[Surgical treatment of anal incontinence]

Sacral nerve stimulation can alleviate symptoms of bowel dysfunction after colorectal resections

AIM

Poor functional results, such as faecal incontinence (FI), low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) or high stool frequency, can occur after colorectal resections, including proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), rectal resection and left hemicolectomy. Management of such patients is problematic, and some case reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in these situations. Our aim was to analyse the effectiveness of SNS on poor functional results and on quality of life in patients after treatment with different types of colorectal resection.

METHOD

At five university hospitals from 2006 to 2014, patients with poor functional results after rectal resection, IPAA or left hemicolectomy underwent a staged SNS implant procedure. Failure was defined by the absence or insufficient improvement (< 50%) of FI episodes.

RESULTS

SNS for bowel dysfunction was performed in 16 patients after rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis, left hemicolectomy with colorectal anastomosis or IPAA. Two (13%) cases of primary failure were observed after the percutaneous stimulation test. Median frequency of stool, FI episodes and urgency were significantly improved in 14 patients. Wexner and LARS scores were also significantly improved for 14 patients. When we compared results according to the type of colorectal surgery (IPAA, rectal resection or left hemicolectomy), median frequencies of stool and urgency, Wexner and LARS scores were still significantly improved. Overall success rate was 75% (12/16 patients) in intention-to-treat analysis and 86% (12/14 patients with permanent electrode) in per-protocol analysis.

CONCLUSION

SNS seems to improve bowel dysfunction following rectal resection, left hemicolectomy or IPAA.

Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation

BACKGROUND AND METHOD

This systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence and constipation. Electronic databases and selected websites were searched for studies evaluating SNS in the treatment of faecal incontinence or constipation. Primary outcome measures included episodes of faecal incontinence per week (faecal incontinence studies) and number of evacuations per week (constipation studies).

RESULTS

From 106 potentially relevant reports, six patient series and one crossover study of SNS for faecal incontinence, and four patient series and one crossover study of SNS for constipation, were included. After implantation, 41-75 per cent of patients achieved complete faecal continence and 75-100 per cent experienced improvement in episodes of incontinence. There were 19 adverse events among 149 patients. The small crossover study reported increased episodes of faecal incontinence when the implanted pulse generator was switched off. Case series of SNS for constipation reported an increased frequency of evacuation. There were four adverse events among the 20 patients with a permanent implant. The small crossover study reported a reduced number of evacuations when the pulse generator was switched off.

CONCLUSION

SNS results in significant improvement in faecal incontinence in patients resistant to conservative treatment. Early data also suggest benefit in the treatment of constipation.

Validation of the French version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life (FIQL) scale

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this multicenter study was to validate the French version of the fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale (FIQL scale) developed in the Unites States of America.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The FIQL scale has 29 items in four scales: lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception and embarrassment. Each item is scored from 1 to 4, with poorest quality-of-life scored 1. An average is calculated for each scale. After linguistic validation of the questionnaire, the French version of the FIQL scale was tested twice, at day 0 and day 7, by 100 patients with fecal incontinence (FI). Construction validity, internal reliability, clinical validity and reproducibility were analysed.

RESULTS

Analysis of convergent validity of the French version of the FIQL scale showed very good correlation between items and the corresponding scale for lifestyle (0.50-0.79) and depression/self-perception (0.44-0.74), good correlation for coping/behavior (0.31-0.70) and weak correlation for embarrassment (0.30-0.40). Valid discrimination was observed for 24 of the 29 items. Internal reliability was good for each scale (alpha Cronbach between 0.78 and 0.92). Scores determined with the FIQL scale were significantly correlated with Wexner FI scores, demonstrating the clinical validity of the instrument. Reproducibility, evaluated in patients whose FI was unchanged between day 0 and day 7, was good with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.80 (embarrassment) to 0.93 (lifestyle).

CONCLUSIONS

The linguistic and psychometric evaluation demonstrated the validity of the French version of the FIQL scale. This standardized instrument is now available for clinical use in France for quality-of-life assessment in patients with FI.

Long-term functional results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

A number of patients suffer from gastrointestinal side effects following sphincter-saving resection of the rectum. The aim of this study was to assess frequency and risk factors of long-term gastrointestinal side effects after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1980 and 1997, among 209 patients treated for rectal cancer by rectal resection and sphincter conservation, 145 who were alive without recurrence or colostomy, responded to a questionnaire. There were 85 males and 60 females with a mean age of 64 Years; the follow-up was 5.4 Years. The functional result was considered good if the number of stools per 24h was three or less with normal continence and poor if the number of stools was four or more or if fecal incontinence was present. Influence of age, gender, anastomotic height, type of sutured colon, colonic pouch, defunctioning stoma, leakage, stenosis, radiotherapy, history of irritable bowel syndrome and follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean anastomotic height was 5 cm from the anal margin. Functional results were good in 56% of patients and poor in 44%. Univariate analysis showed three variables to be significantly associated with the functional results: anastomotic height (P=0.001), radiotherapy (P=0.03) and follow-up > 24 Months (P=0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that only anastomotic height independently influenced functional results. They were good in 76%, 53% and 35% of patients for anastomoses located above 6 cm, between 6 and 3 cm, and below 3 cm from the anal margin, respectively.

CONCLUSION

After sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer, about half of patients have poor long-term functional results, the latter being related only to the anastomotic height. This suggests the need to preserve a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible.