reduction therapy for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease, a lysosomal rare disease. It is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), and variants in the gene encoding this enzyme are important determinants of eliglustat pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The existing drug label addresses the DDIs to some extent but has omitted scenarios where both metabolizing CYPs (2D6 and 3A4) are mildly or moderately inhibited. The objectives of this study were (i) to develop and validate an eliglustat physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model with and without drug interactions, (ii) to simulate untested DDI scenarios, and (iii) to explore potential dosing flexibility using lower dose strength of eliglustat (commercially not available). PK data from healthy adults receiving eliglustat with or without interacting drugs were obtained from literature and used for the PBPK model development and validation. The model-predicted single-dose and steady-state maximum concentration (C_max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of eliglustat were within 50-150% of the observed values when eliglustat was administered alone or coadministered with ketoconazole or paroxetine. Then as model-based simulations, we illustrated eliglustat exposure as a victim of interaction when coadministered with fluvoxamine following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dosing recommendations. Second, we showed that with lower eliglustat doses (21 mg, 42 mg once daily) the exposure in participants of intermediate and poor metabolizer phenotypes was within the outlined safety margin (C_max <250 ng/mL) when eliglustat was administered with ketoconazole, where the current recommendation is a contraindication of coadministration (84 mg). The present study demonstrated that patients with CYP2D6 deficiency may benefit from lower doses of eliglustat.

Biological Variation in Peripheral Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Individuals with Gaucher Disease

The lack of reliable biomarkers is a significant challenge impeding progress in orphan drug development. For appropriate interpretation of intervention-based results or for evaluating candidate biomarkers, other things being equal, lower variability in biomarker measurement would be helpful. However, variability in rare disease biomarkers is often poorly understood. Type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) is one such rare lysosomal storage disorder. Oxidative stress and inflammation have been linked to the pathophysiology of GD1 and validated measures of these processes can provide predictive value for treatment success or disease progression. This study was undertaken to investigate and compare the extent of longitudinal biological variation over a three-month period for various blood-based oxidative stress and inflammation markers in participants with GD1 on stable standard-of-care therapy (N = 13), treatment-naïve participants with GD1 (N = 5), and in age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers (N = 18). We utilized Bland–Altman plots for visual comparison of the biological variability among the three measurements. We also report group-wise means and the percentage of coefficient of variation (%CV) for 15 biomarkers. Qualitatively, we show specific markers (IL-1Ra, IL-8, and MIP-1b) to be consistently altered in GD1, irrespective of therapy status, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapies that can target and modulate these biomarkers. This information can help guide the selection of candidate biomarkers for future intervention-based studies in GD1 patients.

Recommendations for oral treatment for adult patients with type 1 Gaucher disease

This work is a review of the scientific evidence on the oral treatment of adult patients with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) with a clinical guideline format according to the Agree II regulations. It describes the main differences between the two oral treatments currently available for treating this disease (miglustat and eliglustat). This review reminds us that the criteria for starting oral treatment in patients with GD1 must be assessed individually. Although miglustat and eliglustat are both glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) enzyme inhibitors, they have different mechanisms of action and pharmacological properties and should never be considered equivalent. Miglustat is indicated in patients with non-severe GD1 who cannot receive other first-line treatments, while eliglustat is indicated as first-line treatment for patients with GD1 of any severity without the need for prior stabilization with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). It is important to emphasize that in order to start treatment with eliglustat, we must know the CYP2D6 metabolic phenotype and its association with drugs metabolized through the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 cytochromes-or alternatively those that use P-Glycoprotein must be evaluated on an individual basis. During pregnancy, the use of eliglustat should be avoided; only ERT can be used. Unlike miglustat, whose adverse effects have limited its use, eliglustat has not only demonstrated similar efficacy to ERT but has also been shown to improve the quality of life of patients with GD1.

Neuroinflammation in aucher disease, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, and commonalities with Parkinson’s disease

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are rare genetic disorders caused by a disruption in cellular clearance, resulting in pathological storage of undegraded lysosomal substrates. Recent clinical and genetic studies have uncovered links between multiple LSDs and common neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we review recent literature describing the role of glia cells and neuroinflammation in PD and LSDs, including Gaucher disease (GD) and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL), and highlight converging inflammation pathways that lead to neuron loss. Recent data indicates that lysosomal dysfunction and accumulation of storage materials can initiate the activation of glial cells, through interaction with cell surface or cytosolic pattern recognition receptors that detect pathogenic aggregates of cellular debris. Activated glia cells could act to protect neurons through the elimination of toxic protein or lipid aggregates early in the disease process. However prolonged glial activation that occurs over several decades in chronic-age related neurodegeneration could induce the inappropriate elimination of synapses, leading to neuron loss. These studies provide mechanistic insight into the relationship between lysosomal dysfunction and glial activation, and offer novel therapeutic pathways for the treatment of PD and LSDs focused on reducing neuroinflammation and mitigating cell loss.

The Shiga Toxin Receptor Globotriaosylceramide as Therapeutic Target in Shiga Toxin E. coli Mediated HUS

In 90% of the cases, childhood hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is caused by an infection with the Shiga toxin (Stx) producing E. coli bacteria (STEC-HUS). Stx preferentially binds to its receptor, the glycosphingolipid, globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), present on the surface of human kidney cells and various organs. In this study, the glycosphingolipid pathway in endothelial cells was explored as therapeutic target for STEC-HUS. Primary human glomerular microvascular endothelial cells (HGMVECs) and human blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs) in quiescent and activated state were pre-incubated with Eliglustat (Cerdelga^®; glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor) or Agalsidase alpha (Replagal^®; human cell derived alpha-galactosidase) in combination with various concentrations of Stx2a. Preincubation of endothelial cells with Agalsidase resulted in an increase of α-galactosidase activity in the cell, but had no effect on the binding of Stx to the cell surface when compared to control cells. However, the incubation of both types of endothelial cells incubated with or without the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα in combination with Eliglustat resulted in significant decrease of Stx binding to the cell surface, a decrease in protein synthesis by Stx2a, and diminished cellular Gb3 levels as compared to control cells. In conclusion, inhibition of the synthesis of Gb3 may be a potential future therapeutic target to protect against (further) endothelial damage caused by Stx.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for Gaucher disease in pediatric populations

INTRODUCTION

The past decades have witnessed a remarkable improvement in the health of patients with Gaucher disease, the inherited deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase, resulting from the availability of enzyme replacement and substrate reduction therapies. Especially in pediatric populations, early diagnosis and initiation of treatment is essential to achieving optimal outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the literature pertaining to the effectiveness of currently available therapies and describe new pharmacotherapies under development, especially for young patients.

EXPERT OPINION

For pediatric patients with non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease, there may be new therapeutic options on the horizon in the form of gene therapy or small molecule glucocerebrosidase chaperones. These have the potential to result in a cure for systemic disease manifestations and/or to reduce the cost and convenience of treatment. For children with neuronopathic Gaucher disease, the challenge of targeting therapy to the central nervous system is being explored through new modalities including brain-targeted gene therapy, in-utero therapy, brain-penetrant small molecule chaperones, and other methods that convey enzyme across the blood-brain barrier. Indeed, these are exciting times for both pediatric patients with Gaucher disease and those with other lysosomal storage disorders.

The role of glucosylsphingosine as an early indicator of disease progression in early symptomatic type 1 Gaucher disease

Gaucher disease (GD), a lysosomal storage disorder caused by β-glucocerebrosidase deficiency, results in the accumulation of glucosylceramide and glucosylsphingosine. Glucosylsphingosine has emerged as a sensitive and specific biomarker for GD and treatment response. However, limited information exists on its role in guiding treatment decisions in pre-symptomatic patients identified at birth or due to a positive family history. We present two pediatric patients with GD1 and highlight the utility of glucosylsphingosine monitoring in guiding treatment initiation.

Gene Therapy for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Ongoing Studies and Clinical Development

Rare monogenic disorders such as lysosomal diseases have been at the forefront in the development of novel treatments where therapeutic options are either limited or unavailable. The increasing number of successful pre-clinical and clinical studies in the last decade demonstrates that gene therapy represents a feasible option to address the unmet medical need of these patients. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of the field, reviewing the most used viral gene delivery vectors in the context of lysosomal storage disorders, a selection of relevant pre-clinical studies and ongoing clinical trials within recent years.

Hematological manifestations and complications of Gaucher disease

Introduction: Gaucher disease (GD), although pan-ethnic and rare (common in Ashkenazi Jews), is of great importance to hematologists both for diagnosis and management. The need for increased awareness of GD is that delayed diagnosis may lead to preventable irreversible complications (mainly skeletal) or unnecessary invasive procedures (e.g. bone marrow biopsy), and the birth of another affected sibling due to lack of genetic consulting.Areas covered: The review outlines the common hematological manifestations of GD, including splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Other hematological manifestations such as coagulation abnormalities, platelet dysfunction, gammopathy, and other hematological malignancies associated with GD are also discussed. Current and future treatment modalities are delineated, including enzyme replacement and substrate reduction therapy, pharmacological chaperon, and gene therapy. A literature search was conducted to identify original research articles relevant to hematology manifestations and GD published before November 2020.Expert opinion: Patients with GD should be ideally followed and treated in a center of excellence where the GD expert benefits from experienced consultants in relevant disciplines. Due to the availability of several very expensive treatment options, it is important to have an unbiased expert who can select the most suitable management for the individual patients (including withholding prescription in asymptomatic patients).

Mechanistic convergence and shared therapeutic targets in Niemann-Pick disease

Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) and Tangier disease are genetically and clinically distinct rare inborn errors of metabolism. NPC is caused by defects in either NPC1 or NPC2; whereas Tangier disease is caused by a defect in ABCA1. Tangier disease is currently without therapy, whereas NPC can be treated with miglustat, a small molecule inhibitor of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis that slows the neurological course of the disease. When a Tangier disease patient was misdiagnosed with NPC and treated with miglustat, her symptoms improved. This prompted us to consider whether there is mechanistic convergence between these two apparently unrelated rare inherited metabolic diseases. In this study, we found that when ABCA1 is defective (Tangier disease) there is secondary inhibition of the NPC disease pathway, linking these two diseases at the level of cellular pathophysiology. In addition, this study further supports the hypothesis that miglustat, as well as other substrate reduction therapies, may be potential therapeutic agents for treating Tangier disease as fibroblasts from multiple Tangier patients were corrected by miglustat treatment.

Effect of eliglustat on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, metoprolol, and oral contraceptives and absorption of eliglustat when coadministered with acid-reducing agents

Eliglustat is an oral substrate reduction therapy indicated for patients with Gaucher disease type 1. Based on in vitro data, clinical trials were conducted to assess the potential for drug-drug interactions between eliglustat and digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate), metoprolol (sensitive CYP2D6 substrate), a combined oral contraceptive (CYP3A substrate), and acid-reducing agents. Healthy subjects were enrolled in four Phase 1 clinical studies to evaluate the effect of eliglustat on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of digoxin (N = 28), metoprolol (N = 14), and a combined oral contraceptive (N = 30) and the effect of acid-reducing agents on eliglustat pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability (N = 24). Coadministration resulted in increased exposure to digoxin (1.49-fold) and metoprolol (2-fold) with eliglustat, negligible effects on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics with eliglustat, and a negligible effect of acid-reducing agents on eliglustat pharmacokinetics. Across all studies, eliglustat was well-tolerated. One serious adverse event (spontaneous abortion) and one discontinuation due to an adverse event (urinary tract infection) were reported, both during the acid-reducing agents study. When eliglustat is coadministered with medications that are P-glycoprotein or CYP2D6 substrates, lower doses of these concomitant medications may be required. Eliglustat may be coadministered with oral contraceptives and acid-reducing agents without dose modifications for either drug.

Open-label, expanded access study of taliglucerase alfa in patients with Gaucher disease requiring enzyme replacement therapy

A multicenter, open-label, expanded-access study followed the safety of taliglucerase alfa, a plant cell-expressed recombinant enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), in adults with Gaucher disease previously treated with imiglucerase. Patients received taliglucerase alfa every 2 weeks for 9 months at a dose equivalent to their previous imiglucerase dose (Part A); patients were offered treatment for up to 33 months (Part B), and a later amendment allowed treatment-naïve patients. Fifty-eight patients received taliglucerase alfa (55.2% male; mean age, 46.1 years; mean bi-weekly dose, 35.2 U/kg; mean duration, 17.8 months); 51 patients previously received ERT, seven were treatment-naïve, and 36 completed the study. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; treatment-related adverse events were mild and transient. In previously treated patients, increases from baseline to last follow-up were observed for mean ± SE hemoglobin concentration (13.0 ± 0.3 g/dL to 13.4 ± 0.2 g/dL) and platelet count (179,242 ± 15,344/mm³ to 215,242 ± 17,867/mm³). Findings were similar in treatment-naïve patients (mean ± SE hemoglobin concentration and platelet count, 12.8 ± 0.3 g/dL to 13.5 ± 0.2 g/dL and 168,821 ± 14,368/mm³ to 204,641 ± 16,071/mm³, respectively). Taliglucerase alfa was well-tolerated for up to 33 months and demonstrated a durable therapeutic effect.

Effects of paroxetine, ketoconazole, and rifampin on the metabolism of eliglustat, an oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease type 1

Eliglustat is an oral glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor indicated for the long-term treatment of adults with Gaucher disease type 1 and CYP2D6 extensive, intermediate, or poor metabolizer phenotypes. Eliglustat is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4 and is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Three studies evaluated the effects of paroxetine (strong CYP2D6 inhibitor), ketoconazole (strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitor), and rifampin (strong CYP3A4/P-gp inducer; OATP inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered eliglustat in healthy adults. An 8.9-fold increase in eliglustat exposure following co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and paroxetine is attributed to inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of eliglustat by paroxetine. A 4.3-fold increase in eliglustat exposure following co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and ketoconazole is attributed to inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism and/or P-gp-mediated transport of eliglustat by ketoconazole. Co-administration of eliglustat with oral doses of rifampin reduced eliglustat exposure by >85% due to induction of CYP3A4/P-gp by rifampin, while a single intravenous dose of rifampin had no effect on eliglustat, confirming that eliglustat is not an OATP substrate. Depending on CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype, co-administration of eliglustat with CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A inhibitors or CYP3A inducers may alter eliglustat exposure, warrant dosage adjustment or use with caution, or be contraindicated.

•

Co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and paroxetine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) increased eliglustat exposure.

•

Co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and ketoconazole (inhibitor of CYP3A and P-gp) increased eliglustat exposure.

•

Co-administration of eliglustat with oral rifampin (inducer of CYP3A and intestinal P-gp) reduced eliglustat exposure.

•

A single intravenous dose of rifampin had no effect on eliglustat exposure.

•

Eliglustat label contains dose adjustments/contraindications for co-administration with CYP2D6/3A inhibitors or inducers.

Drug-Drug Interactions Of Amiodarone And Quinidine On The Pharmacokinetics Of Eliglustat In Rats

Background

Eliglustat, a new oral substrate-reduction therapy, was recently approved as a first-line therapy for Gaucher's disease type 1 (GD1) patients.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate a simple UPLC-MS/MS method for the measurement of plasma-eliglustat concentration and to investigate the effects of amiodarone and quinidine on eliglustat metabolism in rats.

Methods

Eighteen rats were randomly divided into three groups (n=6): control (0.5% CMC-Na, group A), amiodarone (60 mg/kg, group B), and quinidine (100 mg/kg, group C). Thirty minutes later, 10 mg/kg eliglustat was orally administered to each rat and concentrations of eliglustat in the rats determined by our UPLC-MS/MS method.

Results

Amiodarone and quinidine increased the main pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0→_t, AUC_0→∞, and C_max) of eliglustat significantly and decreased clearance obviously.

Conclusion

Amiodarone and quinidine can elevate eliglustat exposure and have an inhibitory effect on eliglustat metabolism. Clearly, appropriate pharmacological studies of eliglustat in patients treated with amiodarone or quinidine should be done in future.

Long-term adverse event profile from four completed trials of oral eliglustat in adults with Gaucher disease type 1

Background

Eliglustat is a first-line oral treatment for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 who have an extensive, intermediate or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (> 90% of patients). Whereas enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease has been widely used for more than two decades, eliglustat has only been in commercial use since 2014. Clinicians and patients want to better understand which adverse events are most commonly associated with eliglustat, as well as their severity, frequency, and duration.

Methods

This pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events combines data from four completed eliglustat clinical trials involving 393 Gaucher disease type 1 patients. It represents 1400 patient-years of eliglustat exposure and a mean treatment duration of 3.6 years (maximum: 9.3 years).

Results

Eighty-one percent of patients remained in their respective trial until commercial availability of eliglustat (US patients only) or until trial completion. Nine patients (2.3%) withdrew from their respective trial due to one or more adverse events reported as eliglustat treatment-related; all but one of these events were mild or moderate. Overall, 97% of adverse events were mild or moderate and 86% were reported by the investigator as unrelated to eliglustat treatment. The overall rate of adverse events decreased over time and did not increase with increasing eliglustat dose. We evaluated frequency, duration, and severity of 14 adverse event terms reported at least once as treatment-related in 2% or more of all patients: dyspepsia (5.9%), headache (5.3%), abdominal pain upper (5.1%), dizziness (5.1%), diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (4.6%), arthralgia (3.6%), constipation (3.3%), abdominal pain (2.8%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (2.8%), fatigue (2.8%), palpitations (2.8%), abdominal distension (2.5%), and gastritis (2.3%). For abdominal pain upper, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache events, median duration was less than 14 days. All 14 adverse event terms, except for arthralgia and headache, were reported only once per patient in more than 70% of patients experiencing the event.

Conclusions

This final pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events reinforces the favorable safety profile of eliglustat. The majority of the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and occurred only once per patient.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1085-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Lysosomal diseases: Overview on current diagnosis and treatment

Lysosomal diseases (LDs), also known as lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), are a heterogeneous group of conditions caused by defects in lysosomal function. LDs may result from deficiency of lysosomal hydrolases, membrane-associated transporters or other non-enzymatic proteins. Interest in the LD field is growing each year, as more conditions are, or will soon be treatable. In this article, we review the diagnosis of LDs, from clinical suspicion and screening tests to the identification of enzyme or protein deficiencies and molecular genetic diagnosis. We also cover the treatment approaches that are currently available or in development, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, enzyme replacement therapy, small molecules, and gene therapy.

Substrate reduction therapy for inborn errors of metabolism

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) represent a growing group of monogenic disorders each associated with inherited defects in a metabolic enzyme or regulatory protein, leading to biochemical abnormalities arising from a metabolic block. Despite the well-established genetic linkage, pathophysiology and clinical manifestations for many IEMs, there remains a lack of transformative therapy. The available treatment and management options for a few IEMs are often ineffective or expensive, incurring a significant burden to individual, family, and society. The lack of IEM therapies, in large part, relates to the conceptual challenge that IEMs are loss-of-function defects arising from the defective enzyme, rendering pharmacologic rescue difficult. An emerging approach that holds promise and is the subject of a flurry of pre-/clinical applications, is substrate reduction therapy (SRT). SRT addresses a common IEM phenotype associated with toxic accumulation of substrate from the defective enzyme, by inhibiting the formation of the substrate instead of directly repairing the defective enzyme. This minireview will summarize recent highlights towards the development of emerging SRT, with focussed attention towards repurposing of currently approved drugs, approaches to validate novel targets and screen for hit molecules, as well as emerging advances in gene silencing as a therapeutic modality.

Ophthalmic manifestations of Gaucher disease: the most common lysosomal storage disorder

Gaucher disease (GD) results from a deficiency of glucocerebrosidase activity and the subsequent accumulation of the enzyme's metabolites, principally glucosylsphingosine and glucosylceramide. There are three principal forms: Type I, which is the most common, is usually considered non-neuronopathic. Type II, III and IIIc manifest earlier and have neurological sequelae due to markedly reduced enzyme activity. Gaucher's can be associated with ophthalmological sequelae but these have not been systematically reviewed. We therefore performed a comprehensive literature review of all such ophthalmic abnormalities associated with the different types of Gaucher disease. We systematically searched the literature (1950 - present) for functional and structural ocular abnormalities arising in patients with Gaucher disease and found that all subtypes can be associated with ophthalmic abnormalities; these range from recently described intraocular lesions to disease involving the adnexae, peripheral nerves and brain. In summary, Gaucher can affect most parts of the eye. Rarely is it sight-threatening; some but not all manifestations are amenable to treatment, including with enzyme replacement and substrate reduction therapy. Retinal involvement is rare but patients with ocular manifestations should be monitored and treated early to reduce the risk of progression and further complications. As Gaucher disease is also associated with Parkinsons disease and may also confer an increased risk of malignancy (particularly haematological forms and melanoma), any ocular abnormalities should be fully investigated to exclude these potential underlying conditions.

Budget Impact Analysis of Eliglustat for the Treatment of Gaucher Disease Type 1 in the United States

BACKGROUND

Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is a rare, genetic, lysosomal storage disease with no cure. Current treatment options include intravenous (IV) enzyme replacement therapy ([ERT]; imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, or taliglucerase alfa) or oral substrate reduction therapy ([SRT]; eliglustat or miglustat). The cost to U.S. payers of an IV-administered drug can vary depending on the site of care (i.e., home, outpatient clinic, or hospital setting). Treatment with oral eliglustat may present an opportunity for cost savings.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the budget impact from a U.S. payer perspective associated with transitioning patients receiving ERTs to the oral SRT eliglustat for the treatment of adults with GD1.

METHODS

A budget impact model estimated the change in pharmaceutical and administration costs resulting from increasing the market share of eliglustat from 12% (current) to 44% (new). The market share for eliglustat was drawn equally from existing shares of imiglucerase (40%) and velaglucerase alfa (40%) and assumed to be static over the analysis period. ERT costs were adjusted to account for site of care-based markup and the proportion of patients receiving infusions in each site of care (home, infusion center, or hospital outpatient). Annual ERT costs were calculated assuming a biweekly dose of 47.4 U per kg, a 72-kg patient weight, and 24 infusions per year. The effect of key variables was tested in the sensitivity analyses. All costs are expressed in 2017 U.S. dollars.

RESULTS

In a new plan with 5 million members and 25 GD1 treated patients, increased use of eliglustat resulted in an annual savings of $1,526,710 and a total savings of $4,580,130 (13.6%) over 3 years. The corresponding annual per member per month savings was $0.025. This is further illustrated in the sensitivity and scenario analyses where the use of eliglustat was cost saving in all cases. Shifting more patients receiving ERT in the hospital outpatient setting to eliglustat resulted in increased savings.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these analyses, increased use of eliglustat resulted in meaningful cost savings to a payer's overall budget. Cost savings are highest among patients switching from ERT administered in a hospital outpatient setting. The results suggest that cost savings are also likely achievable from initiating patients on oral eliglustat instead of infusion-based therapy from the outset of treatment.

DISCLOSURES

This study was sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme. Evidera received funding from Sanofi Genzyme to conduct this study and prepare the manuscript. The sponsor collaborated on the study design, analysis, interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript. Nalysnyk is an employee of and shareholder in Sanofi Genzyme. Ward, Cele, and Uyei are employees of Evidera, which provides consulting and other research services to biopharmaceutical companies. Sugarman was also an Evidera employee when the study was being conducted and the manuscript written. This study was presented as a poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2016, October 3-6, 2016; National City, MD, and at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22nd Annual International Meeting; May 20-24, 2017; Boston, MA.

The Importance of a Multidisciplinary Approach in the Management of a Patient with Type I Gaucher Disease

Managing the multisystemic symptoms of type I Gaucher Disease (GD) requires a multidisciplinary team approach that includes disease-specific treatments, as well as supportive care. This involves a range of medical specialists, general practitioners, supportive care providers, and patients. Phenotype classification and the setting of treatment goals are important for optimizing the management of type I GD, and for providing personalized care. The ability to classify disease severity using validated measurement tools allows the standardization of patient monitoring, and the measurement of disease progression and treatment response. Defining treatment goals is useful to provide a benchmark for assessing treatment response and managing the expectations of patients and their families. Although treatment goals will vary depending on disease severity, they include the stabilization, improvement or reversal (if possible) of clinical manifestations. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is the standard care for patients with type I GD, but a novel substrate reduction therapy (SRT), Eliglustat, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in selected patients. To ensure that treatment goals are being achieved, regular and comprehensive follow up are necessary.

How we manage Gaucher Disease in the era of choices

Treatment of Gaucher Disease (GD) is now beset with the abundance of therapeutic options for an individual patient, making the choice of therapy complex for both expert and non-expert clinicians. The pathogenesis of all disease manifestations is a gene mutation-driven deficiency of glucocerebrosidase, but the clinical expression and response of each of the clinical manifestations to different therapies can be difficult to predict. Enzyme replacement therapy has been available since 1991 and is well-established, with known efficacy and minimal toxicity. Of interest, the three available enzymes are distinct molecules and were registered as new products, not biosimilars. Oral substrate reduction therapy has undergone a revitalisation with a newly approved agent in this class for which some efficacy and toxicity questions have been raised. Herein we present our approach to the management of GD in the era of choices, including a new algorithm for how to manage a newly diagnosed patient.

Once- versus twice-daily dosing of eliglustat in adults with Gaucher disease type 1: The Phase 3, randomized, double-blind EDGE trial

Eliglustat is a first-line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) with compatible CYP2D6-metabolizer phenotypes (>90% of patients). The randomized, double-blind EDGE trial (NCT01074944, Sanofi Genzyme) evaluated once-daily eliglustat dosing compared with the approved twice-daily regimen at the same total daily dose in adults with GD1. Subjects received twice-daily dosing during a 6- to 18-month lead-in period. Only subjects who attained prespecified treatment goals for hemoglobin, platelet count, spleen and liver volumes, and bone symptoms during the lead-in period were randomized to once- or twice-daily dosing. Of 170 enrolled patients, 156 completed the lead-in period and 131 met all requirements to enter the double-blind treatment period. To achieve the composite primary endpoint in the double-blind period, patients had to maintain clinical stability relative to baseline on all five endpoints (hemoglobin, platelet count, spleen and liver volumes, and bone symptoms) and meet pharmacokinetic and other tolerability requirements as determined by the investigator after 1year of eliglustat treatment. After 1year, 80.4% (95% CI: 67.6, 89.8) of once-daily patients were stable compared with 83.1% (95% CI: 71.0, 91.6) of twice-daily patients. The 95% CI for the mean difference of -2.7% between groups was -17.7, 11.9. Because the lower bound of the CI exceeded the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -15%, once-daily dosing could not be declared non-inferior to twice-daily dosing. Both once-daily and twice-daily patients maintained mean values for hematologic and visceral measures within established therapeutic goals during the double-blind treatment and long-term extension periods. Eliglustat was generally well-tolerated during this long-term trial (mean treatment duration: 3.3years), with just four withdrawals (2%) for related adverse events (AE), and similar AE profiles for both dosing regimens. Patients on twice-daily eliglustat showed more stability overall, and this dose regimen was better tolerated, confirming the dosing regimen for most patients specified in the drug label.

Tuning protein folding in lysosomal storage diseases: the chemistry behind pharmacological chaperones

Misfolding of proteins is the basis of several proteinopathies. Chemical and pharmacological chaperones are small molecules capable of inducing the correct conformation of proteins, thus being of interest for human therapeutics. The most recent developments in medicinal chemistry and in the drug development of pharmacological chaperones are discussed, with focus on lysosomal storage diseases.

Current strategies for the treatment of inborn errors of metabolism

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) are a large group of inherited disorders characterized by disruption of metabolic pathways due to deficient enzymes, cofactors, or transporters. The rapid advances in the understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of many IEMs, have led to significant progress in the development of many new treatments. The institution and continued expansion of newborn screening provide the opportunity for early treatment, leading to reduced morbidity and mortality. This review provides an overview of the diverse therapeutic approaches and recent advances in the treatment of IEMs that focus on the basic principles of reducing substrate accumulation, replacing or enhancing absent or reduced enzyme or cofactor, and supplementing product deficiency. In addition, the challenges and obstacles of current treatment modalities and future treatment perspectives are reviewed and discussed.

Neurological manifestations of lysosomal disorders and emerging therapies targeting the CNS

Lysosomal disorders have been an area of interest since intravenous enzyme replacement therapy was successfully introduced for the treatment of Gaucher's disease in the early 1990s. This treatment approach has also been developed for several other lysosomal disorders, including Fabry's disease, Pompe's disease, lysosomal acid lipase deficiency, and five types of mucopolysaccharidosis. Despite the benefits of enzyme replacement therapy, it has limitations-most importantly, its ineffectiveness in treating the neurological components of lysosomal disorders, as only a small proportion of recombinant enzymes can cross the blood-brain barrier. Development of strategies to improve drug delivery to the CNS is now the primary focus in lysosomal disorder research. This Review discusses the neurological manifestations and emerging therapies for the CNS component of these diseases. The therapies in development (which are now in phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trials) might be for specific lysosomal disorders (enzyme replacement therapy via intrathecal or intracerebroventricular routes or with fusion proteins, or gene therapy) or applicable to more than one lysosomal disorder (haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, pharmacological chaperones, substrate reduction therapy, or stop codon readthrough). The combination of early diagnosis with effective therapies should change the outlook for patients with lysosomal disorders with neurological involvement in the next 5-10 years.

Personalized medicine: Genetic risk prediction of drug response

Pharmacogenomics (PGx), a substantial component of "personalized medicine", seeks to understand each individual's genetic composition to optimize drug therapy -- maximizing beneficial drug response, while minimizing adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Drug responses are highly variable because innumerable factors contribute to ultimate phenotypic outcomes. Recent genome-wide PGx studies have provided some insight into genetic basis of variability in drug response. These can be grouped into three categories. [a] Monogenic (Mendelian) traits include early examples mostly of inherited disorders, and some severe (idiosyncratic) ADRs typically influenced by single rare coding variants. [b] Predominantly oligogenic traits represent variation largely influenced by a small number of major pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic genes. [c] Complex PGx traits resemble most multifactorial quantitative traits -- influenced by numerous small-effect variants, together with epigenetic effects and environmental factors. Prediction of monogenic drug responses is relatively simple, involving detection of underlying mutations; due to rarity of these events and incomplete penetrance, however, prospective tests based on genotype will have high false-positive rates, plus pharmacoeconomics will require justification. Prediction of predominantly oligogenic traits is slowly improving. Although a substantial fraction of variation can be explained by limited numbers of large-effect genetic variants, uncertainty in successful predictions and overall cost-benefit ratios will make such tests elusive for everyday clinical use. Prediction of complex PGx traits is almost impossible in the foreseeable future. Genome-wide association studies of large cohorts will continue to discover relevant genetic variants; however, these small-effect variants, combined, explain only a small fraction of phenotypic variance -- thus having limited predictive power and clinical utility.

Thrombocytopenia and GBA gene mutation in a patient with adult type 1 Gaucher disease

A 38-year-old female patient was diagnosed with anemia for 3 years. Medical examination showed slight splenomegaly (250 × 62 mm), thrombocytopenia (platelets 51 × 10⁹/L), anemia (Hb levels 107 g/L), and β-glucocerebrosidase activity (GBA) in leukocytes was lower than normal. Microscopic findings of bone marrow smear demonstrated that Gaucher cells in bone marrow and periodic acid-Schiff staining of them were positive. Sequencing of GBA genomic and cDNA identified one novel homozygous mutation, c.484A> G (p.Met162Val). This case suggests that we should pay attention to adult Gaucher disease as a differential diagnosis for cryptogenic thrombocytopenia and one novel homozygous mutation in GBA gene was reported for the first time. The novel mutation in homozygosity is apparently associated with mild, non-neuronopathic type 1 disease which is relatively uncommon in Asian populations.

A new framework for evaluating the health impacts of treatment for Gaucher disease type 1

Background

The Disease Severity Scoring System (DS3) is a validated measure for evaluating Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) severity. We developed a new framework, consisting of health states, transition probabilities between those states, and preferences for those states (utilities) based on the DS3 to predict long-term outcomes of patients starting treatment. We defined nine mutually exclusive (alive) health states based on three DS3 categories: mild (0 ≤ DS3 ≤ 3.5) without symptoms of bone disease; mild with bone pain, mild with severe skeletal complications (SSC) defined as lytic lesions, avascular necrosis, or fracture; moderate (3.5 < DS3 ≤ 6.5) without SSC; moderate with SSC; marked (6.5 < DS3 ≤ 9.5) without SSC; marked with SSC; severe (9.5 < DS3 ≤ 19) without SSC; and severe with SSC. Health-state transition probabilities and utilities were estimated from a longitudinal sample of patients with GD1 who started enzyme replacement therapy (the DS3 Score Study). Age dependent GD1-specific mortality was derived from published data. We used a Markov state-transition model to illustrate how to estimate time spent in each health state.

Results

The average predicted utilities for each health state ranged from 0.76 for mild disease with no clinical symptoms of bone disease to 0.52 with severe disease with SSC. Transition probabilities depended on disease severity (DS3 score) at treatment initiation and whether patients had undergone a total splenectomy or had an intact spleen/partial splenectomy prior to starting treatment. Patients who started treatment with intact or residual spleens spent more time in better health states than those who started treatment with total splenectomy.

Conclusions

This new framework, which is based on the DS3, can be used to project the long-term outcomes of GD1 patients starting treatment. The framework could also be used to compare the long-term outcomes of different GD1 treatment options.

Trial registration

NCT01136304. Registered: May 31, 2010 (retrospectively registered).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0592-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Eliglustat maintains long-term clinical stability in patients with Gaucher disease type 1 stabilized on enzyme therapy

In the phase 3 Study of Eliglustat Tartrate (Genz-112638) in Patients With Gaucher Disease Who Have Reached Therapeutic Goals With Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ENCORE), at 1 year, eliglustat was noninferior to imiglucerase enzyme therapy in maintaining stable platelet counts, hemoglobin concentrations, and spleen and liver volumes. After this primary analysis period, patients entered a long-term extension phase in which all received eliglustat. Duration on eliglustat ranged from 2 to 5 years, depending on timing of enrollment (which spanned 2 years), treatment group to which patients were randomized, and whether they lived in the United States when commercial eliglustat became available. Here we report long-term safety and efficacy of eliglustat for 157 patients who received eliglustat in the ENCORE trial; data are available for 46 patients who received eliglustat for 4 years. Mean hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, and spleen and liver volumes remained stable for up to 4 years. Year to year, all 4 measures remained collectively stable (composite end point relative to baseline values) in ≥85% of patients as well as individually in ≥92%. Mean bone mineral density z scores (lumbar spine and femur) remained stable and were maintained in the healthy reference range throughout. Eliglustat was well tolerated over 4 years; 4 (2.5%) patients withdrew because of adverse events that were considered related to the study drug. No new or long-term safety concerns were identified. Clinical stability assessed by composite and individual measures was maintained in adults with Gaucher disease type 1 treated with eliglustat who remained in the ENCORE trial for up to 4 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00943111.

Gaucher disease: Progress and ongoing challenges

Over the past decades, tremendous progress has been made in the field of Gaucher disease, the inherited deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase. Many of the colossal achievements took place during the course of the sixty-year tenure of Dr. Roscoe Brady at the National Institutes of Health. These include the recognition of the enzymatic defect involved, the isolation and characterization of the protein, the localization and characterization of the gene and its nearby pseudogene, as well as the identification of the first mutant alleles in patients. The first treatment for Gaucher disease, enzyme replacement therapy, was conceived of, developed and tested at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health. Advances including recombinant production of the enzyme, the development of mouse models, pioneering gene therapy experiments, high throughput screens of small molecules and the generation of induced pluripotent stem cell models have all helped to catapult research in Gaucher disease into the twenty-first century. The appreciation that mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene are an important risk factor for parkinsonism further expands the impact of this work. However, major challenges still remain, some of which are described here, that will provide opportunities, excitement and discovery for the next generations of Gaucher investigators.

Rethinking fatigue in Gaucher disease

Background

Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare lysosomal storage disease caused by deficiency in the enzyme beta-glucocerebrosidase. Along with visceral, hematologic, and bone manifestations, patients may experience chronic fatigue resulting in functional disability and reduced quality of life. Management of the disease includes therapeutic intervention, supportive therapies, and regular monitoring of all clinically relevant disease signs and symptoms. However, current practice guidelines do not include measurement of fatigue or therapeutic goals for fatigue.

Objective

To provide insight regarding key considerations for fatigue in GD.

Methods

We conducted a systematic PubMed literature search and an exploratory, hypothesis-generating survey regarding fatigue in GD.

Results

Our literature search resulted in 19 publications. Of these, 6 were identified that assessed fatigue, including 2 that used specific fatigue assessment instruments. In our survey involving 14 patients with Type 1 GD and 19 physicians, patients ascribed greater importance to fatigue than other disease parameters, while physicians placed more emphasis on objective measures of visceral and hematologic disease manifestations.

Conclusions

Collectively, the results of our literature analysis and survey underscore the need for further investigation and in-office evaluation of fatigue in patients with GD, which will require a reliable, validated, and disease-specific instrument. Criteria for clinically significant fatigue in patients with GD should be established along with the development of a fatigue scale specifically designed for this patient population to provide a more objective means to potentially incorporate fatigue assessment into routine monitoring practices.

Progress and potential of non-inhibitory small molecule chaperones for the treatment of Gaucher disease and its implications for Parkinson disease

Gaucher disease, caused by pathological mutations GBA1, encodes the lysosome-resident enzyme glucocerebrosidase, which cleaves glucosylceramide into glucose and ceramide. In Gaucher disease, glucocerebrosidase deficiency leads to lysosomal accumulation of substrate, primarily in cells of the reticulo-endothelial system. Gaucher disease has broad clinical heterogeneity, and mutations in GBA1 are a risk factor for the development of different synucleinopathies. Insights into the cell biology and biochemistry of glucocerebrosidase have led to new therapeutic approaches for Gaucher disease including small chemical chaperones. Such chaperones facilitate proper enzyme folding and translocation to lysosomes, thereby preventing premature breakdown of the enzyme in the proteasome. This review discusses recent progress in developing chemical chaperones as a therapy for Gaucher disease, with implications for the treatment of synucleinopathies. It focuses on the development of non-inhibitory glucocerebrosidase chaperones and their therapeutic advantages over inhibitory chaperones, as well as the challenges involved in identifying and validating chemical chaperones.

Gene therapy for lysosomal storage disorders: a good start

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are a heterogeneous group of inherited diseases with a collective frequency of ∼1 in 7000 births, resulting from the deficiency in one or more enzymes or transporters that normally reside within the lysosomes. Pathology results from the progressive accumulation of uncleaved lipids, glycoproteins and/or glycosaminoglycans in the lysosomes and secondary damages that affect the brain, viscera, bones and connective tissues. Most treatment modalities developed for LSD, including gene therapy (GT), are based on the lysosome-specific cross-correction mechanism, by which close proximity of normal cells leads to the correction of the biochemical consequences of enzymatic deficiency within the neighboring cells. Here, GT efforts addressing these disorders are reviewed with an up-to-date discussion of their impact on the LSD disease phenotype in animal models and patients.